Below- Charles Darwin - Stock Picker (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Man & Woman mirror God & Creation

May 22, 2013

"And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.
And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters." Genesis 1-2

Ideally, man represents God's Will ("form.") Women represent His Creation.
Despite gender confusion, women are still looking for leaders, protectors and providers, so they can raise their children themselves. Traditional gender roles give our lives meaning. That's why they are under attack.

by Henry Makow Ph.D.
Why "Hell has no Wrath like a Woman Scorned'"
(Revised and Updated from 2002)

In a deceptive article, "Infantriarchy", currently lauded as "brilliant" on the anti-feminist website A Voice for Men, Gordon Wadsworth argues that "equality and self actualization" will result from overcoming two basic "defects." He seems ignorant that these "defects" in fact define gender and are at the heart of heterosexuality.

"The female defect is her desire to infantilize herself; to project a facade of weakness and victimhood. The female does this because part of her identity is contingent on compelling males to act on her behalf. This is a mechanism which allows the female to feel desirable, important, and powerful. ...Thus, the female defect keeps her from assuming personal responsibility, which presents a barrier to her self-actualization.

The male defect is his desire to compensate for the infantilized female. He does this because part of his identity is contingent on earning female validation. He thus demonstrates his ability to protect, provision and inform. This is a mechanism for feeling useful, powerful, knowledgeable, and important. The male defect leads him to compete with other males to demonstrate his primacy to females... This becomes his own barrier to self-actualization.

These defects mean that the female path of self-actualization is one of taking responsibility, and the male path of self-actualization is one of relinquishing responsibility."

Wadsworth thinks he is anti-feminist; but this is pure feminism - neutering the sexes by empowering women and enfeebling men.

Wadsworth is providing a recipe for more gender neutering and confusion not "self actualization." Gender is based on an imbalance of worldly ((physical, material) power between male and female. Just look at how much stronger males usually are. As I have said, heterosexuality requires the surrender of female material power to a select male (husband) in exchange for his power, expressed as his love. This exclusive contract is consecrated by exclusive sex, marriage and family.

Men want power; women want love. Marriage is the exchange of the two; i.e. Male love in exchange for Female power.

With "strong and independent" women, there is more temptation for men to evade their role, i.e. providing leadership. This is just what the Illuminati want. Instead, men need to return to the traditional model, where the male is the Captain of the ship, and the woman is the First Mate. This is what women still want: a man strong and worthy enough to earn her allegiance. No amount of feminist social engineering can overcome natural instincts, as long as Captains don't abandon ship.

MARRIAGE IS MYSTICAL

Marriage and family is a God-given path that allows us to find love and grow inwardly. Today, millions of people are in a state of arrested development because they cannot form a permanent relationship.

Man represents the God Principle. Woman represents the Creation Principle. There is no war. Man and woman are in love. God is in love with Creation and vice-versa.

"Making love" is a physical expression of this mystical alchemy. It illustrates how each Principle works. The Male Principle penetrates, possesses and plants the seed. The seed is the spirit, code and spark of creation.

The female yields, opens and accepts the spirit. But, by being possessed, she also possesses. Look at the imagery. The penis is totally engulfed by the vagina. The man belongs to the woman who belongs to him.

Another metaphor is the relationship between a farmer and his land. The farmer cultivates the soil and plants the seed. The verb "husband" means to cultivate and manage prudently. The land gives birth to new life and nurtures it.

Femininity is by nature passive and instrumental. Woman is a bridge to the future. She is a medium. When she is fertilized, grows large, and gives birth, she transforms herself and her mate into their child. Through the child, they are recreating themselves and producing the future. Creation is in a constant process of transformation.

If a woman isn't chosen and used for a higher purpose, she never realizes herself and remains unfulfilled. If she is discarded after having sex, the sting is all the sharper. In her soul, the sex act is a living metaphor for the love of God. This may explain the elemental wrath of the scorned woman.

Love in a woman is synonymous with trust, openness and acceptance. Indeed, this is exactly what a man most craves from a woman. He needs someone to believe in him. Her belief makes anything possible for him. Her faith provides the space that the male expands into. She is Creation.

A woman wants to be nurtured, used and shaped by a man's love, which is a surrogate for the divine spirit. I'm not saying all or most men are surrogates for God, but this is the ideal. When a woman loves a man, she accepts his leadership. She is content to be consulted and considered.

Men forget that the position of wife is a status to which all women aspire. Dating is an interview. Courtship is probation. Marriage is a Sacred Covenant. Women find their bliss in being intensely needed by her husband.

