Mark said (April 10, 2011):

Regarding April 29th wedding date. Amazingly, what doesn't get much mention is that this is the date that Hitler and Eva Braun married. I doubt that it is completely coincidental.

Krister said (April 4, 2011):

An 6 part interview on YouTube by www.redicecreations.com of the author of the book "Hitler Was a British Agent", elaborates on how statesmen such as Hitler and others, are controlled by shame and blackmail (ie. sex deviation and serious crime as phedofilia and murder). The part of interest related to this article start in part 3, where the author Greg Hallett describes the 20 Century as a Rothschild family operation and thereafter describes how the English royalty is related to-, and controlled by, the nowdays notorious banking family. Later on in part 4 at 8 min. and in beginning of part 5, he further comment on the British Royal family.

Hitler Was a British Agent part 1 of 6:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&v=frf9GS0g9YM

Ken said (April 4, 2011):

nteresting observations concerning William and wedding/engagement rings. I would like to point out that not wearing these rings does not "[break] the rules of a Christian marriage ceremony" , according to Jesus Christ. There is nothing in His Word about His people using such things. The "Christians", as is too often the case, baptized and adopted a pagan practice and incorporated it into their own. After long usage, such "traditions" become thought of as 'Christian', when, in reality, they're nothing of the kind. Ingrained habits do not legitimize a thing if it's false to begin with--no matter how much time has passed.

As far as any intended message from "the powers that be" to the public, well, that could easily be true. The fact that rings are not actually Christian may not negate the potential desired effect of rejecting it, so long as the general public believes it is a real Christian institution.

SG said (April 4, 2011):

Soon after Diana's death, I saw a marked change in Prince William. He began life appearing like a sweet, warm and bright child. I recall he did not walk alongside his father at her funeral. He looked completely destroyed that day. Over the years since, his appearance became darker. One might imagine that his programming began in earnest at that point. I suppose they would not allow him to marry unless and until his possession was complete. The person posing for photos these days bears very little resemblance to the golden boy he once seemed to be.

Karin said (April 4, 2011):

I would like to make a comment about the emblem on prince William's uniform and I agree with the fellow talking about this mountain goat from the Kyper path area. In actuality it looks like an Antelope to me and being in the goat family has resemblance to Bephamot, but is not one and the same.

And who knows, maybe Kate will find a lovely, masculine ring she wishes to present him with perhaps at a later date at one of their anniversaries, and out of sheer love and respect for her he will choose to wear it just to please her.
Let's wait and see. It is my sincerest desire some place along the way William will show more of his mothers personality and character
and choose to follow truth, light, and life. For this to happen people all across the world would need to get in unity and pray for this young man to come out of darkness and onto the path of Righteousness ( or right living). He would then begin to encounter the same opposition and persecution his mother encountered. I identified with her pain and disappointment she initially experienced as was caused by this scumball Charles ( he is no prince in my book ), which left her no choice but to go on in life in her search for the inner peace, happiness, and fulfillment most young woman desire when they start a young family as she did.

Kate said (April 4, 2011):

GREAT ARTICLE! I'm so disappointed to find that Prince William has gone over to the dark side but I am not surprised.

I guess it was either that or die. There is no negotiating with these imposters impersonating humans.

Your readers who disagree are just too brainwashed by all the satanism worldwide to know the difference.

Thank you for having the courage to call things are they truly are! The more people wake up the more of a chance we have in saving mankind.

First step? Get rid of all the despotic satanic families who falsely believe they are "god" and therefore have the right to rule over the rest of mankind! Almighty God made each man and woman a sovereign citizen of the earth.

HE and HE ALONE is qualified to "rule" the earth. Anyone who says otherwise is either working for the Beast or is sadly deeply brainwashed by It.

Keep up the Good Work!!

Christine said (April 4, 2011):

Hi Henry,

Speaking of masochists, what about Kate Middleton, that poor girl who wants to marry a guy who refuses to wear a wedding ring? And is letting his family shun hers on holidays? Sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.

On the other hand, St. Thomas Aquinas said that the daughters of unchastity include selfishness, hatred of God, darkening of the intellect, and so on. Pehapd if Prince William and Kate led chaste lives, which they are not, they might use better judgement.

