The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged

January 27, 2012

.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editor's Note: I present this introduction to Jim Stone's work for purposes of discussion. I am not in a position to say one way or another, and welcome feedback from my readership.  




by James Farganne
(henrymakow.com)

When we compare the January 17, 1995, 6.8-magnitude earthquake which devastated Kobe, Japan with Fukushima, the evidence does not stack up.

A quick Google Images search of Kobe reveals incredible destruction of buildings, bridges, elevated highways, and other infrastructure.

On March 11, 2011, the Fukushima quake, magnitude 9.0, struck about 70 km off the coast of Japan.

It sent a 30-meter tsunami crashing over perfectly undamaged houses, roads, and cars -- over a populace which had not been warned of the incoming tsunami, and were taken completely off-guard. Yet helicopters were waiting, and people all over Japan got to watch the tsunami roll in on live TV.

What on earth was going on? Ordinarily, the Japanese people are warned of tsunamis. Why weren't they warned? Why was there no structural damage, no reason for them to suspect that a tsunami was coming?

The quake must have seemed like nothing special to a nation of people who are used to quakes. In a video taken in one Tokyo newsroom during the Fukushima quake, staff were seen to continue typing at their computer stations, totally unfazed by it.

A 9.0-magnitude earthquake is more than 100 times stronger than a 6.8. A 9.0 should have devastated everything within a 1,000-km radius. There should have been widespread urban carnage, even worse than what Kobe suffered.

Yet the Fukushima quake of 3/11/11 did not cause a single structure to collapse.

But don't take my word for it. Go look up the helicopter footage on YouTube.  Look at the infrastructure the tsunami was crashing onto. Not the slightest bit of damage. Common sense is enough to make you wonder.

Jim Stone did more than wonder. He dug up and analyzed the Japanese seismograms. He proved there was no 9.0 quake, and no epicenter out at sea. Instead, there were three simultaneous quakes of much lesser magnitude, all of them inland.

The authorities lied about the 9.0 quake -- made it up out of whole cloth. An earthquake did not cause the tsunami. There must have been another cause.

Reactors Destroyed by Nukes

It turns out that the official explanation for the Fukushima reactor explosions was bogus as well. Nuclear power containment walls are extremely thick and strong. Hydrogen explosions could never have destroyed them. As a historical reference, hydrogen explosions occurred at Three Mile Island and caused no structural damage, nor even any injuries to plant personnel.

Furthermore, Reactor Four contained no fuel on 3/11/11, and was therefore nonoperational -- yet it exploded and was destroyed as completely as were the other reactors that day. Reactor Four is like Building 7 at the World Trade Center - an utter impossibility, a blatant smoking gun. A reactor containing no fuel cannot operate; a nonoperational reactor cannot explode unless someone explodes it. The destruction of Reactor Four can only have been the result of sabotage.

Israeli Involvement

In February 2010, Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran. Soon thereafter, an Israeli firm by the name of Magna BSP secured a contract to run security at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. They installed oversized cameras strongly resembling gun-type nuclear weapons. There is strong evidence that they planted Stuxnet, an Israeli computer virus that attacks Siemens power plant control systems, and which Israel previously used to damage Iran's nuclear program. Magna BSP also established internet data links in the reactor cores, in blatant violation of international nuclear regulations.

All twelve members of that security team returned to Israel in the week before 3/11/11. In the aftermath of the disaster, the Israelis publicly monitored the reactor cores via their illegal internet data links. Yet no one took them to task for this.

Jim Stone Targeted for Revealing Truth

What caused the tsunami? What destroyed the reactors?

Using skills honed as a former NSA analyst with an engineering background, Jim Stone concluded that Israel was behind the destruction of Fukushima Daiichi. Now he is paying the price.

Stone proved that there was no 9.0-magnitude quake to cause the tsunami. The tsunami must have been artificially induced, perhaps by an atomic bomb placed in the Japan Trench.

