Feminists Reclaim "Slut" Moniker
April 11, 2011
Why do feminists want to make being a slut respectable?by Henry Makow Ph.D.
"A woman has a right to wear what she wants, without her appearance becoming an excuse for sexual assault."
That was the message Sunday afternoon at the Ottawa SlutWalk, according to today's Ottawa Citizen.
"The walk consisted of a march from the Women's Monument in Minto Park to the human rights monument in front of the Elgin Street courthouse, with some chanting "Slut slut; Ho ho; Yes means yes; And no means no."
The event was a response to remarks made by a Toronto police officer who told a student group that one of the things women should do to protect themselves from rape is to avoid dressing like "sluts."
Toronto had the first "Slut-Walk" a week ago. Others are in the works in U.S. cities, and the story has received news coverage as far afield as New Zealand.
The event's name has sparked some controversy, of course.
Natalie Davis, 22, (pictured above) explained that consent must be explicit. In her mind, the word "slut" is a positive term. This is a conscious effort, she said, to take control of the word, in the same way that the word "queer" has been reclaimed by the gay community.
"I want to embrace the word 'slut' as somebody who is sexually responsible and aware, whether I have one or a hundred partners," Davis said.
"To me a slut is someone who can say yes or no -and just because I identify as a slut that doesn't mean I say yes to everybody. To me a slut is just somebody who is in charge of their own body and in charge of their own sexuality."
Makow comment:
The elite is staging false flag terror attacks like 9-11 as a pretext to erect a world police state.
Feminists are taking to the barricades!
What are they protesting? The subversion of democracy? Tyranny?
No. They're demonstrating for the right to behave like sluts.
Is there any better proof that feminists are puppets of the elite?
When their brainwash victims extol degrading and self-destructive behavior, is there any doubt that the elite is satanic? (Satanism inverts good and evil.)
Why do feminists want to make sluts respectable?
BF (i.e. Before Feminism) women consecrated sex for marriage and family. Children were the fruit of the love between a husband and wife. A woman accepted her husband's spirit (seed) and gave birth to a child that projected them both into the future.
A woman's natural need to love and be loved was fulfilled. She was cherished and protected for as long as she lived.
Thanks to Feminism, women have learned that this was very "oppressive." (Did they ever suspect they were being sabotaged?)
Now, they no longer have to endure love and courtship. Like many homosexuals, they don't even have to know their sex partner.
They can get inebriated and hop into the sack with the first guy that strikes their fancy.
But -- he had better make sure she doesn't change her mind, because if she does, then that's rape!
And if he dumps her afterward, that's the price of anonymous sex, which is really great and worth it.
And if she gets old and fat, and is lonely or destitute, that's great too.
She'll always have an old dog-eared copy of "The Feminine Mystique" to remind her why.
So don't say they're sluts.
Say they're "liberated."
They're "independent women."
OK, they admit they're sluts, but that must be a good thing.
Because they're WOMEN, and after centuries of oppression, what they say is always true.
And don't say they're stupid.
Because if slut is good, stupid is even better.
anon said (April 12, 2011):
Perhaps we're witnessing the progressive movement from having sex with only spouse/boyfriend, into a domain where a womans' private parts become a public utility. How sad.
--
reply:
Yes, this has always been the Illuminati vision of women. Nationalization of women's sexuality. Destruction of marriage, family and private property (yours not theirs).
Of course, men do not marry sluts. They want women who are monogamous and faithful, so they will know they are raising their own children.
H