Direct Link to Latest News

 

Doublespeak: An Illuminati Lexicon

June 9, 2016

george-orwell-quotes-sayings-lies-truth-famous.jpg


People who turn reality upside down must also 
turn language on its head. Black is white and white is black.

In the Illuminati's hands, language is mind control,
part of their satanic dispensation, i.e. the NWO.

Let's turn language back on them. Let's expose their
terrorism, racism, hate, anti-Semitism and heterophobia.












"We shall purify the idea [of God] by identifying it with the nation of Israel,  which has become its own Messiah. The advent of it will be facilitated by the final triumph of Israel... "  (i.e. Reality will be inverted so that Cabalists will replace God at the top. They will redefine reality according to their own interests and perversions)



(Updated from August 25, 2014) 
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
(henrymakow.com) 

In the meme above, Orwell did not go far enough.  Political language is not only designed to make lies sound truthful, but to create a bogus new reality based on the illuminati's sick political and occult agenda. 

This agenda can only be understood in terms of the big picture. The human malaise is due to the fact that the cabalist (Illuminati) bankers wish to depose God.

lya_otto_h_kahn.jpgIn practice, this means reality must be turned upside down. They, and not God (Reality), define "Truth." They define it in terms of their perversions and megalomania. As Otto Kahn, left, admitted above, they are using the Jewish people as their instrument to impose a permanent servitude on the human race.

"We shall purify the idea of God by identifying it with the Jewish people." In other words, the Jewish leadership, the Illuminati bankers, are God and Jews (and Freemasons) are their tools.

A system that turns Reality upside down is satanic. Lies are accepted as truth; evil is good; sick is healthy; ugly is beautiful and unnatural is natural. Cabalist Judaism, i.e. the Illuminati, is a satanic cult which advocates all these things.  Organized Jewry and Freemasonry are its instrument.

As mankind is inducted into this unreality, inevitably language itself is inverted and becomes a part of this oppression. 


Below I will give some examples of the warped Illuminati lexicon:---------------------------------------



israeli-terrorism.gif1. A "Terrorist" - is anyone who does not have an air force. Terrorists who are trained and funded by the Illuminati are not terrorists but "insurgents."  Palestinians who shoot popgun rockets and kill 1-2 Israelis are "terrorists." They have "terror-tunnels" although no terror attacks have emanated from them. Israelis who in 2014 used airplanes, missiles and bombs to kill over 2000 civilians, including 500 children, and demolish apartment blocks are not "terrorists." They are "defending themselves."

When Al Queda supposedly attacked the World Trade Center, they are "terrorists." When they are taking down Syria's Assad, they are "insurgents."

2. "Hate" and "hate-speech"  is any resistance to the Illuminati's hate-fuelled plan to dehumanize and enslave the human race.  The Talmud which regards non-Jews as animals destined to serve Jews is the real hate but it is never recognized as such. Instead, they invert reality and pretend that resisting their Talmudic agenda is "hate."  

3. "Anti Semitism" is supposedly a racial prejudice. However, Jewish bankers admit to using Jews to replace God, abolish all other races, nations and religions, and establish a satanic dispensation on earth. Using Jews in this fashion is the real "anti Semitism."  The Illuminati buzzword "anti Semitism" is actually resistance to this attack on God and man.

4. "Homophobia" is actually resistance to the Illuminati Jewish attack on gender identity under the guise of "gay rights."  The real hate is heterophobia, the attack on heterosexual institutions like marriage and family. There are four million links to "homophobia" on Google, 25 times as many as to "heterophobia" (160,000.)  Heterophobia is barely recognized as a word, an example of how language is used to reshape society.  
5. "Racism"  supposedly is hostility to other races.  In fact, when they don't claim to be superior, so-called "racists" are the best friends of other races because they like other races and don't want them to disappear. They celebrate differences and recognize that mankind is a family. Of course, no one should be expected to forfeit their racial and cultural heritage to satisfy a sick Zionist agenda. "Anti racists" favor miscegenation so that all races but Israeli Jews will disappear. 

6.  "Sexism" is supposedly hostility to women. In fact, sexism is heterosexuality. By acknowledging the differences between the sexes, sexists are woman's best friends. Similarly, "feminism" pretends to champion women while actually denying their femininity, encouraging lesbianism and depriving them of their special social role of mother and wife. To reject "sexism" is to hate women, deny inherent gender differences and to advocate women behave like men.

