Even Gays Say: Their Behavior is Sick

June 19, 2008


absolut1.jpg

Last week California legalized gay marriage. Why do you suppose the bankers wanted to placate the less than one per cent of the population who are  marriage-minded gays so badly that they are willing to redefine the central life ritual of 96% of the population who are heterosexual? Marriage is a heterosexual institution, mostly about reproduction. It's like saying Muslims have an "equal right" to celebrate Passover. 

The bankers want heterosexuals to suffer from the same gender confusion as homosexuals do, which makes it impossible to bond permanently with the opposite sex. As result, the vast majority of people will substitute promiscuity for love, marriage and family. Eventually the State will take over reproduction and indoctrination of the young. Here is an article I wrote in Nov. 2001 which tears the veil from the "homosexual lifestyle" they pretend is so attractive. (Much more in my book at www.cruelhoax.ca)

----------------------


by Henry Makow Ph.D. 


Imagine that an organism is sick. Imagine that the sick cells convince the organism that they were healthy, and in fact, the healthy cells are sick. The gullible organism would just get sicker and sicker.

This is the relationship between society and homosexuals today. Gays argue that same-sex behavior is no different than being left-handed. On the other hand, they say heterosexual behavior is not natural, but socially conditioned and "oppressive." Heterosexual society and family are taking heavy casualties. Our stupid, opportunistic and craven leaders have betrayed us. We don't even know we are at war.

Let's decide whom, in fact, is sick.

Let's look at gay behavior as defined by two gays, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen Ph.D., authors of "After the Ball: How America will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90's"(1989).

In Chapter Six, they outline "ten categories of misbehavior," drawn from their own experiences, wide reading and thousands of hours of conversation with hundreds of other gays. Their contention is that the male gay lifestyle, (not gay sexuality mind you), "is the pits." They want gays to improve their image by addressing "what is wrong with a lot of gays." (276)

What follows are some highlights. As you read this, ask yourself if there is another human community, including the Mafia that could make these generalizations about itself. Ask yourself if we haven't caught this disease, or at least the sniffles.

  • The authors say "a surprisingly high percentage" of pathological liars and con men are gay. This results from a natural habit of self-concealment, and leads to a stubborn self-deception about one's own gayness and its implication.

  • They say gays tend to reject all forms of morality and value judgments. Gay morality boils down to "I can do whatever I want and you can go to perdition. (If it feels good, I'll do it!)" If a gay feels like seducing a trusted friend's lover, he'll do it, justifying it as an act of "sexual freedom" and the friend be damned.

  • They say gays suffer from a "narcissistic" personality disorder and give this clinical description: "pathological self absorption, a need for constant attention and admiration, lack of empathy or concern for others, quickly bored, shallow, interested in fads, seductive, overemphasis on appearance, superficially charming, promiscuous, exploitative, preoccupied with remaining youthful, relationships alternate between over idealization and devaluation."

  • As an example of this narcissism, the authors say "a very sizable proportion of gay men" who have been diagnosed HIV positive continue to have unprotected sex.

  • They say the majority of gays are extremely promiscuous and self-indulgent. They must continuously up the ante to achieve arousal. This begins with alcohol and drugs and includes such "forbidden" aspects of sex as wallowing in filth (fetishism and coprophilia) and sadomasochism, which involves violence.

  • They say many gays indulge in sex in public bathrooms and think it is antigay harassment when it is stopped. Many think they have a right to importune straight males, including children.

  • Many gays are "single minded sexual predators" fixated on youth and physical beauty alone. When it comes to the old or ugly, gays are "the real queer bashers." Disillusioned themselves, they are cynical about love.

  • "Relationships between gay men don't usually last very long." They quickly tire of their partners and fall victim to temptation. The "cheating ratio of 'married' gay males, given enough time, approaches 100%."

  • Even friendships are based on the sexual test and hard to sustain. Unattractive gay men find it nearly impossible to find a friend, let alone a lover.

