henrymakow.com http://www.henrymakow.com/ en Copyright 2010 Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:30:53 +0000 http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.25 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss The Gig is Up. com
]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/the_gig_is_up_com.html http://www.henrymakow.com/the_gig_is_up_com.html News Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:30:53 +0000 A Young Man's Escape from America swami_vivekananda1.jpgby Caitanya Dasa  (ccananza@hotmail.com)

I am 25 years old. I was born and grew up in a suburb of Dallas, Texas. I went to an expensive private school for most of my schooling. I got my first car at age 16, my second car at age 17, my third car at age 18, my fourth car at age 19. I lived in a very expensive neighborhood where the average annual income was $100,000 dollars.

In other words, I had the American dream and much more. I had written four books by age 20. I could have potentially gotten into any upper class university I wanted, if I had chosen that route. Even though I had so much wealth materially, I did not feel satisfied and I began asking philosophical and spiritual questions about life.

Around age 20, I started reading Srila Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada's translation of Bhagavad-Gita www.asitis.com, and it very quickly answered all of the questions I was asking, questions that I did not even have the ability to conceive, and dispelled a few philosophical misconceptions as well.

I quickly renounced all of the riches and material wealth I had, and became a celibate monk of the Gaudiya Vaisnava order at age 21. I donned the saffron robes that monks of both the Hindu and Buddhist traditions wear. I traveled around America for the next two years, distributing Bhagavad-Gitas at different colleges and universities. Internally I was experiencing tremendous spiritual happiness and felt all of my material attachments and conditioning gradually disappearing.

INDIA

Around age 23, I finally did something that I had always wanted to do- I went to India to live. It was quite a big cultural shift, but I felt at home here in India. In America, I had felt like an outsider, someone who didn't fit in. As soon as I stepped off the plane in Bangalore, I felt like I was home finally.

Over the course of the next three years, I traveled all over India and saw many holy places. Vrindavan, Krishna's birthplace, south of Delhi, made a particularly strong impression on me. Now I have decided to settle down in south India, stop traveling, and leave behind the monk way of life.

All throughout this whole journey, as I studied different Vedic scriptures, especially Srimad-Bhagavatam, I began to experience an internal change of heart, something that many saints and spiritual leaders in many different religions have tried to express and explain.

Bhakti means devotion, devotion to God. The goal of religion is to develop love of God, a state of being that Hindus call prema. God is one, although different religions may call Him by different names such as Allah, Krishna, Christ, and so on. The goal of religion is one, which is to try to become a humble servant of the Supreme Lord.

CHANGES

Why am I leaving the monk way of life? That is a difficult question to answer, one that many monks of whatever tradition or order eventually have to ask themselves. At first reaction, most people assume it is because of a physical agitation, the desire to engage in sexual intercourse. In most cases, that is not it at all.

The desire to have a family, to have a loving wife, is a natural desire and emotion of any balanced and healthy human being. To artificially renounce women will not work. Women make up half of the world and thus to try to renounce or avoid them is not really possible, unless you live on an island where only male monks live. And even then, the desires still remain in the mind, so it is usually futile.

Do I have any regrets about becoming a monk for 5 years of my life? Not at all! It has been a tremendous period of growth, one that I feel was absolutely necessary.

I have no regrets at all about having lived as a monk, but as the character in Herman Hesse's Siddhartha book realized, he needed to move on and learn how to become a human again, how to become part of the world again. Temporary celibacy or monk life for 2 or 3 years can be tremendously beneficial to a person's spiritual development. But lifelong celibacy is practically impossible in this modern age.

What do I plan to do now? I plan to live a very simple and peaceful in a rural village in south India, living an agrarian based lifestyle. There are a couple of Americans living there already and are engaging the local villagers in different ways. So there is already a pre-existing framework there, but still, I will make a little bit of money from various things, and I will also live as simply as possible, so I do not foresee requiring a great deal of money. This is an issue I have thought of before, and one that I am presently working on.

The way of life in rural India is very different from the lifestyle of the fast paced Western countries. It is difficult to all of a sudden shift gears, so to speak, and change from a passionate and fast paced lifestyle to a more simple and peaceful one, but I have faith that I can make the change and learn how to live naturally and in harmony with nature and God.

In these turbulent and uncertain times, when the world is being ripped apart by war, social unrest, famine, crime, and chaos in general,------- people of all religions, whether they are a Christian, Hindu, Jew, Buddhist, Muslim, or whatever else, must come together in unity and realize that we are all children of the same Supreme Father, and thus we are all a part of the same family. We are all God's children, and when we realize this, then there can be peace.
----

(Editor's Note: I'd like to hear from other Americans/westerners who have "escaped" their countries of origin. hmakow@gmail.com)




]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/by_caitanya_dasa_ccananzahotma.html http://www.henrymakow.com/by_caitanya_dasa_ccananzahotma.html Guest Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:56:16 +0000 Zionists Determine Good and Evil dershowitz-020410.jpg

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Alan Dershowitz (left) recently called Richard Goldstone "an evil man" for censuring Israel's Dec. 2008 Gaza War in his UN Report.

If God is synonymous with absolute truth and justice, Dershowitz exposes Zionism as a war on God.  Zionists turn good and evil on their head, and define "good" as whatever benefits them.

This is the New World Order folks; "Good" is "what's Good for the Jews."

Speaking on Israeli Army Radio Jan. 31, Alan Dershowitz called Goldstone a "traitor."

He is "using his Jewishness to malign Israel...He is an evil man, one who allowed himself to be used against the Jewish people, an absolute traitor."

Goldstone accused both Israel and Hamas of war crimes but singled Israel out for inflicting a "collective punishment" on civilians.

