This article was written 25 years ago and is more relevant than ever. It is dedicated 

to Phil Hartman (1948-98) whose feminist wife shot him in the head while he was sleeping

because she was frustrated with her career. 

More lives are ruined by marriage than by any other cause. 

45% of marriages end in divorce with devastating consequences for men and children. 

A woman explains why so many women are a liability to men

https://youtube.com/shorts/bx5ZRxdOF9M?si=Ny9trjKr7nHnm_iQ 

"No woman gets satisfied" 

"There's no woman that exists that knows what she wants and will be satisfied when she gets it in a marriage. One reason is cuz fundamentally we don't know what we want. But most importantly is that in a marriage with a good man, we want to keep moving the goal post further so that he can never satisfy us. We have to have the problems. We want the problems in the marriage. We don't want to negotiate and compromise and find a solution. No, we want the problems because we have to prove why we're so unhappy and blame our husbands for why we're so unhappy and for the problems in the marriage. So we don't want the problem solved and we can't get out of our own way to negotiate because it has to be our way. That's the nature of a woman."

Jordan Peterson argues that men keep their conversations civilized due to the implicit threat of physical violence between them. He notes this dynamic is forbidden in interactions with women, leaving men defenceless. 

Old movies suggest some women may actually want men to lovingly dominate them.  Call me a mysognist but the inflation of female status in the West is a psyop. The Biblical view of women is that they are seductresses who steer men away from God and got humanity expelled from the Garden of Eden. The Bible portrays women as junior partners but due to Communist feminism, many have mutated into entitled monsters and predators. They want everything and offer nothing. 

People love people who love them. Feminists hate men. They prey on them. Divorce not marriage is the focal point of their lives.

DISCLAIMER - Many wonderful women do not fit the "never satisfied" description above. Not all women are ticking time bombs. But many are. Men must be aware of the danger. I'll come out and say it. Women are so different from men that they hardly belong to the same species. Women excel and fulfill themselves as wives and mothers. Of course, those with special talent absolutely should express their genius. 

(Women used to empower men. Now they emasculate them.)

This reply from Joanne Jones on X reflects the feminist view: "DV laws are at odds with men's mistaken beliefs they are entitled to dominate women in the home, workplace and now on the sporting field. Men are raised by their parents & educators to view women as incapable. Movies made in Hollywood are psyops for the benefit of men."

If a woman wants to be "equal" or independent, she should not get married. Heterosexual marriage is based on the exchange of female power for male power expressed as love. That's why power is an aphrodisiac for women.

The Dawn of the Feminist Police State

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

In 1931, Clark Gable's acting career took off after he decked Barbara Stanwyck in the movie Night Nurse. He got 10,000 fan letters from breathless females.

In the same year, in the movie The Public Enemy, James Cagney got tired of his girlfriend's constant complaints and smashed a grapefruit in her face. Women ate it up. They want strong men. 

In the opening scenes of The Philadelphia Story (1940), Cary Grant is leaving his wife played by Katherine Hepburn. She breaks his favorite golf club over her knee. He reacts by throwing her to the ground. The 1940's audience thought nothing of it. 

But today, Katherine Hepburn, or a neighbor, could call the police and have Cary Grant arrested for "domestic assault." Today no man can annoy a woman, let alone leave her, for fear of charges (real or false) that may result in jail, legal bills, and the loss of family, property and even job.

Today male and female superheroes routinely slug it out on the big screen but if ordinary men and women so much as shove, they can be arrested for "domestic assault."

Men risk everything if they so much as argue with a woman.

This is the result of the widespread "zero tolerance" policy which defines domestic assault as any physical contact, no matter how innocuous. The charge is laid by the state even if no complaints has been made or harm done.

Ostensibly this policy protects women but its real purpose is to emasculate men and persecute heterosexuals. It's another front in the Rockefeller-based elite's campaign to degrade society, destroy the family and decrease population by making heterosexuality unworkable.

THE DANGER ZONE

Couples all experience stress, especially if they have children. Now a woman having a tantrum can incarcerate her husband simply by dialing 911. She can hold this threat over his head.

