"Tolerance"- A Sneaky Attack on Your Identity

By Henry Makow Ph.D.
April 28, 2007

Identity.jpg 
by Henry Makow Ph.D.


For centuries the Masonic central bankers who control Western society and culture have been pushing "tolerance." Why?

"The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is a notorious "forgery" that uncannily explains our predicament. It says the Illuminati bankers want to "dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us." (Protocols, Section 5)

The four major collective forces are: Race, Religion, Family and Nation. They are the four pillars of our human identity.

How do you undermine them? Certainly a frontal attack would meet with spirited resistance. Instead you promote "tolerance" which destroys these collective forces by erasing the differences between them.

Thus you have ecumenicalism in religion, miscegenation in race, and regionalism (i.e. EU, NAU) in nation states. You destroy family by erasing gender differences.

At this stage, the Masonic bankers perceive Christian and Islamic nations as their principal adversary. But eventually all national, racial and religious identity will come under their gun.

"Tolerance" is applied selectively. We must tolerate what undermines these collective forces but have "zero tolerance" for efforts to resist or uphold them.

Thus Black rappers can trash Black females but Don Imus is fired for a passing remark. Zero tolerance for white heterosexual Christians.

Gay activists can plot the end of "hetero-normative" society but the EU censors Poland for "hate" because it doesn't allow public schools to promote homosexuality.

Boris Berezovsky, the Russian oligarch in London can publicly plot the violent overthrow of Vladimir Putin from his London exile, and use Muslim Chechen terrorists to kill Russian children at Beslan, but anyone else mistaken for a Muslim terrorist faces torture or death. Tolerance for Rothschild shills; zero tolerance for everyone else.

American Zionists can instigate a disastrous war in Iraq, but the EU declares illegal any scrutiny of the Jewish holocaust, which might deprive these Zionists of their impunity. Truth can withstand scrutiny. Zero tolerance for Muslims and Christians.

"Tolerance" (and "human rights") are nothing but Orwellian doublespeak for the banker world government agenda. I am in favor of genuine tolerance but no one should tolerate the Satanic agenda of our money lenders.

I will focus on one aspect of this agenda: the attempts by the American Psychological Association to suppress therapies that help homosexuals assume a heterosexual life.

In our "tolerant" world, homosexuals are tolerated unless they become heterosexuals again.

ZERO TOLERANCE FOR HETEROSEXUALS 

In the one-race, one-religion, one-world government, we are to have one sex as well. The bankers are creating a homosexual society by blurring the line between masculine and feminine. (This uniformity is called "Diversity." )

In 1973 the Rockefellers had the American Psychological Association change the definition of homosexual from a disorder to a normal lifestyle choice. If you google "Rockefeller Foundation" and the APA, you will get about 500,000 links, indicative of how the bankers buy "scientists" and other "professionals" by the tonne.

Some psychologists protested this banker takeover. One was Ray Johnson,
who wrote that the APA "has been seized by political activists who have little regard for science or the democratic process. Since the seventies, the American Psychological Association has lobbied the government, filed court briefs, and engaged in and promoted boycotts on behalf of ..the ERA, unrestricted abortion (including abortion for
children without parental notification and consent), sex and racial-ethnic discrimination, and homosexual politics."

The APA is lobbying to have homosexuals declared "a protected minority." It engages in intimidation and propaganda. It threatened with boycotts "states whose citizens passed APA disapproved laws regarding homosexuality. It has supported efforts to introduce programs into the public schools to "reduce prejudice" aimed at so-called "gay, lesbian
and bisexual youth" or "prehomosexual" children." "American Psychology:
The Political Science"

Does this sound like "tolerance" to you? The APA is vehemently against "conversion therapy" because they can't have homosexuals reverting to heterosexuality. That implies something is wrong with homosexuality!

In 1979 the noted sex therapists Masters and Johnson published their findings that 72% of dissatisfied homosexuals who entered their program converted to satisfied heterosexuals, based on follow-up five years later. Immediately the APA attack hounds condemned their methodology and claimed the men weren't really homosexuals. The careers of the sex
therapists went into eclipse.

