Women Lack the Smarts to Lead
November 6, 2010
(left) Woman's chess champion, Alexandra Kosteniuk
[Editor's Note: I think the greater problem is not gender but the fact that our leaders, male or female, are chosen by the Illuminati bankers through campaign funding. Many of the most courageous and brilliant Patriot leaders were women: Nesta Webster, Edith Starr Miller, Elizabeth Dillling and Phyllis Schlafly come to mind. Although males and females have distinct traits, I judge people on their individual merits.]
by Anthony Migchels
Clear proof that males are intellectually dominant can be found in the chess world. I'm very familiar with that sport, having been an avid tournament player for years, president of one of Holland's leading chess clubs and member of the Board of the Dutch Chess Federation.
Chess is a clearly intellectual sport. It requires brainpower, energy and good health. A chess player can use as much energy during a 6 hour 'game' as a soccer player can use in a 90 minute match. However, no physical strength is required, so it is a very reasonable testing ground for intellectual prowess.
And the fact of the matter is: men totally dominate chess.
In chess strength is expressed in Elo rating. You gain Elo points when you win, you lose them when you lose.
The best chess player in the world at this point is Magnus Carlsen, who has an Elo rating of 2826. Elite players have an elo rating of 2700 plus.
The best female player in the world is Judith Polgar, who at this point has an elo rating of around 2680. She is the only female player in the Top 100. Her sister is Susan Polgar, who was at some point Woman World Champion. She never crossed the 2600 threshold though. In fact, besides Judith there is only one woman who ever (just) managed to get a 2600+ Elo rating.
But Judith is an anomaly, because she was raised by a Hungarian psychologist who published a book before she was born entitled 'How to create a Genius'. And that is what he set out to do. He succeeded with her, but he was unlucky to have only daughters. Had his son been Vishy Anand, Magnus Carlsen or Vladimir Kramnik, they would probably have ended up with a 3000 Elo rating.
Of course there are strong women and a strong woman will
beat a weak man. But a strong man will always beat every strong woman.
The few women that have the capacity and will to work at (near) top level should be able to do so. But the fact of the matter is, that very few women can really compete with men.
has its paradoxical ways of asymmetric justice. Yin and Yang are
opposing forces. Yin is the water that erodes the toughest rock. A
gentle woman's heart will melt a real man. A fierce, competitive woman
just invites him to use his superior power to put her back into her
place. Or worse, to ignore her.
give birth to men and women alike. They nurture their offspring,
literally. Women have been fooled into dismissing this invaluable
contribution. It is the strangest of things. It just shows the contempt of feminism for humanity.
and women have their role to play in this world. The way feminists try
to usurp the male role is pathetic. To have second-rate women lead first rate men is a disgrace and unacceptable to real
men. Which explains to a high extent the ever larger number of young men
dropping out of school, employment and society.
Anthony Migchel's real currencies blog can be found here.