  • The authors say gays tend to deny reality in various ways: wishful thinking, paranoia, illogic, emotionalism and embracing crackpot ideas.

Is there any doubt that this behavior is sick? Obviously this is not true of all homosexuals. I feel no malice toward gays. I feel the same way about people who have the flu. I want them to get better and I don't want it to spread.

Unfortunately, even the authors of this book are deceiving themselves. They claim that it is the gay lifestyle and NOT gay sexuality that is "the pits." Who are they kidding? The two are inseparable.

The authors of this book are public relations experts who believe that "our problem is fundamentally one of bad image with straights."

The book details "a comprehensive public-relations campaign that should go a long way towards sanitizing our very unsanitary image:"

"Desensitization": flooding straight America with advertising presenting gays in the "least offensive manner possible."

"Jamming": Advertising that equates fear of gays with hatred of Jews, Blacks and women.

"Conversion": Presenting images of gays that look like regular folks. "The image must be the icon of normality."

They say "it makes no difference that the ads are lies" because "we are using them to...counter negative stereotypes that are every bit as much lies."

This book was written in 1989 and obviously a campaign similar to this has taken effect. Read what the authors say about it:

"By Conversion, we mean something far more profoundly threatening to the American Way of Life [than subversion] ...We mean conversion of the average American's emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media. We mean...to turn their hatred into warm regard whether they like it or not." (153)

Thus gays want Americans to learn that something they naturally and justifiably regard as sick, is in fact healthy. Thus Americans will be defenseless to resist their overtures whether in parks, barracks, bathrooms or classrooms.

It is a measure of the authors' cynicism and self-deception that THEY quote psychologist M. Scott Peck, who in "People of the Lie" characterizes people who suffer from extreme or "malignant" narcissism simply as "evil."

Evil people, Peck says, have "an unshakable will to be right and will not consider the possibility that they are wrong...Their main weapon, interestingly enough is the lie with which they distort reality to look good to themselves, and to confuse others." (297)

The publicity surrounding gay marriage doesn't reflect the reality. Gays don't want to marry. In Canada, gay marriage has been legal for more than a year yet only one in one thousand marriages are homosexual. Gays and lesbians make up about 40 out of 1000 population.

Gay marriage is really designed to make heterosexuals see homosexual behavior as the new normal. They could have designated a separate but equal status for the homosexuals who want marriage.

Gays can continue to fool themselves. But let us stop. Their behavior is sick. And it's contagious.

----

Banker Sponsored Activists Plan to Roll Out Gay Marriage Nationwide in US

see also my "Few Gays Opt to Marry"





Comments for "Even Gays Say: Their Behavior is Sick"

Paul said (June 21, 2008):

I don't get it Henry. Where were you going with this article? It started well, but by the end I read it as an attack on all of us, based on a distaste for those who adopt certain aspects of lifestyle, which I personally don't like and have never been into. I felt like you threw out a huge generalization and passed judgement on all of us as though we are some generic bunch who all act and think the same.

I support most of what you say here, especially about the "normalizing" of the "Gay" lifestyle. There are people calling themselves "Gay" who I'm sure wouldn't if it wasn't being made so easy to do so...as in copping out and accepting irresponsibility. That bothers me, and it damages society ultimately, but equating "Gays" (I actually hate that word you know) with people with the flu?? Fair go! That's your opinion I suppose but its a gross oversimplification of human sexuality. That's where you lost me.

It just isn't that simple and you just get sick of people saying that sort of thing when they have no idea what its like. If its your opinion then...OK, I'm not about to change it. Be that all as it may, you haven't lost me as a reader. I like your stuff as a rule and I've learnt a lot from your writing in the past.

Do you know any online sources of this research you quoted, because it just seems completely alien to my experience. They'd all die of exhaustion before they died of AIDS surely. Maybe not being American, We don't see the over the top hedonism you see over there. (I'm not from Sydney either!)
---
Paul,

I didn't mean to imply that every single homosexual is like this and I will add a sentence to the article on my site to make that clear. Also, I did imply that the majority of heterosexuals are now leaning in this direction.