The tsunami was blamed for flooding the reactors and causing the explosions. But Stone presents compelling evidence that Israel destroyed the Fukushima Daiichi plant by installing gun-type nuclear weapons in the guise of security cameras, and then setting them off in the tsunami's aftermath.

Stone demonstrates that the Stuxnet virus continues to distort sensor readings at the disaster site to this day.

Unlike many others in the world of whistle blowers, Stone bases his conclusions on hard evidence and unassailable logic. Anyone can review and challenge his work. He is open to it.

Since releasing his report and making several radio appearances to support it, Jim Stone has been harassed, threatened, unlawfully detained, and is currently facing prison time on completely trumped-up charges.

I have watched the reaction to his work on the net. Some have slandered him. Others have railroaded his work.

No one has debunked him yet.

His conclusions have ramifications that make 9/11 pale in significance.

Why, all across the alternative media, this roaring silence on the work of Jim Stone?

Why haven't more truth sites simply linked to his report, directing people to review the evidence and decide for themselves?

Some have expressed suspicion that Stone might not be what he claims to be. That's irrelevant. Facts are facts. The report stands on facts.

If you haven't done so yet, I urge you to study Jim Stone's Fukushima report. It is well worth the considerable time and effort. Then, if you agree that his conclusions are correct, please do your part in spreading this information and dispelling the alternative media's silence on it.

To conclude, a 9.0-magnitude earthquake never happened in Japan on 3/11; the tsunami must have been artificially induced. Nor did hydrogen explosions obliterate containment walls of concrete and rebar several feet thick. The official story is impossible. Israel was punishing Japan, and Zionist operatives now are attempting to destroy Jim Stone, the man who exposed the truth.

--

The original report: www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima1.html

Interview with visuals: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1G9QlynPBcQ

 

Philo: "Every Good Man is Free"

January 26, 2012

"You can't feel good without being good."  We spend our loves trying to skirt this truth.

Philo of Alexandria, a contemporary of Christ, reminds us that freedom is a spiritual state. A reader, Al Thompson, reviews Philo's inspiring essay, "Every Good Man is Free."  









by Al Thompson
(henrymakow.com)

"....Every wicked man is a slave, and that proposition I fully established by many natural and unquestionable arguments;"   "......we will proceed to show that every virtuous man is free."

     Anyone who offends God in any way is indeed a slave.  He is in bondage to Satan or evil and there is no way a man can please God while breaking any of His commandments. 

Philo (20 BCE - 50 CE), known also as Philo of Alexandria  was a Hellenistic Jewish Biblical philosopher born in Alexandria.  His work was important for several Christian Church Fathers but has been ignored by Judaism.


"...God is my ruler, and no mortal man....."
"For, in real truth, that man alone is free who has God for his leader;..."
 
     Ultimately, this is the only viable condition for any man, woman, or child.  Because man-made laws are too inconsistent, too capricious, and too convoluted to be of any practical use. 

God's natural laws are very easy to understand because they are self-evident.  By taking other men out of the equation, the true relationship between God and man is direct and profound.  There is no middleman because it isn't needed. 

The goal should be the acquisition of virtue and good character.  These things can be acquired by keeping within the natural law of God's creation.  And that is all for which most people are responsible.  We don't need any religious nonsense to satisfy God.  What we need is to build good character within ourselves in order to defeat the evil.  Evil is weak and ineffective, and there is no good thing that can come from it.  And people who are engaged in evil are then slaves to it.  There's a reason why it is called bondage.

"But the virtuous man has absolutely no obstacle at all since he rises up against, and resists, and overthrows, and tramples on fear, and cowardice, and pain, and all things of that kind, as if they were rivals defeated by him in the public games.  For he has learned to disregard all the commands which those most unlawful masters of the soul seek to impose upon him."

Notice the use of the words "unlawful masters."  Can we not apply them to our religious and political leaders?  All politicians and religious leaders I am aware of are chronic liars and only use God's laws if it suits their agenda. 