In "Operation Cast Lead," (Dec 24 2008- Jan 21, 2009) Israel killed 1400 Palestinians, 80% of whom were civilians, the majority women and children. Over 5000 more were wounded. 22,000 structures and 280 schools were destroyed. About 200 Factories and 700 Businesses Damaged. Eight hospitals and 26 clinics were destroyed.

This was in retaliation for the death of four Israelis in all of 2008 from Hamas "rockets." (Another four died from rockets during the conflict.)

In January and February 2008 alone, 63 Israelis died in road accidents.  
That's 378 on an annualized basis.

richard-goldstone.jpg(Richard Goldstone, left)

Just as 378 fatalities are the price of driving, four deaths in 2008 from rockets is a small price for stealing a whole country and confining over a million refugees to an open air prison.

But let a few Jews question Israel's savagery and they are "traitors...evil [men.]"

If Zionists like Dershowitz want to get metaphysical, surely they represent evil, and are the greatest threat to world peace.


SUBJECTIVITY

In his book "Sex and Character," (1903), Austrian Jewish philosopher Otto Weininger compared Jews to women in that some are incapable of moral objectivity or intellectual honesty. They don't seem to understand that good and evil, truth and untruth, are independent of them, their dictate or interests.

As the self-chosen leaders of a self-chosen people, Zionists have a mission to reorganize the world and reality itself. The Illuminati bankers, many of whom are Jewish or part-Jewish, are tapping into this tendency to play God and turn reality upside down.

As God usurpers, organized Jewry is incapable of admitting doing wrong, or that anti-Semitism is the result. Why should they? They are God. They would sooner convince the whole world it is wrong.

I was living in Israel Feb 21,1973 when the Israelis shot down a Lybian airliner killing 105 passengers. The plane had accidentally strayed into the Sinai. I was appalled by the self pitying hand wringing and mealy mouthed excuses. "We'd look into your blue eyes and do it all over again," one commentator wrote. I didn't stay.

"UNDERDOG"

In a recent article, Robert Fisk remarks on the Israeli need to play underdog always at the edge of annihilation.

"Forget Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and the 15,000 Lebanese and Palestinian dead. Forget the Sabra and Shatila massacre that same year by Israel's militia allies as their troops watched. Erase the Qana massacre of 1996 - 106 Lebanese killed by Israeli shellfire, more than half of them children - and delete the 1,500 in the 2006 Lebanon war...- if you believe the security elite of Israel's right wing here in Herzliya - [Israel] is now under an even more dangerous, near-unprecedented attack."

Despite having over 200 nuclear bombs, Israel fans this hysteria better to wage an endless war of aggression. Ordinary Israelis feel they have no choice but fight. (See, my "The Zionist Protection Racket.")

Jews are on the defensive because they think they're hated for no reason. They think that to admit wrong would justify their extermination. Not true. Many Jews are agents and scapegoats for the agenda of the Illuminati Jewish bankers. No one wants to exterminate them, but anti-Semitism will grow as the New World Order becomes more apparent and more onerous.


CONCLUSION

As a Jew, I am tired of Zionists defining the Jewish interest; tired of their relentless distortion of truth.

I am sick of the US Congress and media towing the Zionist line; sick of how Zionists manufacture anti-Semitism to make Jews conform.

The New World Order is redefining reality (Good and Evil) in terms of the Illuminati banker agenda. Jews (Neocons, Liberals,Communists, Socialists, Feminists) have been brainwashed to advance their world government agenda and to destroy all collective identity, i.e. race, religion, nation and family (gender.)

Ordinary Jews will take the fall. If they remain complacent, they'll have no one to blame but themselves. But I'm thankful for righteous Jews like Richard Goldstone who recognize truth and have the courage to tell it.

----
Makow--On the July-August 2006 Lebanon War

"Gaza in Plain Language" (YouTube)

More Gaza Background   (YouTube)


]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/zionists_define_good_and_evil.html http://www.henrymakow.com/zionists_define_good_and_evil.html Zionism Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:45:19 +0000
Mengele, MK-Ultra in Canada
]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/mk-ultra_in_canada.html http://www.henrymakow.com/mk-ultra_in_canada.html News Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:49:07 +0000 Defending Yourself Against "Legal Fiction" corporate_personhood3.gif(Editor's Note: Again, I don't pretend to understand this "legal fiction" argument, and welcome clarifications by knowledgeable readers.)

by Rino

The 'false allegation' industry also exists here in Australia. We need to draw back the curtain and begin to pay attention to the man behind the curtain.

There are critical points to understand. Once the world went off the Gold standard, the people now in effect became dead to the Law.. All courts are courts belonging the central banks, being the creditor in any case. A Judge cannot see the substantive Law in relation to a man or woman's God-given rights anymore under public policy. Public policy refers to the bankruptcy/insolvency of that nation.
 
All charges are against the created Birth Certificate Trust estate/prepaid account recognized by the all capital letter name.

The person who is charged is NOT the man but his corporate entity account. All the courts want is to settle a public account and they want access to your Birth Certificate trust/prepaid estate account.

When you argue/defend and a claim, which in commerce is a demand for money, you are in effect saying 'I don't want to pay' and at this point of dishonour there may be more bogus charges/claims come forward due to this. So all legislative acts apply only to these corporate persons, individuals, taxpayers, residents, etc.; and guess what, they are all created fictions of law. They are not real they are created fictions of law.
 
The idea is not to argue/defend because the living man or woman is not even named as a party in any court action, only the birth certificate/Corporate Trust entity is named.

That is why it is said that 'arguments are for fools'. This information applies in Canada, Australia, America and anywhere else where a central bank exists.