7. "Diversity" pretends to celebrate all ethnic and sexual differences. In fact, it is aimed at curbing genuine diversity by eradicating the influence of European Christian (heterosexual) culture.

einstein.jpg8. "Isolationist" is someone who opposes using their country's resources and young men to advance the banker's imperialist satanic agenda. "Fighting for freedom" is actually fighting for slavery (by expending the nation's resources fighting wars designed to enrich the bankers and kill goyim.)

9. "Human rights." These are privileges conferred on people who can be used to deprive other people of their human rights. "Gay rights," for example, are used to undermine the heterosexual and family identity of 98% of the population by convincing them that sick is healthy and unnatural is natural.

10. "Patriot" Act. The name uses the 9-11 Illuminati false-flag to gut real human rights and justify constant war and surveillance. It is the "Treason Act." Truly we have entered an Orwellian era of doublespeak.


Cabalists are reality creators. They make reality through their ownership of the education system and the mass media. Naturally, they use language to invert the truth and slander their opponents. In their hands, language is our enemy.

Let's reclaim those buzzwords and say, I am proud to be an "anti Semite, homophobe, sexist and racist" because it means I am resisting tyranny and defending my identity. I demand real diversity, human rights and patriotism, not doublespeak. 

George-Orwell-quotes.jpgThe only real "hate" and "terror" originates from the Illuminati who hate both God and man. 
 

---
I welcome your suggestions for the  Illuminati lexicon. 

Note: 1. Here are four more Illuminati buzzwords. "Conspiracy" - According to the Illuminati media, "conspiracy" denotes the preposterous concept that some people might target others without advertising the fact and providing the victim with advance warning. (In fact, Western society has been shaped by a Masonic-Jewish conspiracy against God and man.) "Tolerance" is applied selectively, e.g. tolerance for expression of occult beliefs; zero tolerance for Christian belief. Similarly, "Free Speech"  - Pornography is free speech but criticism of homosexuality is "hate." "Equality" - the notion that different things are the same. i.e. gay marriage is the same as heterosexual marriage; men in combat are the same as women in combat. 

First Comment from Michael G:


A few words I would add to your lexicon are these.

discrimination:  If you do not accept all forms of evil at all times, you are "discriminating".

globalism ("global warming", "global economy"):  The globalists are tacking the word "global" in front of everything these days.  Even before "global warming" was revealed as a hoax, it was never truly "global" because it did not occur across 100% of the globe concurrently.  There is no "global economy", only sovereign economies being attacked at the same time.  Another favorite phrase of theirs is "this affects us all" (i.e. "We are all one").  Does the death of Robin Williams really affect the citizens of Myanmar?  No.

empowerment:  Performing half-naked on stage and simulating sex acts is called "empowerment".  It is actually enslavement to handlers, immorality, and demonic forces.  Notice how the feminists never protest the sexual objectification of Miley Cyrus.  That is because she is promoting the same thing as they are:  Sexual immorality.


bullying:  If you don't support Gay Supremacy you are a "bully".  However, if you persecute Christians you are not.




Scruples, the game of moral dilemmas




Comments for " Doublespeak: An Illuminati Lexicon"

William G said (June 15, 2016):

Aristophanes in Plato's Symposium speaks of Zeus splitting human-like creatures in two. They were then condemned to go searching for their complements, or "soul mates", or "symbolons".

Zeus had said, "I have a plan which will enfeeble their strength and so extinguish their turbulence; men shall continue to exist, but I will cut them in two and then they will be diminished in strength and increased in numbers; this will have the advantage of making them more profitable to us."

The same applies to the words and symbols crafted today, and for the same purposes.

Imposing distorted meanings distorts the thoughts much as ingesting junk food affects the health of the bodies, and then the minds, of those who eat it.


David said (June 10, 2016):

My favorite double speak is the one bankers use: The "DEBT" you think you are getting from the bank or the bank's depositors is really a "CREDIT". Once you sign the promissory it becomes real money that is stolen from you and given back to you as a "LOAN" . The reason your signature is worth money is because you are the CREDITOR. In other words, you put the money in circulation for all of society to use because you are the creator of the VALUE of the money created by your signature.


