Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below- Pope Condemned Freemasonry as Satanism (scroll down)

Ottawa Shooting: Eye Witnesses Involved in the Hoax?

November 28, 2014

Nathan American Bandana.jpg
(And here is a picture of him wearing an American Bandana. His sister "loves America." Are the Cirillo's American or Canadian?)

There are so many contradictions in the accounts
of the shooting of Nathan Cirrillo and the attack on Canada's
parliament Oct 22
that "DD" has concluded it was a hoax.

by DD

Busted witnesses. What they saw doesn't match up to the official narrative. It's not even close!

An independent investigation is required.  Most of the witnesses that I've reviewed are involved with this hoax. Their accounts appear to be scripted. Their different recollections are  inconsistent, while other accounts are flat out wrong based on the RCMP surveillance video. Can this be simple human error? I don't think so.

Few example:

1) Barry Willis, a utility worker working on Parliament Hill who is ex-military says he had the gun pointed at him and witnessed the car hijacking. From his perspective, during the hijacking, the driver got out of the car and kneeled down. The shooter pointed the gun at Willis' head but he reconsidered,  got in the car and drove towards Center Block. The driver remained kneeled well after the shooter drove off. The RCMP surveillance video shows NONE of this. You don't see the shooter pointing the gun at anyone and you don't see the driver kneeled down ever. You see him get out and sprint away!       RCMP Video:  Start at 2min mark

2) Greta Levy, NDP Press Secretary's account also defies belief. She says was leaving Center Block when she heard someone yell "Gun!" and she promptly dropped to the ground. A few seconds later she lifted her head and saw the gunman walk up the ramp leading to Center Block. This is total nonsense! He drove! Again, the same video that refutes Barry Willis's account destroys her account. Greta Levy interview:  at 15second mark. RCMP video: go to 2min 40sec to see car drive up to Center Block.

3) CPR and Anthony Di Monte, Chief of Ottawa's Paramedic Services--

Here is a list of problems with him:

·         Chief goes to the scene at the War Memorial after a meeting in City Hall. He is dressed in paramedic gear. He should be in uniform!
·         911 call came in as a cardiac arrest. Bogus. Why wasn`t it called in as a shooting victim?
·         Legs were up. Should be down. This minimizes bleeding. NEVER done. Ask any para med.

The victim was surrounded and blocked by six people. Cirillo`s hands were on his chest while receiving CPR. Should be on his side. Dead giveaway of a fake.
·         There was simultaneous chest compressions and mouth to mouth. You NEVER do it this way.
·         The persons doing mouth to mouth and chest compressions weren`t communicating/co-ordinating with each other. In fact one of them, doing compressions, was distracted--looking up and away.
·         Chief claims, ``.. extremely traumatic entry and exit wound.`` WHERE IS THE BLOOD? You can see Cirillo`s bare chest when they were putting in him the ambulance. No sign of massive bleeding. How about pneumothorax Nope. This is pure poppycock.
·         What gets me? Chief Di Monte says the bystanders were doing a great and effective job!! What?? And Cirillo had a solid carotid as a result. Wow. Pure fictional nonsense.

4) Solomon vs David Akins: Who got the Parliament Hill Shooting Story Correct?

We don`t know. It's sad. David Akin is a Gemini Award Winning Journalist and Evan Solomon the host of Power and Politics give us details that don`t match up to each other. Of nine crucial points of the story they only agree on ONE. -Kevin Vickers shot and killed Michae Zehaf-Bibeau. What happened in there?? Here`s a synopsis:
                                                                                                              Evan Solomon CBC        David Akin Sun Media

solomon.jpg(Evan Solomon, left)

Armed Parliament Guards                                         yes                                  no
Plain Clothes Office at top of Stairs in Rotunda        no                                   yes
2nd Plain Clothes Officer in Rotunda                         no                                   yes

3rd Plain Clothes Officer Guarding
Conservative Caucus Room                                       no                                   yes