So what happens when there is a 'Charge' against someone? An account is created and it must be settled otherwise someone is placed in prison as collateral for that debt. Arguing and defending creates problems.
 
This is what they do when they create a charge. The courts/agencies use the important concept/principle of 'Bankers Acceptance law'. It is the important concept and principle of primary liability.  The newly created charge is created by the 'maker' of the instrument, i.e, lawyer, agency, court or any other third party entity and the bankers acceptance law goes like this, 'The primary liability to 'pay' an instrument rests with the maker ( i.e lawyer, agency, prosecutor, court etc) of that instrument UNLESS someone else (The charged entity) refuses (argues or defends) to pay.

Under the rules of Admiralty Law, he who brings forward a charge must also bring forward the remedy and that remedy is your birth Certificate/Trust prepaid asset account. The reason they 'falsely charge' people is because they are well aware of the existence of this Trust account and you are deemed to be in control of your estate, operating as a Trustee of that account.

However they will never openly admit to this under public policy and they will always remain silent and refer you to some legislative act and make you think it applies to you.
 
When they say to you that 'anything you say can and will be used against you', what they are really saying is be careful how you respond to our presentment/claims because you may not know what it is that we are really asking of you!

They know and understand that all energy comes from the living man who in reality is the creditor, however if you create dishonour they will treat you as the debtor and the debtor has no rights.

What is the false allegation industry really all about? It is proof that you have in fact an prepaid Trust/estate account created at your birth and evidenced by your birth Certificate. Your birth certificate is evidence of two things: 1) that a Trust does in fact exist and 2) it is a security, which is used as collateral by any government to receive funding from the central banks.
 
If you understand that the Bible tells us not to charge your 'brother' because you make a debtor of him and this is why those in power know and understand this concept. This is why they created the fiction corporate entity because it is supposed to protect/buffer you.

Once Adam and Eve dishonoured the creator, they were taken out of the Garden of Eden which was no longer a commercial free zone and absolutely everything that is done, is done in commerce involving commercial accounts.

Ever since then the same principle has applied, creditors are winners and debtors are losers! Were we not told to be the 'head' (creditor) and not the 'tail' (debtor)? Its all about an account, the rest is all illusion, just ask for the bill so that you can do a bankers acceptance by your endorsement of the charging instrument/complaint and proceed to settle and close the account. However be prepared they will test you first.
 
We as living people no longer know or understand who we are and everything has been inverted upside down. We have lost our identities and once again have given away our birthright for "bowl of pottage."
 ----

First Comment: Paul

Greetings Henry,

In our work to date, we have come across these claims
several times:  it's important to realize that some of them
can be substantiated with good authority, while others
appear to be theories that have somehow "morphed" into fact
primarily for the one(s) asserting such claims.


These two short essays are good places to begin,
to acquire a necessary foundation:

http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/cracking.title.28.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm
(Note well that the U.S. Supreme Court has held that
the Federal government is NOT a corporation!)


Our letter to Bill Gates re: USA v. Microsoft, Inc.
goes into many similar issues:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/microsoft/transmittal.htm


In actual litigation we have already established that the entity
"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" incorporated twice in Delaware,
but both corporations were later revoked by the Delaware
Secretary of State:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/registered.agent.2007-02-12.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/registered.agent.2007-02-12.gif

When this fraud was exposed by our office,
The Conspiracy (of which you write so often),
re-incorporated "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
also in Delaware, as if adding "THE" would cure the manifold
problems that resulted from impersonating the Federal government
with a Delaware corporation, when both are legally "foreign"
with respect to each other:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/THE.UNITED.STATES.OF.AMERICA.JPG


Legally speaking, all corporations chartered in any of the 50 States are
"foreign" corporations with respect to the District of Columbia:

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chaptr11.htm

Foreign corporation. 
A corporation doing business in one state though chartered
or incorporated in another state is a foreign corporation as to the first state, and,
as such, is required to consent to certain conditions and restrictions
in order to do business in such first state.


Now, we went the next step and inquired with a sample of
Secretaries of State in other States of the Union, and
all confirmed that UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
failed to register as a "foreign" corporation with their offices:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/al/
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/al/usa.corp.certificate.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/al/usa.inc.certificate.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/ca/
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/ca/usa.corp.certificate.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/ca/usa.inc.certificate.gif


This next one, domiciled in Washington State, is likewise quite deceptive:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/wa/Corporations%20Registration%20Detail.htm

UNITED ESTATES OF AMERICA, LLC


The use of "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" [sic] as the "Plaintiff"
on all Federal criminal "INDICTMENTS", and on all Federal civil cases, initiated by the U.S. Department of Justice, appears to be an expertly concealed attempt to avoid invoking the Judicial Power of the United States, by which the U.S. Constitution very clearly requires that the "United States" (Federal government) be the Proper Party:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#3:2:1

Instead, they are invoking the legislative power of the United States (Federal government) chiefly by convening a legislative tribunal instead of a constitutional court.


