<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>henrymakow.com</title>
      <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:15:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.1</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Illuminati Murdered at least Two Other Presidents (Encore)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="harrison.jpg" src="http://www.savethemales.ca/harrison.jpg" height="190" width="316" />&nbsp;<br />
<strong>By Henry Makow Ph.D.</strong> <br />

<br />
<em></em></p><p><em>(Originally posted a year ago.)<br /></em></p><p><em>"The bane of our civil institutions is to be found in Masonry, already powerful and daily becoming more so. I owe to my country an exposure of its dangers." - Captain William Morgan, murdered Sept 11, 1826</em> <br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>A curious but very credible</strong> Internet document called "The Mardi Gras Secrets" states that Illuminati agents poisoned and killed Presidents William Henry Harrison (1773-1841) and Zachary Taylor (1784-1850). They also poisoned James Buchanan in 1857 but he survived. All three were obstructing Illuminati- House of Rothschild plans for the US Civil War (1860-1865). <br />
<br />
The document also describes the Illuminati role in the murders of Abraham Lincoln and Senator Huey Long. We know they also killed Presidents Garfield, McKinley and Kennedy and probably Warren Harding and possibly FDR. If George W. Bush weren't doing such an awful job, he probably would be poisoned as well. <br />

<br />
The Mardi Gras Secrets <a href="http://www.mardigrassecrets.com/index.html">website&nbsp;&nbsp;</a> was created in Dec. 2005 by Mimi L. Eustis, the daughter of Samuel Todd Churchill, a high level member of the secret New Orleans Mardi Gras Society called "The Mystick Crewe of Comus." <br />
<br />
This Society, which reorganized the Mardi Gras festivities in 1857, was a chapter of the Skull and Bones. It began as a front for the activities of Masons Albert Pike, Judah Benjamin and John Slidell who became leaders of the Confederacy. <br />
<br />
This information is based on Samuel Churchill's deathbed confessions, when he was dying of lung cancer. Mrs. Eustis later decided to make them public after she also contracted the terminal disease. </p>
<p>The Illuminati ringleader was Caleb Cushing (1800-1879), the partner of William Russell, the opium smuggler who founded the Yale Skull and Bones Society in 1832. In order to rise in this society, one had to participate in a "killing of the king" rite of passage. <br />

<br />
According to Eustis, the Skull and Bones (or Brotherhood of Death) is "nothing more than a political assassination hit team against those United States politicians who do not fall in line with the House of Rothschild's plans for a blood elitist domination and control over the world's economy...For example Caleb Cushing was involved in the arsenic <br />
poisoning deaths of United States presidents William Henry Harrison on April 4, 1841 and Zachary Taylor on July 9, 1850. These two Presidents had opposed admitting Texas and California as slave states." <br />
<br />
William Henry Harrison was the first President ever to die in office, serving only 31 days. According to Wikipedia he died of "pneumonia." <br />
<br />
On July 3, 1850, Zachary Taylor threatened to hang those ``taken in rebellion against the Union.'' The next day the President fell ill, vomited blackish material, and died July 9. (Kentucky authorities recently dug up Taylor's body looking for evidence of arsenic poisoning.) <br />
<br />
<br />

<strong>THE ASSASSINATION OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN</strong> <br />
<br />
I paraphrase Mrs. Eustis: During the Civil War (from 1861-1865), President Lincoln needed money to finance the War . The loan shark-bankers wanted 24% to 36% interest. Instead, Lincoln got Congress to authorize the printing of 450 million dollars worth of "Greenbacks" debt and interest-free money. It served as legal tender for all debts, <br />
public and private. <br />
<br />
The House of Rothschild recognized that sovereign governments printing interest-free and debt-free paper money would break their power. <br />
<br />
Lincoln's assassin, John Wilkes Booth, was a member of Pike's Knights of <br />

the Golden Circle. He was in New Orleans during the winter of 1863-64 <br />
and conspired with Pike, Benjamin, Slidell and Admiral G.W. Baird to assassinate Lincoln. Baird later identified the body of Captain James William Boyd as Booth's. (Boyd was in fact a Confederate spy who resembled Booth and was used as a patsy. His body was dumped into an Arsenal Prison sinkhole used to dump dead horses.) <br />
<br />
Eustis says her father emphasized that most Masons below the 3rd degree were good hardworking people. The Illuminati-Skull and Bones used the Masons as a disguise. Those who rose past the 33 degree level did so by participating in the "Killing of the King" ritual. The lower levels did as they were told without realizing their part in the "Killing of the King". <br />
<br />
For assassinating Abraham Lincoln, Pike, Benjamin, Slidell and August Belmont (Rothschild's Northern agent) were made secret Kings of the Mystick Krewe of Comus. Andrew Johnson Vice -President became President and pardoned Albert Pike. Albert Pike awarded Andrew Johnson the thirty-third degree rite of passage. <br />
<br />
" Doctors were an essential part of the Illuminati plan to kill U.S. political leaders [who] hindered the take over of the U.S. Republic by the international banking elite," Eustis writes. <br />

<br />
" Illuminati doctors eventually did in both U.S. President William Henry Harrison and Zachary Taylor. They also played a death role in the shooting assassinations of U.S. Presidents Abraham Lincoln on April 14, 1865 (died April 15, 1865), James Garfield on July 2, 1881 (died September 19, 1881), and William McKinley Jr. on September 6, 1901 (died September 14, 1901)." <br />
<br />
"Teddy Roosevelt became President after William McKinley was shot. Roosevelt received passage into the 33rd. degree and became a secret king of the Mystick Krewe of Comus. During his presidency, the Skull and Bones became firmly entrenched and controlled the U.S. Republic." <br />
<br />
<strong>HUEY LONG <br />
</strong><br />
Huey Long ("Kingfish") was a populist who mounted a powerful challenge to FDR from his power base as Governor of Louisiana and later as US <br />