St. Edmund Campion said that England would become corrupt as a result of its rejection of the Catholic religion. The Saint was a friend of Queen Elizabeth I, who had him racked. Immediately after his famous remark, he was partially hanged, disemboweled, and hacked into 4 pieces.

His crime? Offering the Sacraments as a Catholic priest.

After seeing the Prince's refusal to wear the ring, and his spinelessly standing by to let his family mistreat hers, I can see that the Saint was right.

Anthony said (April 4, 2011):

I have to agree with James. Stefan Molynieuxon's essay "Is William's Wedding Ring Refusal Satanic?" reeks of ignorance. There are already many signs that point to future monarch's involvement in anti-Christian activity. The lack of a wedding ring is not one of them.

Many cultures... Jewish, Muslim, some Christian (Seventh-day Adventists) have traditions of bride and or groom not wearing wedding rings. A biblical study in jewelry shows that the giving of jewelry suggests ownership, i.e. an earring given to slaves (Ex.21:2-6, Deut.15:16-17). It can also symbolize a special provider/receiver relationship, i.e. the prodigal son's reward includes a ring (Luke 15:22). Christ gives a crown to those who look forward to his appearing (2 Tim 4:8).

Is it expected that a young woman is supposed to save for and produce a ring of gold for her husband on their wedding day? Or is the young man who already spent at least a month's salary for an engagement and wedding ring expected to spend another thousand or so for a ring for himself? The western tradition of men wearing wedding rings is less than one hundred and fifty years old, gaining influence in America following the world wars and perpetuated commercial enterprises like De Beers.

A man who refuses to wear a wedding ring can hardly be less of a family man than a man who does wear one, much less a satanist. Much more a man who gives his bride a ring and leaves his hand naked is a man who subscribes to a rich tradition of the provider/receiver relationship. In fact, some may view those men who do where wedding rings as uneducated and effeminized.

No, William's refusal to wear a ring is not a sign of satanic involvement. It distinguishes him from all the effeminized Christian men who would rather be "partners" with their wives then leaders and providers in their marriage.

--

Anthony,

Everything the Illuminutty do is symbolic. Every thing a future king does is symbolic. You are mistaken in this instance.

Henry

NEM said (April 4, 2011):

irst of all Henry I'm no fan of the Royal Family or the British establishment but I feel I must present a few facts in response to your article.

RAF 60 Squadron currently is a helicopter flying school. Prince William was wearing that uniform whilst training there. He is now a fully qualified search and rescue helicopter pilot, flying Sea King helicopters.

The emblem is a markhor's head a mountain goat and was approved by King George VI in December 1937 to commemorate years of service in North West India. The makhor is found there in the Khyber Pass. They are also said to have the ability to eat snakes!

Like I said I'm no lover of the Royal Family but sometimes I feel you go way over the top with your Satanist bloodline beliefs.

--

NEM

Yeah there always is an explanation for their satanic symbols, and there's always someone like you who provides it.

Like Egyptians, the Illuminati depend on 'da Nile."

henry

Jeb said (April 4, 2011):

HE IS NOT MATURE ENOUGH TO SETTLE DOWN
...the ring symbolizes castration to a playboy party sort...which he is and then some.

Their wedding 'bliss' won't last a year.

I don't see anything necessarily 'dark' about his hormone and identity issues.
He's just a punk who THINKS he wants to be married. Won't last...I guarantee it.

James said (April 3, 2011):

I just read your article on the fact that Prince William won't wear a wedding ring. I understand the point you're making in your article, but focusing on that point is well off the mark. There are many cultures that don't wear wedding rings. Practicing Muslims, for instance, don't wear wedding rings as it's not part of Muslim custom (from what I've read). Are you suggesting therefore that they too are Satanists? If so, you really are crossing a line here.

Isn't this article just another examples of you pouncing on something that catches your attention and crying 'Satanism!'? The fact that the Royal Wedding takes place amidst a whole range of Satanist holidays is an important topic in itself, and had you chosen to focus on that, your article would have been much more effective. As it is, pouncing on the absence of a wedding ring - which, let me repeat, isn't even acknowledged in several cultures - just makes you, and anyone else who makes an issue out of this, look very stupid and petty.

--

No James,

This is another example of your denial and complicity in our societal death wish.
Other cultures don't wear a ring? That's just the point. We're trying to preserve our own. He will be king! How do you explain the Baphomet on his uniform? Do other armies salute Satan as well?

Henry