A much longer, and much more detailed explanation, can be
found in these two briefs which I filed at the U.S. Supreme Court,
to which 48 UNlicensed ATTORNeys either fell silent, or
formally waived their clients' right to answer:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/cert.htm#drama
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/mandamus.2.htm

Soon after filing those 2 briefs at the U.S. Supreme Court,
Justice O'Connor retired and Chief Justice Rehnquist died.
Also, Ginsburg, Thomas and Breyer turned up withOUT
PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSIONS:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/letter.2004-02-12/letter01.gif


Lastly, there is some documentary evidence to support
the notion that parties who are in fact at war with each other
may not refer formally to each other by their Proper Names;
instead a "nom de guerre" is a customary legal requirement
under the Law of Nations.  For authorities in support of
this proposition, see:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/barber/2-A-MEMORANDUM%20OF%20LAW.htm



]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/defending_yourself_against_leg.html http://www.henrymakow.com/defending_yourself_against_leg.html Guest Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:31:46 +0000 Illuminati Web sites



http://www.clubofrome.org/eng/home/

http://www.clubmadrid.org/

http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/

http://www.isgp.eu/organisations/1001_Club.htm

https://www.cosmosclub.org/

https://www.cosmosclub.org/Default.aspx?pageindex=1&pageid=31&status=1

http://www.esalen.org/

http://www.rothschild.com/

http://www.rothschildfoundation.eu/

http://www.rothschild.info/start.asp

http://www.rothschild.info/home/

http://www.edmond-de-rothschild.com/default-en.aspx

And how about Apostate Zionist Israel & Rothschild???

http://www.edris.co.il/
המובילות MORNING STAR ו-S&P. לרשותך עומדים צוותי השקעות מהמובילים
בענף ההשקעות בארץ ובעולם הנשענים על מסורת של ביצועים, שירות ואיכות חסרת
פשרות המאפיינים את קבוצת רוטשילד ב 200
http://www.edris.co.il/ItemPics/LCFRothschildIsrael.pdf


]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/illuminati_web_siteshttpwwwclu.html http://www.henrymakow.com/illuminati_web_siteshttpwwwclu.html Letters Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:07:50 +0000 Revisiting the Flubbed Presidential Oath
]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/revisiting_the_flubbed_preside.html http://www.henrymakow.com/revisiting_the_flubbed_preside.html News Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:34:53 +0000 American Gulag -- Feminist Laws Persecute Men familylaw.jpg"We shall regulate mechanically all the actions of the political life of our subjects by new laws."  Protocols of Zion- 5


by Stephen Baskerville Ph.D.

(Abridged by Henry Makow)


Men accused of rape today enjoy few safeguards. "People can be charged with virtually no evidence," says Boston former sex-crimes prosecutor Rikki Klieman. "If a female comes in and says she was sexually assaulted, then on her word alone, with nothing else -- and I mean nothing else, no investigation -- the police will go out and arrest someone."

Almost daily we see men released after decades in prison because DNA testing proves they were wrongly convicted. Yet the rape industry is so powerful that proof of innocence is no protection.

"A defendant who can absolutely prove his innocence ... can nonetheless still be convicted, based solely on the word of the accuser," write Stuart Taylor and K.C. Johnson in Until Proven Innocent. In North Carolina, simply "naming the person accused" along with the time and place "will support a verdict of guilty." Crime laboratories are notorious for falsifying results to obtain convictions.

'WOMEN NEVER LIE'

The feminist dogma that "women never lie" goes largely unchallenged. "Any honest veteran sex assault investigator will tell you that rape is one of the most falsely reported crimes," says Craig Silverman, a former Colorado prosecutor known for zealous prosecutions. Purdue University sociologist Eugene Kanin found that "41% of the total disposed rape cases were officially declared false" during a nine-year period, "that is, by the complainant's admission that no rape had occurred."

In the infamous Duke University lacrosse case, prosecutor Michael Nifong suppressed exculpating evidence and prosecuted men he knew to be innocent, according to Taylor and Johnson. Nifong himself was eventually disbarred, but he had willing accomplices among assistant prosecutors, police, crime lab technicians, judges, the bar, and the media.

"Innocent men are arrested and even imprisoned as a result of bogus claims," writes Linda Fairstein, former head of the sex-crimes unit for the Manhattan District Attorney, who estimates that half of all reports are unfounded.

Innocence projects are almost wholly occupied with rape cases (though they try to disguise this fact). Yet no systematic investigation has been undertaken by the media or civil libertarians into why so many innocent citizens are so easily incarcerated on fabricated allegations. The exoneration of the Duke students on obviously trumped-up charges triggered few investigations -- and no official ones -- to determine how widespread such rigged justice is against those unable to garner media attention.

MEDIA COMPLICITY

The world of rape accusations displays features similar to other feminist gender crimes: media invective against the accused, government-paid "victim advocates" to secure convictions, intimidation of anyone who defends the accused. "Nobody dependent on the mainstream media for information about rape would have any idea how frequent false claims are," write Taylor and Johnson.

"Most journalists simply ignore evidence contradicting the feminist line." What they observe of rape characterizes feminist justice generally: "calling a rape complainant 'the victim' -- with no 'alleged'." "Unnamed complainants are labeled 'victims' even before legal proceedings determine that a crime has been committed," according to CMR.

Rape hysteria, false accusations, and distorted scholarship are rampant on university campuses, which ostensibly exist to pursue truth. "If a woman did falsely accuse a man of rape," opines one "women's studies" graduate, "she may have had reasons to. Maybe she wasn't raped, but he clearly violated her in some way."

This mentality pervades feminist jurisprudence, precluding innocence by obliterating the distinction between crime and hurt feelings. A Vassar College assistant dean believes false accusations foster men's education: "I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration.... 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?'"

Conservative critics of the Duke fiasco avoided feminism's role but instead emphasized race -- a minor feature of the case but a safer one to criticize. Little evidence indicates that white people are being systematically incarcerated on fabricated accusations of non-existent crimes against blacks. This is precisely what is happening to men, both white and black, accused of rape and other "gender" crimes that feminists have turned into a political agenda.


DOMESTIC VIOLENCE = PROSECUTION OF MALES

Like rape, domestic "violence" is defined so loosely that it need not be violent. The U.S. Justice Department definition includes "extreme jealousy and possessiveness" and "name calling and constant criticizing."