"But the virtuous man does do everything wisely; therefore he alone is free.  And indeed the man whom it is not possible either to compel to do anything, or to prevent from doing anything, cannot possibly be a slave; and one cannot compel or prevent the virtuous man."

This is a very important point.  A wise man cannot be compelled to do anything that he doesn't want to do.  A virtuous man cannot be corrupted.  And I think that if more men and women made it a point to avoid their evil inclinations it would make their lives--and those around them-- a lot more pleasant.

No matter what the situation, the virtuous man will always have the upper hand in everything because he is setting his foundation upon natural law that is in turn established by the God who created us.

"..Slavery, then, is of two kinds; slavery of the soul and slavery of the body.  Now, of our bodies, men are masters; but over our souls, wickedness and the passions have the dominion.  And we may speak of freedom in the same manner.  For one kind of freedom gives fearlessness of body in respect of any dangers which can come upon it from men of still more powerful body; while the other produces peace to the mind, by putting a check upon the authority of the passions."

Evil and passions have a way of putting us into a type of stupor where we do evil things and can't seem to control it.  By exercising a little self-control, any man can separate himself from evil and build up his character by obeying God's commandments.   

Religions seem to blur the common sense that God established under natural law.  When I conduct my behavior in line with God's commandments, I seem to have  more inner peace and I don't have a lot of bad things happening to me. 

As I look back on my life,  bad things happened due to my disobedience to God's law.  Having said that, I am not a religious man, and I don't practice any religious rituals because they always have the potential to lead me into idolatry.

 I just leave all religious rituals alone as they are too dangerous to use.  I don't go to any churches or religious functions  because there is simply too much idolatry. 

Goodness and virtue are things that every man, woman, or child should be pursuing rather than digging themselves deeper and deeper into the hole of evil. 

In addition, there is no sense in studying evil people and evil events.  They are what they are and it is destructive to the mind to keep studying things that are stupid; nothing smart comes from it. 

Sure, you need to know the basics, but after that, there's no sense in viewing it over and over again.  Keeping the mind continually focused on the goal of becoming a good man or woman should be of the highest priority.

---

An unabridged version of this article can be found here.

A copy of  Every Good Man is Free click here.


Walter Allen Thompson is the author of Grace of Repentance: Keeping God's Commandments and is a former businessman, income tax activist, who has recently spent over 5 years at a federally-funded sabbatical in a gated community. His website is http://www.graceofrepentance.com

Edith Starr Miller - Murdered for Exposing Conspiracy

January 25, 2012

(LEFT, MILLER, WITH DAUGHTER)

Occult and New Age web sites label Edith Starr Miller as an "anti Semitic, pro-fascist, Christian fundamentalist, who believes in the Jesuit-Jewish-Masonic-Illuminati-Bolshevik conspiracy theory."

This is how Satanists classify the vestiges of decent humanity who turn over the rock and describe the insect life beneath. This is one of thousands of stories of valor that Illuminati Hollywood will never tell.




(originally posted Feb 20, 2010)

By Richard Evans

(for henrymakow.com)

"Let me tell every woman, however much " protected", whether Dairymaid or Duchess, that the safeguards which she imagines to be thrown around herself are but a mirage of the past. Her own and her children's future are at the mercy of those  [occult] forces."

 --Edith Starr Miller

(Lady Queenborough)

Not long after Edith Starr Miller wrote these words in her book Occult Theocracy, she died suddenly in Paris Jan. 16th, 1933 at the age of 45. She had been in good health . Even the Grand Lodge of Canada records that she died "under suspicious circumstances". All records have been lost.

No newspaper article or obituary was published; no record of a coroner's report remains. Details of her life have been expunged, save for a New York Times clipping announcing her wedding in 1921.

Her death took place a year after filing for divorce Jan 8th, 1932 citing "cruelty."  Her husband was Almeric High Paget, 72, 1st Baron of Queenborough, Union Party MP, House of Lords, Knight of the Order of the British Empire, Treasurer of the League of Nations, and member of British Union of Fascists.

