Feminists Hatch "Rape Crisis" On Campus

October 15, 2009

phone.jpg
by Heather MacDonald

(Originally, "The Campus Rape Myth"
From "City Journal" Winter 2008
Abridged)


It's a lonely job,
working the phones at a college rape crisis center. Day after day, you wait for the casualties to show up from the alleged campus rape epidemic--but no one calls.

Could this mean that the crisis is overblown? No: according to the campus sexual-assault industry, it means that the abuse of co-eds is worse than anyone had ever imagined. It means that consultants and counselors need more funding to persuade student rape victims to break the silence of their suffering.

The campus rape movement highlights the current condition of radical feminism, from its self-indulgent bathos to its embrace of ever more vulnerable female victimhood. But the movement is an even more important barometer of academia itself. In a delicious historical irony, the baby boomers who dismantled the university's intellectual architecture in favor of unbridled sex and protest have now bureaucratized both.

While women's studies professors bang pots and blow whistles at anti-rape rallies, in the dorm next door, freshman counsellors and deans pass out tips for better orgasms and the use of sex toys. The academic bureaucracy is roomy enough to sponsor both the dour anti-male feminism of the college rape movement and the promiscuous hook-up culture of student life. The only thing that doesn't fit into the university's new commitments is serious scholarly purpose.

BOGUS STATS

The campus rape industry's central tenet is that one-quarter of all college girls will be raped or be the targets of attempted rape by the end of their college years (completed rapes outnumbering attempted rapes by a ratio of about three to two). The girls' assailants are not terrifying strangers grabbing them in dark alleys but the guys sitting next to them in class or at the cafeteria.

This claim, first published in Ms. magazine in 1987, took the universities by storm. By the early 1990s, campus rape centres and 24-hour hotlines were opening across the country, aided by tens of millions of dollars of federal funding. Victimhood rituals sprang up: first the Take Back the Night rallies, in which alleged rape victims reveal their stories to gathered crowds of candle-holding supporters; then the Clothesline Project, in which T-shirts made by self-proclaimed rape survivors are strung on campus, while recorded sounds of gongs and drums mark minute-by-minute casualties of the "rape culture." A special rhetoric emerged: victims' family and friends were "co-survivors"; "survivors" existed in a larger "community of survivors."

An army of salesmen took to the road, selling advice to administrators on how to structure sexual-assault procedures, and lecturing freshmen on the "undetected rapists" in their midst. Rape bureaucrats exchanged notes at such gatherings as the Inter Ivy Sexual Assault Conferences and the New England College Sexual Assault Network. Organizations like One in Four and Men Can Stop Rape tried to persuade college boys to redefine their masculinity away from the "rape culture." The college rape infrastructure shows no signs of a slowdown. In 2006, for example, Yale created a new Sexual Harassment and Assault Resources and Education Center, despite numerous resources for rape victims already on campus.

If the one-in-four statistic is correct--it is sometimes modified to "one-in-five to one-in-four"--campus rape represents a crime wave of unprecedented proportions. No crime, much less one as serious as rape, has a victimization rate remotely approaching 20 or 25 percent, even over many years. The 2006 violent crime rate in Detroit, one of the most violent cities in America, was 2,400 murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults per 100,000 inhabitants--a rate of 2.4 percent.

The one-in-four statistic would mean that every year, millions of young women graduate who have suffered the most terrifying assault, short of murder, that a woman can experience. Such a crime wave would require nothing less than a state of emergency--Take Back the Night rallies and 24-hour hotlines would hardly be adequate to counter this tsunami of sexual violence. Admissions policies letting in tens of thousands of vicious criminals would require a complete revision, perhaps banning boys entirely. The nation's nearly 10 million female undergrads would need to take the most stringent safety precautions. Certainly, they would have to alter their sexual behavior radically to avoid falling prey to the rape epidemic.