For such "crimes" men are jailed with no trial. In fact, the very category of "domestic" violence was developed largely to circumvent due process requirements of conventional assault statutes. A study published in Criminology and Public Policy found that no one accused of domestic violence could be found innocent, since every arrestee received punishment.

Here, too, false accusations are rewarded. "Women lie every day," attests Ottawa Judge Dianne Nicholas. "Every day women in court say, 'I made it up. I'm lying. It didn't happen' -- and they're not charged."

Amazingly, bar associations sponsor seminars instructing women how to fabricate accusations. Thomas Kiernan, writing in the New Jersey Law Journal, expressed his astonishment at "the number of women attending the seminars who smugly -- indeed boastfully -- announced that they had already sworn out false or grossly exaggerated domestic violence complaints against their hapless husbands, and that the device worked!" He added, "The lawyer-lecturers invariably congratulated the self-confessed miscreants."

Domestic violence has become "a backwater of tautological pseudo-theory," write Donald Dutton and Kenneth Corvo in Aggression and Violent Behavior. "No other area of established social welfare, criminal justice, public health, or behavioral intervention has such weak evidence in support of mandated practice."

FALSE CLAIMS A STRATEGY

Scholars and practitioners have repeatedly documented how "allegations of abuse are now used for tactical advantage" in custody cases and "become part of the gamesmanship of divorce." Domestic abuse has become "an area of law mired in intellectual dishonesty and injustice," according to the Rutgers Law Review.

Restraining orders removing men from their homes and children are summarily issued without any evidence. Due process protections are so routinely ignored that, the New Jersey Law Journal reports, one judge told his colleagues, "Your job is not to become concerned about the constitutional rights of the man that you're violating."

 Attorney David Heleniak calls New Jersey's statute "a due process fiasco" in the Rutgers Law Review. New Jersey court literature openly acknowledges that due process is ignored because it "perpetuates the cycle of power and control whereby the [alleged?] perpetrator remains the one with the power and the [alleged?] victim remains powerless." Omitting "alleged" is standard even in statutes, where, the Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly reports, "the mere allegation of domestic abuse ... may shift the burden of proof to the defendant."

Special "integrated domestic violence courts" presume guilt and then, says New York's openly feminist chief judge, "make batterers and abusers take responsibility for their actions." They can seize property, including homes, without the accused being convicted or even formally charged or present to defend himself.

Lawyer Walter Fox describes these courts as "pre-fascist": "Domestic violence courts ... are designed to get around the protections of the criminal code. The burden of proof is reduced or removed, and there's no presumption of innocence."

Forced confessions are widespread. Pennsylvania men are incarcerated unless they sign forms stating, "I have physically and emotionally battered my partner." The man must then describe the violence, even if he insists he committed none. "I am responsible for the violence I used," the forms declare. "My behavior was not provoked."

CHILD SUPPORT CHOKE-HOLD

Equally feminist is the child-support machinery, whereby millions have their family finances plundered and their lives placed under penal supervision without having committed any legal infraction. Once they have nothing left to loot, they too are incarcerated without trial.

Contrary to government propaganda (and Common Law tradition), child support today has little to do with fathers abandoning their children, deserting their marriages, or even agreeing to a divorce. It is automatically assessed on all non-custodial parents, even those involuntarily divorced without grounds ("no-fault"). It is an entitlement for all divorcing mothers, regardless of their actions, and coerced from fathers, regardless of their fidelity.

The "deadbeat dad" is far less likely to be a man who abandoned the offspring he callously sired than to be a loving father who has been, as attorney Jed Abraham writes in From Courtship to Courtroom, "forced to finance the filching of his own children."

Federalized enforcement was rationalized to reimburse taxpayers for welfare. Under feminist pressure, taxpayers instead subsidize middle-class divorce, through federal payments to states based on the amount of child support they collect. By profiting off child support at federal taxpayer expense, state governments have a financial incentive to encourage as many single-mother homes as possible. They, in turn, encourage divorce with a guaranteed, tax-free windfall to any divorcing mother.

While child support (like divorce itself) is awarded ostensibly without reference to "fault," nonpayment brings swift and severe punishments. "The advocates of ever-more-aggressive measures for collecting child support," writes Bryce Christensen of Southern Utah University, "have moved us a dangerous step closer to a police state."


GULAG FOR 'DEADBEAT DADS'

... Assembly-line hearings can last 30 seconds to two minutes, during which parents are sentenced to months or years in prison. Many receive no hearing but are accused in an "expedited judicial process" before a black-robed lawyer known as a "judge surrogate."

 Because these officials require no legislative confirmation, they are not accountable to citizens or their representatives. Unlike true judges, they may lobby to create the same laws they adjudicate, violating the separation of powers. Often they are political activists in robes. One surrogate judge, reports the Telegraph of Hudson, New Hampshire, simultaneously worked "as a radical feminist lobbying on proposed legislation" dealing with child support.

Though governments sensationalize "roundups" of alleged "deadbeat dads," who are jailed for months and even years without trial, no government information whatever is available on incarcerations.

The Bureau of Justice Statistics is utterly silent on child-support incarcerations. Rebecca May of the Center for Family Policy and Practice found "ample testimony by low-income non-custodial parents of spending time in jail for the nonpayment of child support." Yet she could find no documentation of their incarceration...

We know the arrests are extensive. To relieve jail overcrowding in Georgia, a sheriff and judge proposed creating detention camps specifically for "deadbeat dads." The Pittsburgh City Planning Commission has considered a proposal "to convert a former chemical processing plant ... into a detention center" for "deadbeat dads."

