Asim said (May 27, 2005):

Women who advocate being slutty really are hiding the painful rejection that they faced when they were a child. A woman's desire has always been to be loved and wanted, as a child from her parents and as an adult, from her husband. When this love is denied, they pretend not to be affected by it and simply internalise their pain. Instead, what they end up as is hardly desirable to anyone-cold, remorseless, neurotic, psychotic and highly erotic! I should know, I dated someone who had slept around a few guys and always bragged about how empowering it was for her to be in control of all the men she had been with. Well, her true self couldn't be hidden any longer when I started dating her, as she realised to her horror, that I was actually a nice and genuine guy. Where did her 'be a proud slut attitude go?' This woman turned to jelly in front of me and begged for me to be with her....forever! Just goes to show that once you tap into the raw nerve of every repressed woman who hides behind a slutty image, there is a wounded child crying to be accepted and loved. But of course, feminism would tell you otherwise Henry, as you've so eloquently pointed out time and again.

Gina said (May 25, 2005):

Dear Henry,

I read that article on casual sex and it leaves out some important information. Women are not constructed for casual sex. Their bodies,
particularly the uterus are quite susceptible to infection in a way that mens's are not. Womens' immune systems are not as quick to attack organisms that come in via the cervix, because their bodies assume that organisms entering through that route might have something to do with conception.

Consequently, women become more ill from sexually transmitted diseases than
do men. They become sicker, faster and they have more consequences.

While I believe that women are as smart as men and have important functions at all levels of our society, I strongly resent the notion that we can "overcome" our biology with will power. It is ludicrous and silly. What is
the real benefit of promiscuity, anyway? I think that one quickly learns that if a man is not in love, he won't be a very good lover anyway. The whole thing is absurd and it is not liberation, but degradation.

Lisa said (May 25, 2005):

I love it when MEN write about what they have never experienced. Not all of us (women) are prudes or puritans……………..Thank God. I do not intend to live forever with everyone I date. Duh.

John said (May 25, 2005):

Dear Dr Makow

Your articles are always thought provoking but I never understand how one can take action to reverse the course!

It is always the same cast of characters doing the same thing but no one opposes or confronts them!

I am all ears lets hear some suggestions!

John,

You know the adage, "if you have to ask the price, you can't afford it."
Well, if you need to ask what to do, you wouldn't do it anyway.

henry

TJ said (May 24, 2005):

I read the article on iVillage and these women will eventually live a life of regrets.

They don't look at it from a guy's perspective. Guys interested in a long term relationship won't even approach a slut or whore unless they are losers themselves.

Women have a shelf-life, an expiry date so to speak. Men don't vocalize it, but when the boys get together this is brought up when talking about women.

When a woman hits 40 years (maybe too generous) and is not married with kids she will live to be old, bitter and lonely. Well, at least she will still have her lesbo feminist friends.

Judith said (May 24, 2005):

Re: Your comments on feminism: Right on. I was in academia when they moved in enmasse supported by foundation grants. Now casual sex. Do or can most women achieve orgasm or any real sexual pleasure without loving her partner in the full sense. I never could. To deny women (and men) the ultimate spiritual and physical beauty of loveinspired sex seems to me the ultimate enslavement. The television sitcoms have done their job. Thanks for keeping up the resistance.

Bruce said (May 24, 2005):

I just wanted to say that your articles are awesome. They've had a potent inpact on me ever since I've started reading them. You're truly number 1 in exposing the Feminist Agenda.

I'd personally like to thank you for giving me a perpsective on relationships that I never would have had without your articles.

Bruce,26, from Toronto

Dear Bruce,

Bruce,

You are the reason I write, so others will not suffer from the arrested development that affected me and so many males of my generation due to feminism. Thanks for this vindication.

Henry

Stephen said (May 24, 2005):

According to the British Marriage Guidance Council, 80% of all marriages in the UK end after less than 2 years now.

People are subconsciously mind controlled and heavily programmed by films, TV, musc and the Internet and pornography to believe this or that person is right for them and yet they all end up hating each other and the children born are fatherless, and turn to drugs, drink, hooliganism, vandalism and general and rebellious anti-social behaviour all the time.

The Labour Government are completely ineffectual and are just playing their part for their Illuminati Masters in the City of London, New York and Washington DC. The UK in regards to sex before marriage and proper, healthy and stable heterosexual relationships is finished unless the people stop thinkng like Sheeple and Lemmings and change their mind patterns and their perception of this reality and start to change the UK for the better, otherwise all hell will break loose here soon.