None of this crisis response occurs, of course--because the crisis doesn't exist. During the 1980s, feminist researchers committed to the rape-culture theory had discovered that asking women directly if they had been raped yielded disappointing results--very few women said that they had been. So Ms. commissioned University of Arizona public health professor Mary Koss to develop a different way of measuring the prevalence of rape. Rather than asking female students about rape per se, Koss asked them if they had experienced actions that she then classified as rape. Koss's method produced the 25 percent rate, which Ms. then published.

THE RAPE VICTIM WHO ISN'T

Koss's study had serious flaws. Her survey instrument was highly ambiguous, as University of California at Berkeley social-welfare professor Neil Gilbert has pointed out. But the most powerful refutation of Koss's research came from her own subjects: 73 percent of the women whom she characterized as rape victims said that they hadn't been raped. Further--though it is inconceivable that a raped woman would voluntarily have sex again with the fiend who attacked her--42 percent of Koss's supposed victims had intercourse again with their alleged assailants.

All subsequent feminist rape studies have resulted in this discrepancy between the researchers' conclusions and the subjects' own views. A survey of sorority girls at the University of Virginia found that only 23 percent of the subjects whom the survey characterized as rape victims felt that they had been raped--a result that the university's director of Sexual and Domestic Violence Services calls "discouraging." Equally damning was a 2000 campus rape study conducted under the aegis of the Department of Justice. Sixty-five percent of what the feminist researchers called "completed rape" victims and three-quarters of "attempted rape" victims said that they did not think that their experiences were "serious enough to report." The "victims" in the study, moreover, "generally did not state that their victimization resulted in physical or emotional injuries," report the researchers.

None of the obvious weaknesses in the research has had the slightest drag on the campus rape movement, because the movement is political, not empirical.....

Some student rebels are ... organizing in favor of sexual restraint. Such newly created campus groups as the Love and Fidelity Network and the True Love Revolution advocate an alternative to the rampant regret sex of the hookup scene: wait until marriage. Their message would do more to return a modicum of manners to campus male--and female--behavior than endless harangues about the rape culture ever could.

Maybe these young iconoclasts can take up another discredited idea: college is for learning. The adults in charge have gone deaf to the siren call of beauty that for centuries lured people to the classics. But fighting male dominance or catering to the libidinal impulses released in the 1960s are sorry substitutes for the pursuit of knowledge. The campus rape and sex industries are signs of how hollow the university has become.

Heather Mac Donald is a contributing editor of City Journal and the John M. Olin Fellow at the Manhattan Institute. Her most recent book, coauthored with Victor Davis Hanson and Steven Malanga, is The Immigration Solution.

---
RELATED: Makow -- "Domestic Violence Hysteria is Political"
-------



Comments for "Feminists Hatch "Rape Crisis" On Campus"

Michael said (October 16, 2009):

This article, like many others you have written, point out peculiar behaviors typified by various feminist groups. I cant help but notice that these behaviors are very similar to those exhibited by politicians, courts, police, just about every special interest group.

In courts as in politics as in feminism etc, claims carry the same weight as evidenced accusations, leaving the accused to defend themselves merely on unsubstantiated claims. The very reason for so much domestic violence litigation, a financial windfall of course.

Much like every woman I have ever had a relationship with, a lie is not a lie, its a position that you must disprove. In court its called a legal position. However the more people that believe the lie, (by being told the lie by the liar in the first place) the lie then becomes truth. As an example, when a woman makes an allegation, it is always after she has told as many people as possible and then rally all those who wish to crusade on her behalf. This is the fist indication that a female is lying.

Another aspect of the female lie, which I feel this article strongly identifies, is that if one does not believe and support the lie than that person doesn't love the liar. This sounds familiar with so many different groups. Shall I name a few? I didn't think so.

In closing, many years ago I watched a Tommy Hilfiger interview. Being continually pressed on where he gets his inspiration etc, Tommy replied several times in a similar way, "I don't need to be inspired, women buy anything, I just have to put my name on it, they will just buy anything." Ill point out that this is all he said in the interview, forcing the interview to be cut short, he didn't have anything else to say. The interviewer was a Charlie Rose I believe on PBS.