Senator. Unlike FDR, he was not a Mason and not a shill for the bankers. <br />
His "Share Our Wealth" program represented a genuine threat to the Illuminati. <br />
<br />
An Illuminati member, Dr. Carl Austin Weiss shot Long Sept 8, 1935 and Dr. Arthur Vidrine ensured that Long did not recover. According to Eustis, Weiss was supposed to hit Long in the face, and Long's bodyguard Murphy Roden was supposed to shoot both Weiss and Long.This may indeed be what happened. <br />
<br />
Roden was a "spy for J. Edgar Hoover." Roden pumped 60 bullets into Weiss'body. Dr. Weiss was told his baby would be killed if he reneged on the mission. <br />
<br />

Both FDR and J. Edgar Hoover won their 33 degree rite of passage for their participation in this murder. <br />
<br />
"Franklin Delano Roosevelt was made King of Comus in 1937. When J. Edgar Hoover came down to New Orleans to act out his reign as King of Comus, he was involved in a sexual revelry of homosexuality and cross-dressing with various elitist bloodline members of the Mystick Krewe of Comus." <br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>LINDBERG AND HARDING</strong> <br />
<br />
"Agents of Skull and Bones with blessing and involvement of J. Edgar Hoover FBI Director and 33rd level executioner-cover up specialist for the elitist bloodline of the House of Rothschild murdered Freemason Charles Lindberg's son. This killing of Freemason Charles Lindberg's son was to set an example that the isolationist stand was not the will of the Illuminati." <br />

<br />
Mrs. Eustis doesn't touch upon the poisoning death of President Warren Harding (1865-1923) but this is how Wikipedia describes it: <br />
<br />
"At the end of July, while traveling south from Alaska through British Columbia, [Harding] developed what was thought to be a severe case of&nbsp; <strong>food poisoning.</strong> At the Palace Hotel in San Francisco, he developed <strong>pneumonia</strong>. Harding died of either a<strong> heart attack</strong> or a <strong>stroke</strong> at 7:35 p.m. on August 2, 1923, at the age of 57. The formal announcement, <br />

printed in the New York Times of that day, stated that <strong>'a stroke of apoplexy'</strong> was the cause of death.' He had been ill exactly one week." <br />
<br />
For FDR, see Emanuel Josephson, <em>"The Strange Death of Franklin D. <br />
Roosevelt."</em> (1948) <br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>CONCLUSION <br />

</strong><br />
The "Mardi Gras Secrets" suggest that, given the depth of corruption, the US political system cannot be taken seriously as a democracy. There is a pattern of Illuminati-Rothschild control throughout US history. People who deny this are living in a fantasy. <br />
<br />
The United States was created to advance the Illuminati New World Order based on Rothschild control of credit. American ideals were designed to dupe the masses, not to be realized. <br />
<br />
The founders and heroes of the US were mostly Masons including Paul Revere, John Paul Jones and Benjamin Franklin. Francis Scott Key who wrote the national anthem was a Mason. John Hancock and most of the signatories of the Declaration of Independence were also Masons. <br />
<br />
More-than-half the Presidents were Masons. These include Washington, Madison, Adams, Jefferson, Monroe, Jackson, Van Buren, Tyler, Polk, Taylor, Pierce, Buchanan, Johnson, Garfield, McKinley, TR, Taft, Harding, FDR, Truman, LBJ, Ford, Reagan, Clinton and Bush I and II. <br />
<br />
Some of these really thought Masonry was about "making good men better" and had to be assassinated. Other Presidents who weren't Masons, like Eisenhower, Nixon and Carter, were still controlled by the same dark forces. <br />

<br />
Throughout its history the United States has been in the clutches of a satanic cult empowered by the Rothschild central banking cartel. Many courageous Presidents and other politicians tried to free their countrymen and died unrecognized, their killers unpunished and triumphant. <br />
<br />
The US is a nation decapitated, a headless giant led by demons. <br />
--------</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/uspresidentasmasons_1b.htm">A&nbsp;survey of Masonic Influence in US History.</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlEqtaWpKEU">JFK on Secret Societies</a> (You Tube)</p>
<p><a href="http://web.mountain.net/morton/others/lincoln1.htm%3E">Same Story with a Jesuit Spin</a></p>

<p>&nbsp;Scroll down for background from a reader on the Skull and Bones, Pirates and New Orleans.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/002009.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/002009.html</guid>
         <category>SATANIC INFLUENCE</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br /><a href="http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Wicca%20&amp;%20Witchcraft/signs_of_satan.htm">Signers of Satan</a><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/signers_of_satan.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/signers_of_satan.html</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br /><br />Gays <a href="http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23687597-5000117,00.html">Don't Want </a>Marriage<br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/gays_dont_want_marriage.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/gays_dont_want_marriage.html</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="bachelorette.jpg" src="http://www.henrymakow.com/bachelorette.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="227" width="145" /></span> <div><br /><br /><i>In love with herself. Yes. But attractive to men...I think not.</i><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />"<b>Now, it's not that I don't engage in compromise, </b>but I stick to a particular methodology and without apology. I like sleeping alone in my lovely queen-sized bed. When I'm drinking beer on my couch and watching football, it's a pain to have to do my hair and makeup for a boyfriend. I enjoy my loud, laughter-filled, sometimes vulgar, five-hour telephone conversations with girlfriends. And although I'm not obsessed with cleanliness, I like dishes taken to the kitchen sink and pre-rinsed. Conversely, I don't like being criticized for having a messy kitchen. Just some insight into what I find endearing about bachelorettehood."<br /><br /><br />For the whole pathetic rationalization for being unlovable and alone..<a href="http://lifestyle.sympatico.msn.ca/A+Peek+Into+the+Life+of+a+Bachelorette/Living/NEWContentPosting_TheSoko.aspx?isfa=1&amp;newsitemid=thesoko-1896&amp;feedname=THESOKO_V2&amp;show=False&amp;number=3&amp;showbyline=True&amp;subtitle=&amp;detect=&amp;abc=abc&amp;date=False"> see this link</a><br /><br /><br /></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/_in_love_with_herself.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/_in_love_with_herself.html</guid>