Shortly before her death, she had completed her anthology of occult secret societies entitled "Occult Theocracy" and hired a printer in Paris to publish it. In the Preface, she wrote:

"In offering this book to the public, I have endeavored to expose some of the means and methods used by a secret world, one might almost say an underworld, to penetrate, dominate and destroy not only the so-called upper classes, but also the better portion of all classes."

Edith Miller was never a member of the secret societies. As she wrote, she became aware of them because she'd married into the very Capstone of the British Occult Theocracy.

Is she the "victim" to whom she refers in this passage?

"Irrefutable evidence of a particular example of underworld tyranny has come into my possession. The victim's guilt was her reluctance to step from virtue into the mire of evil which surrounded her. Moreover she was intolerant of evil and sought to oppose and destroy it. The case of her persecution at the hands of her foes is complete. She belonged to what is termed Society as did also some of the other actors in this bewildering drama."

Occult and New Age sites label Edith Starr Miller as an anti Semitic, pro-fascist, Christian fundamentalist, who believes in the "Jesuit-Jewish-Masonic-Illuminati-Bolshevik conspiracy theory."

This is how Satanists classify the vestiges of decent humanity who resist them. This is one of thousands of stories of valor that Illuminati Holly wood will never tell.

LINEAGE

To understand her innocence of her position in elite society, think of Diana Spencer, Princess Diana. She was a brood mare with the right bloodlines.

Edith was born on July 16, 1887 in Newport, Rhode Island, the daughter of William Starr Miller ( Oct. 26, 1856 - Sept. 14, 1935 ) and Edith Caroline Warren ( April 15, 1866 - May 17, 1944.) Her father William was a New York industrialist and real estate developer.

On a balmy summer afternoon in 1921,  her wedding took place at her parent's Manhattan home on 5th Avenue, described as a 'simple ceremony' in The New York Times. Miss Miller's pedigree was top of the mark on the East Coast Anglo Establishment social registry.

Her grandfather had founded the New York Metropolitan Opera. In that world bloodlines determine marriages.

Edith's cousin, Pauline Whitney was the daughter of William C. Whitney - an initiate of Yale Skull and Bones and partner with Lord Greenborough in Dominion Coal, Dominion Iron and Steel, and Broadway Railroad Company. These companies contributed to securing the oil distribution monopoly which forced competitors to surrender to John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil domination of the petroleum industry by 1900.

This writer also traced the names of Edith's relatives to the Whitneys, and her middle name, Starr, is associated with founders of the OSS (later CIA), and the former international financial giant AIG.

Both of Baron Queenborough's wives were 33 years old when he married them. Each gave him two daughters, no sons.  Thus the Baron Queenborough title is extinct.

OCCULT THEOCRACY

"The power of theocrasy or exercise of government rule over the masses by a hierarchy of priests or adepts rested on its dual system of teaching, namely : Exoterism and Esoterism, the former a code of discipline of the thought and mode of life of the masses; the latter the hierarchic school wherein were trained the chosen adepts destined to safeguard the rules imposed upon the people by the high priests," she wrote.

Her aim "is to follow the outgrowth of Esoterism and a few of its multiple ramifications in the realm of perversion and subversion."

According to Miller,  Pharisee Judaism is not a religion at all, but a secret society posing as a religion, a "sect with Judaism as a rite." She cites Moses Mendelssohn who wrote "Judaism is not a religion but a Law religionized."
 
In a secret society, only the adepts know the real purpose. The rank and file is manipulated with warm platitudes and lies. The "innocent" who is unfit to know the "ugly truth" becomes a valiant defender of the faith and ideal recruiter. This also applies to Freemasonry which seems to be modeled on Judaism. Both secret societies advocate killing any member who reveals its secrets.
 
The real purpose of Judaism and all secret societies, Miller says, is to advance the agenda of the super rich.
 
