Duane said (May 22, 2012):

o look at what the avengers are about, you only have to look at the ancient greeks.

Hercules, Perseus, Theseus etc ......

And to understand how the Greek hegemony used them.

The greek kings all claimed to be descendants of these mythical heroes or of the "Gods" which apparently sired them.... from this we get much of our mythology wether it be Artemis, Diana, Nimrod, Semrianis, Hurn, Hecate, Osiris, Isis or any of the other man made gods.

To the ordinary man, the message was simple,... "you cant compare to these heroes and therefore cant touch us because we claim to be their decendants from the gods who created them...... bow slave".

Thats what the superhero story is about. Its to remind you .... little man, that you cant change the world around you because you are fragile and weak and anly those with godlike powers can ease your pain. In the modern media new heroes have been created and injected into our mindsets to remind us that unless we are like them we can do nothing.

I have known a few great people in my life .... some from special forces.... and they were not huge muscular juggernauts. They were simply very gifted people who had the will and wit to withstand the events which opposed the objectives that they were asked to achieve. Some of them were ugly bastards.... and not the pretty greek theseus which the women (and probably many homosexual men) would lust after. However they would probably be capable of doing more that a cartoon thor!

Peter said (March 30, 2012):

This really shows that even when a nine bob note has a moment of sanity and decides to throw himself off a bridge the sick brigade start looking around for the nearest normal person to blame.

Its not just uphill gardeners that are affected in this way when American soldiers return from their overseas murderfest the true enormity of the realization of what they have done leads many of them to hit reset. Of all social groups American soldiers have the highest suicide rate. I don't see any of them blaming Buddhists for the dilemma. That would be bad Karma

John said (March 30, 2012):

Henry-- here's proof that the 'normalization of homosexuality' has been very successful. -- John K.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/06/11-bizarrely-wrong-beliefs-americans-have-about-themselves/239810/#slide1

Scott said (March 29, 2012):

During the mid to late 80's, top stand-up comedians used to include material about gays in their routines. Eddie Murphy and Andrew "Dice" Clay were two of the biggest and best at that time. Both were under pressure from gay groups about their jokes. Now, survey the landscape. Any gay references are either supportive or encouraging.

Hopefully, cooler heads prevail with this Dharun Ravi situation, and he faces nothing more than deportation.

T said (March 29, 2012):

I attended a homosexuality tolerance (read promotion) session here in Pakistan, purely for curiosity.

Since Pakistan is intolerant of gays, apostates and adulterers, these guys would dare not come out. This session was conducted at a private venue, which is supposedly working to alleviate intellectual poverty, but the themes they promote are feminism, atheism and homosexuality. There is zero tolerance for conservative views.

They had arranged for a documentary (on India) about a woman whose successfully lobbied for legislation, seeking rights for homos. The woman of course stars in the documentary, which opens with a doctor being ridiculed for treating homosexuality. It elicited laughter from the audience.

Later a Skype session allowed the woman to engage the audience. The woman was initially afraid to face a Pakistani audience (given our image) but this group was the upper crust liberals, and she got emboldened within seconds.

Let's set aside my personal religious beliefs as a Muslim, or lets say let's set aside all religious injunctions, homosexuality, still makes no sense because:

1) Every single gay in the movie and in the audience present, could be identified by "weirdness" in their facial expression and even in their body. They look perverse!!! If it were natural, it couldn't look perverse.

2) why do homosexuals mimic male and female roles, if male-male or female-female attraction is natural?

John said (March 29, 2012):

In re "Not Being Gay is Now a Crime." I have a few experiences similar to the gentlemen below. Overall, I am a friendly, warm individual and I give people the benefit of the doubt. During my undergraduate and graduate years, I encountered many homosexuals, bisexuals, and transgender.

The homosexuals and company took my personality for granted. For instance, my dorm roommate, who was an open homosexual, made advancement. I immediately countered him and he became upset. Our quarrel was not physical, but I did assert myself verbally. I explained to him that he was getting the wrong impression and misreading signals. He proceeded to tell me that I was a "closet homosexual" and "afraid to show" my true self.

Once more, I told him that he had mistaken my friendly, warm, and open personality. "Just because one is friendly, open, and warm does not make him a homosexual!" I yelled. I wanted to request a dorm transfer but I feared hostile response from him and the University for being "homophobic."

