April 2017 Archives

| 2 Comments

bar.jpg 

  Visit to a "Straight Bar" c. 2035


(Left. Old Point Bar, rumored to be a straight-hangout.) 


What if current trends continued, and 

heterosexuals were persecuted? 

A glimpse into our genderless future. 




George had a nagging desire to be embraced and kissed by a boy. She knew these feelings were wrong, and she always ignored them. She wasn����t ready to admit she was a heterosexual. 


by a Reader 

(Reprised and revised from Sept. 2011)

(henrymakow.com)


"Are you male or female?" Jamie asked George.

If this weren't the Old Point Bar, rumored to be a heterosexual hangout, Jamie  wouldn't have dared ask such a question.

Society had decided that gender was only a social construct. Love was based on common dedication to equality and diversity, not gender stereotypes and biological differences.

Even showing curiosity about someone's gender could land you in big trouble. The "sexual deviant" label could dog you for the rest of your life.

overalls.jpg"I'm a female." George replied. She was wearing the form-hiding coveralls most youths wore. Some of the females at the bar wore revealing, overtly-feminine clothes. They seemed so flirtatious... 

Jamie figured George was new to the underground straight scene.

"I'm a male," said Jamie. "I haven't seen you around here before..."


"Sandy brought me. She, I mean he, is my peer counselor at school."

Since the gender-revolution, all female pronouns had been eliminated. Everyone was a "he" and had male or gender-ambiguous names. 

"Sandy brought me here too. He has a good eye for heterosexuals. He's saved many souls from our genderless stereotypes."

As Jamie said it, he could tell George was becoming uncomfortable, even afraid.

Being at a straight bar was illegal, but raids were rare. Enough people in high places frequented such bars.

"Have you ever been to a wedding? There's going to be one later tonight in the back room."

terms to know.gif(Left. From a Minneapolis college dorm, c. 2013) 

"A wedding? What's so unusual about that?"

"This is a wedding wedding. Between a man and a woman in love, performed by a pastor. You know, the way they used to in the old days."

Most young people only knew modern weddings, where two or more people formalized their relationships by signing a co-habitation agreement. They preferred to share income and file joint tax returns. Most marriages lasted between one and five years, depending on the terms of the agreement. 


"Actually, I have to go... my mom will be back from work at 9 pm." George was curious, but she still had some values.

One thing to spend some time with heterosexuals, but another to witness one of their perverted anachronistic rituals. When she thought about the way they had sex, she blushed.  

George was in way over her head. She got up and left. 

As she opened the door, the cold air struck her like a slap in the face. Outside everything was normal again. She couldn't hear the music or the people inside. Everything was silent. 


"What was I thinking?"  She was always attracted to the stronger bigger kids who resembled boys. She had those nagging desires to be embraced and kissed by one of them. 
She knew these feelings were wrong, and she had always ignored them.

She wasn����t ready to admit she was a hetero. 

How did she go from talking to Sandy about her academic performance to actually going to a hetero bar??? 

Her mom would kill her if she knew!

Sandy hurried to her car and drove home at top speed. Mom hadn't arrived yet. She was safe... for now.

---------------

Dan recalls Star Trek episode - "Gender is offensive to my people." 


There was actually a Star Trek Next Generation episode about a planet with a genderless 'humanoid' species.  Imagine a planet where everyone is named "Pat" and they all look like lesbians made up to look like 14 year old boys.

Naturally, the Enterprise' token 'manly' man Commander Will Riker is aroused by this, when assigned to work closely with the planet's top pilot.  As usually happens on Star Trek different humanoid species are irresistibly sexually attracted to each other.

But 'love' against the law of the genderless species, and the fling between the two is discovered and the  transgender pilot is put on trial for "gender-specificity", the species'  lowest form of perversion.   Found guilty, the tranny pilot is sentenced to "conversion therapy" to erase opposite sex (and species?) attraction.   Riker and Worf return later to break the tranny out of therapy, but too late -- the tranny's already been reprogrammed, breaking Riker's heart by saying their affair was sick.   Worf takes Riker back to the ship for a cold shower.