TWH said (June 9, 2016):

I'll add a few buzzwords and their definitions:

anti-choice - applied to anyone who does not enthusiastically embrace the notion of sucking a living child in pieces out of his mother's womb.

extremist - anyone who has an idea that's at odds with the ever-evolving media (i.e. - international banker)-developed culture.

moderate - anyone who embraces culturally Marxist attitudes.

old white men - a phrase meant to denigrate proud white men who helped build the civilization in which we live and that, if applied to any other demographic, would result in the immediate excoriation by the aforementioned media culture of whoever used it and the expectation of apologies in perpetuity by said user.

carbon - an apparently horrible element made out to be worse than cyanide that allows the powers-that-be to further restrict our lives and extract more cash from us. Never mind the fact that carbon is part of, and utilized by, all living things.

freedom - anything designed to take the masses' eyes off what's really going on.

mass immigration - a wondrous, beautiful thing...but only in historically white countries. It's terrible in places like Tibet, of course.

cultural mosaic - all of society, except whites, heterosexuals, and/or Christians.


Anon said (June 9, 2016):

War office was changed to Ministry of Defence early last century or thereabouts - probably at the suggestion of Freud's nephew, Eddie Bernays (PR guru who advised global elites on various issues of manipulating information and language to dupe the masses = "perception management"...)

Also - in the comments section - someone asks....where do these changes in perception come from....well, apart from the social engineers e.g Tavistock and Frankfurt/Chicago School cultural marxists and the PR firms (e.g Burston Marsteller) there are the "Nudge Units" in USA and UK and elsewhere - the UK nudge group is run by a Jew and is called the Behavioural Insights Team..

Once a consensus is created then the duped masses and chattering classes police themselves through fear of stepping out of line and away from the consensus, as that ca not only lead to social ostaricization but increasingly these days can lead to fines and loss of job etc...In other words - refusing to engage in doublespeak and political correctness results in thoughtcrime (which is actually rational, critical thinking based in natural law and reason, not moral relativism or doublethink).

Humanitarian interventions are all the rage - intervening militarily to bomb the shit out of countries whose popuplation is supposedly suffering under a dictator....

This is an adjunct to the War is peace or Neo-con endless war doctrine - especially codified in the "war on terror" (actually a war OF terror by elites and elite-controlled ZOGs against the global population)....The mantra is that in order to attain peace there must be an endless war....on terror....against "communists"....against "aggressors" (e.g Russia)...etc etc....

There will always be an enemy that threatens "peace" (i.e threatens the NWO Illuminati power hegemony) so there will always be war.

Money = debt. Hermetic/Babylonian/Cabalist dual perception money magik.


-

War office was changed to Ministry of Defence

coz War in minds of the masses = aggression and death.....Defence = valiant protection of the homeland...

Office = drudgery and work and toil, parochial and worldly.......conversely Ministry = holy, spiritual...justified...righteous...

= perception management...

Also meant to add - common purpose etc promote NLP - Neuro-linguistic programming....re-defining and manipulating language and communication to fit the NWO psy-op Freudian mass psyche manipulation agenda on a mass and individual and community level, from corporate boardrooms to village halls to schoolrooms..to government departments and press offices.


Tony B said (June 9, 2016):

Very happy to see both this article and the additions of commenters.

I tried to make Willis Carto and the rest of "The Spotlight" staff understand this very thing a decade and a half ago but didn't have your clear language to express myself. Carto insisted on using the mainstream media "bible" in the manner of expression for the paper which I kept telling him was the weapon of his enemies.

An example is that the media always capitalizes their pampered co-conspirators such as congress (always Congress) which, by itself, is NOT a proper name, phrase or complete title and is NOT deserving of capitalization which always gives legitimacy to a word or phrase. For that same reason reversed, I find myself not capitalizing words that normally should be, such as "talmud." That is also an effective weapon. But today's journalists, many of whom do not have a clue as to when to use "a" or "an," know by "education" mind control, every last politically correct mis-use of the language, thinking them correct. In fact, that is a major purpose of government schools, from kindergarten through college post graduates. HOME SCHOOL!