FIND A WOMAN WILLING TO BE YOUR FIRST MATE

A single man should approach marriage with a clear sense of how he wants to live, where a woman fits, and what her job description is. This is what women actually want and what they respond to. They do not respond to men who are starved for sex and love, and don't have a plan for her. Nor are they satisfied with men who want them to remain independent, two parallel rails that never meet.

In conclusion, Marxists, having failed to create a class war between capital and labor, created one between men and women. The aim is the same: power. They are creating conflict where none exists. They are trying to portray as a disease something that is in fact mystical and divine. They are presenting sick behavior as healthy. They are standing between millions of people and God.

Men represent the God-principle. Women the Creation-principle. Man and woman, God and Creation are in love with each other. They need each other for completion and self-transformation. The way to stop the spread of Marxist feminism is for men to start acting like men, so that once again women may trust and yield to them.

---

Makow - Relearning Heterosexual Love

You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/220801.html

Articles >>

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for " Man & Woman mirror God & Creation "

JV said (May 23, 2013):

This is a great succinct article on the matter, and yes, many 'men's' sites still buy into the feminist frame/ mold.

One thing I would add here is my belief that the effects of modern warfare have , had, twisted men's souls to such a degree that with inevitable PTS (only the moral ones get PTS), these traumatized former men, now confused and emotionally laden and unpredictable 'men' , trying to go from the unspeakable insanity of war to the humdrum responsible sanity of peace, these damaged men, with young daughters witnessing such men as 'examples of the gender', feminist ideology made a lot of sense to them witnessing a generation of damaged 'male role models', damaged by industrial war.

One cannot separate the 'war crimes' against the psychologies of one's own troops from the 'rise of feminism'.
Damaged men do not good fathers or husbands make, for 'the school of murder' has been their most compelling education. note how these 'honour our troops' leaders throw them into the trash can of homelessness as soon as they are no longer of use. Then only their 'families', their women, are left to 'deal with the mess'. Feminism came out of this cooking pot created by 'the Masters of War' Dylan described.

Naomie's 'Shock Doctrine' relates to inter-personal relations in families, as well as intra-country dynamics. This quote speaks to how the 'international elite' succeed by war as a pre-condition for the rest of the ill they intend:

"As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless." :
U.S. President Abraham Lincoln, Nov. 21, 1864 - (letter to Col. William F. Elkins) - Ref: The Lincoln Encyclopedia, Archer H. Shaw (Macmillan, 1950, NY)

Annette said (May 23, 2013):

Bravo on your article, Man Woman Mirror.
I don’t know if there was a forum for rebuttal to that retarded article but if so, your article needs to be posted. You are on the money.

I never wanted to be subservient to my husband, I wanted to walk hand in hand with him as an equal. But that walking hand in hand requires respect for each other’s roles.

YOU ARE ABSOLUTLEY RIGHT, without the support of a strong male there is no way for a woman to take care of and nurture her children as they need to be nurtured. Studies have already shown children dumped at day care have lower IQ’s and are emotionally and psychologically underdeveloped as compared to those children being cared for by their own mothers.

I’m so tired of it all the propaganda, but what is more disheartening is seeing how the younger ones have bought all the lies, and are living and defending them. A voice in the wilderness you are. Thank you for that voice.

Dan said (May 22, 2013):

The "Infantriarchy" article opens with an appeal to a false analogy, "If our species were observed by an alien race...". Wordsworth never gave a reason why "our species" has these 'defects'. Instead, he gives a motive: "her identity is contingent on compelling males to act on her behalf." C'mon Gordon, how do you know that?
He doesn't say. He just whips out one logical fallacy after another in what appears to be a vitriolic cliché filled internet rant.

Volumes were written over centuries regarding the 'fairer sex' when it was well understood that women were physically dependent upon men before machines replaced the need for constant physical labor to survive. That's easy for us to forget in today's world, in which everything is done with the flip of switch.

JG said (May 22, 2013):

Beautiful article here Henry, good work! The Anti-God Marxists who are the authors of this "feminist movement" have successfully perverted the identity of the woman from innocence and submission to defiance and dominance. This was successfully achieved when they made females competitive with males in the workplace. When a man can no longer protect and provide for his wife his marriage is dissolved.

Once the roles of male and female are reversed in the marriage is when all hell breaks loose in the family unit. So many homosexuals grew up with mothers who dominated their fathers, thereby creating an atmosphere of love and sympathy for the male and not the female. This nightmare did not happen by "chance", but by Satanic "design".