Rendered permanently in debt by incarceration, fathers are farmed out to trash companies and similar concerns, where they work 14-16 hour days with their earnings confiscated.
 

MORE MALICIOUS MAYHEN

Other incarcerations are also attributable to feminism. The vast preponderance of actual violent crime and substance abuse proceeds from single-parent homes and fatherless children more than any other factor, far surpassing race and poverty. The explosion of single parenthood is usually and resignedly blamed on paternal abandonment, with the only remedy being ever-more draconian but ineffective child-support "crackdowns."

Yet no evidence indicates that the proliferation of single-parent homes results from absconding fathers. If instead we accept that single motherhood is precisely what feminists say it is -- the deliberate choice of their sexual revolution -- it is then apparent that sexual liberation lies behind not only these newfangled sexual crimes, but also the larger trend of actual crime and incarceration. Feminism is driving both the criminalization of the innocent and the criminality of the guilty.

We will continue to fight a losing battle against crime, incarceration, and expansive government power until we confront the sexual ideology that is driving not only family breakdown and the ensuing social anomie, but the criminalization of the male population.

Ever-more-repressive penal measures will only further erode freedom. Under a leftist regime, conservatives must rethink their approach to crime and punishment and their unwitting collusion with America's homegrown Stalinists.


Stephen Baskerville is associate professor of government at Patrick Henry College and author of Taken Into Custody: The War Against Fathers, Marriage, and the Family.


----

Feminist defector Erin Pizzy on Feminism

 

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3Vux-_9yRY

Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxiWqRFfg6w

 



]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/america_-_feminisms_gulag.html http://www.henrymakow.com/america_-_feminisms_gulag.html Guest Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:50:30 +0000 Ads from the Good ole Days
]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/ads_from_the_good_ole.html http://www.henrymakow.com/ads_from_the_good_ole.html News Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:54:04 +0000 Demoralization is Weapon in Secret War-- KGB Defector Bezmenov.jpg By Toby Moreland

The Soviet Union was a front for the alliance between international bankers and the British Empire.  Marxist-Leninist ideology is illegitimate to the core; it is a tool used in the process of "ideological subversion," a method of weakening independent nations and ultimately turning them into socialist "democracies" under internationalist control."

In a 1980's interview with G. Edward Griffin, Yuri Bezmenov, KGB defector and expert in propaganda,  said the subversion methods employed in the U.S. by the KGB were designed to "change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that - despite the abundance of information - no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country."

This multi-stage process requires media complicity/mediocrity, control of educational policy, widespread corruption in politics and industry, and the unlimited money/credit of the international bankers who funded and controlled the USSR.

Scrupulous and influential opponents are discredited, threatened or murdered.  It goes very slowly, and its purpose is to eventually bring the target nation to total collapse, when efficient shifts of power structure and economy can take place.

It is important to understand that the goal of ideological subversion is NOT to convert everyone to the left.  Leftist ideology must only be presented as a legitimate alternative for the subversion to be successful.  The Hegelian dialectic does the rest, and when the economic structure deteriorates within the target nation, the subverted population - divided, dumbed down, short-sighted and reactive - will beg for the expansion of government programs.

ComradeObama.jpgAccording to Bezmenov, the first stage of this process - demoralization - usually takes 15 to 20 years because this is the amount of time it takes to educate a single generation of students. In the United States, the super-patsy, this process has continued uninterrupted for at least 50 years.  It has been applied in any area of society where public opinion is formulated. 

Bezmenov said that about 80-85% of the KGB's resources, money, and manpower went toward this subversion process.  They recruited journalists, filmmakers, actors, musicians, activists, etc.  He said many KGB agents were exchange students.

Here are a few examples of application from Bezmenov's lecture in Los Angeles in 1983:

Religion - "Destroy it.  Ridicule it.  Replace it with various sex cults which bring people's attention, faith - whether it is naive or primitive - it doesn't really matter.  As long as the basically accepted religious dogma is slowly eroded and people are divorced from the Supreme Being. Replace accepted, respected religious organizations with fake organizations.  Distract people's attention from the real faith, and attract them to various different faiths." (without any unifying philosophy, important discussions are held exclusively in the realm of humanistic materialism, which clearly favors the central bankers and is always subject to change at their whim.)

Education - "Distract them from learning something which is constructive, pragmatic, efficient.  Instead of mathematics, physics, foreign languages, chemistry...teach them history of urban warfare, natural foods, home economy, your sexuality...anything.  As long as it takes you away..."  (U.S. students rank near the bottom of developed nations in math and science testing, despite having spent more money per pupil than any other nation.  See Charlotte Iserbyt's The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America)

Social Life - "Replace traditionally established institutions and organizations with fake organizations.  Take away the initiative from people.  Take away the responsibility from naturally established links between individuals, groups of individuals, and society at large, and replace them with artificially, bureaucratically controlled bodies...the main concern of social workers is not your family, not you, not social relations between groups of people.  The main concern is to get their paycheck from the government.  What will be the result of their social work doesn't really matter." (i.e Replacing individual accountability with bureaucratic bodies that are not held accountable, ...this is the Soviet council form of government.)

Media - "Who elected them?  How come they have almost monopolistic power over your mind?  They can rape your mind. But how come they have the nerve to decide what is good and what is bad for the ELECTED - by you - president and his administration.  Who the hell are they?  Spiro Agnew, who was hated by the liberal left, called them 'a bunch of enfeebled snobs,' and that's exactly what they are.  They think they know.  They don't."

Feminism - "I don't know how you feel about feminism.  I don't think that to be equal with men you have to politicize your movement.  You cannot legislate equality; you have to BE equal.  But that distracts your mind from real issues: family, loyalty, and moral foundations."