Perhaps it would be a good idea to append newly noticed mis-definitions, etc., of which readers become aware, to regular posts under "Dishonesty in language" or some such title.


JG said (June 9, 2016):

I've often wondered who the "spin doctors" are that come up with all these language defaults that are so poorly disguised and peddled as flat out lies divorced from all reality.

Codewords seem to be the hot phrase now among the candidates these days.Maybe Bernie Sanders could release his language "codebook" to the public to help us figure it all out. You might be offending someone by using one of these new codewords that you're not even aware of.

Whatever happened to the 'good old days' when terrorists were called "freedom fighters" and your everyday corporate thief was just a man trying to "turn a profit".

It's all nothing but Greek Urban Legend to me.


Gordon said (June 9, 2016):

Further to your article today, here's the URL to a YouTube clip, of Mohammed Ali interviewed on the BBC … in which he makes a good argument for separation of the races = not "segregation", but natural self-selection / association of people with their own race

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqiWFLsgVi4

this is an excellent example of how different the media world, is, today, compared with how things were not all that long ago. Then, Mohammed Ali was allowed to express his point of view. Today, - someone in his position as a celebrity probably would be sensitive-enough to self-censor. Or, if he did say such things aloud, he'd be making a grovelling retraction within 48 hours


Andrew said (June 9, 2016):

A perfect demonstration of your thesis today, is the way news pundits and politicians are attacking Trump for bad-mouthing the San Diego La Raza Federal Judge. Seems Judge Gonzalo Curiel is not only of Mexican descent, but also associated with the La Raza Lawyers Association of San Diego. Cesar Chavez denounced La Raza in the 1970s as dangerously racist. In Spanish, La Raza means “the race.”

Besides, attacking judges is as American as apple pie, Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. FDR denounced judges when they ruled against him and announced plans to ‘pack’ (rig) the US Supreme Court in 1937. See Attacking Judges Is as American as Andrew Jackson … also The Donald & The La Raza Judge. So what is wrong with Trump saying the same thing as Jefferson, Jackson, FDR and Cesar Chavez?

The current attacks on Trump would make George Orwell blush. Historical facts don’t matter anymore.

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-04-01/attacking-judges-is-as-american-as-andrew-jackson

http://buchanan.org/blog/donald-la-raza-judge-125323


James C said (June 9, 2016):

In George Orwell's definition of Newspeak, a great many words meant the exact opposite of what they appeared to mean. For example, such words as joy camp (forced-labor camp) or Minipax (Ministry of Peace, i.e., Ministry of War). Even the party slogans reversed the meaning of words. For example, War is Peace, or Freedom is Slavery. The essence of psychological warfare is to confuse the meaning of words and to infiltrate the mind with conflicting concepts unawares. Similarly, the Talmud is one gigantic reversal of the Bible.


linux user said (August 27, 2014):

good start of a lexicon -- I was surprised not to find 3 important missing words in it:

A "conservative" is someone who furthers their agenda primarily by wanting war, war and more war and by disallowing dissent (e.g. George W. Bush). Someone who actually wants to conserve what is good and conserve resources is a crazy Nazi-sympathizing nutjob.

A "liberal" or "progressive" is someone who furthers their agenda by making it ok to murder the unborn while hitting hard on "hate speech" (as already defined) and who, while claiming to be peaceful and possibly preferring to support Ukraine-style "peaceful revolutions", doesn't rule out war, war and more war (e.g. Barack Obama). Someone who actually wants liberty or wants to make progress where it is needed is a crazy Communist nut.

A "Realist" is someone who may disagree with the "conservatives" and "liberals", but still does all he can to support one of those groups because they're the lesser evil.


Peter C said (August 26, 2014):

The average voter who helps elect those who don’t belong in a government by and for the people are already completely surrendered victims of the Illuminati language and habits and believers of the Big Lie. All this does is reinforce the “The Business as Usual” mode to preserve the Big Liars Club that supports the current front man who distracts us further with his lies and flap- ping his ears so we don’t notice the “ram up the butt” from this gangster. Aiding and abetting in these Enslave the People crimes is the mainstream media and its rotten “political correctness” to reinforce the lies.


Alan said (August 26, 2014):

As you know - less is more. I have not seen such a clear and concise article written with so few words that speaks VOLUMES of what you have been teaching your readers about the Illuminati Bankers.

