Canadian Mom Protests Human Rights Abuse
March 14, 2011
In this day and age, who ever heard of a mother, an educated professional, being denied access to her children?
by "Desperate Mother"
(for henrymakow.com)
Imagine one day your children are taken away from their home, their bed, their familiar surroundings and neighbourhood, their mother against their will by a court order.
Imagine from that day forward, you are told you are not allowed to see, speak to, phone, interact with your children, freely again. You are told if you do, you will be breaking the law, would be in contempt of court, and could go to prison.
You don't know but can only assume that your children have been told the same.
Even though you know your children are suffering, heartbroken and traumatized by this unjust law (a court order is the law), anything you do to help your children is used against you.
Imagine that the few moments you are allowed with your children is under strict scrutiny and surveillance, called
'supervision'. This is for no reason you or your children can comprehend. Although you have never been a danger to or posed any kind of risk or harm to your children, the court has ordered you be supervised. Where every move, word and interaction between you and your children is written down by the stranger that is watching you. (A few supervised hours you are allowed a month with your children in a rule based, public-setting).
You have no right to know what your children have been told, why their mother was taken from them. You can only hope (and pray) that your relationship can be salvaged, after two years of only seeing them for one meager single weeks worth of supervised hours. (See movie Mother of Mine - which shows what a child does with that deep ache of loss.)
Can you believe this could happen in Canada to an educated Canadian woman in 2011 and her Canadian children? Well it's true, right here in the country that promotes itself as the defender of all Human Rights, especially to those 'other countries' with their unjust laws. (See movie Not Without My Child.)
I am competent, of sound mind, responsible, loving, dedicated and my children are desperate to be with me. A Court of Queen's Bench Judge who reigns supreme over vulnerable children's lives, has the exclusive authority to decide what is in a child's BEST INTEREST, without knowing the child at all, as a mother knows her own children. This is how the legistlation/laws in our country are set up. To virtually provide a Judge with dictatorial power over people's lives.
The Judge's "finding of fact" cannot ever be disputed within the legal system itself, not even through an appeal.
How can Canadian law still be used against children? To take innocent children away from their secure and loving attachments/relationships with their family members? To inhumanely sever the bond between these children and their mother by separating them indefinitely entirely against the child's will. This heartless action ignores the children's cries of distress for no reason these children can understand. Then they hear a Court of Queen's Bench Judge to refer to this being done to a child as in their 'best interest.'
If this mother and children assert their fundamental, God- given right to be together ( their freedom of association according to the Canadian Charter of Rights) the mother will be in contempt of court and face prison. That's how much power a Judge holds in our society. One must ask how Canada can promote itself as a defender of Human Rights when the most vulnerable members of our society, children have NO RIGHTS - not even the right according to the
UN International Law Convention of the Rights of the child, to be raised and nurtured by their mother who they need and love.
One has to wonder why the top ranking government officials, Ministers,Premier, MLA MP. Not even lawyers who can bleed people financially can do absolutely anything to stop these human rights violations. The hurt and trauma inflicted on innocent children is comparable to the what government did to countless First Nations children through residential schools. This policy was no doubt considered 'in their best interest'.
Family Court Judges have been given the authority by the Divorce Act (1985) to unilaterally define what is in
our/your child's best interests. Likewise, family members of First Nations children, taken to residential schools, were also threatened with prison if they did not comply.
In our country a Judge's orders cannot be disputed. Even if a citizen pays the high cost of legal fees for an appeal ($30,000 $40,000 typical). The fact that these children need and deserve their mother is irrelevant, while the law purports to uphold the best interest of the children. Judges are civil servants paid well, by working taxpayers, average $200,000 - $300,000 annual wages, and pension for life?
How did this noble and principled calling become an publically ordained position of 'infallibility'?
Is the Pope still 'infallible' after the exposure of hundreds of
thousands of innocent children suffering from the cover up of deviant priests, by the higher ranking officials in Catholic Church?
How can Canada speak up for and on behalf of the unjust laws in other countries and rights of people, including women and children denied, when Canadian politicians know the rights of many children (and their decent mothers) are being completely violated? Is this really a democratic country that upholds the Human and Constitutional Rights of every citizen?
George said (March 17, 2011):
in Scotland there is a case that defies belief of a 9 year old down syndrome child called holly greig who alleges that she is being abused by top judges and police chiefs and social workers despite protests on the capital streets . reporters have been arrested on route to marches sweep it under the carpet seems to be the norm .ex pms tony blair & gordon brown to have had allegations thrown at them. the mind boggles lol