3rd Plain Clothes Officer Exchanges
a SINGLE shot with shooter                                      no                                   yes

after exchange of gun fire with parliament
guards at entrance shooter runs
down hall of honour                                                  yes                                   no

akin.jpg(left, David Akin)

Kevin Vickers grabs his pistol & runs to
other side of pillar where shooter was hiding
in alcove by parliament library                                 yes                                   no

Kevin Vickers drops to ground
and crawls to the pillar                                            no                                      yes

Kevin Vickers shoots and kills the shooter              yes                                    yes

5) The Cirillo Family raises questions:

a) Kathy Cirillo, Nathan's mother, still uses her married name many, many years after an ugly divorce.

b) We don`t know Nathan`s biological father`s first name. His name is nowhere to be found on the obituary or anywhere in the media. He is, allegedly, living in Costa Rica. Who is he? Why this void?

c) Nathan's sister, Nicole, is married and her husband's name, according to the Obituary is Richard Schmith. Nathan's other sister, Natasha, is apparently married to Jonathon Tuckman. Mr. Schmith is a 60-something year old retired man working at No Frills as a grocery clerk and lives in Hamilton according to his Facebook page. Jonathon, is an Australian who currently lives in LA, CA. In the funeral video you can see Nicole`s husband and he is NOT the 60-something year old Richard Schmith. Natasha's history below blows the cover of this family wide open.

d) Cirillo's sister Natasha is most likely an American from California. Her Instagram account shows her dressed in apparel with the American Flag on it. Her hash tags say things like, ``I Love America``. There are pictures of her and Jonathon in California. There are pictures of her in Hamilton (none with Jonathon) but her hash tag comments suggest she is new in Canada. What are the implications? See for yourself here:

cirillo temp id card DNF.jpge) Nathan Cirillo was employed temporarily with DND. His ID card expired on Oct 22nd 2014, two days after he was killed.

f) David Cirillo, Nathan's cousin, posted the death of his cousin on his Facebook page 25 minutes before it was officially announcement. (see screenshot below) How did he know? There is also a picture of David and Nathan on Facebook. David makes a remark that he'll be in Costa Rica to watch World Cup soccer game against Italy. It's a strange coincidence that he is going to Costa Rica to watch a game in a country that Nathan's estranged father apparently currently lives. And the game in Costa Rica is not live. It's being played in Brazil! Why go?

What do all these family observations and findings imply? Individually maybe some of these points can be explained. Sure, you can write off my observation of Kathy's surname but together all the above points imply something very serious and sinister.  Subterfuge is at play here. We've been duped and infiltrated. Remember, the Americans reported details before Canadians did. This Cirillo family is a front for propaganda to sell us another unending war. Explain to me how we can reconcile Natasha's "American" Instagram?

How about her patriotism for Canada? Oh, I think I will wave an American Flag. #hashtag "I Love America". Canadian? Yeah, right. Smoking gun? Damn right it is. We have a big problem here.
Screenshot 2014-11-21 20.47.06.pngRelated

Makow- Making Sense of Ottawa Shooting
Also by DD: Bogus TV Report Casts Doubt on Ottawa Shooting


You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Below -- What is America Declared itself Christian? (scroll down)

Pope Said Freemasonry is Satanism

November 27, 2014

leo-xiii.jpgLeft, Leo XIII (Pope from 1878-1903)

Until Freemasons took over the Papacy,
many Catholic popes condemned the cult
as a mortal threat.

In 1902, Pope Leo XIII said the aim of Freemasonry
is "to exercise an occult  overlordship upon society;
[its] sole raison d'etre is to wage war against God and His church."
 Modern history and the New World Order are the product of  Masonic propaganda and subterfuge.
 Obama, the Bushes, Clinton are all Freemasons. Communism, Socialism, Liberalism, Zionism are branches of Freemasonry.  

Abridged from a traditional Catholic website
unambiguously called "Destroy Freemasonry"
Originally Posted Feb 2, 2012

Addressing the Church April 20, 1884, Pope Leo XIII published his magnificent Encyclical "Humanum Genus."