This is what heterosexuals are facing and the homosexual, bisexual, and transgender agenda is rapidly progressing. My former roommate tried to use reverse psychology, that is to say, to make me think I was homosexual and afraid to come out, but I did not fall into his trap. The perversion of the natural order ordained by our Creator needs to end fast.

A said (March 29, 2012):

Through work and whilst at university, I became aquainted with a number of colleagues and students who were homosexuals. I happen to be very open-minded and seemed to establish rapport with them naturally. I had even developed strong and meaningful relationships with them-they were the O's amongst the X's and I could identify with that being an O myself through my faith (muslim).

However, I found to my horror that the only reason why they 'accepted' me as their close friend was because they believed I was a closet gay and needed to come out!!! Talk about abusing trust or what? This just reminded me of how the homosexual agenda is all about usurping heterosexual identity. Needless to say, I terminated all of my gay friendly relationships asap.

Tru said (March 29, 2012):

Yes, we are being forced to accept homosexuality as a normal way of life. To me it may be a psychological problem. Most gays that I have come into contact with have almost the same qualities: Low self esteem, unattractiveness(some more than others), low motivation and unhealthiness (Americas poisons; fast food, fake sweeteners, sodas, junk food, etc)...

I think what they need is some more positive motivation in their lives and a clearer mind. With the media, the papers and television all they see is murder, hate and negativity. Then they turn to entertainment and see lesbianism and gay marriage being pushed and guys begin to feel "hey, since I cant pick up any girls because of my looks, or my shyness, or my other flaws maybe I'm gay, and IF I am, so what, there are millions just like me, I'll be fine". It's all in the mind man. They need someone to tell them, "you may not be gay bro, you might just need your spirit lifted".

And how about the people who say(and are satisfied with it)..."They were born gay".. Really? And their lifestyle's and mind's has nothing to do with it right? It's sick.

Marcos said (March 28, 2012):

his is a worldwide orchestrated strategy.

The family unit and the paternal authority are the last resistance to total control by the State. This has nothing to do with the well being of gays.

Marx said plainly that the family should be abolished. Marcuse in 1950 wrote the strategy for the revolution, which was to manipulate groups of blacks, feminists, students and homosexuals.

Here in Brazil, the agenda is in full force:

- Even though the Constitution declares plainly that marriage is between a man and a woman, a Judiciary Coup from the Supreme Court approved civil unions for gays, against the desire of the population and avoiding discussion in the Congress, the only place where it could be lawfully approved.

- Law project PLC122 is being pushed and if it passes, it will send to jail any person who expresses a moral, philosophical or religious view against gay behavior. This article would put a Brazilian Makow in jail.

- A renown Brazilian psychologist is facing expulsion from the Board and prohibition to work because she is successfully treating gays who want to live a heterosexual life.

- A couple of gay men raped continuously a five year boy. After being caught, the State sent four lawyers to defend them. Good luck if you are a common citizen, probably you will not get any.

- Gays have intentionally provoked people in bars and restaurants, "making out" in front of children and clients, so they can sue the owners later if they complain. This gets immense favorable repercussion in the leftist (the whole) press.

- A famous cartoon designer man who likes to cross-dress sometimes just entered the lady's room in a pizzeria, where a little girl was. The mother complained and all the press was backing the crazy old man. You should see his picture, he was beyond ridicule.

The next step in their agenda is the lowering of the age of consent for sex with minors. Wait and see.

Al Thompson said (May 22, 2012):

I never thought of it this way but it makes a lot of sense. This is another good reason to refrain from sex until marriage. There's a good reason for the commandments, and this may a good reason why it should be kept. This lady's explanation makes a lot of sense. It is refreshing to see an article like this because aside about knowing that the commandments exists, it is helpful for people to know why something doesn't work.

Victoria said (May 21, 2012):

I couldn't agree more with Beth. I believe, too, that she has pinpointed the cause of female frigidity, for if one cannot trust one's partner to care for one in all ways, how can one be swept away by an orgasm? When two people are in love and have committed themselves to one another, they should be looking, not at each other, but in the same direction. This is the key to successful relationships.