Below- "Queer As Folk" show Made Me Nauseous (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Charles Darwin - Stock Picker

May 21, 2013

Darwin found that the human ape will accept a bribe to betray his fellow apes.
His belief in the "survival of the fittest" was wholly based on self-observation,
and was aptly named "Darwinism."

"So, we're to believe that Darwin, after studying bird eggs all morning, would lie on the sofa, browse the Times financial section, and say, "I think I shall invest in this one." And somehow he picked only winners. "

The intellectuals of the goyim will puff themselves up with their knowledge and without any logical verification of them will put into effect all the information available from science, which our agentur specialists have cunningly pieced together for the purpose of educating their minds in the direction we want. Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism . . . . (Protocols 2:2-3)

by James Perloff
Excerpt from "Truth is a Lonely Warrior" (2013)
(henrymakow.com)

As the author of two books exposing Darwinism's myths, I was stunned by this reference [in the "notorious forgery" - The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.]

I understood Darwinism's relationship to atheism and social destruction, having witnessed it firsthand in the 1960s. But how did the Czar's police make that link? And if their goal was to persecute Jews, why bring Charles Darwin into the picture? - he wasn't, to my knowledge, a significant figure in 1900 Russia.

Furthermore, the statement about "arranging the successes of Darwinism" intrigued me, because Darwin lived as a gentleman on a huge estate with up to eight servants. Yet he received no wages from employment, and earned only about 10,000 pounds from his books during his lifetime. Darwin did receive an inheritance from his father, but not enough to maintain such a grand standard of living.

Very few books have discussed Darwin's finances, and only one did in detail: Darwin Revalued (1955) by Sir Arthur Keith. This rare book disclosed that Darwin made a fortune through investments. Reviewing Darwin's ledgers, Keith reported: "I note that in some of his earlier dealings there were small losses, but in all his later investments there were only gains, some of them on quite a big scale."

(left, Darwin puppet)

Only gains? Even Warren Buffett will tell you he's occasionally made a bad investment. But not Darwin. To what may we attribute this success? Here's how Keith chose to explain it:

"The more we come to know of the man Charles Darwin, the more the wonder grows that he could carry on so many diverse activities. We have been accustomed to think of him as a naturalist brooding over the problem of life in plants, in animals, and in humanity at large, but now we find a man leading a secluded life near a remote village in the country and carrying on a successful business as a financier. No doubt The Times helped him; after lunch was the occasion given to it. His biographer tells us: 'After his lunch, he read the newspaper, lying on a sofa in the drawing-room. I think the paper was the only unscientific matter which he read to himself.'

Thus we may infer that, after assimilating day by day the trend of affairs in the news columns, he did not forget to look at any movements in the stocks which interested him. He had his stock-broker on the Exchange and his lawyer in London to do business for him."

So we're to believe that Darwin, after studying bird eggs all morning, would lie on the sofa, browse the Times financial section, and say, "I think I shall invest in this one." And somehow he picked only winners. Also, at 22, Darwin's eldest son William was made a partner in the prestigious Southampton and Hampshire Bank, though neither he nor the Darwin family had any background in banking.

Could Darwin's triumphant investing have resulted, not from fortuitous newspaper picks, but careful guidance by financial powers? Might this also explain his son's good fortune in landing a bank partnership? I can't prove it, but as a creationist I don't put much stock in "chance."

PROTOCOLS OF ZION: PURE EVIL AND NO "FORGERY"

But to return to the Protocols. I had never read a message so evil. They are often called a "clumsy forgery," but I was personally struck by how they laid out, in sophisticated detail, the very plan for global conquest unfolding today, which Truth Is a Lonely Warrior describes, including: world government; banking; the use of socialism, communism, revolution and Masonry; the attempted destruction of Christianity; and establishment of the Antichrist on his throne.

Let's take examples from the Protocols. By the way, selective quotations can easily distort a book. I want to stress that I haven't strained to find a handful of quotes supporting the thesis that the Protocols might be true, while eliminating quotes contradicting that thesis. I encourage you to read the entire Protocols for yourself. Regarding world government they state, for example:

By all these means, we shall so wear down the "goyim" that they will be compelled to offer us international power of a nature that by its position will enable us without any violence gradually to absorb all the state forces of the world and to form a super-government. (Protocol 5:11)

We will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international super-government, and with submissiveness. (Protocol 9:4)

[Continues]

---

James Perloff is author of The Shadows of Power, Tornado in a Junkyard, and The Case against Darwin. The above passage is an excerpt from Chapter 18 of his new book Truth Is a Lonely Warrior, a comprehensive look at the satanic drive for world government. Currently available only in Kindle format. While not insisting that the Protocols are fully authentic, Mr. Perloff, who is of Jewish ancestry, finds that that they approximate reality too closely to dismiss, and that the claim that they are a hoax is based on a combination of logic and evidence that is less than compelling.