         <category>Letters</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 01:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br /><a href="http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/">Norman Finkelstein</a><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/norman_finkelstein.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/norman_finkelstein.html</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 01:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Kevin Annett Rips the Mask from Power</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="annett2.jpg" src="http://www.henrymakow.com/annett2.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="193" width="168" /></span><b>by Henry Makow Ph.D.</b><br /><br /><br /><b>If Christ returned,</b> he'd be crucified again, not by Jews or Romans but by the church, which has been invaded by His enemies. <br /><br />This is obvious from the fate of Kevin Annett, a young United Church of Canada minister who took Christ's teachings to heart, and suffered everything but Crucifixion. (To date, Christ's enemies are reluctant to create another martyr.)<br /><br />I have been studying the New World Order for eight years but no book has laid bare the true hypocritical face of&nbsp; power in Western society as Kevin Annett's self published memoirs, <i>"Love and Death in the Valley." </i>Many books have left me winded, but none like this. <br /><br />I have met Kevin Annett and he doesn't have a halo. But he does exude a transparency and a dogged determination to make sure we learn the truth about the genocide of (he claims) "roughly" 80-90 million North American Indians. He is the closest thing to a genuine dissident in this society, the closest thing to a real hero.&nbsp; Although he's been fighting this lonely battle for 15 years,&nbsp; we haven't heard of him, proof our "heroes" are manufactured for us.<br /><br />Kevin is the kind of "innocent" or "true believer"&nbsp; organizations like the Communist Party or United (Methodist-Presbyterian) Church hire to provide an artifice.&nbsp; But "every group has rules"&nbsp; as Kevin was told repeatedly, and Kevin didn't adapt.&nbsp; A real Christian represents Christ --not the corrupt impostors who profit from his teaching. Kevin was a Minister of Christ. <br /><br /><b>WHAT PAINT CAN'T HIDE</b><br /><br />"Give the place a bit of Spirit," his boss at Fred Victor Mission, a
residence for the homeless near Toronto's seedy district
told him, as if talking to a painter.<br /><br />In the course of his work, Kevin learned the Church Mission was a center for drug trafficking and prostitution and the staff were on the take. He learned that large donations to the Mission were embezzled, while there wasn't any money for Bibles.&nbsp; When he took these matters to the top of the church hierarchy, they knew and didn't want to know. <br /><br />This was his first glimpse of the United Church of Canada as a four billion dollar corporation that provides a nice tax-exempt front for a lot of rich people&nbsp; and a lot of shady dealings. But that's just scratching the surface of&nbsp; a potential nightmare for the 2.8 million bland well meaning Canadians affiliated with this empty shell of a church.<br /><br />When Kevin (what an exquisitely Canadian name) took up his next position as Minister in a British Columbia logging town, he opened his sanctuary to the poor and the non-White. He began to hear stories from his Aboriginal parishioners about ethnic cleansing at government funded church-run "residential schools."<br /><br />Native children&nbsp; were abducted by the RCMP and forced to attend these "schools" which were concentration camps in disguise. Here helpless children were physically and sexually abused, sterilized and exposed to deadly viruses. Many were subjected to medical experimentation from Illuminati doctors. The death rate was 50%&nbsp; Annett estimates over 50,000 children died at these schools. &nbsp;<br /><br />In an email Tuesday, he wrote: "Continually, eyewitnesses describe that most of them never received formal education, besides religious instruction. Maybe one or two hours of schooling a week, the rest of the time working as manual labour and farmed out as cheap labour or domestics to white families. The ones who got a better education were the collaborators, being trained to be puppets of the government and churches - they're often the ones who now run the big aboriginal groups, band councils, etc. I also have letters from Indian Agents confirming that the kids were not to receive "too much" education."<br /><br />The blurring of class and color lines strained relations with the church "Old Guard" but the deal breaker was when Kevin publicly opposed the lucrative sale of Aboriginal lands the church held in trust to a large logging company. <br /><br />Kevin was stripped of his Ministry, the only United Church Minister ever to be defrocked. His supporters were expelled from the church and his wife was pressured to divorce him and take their two children.<br /><br /><b>ACADEMIA</b><br /><br />Next stop on Kevin's voyage of discovery was a Ph.D. program at the University of British Columbia. There he had access to government archives which documented a deliberate agenda of ethnic cleansing which (he says) claimed one to two million Aboriginals in British Columbia alone over a century. <br /><br />Just as the Church represents Christ, the university is dedicated to free inquiry and truth. Thus Kevin's funding disappeared and he had to leave. "Unless you play the game, you'll never work in this province again," he was told.<br /><br />Is it any wonder society is drifting toward Fascism when the institutions that are dedicated to&nbsp; truth and moral leadership are rotten to the core? You can smell the stench of moral compromise, like rotting garbage, everywhere.