Archeological Finds Debunk Darwinism

March 10, 2010

forbiddenarch.jpgHumans Inhabited Earth for Millions of Years

Masons Try to Suppress Evidence

"Anatomically modern humans have been present on the Earth not just for 100,000 years or less (the orthodox version), but for millions of years, and that metal objects of advanced design have been in use at equally early periods."


by Cornelius B
(for henrymakow.com)


The model of human prehistory built-up by scholars over the past two centuries is sadly and completely wrong, and a deliberate tool of disinformation and mind control.

This is the thesis of the book, "Forbidden Archaeology" by Michael Cremo and Richard L. Thompson.

The authors begin with the assumption that archeologists are fundamentally of good faith. Nevertheless, little by little, they demonstrate a systematic destruction of proofs that show another reality than that the official story. Falsifications and even destruction of such proofs has been common for more than two hundred years.

In their first essay "The Hidden History of the Human Race", Cremo and Thompson push back our horizons not just thousand years, but millions of years into the past, and show that almost everything we have been taught to believe about the origins and evolution of our species rests on a highly selective sampling of research.

The two authors then set the record straight by showing all the other research results that have been edited out, not because there was anything wrong about them, but simply because "they did not fit with prevailing academic opinion."

Anomalous and out-of-place discoveries reported by Cremo and Thompson in "The Hidden History of the Human Race" include convincing evidence that anatomically modern humans have been present on the Earth not just for 100,000 years or less (the orthodox version), but for millions of years, and that metal objects of advanced design have been in use at equally early periods.


SCIENTIFIC CENSORSHIP


The authors describe an ongoing social process of knowledge filtration that at first sight appears quite innocuous, but has a substantial cumulative effect. Certain categories of evidence simply disappear from view.

This pattern of data suppression has been going on for a long time. For instance, in 1880, J. D. Whitney, the state geologist of California, published a lengthy review of advanced stone tools found in California gold mines. The implements, including spear points and stone mortars and pestles, were found deep in mine shafts, underneath thick, undisturbed layers of lava, in formations ranging from 9 million to over 55 million years old.

W. H. Holmes of the Smithsonian Institution, one of the most vocal critics of these California finds, wrote:

"Perhaps if Professor Whitney had fully appreciated the story of human evolution as it is understood today, he would have hesitated to announce the conclusions formulated (that humans existed in very ancient times in North America), notwithstanding the imposing array of testimony with which he was confronted."

In other words, if the facts do not agree with the favored theory, then such facts, even an imposing array of them, must be discarded.

I shall give here some examples of these discarded paleo-archaeological elements:

In a report delivered to the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1881, H. Slopes, F.G.S. (Fellow of the Geological Society), described a shell, the surface of which bore a carving of a crude but unmistakably human face. The carved shell was found in the stratified deposits of the Red Crag, which is between 2.0 and 2.5 million years old.

One should keep in mind that in terms of conventional paleontological opinion, one does not encounter such works of art until the time of fully modern Cro-Magnon man in the Late Pleistocene, about 30,000 years ago. 

On August 2, 1890, J. H. Neale signed the following statement about discoveries made by him:

"In 1877 Mr. J. H. Neale was superintendent of the Montezuma Tunnel Company, and ran the Montezuma tunnel into the gravel underlying the lava of Table Mountain, Tuolumne County. . . . At a distance of between 1400 and 1500 feet from the mouth of the tunnel, or of between 200 and 300 feet beyond the edge of the solid lava, Mr. Neale saw several spear-heads, of some dark rock and nearly one foot in length.

On exploring further, he himself found a small mortar three or four inches in diameter and of irregular shape. This was discovered within a foot or two of the spear-heads. He then found a large well formed pestle, now the property of Dr. R. I. Bromley, and near by a large and very regular mortar, also at present the property of Dr. Bromley."

Neale's affidavit continued:

"All of these relics were found. . . . close to the bed-rock, perhaps within a foot of it. Mr. Neale declares that it is utterly impossible that these relics can have reached the position in which they were found excepting at the time the gravel was deposited, and before the lava cap formed. There was not the slightest trace of any disturbance of the mass or of any natural fissure into it by which access could have been obtained either there or in the neighborhood."

The position of the artifacts in gravel close to the bedrock at Tuolumne Table Mountain indicates they were 33-55 million years old. 