They want to hijack our True God and the Torah Old Testament and substitute it with all the vile teachings in the Talmud.

Every one who has not yet woken up, just hears the repeated simple lies and accepts these carefully crafted words as truth and wants to obey the politically acceptable mantra.

Woe to us miss-fits who disobey! Well i'm in your camp and could not agree more with your simple message, the graphic's help a lot too.
Well done, this one will be a classic at some point in the future when the hundred monkey syndrome kicks in.


Doug P said (August 26, 2014):

This goes much deeper than what is suggested here Henry.

If people only knew what the word "attourney" meant, "represent"...the whole Legal system operates on words with double meanings, one meaning the common understanding and another the courts understanding. "Understanding" is a perfect example. "Legal" is another one. Speaking with a "forked tongue" is how its expressed.


Asim said (August 26, 2014):

I would add 'international community', cited whenever America goes to war and tries to imply that it is doing so with the backing of the' international community', when it is simply a nauseating euphemism for America, Britain and Israel.

Also, America's 'national interests', sorry but who's interests???? No, not the people of the nation state of America, but the global elite.

Pass me the bucket Henry!!!!


Peter N said (August 26, 2014):

How about substituting the words "Sickcare Management" for what is now called "Healthcare?"

The FDA was originally called the "Division of Chemistry" and then later renamed the "Bureau of Chemistry." Makes sense since it seems to me the real reason for this agency is to provide legislative muscle to the chemical companies, i.e. "Croney Capitalism."

Conventional farmers, via chemically supported ag schools and the USDA, have been taught to use chemicals to produce grains and vegetables resulting in nutritionally deficient plants more susceptible to pests which, of course, need to be controlled via pesticides made by those same companies. (The USDA has collected nutritional data for years which demonstrates the decline.)

Thus the population gets to eat nutrient deficient foods tainted with nerve agents which I believe contributes to ill health. So now the "healthcare" provider steps in to prescribe more of the same to "cure" the illness.

Personally I refuse to subscribe to this warped medical model designed to profit big pharma and insurance while doing little to provide true health to the "cattle." Now that more are waking up to this disaster, the government is trying to force the cattle to participate whether they want to or not; for the good of all because "everyone should have access to healthcare." Brilliant! Have the cattle pay for their death food!

"Slavery is Freedom."


Henrique said (August 26, 2014):

I consider the word "Illuminati" itself imprecise, corny and "Orwellian" - it's basically used by people who don't have the balls ( or don't want ) to attack Freemasonry, and esoterism in general - doesn't seem to be your case though.
Referring to Krister comment below, I think he has a point. The fairy tale of "Good vs. Evil" in WWII has more impact in today's culture and mindset than most people imagine - they ( the establishment ) need that fairy tale to mantain an "heroic" aura around armed forces all over the world and the modern version of imperialism alive, to spread "freedom and democracy" as we all know. This video is interesting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7vXKZciSok

Also an interesting figure is David Cole/Stein, who recently was outed and denounced for his "evil" past, and came out with a book: http://www.amazon.com/Republican-Party-Animal-Hollywoods-Underground/dp/1936239914

As the standard format, it's the same anti-denierophobic hater, same old, same old.


Robert M said (August 26, 2014):

What I like to call "Gobbledegook." Outstanding article. Yours continues to be the one of the hottest, most important websites on the Internet. Other political language examples? Hmm....I hate the way they use "mainstream." As if only adherents to the agenda have an enlightened outlook, and the majority of society has pretty much adopted it, because we're enlightened in this day and age. Only the backward and uneducated oppose it. Hence, "mainstream."


Krister said (August 26, 2014):

Using Illuminati (Jewish) propaganda-words as "anti-Semitic", "Holocaust", "Gas chambers", "extermination", "hate crime" and others, is in a similar way as 'doublespeach', very destructive for the Internet community and others trying to fight the Illuminati-Jewish hydra.

Very simply, as an example the false concept of "Holocaust" makes an aggressor into a victim, and giving anyone trying to fight Jewish or Zionist aggression, a intellectual 'prison ball chain' around the ankle. In a similar way, the word "anti-Semitic" uphold the lie of an ethnic(race) relation between the false Jews (Khazarians) and Palestine, and so handicapping any individual debating or active in resisting the racist terror entity of Israel.