<br /><br />The same applies to the corporate media. Kevin did get a couple of good stories but they dried up with mention of the Supreme Court&nbsp; judges using Indian children for pedophilia. Similarly, when Kevin was beaten up or his documents stolen, the police and courts refused to act despite video footage of the theft. Why would they? They regarded the murder of thousands of Aboriginal children as "too big a task to investigate."<br /><br />Church. Corporations. Academia. Media. Law. Police. That leaves the government. Recently the Canadian government absolved the Church of any liability for its crimes. Kevin wrote to me Tuesday:<br /><br />"Yes, all the churches have been granted effective immunity; Indian Affairs announced so last February when they said there will be no criminal prosecution for anything that went on in the rez schools. Disgusting. Natives cannot sue the churches after the settlement - that was part of the deal the AFN (Assembly of First Nations) did on behalf of all the survivors, without consulting them once. It's as bad a crime as the original atrocities."<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />&nbsp;Kevin's <i>Love and Death in the Valley</i> <a href="http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=11639">is available here</a>. He&nbsp; is&nbsp; an excellent writer.&nbsp;  I also recommend you visit Kevin's <a href="http://www.hiddenfromhistory.org/">webpage&nbsp; </a><br />and donate if you can. He represents the single greatest threat to the Illuminati&nbsp; in Canada today. He is being followed by police and subject to increasing organized Internet smear attacks. He ministers to the homeless and lives on a shoe string. <br /><br />The Illuminati want the land and the water rights. The Aboriginals are the only people standing in their way. Vancouver is hosting the 2010 Winter Olympics and Canada's misdeeds, like China's, could attract worldwide attention.<br /><br />In his book, <i>Love and Death in the Valley,</i> Kevin muses on the disconnect between what people profess and what they actually do. <br /><br />"The most successful minister in the church I found is the man or woman who can function as an efficient dissociated personality, regularly professing one thing and practising the opposite." (151)<br /><br />Kevin Annett demonstrates the impact people can have when they act on their beliefs. As such, he is an inspiration to me.<br />------------------------------<br />See also my&nbsp; <a href="http://www.henrymakow.com/did_the_illuminati_exterminate.html">"Did the Illuminati Exterminate Canadian Indian Children?"<br /></a><br />and&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.henrymakow.com/when_illuminati_shills_fear_ex.html"> "When Pedophile Judges Fear Exposure"</a> <br /><br />&nbsp;<div><br /></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/kevin_annett_rips_the_mask_fro.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/kevin_annett_rips_the_mask_fro.html</guid>
         <category>THE CONTROLLERS</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 01:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />Rev Wright and Obama- <a href="http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/barack-obama-is-a-closet-homosexual-listen-to-the-rev-james-david-manning/">Gay Lovers?</a><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/rev_wright_and_obama_gay.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/rev_wright_and_obama_gay.html</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><b>I am a submissive woman.&nbsp;</b> I long to be with a man who has strong leadership skills, someone who is not hesitant to exert his power in a relationship with me.&nbsp; Someone I can take care of and look after and be a helpmate to but also depend on to take charge when needed.&nbsp; Someone I can complement, not someone I can dominate.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />But today's men need to learn the difference between responsible leadership and abuse.&nbsp; In the upside down world of feminism we live in today, I generally come across two types of men: &nbsp;<br /><br />The first type is the kind who have been brainwashed by the feminist movement and think that what women want is for their men to worship and idolize them.&nbsp; Nothing turns me off faster than a man who worships me, puts my needs and desires before his own and bends over backward to fulfill my every whim.&nbsp; I run from men like that.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />The other type of men I come across are the ones who call themselves 'dominant,' but are actually just emotionally abusive (and sometimes physically) and don't have a clue that they are.&nbsp; They are the ones who will go all the way to China or Russia looking for a 'submissive' wife, because they say there are no submissive women in the United States.&nbsp; There is such a complete disconnect in the brains of these men, it is beyond me how they function in any relationship.&nbsp; What they don't realize is that women (yes, even here in the US) are inherently submissive, to one degree or another.&nbsp; It's in our DNA.&nbsp; It is hard-wired into us (in the same way your masculinity is hard-wired into you), in spite of the fact that feminism has done its level best to squash it.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />To the men in the first category:&nbsp; Go home.&nbsp; There is no hope for you.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />To the men in the second category:&nbsp; Any woman who truly loves you will go to the ends of the earth for you.&nbsp; She will feed you and take care of you until death.&nbsp; She will bear and raise your children and take care of your home.&nbsp; She will put her feet to the fire for you.&nbsp; She'll stand by you and support you through the worst life has to dish out.&nbsp; She'll put her life on the line for you and she will do it all without reservation - as long as you are treating her well.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />Start NOT treating her well, start being disrespectful and criticizing everything she does, and all you'll do is piss her off.&nbsp; All of a sudden you have this furious woman in front of you, and you have no idea what she's angry about.&nbsp; Inevitably, because you cannot see where you are doing anything wrong, you'll then shift the blame and accuse her of being an angry feminist, thereby sabotaging the relationship and dooming it to fail.