Taking up Saint Augustine's analogy of the two cities which on earth constitute the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Satan, the Pontiff reviews the progress of Freemasonry and writes:

"It is now [public knowledge] that [Freemasons] undertake to ruin the Holy Church, so as to succeed, if it is possible, in the complete dispossession of Christian nations of all the gifts they owe to Our Savior Jesus Christ.

"As a result, in the space of a century and a half, the sect of the Freemasons has made incredible progress. Making use ... of audacity and cunning, Masonry has invaded all the ranks of social hierarchy, and in the modern States it has begun to seize a power which is almost equivalent to Sovereignty.

Leo XIII refers frequently to the hypocrisy which is the basis of "White Freemasonry" and mentions its revolutionary aims which turns it into "Red Masonry."

This Encyclical most strikingly reveals the triple Masonic character, namely:


obamamason1.jpg(Left, Obama and most of our political elite are Masons, a branch of Illuminati)

1. Counter Morality

"It aims at the complete destruction of the foundations of justice and honesty. In this way Freemasons make themselves the auxiliaries of those who wish that, like an animal, man had no other rule of conduct than his own desires -- Such a scheme can only dishonor human kind and ignominiously cast him into perdition."

" Laying this down, they care little for duties to God, or pervert them by erroneous and vague opinions. For they deny that anything has been taught by God; they allow no dogma of religion or truth which cannot be understood by the human intelligence, nor any teacher who ought to be believed by reason of his authority."

2. Counter State

Pope Leo XIII foresaw that Freemasonry would soon form the Super State [i.e. world government]. [Whence] there was issued the Masonic dogma of separation of Church and State; thence, issued also the anti-religious laws which Brother Bethmont, [a Freemason explained as follows:]

"Violence against the Church leads nowhere, we shall use other means. We shall organize a persecution which shall be both clever and legal; we shall surround the Church with a network of laws, decrees and ordinances which will stifle it without shedding one drop of blood."

Who, may I ask, is making those closely woven nets of laws, decrees and ordinances? The State, of course, but it is a Masonic State, an irreligious State under the power of a Super State which at the present moment is the Ruler of the World.

It is with a feeling of fear that one brings to mind the death sentence pronounced against humanity in the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion."

"When we introduced into the State organism the poison of Liberalism its whole political complexion underwent a change. States have been seized with a mortal illness -- blood poisoning. All that remains is to await the end of their death agony."

That Super State is called Judeo-Masonry.

3. Counter Church

handshale.jpg(left, Tony Blair fondles Benedict XVI's knuckle)

Lastly, Leo XIII concludes by unmasking the Satanism of Judeo-Masonry:

"The facts which we have reviewed throw sufficient light upon inner constitution of Freemasons and show clearly the road they are following in order to reach their goal. Their chief dogmas are so completely and manifestly opposed to sane reason that it is difficult to imagine deeper perversion. In reality, is it not the peak of madness and of the most audacious impiety to be so presumptuous as to want to destroy the religion and the Church created by God Himself: and assured of His perpetual protection; and after 18 centuries to want to replace it with the customs and institutions of pagans?"

"Still no less horrible nor easy to bear to witness the repudiation of those gifts which, in His mercy, Jesus Christ bestowed first on individuals, then to human beings grouped both in families and in nations. Even the enemies of Christianity acknowledge the supreme value of those gifts.

"There is no denying that in this foolish and criminal plan it is easy to understand the implacable hatred and passion for revenge which animate Satan toward Jesus Christ. We refuse to follow the dictates of such iniquitous masters that bear the names of Satan and of all evil passions."


Complete Text of Genus Humanum

Other Popes and Masons on Freemasonry
Makow - Freemasonry- Mankind's Deathwish
(Review of Juri Lina's Architects of Deception)
----------Kolbe- Freemasonry is a Jewish Proxy
--------- "The Aim of Freemasonry is the Triumph of Communism"

First Comment from Dan:

Pecci was sixty eight years old when he was elected pope in 1878.  He wrote 85 encyclicals.  Humanum Genus was #14, published in 1884.  

