Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below- Young Man is Saving Sex for Marriage (scroll down)

NSA - Political Blackmail Includes Everyone

August 22, 2014


snowden-recorded.jpg
Left, Edward Snowden: NSA " even keep track of who is having an affair or looking at pornography." 


"The ultimate goal of the NSA is total population control." - NSA Official

But who controls the NSA?  The Illuminati bankers. 

Just as the Illuminati control their own members through blackmail, as humanity is inducted into their cult (at the lowest level,) they control us in the same way.

The totalitarian template of the NWO is Cabalist Judaism, a satanic cult
on which the Illuminati is based. 









"To gain the same intimate detail for an entire country, the Stasi had to employ one police informer for every six East Germans...By contrast, the marriage of the NSA's technology to the Internet's data hubs now allows the agency's 37,000 employees a similarly close coverage of the entire globe with just one operative for every 200,000 people on the planet."





by "George Washington" 
For Zero hedge
(Abridged by henrymakow.com)



It is well-documented that governments use information to blackmail and control people. The Express reported last month: "British security services infiltrated and funded the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange in a covert operation to identify and possibly blackmail establishment figures, a Home Office whistleblower alleges."
 
A Whistleblower Mr X,  said  [the pedophile group] was being funded at the request of Special Branch which found it politically useful to identify people who were paedophiles...."

There is widespread speculation that Pope Benedict resigned because of sexual blackmail.

And the American government has a long history of blackmailing people - including high-level officials- with knowledge of their sexual peccadilloes....
FBI head Hoover was famous for blackmailing everyone ... including politicians.  The New York Times reports:

"J. Edgar Hoover compiled secret dossiers on the sexual peccadillos and private misbehavior of those he labeled as enemies -- really dangerous people like ... President John F. Kennedy, for example."

Upon taking office on Roosevelt's death in early 1945, Harry Truman soon learned the extraordinary extent of FBI surveillance. "We want no Gestapo or Secret Police," Truman wrote in his diary that May. "FBI is tending in that direction. They are dabbling in sex-life scandals and plain blackmail."
 
J. EDGAR HOOVER

After a quarter of a century of warrantless wiretaps, Hoover built up an archive of sexual preferences among America's powerful and used it to shape the direction of U.S. politics.  He distributed a dossier on Democratic presidential candidate Adlai Stevenson's alleged homosexuality to assure his defeat in the 1952 presidential elections, circulated audio tapes of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s philandering, and monitored President Kennedy's affair with mafia mistress Judith Exner. And these are just a small sampling of Hoover's uses of scandal to keep the Washington power elite under his influence.
 
071222_j_edgar_hoover.jpg"The moment [Hoover] would get something on a senator," recalled William Sullivan, the FBI's chief of domestic intelligence during the 1960s, "he'd send one of the errand boys up and advise the senator that 'we're in the course of an investigation, and we by chance happened to come up with this data on your daughter...' From that time on, the senator's right in his pocket." After his death, an official tally found Hoover had 883 such files on senators and 722 more on congressmen.
 
In the Obama years, the first signs have appeared that NSA surveillance will use the information gathered to traffic in scandal, much as Hoover's FBI once did. In September 2013, the New York Times reported that the NSA has, since 2010, applied sophisticated software to create "social network diagrams..., unlock as many secrets about individuals as possible..., and pick up sensitive information like regular calls to a psychiatrist's office, late-night messages to an extramarital partner."
 
The ACLU's Jameel Jaffer has warned that a president might "ask the NSA to use the fruits of surveillance to discredit a political opponent, journalist, or human rights activist. The NSA has used its power that way in the past and it would be naïve to think it couldn't use its power that way in the future." 

Even President Obama's recently convened executive review of the NSA admitted: "[I]n light of the lessons of our own history... at some point in the future, high-level government officials will decide that this massive database of extraordinarily sensitive private information is there for the plucking."
 