Related- Darwin Illuminati Shill

Makow Note: James' book "The Shadows of Power" was the first conspiracy book I read when trying to make sense of the world, and it opened many doors!
--
First Comment from Eliezer:

The emergence of the Protocols coincides roughly with the founding of the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776. As the late William Cooper explains in Behold A Pale Horse, The Protocols are not a "Jewish" document, but an accurate account reflecting the attitude, methods & intentions of the Illuminati or "illuminated" ones. The "illumination" of a people undermines their enlightenment & destroys their vision. Thus, the art or craft of packaging darkness & death in an external "illumination, as opposed to an internal enlightenment." This occultic mechanism causes a people to embrace their own destroyer(s), especially if they're "animals."

Immanuel Velikovsky, author of several books offering a radically different account of the history of our world, including World's In Collision, Earth In Upheaval & Ages In Chaos, as well as the recently published 2010 Mankind In Amnesia, writes this about Darwin's engineering of "scientific" pretext for his survival of the fittest -- "The plot now being settled, the drama of everyone against everybody (an economy of mutual predation rather than affirmation) else could go on without any fear that the stage itself would collapse. For man at the top of the ladder it was like a license to devour or exploit the less developed -- soul or no soul; for man, this battle of survival in the animal kingdom is usually no more than sport. In any case, what all this did was quickly to bestow a century-long enduring victory of (applied anti-social) Darwinism over man's hidden apprehension as a descendent of survivors of catastrophes of unfathomable destructive power."

For this feeling of security in a gradual evolutionary process (verses a frequent & punctuated catastrophe, like Pompeii for instance) & what Velikovsky describes as "the peaceful history of our planet -- man was ready to part with the idea of his uniqueness and agree[d] to be counted as one of the animal kingdom." So, writes Velikovsky, "man was offered an opportunity to barter his godlike origin for the security (and apparent relative permanence) of his abode. Darwin, infers Velikovsky, "knew the sacrifice (in intangibles, soul, higher faculties, meaning & purpose etc) he asked and the guarantee of peace of mind he offered." Paradoxically, for man the instinctual animal to have a "peace of mind" however, seems an obvious oxymoron.

So, the result of Darwin's efforts were, as Velikovsky explains, "[W]hen Darwin destroyed the sense of absolute separateness of man & animal, he undermined belief in the soul's being separate (and immortal) from the surviving body (Oops! no more "world to come"). Thus, Darwin deflated man's pride (& stature) in his (Divine) origin and (his, man's) uniqueness." Indeed, a true & far reaching psyop if there ever was one.

You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2013/05/charles-darwin-stock-picker.html

Articles >>

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Charles Darwin - Stock Picker "

John said (May 22, 2013):

Charles Darwin was a member of the rentier class. He inherited wealth from his father as did his wife who inherited wealth as a member of the Wedgwood family. His investments included farms and investment in stocks, particularly the new railways being constructed at the time.
He was never very wealthy but through shrewd investment was able to fund his life of scientific research and his family's comfortable lifestyle. This is all well documented in Adrian Desmond and James Moore's definitive biography.

Doug said (May 22, 2013):

The Protocols of Zion is incredibly accurate - it will send chills down your spine. If freedom ever wins I'm sure it will be on every newsstand as a matter of history and required reading for every high school student. That and The Report From Iron Mountain are both must reads.

Its funny, but Darwin wasn't really a Darwinist in our sense. Marx was quoted as saying "I am not a Marxist".

Conroy said (May 22, 2013):

Darwin's trip and work in 1831 was in response to Humboldt's earlier 5 year scientific trip 1799 to 1804 which did not produce the demeaning evolutionary concept reducing man from the image of god to evolving from ape.This was the British and European hierarchy battle against the end of the dark ages , serfdom, Renaissance, nation state, republic classical music, industrial revolution etc uplifting the masses against the wishes of the ruling class. This battle has continued with rock and roll, drugs, communism etc leading to globalism, end of nation states.

See Humboldt's Book,"Cosmos" withdrawn from academia, which would refute Darwin at-
http://www.amazon.com/Humboldts-Cosmos-Gerard-Helferich/dp/1592401066/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1369203852&sr=1-2&keywords=cosmos+humboldt

Tony B said (May 22, 2013):

I find it odd that this writer, who seems to have researched Darwin, does not mention, at least in this excerpt, that the whole family group - including Darwin's father and earlier - were well connected, high masons.