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />Newsflash:&nbsp; She doesn't have an anger problem.&nbsp; She has an abusive husband problem.&nbsp; Most women with an IQ above 40 will not stay with an abusive husband.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />Let me say it again:&nbsp; If you treat your woman well, you won't have to ask for her submission.&nbsp; She will give it willingly, freely, happily and without reservation until the day you die. <br /><br />Most of the men in this category do not know what the word 'marriage' or 'partnership' truly means.&nbsp; They carry a deep-seated contempt for women in general that is apparent in almost everything they do.&nbsp; They don't view their women as partners or helpmates; they view them as property and treat them as less than human, with barely a shred of simple common decency or respect.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />So what does it mean to treat a woman well?&nbsp; What do women really want?&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />Well, of course we want your leadership and direction.&nbsp; We like our men to be men.&nbsp; We want you to be strong and decisive in the ways we aren't.&nbsp; We love that you can get the lid off the flipping pickle jar for us, or move a cement step to free a trapped kitten.&nbsp; We LOVE that mysterious masculine side of you.&nbsp; But we also want and need your respect, approval and appreciation.&nbsp; That's not feminism talking, it's simple human nature.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />I once had a conversation with a man who had just been through a devastating divorce after a 27-year marriage to a woman he obviously loved very much.&nbsp; He said to me, "She was so beautiful and I was always so proud to have her for my wife."&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />I asked (gently), "Did you ever tell her that?" &nbsp;<br /><br />"NO!!!"&nbsp; He said, as if it was beneath his macho dignity to actually compliment his wife.&nbsp; It made me want to cry for her.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />H - E - L - L - O !?!&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />Guys, come on.&nbsp; Get a grip.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />Just because you expect a meal to be on the table at a certain time (and we are fine with the fact that you expect it) would it kill you to give the courtesy of a simple thank you when it is? <br /><br />There's a huge difference between saying, with a twinkle in your eye:<br /><br />"I'd like you to wear this today." <br /><br />and <br /><br />"Take that thing off, it makes your ass look fat."&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />There's a huge difference between:<br /><br />"I realize you have a different opinion, but I'm going to do it this way instead." <br /><br />and <br /><br />"Your opinion means nothing." &nbsp;<br /><br />There's a huge difference between: <br /><br />"I appreciate all that you do." <br /><br />and <br /><br />"It's your JOB, woman!"&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />There's a huge difference between:<br /><br />"I like that you don't expect me to take you out to expensive restaurants every weekend." <br /><br />and <br /><br />"Hey, you're a cheap date!"&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />and<br /><br />"I like your hair better down." <br /><br />As opposed to:<br /><br />"Your hair looks like hell up."&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />See the difference?&nbsp; I am constantly amazed by the number of men who don't.&nbsp; The first statements are relationship builders and the second statements are relationship destroyers.&nbsp; To a man, it's a subtle distinction.&nbsp; To a woman, it's a sledgehammer.&nbsp; The first statements are what women thrive on.&nbsp; They are what create and sustain that undying lifelong devotion for her partner.&nbsp; The second statements are emotionally hurtful and abusive and make her feel disrespected, unappreciated and unloved.&nbsp; They slowly tear down her self-worth and self-esteem.&nbsp; Do that long enough and she will eventually go away, whether you are a good provider or not.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar:&nbsp; Show your appreciation and she will do more of whatever it is you appreciate.&nbsp; Constantly criticize everything she does, and she will do less, if any at all.&nbsp; Simple common courtesy like saying thank you for a meal or showing your appreciation to your partner doesn't make you any less of a man; quite the opposite.&nbsp; It assures her that she is important to you and it goes a long way toward building the kind of trust and loyalty that lasts forever.&nbsp; It's the key to creating that submissive woman you all claim to want.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />It's not rocket science, guys.&nbsp; It takes very little effort on your part, with lifelong rewards.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />Feminism has been both bad and good for society.&nbsp; On the good side, it empowered women to get out of truly abusive relationships, something that was very much needed back in the day. But one of the many ways in which it has been bad is that it has taught men to use 'feminism' as a scapegoat for their own lack of communication and relationship skills.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />Where are the REAL men, the ones who can dance on the edge of dominance without falling off the cliff into abusiveness? <br />-----<br /><br /><b>Male Response:</b><br /><br />Dear Henry<br /><br />I could write a long reply to this. What many don't realize (and some<br />do) is that while roles and identities for women have changed over<br />the last 40 years due to "feminism," nothing similar has happened for<br />men.<br /><br />Emma's letter shows just how confused us men actually are today and<br />have been in the past. The MSM has done nuthing to give us a clear<br />role models either!<br /><br />Singing "Girl you gotta love your man, take him by the hand, make him<br />understand" Jim Morrison<br /><br />-Freddie<br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/i_am_a_submissive_woman.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/i_am_a_submissive_woman.html</guid>