Indeed, whistleblower Edward Snowden has accused the NSA of actually conducting such surveillance.  In a December 2013 letter to the Brazilian people, he wrote, "They even keep track of who is having an affair or looking at pornography, in case they need to damage their target's reputation." If Snowden is right, then one key goal of NSA surveillance of world leaders is not U.S. national security but political blackmail -- as it has been since 1898.

Today, the NSA tracks people's porn-viewing habits in order to discredit activists.  The NSA also gathers and keeps nude and suggestive photos of people in order to blackmail them.

The Associated Press notes: "The stockpiling of sexually explicit images of ordinary people had uncomfortable echoes of George Orwell's "Nineteen Eighty-Four," where the authorities -- operating under the aegis of "Big Brother" -- fit homes with cameras to monitor the intimate details of people's home lives."
 
FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds alleged under oath that a recently-serving Democratic Congresswoman was secretly videotaped - for blackmail purposes  - during a lesbian affair. (Other Congress members have been blackmailed as well.)

Edmonds tells Washington's Blog that judges who are too "squeaky clean" are often not approved for nomination ... while ones with skeletons in their closets are. And she says that high-level FBI managers have publicly confirmed this blackmail process.

There have been allegations of blackmail of gay activities within the U.S. armed forces for years.

220px-William_Binney-IMG_9040.jpgAnd even the raw data on American citizens collected by the NSA is shared with Israel.  This likely includes Congress members and other politicians, as well. Bill Binney, left, the NSA's senior technical director turned whistleblower- told Washington's Blog t
hat the NSA's blackmail tactics are the same as those used by the KGB and Stasi:

Binney told the Guardian recently: "The ultimate goal of the NSA is total population control."

And Binney tells Washington's Blog that NSA surveillance allows the government to target:

"[CIA head] General Petraeus and General Allen and others like [New York State Attorney General] Elliot Spitzer"
"Supreme Court Judges, other judges, Senators, Representatives, law firms and lawyers, and just anybody you don't like ... reporters included."

NSA whistleblower Russell Tice (a key source in the 2005 New York Times report that blew the lid off the Bush administration's use of warrantless wiretapping), also says: "The NSA is spying on and blackmailing its overseers in Washington, as well as Supreme Court judges, generals and others. The agency started spying on Barack Obama when he was just a candidate for the Senate.

And senior NSA executive Thomas Drake explains to Washington's Blog that the NSA can use information gathered from mass surveillance to frame anyone it doesn't like.

-----------




You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2014/08/Political-Blackmail-Includes-Everyone .html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Below- "The Fosters" Brings Family Drama "Up to Date" (scroll down)

Young Man is Saving Sex for Marriage

August 21, 2014

housesold.jpg(Brian sees sex as part of marriage and procreation.)


"Gaming" young women and 
seeking sex for its own sake
strikes Brian as degrading 
and pointless. 








Brian is a 22-year-old postgraduate student who lives in Ireland. His interests include hiking, reading and "stemming the decline of Christian civilization."



"Whenever a man longs for anything beyond measure immediately he is disturbed within. The proud and the covetous are never at rest. The poor and the humble of spirit live in the fullness of peace." Thomas a Kempis, The Imitation of Christ



by Brian
(henrymakow.com) 

I have enjoyed reading articles in the so called "manosphere" for quite some time now. Many important topics are tackled in an objective and pragmatic way and it is refreshing to get away from the mush oozing from the liberal media. However, I cannot condone is the pickup culture, the "pump-and-dump," the spending of huge amounts of effort in order to engage in promiscuous sex where a woman is simply used in a selfish and hedonistic way. 

This behavior is so common and socially accepted that it is not even questioned anymore. I have met many good men whose main priority in life seems to be getting laid. They let their trousers do their thinking and are perfectly content doing it.

I know what many of you are thinking. It's the women's fault for becoming "liberated". They are getting exactly what they deserve. Yet I urge you all to reconsider. Many of these women are brainwashed by the decadent culture sold to them by MTV.

lesson.jpgThey are told 24/7 that the most important thing in life is their fun and told not to think of the consequences. In a way, they remind me of a child who continues to gorge on chocolate even though it will give him a tummy ache later. The child is too stupid to realize his pleasure now will cost him dearly in the future.