CC said (May 21, 2013):

To Leland, below, the one who commented earlier with the phrase "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny",

If you will just do a simple Google search of Recapitulation Theory, you will see that this theory has been largely discredited by the Biological sciences for many years now.
Are you still willing to wager the future of your soul on some pseudo science from the 19th century?

Look it up yourself. Knowledge is power. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recapitulation_theory

Leland said (May 21, 2013):

as regards evolution v. creationism
I have three words for you
which I was taught in 1966
in 11th grade biology:
"Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny".
It is observable and reality-based.
I really don't wish to burn in Hell for Eternity
and the religion of my parents growingly haunts me
but given the choice between Genesis Chapter I
or any other well-intentioned "creation myth"
versus what is observable via the Satan-spawned
microscope... I'm going with my "lying eyes".
may Universe be good to you.

Thanks Leland,

The point of Darwinism was to make man a monkey and evict God from the universe. Our bodies can still be products of evolution while our souls are Divine.

henry

JG said (May 21, 2013):

Darwin was a NWO schill for the propagation of atheism. Scopes, who was an ACLU agent, was sent down to Tennessee to peddle Darwin's theory of evolution in the public schools. And yes, they literally made a "federal case" of it known as the Scopes Trial. The case which was tried by ACLU lawyer Clarence Darrow was designed to put God on trial in his own backyard of the "Bible Belt". This was all well choreographed in the movie "Inherit the Wind".

The great William Jennings Bryant defended the scriptures and Christianity won that battle. Unfortunately, years later, the ACLU won the war of removing God from the American Public Schools and the rest is history. Today, a large part of "Christian America", in the administrative sector, has become complicit with it's persecutors.

William said (May 21, 2013):

The author of DiVinci Code, Dan Brown, also experienced 'extreme success' making him worth over $100m with just a few books. Scores of other popular authors who out-sold Dan Brown in books and movie scripts don't come close to his wealth. This is a set-up to contribute to his 'authenticity'.

Below- The Conceit that FDR Was Not a Communist (like Obama) (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

"Queer As Folk" show Made Me Nauseous

May 20, 2013

(left. Queer as Folk was a Showcase TV series that ran from 2000-2005 and portrayed the lives of five gay friends living in Pittsburgh. PA.)

The showtime series "Queer as Folk" was part of the Illuminati (Satanist) program to replace heterosexual institutions (marriage, family) with homosexuality and perversion. This is done to destabilize society as children need to be born & raised in a wholesome environment. Our contributor Sasha Spencer checked the TV show out (of the library) and was appalled. Here is her review.

WHILE CHRISTIANITY UPHOLDS THE HIGHEST IN MAN, HIS DIVINE SPIRIT, LUCIFERIANS WORSHIP THE LOWEST, WHILE PRETENDING IT IS THE HIGHEST

"One of the men being banged from behind is Brian's mother's ( a staunch Christian) minister. Later in the show, Brian confronts the minister for being a hypocrite and the minister's reply was, "I only teach love". Brian's response is, "I've had the minister down on all 4's squealing like a pig, taking it up the ass"."

By Sasha Spencer
(henrymakow.com)

     Browsing for DVD'S at the library, I came upon the series, "Queer as Folk". Queer as Folk was produced for Showtime Entertainment, developed and written by Ron Cowen and Daniel Lipman. Originally based on a British series, the show was the first hour-long drama on American television to portray the lives of gay men and women.

The American version quickly became the number one show on the Showtime roster. The series was targeted at gay males but, surprisingly a large segment of viewers were straight females. (Trying to understand, like me?). The series was groundbreaking in being the first American series to show anal sex scenes, masturbation and shaved full frontal naked males.

The series follows the lives of five gay men, Brian, Justin, Michael, Emmett and Ted; a lesbian couple, Lindsay and Melanie; along with Michael's mother Debbie, (played by Sharon Gless), and his uncle Vic, who has AIDS.

To give you an idea of what you are in for, the opening musical theme is called "Spunk" by Greek Buck.

Let me state for the record, I am not against gays in any way, shape or form. I have family and loved ones who are gay. With that said, these are my impressions.

Queer as Folk is very explicit. It was a bit shocking to see men having very perspicuous anal sex constantly. The bath house scenes were raw and urgent. The men were predatory and hovering. It reminded me of the time I visited Christopher Street in NYC with a gay friend. Trying to be invisible, I observed the behavior of gay men in various bars. The intense drive, compulsion and desperation for sex could be cut with a knife. It was very disturbing.

