TIME's Mother's Day Turnoff

May 13, 2012

o-TIME-MAGAZINE-570.jpg

Just in time for Mother's Day, TIME is featuring a mother breast-feeding her toddler son. The three-year-old boy, who's old enough to walk and talk on his own, is also old enough to stand on a chair to nurse his mother's bare breast for the camera.  LC Vincent thinks this is the Illuminati's way of telling the rest of us we will be on the government tit for a long time. At the very least, it's a dig at Motherhood and a Mother's Day turnoff. 








by LC Vincent
(henrymakow.com)



No doubt you've already seen or heard the controversy over TIME Magazine's latest cover shot of a young blonde woman breast-feeding her young son, (reputedly 3 years old although he could easily pass for 6 or 7) to illustrate a story based upon the latest parental trend labeled "Attachment Parenting."

The article focuses on Dr. Bill Sears' "attachment parenting method" that first became popular in the '90s. Sears advocated  extended breast-feeding, co-sleeping and "baby wearing" where an infant is "worn" by their parents through slings. 

Of course, it is simple to criticize TIME for this outrageous cover, and its "in-your-face" assault on American motherhood and childhood.  One can only guess at the mindset of the mother who would blithely subject her son to perpetual ridicule as the boy featured sucking his mother's breast in public on TIME's cover.   

HIDDEN AGENDA?

Because Dr. Bill Sears, has coined the term "Attachment Parenting," are to believe that TIME Magazine has deigned it imperative to explore this topic and present it before a stunned public as if hundreds of years of prior parenting skills had suddenly become obsolete overnight? 

Yet by placing this theory, which is all it is, directly in the face of mainstream America, traditional parenting skills and approaches are now apparently over-night anachronisms.

MAD-Magazine-Time-Breastfeeding-Cover.jpg
(Mad Magazine caption: "Put your creepy milk-boob away and start picking up the pieces of your child's shattered life now that you've turned him into an Internet meme.") 





TIME Magazine is a house organ of The Illuminati, as are most networks, film studios and media outlets of our nation.  However, TIME has always held a special place as the arbiter of whatever  trend would receive their imprimatur of importance and relevancy.

The Illuminati have used this cover illustration to infect the American psyche with a "meme" (mental virus) crafted for maximum social disruption and destruction.

First, let us examine the subjects and props of the cover.  We see a young, attractive blonde female offering an exposed breast to her very mature looking "three" year old son.

Her pose is extraordinarily casual as she faces the viewer, a relaxed hand on her hip, as  if what she is doing is totally natural and normal. 

She is wearing a black leotard that is very unisexual in character, an article of clothing which could easily be worn by a male or female.  She offers her exposed LEFT breast to her "son", who is also looking at the viewer and facing the camera over his LEFT shoulder. 

Her LEFT arm wraps around her son, holding him close to her, protecting him from the viewer, while he stands on a foot stool, a prop which visually amplifies his youth and immaturity.

Note, however, that her young son is dressed in green military fatigue pants and olive drab sweatshirt. His dress is no more accidental than her clothing, or any of the above mentioned visual important props scattered throughout this cover.  Yet what does it all mean?

From a symbolic perspective, The Mother represents The Nanny State -- our new U.S. Government. 

We, as its immature "children" will continue to suck off the teat of the new socialist welfare state being erected before our eyes while American manhood will be permanently reduced to a state of perpetual dependency and need. 

The American military, as well as the America male, will become suckers off the welfare teat of the American government.   This situation of permanent subservience and servility to the new American Nanny State is the future vision

image00235.jpgThe Illuminati have for us, as served into the mainstream of our mental perceptual sub-conscious via the establishment organ of TIME Magazine.

This blatant yet subconscious technique, known as "the revelation of the method" is a primal factor in Illuminati warfare against the psyche of the American citizen.

It is the human equivalent of taking a young pup and "rubbing his face in it" so to speak.  The message is essentially the same.  This is to be accepted as our new reality, and our new stark socialist reality is the new dependency and subservience of The American Male and everything masculine to the perpetual subservience of The Nanny State.

In reality this TIME cover is the emasculation of both The American Male and Female.

It is the path and the goal of The Illuminati symbolically laid bare, flowing from the same hidden stream that elevated an unknown, itinerant poster stapler to the Presidency of the United States.
 
The Illuminati never do anything without a purpose, and the latest cover photo of TIME magazine reveals the true agenda which they have planned for us and for our children. 

Our choice is simple -- do we devolve into perpetual suckers off the government teat?  Or do we bid a permanent good-bye to this blatant media manipulation and reject The Nanny State and all the symbolic  puppetry of The Illuminati once and for all?

--------

lcvincent.blogspot.com     [email protected]





Comments for "TIME's Mother's Day Turnoff "

Michael said (May 15, 2012):

Time magazines cover picture may be reflective/and suggestive of the American dilemma as JC Vincent believes, but that's been true for quite some time: Too many Americans, unlike the spirit of their founders and earlier generations in the last 60 years have morphed into a bunch of whiney-thumb(breast) sucking
cry-babies crying for their government to take care of them in much too many ways, and letter's control-obsessed officials always ready to offer help in that regard.

But, most of the uproar I heard was over the issue of breast feeding being depicted. My own mother tried to breast feed as long as she could (3 years if able), for the health of her children. It would seem it should be a very natural, nurturing thing, as depicted. I think the over sexualized emphasis on breasts in our culture, shocks people when they see them-as attractive as they are-doing something they were made to do do..feed babies and young children.


David said (May 14, 2012):

Surely the purpose Time front cover is to show children are a burden

The picture says: a baby on your breast is a chain around your neck!


Julian Lee said (May 14, 2012):

My immediate thought on seeing that cover was:

"Oh, another psy-op to present motherhood and natural family in a negative way."
Yeah, real pro-Mother, pro-Family cover for Mother's Day, indeed. (Not.)

And think about it: Breastfeeding one's child is something universal, timeless, and central to life.
it seems Time/Newsweek would easily find a reason to feature a breastfeeding mother, maybe
even once a year like other regular subject features. (Like those on "the latest wonder drugs" or
"going to college") After all, their magazines are directed at humans.

But when's the last time you saw Time or Newsweek feature a mother breastfeeding -- in a positive or natural presentation?
I can't think of one instance, whether decorous or edgy.

Notice all these movie themes the past few years featuring an "evil" baby or an demonic child?
Same agenda. This Time cover is just more insidious anti-mother, anti-family, anti-child, and anti-nature propaganda
designed to make motherhood look ridiculous, bizarre, and unattractive.

The people running the media are sick, and evil.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at