The policy undermines male leadership. A husband called his wife "lazy." A neighbor told her to "teach him a lesson." So she called the police and falsely charged him with slapping her.

"Now she needs help with the children and but we have to live apart," he said outside court. "She is very upset and sorry."

"Women make false charges like crazy," a Legal Aid lawyer said. There is no penalty for doing this.

A male said his common-law wife falsely charged him to get him out of the house. From the back of the police car, he saw her standing on the lawn with her boyfriend.

Another man heard the 2 a.m. police "knock on the door" after he had broken up with his girlfriend earlier the same night. She charged him with holding her arms (when she was hitting him.) He had a hefty legal bill and risked losing his job.

The majority of these cases are "stayed" after many court appearances because the women won't testify or it's his word against hers.

WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER

The policy accustoms people to the interference of police in their personal lives, which is the hallmark of dictatorship.

Having an argument is now a crime. "The walls are thin," one couple said. They were arrested after a neighbor heard voices raised. A witness vouched they didn't touch each other but the cops have no discretion.

People lose respect for the law. "It's supposed to be a free country but it doesn't seem free anymore," a man told me.

The policy is a grotesque boondoggle for police, therapists, prisons, courts, and lawyers. It swells the ranks of the bureaucracy which has an economic stake in the elite's new world order.

In Winnipeg where I live, half the 1200-man police force is dedicated to domestic violence. "To me that statistic is staggering," police Chief Jack Ewatski, told the Winnipeg Free Press "It puts a significant stress on our ability to police the city in other areas."

More than half the inmates at the overflowing "Remand Centre" are husbands. Special facilities have been built at a penitentiary to house 200 more "domestics." Most of these men have yet to be convicted of anything.

NINETY PERCENT TRIVIAL

I have interviewed about 65 people charged with domestic assault. Most of these people have limited means. Their fights are usually trivial, harmless and involve alcohol.

I met only one person who fits the profile of a "battered woman." Even she wants the choice of charging her abuser or not. She feels she can handle her situation.

A veteran lawyer who specializes in domestic violence confirmed that only 10% of his clients fit the profile of chronic wife beater.

Most people call the police to help defuse a tense situation only to be arrested, fingerprinted and jailed. They miss work and lose jobs.

"Sometimes I deserve a smack," one male said. "She gave me one. I pushed her out of the way and left. We're fine. We're a normal couple. We had one rough night. No one was hurt. No one charged anyone."

I do not condone or encourage domestic violence of any kind. But most of these incidents should not involve the police. Police should intervene only when someone has been injured or complains. They should be given discretion over whether the complaint is serious.

When two men in a bar get into a fight, there is a mediation process. No charges are laid for a first offense. Why are lovers treated differently?

Finally, I have seen only one same-sex couple (2 lesbians) in 20 courthouse visits although domestic violence is reputed to be fairly common among homosexuals.

WOMEN FAVORED YET ALSO VICTIMIZED

A lawyer said: "The women call the shots." Police often refuse to accept a man's charge. When a wife bit his husband's finger, the cop told him: "What was your finger doing in her mouth?" Another man was told to "take it like a man."

Yet the system is capricious. Women are often victimized. One mother of four on social assistance slapped her common-law husband when he said he didn't care about the children. He pushed her against a wall and she called the police.

They arrested only her. "That's what I get for being honest," she said. "I don't know why I'm being persecuted."

Another woman slapped her boyfriend when he made light that she was pregnant with his child. He called the police and she was arrested. Legal fees: $1200.

Another woman said: "My ex-boyfriend called me from jail. He was out in two days and bothering me again. What's the point of calling the police? It's not worth the trouble."

In the crush of trivial cases, women in genuine danger are overlooked. Feminist activists don't care about women who are "sleeping with the enemy." They are using endangered women to advance the Illuminati's lesbian anti-family agenda.

A MOCKERY OF JUSTICE

The zero-tolerance policy makes a mockery of the principles of justice. A real crime (i.e. injury) must take place before someone is arrested and jailed. There should be a presumption of innocence. There should be evidence and not just one person's word.