"Regardless of their exoteric objects, the esoteric aims of most societies are all directed toward the same end, namely: the concentration of political, economic and intellectual power into the hands of a small group of individuals, each of whom controls a branch of the International life, material and spiritual, of the world today." (Occult Theocracy, p.661)
 
Western society, perhaps the whole world, is based on the secret society model. You cannot rise unless you are favored (or deemed useful) by the Illuminati, the highest rung of Freemasonry. The masses are the rank and file, lied to and manipulated.

In other words, mankind has been possessed by a satanic cult, and is organized along the lines of a satanic secret society.
 
Miller cites an expert on Judaism Flavien Brenier who compares the goals of Judaism with Freemasonry: Securing political power and gradually modifying "the conceptions of the people in the direction of their secret doctrine." (80)
 

This process of occult indoctrination is continuing by virtue of their control of the mass media and education systems.

CONCLUSION

Miller clearly understood the tempo of our times. She wrote in 1932:

"Today, most of the good people are afraid to be good. They strive to be broadminded and tolerant ! It is fashionable to be tolerant -- but mostly tolerant of evil -- and this new code has reached the proportions of demanding intolerance of good."

Edith Starr Miller is an inspiration for those who wish to uphold the highest values of humanity against a tidal wave of corruption.

--------------------------------

Links

Available on Internet Archive .pdf free http://www.archive.org/details/OccultTheocracy 

British Union of Fascists http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Union_of_Fascists

Princess Diana 1995 Panorama Interview:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8763652369740344477#

January 21, 2012

My Morning in Female Court


A reader feels a gender bias against men in an increasingly female-dominated judiciary. Of course, he is delusional since only women, homosexuals, select minorities and Jews can be discriminated against, and he is none of these.  











by Daniel
(henrymakow.com)

Today I spent my morning sitting in a court room patiently waiting my turn to plead not guilty and present my evidence in a case of speeding and photo radar.

The Judge was stuffy and fierce, she almost seemed to be aging at an accelerated pace.

The crown prosecutor was young and slender, just the right amount of curves in the right places... O.k. she was hot! There !.

I had the luxury of sitting through the entire mornings proceedings and getting to hear all the cases and arguments before me.  Most of these were half-assed pleas for mercy to avoid shelling out a few bucks and hey why not?

A few of the defendant's didn't  have a clue what was up or down; no case no arguments prepared. Even the cops in the back row were chuckling to themselves.

Watching the judge through all the proceedings, she seemed dead and lifeless but actively engaged in taking notes.

The crown prosecutor was a little more lively I think I almost caught her smiling a few times!

Now, I actually had a case based on solid facts, nothing to do with my opinion.

I finally get my turn to present my case and defend myself. I constructed my defense based on a portion their own evidence. I used the photographs, reported speed, lapsed time stamp and measurement of the vehicle to prove the car was actually going much slower then reported.

I made very nice diagrams and a written explanation for the Judge. The case I thought was nearly bullet proof but she made no attempt to look at any of the contrary evidence. The cute little crown attorney came at me with the speed of a viper (I must be onto something here I thought)

"ARE YOU A MATHEMATICIAN!!" she barked, "Did you make those calculations yourself?"

 Yes I replied, here is a copy for you. She went on to tell me that I am not qualified to do that. She never looked at the evidence nor did the judge. She just grimaced at me the whole time and I didn't see her making any notes. I was quickly found guilty.

Now can anyone please correct me but I thought the court house is a place where the judge carefully reviews facts and evidence?

Did I think too much? Maybe that combined with my gender intimidated them?

-
I have since spoken to the guy who runs www.wiseupwinnipeg.com and he has informed me that what I thought was "court" really isn't. My case was heard by a magistrate. They make you think its court. He went on to tell me that at that level you could have the most iron clad defense and they'll still convict you: "its almost criminal" in his words.

I was also informed that my defense has been used before and its nearly indisputable; you just don't hear about it in the media. He was kind enough to provide me with all the details on how to appeal and have it heard by an actual judge.