I see promiscuous women as fallen human beings who are on the ground rolling around in their own filth. If I was to "game" such a woman, using psychological techniques learned on the manosphere to take my pleasure only to avoid her after the deed, all I have done is kicked her when she is down and in most need of help. 

It is the ultimate act of hate. She is someone's daughter, sister, mother. She is also a child of God, however misguided. I am furious at feminists and what they have reduced the West to, but I will not be forced to play their sick game.  

By way of example, a  good friend of mine dated this girl once. He is an intelligent guy who looks after himself and she was absolutely smitten with him. I saw the way she looked at him, her eyes hopeful and full of love.

Yet from talking to him, I knew he did not take their relationship seriously. He had sex on tap for the price of having to spend a few hours with her every week. If he had the opportunity to sleep with other girls, he took it. On a human level, I felt sorry for her. Was it fair for him to use her to satisfy his libido?

man-mountain-solitude.jpgI therefore remain a celibate man. The next time I will be having sex is the night of my wedding. 

Do not get me wrong, I am not deprived of female attention. However, any girl who is not potential marriage material simply does not get the time of day as I refuse to waste my time.

Instead I focus on other aspects of my life. My legal career is progressing nicely. I devour volumes on history, philosophy and politics (which allow me to tear those liberals apart in debates). At the weekends I hike out in the wilderness. I have also taken my Catholicism more seriously. Celibacy is not too difficult, provided it is approached with the right attitude.

The only way to change a sick world is to change ourselves first. Jaded by years of feminist indoctrination, it is time to become human again. To conclude, I present another quote from The Imitation of Christ (which I sincerely urge every Christian to read):

"Therefore true peace of heart is found in resisting passions, not yielding to them. There is therefore no peace in the heart of a carnal man, nor in the man devoted to the things around him, but only in the fervent and the spiritual."


RELATED-

Makow - Managing the Male Sex Drive

First Comment from Victoria:

Excellent article from Brian and congratulations to him for being only 22 yet taking such a mature and compassionate view of things.

Speaking as one of the (formerly) rabid feminists who ignorantly helped to inflict that ideology on the world from the 1970's to the mid '90s, it is women such as myself who young men should be directing their anger towards and not young women, who are simply the result of 50 or more years of social brainwashing.

In my defense, I have to say that it was being the product of an unbalanced marriage, by having an incredibly angry, 'patriarchal' father who saw the women in his family as his 'chattel'; and, a passive - but resentful - mother who never contradicted anything he said or did. It was these conditions that drove me into the feminist camp when I went off to university.  And, like so many of us 'boomers',  who had fathers who had served in the military during WWII, the authoritarian structure of my family was not uncommon in those days.   So, men must take some of the responsibility for having created the fertile soil into which the seeds of that movement were planted.  And, it was their sons who 'benefited' by the more liberal attitude to sex that it brought about...

It is my great regret that I, and my (formerly) feminist peers are unable to pass on to young women the benefits of the painful lessons we have learned.  We, older women, are still seen as washed-up, over-the-hill, and irrelevant to most younger women.  I don't know from where Brian has acquired his wisdom but all credit to him for having done so.  Men are, and always will (I now believe) predominate in this world because of their greater physical power and energy, and if not allowed to do so in a positive, responsible, constructive way, will do so negatively.  By choosing the former rather than the latter path, Brian is setting an excellent example for other young men of his generation.  Good luck to him!






You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2014/08/Young-Man-Saving-Sex-for-Marriage .html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Young Man is Saving Sex for Marriage "

James N said (August 22, 2014):

Thanks for the article entitled "Young Man is Saving Sex for Marriage". When I was 17 I discovered Thomas a Kempis' "Imitation of
Christ" by chance in a hostel while on an A-level biology field-trip in the south of England in 1981. That second-hand book really helped
me, and I thank the person who put it in the library there. I can also advise anyone to read and meditate on the book - I would argue the
second most important Christian book, after the Gospels. It got me through university a virgin, and when I met my wife I knew that I had
saved myself for a good reason.