Vincenzo Pecci (Leo XIII) was one of seven brothers born of an ancient Italian noble family residing near Rome. His brother Giuseppe became a Holy Order Jesuit priest, Vincenzo joined the secular clergy, specializing in law and politics.  At 27 he was appointed by Pope Gregory XVI as a papal prelate.  (That's something like a West Point graduate being made an attache to the General Chiefs of Staff upon graduation).   The pope then made Monsignor Pecci the legate (provincial administrator) of  Benevento.  In those days the post of legate in the Papal States had civil authority.  The situation in the province was similar to the Mexican Mafia wars in Nueva Laredo and Juarez.  Pecci arrested powerful kingpins and administered a successful military crackdown on thugs. With order restored, he reformed local taxes to restore normal trade between neighboring provinces.

Humanum Genus takes on a fuller dimension when you know that the future Leo XIII was already an Archbishop when the
'Revolutions of 1848' broke out across Europe.  Also dubbed the 'Springtime of the Peoples' these upheavals of riots and assassinations were fomented through the Jacobin lodges of Freemasonry. [1]   He lived through Garibaldi's openly Masonic war on Vatican,  [2] and the end of the temporal power of the Papal States. 

He also lived through the First Vatican Council.  (Whenever the Roman Catholic Church lost serious concessions of power they called a Council to get their act together.  The previous big council was Trent in the 16th century, in response to the Protestant Reformation).

It helps to know Leo XIII's full story before reading Humanum Genus.  In his era, International Freemasonry had pulled out all the stops to destroy the Roman Catholic Church.   It wasn't until Garibaldi found the Roman Church still too embedded in Western civilization's institutions, not to mention the vast numbers of the faithful throughout the world.   That's when Mazzini drafted 'plan b'.  We have that document today, it's called Alta Vendita.[3] It details a long term business plan to infiltrate the Roman Catholic clergy, to eventually take control of it, and turn it into a tool of Freemasonry.  

I know some readers are Catholics who've been studying these things, and the question for them isn't "if" Freemasonry hijacked the Catholic Church, it's a question of "WHEN".   Well, we know for sure from Bella Dodd's testimony at the McCarthy Hearings in 1953 that the Communist Party USA funded at least 1000 subversives into the seminaries during the 1930's who were to be given every manner of support fair and foul (including blackmail) to rise to highest ranks of the Episcopate.[4]

But Freemasonry was in the Vatican many years before that.  Over a century ago, at least.

The late Canon lawyer, Monsignor Gregory Hesse (once Secretary to Cardinal Stickler at the Vatican), said that Pope Leo's own Secretariat of State was later rumored to have founded his own irregular Masonic lodge inside the Vatican.  He was Cardinal Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro [5], a lodge connected to Theodor Reusse's Ordo Templi Orientis, the year before Crowley took it over.

Also, Freemasonry in the Life and Times of Pius IX


[3] The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita

[4] CPUSA Leader, Dr Bella Dodd's testimony, House Unamerican Activities Committee, 1953.

[5] Fr. Hesse on the Papacy & the Crisis in the Church

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Pope Said Freemasonry is Satanism"

Bill S said (November 28, 2014):

I read your recent articles Pope Said Freemasonry is Satanism and What If America Declared Itself Christian? with interest. I noticed that several commentators believe that the Protestant Reformation was a Jewish or Freemason plot to undermine the True Church. I was a "born-again" evangelical Christian from 1978-2000 (22 years). This is the first time I have ever heard such a claim. While it is certainly possible, I am currently in a state of cognitive dissonance. All I ever wanted was to know God and live the abundant life He intended for me live. The Gospel of grace thru faith in Christ Jesus promised that Life. While I never really achieved that life (in this world) - and eventually my faith faded away due to disappointment - the idea that the Catholic Church of pagan Constantine is the True Church sounds ridiculous to my mind. Luther, Zwingli and Calvin were heroic Reformers of a corrupt institution. Their followers - true believers - paid the ultimate price when the Satanic Catholics launched the Inquisition (Counter Reformation). Catholics fighting Freemasons DOES seem like an intramural Satanic scrimmage to me.