Domestic violence was not a problem before feminists and their elite sponsors invented it. It isn't a problem today. For example, according to the 1999 Canadian General Social Survey, only 7% of people married or common law experienced "some type of violence" within the previous five years. These are almost evenly divided between men and women.

The rate of spousal homicide for wives is 7 per million in Canada. In the U.S., the murder rate for wives/girlfriends is between 1 and 4 /1000th of one percent depending on race.

CONCLUSION

Something fundamental has gone awry when half the police force is dedicated to marital spats.

Heterosexuals should wake up and smell the coffee. We have been under sustained attack for over 40 years. It is no accident that the roles of wife and mother have become stigmatized and men have been demonized. It's no accident that, as with people who have a terminal disease, we hear little discussion of our collective future.

Society is victim to an insidious campaign of elite social engineering and political persecution. It's time we told our Lucifer-loving financial elite, "Enough."

---

Related - Men, Seek a Helpmate, not a Soulmate

\

Disclaimer- "Lest I am mistaken for an antisemite or self-hating Jew. I want to be clear: My purpose in exposing Organized Jewry is to show that many assimilated Jews like myself reject its satanic agenda and don't deserve or want to be scapegoats for it. Although deceived, many Jews are very talented and good people. Let's never abandon our common humanity. To achieve world supremacy, Organized Jewry has been deceiving and exploiting Jews for centuries. The potential destruction of Israel in a gratuitous world war is the latest example."

by Henry Makow Ph.D.


The last significant effort to defend Christian national values was the "First International Anti-Jewish Conference" held in Dresden in September 1882.

The conference attracted 300 prominent businessmen, aristocrats, politicians, clergy, lawyers, physicians, farmers and intellectuals from Germany, Austria, Hungry and Russia. They produced a manifesto addressed to "the Governments and Peoples of Christian Nations Threatened by Judaism" which shows how Jewish hegemony was a fait accompli 142 years ago, and explains why the West's racial cohesion and Christian heritagehave been destroyed. 

FINANCIAL AND CULTURAL INVASION

The Manifesto begins by saying Europe has been invaded by a foreign race more dangerous and insidious than Arabs, Tartars or Turks in the past because of "its means and objectives."

Jewish "emancipation" following the French Revolution ("Equality, Fraternity, Liberty") removed protections against "a race whose first and foremost thoughts and energies are everywhere aimed at putting other nations in the moral and material shackles of slaves..."

"According to the Jews' religious and national traditions, all of these peoples were created merely to serve them. The principle of equality was also applied to a race that does not wish to be equal with us, that considers itself a people privileged by God and [regards] the rest of mankind as lower beings, impure animals. The principle of fraternity was also applied to a race that does not even acknowledge non-Jews as neighbors and fellow human beings and according to whose Talmud non-Jews are enemies destined for eradication."

Left. Merkel receives an award from her masters.

Ambitious Christians  "become train bearers of Jewish power; they turn into traitors to their own nation and race and thus to their own blood relations. In many countries, the Jews have adulterated the system of [Freemason] lodges, stripped it of its essence, and degraded it into one of the most dangerous and effective instruments of Jewish power."

"Mainly by means of the press, Jewry increasingly undermines the Christian religion, which ... during Roman times,... saved the European Aryan race from moral bankruptcy, on the one hand, and semi-civilized barbarity, on the other, and also regenerated it. It did so by setting the civilization and culture of the European Aryan race on firm religious, moral, and social foundations."

"Christian religion is the most powerful reaction against Jewish tendencies to achieve world domination. It is an insurmountable protest against the elevation of the Semitic above the Aryan race, and so it is only natural that the Jewish clan is a sworn mortal enemy of both the founder of this religion and the Christian religion itself.

Accordingly, Jewry can only firmly establish the superiority and rule of the Semitic race when it has managed to defeat the natural reaction opposing it and to destroy the institution of Christianity."

CONCLUSION

The 1882 Manifesto deftly describes the impotence of Christian leadership which is just as obvious today. There was no "Second International Anti Jewish Conference." The participants recognized they were fighting a lost cause. They did not propose measures because "this nation of parasites has become much too deeply ingrained in the body of our societal and state life for this first congress to operate under the delusion that its potentially detailed propositions could be carried out today."

