June 20, 2008
Oh yeah, another thing about X, he's been blacklisted. His evidence of that is irrefutable. He remembers at one time he was invited to things under auspices of very high up names that showed an interest in him, but then simply cut him off, and he never understood it.
Same thing happened to me for years when I was still young and useful. I asked, 'any private conversations that you felt you were being asked to do something a bit unethical, and refused?' He remembered that too. I suggest that the elite wants clever young people and these are tests, recruitment. As we know from the study of Masonry, they want to get useful young people and the test is for two things: ability to keep secrets, and willingness to do favors or carry out orders without questioning them, no matter the ethical implications. I went through that testing here in Y in 1981-1982, and I failed, and walked away from it. Why on earth I though it would be any different down here 25 years later I don't know
One thing I know. Whomever we see out front most prominently carrying out the agenda of the Luciferian elite, the real capstone, they are the worker bees - not the top. The top doesn't expose itself.
The same thing happened to me that happened to X, failing the recruitment. It's an ethics and scruples exam, and there's always a test on Friday. I have a private joke about it, remembering the old Starkist Tuna commercials with 'Charlie the Tuna', who's always coming up with a hare brained scheme to get to accepted by Starkist. He tries to show how much class and good taste he has. But the little fish keeps telling him, "but Charlie, Starkist doesn't want tunas with good taste, they want tunas that TASTE GOOD!"
It's the same with this Masonic culture. They don't care about intelligence of talent, only whether someone can be useful to their agenda in blind obedience. X's been blacklisted. Being from an old Jewish family didn't cut him any slack once he began to notice things and ask the wrong questions of the wrong people....
X ferrets out volumes of information on all subjects on a daily basis. My file folders are huge with info from that about where the IT leaders are taking us out there.
Here's on current example. This week, the Mozilla Firefox browser released Firefox 3, which on their site touts a quantum leap in smart surfing data processing which they say will replace bookmarks. It's all automatic, it learns how you surf and assembles all the information for you, specifically.
Sounds great, right? But a few weeks ago X went to one of those cutting edge 'dev cons' where the head of Mozilla gave a talk on it -- it turns out to be the thin edge of the wedge to store you local data remotely on a third party server.......
.
Well...we all know the motive for that. To insiders it was announced that this is where things will go next ---- it is being sold as 'perfect security', no more viruses, no more web bots or adware messing up your folders on C:drive ... because in a few years, they plan for nobody to have a C:drive. They want everybody's data stored on a third party server.
Right now, what's on your C: or D: drives can only be gotten by hacking into it. They are promising unhackable remote storage as standard for future home computing. The benefits to sell the notion is that without all those GB to hunt through on your local pc, the 'experience' will finally be shed of slow RAM, antivirus software, etc.
And sell it will. The public will beg for this now. Forgetting what everyone was concerned about in 1999 --- privacy.
How can people forget that the governments now have 100% access to any private data stored on any third party server???
Same thing happened to me for years when I was still young and useful. I asked, 'any private conversations that you felt you were being asked to do something a bit unethical, and refused?' He remembered that too. I suggest that the elite wants clever young people and these are tests, recruitment. As we know from the study of Masonry, they want to get useful young people and the test is for two things: ability to keep secrets, and willingness to do favors or carry out orders without questioning them, no matter the ethical implications. I went through that testing here in Y in 1981-1982, and I failed, and walked away from it. Why on earth I though it would be any different down here 25 years later I don't know
One thing I know. Whomever we see out front most prominently carrying out the agenda of the Luciferian elite, the real capstone, they are the worker bees - not the top. The top doesn't expose itself.
The same thing happened to me that happened to X, failing the recruitment. It's an ethics and scruples exam, and there's always a test on Friday. I have a private joke about it, remembering the old Starkist Tuna commercials with 'Charlie the Tuna', who's always coming up with a hare brained scheme to get to accepted by Starkist. He tries to show how much class and good taste he has. But the little fish keeps telling him, "but Charlie, Starkist doesn't want tunas with good taste, they want tunas that TASTE GOOD!"
It's the same with this Masonic culture. They don't care about intelligence of talent, only whether someone can be useful to their agenda in blind obedience. X's been blacklisted. Being from an old Jewish family didn't cut him any slack once he began to notice things and ask the wrong questions of the wrong people....
X ferrets out volumes of information on all subjects on a daily basis. My file folders are huge with info from that about where the IT leaders are taking us out there.
Here's on current example. This week, the Mozilla Firefox browser released Firefox 3, which on their site touts a quantum leap in smart surfing data processing which they say will replace bookmarks. It's all automatic, it learns how you surf and assembles all the information for you, specifically.
Sounds great, right? But a few weeks ago X went to one of those cutting edge 'dev cons' where the head of Mozilla gave a talk on it -- it turns out to be the thin edge of the wedge to store you local data remotely on a third party server.......
.
Well...we all know the motive for that. To insiders it was announced that this is where things will go next ---- it is being sold as 'perfect security', no more viruses, no more web bots or adware messing up your folders on C:drive ... because in a few years, they plan for nobody to have a C:drive. They want everybody's data stored on a third party server.
Right now, what's on your C: or D: drives can only be gotten by hacking into it. They are promising unhackable remote storage as standard for future home computing. The benefits to sell the notion is that without all those GB to hunt through on your local pc, the 'experience' will finally be shed of slow RAM, antivirus software, etc.
And sell it will. The public will beg for this now. Forgetting what everyone was concerned about in 1999 --- privacy.
How can people forget that the governments now have 100% access to any private data stored on any third party server???