Thats what I came to say, Women will buy anything, its the packaging that counts. Could it be that women are buying packaged ideas as well? I think we know that answer.

In a world where marketing and managing systems(ideas) are bought and sold as tangible commodities (Oprah), it doesn't take that much of a leap of the imagination to see women standing in line waiting to buy new ideas for the fall calendar. The ideas that will be most popular this season will be the better packaged variety.


Lesley said (October 16, 2009):

After reading your last few articles, I feel so sad! It seems that so many men (Tony, for example,

"And as I get older and see more I might add: To hell with them, they're worthless by the time "education" is done with them") really dislike women, mostly Western women. My ex- husband echoes the same sentiments about women, "Western women are worthless and they won't stand by their men".

We've all been duped Henry. I started dating in the mid-seventies and eighties. I didn't know what I was doing. And for the most part; I was an angry young woman who felt men only used and abused women. I was really confused on the roles for men and women. I did not know what my role was. I knew I didn't want to be like my subservient mother who was not treated well by my father. Confusion and dysfunction reigned in the dating scene.

Just like today's young women do not know what they are doing. We are all just looking for love and acceptance in a messed up, socially engineered world. I am no longer angry at men and take them as they come. Have a little mercy guys....all women, or all Western women are not useless wastrels....most of us heterosexual women are just confused, and lonely and want male companionship, contrary to what it may look like. I know I was brainwashed by the times....this fighting between the sexes is all such a useless waste of time.

We need some new rules Henry. Or just maybe they are the old rules. are they are the old rules.


Dan said (October 16, 2009):

The following hits the point:

"While women's studies professors bang pots and blow whistles at anti-rape rallies, in the dorm next door, freshman counselors and deans pass out tips for better orgasms and the use of sex toys. The academic bureaucracy is roomy enough to sponsor both the dour anti-male feminism of the college rape movement and the promiscuous hook-up culture of student life."

The Marx/Engels twist on Hegelian dialectic trick in action. Everyone must learn to recognize this. When you see 'revolutionary' behavior pushed by the same bunch howling crisis because of the consequences and pointing the finger at somebody else.

Consider that rape was non-existent on college campuses before co-ed dorms and feminism on campus. Also pregnancy (and abortions) were nil on college campuses and certainly nil for high schools, immediately prior to the joint feminist/gay-lesbian/sex revolutions deployed on campuses of the 1960's. Rape, abortion, dysfunctional (single parent or orphaned) families have grown exponentially with the assimilation of these values in society under aegis of the feminist/gay-lesbian/socialists Establishment.


Tony said (October 15, 2009):

In response to your campus rape article:

If learning is the purpose of college, return to men's and women's colleges to cut out the horseplay and get down to work.

In response to the "why young men are avoiding marriage" article - which pretty much tells it like it is -

I repeat for the umpteenth time: Western women (maybe most all women now) are out of place and out of control.

And as I get older and see more I might add: To hell with them, they're worthless by the time "education" is done with them.


Antoinette said (October 15, 2009):

To Lorna (and any other young ladies reading along),

Do yourself a favor and pick up the book "The Rules" by Ellen Fein and Sherri Schneider. This dating classic, hated by feminists, helps the female dater who's been chronically "used" by the opposite sex and brainwashed by feminazi's. I was one of these girls. The book taught me how to pre-qualify men as dogs or princes by their behaviors. Thus I was able to identify a user and stop wasting time on him. At the same time, the book helps you re-learn how to act feminine in a positive (non-neurotic) way in order keep the good ones. At 32, 2 years after reading the book and practicing the principals, I married a great guy who has remained a great guy for the last 8 years. Yes, there are dogs out there; but the problem isn't them. The problem is that you are unable to objectively identify the terds and run away in time to avoid being used (believe me the clues are ALWAYS there). Good luck!


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at