The episode was intended placate LGBT groups that attacked Star Trek since the 'First' Generation for being too heterosexual.  Gay reviewers complained that the ending could be construed as 'pro-therapy'.   The metrosexual actor who played complained that the part of his genderless 'partner' should have been played by a teenage boy instead of a lesbian.

I've been expecting a wave of movie remakes, replacing the female characters with twinks.

I think the reason it hasn't happened is when they try it still comes off campy,  like community theater.  It's not easy, bucking the laws of Nature, even for Hollywood.



Why are Christians Such Wimps?

| 28 Comments
wimp-kid.jpg

 



from June 13, 2006

By Henry Makow Ph.D.


When an innocuous cartoon of the Prophet Mohamed was published, Muslims rioted and burned down embassies. But next week, a major Hollywood movie will challenge the veracity of Jesus Christ and Christians are sitting on their hands.

I have not read "The Da Vinci Code" but I understand it asserts that Christ married Mary Magdalene and had children. His descendants are still alive. Essentially it challenges the Bible story and the Christian belief that Christ was the Son of God. It transfers Christ's prestige to an Illuminati-like secret society that is protecting Christ's descendants against the Catholic Church.

The book and movie are yet another blasphemous assault on Christianity trumpeted by the full force of the Illuminati-owned mass media.

Recently Carolyn, a Christian reader from Maine, expressed her frustration in this email.

"Next week with 'the Da Vinci code,' "They" are going to call Jesus a liar as far as His Death and resurrection are concerned. Then they are going to claim his blue blood line. This would make Jesus a liar... wouldn't it? It is so twisted what they are selling and i count myself lucky to have a least read The Scriptures. 'My Feet Are Fitted With Readiness.' (Corinthians 6:15) What is going to be said about Jesus next week is apostasy."

I replied: "People like you should show their outrage publicly."

She replied: "HOW??? With Whom??? Where is the Remnant???"

I shrugged my shoulders. To change the metaphor, why are Christians such lambs? Why do they always need a shepherd to lead them and a flock to be part of? Isn't Christ a personal matter? Can't they act as individuals? Can't they take initiative? Organize a picket or protest in some other imaginative way? 

When Muslims in Afghanistan heard that the Koran was being flushed down the toilet in far away Guantonimino Bay, they rioted. For them the battle against Satan is very real, and they are willing to sacrifice their lives. This is why they pose the last remaining religious obstacle to the Satanic New World Order.

Similarly, question the veracity of the Holocaust, and Jews will cite "hate crimes" and put you in jail.

But do the same thing with the central fact of Christianity and there is a call for a boycott from the Catholic Church. Well, dah. That's not very scary.

Why are Christians such wimps? They sat idly by while Christ was crucified! Their reaction wasn't even a factor in that decision.

I have heard various explanations. Christ said, "Turn the other cheek" and "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's."

On the other hand, there is the example of Christ turning over the tables of the moneychangers in the temple. Let's follow Christ's example.

What good are Christian beliefs if you don't stand up for them? Where is the self-respect of Christians if they allow their beliefs to be trampled on?

But it gets worse. Some so-called Christians like George W. Bush are actually willing to serve Satan. Christian chaplains serve with the American army in Iraq and minister to soldiers. Everyone should know Sept. 11 was a hoax designed to justify imperialist wars and domestic repression. It was perpetrated by the Illuminati bankers in London with the help of their puppets in the US government. You just have to look at who bought the Put Options on the airline stock to know the true perpetrators. (Of course this info has been suppressed.)

Christians should file "hate crime" law suits against the makers of "The Da Vinci Code." It seems "tolerance" only applies to those who would destroy Christianity and family. On  Judgment Day we will be graded not by what we believed but by what we did. It's time Christians stood up for Christ.
---------

Related:  Jacob Rothschild marries a "descendant" of Jesus. "The Rothschilds and the Grail Bloodline" by David Livingstone.