Keep up the good work, and my the Creator God bless you.


KLS said (August 22, 2014):

Is it not ironic that to understand the dynamics of masculinity, femininity and male / female relationships we have to go to that dark corner of the web known as the 'manosphere'.
All the books from the 'professors', and experts with university 'degrees', and all the books on piety tend to merely reinforce our brainwashing. And nothing on the manosphere is forcing us to abandon our own personal morality, whatever that may be.

Brian, you are legally trained. Please get back to us and explain just why you are prepared to enter that crazy corrosive and three sided contract known as 'marriage'.

"Whenever a man longs for anything beyond measure immediately he is disturbed within. The proud and the covetous are never at rest. The poor and the humble of spirit live in the fullness of peace." Thomas a Kempis, The Imitation of Christ -

No thanks. That sounds like a counsel of abasement, not fulfillment.

Here is an article (from the manosphere) discussing under what conditions a marriage might be successful and how much that differs from the usual modern form.

http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/08/04/the-working-womans-new-master/


Steven B said (August 21, 2014):

I'm a 26 y/o man who has felt depression and worthlessness many times over my lack of exploits with women. I got into the manosphere and found good explanations for the negative experiences with girls in my life and understood how I displayed weakness and desperation and killed attraction girls had for me.

I now understand how to pick up girls and have done it successfully with 'alpha' behaviors and attitude. This article is in line with how I feel about it. God's clear that fornication isn't what he made humans for. Racking up lays is a wasteful and destructive pastime.

I still get a bit down when I hear guys bragging about how they got laid recently, but that's b/c I have conditioning that sex and romance is life. It's hard to hope for a good marriage when many women behave like toys played with by a dozen or three other men. The primary thing I tend to get sad about is sex and romance, even with the world falling apart, my lack of a fit companion means more to me than having to contend with the soon coming full blown collapse.

Manosphere author RooshV wrote a post about "Man is wolf to man", a book about the Soviets. A man in that book was betrayed by his wife and denounced as counterrevolutionary. He lost his academic position and went to a prison camp. The man said his wife's betrayal hurt him more than all the beatings and deprivations.


Sandeep said (August 21, 2014):

Say hi to Brian from me. Lots of respect for being so young and having such great understanding. As to the gaming, I think gaming is somewhat of a bad word and can therefore seem degrading. I don't share all of what the manosphere sites say, but there are lots of concepts one can definitely use or at least consider when it comes to gaming articles. As for me, the gaming is definitely something I consider useful information.


JG said (August 21, 2014):

What a breath of fresh air this article is.
The happiest people in the world are those who divorce themselves from the fleshly passions of self gratification. Why? Because you are now a free man and no longer a captive slave to that which is of the flesh.

Ever since the fall of Adam and Eve man has taken on a psychotic type of image. He is of the spirit but in a corrupted fleshly body. This does not make man's "fallen" identity an easy thing to live with or overcome.

The spirit has trouble existing in a corrupted fleshly body. And, it can only dwell when the desires of the flesh have been "crucified".

God knew that we would have trouble overcoming this Adamic nature we inherited through the fall at the Garden of Eden so he sent us his only begotten Son, Jesus Christ, to save and redeem the human race. This is why he is also called "Son of Man".

Through the teachings and the inheritance of the nature of Jesus Christ we then can put Satan and his carnal desires behind us forever.


Below- ISIS are Sunni Impostors & Saudi-CIA Shills (scroll down)

"The Fosters" Brings Family Drama "Up to Date"

August 20, 2014


Fosters.jpg(left, The Fosters "family" consists of an inter-racial lesbian couple with children from different parents and races.)

Monkey See; Monkey Do. Two percent set the example for 98%

Somehow, I missed the massive popular outcry demanding that multi-racial homosexual "families" become the new societal norm.  Thankfully, Hollywood Jews (at ABC-Disney) and homosexuals have anticipated the need to help non-Jews and non-gays shed their racial and family identities. Thanks, Illuminati Jews!  Below, the lamestream media promotes the idea that the death of the nuclear family represents progress and "social change."