         <category>Letters</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 02:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Women See Male Leadership as Love</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="drunkdame1.jpg" src="http://www.henrymakow.com/drunkdame1.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="170" width="251" /></span> <div><b>by Henry Makow Ph.D.</b><br /><br /><b><br />If a man cannot perform in bed, h</b>e is called "impotent."&nbsp; The woman feels unloved and unwanted.<br /><br />However, outside the bedroom, if a man doesn't demonstrate his power , he is considered "enlightened" and "progressive."<br /><br />But somewhere in their subconscious, women still feel let down. For centuries, women (and children) have relied on men to help define their&nbsp; lives. Men are failing their families when they buy into egalitarian feminist shibboleths and try to be "nice guys."<b><br /></b><br /><br />Marriage is the exchange of female power for male power expressed as love. Women crave male power because in their minds, <i>it is love. <br /></i><br />When a man fails to lead his family, and allows them to manipulate him, women (and children) feel unloved and consequently have less respect and love for him.  <br /><br />The old proverb, "Spare the rod, spoil the child" applies. Women and children feel most secure when husband/ father asserts his just control. It means he loves them. Failure to take charge is interpreted as neglect.<br /><br />Thus, a man must claim power at the outset, and never let it slip from his grasp. He will be tested. But if I am right, women are testing his love.<br /><br />This is how women love and what they really want: to be consulted yes, but to surrender to the one man worthy of their sacrifice. <br /><br /><b>THE HIDDEN AGENDA</b><br /><br />Thus the Lucifer-loving central bankers have used feminism, the mass media and the courts to banish love by undermining male power and authority. They have brainwashed generations of men and women to think of themselves as equal and identical.&nbsp; The goal is to destroy the family which obstructs their plan to enslave humanity, mentally and spiritually if not physically. (They must do this to protect their untenable monopoly on credit and ensure we repay money they created out of nothing.)<br /><br />Gender, love and indeed sex are largely about power.&nbsp; Men want to possess a woman. Women <a href="http://www.savethemales.ca/000441.html">want to be possessed.</a> But when you equalize power, you neuter both sexes. Men no longer assert their power; women no longer cultivate their charms.&nbsp; The active-passive; yin-yang mainspring of the universe is neutralized. All that is left is sex in an alcoholic stupor.<br /><br /><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7389980.stm">A recent study </a>showed that a third of young men and a quarter of young women in Europe use alcohol and drugs to have promiscuous sex, many before the age of 16, resulting in unwanted pregnancies and STD's. <br /><br />In the UK, <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/columnists/columnists.html?in_article_id=563796&amp;in_page_id=1772&amp;in_author_id=502&amp;in_check=N">arrests of young women</a> for being drunk and disorderly have shot up %50. The <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7401826.stm">crime rate is up 25%</a> in the last three years alone.<br /><br />Women are being left high and dry (or drunk) <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ask_dr_helen_8/">as men bail on the concept of marriage altogether. </a><br /><br />Female sex appeal is a function of their fertility. It will quickly fade, and they will finally realize that a sinister power has subverted our culture and betrayed them. They need to form families when they are young and desirable to men or risk being alone for the rest of their lives.<br /><br />Young men must again think of themselves primarily as family leaders and builders, and look for a good woman to be wife and mother of their children. They must quickly weed out the damaged women, or find one that is still salvageable. They must test her over time to make sure she is devoted and not only willing but happy to accept their leadership. If she has another big priority, move on. <br /><br />Men, confine yourself to women who look up to you. If you're looking up to her, the relationship is doomed. <br /><br /><b>SOCIAL ENGINEERING</b><br /><br />By "empowering" women, society is essentially outfitting them with penises. These women have been conditioned to distrust and constantly challenge any man. I have heard stories where husbands and wives fight over the direction they will take on a Sunday afternoon walk. <br /><br />When my wife and I walk the dog, I decide where we will go. When my wife wants to go in another direction, she will tell me, and usually I will consent to make her happy.&nbsp;&nbsp; She gives me the power; I use it to make her happy, within my limits. <br /><br />Many men leave their families because they are "married to Mommy" and constantly "walking on eggshells." In practice "equality" for a feminist usually means she's in charge and her husband is her puppet who must love her as she thinks fit. "Equality" means at best she will castrate him; at worst, abuse him. <br /><br />There are many exceptions to this rule I imagine: couples who think alike and have great "equal" marriages. I haven't met any but I'd like to hear about them.&nbsp; <br /><br />In a marriage, I believe a woman must chose between power and love. She cannot have both.&nbsp; The role of a wife is to empower her husband so he can love her better as he sees fit. Of course it all depends on a woman finding a man she can trust wholeheartedly.<br /><br />We must get over the notion that we'll be loved for our looks or personality or talent. These contribute but ultimately men love women who look after them, and vice-versa.<br /><br />In our intimate relations,<i> men need to project power</i> plain and simple. First men must gain self confidence by realizing personal goals and earning the respect of their fellow males. <br /><br />Sexual desire makes men overestimate women. We must take sex and beautiful women off the pedestal. Our cultural values were/are created by a sick satanic sex cult, cabalistic Freemasonry, which thinks sex is the Holy Grail. <br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />Masculinity is defined by power. Men must assert their personal vision and responsible leadership in spite of constant sabotage by the mass media and government. Otherwise women and children will feel betrayed and unloved, become more unmanageable, and trigger family breakdown.<br /><br />In reality men and women were designed to complement, love and need each other.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.savethemales.ca/000180.html">Gender wars</a> were created by the same people who created all wars, the cabalistic central bankers&nbsp; who have been waging a secret satanically-inspired feud against humanity for centuries-- to divide, degrade, demoralize and ultimately to enslave us.&nbsp; &nbsp;  <br />-----<br /><br />Check out "A Woman's Lament" Below&nbsp; (scroll down)<br /><br /></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/women_interpret_male_power_in.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/women_interpret_male_power_in.html</guid>