Richard said (November 27, 2014):

Hi Henry, regarding the Leo XIII Pope, he was the one who had a horrific dream/vision about Satan and the church. He realized that it was a force to be reckoned with. He passed an edict that the St Michaels the Archangels prayer be said at the end of every Mass. It was but in modern time, even my Catholic childhood of the 50's I do not remember this being done.

The St Michaels prayer is a fervent appeal for that Archangel to prevail against Satan and his forces. It is said frequently at exorcisms. We said it often in daily school prayers.
I like your website and visit it often, it is a treasure of info especially about Russia and its being part of the now.

Tony B said (November 27, 2014):

Excellent, Henry.

Have you noticed yet how vicious protestants become against Catholicism as opposed to Catholics in general simply giving the facts? I grew up with this on the protester side. It's constantly, albeit cleverly, drummed into every protestant from day one - mostly through their (every one) Jewish owned publishing houses. So the protestants mostly do it out of ignorance but it is willful ignorance. Maybe even lazy ignorance. They never investigate on their own, don't even read the bibles they swear by, they just take the published handouts for gospel.

Cliff Shack said (February 3, 2012):

dare say that the Vatican had been infiltrated by the Davidic crypto-Jews controlling Freemasonry. Leo's words remind me of Hitler's rhetoric against international Jewish bankers who were his controllers.

The crypto-Davidians, like the Freemasons always leave tell-tale clues in the form of open secrets if you understand their basic symbolism. Take ole Leo for example. Leo is the lion. Not just any lion. The lion of Judah aka David. Does David reign over the church through his descendants? Wasn't the church begun by a son of David? It should come as no surprise that the sons of David have claimed the papal throne as their own.

Mark said (February 3, 2012):

In reply to Martin, below re. pot calling kettle black.

The church is controlled by freemasons and the love of God is not that of the creator, but that of Gold, Oil and Drugs. I am not denying in the past that the church was corrupt but within, there were many good men and women who sought to help and other, whom, like many in life were incapable of speaking out for fear of danger to them and their loved ones. Remember the Godfather part III? Remember the pope who was removed because he was going to do something about the corruption? How many people do we know of (and don't) who have met with the same situation?

Within all establishments there are inner and outer circles. The outer circle is the lies for the masses. The inner circle is the control mechanism and most certainly occult, very probably Satanic. The inner is the esoteric and the outer the exoteric. How can people do anything about a situation if they are ignorant to its danger? This is the reality of the world we live in, in all walks of life. As I have already said, people are simply removed who pose a threat to the heavily guarded inner circle that controls reality for all.

Christine said (February 3, 2012):

Thanks for the excellent article on Freemasonry. You may wish to remind your readers that Achille Cardinal Lienart of Lille, France, was one of the leaders of Vatican II. On his deathbed in 1973, he confessed to being a 33rd degree Freemason and gave his confessor permission to publish his remarks.

He also admitted that changes to the Sacraments make them invalid, which means no grace is transmitted. Lienart said that the purpose of changing the Sacraments at Vatican II was to destroy the Mass, Priesthood, and Apostolic Succession. See:

Cardinal Admits His Participation in a Freemasonic Plot at Vatican II to Destroy the Mass
Achille Lienart Declared on His Deathbed that He Was a Freemason Executing the Lodge's Plan

Martin said (February 3, 2012):

This is the pot calling the kettle black.

TC said (February 3, 2012):

In defense of our friends and neighbors who have been drawn into Freemasonry, I must say that most of them are probably unaware of it's true nature.


Below-Insiders Looted Gold Worth $200b from South African Reserve Bank - Scroll Down

What If America Declared Itself Christian?

November 26, 2014

83% of Americans identify as Christians yet Christmas
must hide under an alias, "the holidays."