After my initial nausea at the extremely graphic sex scenes, I began to feel numb. Three DVD'S in, it wasn't so shocking to see men taking it up the ass or rimming each other [licking ass]. And isn't numbness exactly what the Illuminati controllers want us to feel? Men trolling for anonymous sex with men in a predatory fashion, living for sex and the next big conquest -- no big deal, it's normal.

I DON'T NEED AN EXCUSE TO F*CK

I found the series to be depraved and immoral. Everything seemed to be focused on the male organ. The bathhouse scenes had copious amounts of anal sex, group sex and loud orgasms, leaving little to the imagination. Why does this bother me so much?   It must be the promiscuous, self-indulgent loveless lifestyles. Watching this made me feel empty.

An opening scene starts out with Brian and Justin (a couple) having extremely vigorous anal sex with two other men from behind and kissing each other while doing it. This was their DATE NIGHT! As it turns out, one of the men being banged from behind is Brian's mother's ( a staunch Christian) minister. Later in the show, Brian confronts the minister for being a hypocrite and the minister's reply was, "I only teach love". Brian's response is, "I've had the minister down on all 4's squealing like a pig, taking it up the ass".

This series tries to make the constant obsession with sex seem normal. It's the right of every gay to act in this depraved way. It's OK to f*ck guys constantly and the more the better.    Everything revolves around boners, dicks, f**ING, scoring...Ugh! If you want to see plenty of anal sex and erections, this show is for you.

eGUzMGtmMTI=_o_queer-as-folk-season-2-promo-video-clip.jpg

eGUzMGtmMTI=_o_queer-as-folk-season-2-promo-video-clip.jpg

(As usual, lesbian appearance is not portrayed realistically.)

In contrast, the lesbians, Lindsay and Melanie shadow the gay men. The sex scenes between them are not as offensive because they are more gentle and loving. Brutishness is absent in their sex scenes, however their morality is also in question as they cheat on each other and have a threesome. Lindsay has a baby with Brian's sperm and Melanie with Michael's seed. It's all so confusing.

In the fifth season, the premise is that the boys have become men. Hardly.
Michael loves comic books and sleeps on Captain Astro sheets. Brian, having a testicle removed has to haunt the bath house to prove to himself his masculinity is not diminished and he is still "hot" and ever so desirable.

Other questionable themes are the relationship of Brian and Justin, beginning when Justin was just 17 and Brian 29. This show pushes the boundaries. Seventeen is almost 18 so it's not really pedophilia. Controversial story lines in the series include: drug use/abuse, gay adoption, artificial insemination, underage prostitution, (Michael and Ben adopt a teen gay hustler who is HIV positive), drag queens, (Michael's biological dad is a drag queen), internet porn and bug chasers...HIV-negative individuals who actively seek to become HIV-positive...why?

I'M A TOTAL HETEROPHOBE (Brian Kinney)

IN CONCLUSION, this series left me feeling completely upside down. There was little I could relate to from my world. The characters were emotionally indulgent creatures who lost the ability to relate in a normal way to others. Their lifestyles were obsessive-compulsive and addictive.

The characters were self-absorbed narcissists and all leaned heavily to overcompensation. I felt the take-home message was that society at large (heterosexual) should celebrate their sexual exploits and neurosis.

I feel this series is another form of human Terra-forming. Molding the masses to the Illuminati grand plan. My only hope is that there are those of us who remember what a moral, just, and pure life can be. A life absent of the obsessive pursuit of carnal desires. Where tenderness, respect, generosity and real affection rule.
---
Also by Sasha Spencer

Feminism Leaves Bitter Taste When You are Unemployed

Insider Reveals Hollywood's Satanic Underside

Related topics on Homosexuality

Why is Organized Jewry Promoting Homosexuality?

Nancy Allen's Guide to Gay Sex

Insider: Gay Marriage "a Total Farce"

World Expert- Sorry Gay is Not OK

You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2013/05/queer-as-folk-made-me-nauseous.html

Articles >>

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for ""Queer As Folk" show Made Me Nauseous "

Des said (May 22, 2013):

I realized I was gay since I was at the kindergarten, I became an architect. Now I'm 41 but, during my college time I began to frequent gay bars in order to meet guys like me.

At the very beginning I wasn't expect nothing serious to happen (same as heterosexual), but as time passed, I've got involved in more serious relationships. When QAF was aired on HBO channel ( I was 32), for gay males and lesbian, it was the ultimate on TV shows. In some way QAF brought to the light how gays day-by-day lives were (apparently), and in the gay circles everyone identified his/her self with a character, or unless dreamed of "characterize" his/herself as one of them.

