September 1, 2008

GREAT SHOW Henry.  Articulate guy -- he ("Michael") understands what they're doing to him very clearly.

Poor guy!  He put it perfectly though, "she tries to wear the pants but they don't fit right".    That's the sad truth for everyone in these situations, even when the woman has the upper hand (because of the full authority of the new laws and courts behind her), it doesn't make the pants 'fit right'. 

I can't entirely blame these women personally for this madness.  They've been brainwashed all their lives, as their moms were brainwashed, and the years are getting along to the point you'd have to back to deceased great grandmothers to find the last woman in a girl's family who could have told her what marriage is, what love it, explained men and women and what it's all about, in a natural world.  A human world.

Read Lord Bertrand Russell.  Read Dewey, read Trotsky, Lenin.  They wrote that for a ruling elite to achieve global control,  the first thing that would have to be achieved that had never been done before.   The family unit had to be destroyed. How to do it?

1. Separate children from parents to be put in state schools at least 5 hours per day at the earliest age possible. Result: children learn what the State wants them to learn,  and ignore parental inputs.  And later become violently opposed to parental inputs.

2. Encourage sexual experimentation at the earliest age possible.  Result:  makes deep bonding impossible for the rest of that person's life.

3. Saturate the society with cheap booze, drugs, and condone pornography, promiscuity, and homosexuality..

4. Ridicule marriage, render it meaningless, take it away from the authority of the temples, and hand it over to the legal profession to exploit through divorce cases.

5. Emasculate the males, and empower the females with the full weight of the state behind it.

He's right -- he can't 'roll over' to charges like this.  Once they get a judgment it'll follow him the rest of his life.

I used to think that was just a flaw in the system.  But I understand the system much better now - they don't make mistakes.  Those people who tend to get plowed under by it -- it's designed for them.

Why wreck a basically nice guy's life like this?
Because he was a man.  He dared wear the pants.
Basically they're giving such men troubles to prevent them from having families------children, and sons.

You know, you should write another book for the young fellows about how to choose a wife these days.   One wrong move they could end up in prison!   Always pick a naturally 'service oriented' girl.  There are plenty of 'em, still.  I think the young men simply don't know that's what their supposed to look for in women.

I think he made the same error that a lot of us did - I remember I ditched the ones who would have been good wives for 'intelligence'. What did I think showed intellect in a woman?
 
Quoting Jack Kerouac or Anais Nin.  A taste for snob appeal jazz or atonal music.  Being into 'finding herself', through yoga, zen, or LSD. Neurosis... a touch of nymphomania... and the mental gymnastics ability to argue over absolutely nothing  till the sun comes up.

Yeah, right.  Great recipe for a woman to be the mother of your progeny, and spend the rest of your life with...

I was conditioned to be blind of the better traits in a few other girls who's hearts I broke, just because they had no plans for college - they were wanting children, and saw the family they dreamed of as the entire focus for their future life.   How wrong I was to have let myself be brainwashed into trivializing that role as 'dumb'.

It's natural for males to want to be 'of the world', to be intellectual, thinkers.  The biggest con ever was to convince young men during the 50's and 60's that we wanted women that were like us!  Worldly.
 
In real life, sooner or later a man of the world wants nothing better than a home to go to at the end of the day where he's received lovingly, and can set aside heavy thinking, competition, and power struggles for a while -- in his own home. 

They couldn't tell you who Jung or Nietzsche was - but now I know that kind of knowledge and a few bucks will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks.

I've never forgotten a little book I ordered in 1976.  I saw a cheap back section ad in Penthouse (yeah, I used to 'read' it during the '70's), just a NY post office address, and bold header, all caps.  'HOW TO PICK UP GIRLS'.  Ten bucks.  Being twenty one I ordered it without hesitation.

I wasn't disappointed. It was a generic printing, just white flimsy paperback with black helvetica title, about 90 pages.  It read like the young hustler who wrote it just sat down and wrote it out off the top of his head -- most of it mild braggadocio and little personal anecdotes.  But he delivered the basic facts that had already fallen through the cracks for most young men of my generation.

And the facts are:
1. men and women are different by nature. Not merely physiologically, but think and feel differently.

2. women have no gender attraction at all to men who are 'like' them.  They see such men as 'neuter'. (I think the term the writer used was 'wimps' or 'losers').

3. a woman never feels 'understood' by a man who asks them just explain themselves to him.  They feel understood by a man who calls them on their subtle 'tests' whether she likes it or not.  A man who'll drop her like a bad habit for trying to get the upper hand,  can just walk away. Girls lose attraction instantly when pursued by a male. 

That's not all the facts of life of course, but the young man only promised to set the reader straight on what attracts women initially and what's been turned backwards.  Things any male should understand all along no matter how young, and used to.  But now this is a society with far too many boys growing up fatherless, or with the father held at a distance due to divorce.