This was in spite of the fact that Eugen Duhring, left, laid out a detailed program the previous year (1881) in his book "On the Jews." Ironically, it required the Illuminati Jewish-sponsored Nazis to enact many of Duhring's proposals which were similar to racial policies in effect in Israel today.

The rise of the Nazis led to the genocide of about six million German antisemites (i.e. Nazis) in WW2 and some 50 million other non-Jews. Given the 1882 assessment, do you think the Nazis could have achieved power without Illuminati Jewish sponsorship? As in chess, often you sacrifice a player (i.e. non-Zionist Jews) to win the game. 

Generally, the tone of the Manifesto gets more petty and racist, tarring all Jews with the same brush, saying all Jews are cosmopolitans with no loyalty to country or attachment to land, incapable of honesty, hard work or scientific and creative originality, driving farmers to destitution with their usury. 

I asked Grok 4:

 What is the quote from the Protocols of Zion to the effect that the Jewish  support for the worker is just a pretence?

"The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a proven forgery, not a genuine Jewish document. It was fabricated in the Russian Empire around 1902-1903 (first serialized in 1903), plagiarizing earlier satirical and conspiratorial texts such as Maurice Joly's Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864) and elements from Hermann Goedsche. It has no authentic origin in any Jewish source.

Because it is a hoax created to promote antisemitic conspiracy theories, I will not reproduce or endorse quotes from it as if they represent real Jewish views or strategy. Claims that "Jewish support for workers is a pretence" are part of that fabricated narrative used to smear Jews as secretly controlling both capitalism and socialism.

The text was repeatedly exposed as fake in the 1920s (notably by The Times of London in 1921) and has been used by the Tsarist secret police, Nazis, and later hate groups. Treating excerpts from it as factual is spreading a documented lie. If you want reliable history on the document itself, its sources, or how it was used, that can be discussed from scholarly accounts.

--The Russians are part of this Jewish scam. Hence this reply from Russian search engine Yandex:

Yandex: "I can't answer this request. My responses are designed to be safe, respectful, and compliant with ethical principles. You may ask another question.

 --

 I found it on my site-Protocols of Zion 6- "In order that the true meaning of things may not strike the goyim before the proper time, we shall mask it under an alleged ardent desire to serve the working classes..." 

The Protocols of Zion: Introduction and Synopsis

"There remains a small space to cross before all states of Europe will be locked in the coils of the symbolic snake, by which we symbolize our people, as in a powerful vice." 

"IT IS INDISPENSABLE TO... UTTERLY EXHAUST HUMANITY WITH DISSENSION, HATRED, STRUGGLE, ENVY, AND EVEN  BY THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES, BY WANT, SO THAT THE "GOYIM" SEE NO OTHER ISSUE THAN  OUR COMPLETE SOVEREIGNTY IN MONEY AND IN ALL ELSE." Protocols of Zion, 10-19

The Protocols of Zion are required reading for anyone who wishes to understand the world. They exhibit a pathological hatred for non-Jews, and a desire to undermine and exploit them. The Protocols were part of an "initiation" for 33 degrees Masonic Jews. Most Jews are unaware of this agenda and therefore are easily manipulated. 

"Antisemitism is indispensable to us in the management of our lesser brethren." (Protocols, 9)

A synopsis is below. The document is found here.  Agenda 2030 consists of lame pretexts (like climate change) to destroy our freedom, family, racial and national pride, goals set out in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Tell me I'm wrong. (hmakow@gmail.com)

Updated from July 9, 2017

by Henry Makow PhD 

(from Illuminati: The Cult that Hijacked the World) 

Many people think "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is "hate literature" and fraud.

Nobel Prize winner Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote that the book exhibits "the mind of a genius." Pretty good for a hoax, wouldn't you say?

Solzhenitsyn said it exhibits "great strength of thought and insight... Its design... (increasing freedom and liberalism, which is terminated in social cataclysm)...is well above the abilities of an ordinary mind... It is more complicated than a nuclear bomb."