[Fosters Creator] "Peter Paige is proving that you can make a traditional family drama with a non-traditional family." 





Illuminati Jews and their Freemason lackeys have never met a society they didn't want to degrade and despoil. 





by Jaime Weinman
"The Fosters Revives an Ailing Television Genre" (Maclean's)
(henrymakow.com)
(Question marks in text are mine.)

When you describe The Fosters, it doesn't sound like the kind of TV drama that would catch on in this edgy age.

Peter+Paige+Bradley+Bredeweg+Family+Equality+ayT3hecBtVKl.jpg(Left, The Fosters creator Peter Paige, right, is a gay actor who starred in Showtimes' Queer as Folks for five years. He is pictured here with co-creator Brad Bredewig.)

It's the warmhearted story of a lesbian couple raising children from different parents and races, a companion piece to another ABC Family drama, Switched at Birth, the tale of two families who discover they've been raising each other's children.

"What's in vogue at this moment (?) is anti-heroes," says Peter Paige, who co-created The Fosters. His show, which wraps up its second season this month, isn't in that vogue: the parents are likeable people and so are their kids--even "bad girl" Callie (played by Maia Mitchell).

And yet both The Fosters and Switched at Birth have a following that most good-guy dramas don't get. The Fosters gets reviewed alongside Game of Thrones on sites like Vulture, and some critics feel it's edgier than the edgy shows. Manisha Aggarwal-Schifellite, arts editor for Shameless magazine, says The Fosters is willing "to deal with issues of racism, rape, sexual identity and addiction" in a way that cool anti-hero dramas won't.





IN THE "FAMILY DRAMA" TRADITION? -----------

walton'jpg(left, the Waltons, example of c. 1970 non-multiracial, non-lgbt family)

These shows belong to an old genre--family drama--that has produced many hits, from The Waltons in the 1970s to 7th Heaven in the 1990s and 2000s. In recent years, though, most networks have abandoned the genre in favour of more violent fare.

Paige recalls that when he and his writing partner, Bradley Bredeweg, came up with the idea, "there was one family drama on the air, Parenthood," based on the 1989 movie. Sitcoms like Modern Family were doing a better job of portraying the present-day functional family (?) than any drama on the air.

That made Paige and Bredeweg worry that no one would buy their show, but once ABC Family came calling, they realized it was an opportunity to bring the form up to date.

While anti-hero dramas like The Americans deconstruct the white nuclear family, The Fosters and Switched At Birth celebrate the changing definitions of a family. (?)

FAMILY AS SMORGASBORD

Sometimes they can barely keep up with the changes: the first season finale of The Fosters, in which the lead couple got married, was filmed only two days after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act.

Diversity is also a big part of the show: one parent is African-American and two of the adopted children are Latino.

Switched at Birth takes on class: the families are brought together by the mistake that mixed up their kids (one of whom is deaf), but they're separated by economic differences, a wealthy family co-existing uneasily with a poor one.

jpgDealing with big issues is part of the tradition of family dramas, as seen in the episodes about divorce and sex on the 1970s hit Family. This type of episode has become rarer (except on Degrassi) as writers fear being accused of getting preachy or sentimental. But though Paige says his writers "avoid finger-wagging," The Fosters is famous for its issue-oriented stories.

A recent episode had the mother, Lena (Sherri Saum), undergo a late-term abortion because her doctor told her she had pre-eclampsia. Another episode dealt with what Paige calls "statutory rape for boys," as characters discussed the implications of 16-year-old Brandon (David Lambert) having sex with his father's ex-girlfriend.

All this may broaden the viewer base. Other ABC Family dramas, like Pretty Little Liars and The Secret Life of the American Teenager, are teen shows. But John MacDonald, an executive for ABC Spark, which airs these shows in Canada, says the issues on The Fosters and Switched appeal to "the millennial audience we're targeting." Paige notes that "families with kids as young as 10 are watching the show and using it as a way to talk about some very difficult and complicated subjects."