In the Jewish Daily Forward, Avital Burg asks "what if"
the US had legislation like Israel which declared itself Jewish.

Editor's Note:  Avital Burg uses the term "Protestant." I have changed it to "Christian." This is satire where she transposes the new Israeli law to America. She is speaking as an American Jew cognizant of the hypocrisy of American Jews who support Israel's actions yet would oppose similar action here. However, as a Canadian Jew, I think Israel is justified if European-origin countries could do the same, and if minorities could be protected both in Israel and elsewhere.  The contradiction that Berg exposes exists because Illuminati Jews and their Freemason go'fers rule both Israel and the West. The European Christian people of the West need a "national homeland" just like Israel, not an Illuminati Jewish world government. Everybody should have a country that reflects their racial, religious and cultural identity. I am interested in your views.

by Avital Burg
If America Had Laws Like Israel


A new proposed bill, supported by senators on both sides of the aisle, will finally define and determine the United States of America as the land of the Christian People, the largest religious constituency in the U.S. and the group out of which America's founding fathers and ruling leadership emerged.

The new law aims to anchor Christian values in the laws of the land, inspired by the spirit of the American Constitution. Furthermore, the bill proceeds to state that the U.S. will continue to uphold a fundamentally democratic character. According to the new law, the United States will be fully committed to the foundations of Freedom, Justice, and Peace, in light of our Lord Jesus Christ.

At the same time, the bill suggests, the right to implement a national self-definition will be exclusively reserved for Christian People. According to the new bill, Christian values will serve as inspiration to lawmakers and judges at the different levels of the United States' legislative and judicial branches. In cases where a court of justice encounters difficulties in ruling over issues that have no readily available answers in the Law, in the Christian Canon, or in logical reasoning, it will then rule according to the principles of freedom, justice, integrity and peace stemming from the Christian heritage.

In addition, the national emblems of the United States, such as its flag and national anthem, will be drawn directly from the tradition of the Christian Church, and the official calendar of the U.S. will follow the Christian liturgical year. Finally, the United States will further act to preserve and entrench the Christian historical and cultural tradition and to cultivate it in the U.S. and abroad.

Any reader who has gotten this far would probably note that such a law could not be passed or even seriously proposed by the United States legislature. In Israel, however, it has become a fundamental law, on a level equivalent to a constitutional amendment in the United States.


The different clauses listed above are not a free interpretation of the bill or wild projections of what this bill could imply; they are the clauses of the original Hebrew bill, translated into the U.S. political context. I have simply replaced the phrase "the Jewish People" and its associated traits with the "Christian People" ...

There are currently close to eight million people living in Israel, more than 20% of which are Palestinian citizens. After years of de facto discrimination against Palestinian citizens of Israel in various aspects of daily life, this new law, ...will make such discrimination official: Palestinians will become formally, legally, second-class citizens. And this is without even mentioning the Palestinians who still live under the Israeli occupation in the West Bank.

If you would oppose such a law had it been proposed in your own country, how can you support it when proposed in another country? If you would have objected to such a law because it would discriminate against you as a member of a religious or ethnic minority, how can you possibly support such a law when it is being put forward in your name, with you as the would-be member of Israel's Jewish majority?



Gilad Atzmon - Bill Institutionalizes Israel's Racist Character

First comment from "Elm":

If America were ever to declare itself a "Christian nation," THIS nation would be anathema to the both the intentions and codified wishes of the American founding fathers -- a nation of political equals -- "of, by and for the people," which Abraham Lincoln too prayed, "would not perish from this earth." Indeed, most if not all of the American founding fathers, worked AGAINST the founding of a "Christian" or clerically dominated government. Such a "Christian nation would not "save" America. To be sure, early Americans had come FROM the old world, the Roman Inquisition, and its manifold religious persecutions, and knew better.
The constitutional republic is founded, by-en-large upon the teachings of Hermes Trismagestus, the Mosaic code and the democratic Iroquois confederation, not Christianity. As Christianity has so often done in the past, any such ostensibly "Christian" government, would DESTROY freedom and sufferance of enlightened cultural, moral and religious differences. A "Christian" government would not preserve the rights of its citizens to the unalienable rights to life, liberty and a pursuit of happiness. Indeed, history records, it was American Free Masonry, not Christianity, of EITHER the Calvanist or Catholic kind, which made it possible for men of varied origins to work cooperatively, and join together as equal brothers in America's founding.
In other words, Christianity, could, and would NOT have founded the American constitutional republic.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "What If America Declared Itself Christian? "