Indian Muslim, Christian Groups Urge Ban

----

Mr. Makow,
 
My brother, who is a missionary in southern France sent me a link to your article entitled "Why Are Christians Such Wimps?".  In the article you said, "When Muslims in Afghanistan heard that the Koran was being flushed down the toilet in far away Guantanamo Bay, they rioted.  For them the battle against Satan is very real, and they are willing to sacrifice their lives."
 
I say the Muslims are foolish for how they reacted.  The Word of God teaches that "The wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God." (James 1:20)  and  "Cease from anger, and forsake wrath: fret not thyself in any wise to do evil." (Psalm 37:8)  There is such a thing as righteous indignation but rioting is not the answer.  "Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord."  (Hebrews 10:30)
 
Peter attempted to stick up for Jesus and was rebuked by Jesus.  The soldiers ear, which Peter had wacked off, was miraculously restored by Jesus.  "Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest's servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant's name was Malchus.  Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath:"  (John 18:10-11)   In another place the Scripture reads:  "...all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword."  (Matthew 26:52)
 
The Bible teaches Christians to, "Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good."  (Romans 12:21)
 
The battle isn't ours, it's the Lords.  "the LORD saveth not with sword and spear: for the battle is the Lord's"  (I Samuel 17:47)   "the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds"  (II Corinthians 10:4) 
 
You said,  "What good are Christian beliefs if you don't stand up for them?  Where is the self-respect of Christians if they allow themselves to be trampled on?"  Jesus said, "These things I command you, that ye love one another. If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.  If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.  But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me.  If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloak for their sin.  He that hateth me hateth my Father also."  (John 14:17-23)
 
Christians should take their stand for Christ by sharing Him with others.
Bruce Roberts
www.floridabruce.com
II Cor. 5:17

--

 

Man's Love Mirrors God's Love of Creation

| 6 Comments

marriage.jpeg"And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.
 And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters."
Genesis 1-2

Despite gender confusion, women are still looking for leaders, protectors and providers, so they can raise children. Only a satanically (Communist) subverted society would force women to concentrate on career
 during their most fertile years and import foreigners to augment the population. 

 "A man's most valuable asset is his wife."

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Why "Hell has no Wrath like a Woman Scorned'"
(Revised and Updated from May 22, 2013)


In a deceptive article, "Infantriarchy" on the anti-feminist website A Voice for Men,  Gordon Wadsworth argues that "equality and self actualization" will result from overcoming two basic "defects." He seems ignorant that these "defects" (reflecting a power imbalance) in fact define gender and are at the heart of heterosexuality.  


"The female defect is her desire to infantilize herself; to project a facade of weakness and victimhood. The female does this because part of her identity is contingent on compelling males to act on her behalf. This is a mechanism which allows the female to feel desirable, important, and powerful. ...Thus, the female defect keeps her from assuming personal responsibility, which presents a barrier to her self-actualization.

The male defect is his desire to compensate for the infantilized female. He does this because part of his identity is contingent on earning female validation. He thus demonstrates his ability to protect, provision and inform. This is a mechanism for feeling useful, powerful, knowledgeable, and important. The male defect leads him to compete with other males to demonstrate his primacy to females... This becomes his own barrier to self-actualization.

These defects mean that the female path of self-actualization is one of taking responsibility, and the male path of self-actualization is one of relinquishing responsibility."


Wadsworth thinks he is anti-feminist; but this is pure feminism - neutering the sexes by empowering women and enfeebling men and making them selfish. Wadsworth is providing a recipe for more gender neutering and confusion not "self actualization." 

Gender is based on an imbalance of worldly (physical, material) power between male and female. Just look at how much stronger males usually are. As I have said, heterosexuality requires the surrender of female material power to a select male (her husband) in exchange for his power, expressed as his love. This contract is consecrated by exclusive sex, marriage and family.  

Men want power; women want love. Marriage is the exchange of the two; i.e. Male love in exchange for Female power.

With "strong and independent" women, there is more temptation for men to evade their role, i.e. providing leadership. This is just what the Illuminati want. Instead, men need to return to the traditional model, where the male is the Captain of the ship, and the woman is the First Mate. This is what women still want: a man strong and worthy enough to earn her allegiance. No amount of feminist social engineering can overcome natural instincts. The captain mustn't abandon ship and become a metrosexual or hipster. 