(Our London Correspondent)

Karen said (May 23, 2005):

How much confusion and illness at all levels we have created for ourselves by not only giving up, but condemning, what is so obviously natural. I wish there were more strong and honorable men willing to fulfill their roles and responsibilities, and more women willing to honor their nature, with conviction, strength and dignity. Thanks. (From a Naturopathic MD)

Deirdre said (May 23, 2005):

Great article. Thanks! Again this is why a lot of people choose to homeschool! At times I have thought we have done our children an injustice, but the proof is coming out in the pudding. Our teen and near teens are polite, have a great work ethic and know who they are! Recently my friends son has taken life guard training. He commented on an attractive girl (very), that she wasn’t that attractive because of what came out of her mouth! See young men can learn at home, that it is great to see an attractive gal, but to go deeper and find out what kind of character she has. The problem with our society is that there is no heart and soul in folks any more. Its all sex, sex, sex.

If we were all blind, we may think, act differently. But one has to be trained and willing to stay disciplined in their spirit about many things. (self control). My folks were married for fifty years, had seven children, endured the loss of grown children, illnesses, etc…, My Dad said he never paid attention to my Moms scars on her face due to cancer surgery. She held her head high and was a lady till the end. My Dad says the one thing he misses the most about my Mom is the spiritual and intellectual oneness they had together. He misses having someone to talk to about the things he is interested in.

Thanks again for your writing. You seem to encourage a lot of folks out there.

Gina said (May 23, 2005):

Dear Henry,

I read that article on casual sex and it leaves out some important information. Women are not constructed for casual sex. Their bodies,
particularly the uterus are quite susceptible to infection in a way that mens's are not. Womens' immune systems are not as quick to attack organisms that come in via the cervix, because their bodies assume that organisms entering through that route might have something to do with conception.

Consequently, women become more ill from sexually transmitted diseases than
do men. They become sicker, faster and they have more consequences.

While I believe that women are as smart as men and have important functions at all levels of our society, I strongly resent the notion that we can "overcome" our biology with will power. It is ludicrous and silly. What is the real benefit of promiscuity, anyway? I think that one quickly learns that if a man is not in love, he won't be a very good lover anyway. The
whole thing is absurd and it is not liberation, but degradation.

Hal said (May 22, 2005):

Henry~
Well done overview, brief but non-superfluous!

Of course I see it from two angles which would not be attractive to the
great "masses", needless to say, on the "unwashed", as your presentation
of the faults of over glamorizing immediate physical gratification. It
might even be, for many, repellent!

I would take it from the woman's primordial show of psycho-constitution of
mind-set dominated more by emotion than man's, allowing more resultant
condescensions to attacks on reason through appeal to emotion. I refer
here to the Eve/Nacash relationship. This should serve both men and women
well in establishing awareness to guide performance of either in their
inter-relating. Such awareness demands the companionship of self-control
of the #1 human fallacy, "greed"!

The second angle applicable is that of Christ, who instructed men not to
desecrate innocence, and women to acknowledge their fundamental biological
construction as it involves both countenance and duty.
~Hal~

Tom said (May 22, 2005):

Dear Henry:

You know we gotta be near the absolute end when this kind of thing is being pushed on the poor dippy women who will sit still for it.

After this—give this a good run—and a nunnery will look like a relief to them. I submit that if there is anything a reasonably uncrazy man likes less than a whore or a slut, it has yet to be revealed. George MacDonald (the 19th century Christian novelist) wrote a short story (I wish I could remember its name) in which a kind of wolf woman was at the center, a woman, he made plain in decorous 19th cent. language, was a predator against men and a terrifying creature raging around the landscape. One of these new ladies, as it were. God save us.

Deb said (May 22, 2005):

Hi Henry

Good one - as usual.

You touched on it in passing, but what hit me the hardest (being familiar with your previous articles) was that, in this, we have males with internalized homosexual values carrying on with females with internalized "male" (inverted homosexualist) values. How messed up is that ? Sounds like an orgy across species lines.

RW said (May 22, 2005):

Michele Boldrin and colleagues have apparently linked the existence of government pension programs such as Social Security to falling fertility rates.

http://www.nber.org/papers/W11146

Tamas said (May 22, 2005):

You provide the readers with eyeopeningly different perspectives on sexuality and marriage in contrast against the forcefed conteporary concepts.

Under this new light it is more understandable the relentless attacks and vile hate directed toward traditional Muslims. I have always regarded the worn-out anti-semitism accusation against them quite hollow, knowing that until Zionism arrived into the world stage, Jews not only lived, but strived among Muslims. (In sharp contrast to many European countries. )

However, it makes sense to undermine these cultures if these modern social engineers' goal is to destroy the nuclear family worldwide. The traditional Muslim family is still one of the few remaining obstacles to mold humanity into a faceless, virtually genderless grey mass.

Yours Truly,
Tamas

Pavlov said (May 22, 2005):

usually find it interesting that the hope of society rests partially upon demoralized people who have been conditioned to be all but unable to contemplate the truth as it is such a threat to their equally conditioned worldview. Such is the tyranny of the status quo. I believe that the truth will out, however. But, sadly, not without the carnage and pain.

Thanks for another great article, Henry.