         <category>How Heterosexuality Works</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 01:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="polish.gif" src="http://www.henrymakow.com/polish.gif" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="150" width="144" /></span> <div>Dear Dr Makow,<br /><br />My name is Krzysztof (Chris) and I live in south-western part of Poland. Currently I prepare for a Ph.D. in history while performing my duties as an assistant at the university. I would like to share some views about the reality of changing Polish society and especially the impact of that change for the male-female relationships.<br /><br />I have been following Your online publications on feminism for about a year and it really helped me to define issues which I managed to observe only in part before.<br /><br />First let me state that in the West the general view of Polish society<br />and women as traditional and conservative is based on outdated and<br />somehow misperceived data. The fact is (as I can see it almost every<br />day) that Polish women increasingly adopt the models of behavior<br />imported from Western societies. The pattern of male role for young<br />females usually comes from mass media and movies such as highly popular<br />American "Friends" mini-series and its many Polish copies. <br /><br />Students of both sexes also watch our own movie productions which at first glance<br />seem to endorse traditional values but usually vindicate dysfunctional<br />family relations, divorces, single career model and inability for<br />healthy engagement between man and woman. The form of the message<br />remains familiar (in order to attract more conservative viewers) but the<br />content is undoubtedly poisonous.<br /><br />Some people might argue that the alternative reality of television or<br />internet is not affecting anyone at all. Unfortunately the impact is<br />quite destructive.<br /><br />I am now 25 years old and have been in several relationships with young<br />women. Although every one of them was different in character, they also<br />had some common feature - almost from the start they expected a<br />competition from my part. In one case a girl started to treat me as a<br />kind of purely physical satisfaction to her sexual eagerness. I just<br />could not imagine something like this adopted by woman! That limited<br />kind of relation could not last for long and finally broke down.<br /><br />&nbsp;Now I am single but basing on my experience I am looking for serious<br />relationship with a woman who will be ready to participate in my life.<br />Honestly, I am not without guilt when valuing wrong directions and my<br />priorities in estimating female qualities changed too. Actually, the male<br />attitude toward women has also been greatly distorted and I could name<br />many examples of such behavior among my friends. It seems obvious and<br />natural for them to treat women as sexual toys made only for temporary<br />exploitation. Their focus remains mainly physical - the greater breast,<br />the more&nbsp; attractive girl. On the other hand almost none of them manages<br />to stay in a relationship for more than few months. <br /><br />As I see men are increasingly disoriented as well as women. When it comes to the<br />relationship crisis among women I can recall one case of my female<br />friend with whom I failed to form a permanent understanding. Her<br />boyfriend left her and she asked for my advice on why that happened and<br />what to do next. When I tried to influence her by carefully explaining<br />that her readiness for sexual contacts comes too early and forms the<br />source of her loneliness, she was surprised. According to her opinion it<br />was necessary for a girl to be physically attractive first and seduce a<br />man so that he could not leave her. "Did it work?" - I asked. "No" was<br />her reply, nevertheless she felt insulted for some time by our<br />conversation.<br /><br />In general the trends among young women and students at all are turning<br />to complicate relations of young generation. It manifests in their daily<br />activities - spending more time in front of PCs, watching irrational<br />entertainment shows, concentrating on their temporary feelings with<br />movies, games, porn, music in earphones. Much of the time of young<br />people's day is spent on completely unproductive and usually<br />brainwashing activities perceived by them as "freedom". Their own<br />"space" prevents them from conducting proper human relations and exchange<br />of ideas. In many cases they are unable to find words expressing their<br />opinions or form correct sentence.<br /><br />To be optimistic, there are still people who try to define their purpose<br />in healthy way and I hope they are prepared to bring positive change to<br />our societies.<br /><br />I believe Your website is adding to the benefit of those who want to<br />maintain their human identity.<br /><br />Thank You,<br /><br />Sincerely,<br /><br />Chris<br />-----------------<br /><br /><a href="http://www.polishmarriage.org/polishwomen.html">Polish Women&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (an idealistic from a Marriage website)<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /><b>Polish women </b>are unlike Western women due to the historical, cultural, and political situation of Poland. The woman in Poland has always been put on the pedestal. She has been cherished as a homemaker, a mother to her children and a great wife. She has always been a pillar of a family, many times working outside of the home and taking care of her husband and her children on top of that.