Both men and women have been sold a bill of goods by a bunch of controlling, obsessive, self-proclaimed 'elites' and it is up to us of the older generations, who have experienced this 'social programming' first hand, to try and get other information across to younger people. Unfortunately, it seems to have to be passed on to other people's children rather than one's own, so successfully has the school system brainwashed children into belittling the wisdom of their own parents. The natural order of things whereby both a father and a mother were provided for all children in order that they might be raised, lovingly, as the parents see fit has been perverted. I would highly advise any of your younger readers who are anticipating becoming parents to research the legal issues surrounding marriage, birth 'registration' and so on. In fact, there was an article pertaining to this on your website only a week or so back. We are beholden to our 'controllers' to get their licenses and registrations only to the degree we succumb to their threats.

So-called 'feminists' are, in my opinion, the most anti-female people of all. They will not rest until women have 'beaten' men at their own game, not seeming to realize that, by so doing, they repudiate much of what is good about themselves. It is now women who push for their daughters to be aggressive and competitive whereas, I suspect, most fathers would be happy to encourage in their daughters the traditional feminine virtues of gentleness, grace, empathy and nurturing. (How about it, dads? You'll probably have to fight your wives for it but aren't your daughters worth it?) We could do worse than to show the very young films of many of the classic movie stars of the 1930's and 40's. Emulating the behavior of women such as Ingrid Bergman, Audrey Hepburn, Ginger Rogers, Donna Reed, and so on could restore many of the feminine graces to the female sex and help to heal our fractured society.

Glenn said (May 21, 2012):

hank you Beth.

Your truth is undisputable.

I sincerely hope you find a like minded man.

All of us, men and women, have been brainwashed to accept sin instead of wholesomeness.

Save the males. Save the females. End the khazarian ashkenazi false-jew zionist Rothschilds from destroying this world in every way.

Bill said (May 21, 2012):

Even though I am a man who has suffered at the hands of a vindictive wife, her lawyer and the unjust family court system, I still find this article compelling. The author is right - women were made to have children. Contraception has negative physical and emotional consequences. Of course, having a baby you cannot afford or do not want has far greater negative consequences!

i find it interesting how she lost all romantic feelings for her partner when she realized he did not have the financial means to support her and her potential child. For her, not having sex until her security needs are met makes perfect sense.

Men and women truly are different creatures. As an idealistic young man, I wanted a marriage that was so loving that 8 children would decorate it forever. After one child, however, I realized that the marriage might not survive and chose to get a vasectomy. Best decision I ever made! My partner became increasing distant and hostile and I could not extricate myself from her emotional or financial abuse through divorce.

So the article is a wonderful insight into the mind and heart of a woman. I wish her well, but... Let this be a warning to men. With vaginal sex comes children and huge financial liabilities. Are you sure that's what you want? If not, either abstain or make sure she cannot get preggy. Don't become her slave.

PS. If this woman was willing to assume the financial responsibility for having sex and children, the whole scenario would change. No man would withhold his seed from her. But as long as she insists on someone else paying for her kids, nothing will change.

Angela said (May 21, 2012):

Beth Mueller makes a lot of sense here, though she doesn’t seem to have the full picture yet.

God designed marriage for the continuation of the human race and He means for sex and procreation to be kept within the bonds and security of marriage. No other way works.

The contraceptive pill as well as masculinising women, has feminised men, and I have heard that boy babies can be feminised by the contraceptive pill taken by their mothers.

There is clear evidence to show that contraception actually raises the abortion statistics.

Lastly the pill is the only medication that I can think of that is designed specifically to make a woman sick, i.e. to turn a healthy fertile woman into a sick infertile woman. People seem to be so completely disorientated as to believe that infertility is a good thing.

Robbie said (May 21, 2012):

As always, God gets it right......

Hebrews 13:4.

Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.

1 Corinthians 6:18.

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

Oliver said (May 21, 2012):

What a condom feels like? Like kissing with a plastic bag in between.

I have witnessed natural (non-chemical, non-hormonal, non-pill, usually cycle related) contraceptive methods work, from the woman´s side, for years. I also doubt, if it could be justifyably called a love relationship, if an "accidental" child would lead to a single parent. I believe love and sex belong together for a functional soul life.

The article brings up many valid points.

Malcolm said (May 21, 2012):

Re Beth’s comment –

“
Save the males...but what about the females? Who can save us? We have to work together to expose the lies and propaganda to start saving each other...”

Any man who is not affected by this plea - is no man at all. Will real men step up to the plate please?