Pat said (November 27, 2014):

Re your last article on A Christian USA - the trouble with Jews is that being a Jew is more than just having a religion, it means being part of a nation - or a tribe. This is why you are always in conflict and seen as traitors or a fifth column. Canada - or France or whatever - is your country -but you still feel tied to Israel. It's all a lot of hogwash. First of all, Ashkenazis are from Khazaria. Second, the Hebrews never really ran their own country for any length of time. Herod and the Maccabees.

Egyptian history only mentions putting down rebellious tribes. It's even more ridiculous when you consider that most Jews are secular. And those who are religious follow the Talmud, not the Torah. The notion of Judeo-Christianity is nonsense. The Talmud is openly anti-Gentile. Only the Jew counts. The rest are human animals. What sort of a religion is that?! Other religions are more compassionate.

According to the Orthodox, Jews are not allowed to settle in the Land of Israel until the Messiah leads them in. Many Jews don't even know that! The average non-religious Jew doesn't even know where the Ten Commandments are in the Torah!! But since 1948, everyone got excited and there are now hundreds of thousands of Orthodox Jews living in Israel - but not wanting to serve in the Army - living separately from the Israelis but accepting welfare. And as for the Jews in the Diaspora, have they now got two countries? If it were a question of religion, they would be like everyone else. They would be loyal to the country they were born in - or adopted - and practise whatever religion they wanted. But sending money to Israel ($3 billion a year from the US) and enlisting in the IDF - is just disloyal. To tell you the truth, I think the Jews are a little crazy! Meshuggah!

Even if they didn't have the Palestinians they'd be killing each other! The German Jews look down on the East European Jews and the Sephardi. And they in turn they look down on the Mizrahi (Arab Jews)and the African Jews (Falasha and Lemba) and Indian Jews. There's even animosity between the secular Israelis and the Orthodox and between the ultra-orthodox sects. It's an unholy mess! Even in the diaspora - there's no love between the Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews. I know personally how the Russian Jews treated the German Jewish refugees in Shanghai and how the Sephardis are discriminated against here. The saddest part is the Palestinians, who are really Jews. They are descendants of Judean farmers who stayed on the land and converted first to Christianity and then to Islam - to avoid paying taxes! It was just the elite Jews who were kicked out of the cities and moved to Greece and Italy.

Anyway, Kissinger said a few years ago that in 20 years there would be no Israel. Also that Jeb Bush would be the next president. He must know the plan! Rothschildia from the Nile to the Jordan.

Tyron said (November 27, 2014):

I concur with you about all races having a homeland with a majority identity culture and so on. However the problem is that the 3 Corporation City States (Vatican City/ City of London/DC-US) with their Jews and cohorts who control them plan on collapsing those power centers and transferring them to "Israel". Then the elite "Jews" will kick their enablers to the curb and declare a World Government of their own, based on their race with their own "Messiah". This leaves Christians (esp white/Xians) in a massive dilemma. Do nothing and be ruled by a hostile elite who will try to continue to exterminate them or elect a leader and march on "Israel", taking it over as they administer to these Satanists their own version of the Nuremberg trials.

Also, to all those ignorant of America's history, SCOTUS declared the obvious in 1892, 1936 and 1952 that America was a Christian Nation! Learn the difference between a Nation- Country and Government.