None of this has impressed Emmy voters yet, though Paige is happy about the recognition from critics and advocacy groups. And he's also happy to be proving that you can make a traditional family drama with a non-traditional family.

"What percentage of the population is being raised by two moms in a multi-ethnic family? It's very small. But in telling something so specific, your stories still resonate universally."
--

Related - Makow - Television Ruined My Life
----------------------It's Ok to Say "That's So Gay"

First Comment by E

Once homosexists gain a penis hold, they bring in and surround themselves with like-minded appendages, thus forming a nucleus of power which they strive to capture and exercise control from the top down. Simply stated, homosexists are some of the most vicious bigots and cultural disassemblers one will ever come into contact with.

Like the hypocrites and predators they are, homosexists exploit the moral currency of victims of THEIR persecutions, like blacks and Jews for starters, to further their own interests. And the people are seduced through their own weaknesses into buying into this political perfidy. The Gay schematic of operation by-en-large is revealed in THE OVERHAULING OF STRAIGHT AMERICA By co-authors Marshall Kirk and Erastes Pill (Also known as Hunter Madsen). for additional Background see:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexual_Agenda
http://library.gayhomeland.org/0018/EN/EN_Overhauling_Straight.htm

Dan writes:

I want to say 'good for Eileen' (see comments)  for avoiding television.  I threw mine out in 2008, and since they've installed them in every public place they possibly can.
I have no plans to ever carry a 'mobile' internet or phone device. Only those who have gone for over a year without these inputs can really just how deadly the programming is. Not only for the mind, but for the soul.

Now, whenever I am exposed to television running in someone's house or in a restaurant, no matter what time of day, it's like sitting in front of a sewer pipe.  Now I can see the character of the people that are on television:  actors, celebrities, 'news' anchors, politicians, Televangelists... I see them all in their iniquity. Yes, I mean these aren't 'nice' people.

People with integrity don't get to be on television.  They can't let the public see that.  This is no recent development either.  All the way back to the early silent movie days of Hollywood they put the most corrupt men and women to play "good" people.

Those saturated in the daily TV habit accept these shows as real - the situations workable.  But they aren't reality.  TV and movies can make impossible situations seem commonplace.   I will never see this show, so I can only wonder what makes a "bad girl" bad on a show like this?  Is she 'homophobic'?

No - if an episode is about an abortion with amusing dialog then they're still using the ancient Hollywood cliché of making the "bad" character somehow the one all the pubescent girls want to be.






You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2014/08/Bringing-family-drama-up-to-date.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for ""The Fosters" Brings Family Drama "Up to Date""

Eileen said (August 20, 2014):

The Internet is equally pernicious for people, but obviously without counting sites like yours.
Anywhere you go on the internet, you can see gay ads, pictures, news, stories,etc.

Even when I close my e-mail I know yahoo will show me news about gay celebrities. Try to enter any online newspaper today, and type "gay" or "trans" in the search bar. You will surely find some news about it. Or before watching any youtube video, you also have ads or trailers for movies who show non-traditional families...

I have eliminated the tv from my room 4 years ago and it worked very well. Unfortunately my parents and brother still like television and have 4 more tv's in their bedrooms, kitchen and living room.
I would recommend people not using computers too, only for work if you need it.


Robert P said (August 20, 2014):

JG (below0 Is correct, judgement is coming to America.....
One Sunday morning in June, 1933, God gave seven major continuous visions to His prophet William Marrion Branham (Fulfilling Malachi 4:5 + Matthew 17:11 + Revelation 10:7 and other scriptures)

Five of the seven continuous visions, have already come to pass.

SEVENTH VISION.

“The last and seventh vision was wherein I heard a most terrible explosion. As I turned to look I saw nothing but debris, craters, and smoke all over the land of America.”

Judgement is coming to America, do you wonder why ?

[email protected]


JG said (August 20, 2014):

Henry, just talked to a young woman who is a parent in a lower middle class income neighborhood. She can't bring herself to feed her innocent daughter to the wolves in the public school system. She said kids are now having sex in grade school along with drug addiction.