In a nut shell, this process destroys, weakens, or simply replaces any existing organizations and institutions that work for the nation's own interests.  Sane individuals with a sense of history understand that people in power cannot be trusted, hence the checks, balances, limitations and unalienable individual rights provided by our Constitution.  A belief in Marxist-Leninist ideology (state tyranny) requires a child-like hope for benevolent dictators that care about the interests of everyone.  History shows that these are disposable mouthpieces of world government.

Co-founder of the World Federation for Mental Health and friend of UN Charter author and Soviet spy Alger Hiss, Dr. Brock Chisholm, nailed it when he said, "To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, and religious dogmas..."

If We Had A Choice

Bezmenov concluded his lecture with a powerful message.  The answer to subversion is "bringing society back to religion.  Something that you cannot touch and eat and put on yourself.  But something that rules society and makes it move, and preserves it."

This all relates to a great lie about religion that has been carefully instilled in most:  that some individuals need religion.  They've got it backwards.  Societies NEED religion more than individuals do.  If there is not a single, unifying philosophy that all men are under together, then men (or perhaps the spirits they worship) will rule as they see fit.  If this is true, and I believe it is, how could the Creator (if he exists) prove his existence and mankind's purpose in a more effective way? History seems to prove we have a choice:  be ruled by the laws of God, or subject to the claws of Man.

Y.B. lecture of the process of ideological subversion Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN0By0xbst8

Y.B. slideshow presentation (audio only) Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCE2iexnOuc

Y.B. interview with G. Edward Griffin Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_xdBnFPqOI&feature=related

 ]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/yuri_bezmenov_-too_important_t.html http://www.henrymakow.com/yuri_bezmenov_-too_important_t.html Guest Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:05:25 +0000 What's With Jewish Comics & Girl's Genitals? larry-david-pic.jpg
by Henry Makow Ph.D.


Larry David has a rash. He tells the doctor he has been "seeing" a nine-year-old girl who has a "rash on her [genitals]."

"You know, we hugged..."

The doctor excuses himself and tells his receptionist to call the police.

The episode ends. I don't know what happens in the next episode.  

The child is the daughter of an employee. You can watch the whole thing here.

Is this what comedy has come to? Sixty-two-year old men talking about a little girl's genital rash?

A grown man who doesn't understand how this looks to the doctor? A mother who mentions the ailment to her boss? (Is she pimping her daughter?) Is this normal or healthy? Is it funny?

Because David is a comic genius, nobody has the cojones to tell him that pedophilia is not a laughing matter.  As you'll see in the clip, Jerry Seinfeld is speechless. 

A little girl's genitals are not up for discussion on TV. When it is, pedophilia is not far behind. 
 
I enjoy watching David's show, "Curb Your Enthusiasm." I like watching a self-centered, neurotic Jew satirize himself.   But part of my interest is the lapses in taste and judgment. It's like watching a train wreck.

BACKGROUND

When we last met Larry, he was insulting millions of Christians. He had a problem with his wiener and pissed all over a portrait of Jesus Christ, incongruously placed on the bathroom wall. His Christian employee interpreted the urine as tears and prayed before the "miracle."

Larry David was unapologetic. He's a Jew and some Jews have been pissing on Christ for a while. This is symbolic of a long-term attack on Christian culture and civilization, a "iconoclastic" need to challenge and destroy society and all civilized norms. This originates from the Sabbatean-Frankist Jewish heresy of the 17th & 18th centuries, a satanic movement which spawned the Illuminati, Communism, Hitler and the holocaust.

Sabbatean-Frankists indulged in every form of sexual deviance (incest, adultery, pedophilia) in order to manifest their contempt for God. Their descendants are behind the so-called "sexual liberation" movement. Most Jews don't realize how their people have been subverted by Satanists. This subversion has spread to many other religions, groups and to society as a whole.

THE NEW FUNNY

As you know, David and many other comedians have expanded their repertoire to pissing on any form of morality, decency or decorum. They equate being offensive and disgusting with being funny.

Judd Apatow,  another Jewish comic and writer, talks about his daughter's vagina in public. And then there's Woody Allen...What is their fascination? Is it incestuous? Do they suffer from some form of arrested development? 

They spread their depraved sensibility to their moronic audiences who seem to lap it up. Some people thought the video clip was "hysterical."

Only one person was outraged: "Morons! Are you enjoying it? The bastard speaks about a 9-year old in this kind of sexual terms? And gets away with it!! Why is this guy not in jail?" 

This is how some Illuminati Jews have been moving the goalposts for centuries in the name of "freedom.". This is how the Illuminati-controlled media establish new satanic norms. This is why anti-Semitism is endemic.

All Jews suffer from the actions of a comparative few. They need to speak up or be identified with the Illuminati Jews. Anti-Semitism is not an irrational sickness of gentiles. It's caused by Jews like Larry David.
----------

Anti Gentile Comedianne Sandra Bernhard    

]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/larry_david_-_trainwreck_in_sl.html http://www.henrymakow.com/larry_david_-_trainwreck_in_sl.html satanic Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:32:24 +0000  80% School Fights between Girls ]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/80_school_fights_between_girls.html http://www.henrymakow.com/80_school_fights_between_girls.html News Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:48:24 +0000 Memoir: Ballet and the Fake Fall of Communism Bolshoi1.jpgby Candice Schultz
(for henrymakow.com)


I would like to share my experiences of time spent in Russian-owned ballet studios over a period of years spanning the late eighties and nineties.