Mine was Brian (the advertisement creative and the cynical one). Like him, I became promiscuous and used to spent really wild nights with my best gay friends. The so-over-the-top time came when I spent some holidays in Europe. Then I got back to my country and realized I was almost out of control, and I began to stop.

I have a christian-catholic background with a so loving family and into all this craziness I knew something was wrong. I began to run on-track again and at the end of the training I used to meditate while stretching. I´ve learned by the Internet and some books and articles about this New World Disorder, and pitifully, the truth was found...as others I have been deceived.

QAF is nothing less than a subverting manipulative program from Hollywood pretending to "expose" a gay/ lesbian day-by-day life which differs a lot from reality. The problem is that this TV show as other as Sex & The City or Nip Tuck, became iconic and popular. At the end, gays as straights we look for the same thing, someone to love and care, human beings.

We have plenty of love and we need to give all this love or in the contrary we could drown. Thanks to God I re-discovered myself at a good time and found that I was a tender and loving being and luckily now I share my life with another loving and smart partner. Something key to think about in QAF is the name of the night club present in every chapter "Babylon" and don't the Illuminati came for the first time in the U.S. through Pittsburgh?

Colin said (May 21, 2013):

I live in England and fortunately as yet we dont have such discusting programmes on our TV screens.

To appreciate more of what is going on here I would suggest anyone to read the e-book Full Disclosure , its available to read via truthseeker.com AIDS is man made and was designed to kill on mass. AIDS was spread by vaccines but it hasnt killed and spread as fast and as wide as they had planned or hoped.

Having now learned about this "Queer as Folk" series , its pretty obvious that they want to spread AIDS much faster by encouraging promiscuous sex for those that have a taste for it. Also note that Gay Marriage is being introduced all around the world right now, even though gays never actually asked for it!! Gay couples as a rule don't want to adopt children and become like a proper family, most seem to want promiscuous sex-life.

Like you, I have nothing against Gays as long as they keep themselves to themselves and its not being promoted as the norm and being hetero as being abnormal.

Honestly, everyone should read "Full Disclosure" its a very scary book but better to be informed about what is really going on. Its not for the faint heart-ed!!

The way things are going (America has a black non US Citizen , Muslim President) you will have a Gay couple as future President maybe!! Lets hope common sense prevails before such an event!! Not much Common Sense around these days.!! We live in hope...

Len said (May 21, 2013):

Here is my one line review of this kind of shows:
Putrid and disgusting.

But then, to satanists and such, I suppose, it all seems wonderful and "liberating" !

David said (May 21, 2013):

Henry, the mainstreaming of depravity is right in line with another goal of the Illuminati, i.e., drastic population reduction. Since AIDS and these various lab-concocted flu strains have not had the desired effect of erasing huge blocks of humanity, I think the elite (be they cultural, educational, business or government) believe that normalizing homosexuality will eventually result in fewer people. They certainly are a demented subgroup of mankind.

Glenn said (May 20, 2013):

Well written article by Sasha. I'm sure Sasha took little pleasure in the research component prior to writing.

I may have stumbled upon something that might reinforce the argument that gays are being used by the illuminati to weaken us morally and spiritually, thus break us further into their compliance. I wondered who was the brainchild behind queer as folk, and it appears Daniel Lipman and Ron Cowen were a gay, Jewish couple.

If you read the attachment below, some readers may be surprised that the ' producers' met with flak from their own gay community, as it did not accurately portray gay life. So not only does it appear that the content of ' queer as folk ', was received as offensive by heterosexuals, but possibly from many quarters of the homosexual community as well.

http://www.omnilexica.com/?q=ron+cowen

Was it meant to degrade homosexuals too ?

If not, why all the depraved animalistic loveless sodomy and fornication ?

Glenn

The show's portrayal sounds pretty accurate to me and the producers defended it as such.

Gays are notoriously prone to self denial and self delusion, and many would find this mirror image as disgusting as heterosexuals do, and would like to disavow it.

henry

JG said (May 20, 2013):

Very disturbing! There seems to be a big misconception about the propagators of this kind of trash. They believe these people to be normal heterosexuals that have an agenda to pervert the masses. Not true, most of these "agents of Satan" are gay themselves. It's like believing that drug dealers aren't drug users when in most cases they are. A lot of what goes on here in the American Cinema goes on in Israel. This is an attempt to create a "learned behavior" void of all morality and purity.