Only in a Masonic Communist system like our own is science determined by politics.

CONCLUSION

To understand our world, we must appreciate that we are frogs in a large pot, having our identities boiled and blended. Our culture -- the pot and the stove -- is largely a fraud.

The bankers want us to identify as consumers and producers only, and be amenable to guidance by their "experts", presumably members of the APA.

Let's resist by strengthening our identities: sexual, national, religious and racial, respecting but not deferring to others.
----

See also "The Fraudulent Basis of Modern Kulture"

See below: "Communism Negated Nation State: Precursor of NWO" by Thomas Allen

See also "Protocols Hold Key to Our Exasperation"

 

Comments for ""Tolerance"- A Sneaky Attack on Your Identity"

Julian Lee said (May 2, 2007):

I wanted to let you know that our site www.celibacy.info
has a new level of activity and freshness now. I have a core of about 5-6 men who make audios for it,as well as freshly updated news links much more often. There is a new audiotoday on porn and the view of the female by one of our Indian associates, Anand Krishnan.


Don replies to Richard said (May 1, 2007):

I agree in part with Richard's remarks (below). The 'but' is: A common mistake for the "homo-impaired" as with the racially or religiously prejudiced is to assume that if some do a 'thing' then they all do a thing. I also find the behavior that Richard describes as repulsive . In fact most of what I see on the streets and in the media reporting on the parades and such is also repulsive to me. Yes that even includes sodomy. I don't know the figures or percentages but, I have enough experience in my search for inner wholeness to know that there are a fair amount of gay people who believe as I do in that regard. Once again I go back to what I said earlier. In that, if parents would teach their gay identified children less self hate and more about how to live a dignified, giving,moderate life, we would see less of the in your face, rebellious anti-social behavior.


Richard said (May 1, 2007):

Sir: A joy to read your articles. Although you make sense on the "homosexual" behavior, they will be plenty(like Don-below) who would argue your findings, to justify their "abnormal" behavior. As a child of the sixties, I remember,vividly, going to San Francisco, the mecca for this sick "way of life" and actually walked by establishments advertising their nightly shows of homosexuals engaging is "animal behavior". They would nail each other to the wall, while someone would fist f....them from behind.

This animalistic and depraved behavior is the one the system is telling us nowadays to be "tolerant" with? The idea of seeing a muscle man holding hands with another and behaving contrary to his nature, is simply sickening. Another point, is the fact that they have no respect for heterosexuals.In my younger years, I was approached several times, even though I am a men's man. Recruiting is one of their tools and they use the school system to do so. These people are sick and their behavior, with proper treatment, can be easily reversed.

Unfortunately, this behavior, has become the norm. In fact, being a real man, is a federal crime nowadays. Keep up the great work.


Don said (April 30, 2007):

While I can't argue with you on a good amount of the subjects you address. ( I have visited your web site on several occasions). Your consistent and, to my eyes cornucopia of anti_homosexual mash is just way over the top.

I am a man of 56 years. I have been monogamously married to the same woman for 36 of those years and raised what have turned out to be two fine men. However, what is known to only my wife and a couple of friends of ours, is that I am also a gay man. For about fifteen years of our marriage, in an effort to change my sexual preference (note that I say sexual preference, not sexual behavior ), I involved myself in various groups and counseling, both Christian and secular. I sir am here to tell you that change of this nature does not happen.

In both my experience and observation, some sexual behavior can be changed but, sexual preference can never be chosen or changed. I nearly died trying (chose suicide) trying to change who and what I fundamentally am. I was, as it could be said: "A house divided". It wasn't until I finally realized this fact and accepted the man that I am, was I able to claim some peace in my inner being. I have remained married and do not seek a relationship outside of my marriage. That is the commitment I made 36 years ago. That is the choice I have made.

I must say though, a hole in my soul exists because of my youthful ignorance and in their "moral" judgment, the ignorance of those that have gone before me .