Every parent wants to encourage the passionate talent and interests of their children. When my youngest daughter was six, I enrolled her in a local suburban ballet school. Several weeks into the sessions, she would cry on the way home from class. I telephoned the ballet teacher. To my surprise she informed me that my daughter was very determined and talented and was frustrated so she suggested she move up to a class with nine-year-olds at a more appropriate level of  ability. Several years later she was auditioning for regional performances and by ten she was in a Russian ballet studio in the city. Here, she learned the Vaganova technique.

The Russian Ballet Master had been a member of the Kirov and the New York City Ballet. He took a personal interest in my daughter and we spent more and more time in the studios in the city, and we became close to the Russians, even traveling to other studios to give exhibitions to recruit new talent for the Company. My daughter delighted in the difficult yet beautiful roles she danced and the Bolshoi costumes that were brought over for her and the other dancers.

MEETING RUSSIANS

Both my husband and I spent long hours watching the dancers rehearse and take classes and  during that time we met a myriad of people. Accompanists who had previously been employed by the Bolshoi and the Kirov in the USSR. A very prominent Ukrainian woman would translate for me.  She explained that the one piano accompanist had her position due to membership in the Communist Party and that only Party members were able to get these good jobs in Russia. Superior ballerinas were passed over if they were not Party members.

One morning in 1989, I arrived early with my daughter and there was a group of Russian men in the office intently watching the news and laughing loudly. They were watching the 'coup" that was supposedly taking place in the Soviet Union. [i.e. the Communist uprising against Perestroika] When I asked what was so funny, the Russian Ballet Master told me that this was ,"Theater for the West". I looked puzzled so they explained that in Russia they have more mined gold than any country in the world but the problem was that there were no goods to buy. "The Russian Mafia and the KGB need an excuse to get out into the free world to spend this gold so they have come up with this plan."

As time went on, a flood of new students and professional ballet dancers came to the studios. Parents of some of the dancers told me that many Russians were moving to the city and that they had apartments, new cars but often no jobs. Most related that their children attended private Hebrew school as they considered the American public schools very inferior.

I asked if they were Jewish and some even laughed at me saying they would make the sign of the cross if it meant that they would be given the money by a Christian organization to come here, have an apartment and free private school.

The Ukrainians (Orthodox and Catholic ) would fume when they saw V do that mockingly. The Russian "Jews" who were not Jewish at all were the ones who said they would make the sign of the cross if they got free money, private school "Hebrew school" for free and were set up here in apartments. They came here funded by a big Jewish organization in DC (United Jewish Appeal?)...said they got thousands each to relocate here. I only knew one real Jewish family in the studios.....and they came here years earlier. Their son was exceptionally talented but his father insisted he pursue higher education too ....the father was an Engineer in Soviet Lithuainia and somehow they got out......but not the sceevy way the other fake "Jews" did using monies from DC after the "fall of Communism". These Communist atheists knew very well how to use our system. You have to wonder how many Jewish American families donated their money to help Jews escape Russia ..unknowingly bringing Communist atheists here. The newspapers said over 7000 families had relocated in the city from the former Soviet Union.

OBAMA

Now several months ago I read the story of Tom Fife, an American Engineer who participated in a collaborative effort with the Moscow Academy of Science shortly after the alleged fall of Communism in the early nineties. He relates the story of a dinner party prior to leaving Moscow wherein the Professor's wife, a dyed in the wool Party member bragged how " they" had selected a Black American who would be President. I also read many comments after his story from people who just did not believe he was now coming forward. Well I believe him and I will tell you why.

Because it is the experiences you hear and see in everyday life that stick in your mind especially when years later events prove them out. I have just read in 1991 to 1993, 200 tonnes of gold bullion disappeared from Russia and what happened to it is still not known.

Constance Combey featured Fife on her radio show.http://cumbey.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-information-on-barack-obama.html
She stated that he had given her the names of this Russian Professor and his wife and she found they had residences in both England and Moscow.

I could relate much more of our years with Soviet and former Soviet ballet dancers but suffice to say I am sure the Communist Party never dissolved nor did they leave their former ideologies. They just moved them here and to other parts of the world.

Lord Monckten said Greenpeace was taken over by the Communists (when they jumped over the wall" and that he knew the originator of Greenpeace and others who all left when the Communists took over.) One must ask oneself how was it that Gorbachev was so quickly given offices in the Presidio in SF for his Green Cross following the "sudden" fall of Communism. I wonder how many people read Putin's speeches printed in Pravda after 9/11? I did and was frightened to read how he gloated about the American economy headed for disaster. Why was the Reagan Administration so eager to partner with Russia in Science and Economics?

Who was it that Robert Hanssen stated he was 'loyal' to when he betrayed American secrets to the Soviets?
http://www.pacificnews.org/jinn/stories/6.31/010305-spy.html  and who funded the fake " fall of Communism" and why?

----
Fortunately, Master Classes opened my daughter's own eyes and on the last day of the trip home she told me she decided to quit ballet. When I asked why she said that she felt an evil from V she could not express and her skin crawled when he touched her......"besides, my career would force me to teach neurotic would- be dancers who were Professors of Dance like the one who fell on the floor crying and holding my legs saying she wanted my body."
----

About Anatoli Golytzin, "The Perestoika Deception" 


]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/ballet_-_memories_of_russian_j.html http://www.henrymakow.com/ballet_-_memories_of_russian_j.html Guest Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:32:25 +0000 Hitler Disses iPad (Video Humor)
]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/hitler_disses_ipad_video_humor.html http://www.henrymakow.com/hitler_disses_ipad_video_humor.html News Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:03:35 +0000 Hip Hop Promotes Satanic NWOI
]]> http://www.henrymakow.com/hip_hop_promotes_satanic_nwoi.html http://www.henrymakow.com/hip_hop_promotes_satanic_nwoi.html News Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:55:44 +0000