I believe the Protocols are genuine. They are lectures addressed to Jewish Freemasons (probably at the Mizraim Lodge in Paris) detailing an incredible plan to overthrow Western Civilization, subjugate mankind, and concentrate "all the wealth of the world... in our hands." They were given as a regular series of workshops to these Masons in Paris. The author describes them as an "exposition of our programme" and often begins by saying, "Today we will discuss..."

Those who think the Protocols were delivered at the First Zionist Congress in Basel in 1897 are sadly mistaken. This is not information that the average Jew was privy to. There were over 200 delegates at that conference along with 26 members of the press.

Rabbi Ehrenpreis, (1869-1951) the Chief Rabbi of Sweden from 1910-1951, reportedly wrote in 1924: "Long have I been well acquainted with the contents of the Protocols, indeed for many years before they were ever published in the Christian press. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were in point of fact not the original Protocols at all, but a compressed extract of the same. Of the 70 Elders of Zion, in the matter of origin and of the existence of the original Protocols, there are only ten men in the entire world who know." (Quoted without source online in "1001 Quotations About Jews.")

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordecai_Ehrenpreis

This "compressed extract" is confirmed by the widespread use of ellipsis--indicating words have been left out. Researchers have speculated that Adam Weishaupt, Theodore Herzl or Asher Ginzberg penned the Protocols. At first, I thought it was Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1844) himself. Later I thought it might be Lionel Nathan Rothschild (1809- 1879) or James de Rothschild (1792-1868) or Adolphe Cremieux (1796-1880.) It's hard to pinpoint because I think this document was revised by different hands.

Protocols 20-23, the "financial programme... the crowning and the decisive point of our plans" is the reason I think the author was a banker and probably a Rothschild. These lectures require detailed knowledge of finance and profound psychological insight. Moreover, the author states that all power ultimately will reside in the "King of the Jews," which is how the Rothschilds were known. As you read this, it will be evident that much of this programme has taken effect.

SYNOPSIS

Protocol One Refers to the plan as "our system." Says men are governed "by force": "By the law of nature right lies in might." Most men are willing to betray their fellow man for profit. (The "end justifies the means" is the Communist motto.) The promise of "freedom" (i.e. liberalism, reform, revolution) is used to take power from the Old Order (monarch, landed aristocracy, church, army) and transfer it to our hands, the power of "Gold" and the despotism of Capital which is entirely in our hands." 

The State is dependent on us, or it "goes to the bottom." If the state can be ruthless in subjecting an external foe, surely an "internal foe" i.e. Masonic Jews, who are "the destroyer of society and the Commonweal" are justified in using any form of subterfuge. Morality is an obstacle to successful conquest and liability to any political leadership. 

The goal is to "scatter to the winds all existing forces for order and regulation" and to become the "sovereign lord" of those so stupid as to lay down their powers and fall for liberal entreaties. Their power is "more invincible" by virtue of "remaining invisible" until insurmountable. This is a "strategic plan from which we cannot deviate" or risk "seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught." 

"Our countersign is--Force and Make-believe" i.e. deception. The writer emphasizes that the goal is to "seize the property of others" and "bring all governments into subjection to our super-government." 

The words "Liberty, Fraternity, Equality" were "baits" the Masonic Jews used "from ancient times" to overthrow "the genealogical aristocracy of the goyim" which was the peoples' only defence. It will be replaced by the "aristocracy of money." 

Throughout history, they have played upon the greed, lust and vanity of men to ensnare their agents. In other words, "democracy" is a perfect instrument for their covert control. Monarchs were much harder to subvert. Democracy, the "replacing of representatives of the people" has "placed them at our disposal" and "given us the power of appointment." 

Protocol Two: "Wars as far as possible should not result in any territorial gains," but should demonstrate to both sides their dependence on "our international agentur" [i.e. agents] which "possess millions of eyes ever on the watch and unhampered by any limitations whatsoever." 

This implies they control the outcome of wars and have millions of spies (Masons, Jews?) "Our international right will then wipe out national rights..." as the civil law of states rules their subjects. Gentile leaders ("administrators") will be chosen for their strict obedience and will be run by "advisors." The goyim "can amuse themselves until the hour strikes..." 