I don't expect you to publish this but if you do, please don't use my last name or city.


James said (April 30, 2007):

I attended the public school system for 12 years. I did not start to learn until after "graduation" from high school. What a waste of time public school is. All concerned parents should teach their children at home.
The school teachers are just as confused as the students.

For example, The "DARE" program taught at public schools actually introduces the allure of drugs into the minds of young people. This program
does very little to help students to refuse drugs. Psychologically, it is also designed to weaken one's volition in a society where commercial drug advertisement runs rampant. The drug pushers are also the zealous advertisers, manufacturers, and doctors who prescribe these chemical "alternatives" to a wholesome spiritual solution.

I loathed attending sexual education class. How uncomfortable and spiritually degrading this was to an adolescent. A friend related to me an
instance where the whole class was shown a video of a woman giving birth. I am proud that I skipped school and refused to be indoctrinated during so many occasions. Consequently I missed the episode of the woman giving birth.

These escapades took place ten years ago. It is horrible to think of what might be taking place in pathetic"sex- education" class around the country these days.

Public school systems promote anti-social tendencies. Before the first class commenced, students enjoyed an outsider rendevous across the street and shared cigarettes and pot. My friend who was an intelligent honor roll student also frequented the gatherings. There was no doubt by anyone that he was destined for a decent college education and a successful life, as desirable as it sounds. Currently, he is struggling with alcoholism, failure to find work and troubled with the company and ill influences of misguided
human beings. It is up to me to help this person find the right path.

I earned terrible grades in "school" but have kept my conscience and uncovered the spiritual path and the joy of seeking a fulfilling life. As we know,it is not up to socialist- public school to guide us, to teach us morals, to help us cope with the gamut of human personality or to help us
become decent, concerned people, worthy of being called human-beings.

We have quite a task on our hands; to seek purpose, to be aware of our actions and thoughts and to achieve all that we are capable of doing for the good of humanity and creation while dwelling in the jungle of human transgressions.


Guy in Uk said (April 29, 2007):

We are dying of stupidity – I have come to loathe the words ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity.’ This Orwellian reversal of language to mean the opposite of what is says is truly Evil with a capital ‘E.’ Organisations like the Moonies and the Scientologists are easily recognised by outsiders as brain washing cults – but because Socialism with it’s vernacular of Political Correctness is so universal – as your article indicates, the EC lives and breathes in that vernacular – people do not realise it is the biggest mind control cult that ever existed – anybody who uses bogus invented words like ‘sexism’, ‘racism’ and ‘homophobia’ may as well have a large banner over their head declaring ‘ I have given my mind away.’


Sergio said (April 28, 2007):

I just wanted to say that this was an awesome article.

The issue of promoted "tolerance" was very hard for me to understand. They use arguments to end "difference" among people, but they don´t do that with the intention of creating loving communities, but on the contrary, they just want to centralise power. In truth they have no respect for the richness that "difference" is, and just want to homogenize everything.

In a way their propaganda goes on baiting people. They start with a truth and then from there they lead people down a chain of thought to where they desire to go. And it leaves people in a situation in which they can´t question anything, because if they do, it´s as if they question the first premise, that is perceived as true.

For example, people shouldn´t be discriminated based on race - true. But from there they have led society into such a situation in which
an innocent commentary can be perceived as rascism and there can be consequences for that.

And the whole goal for that is to homogenize the population and make it easier for them to control and govern.


Hal said (April 28, 2007):

Very well done, Henry. One of your master's touch projections!

You may remember Perry Como had a hit entitled, "Keep It Gay" in which there is a line, "keep it light keep it gay". He would have found your article fitting to that tune as you indeed make it on point of the homosexual role in the destruction of our "value system" and you did hold the weight of it down to a more common receptive level without giving up the foundational considerations to be gained in/by/from the article! I consider that to thicken the brew would play to either those already hell-bent against its substance or possibly appeared redundant to those already on board with the idea, changing opinions in neither regard! Thus my appraisal of the well placed "lighter touch" to a most weighty trend of thought!