I also heard from a young man who is going through recovery that he recently heard a testimony from a 10 year old black girl who was addicted to heroine.

I worry for America Henry, I hope I'm wrong but America could be ripe for judgment real soon.


Russian advisor part of the Charade?

August 20, 2014

Russian Advisor Part of The Charade?

This interview by Sergei Glaziev has received great interest. An adviser to Putin, Glaziev's message is that the current technological cycle is winding down, and that a new one is needed. He says Putin was trying to create an economic zone stretching from Portugal to Siberia and China. However the US wants to dominate Eurasia, and is sabotaging Putin using Ukraine as a linchpin. 

I stopped watching because, like Noam Chomsky, he acts as if the US is a sovereign nation rather than a sock puppet of the Illuminati Jewish bankers agenda of world domination. For this reason, I think he and Putin may be part of an Illuminati false dialectic, which in the end will advance the Illuminati agenda by fomenting a world war.  



Putting America Last by Philip Wyeth

August 6, 2014

obama-illegal-immigrants-610x400.jpgPutting America Last

by Philip Wyeth
 
This situation on our southern border has me asking myself, do our leaders have any remaining interest in or loyalty to America at all? How else to account for the slavish desire to accommodate a seemingly unlimited number of foreigners from Central America who are attempting to move into the United States without following the formal immigration procedures that people from Asia, Africa, and Europe must abide?
 
Our own people here at home are hurting right now. With no manufacturing base our economy and national purpose are like a rudderless ship yet instead of making a plan to get America spiritually and physically back on its feet, the politicians are fawning over a large potential new voter block to take under their wing. Last century our leaders inspired us with an optimistic vision of America to build dams and skyscrapers and bridges--today cynical politicians and their retinue of lobbyist barnacles see us only as serfs who need to be ruled and as sources of tax revenue for their pet projects and lavish lifestyles.
 
NEW BOARDERS CROSSING THE BORDER

 
The everyday dupe looks at the "crisis on the border" as a chance for us to show our compassion as the most generous nation in the world. He is oblivious to the implications of what anecdotes like one-third of births in an Ohio county being born to illegal immigrants means for the future of our country.
 
Furthermore, why not just let everybody in? What if a million children from China, Russia, or Saudi Arabia were at the border? What if the entire 77 million-strong population of the Congo had fled civil war and was knocking at our door? At what point does generosity give way to the psychotic exit of a people through its own cultural suicide?
 
And I say this as someone who lived in Los Angeles for a long time. Not only do I have sympathy for the experience of the "anchor babies" who I knew personally, I've conducted business with a man who snuck across the border back in the early 90s. Illegal immigration is a longstanding fact of life in Southern California, and anyone who sees the new strip malls popping up in the once dangerous black ghettos that Latinos have taken over can't help but acknowledge the improvement in these areas.
 
But no nation should be required to take in any number of foreign citizens for any number of heartrending reasons. It doesn't happen in Canada and it doesn't happen in Mexico, so why is it allowed to happen here? Is it simply demographics--white people aborting and "waiting" themselves out of existence? Black people aborting and gangbanging themselves into a bloody epitaph? The need not just for labor but new consumers to replace the dying out whites and blacks?
 
Have you noticed all the semantic games the media plays when referring to the people sneaking into the country? They employ a selective and suggestive application of descriptive terms as part of the agenda to shape public opinion. These Central Americans on the move are referred to very gently in context-neutral terms like "undocumented immigrants," "migrants' and "dreamers."

I say hell, why stop there? If calling someone an invader or illegal alien is considered offensive and judgmental, let's cast that treacherous journey across jungle and desert in a more heroic light. Not mere refugees, these brave people are adventurers...and pilgrims...or better yet, young explorers!!!  The merit badges and green cards are in the mail...

Related-
Obama's Cloward-Piven Strategy


 

Mourning

July 24, 2014

mourning.jpg
Mourning

--------------


Tragic

that a woman

capable of so much love

for a man

should lose him

in the senseless war

in Iraq