Henry


John said (June 21, 2008):


Well, yes. But look at it from the viewpoint of the promoters of "the gay life style". Recall that a prime goal of the moneyed elite is to reduce world population to 500 million and keep it there for the long term viability of human civilization. 2 people of the same gender can't reproduce. So to prevent the birth of a human baby is preferable than to have it born and die later by starvation or violence.

I guess what I'm trying to say they wish to preserve their dominance (and non renewable mineral wealth) in the most cost efficient way possible. It's easier and less expensive to control 500 million than it is 7 billion.


William said (June 21, 2008):

In California, for years, Gays have had the right to file for a "Domestic Partnership" status which confers as many rights as marriage to the partners but without ceremony or fees etc. In fact they may have slightly greater rights under this law.

Oddly, heterosexuals are forbidden to use this
category unless they are over age 62!

So even with the rights having already been bestowed upon them, they still went for Gay Marriage. This indicates a hidden agenda to me, as you indicate in your recent column.

I also wonder if the gay marriages are legal when the couple is already of the "Domestic
Partners" status?

Thanks for the continuing enlightenment.


Tim said (June 21, 2008):

I've always found, that when gays, etc., start slamming reproduction, normal sex/marriages, etc., stating the obvious, that it is too bad their parents didn't feel that way, tends to shut their pieholes!


O said (June 21, 2008):

Dr. Makow,

Historians describe a practice in ancient Greece, well understood and accepted in “mainstream history” where the power-elite would practice such things as to ensure a percentage of males would become homosexuals- thereby becoming less threatening to their power.

Same story- same thing. Its not just about break-up- its male power. Its power, simple, and its a way to lessen it.

Its sick.


CM said (June 21, 2008):

Hi Mr. Makow,

Unfortunately, today's article regarding homosexuals is right on target. I have worked in predominantly homosexual workplaces and though I respect and like gays as individuals, there is no doubt in my mind that they suffer from a severe gender disorder and have no conception of true womanhood, femininity or the male quivalents.Some do understand the opposite sex very, very well but rarely their own sex except in sexual matters.

I lost an intensely feminine friend to lesbianism. The day she came out I felt like she had died and I still mourn the loss. I've noticed the intense narcissism most in male gays and for that reason do not encourage anything more than acquaintanceship. One gay friend I had "jokingly" warned me that if he found any of my male friends attractive he was going to hit on them rgardless of whether we were acquaintances or engaged to be married. I know the girlfriend was terrorized by a mentally ill father who was the only adult male image in her childhood. I know the gay friend's father was very distant and forbiding.

By the same token, I do believe that some people are born with sexual disorders in which either the brain is male or female and the body is the opposite (transvestites) or chemical imbalances in that their bodies are one sex but they have a large amount of hormones of the opposite sex that affects their genitalia, sex drive, and possibly their sexual orientation (this may be the only group that is truly bisexual, the rest seem to be highly addicted to sexual pleasure or lack self control and and are willing to achieve sexual pleasure by means that the average person would not seriously consider) This group is a bit more complicated and seem to have legitimate medical disorders that may require surgery or hormone treatments. But I gather that this group is not the group your article refers to.

I found this article that may interest you.

http://www.catholicexchange.com/2008/06/19/112901/


Sonia said (June 20, 2008):

As usual, Henry, you're so correct in your assessment of homosexuals. I've known a few, and yes, they are as you describe.

Furthermore, you did not go far enough -- I guess you believe the public (dummies) would find it unpalatable and unbelieveable what really goes on with their "parties" "parades" "bath houses" "one night stands" "how many times can one have the 'clap'? and other perversions that even I can't reiterate.