Tony B said (November 27, 2014):

Nevertheless "Gerald" is correct. The rub of the figures is that protestants in general THINK they are Christians but they are not. They are a sorry pretense. It took me a lifetime to learn this. Everything that makes Christianity what it is was cast out when the "reformers" took over. Plus they murdered Catholics wholesale in many gruesome ways for refusing to stop worshiping in their ancient religion. And confiscated their property on top of it. How Christian is that?

Protestantism is in most ways a Jewish cult, it was created by Jews. Luther admitted finally that they had been his advisers and he hated them for it, Calvin or Cohen, was a Jew as revealed by other Jews. The reformation in England was an Amsterdam Jewish project, as was the invasion by Cromwell, the theft of Church property and, eventually, British aristocracy became Jewish, for the most part. It has been and is still the seat of the Rothschild dynasty.

Practically all of New England was settled by Puritans, a vicious sect who don't come close to representing Christianity. Same with the Quakers, sans the viciousness. The founders were mostly freemasons with deists and other protestant non-Christian variations among them.

The U.S. "Christian" religion is largely a protestant smörgåsbord, a mish-mash of insanity, do-goodism, greed, self-serving self-righteousness and wild-eyed fanaticism. Any one with a bit of charisma might come up with a new protestant sect. That's how they all were created.

Dan said (November 27, 2014):

The President of Israel (Reuven Rivlin) doesn't think the ‘Jewish nation-state’ bill is a good idea, or good timing. He's quoted
“Does this bill not in fact play into the hands... of those who see contradiction between our being a free people in our land, and the freedoms of the non-Jewish communities in our midst?"

He's right, and what he's really saying has been put more plainly by former defense minister Moshe Arens: “We don’t need legislation to make Israel a Jewish state...It is a Jewish state because the majority of the population is Jewish".

However, I like the bill for it's lack of duplicity.

Robert K said (November 26, 2014):

"J" says that Christ was not political. It seems to me that his fierce criticisms of governmental and religious authorities were intrinsically political. He certainly had no interest in "getting power" in the sense of directing an organization capable of intimidating or dominating other persons; instead, the example he set was to serve them. Politics is about how power is used in human society, and it is as political an act to distribute it as to centralize it. Love is bound to want it distributed. "The simplest peasant loving his cow is more divine than any monarch whose monarchy is his glory." (George MacDonald, Unspoken Sermons, III, 1889, p. 9)

Fredie said (November 26, 2014):

The USA wasn’t founded by Christians they were obviously of a masonic background and showed as much in the symbols they chose. If anything you could accuse them of tolerating Christianity for the same reasons the roman Caesars invented it –for the control and subjugation of the people. This is why they were so adamant about religious freedom-freedom from the constraints a Christian nation would bring-

Larry C said (November 26, 2014):

Henry, since George Washington swore his oath of office with his hand on a Masonic Bible and Washington, D.C. itself is rife with Masonic symbolism including an Egyptian obelisk (Nimrod's penis) known as the Washington Monument and a Capitol Building shaped like Semiramis' uterus and ovaries, it would seem that the U.S. was founded on Masonic principles.

Why else would the place be called the District of Columbia with Columbia being a pagan goddess and the streets be laid out in the shape of an owl reminiscent of the one at Bohemian Grove?

Besides, if every person in America was a Christian it would be a nation of Christians not a Christian nation, that is, if anyone ever paid any attention to what Jesus intended when He said, "My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence." John 18:36 ASV

Henry, as always, I appreciate you asking us for our views because I'm full of them

Gerald said (November 26, 2014):

Protestants are not Christians, sir. What do you think they are protesting against??


Thanks Gerald,

80% of Americans identify as Christians and only 1/3 of these are Catholics


How Illuminati Jewish Domination was Spun in 1940

November 14, 2014


CBC uses Sign of Satan (Baphomet) as logo

October 19, 2014

RYC_Top100.jpgCanadian Broadcasting Corporation, Canada's Government-owned propaganda
service uses Sign of Satan (Baphomet) as logo for a campus music talent search.

Hillary Flashback

October 18, 2014