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Since Polish society gives a high priority of raising children, the women are given the responsibility of raising children and caring for their family. They are the ones that get up early in the morning, prepare breakfast and get the kids ready to school. Many Polish women are stay-at-home mothers. They have enough time and energy to take care of the children, play with them, and make sure that they have everything they need. There are some Polish women, however, who work professionally outside of home. In such situations, small children are either in a day care during they day or spend the day at one of the relatives. Since extended family is very important in Poland, the more popular arrangement is that either a grandma or aunt will care for the children while the mother is at work.<br /><br /><br />Polish women take care of their husbands just as much as they take care of their children. <br /><br />As a matter of fact, the women work double jobs while their husbands usually work at only one job. The majority of women work professionally outside of their homes. The jobs they hold are usually in the areas of health care and education. Demanding as those jobs may be, the Polish women are expected to give the 100% of their efforts to caring for their husband and the household. Right after they come back home from work they begin their homely duties such as cleaning, cooking, washing dishes and doing laundry. The women work hard so that when their husbands come home they can enjoy the atmosphere of a clean home. Polish women take pride in being able to offer freshly cooked meal to their husbands and allow them to relax in the atmosphere of their home. <br /><br />Apart from extensive knowledge on how to take care of their families' appetites and leisure time, women born in Poland know a lot about being economical and diligent. They won't waste anything that can still be of use unless the family decides otherwise. Moreover, some of them can even fix broken things, like scratches on walls, broken windows or... leaking faucets, but they do appreciate if a man can do it for them. Polish females marry on average at age 23 and men at age 26. Once they get married, they hardly ever divorce. Divorce is not as prevalent in Poland as it is in many of the other former communist countries such as Russia. This difference is associated with Poland being a traditionally Catholic country, where over 90% are Catholic. Catholicism forbids married couples to divorce. Even if they do divorce, Polish females are unwilling to remarry. Typically, in a divorce women receive custody of the children. In 1991, women were granted sole custody of the children in over 70% of the divorce cases involving children under age 18. As wives, Polish women are very faithful and devoted. Once their trust is broken, however, they are not likely to trust somebody else. Due to their upbringing, they are taught to be faithful to one man and one man only.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /><br /><br />Polish women have always had equal access to education and today they have higher levels of educational attainment than young Polish men. Poland, like the rest of the Soviet alliance in Eastern Europe, offered women more opportunities for higher education and employment, than did most West European countries. Many professions, such as architecture, engineering, and university teaching, employed a considerably higher percentage of women in Poland than in the West, and over 60 percent of medical students in 1980 were women. In many households in the 1980s, women earned more than their husbands. Yet the socialist system that yielded those statistics also uniformly excluded women from the highest positions of economic and political power. The end of communist government brought a new debate about women's role in Polish society. A significant part of society saw the political transformation as an appropriate time for women to return full-time to the home after communism had forced them into the workplace and weakened the Polish family.<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /><br /></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/_dear_dr_makowmy_name.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/_dear_dr_makowmy_name.html</guid>
         <category>Letters</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 00:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />Freemasonry-Midwife to an <a href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Freemasonry.htm">Occult Empire</a><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/freemasonrymidwife_to_an_occul.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/freemasonrymidwife_to_an_occul.html</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 03:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />Feminist Icon, <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article3866798.ece">Lousy Mother</a><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/feminist_icon_lousy_mother.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/feminist_icon_lousy_mother.html</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br /><a href="http://www.newswithviews.com/Collins/phillip25.htm">Darwinism and Occult </a>Pt 2<br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/darwinism_and_occult_pt_2.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/darwinism_and_occult_pt_2.html</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />Eustace Mullins Video-<a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7644857907453201814&amp;q=&amp;hl=en">The World Order</a><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/eustace_mullins_videothe_world.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/eustace_mullins_videothe_world.html</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br /><br />Why men don't marry: <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/ask_dr_helen_8/">174 men reply</a><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.henrymakow.com/why_men_dont_marry_174.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.henrymakow.com/why_men_dont_marry_174.html</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