MARRIAGE IS MYSTICAL

Marriage and family is a God-given path that allows us to find love and grow inwardly. Today, millions of people are in a state of arrested development because they cannot form a permanent relationship. 

Man represents the God Principle. Woman represents the Creation Principle. There is no war. 

Women seek male love like flowers crave sunshine. 

"Making love" is a physical expression of this mystical alchemy. The woman loves a man's spirit. The male prepares the woman and plants the seed. The seed is the spirit, code and spark of creation. The female accepts the spirit. But, by being possessed, she also possesses. 

Another metaphor is the relationship between a farmer and his land. The farmer cultivates the soil and plants the seed. The verb "husband" means to cultivate and manage prudently. The land gives birth to new life and nurtures it.


WOMEN EARN LOVE

Society has conditioned men to see women mostly in terms of sex appeal. 

Women are by nature passive and instrumental. They are helpers.  They want to be loved for the contribution they make, not for the size of their breasts. They earn a man's love by helping him achieve his goals.

A man needs to define his goals and give his wife a valued role. A wife is a man's most valuable asset.

A woman is a bridge to the future. When she gives birth, she transforms herself and her mate into their child. Through the child, they are recreating themselves and producing the future. Creation is in a constant process of transformation.

spurned.jpgIf a woman isn't chosen and used for a higher purpose, she never realizes herself and remains unfulfilled. If she is discarded after having sex, the sting is all the sharper. In her soul, the sex act is a living metaphor for the love of God. This may explain the elemental wrath of the scorned woman.

A woman's love is synonymous with trust, openness and acceptance. This is what a man most craves from a woman. He needs someone to nurture and believe in him. Her belief makes anything possible for him. Her faith provides the space that the male expands into. She is Creation.

A woman wants to be nurtured, used and shaped by a man's love, which is a surrogate for the Divine Spirit. I'm not saying all or most men are surrogates for God, but this is the ideal. When a woman loves a man, she accepts his leadership. She is content to be consulted and considered.

Men forget that the position of wife is a status to which all women aspire. Dating is an interview. Courtship is probation. Marriage is a Sacred Covenant. Women find their bliss in being intensely needed by her husband.


FIND A WOMAN WILLING TO BE YOUR FIRST MATE 


A single man should approach marriage with a clear sense of how he wants to live, where a woman fits, and what her job description is. Women do not respond to men who are starved for sex and love, and don't have a plan for her. Nor are they satisfied with men who want them to remain independent, two parallel rails that never meet.

In conclusion, Marxists, having failed to create a class war between capital and labor, created one between men and women. The aim is the same: power. They are creating conflict where none exists. They are trying to portray as a disease something that is in fact mystical and divine. They are presenting sick behavior as healthy. They are standing between millions of people and God.

Men represent the God-principle. Women the Creation-principle. Man and woman, God and Creation are in love with each other. They need each other for completion and self-transformation. The way to stop the spread of Marxist feminism is for men to start acting like men, so that once again women may trust and yield to them.

---

RELATED - Woman says Contraception Bad for Her

Makow - Relearning Heterosexual Love


First Comment from Tony B- 


domesticity.jpg

It is impossible for men to act like men in the present court system without being jailed or worse.

The cabal has gamed the courts so that men cannot be men when it comes to their women.  Women can stop any such action with a simple phone call to "authorities" and the man's life is over even before any court gets involved.  As a matter of fact, many women have foolishly done just that and then, regretting the result, have tried to have their complaint reversed or dropped only to discover they cannot because now the cabal has what it wants, the destruction of one more man.

If men were free to be men, brainwashed women would shape up in no time in order not to be thrown to the wolves over some stupid trivia of an overblown ego.  They would find themselves bereft of the home, kids and security they had been receiving without real appreciation or cooperation instead of court encouraged selfishly robbing a man of all he has provided.


Monthly Archives

Pages

  • about
Powered by Movable Type 5.2.13

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from April 2017 listed from newest to oldest.

March 2017 is the previous archive.

May 2017 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.