So why is the activist or community trying to push back this hydra, still letting the hydra handicapping him or her, by using the propaganda-vocabulary of the aggressor? Isn't it time to use the full potential of debate, activity, protests and other measures, by breaking free from the leash of the hydra?

Also, we know that Jewish organisations controlling and driving the Holocaust-train, withhold, falsify or fabricate data or information, to give a false view that suite their agenda. In a similar way state archives in USA, Russia and Germany is doing the same. Therefore, as long as we haven't access to all the available data, and so in non-falsified form, we may also ask another question.

Doesn't the Jewish and other victims of decease and hunger in German work-camps, as well as the millions of victims in the Gulag-system and other labour-camps, deserve a more honorable way to uphold their memory, than accepting the lies and propaganda of the hydra behind their deaths.
--

Krister,

I regard both world wars, and most wars, as mainly goy genocides. But I do believe a lot of Jews were also murdered in WW2. I don't believe that the Nazis rounded up children, the aged and infirm in order to offer them free room and board. So I think the focus on holocaust denial actually does a disservice to the cause.

henry



Aisha said (August 25, 2014):

"We must reclaim language and use it expose them for whom they are, the real "haters" of God and man." Well-said! It's interesting, just today I was thinking of writing a piece on my new blog (http://miraatu.wordpress.com) about language, and how powerful it is and how our imprisonment in it is twisting our worldviews.

There are verses in the Quran that allude to this twisted Jewish habit of doublespeak, including the following (verse 2:104): "O you who believe! Say not (to the Messenger) Ra'ina (رَاعِنَا ) but say Unzurna (انظُرْنَا)... " The historical context and commentary of this verse is that Raa'ina was an Arabic word which means "hear us out", in a polite way that a person might ask someone to pay attention to them. However, it was a curse word in Hebrew, and so the Jews would use this in front of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), and the Arabs, not knowing Hebrew, and considering the Jews to be a learned people, starting using the word as well in front of the Prophet (peace be upon him), much to the glee of the Jews at that time.... continued


Aisha2 said (August 25, 2014):

Anyway, here are a few more words for your lexicon:

Minor-attracted people - upcoming euphemism for pedophiles (http://www.wnd.com/2011/08/336869/)

Settlers - instead of "Occupiers" - as used perpetually by Zionist media for illegal and very often violent Israeli take-overs of innocent Palestinians' homes.

Euthanasia - the murder of elders, plain and simple, another turning issue into a "debate". (Apparently this is accompanied by "assisted *suicide*"?)

Tolerance - this is used particularly against religion, to the extent that anyone who openly adheres to their religion is sometimes automatically considered "intolerant". In Muslim communities especially, I can tell you the insistence of "tolerance" is being used to brainwash people into thinking that if one does not adopt the rituals and celebrations and symbols of other religions - then this is some kind of "intolerance". When in fact, true tolerance is to respect the actions and faiths of others while *adhering to your own*! If you entirely *adapt* (read, "impersonate") another culture or people you aren't being "tolerant", you're merely giving up your identity and adopting theirs!

Moderate Muslims - this is a word to denote those Muslims who selectively pick and choose which part of the religion they want to follow, (sort of what I've heard are cafeteria Christians"). In the true sense of being Muslim, therefore, they are Muslims whose faith and/or actions are imperfect.

Fundamentalist - this is a word used to describe those Muslims who try to adhere to Islam more than moderate Muslims, to the extent that they dress according to the Islamic culture that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) brought about with his revolution. (i.e. veils, beards and turbans). These people may or may not adhere to any other practices, at ALL, but this outwardly expression of religiosity is enough for them to be labeled fundamentalists, and therefore clumped together with "extremists" and "terrorists".

Now what's interesting is that in *reality*, if we were to look at the dictionary definitions of the words "moderate" and "fundamental", then moderate Muslims are actually deficient Muslims who practice Islam selectively, and fundamentalist Muslims are more practicing Muslims, the ones who hang onto the fundamentals of the religion. Given that the fundamentals include justice, honesty, and such, this ought to have meant that fundamentalists are actually better than moderates.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at