NEW YORKER MAGAZINE cartoon

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

May 18, 2013

paul-noth-with-a-real-live-woman-right-here-why-would-you-turn-to-the-internet-for-new-yorker-cartoon.jpg

My wife and I got a kick
out of this cartoon
in the latest New Yorker

Knights of Columbus are NOT Masons says Hernando, a Spanish Reader

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

May 16, 2013

Knights of Columbus are NOT Masons says Hernando, a Spanish Reader

I have just seen this article saying that The Knights of Columbus are Masons?
Come on!
Here you have the web and the history of the Knights of Columbus, founded by a priest and giving honours to the Virgin Mary (Mother for Us, the Catholics), to the Pope, etc.
http://www.kofc.org/en//index.html
According to this point of view, even all the Catholics could be "secret or infiltrated" Masons.

The priest of my Parish Church could be a secret mason.
The Bishop of my diocese could be mason.
And all the 1.000 millions of Catholics could be masons. The world upside-down!
This person says that the Klu-Klux-Klan was catholic or christian?
Not at all, sir. The fact that they burn a cross in their meetings or rituals don't mean that they were Christians as an association. Perhaps some of the KKK members could be covert Catholics or Christians but NOT the association officially.

The symbols.

Here in Spain, the Civil Guard (a Police Corp) also has the FASCIO, as a symbol, but is not a mason society. The fascio comes from the Romans and in Spain, my country, there were Romans, and called this country HISPANIA.
Probably the Civil Guard (Police, Police, Police) took this symbol as precedent from the Romans or simply as a group symbol, meaning that this Police would be united and grouped as a corp to prosecute the delinquents, NOT AS MASONS, PLEASE!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Guard_(Spain)

One could ask then: Do they have the crown in their logo because they only serve the King and Queen? NOOO!! They have this symbol of the crown because in Spain we have as a political system a Parliamentary Monarchy and even our shield in Spain has a crown, though many people would prefer to have a Republic.

Conclusion:

Some people, IGNORANT of the real and authentic meaning of things don't interpret things adequately. What I have to hear today is:

1) The Knights of Columbus, founded by an Irish priest who wanted to help the inmigrants to New England, and that forms a society with good relationships with the Church, within the orthodoxy of Catholics belief (faith, Virgin Mary, Pope, etc) is... MASON ?

2) A symbol as the "fascio", the Roman fascio (unknown in the other side of the Atlantic Ocean because the Romans weren't there, is interpreted as... MASON? when there is a Police Corp in Spain called "Guardia Civil" (or Civil Guard) that has the same symbol. Perhaps the Civil Guard is also... MASON? I don't think so, because dozens and dozens of members of the Civil Guard in Spain have been assassinated by the terrorist group ETA (this is not, as in USA think, a separatist group of the Basque Country, but a TERRORIST GROUP who has murdered around 1.000 people (police, judges, politicians, journalists, civil people, children...)

A Canadian Jew Wakes up by S

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

May 14, 2013

A Canadian Jew Wakes up by S

I grew up in a traditional Conservative Jewish home in Toronto (USDS day school, shul, etc).

My parents made Aliyah with our family in 1982, and I finished high school in an Orthodox school.

As we were planning on staying in Israel I volunteered for the army after highschool to serve 3 years in the Golani Infantry Brigade. The first year was great and I actually was awarded outstanding cadette after basic training.

Then things went downhill after we were sent to serve in the West-Bank (Ramallah, Schem, Jenin).

One night we were sent out to arrest "troublemakers" who'd been seen attacking Israeli patrols. The troublemakers in question turned out to be 2 youths, aged 10 & 13. After arresting them (moms screaming) we took them to the municipality, and the first was sent up while we guarded the second (13 year old) whose hands and feet were bound and was lying on the floor of our truck. The driver started to beat him mercilessly, and I stepped in to stop, saying "he's only a boy".

This guy then grabbed a night stick and came at me calling me a "dirty traitor of the Jewish people" and other expletives.
My friends in my unit separated us, but I was shaken to the core.

Then several months later the first Intifada broke out (Dec 1987) and all hell broke loose in the "shtachim". My ideological anchors of Zionism-Holocaust-Jewish people were shredded in the violence that was being perpetrated on innocent women and children. I could not make sense of what was happening and had a bit of a psychological breakdown that my family (then back in TO) couldn't relate to (and still can't 25 years later).

After many years of spiritual and political searching through psychotherapy, Buddhism, West-African and Native-American shamanism I finally came to a realization that God was still knocking on my door. But this is another story that I'd be happy to share later (I'm a single dad- go to get up for work/school in the morning).

Keep up the great work- more people are starting to "wake up" & God Bless,