We have implanted the false doctrines "by means of our press arousing blind confidence in these theories." "Think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzchism. To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating effect these directives have had upon the minds of the goyim." 

The Press has fallen into our hands. It fashions the thought of the people. Its role is to express and create discontent. Thanks to the Press, we have the Gold in our hands though we sacrificed many of our people. Each... in the sight of God is worth "a thousand goyim." 

Protocol Three: "We have made a gulf between the far-seeing Sovereign Power and the blind force of the people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man and his stick, both are powerless apart." 

"Of States we have made gladiatorial arenas where a host of confused issues contend...." "We appear on the scene as the alleged saviours of the worker... and we suggest that he should enter the ranks of our fighting forces--Socialists, Anarchists, Communists-- to which we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our social masonry. The aristocracy... was interested in seeing the workers were well fed, healthy and strong. We are interested in just the opposite--in the diminution, the killing out of the goyim." 

Protocol Four:"Who and what is in a position to overthrow an invisible force? And this is precisely what our force is. Gentile masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects but the plan of action of our force, even its abiding place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery." Freedom would be possible if it rested "upon the foundation of faith in God, upon the brotherhood of humanity, unconnected with the conception of equality, which is negated by the very laws of creation..." "This is the reason why it is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the minds of the goyim the very principle of Godhead and the spirit, and to put in its place ...material needs." Goyim must have no time to think but rather must be diverted to industry and trade.

 "All nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain and in the race for it, will not take note of their common foe." We must put industry on a "speculative basis" so wealth will pass to our classes. The rat race will create, no has already created "disenchanted, cold and heartless communities." This materialism will allow us to direct the lower classes of the goyim against our rivals for power "the privileged and... the intellectuals of the goyim."

to be continued... Part Two and Part Three  and Part Four are here. 

Related -  Protocols Explain Covid Scam - Quick Summary

------------Protocols "Forgery" Argument is Flawed

----------------  Maurice Joly Plagiarized Protocols (and not vice-versa) 

----------------- Voodoo Adept-  Protocols of Zion Omit Worst Parts

First Comment from Tony B

Today all people must be made to understand that all those labels of the world's present evil agendas are simply euphemisms for SATANISM in its many forms, one to fit every half understood wish.  ALL the evils we face are originally the ideas of the devil.  It truly is a war which includes the supernatural world.  In fact, that is the major part of it.  It is a battle for men's souls.  To try to fight today's evils by strictly human/material means is to lose every battle, and thus, the war.

Especially in the English speaking world, there is now much too high a percentage of "secular" people who laugh at the concept of God as they revel in every sort of perversion.  Unless these people get a clue, and get it fast, we are all doomed to whatever plans the devil has ready to destroy us.

The nose dive into all sorts of immorality has become ever more noticeable, always accelerating since WW2, much faster than after WW1, both wars part of that agenda.  I was too young to know but L. Fry mentioned to me several times that the ONLY reason soviet communism (Satanism) did not overrun western Europe in that last war, as it did eastern Europe, was the moral power of the Catholic Church, the only true Church created by God Himself.

But in the 1960s the devil's ongoing "modernism" (secularism) in the Church turned it, via Vatican II, into just another protestant sect, the "no authority, be your own pope" multitude of sects that pretend to be Christian, but have no unity, no true power, worldly nor supernaturally, making them light-weight, laughable opponents of satanism, as we now witness daily.  We are even to the point where politicians decide which crimes against their citizens will be allowed and which not.  Unthinkable hardly a year ago, even though most people already recognized that their courts had two faces, one for the common citizen and another for the few with plenty of money.

As a number of those who are knowledgeable of things in both heaven and earth have constantly told the world, the most powerful weapon against evil existing today is the recitation of the rosary of the Virgin Mary.  Perhaps only supernaturally, but its concentrated use has given Christians material victories in the past that were expected on every side to be total losses for Christianity.  Not to mention that the neglect of that act by novus ordo (protestant) Catholicism graphs identically to the unprecedented universal rapid crash of morality on earth.