I no longer mention the unmentionables because sheeple don't believe it and think I'm, yeah, you guessed it, a homophobe!!!! Surprise, that. Actually, I've been very good friends with these homosexuals and I've gotten the scoop from the horses' mouth. But just because I'm friends, doesn't make me blind and fearful I might catch the clap if I use their bathroom!!!

But Henry, we all know we're on the Titanic and perhaps it's exactly what we need -- a real cleansing provided the same type assholes don't survive to "lead" the people again. I think it's a DNA thing -- injected into humankind ------ destined to repeat and repeat and repeat and ...................

I'm extremely depressed and irritable ---- and not too many dummies know what's really going on. I REFUSE to speak of the current dog and pony show and I get funny looks when I mention the republicruds/republic-rats and no difference between the 3 'candidates' --- but like the rats in a maze, they all intend to "go and do their duty as citizens of this 'free' country" because we need "change" --- and "if we don't vote, we shouldn't complain" ---- barf

I can't stand it


HR said (June 20, 2008):

You know Henry,

I really like and keep up with your New World Order research. It is spot on, and well researched

But I get tired of this crap about gays. It's really none of your frigging business what other people do with their private lives.

If these people had not been harassed historically for their 'preferences' or what ever theory you hold about that, there wouldn't be this backlash.

My younger brother is gay. He has been gay since he was a kid...its just that way. Nobody can talk you into it, nobody can talk you out of it.

What is 'sex'? Do you really know? a million different people a million different answers--if they aren't affraid to tell the truth.

People like you and Davy Kidd, give me the creeps.
All this talk about freedom!
But only from your moralistic high horse attitude.

I'll tell you what "sick" is, your know it all attitude. You make me sick.

Live and let live...and don't tread on me.

-----

Dear HR

The gay life model is being sold to heterosexuals and heterosexuals have a right to know the truth about it. I'm all for live-and- let- live but heterosexuals are being re-engineered. Most gays who write to me can't see beyond their narrow self interest and amour-propre.

Henry


Dan said (June 20, 2008):

Yeah, the plethora of gay and lesbian newly'wed' interviews talking like Ozzie and Harriet all of a sudden doesn't ring true with the attitudes I've heard from gays and lesbians before. They always referred to children as a kind of vermin, to marriage as another form of 'oppression'.

Joke's on them too. You said it, this is what it's all about: "Eventually the State will take over reproduction and indoctrination of the young."

KPFT Pacifica Houston (people call it 'gay-PFT' around here) and NPR (national socialist public radio) blew the trumpets all week on the California gay 'marriage' stories. Full of tear jerking (and circle jerking) 'human interest' tales of homos and lesbians in a land where 'love was against the law', and they were denied their human right to raise children. We know how much they always loved kids.

The lesbian bull dyke recently married to her wife ('Butch') sounded like any young mother-to-be, first the love, then the marriage, and now they get to have (somebody else's) kids! "Mom is so happy...she always thought she'd never have grandchildren...."

This is phoney. Lesbians I overheard talking in groups at school back in the 80's coined the term, "rug rats" to begin with. The feminist (lesbian) movement were the very ones who heavily condemned motherhood to begin with. Home maker was equated with 'lazy' or 'prostitute' or 'victim'.

Let us not forget the 80's marriage wrecking ball buzz term, 'co-dependence'. If you had anything like a marital relationship involving fidelity and commitment, it was a personality disorder called 'co-dependence'. That term hasn't come up since the gay marriage agenda popped up out of nowhere.

One angle Sunday on NPR's morning shows was about problems gays and lesbians now face -- divorce! "What if you move to another 'non gay friendly' state, and want a divorce? Who gets custody of the kiddies? What's a gay mother to do?


Christine said (June 20, 2008):

Hi Henry,

The Desert Father Abba Anthony predicted that "'in the future, men would go mad. And when they come upon a sane man, they will attack him saying 'you are mad - you are not one of us."'

With the advent of state sanctioned sodomy, I believe we have reached that point. NO culture has survived the endorsement of the sin of Sodom.

Christine


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at