January 18, 2012

50,000 Feminists Take Umbrage at Pink Legos


You'd think feminists would want to encourage Lego's pitch to young girls.
Building blocks rely on spatial skills normally found in males.









by Jon Harrison
(henrymakow.com)

I'm a little bit conflicted on this, because I know stirring controversy is exactly what they want to draw attention to their "cause". This sort of thing should probably just be ignored, but they've gotten on a nationally syndicated radio show. The presentation was particularly objectionable. It was taken for granted that  feminist theory is proven and academically sound.

A consumer product targeted at children is so unsafe and dangerous  that an organized campaign to have it be banned from the marketplace had arisen with growing support.

What was it this time? Tainted Chinese baby formula. Choking hazard happy meal toys? Collapsible asphyxiation strollers? According to the presenter, this was a far more sinister menace.

Pink Legos. The snappable building block toy enjoyed by generations of children.  So what's the big deal? As it turns out, when viewed through feminist prism lenses any girl who is exposed to (let alone plays with) this toy will become a wife and mother, someone who is feminine and forfeits  her chance to be a brain surgeon or win a Nobel prize in astrophysics.

Lest you think this is a hoax, the original petition (with 47,000+ signatures & counting) can be found at "Tell Lego to Stop Selling Out Girls."

All interested parties who want to support women's right to choose the color of her daughters Lego's are invited to sign my counter-petition.

You'd think feminists would want to encourage Lego's pitch to young girls.
Building blocks rely on spatial skills normally found in males. Oops, have I just committed a sexist "gender stereotype"? 

January 10, 2012

Israel is Named after Satanist's Son

Barry Chamish's book (left) documents how the Illuminati (Zionism and Communism) both originate in a 17th century Satanic Jewish cult.



by Clifford Shack
(henrymakow.com)

The State of Israel, the military outpost created by the satanic Shabbatean-Frankist Rothschilds, was named after their great-great-great grandfather, Israel who happened to be the first-born son of Shabbatai Tzvi (1616-1676.)

They were able to get away with this naming for obvious reasons. Now, Israel ben Shabbatai was named after the grandson of the patriarch Abraham so...it should still have some meaning to y'all nevertheless,right? How do I know this you may ask? It becomes obvious when you realize that Shabbatean-Frankists are not Jewish.

For goodness sake, they pulled off the Holocaust! Understanding this, and knowing that Shabbatai Tzvi's son, ground-zero of the Shabbatean-Frankist breeding program, was named Israel...and that from him came the illustrious Rothschild clan...it's simple math.

Still don't buy it? look at my article about the second President of the state of Israel, from 1952-1963, Yitzak Ben Zvi. It's called "Father of the State of Israel."

http://cliffordshack-article-archive-storage.blogspot.com/2012/01/for-whom-is-state-of-israel-named.html

Are the Illuminati a Sabbatean Frankist breeding Program?

--

John comments:

Henry, the write up by Clifford Shack concerning the name 'Israel' is deceitful and outrageous.The name 'Israel' was given by Yahweh after fighting with Jacob all night.

Josh comments:

Israel is the name Jacob received in the Bible.  Hence his sons, the 12 tribes, were referred to as Israel. While you may or may not believe the Bible story,  it is completely moronic to suggest that the country was named after some 'satanist jew' named Israel (a somewhat popular name for Jews prior to the formation of a modern country by that name).

Max Comments:

Surely, the other commentators are correct that Israel (Ysra'el in Hebrew) is the name given to Jacob because he actually had "striven with God" as indicated by its literal meaning.

However, this word may also have ambiguity and I think that Clifford Shack has perhaps drawn our attention to its "occult meaning" that most people are unaware of: "Israel" can also be a "blended" word from IS(is) - RA - EL(lil) containing the names of three pagan gods/goddesses.  Isis is the Egyptian throne goddess; Ra is the Egyptian sun god; and Ellil (also referred to as Enril in the Sumerian-Babylonian time) is the Akkadian god of earth and wind.

Isn't that quite the Rothschild's way of deception?  No wonder why Satanists like twisted words.