In 1844, Sir David Brewster reported that a nail had been discovered firmly embedded in a block of sandstone from the Kingoodie (Mylnfield) Quarry in Scotland. Dr. A. W. Medd of the British Geological Survey wrote to the authors in 1985 that this sandstone is of "Lower Old Red Sandstone age" (Devonian, between 360 and 408 million years old). Brewster was a famous Scottish physicist. He was a founder of the British Association for the Advancement of Science and made important discoveries in the field of optics.

In his report to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Brewster stated:

"The stone in Kingoodie quarry consists of alternate layers of hard stone and a soft clayey substance called 'till'; the courses of stone vary from six inches to upwards of six feet in thickness. The particular block in which the nail was found, was nine inches thick, and in proceeding to clear the rough block for dressing, the point of the nail was found projecting about half an inch (quite eaten with rust) into the 'till,' the rest of the nail lying along the surface of the stone to within an inch of the head, which went right down into the body of the stone."

The fact that the head of the nail was buried in the sandstone block would seem to rule out the possibility the nail had been pounded into the block after it was quarried. 

On June 22, 1844, this curious report appeared in the London Times:

"A few days ago, as some workmen were employed in quarrying a rock close to the Tweed about a quarter of a mile below Rutherford-mill, a gold thread was discovered embedded in the stone at a depth of eight feet."

Dr. A. W. Medd of the British Geological Survey wrote to the authors in 1985 that this stone is of Early Carboniferous age (between 320 and 360 million years old).

(Ed. Note: Cornelius B cites many more examples which I excised in the interest of brevity.)


DISINFORMATION AND MIND CONTROL


"Forbidden Archeology" was first released in 1993 and quickly became an underground classic. Today it is a bestseller, with foreign editions in over a dozen languages, presenting both accepted and anomalous scientific evidence defying the traditional view of human evolution. This is a fascinating intellectual excavation of a vast store of hidden knowledge.

I'll let you judge their proofs sustaining the human evolution. What is the purpose behind this disinformation if not mind control, and therefore social engineering?

Science is a method that anyone can learn and apply. In a free and open society, science has to be a democratic process. Instead, we observe a behavior similar to the totalitarian attitude of the ancient priesthood clique in Egypt. To better illustrate this affirmation, I present the case of a science journalist, Richard Milton, initially an ardent believer in Darwinian doctrine until his investigative instincts kicked in one day.

After 20 years of studying and writing about evolution, he suddenly realized that there were many disconcerting elements in the theory. He decided to put every main classic proof of Darwinism to the test. The results were hard to believe -- he found that the theory could not even stand up to the rigors of routine investigative journalism. Next, he published a book titled "The Facts of Life: Shattering the Myths of Darwinism".

Milton says:

"I experienced the witch-hunting activity of the Darwinist police at first hand - it was deeply disappointing to find myself being described by a prominent Oxford zoologist, Richard Dawkins, as "loony", "stupid" and "in need of psychiatric help" in response to purely scientific reporting."

Does this sound like stories that came out of the Soviet Union 25 years ago when dissident scientists there started speaking out?

Without a doubt Dawkins is part of the "secret societies brotherhood" invested with high power. Richard Dawkins has been appointed to the position of Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. This advocate of aetheism is a classic "Brain Police" storm-trooper, patrolling the neurological front lines. 

According to Milton, the process came to a head when the London Times Higher Education Supplement commissioned him to write a critique of Darwinism. The publication foreshadowed his coming piece: "Next Week: Darwinism - Richard Milton goes on the attack". Dawkins caught wind of this and wasted no time in nipping this heresy in the bud. He contacted the editor, Auriol Stevens, and accused Milton of being a "creationist", and prevailed upon Stevens to pull the plug on the article. Milton learned of this behind-the-scenes backstabbing and wrote a letter of appeal to Stevens. In the end, she caved in to Dawkins and scratched the piece. 
 

DARWINISM AS MIND CONTROL

The Western scientific establishment and mass media pride themselves on being open public forums devoid of prejudice or censorship. However, no television program examining the flaws and weaknesses of Darwinism has ever been aired in Darwin's home country or in America. A scientist who opposes the theory cannot get a paper published.

Darwin's theory of evolution is the only theory routinely taught in our public school system that has never been subjected to rigorous scrutiny; nor have any of the criticisms been allowed into the curriculum. This is an interesting fact, because a recent poll showed that "71% of the American public say biology teachers should teach both Darwinism and scientific evidence against Darwinian theory." Nevertheless, there are no plans to implement this balanced approach. 
 
Then there is the high-profile case of Dr Virginia Steen-McIntyre, a geologist working for the US Geological Survey (USGS), who was dispatched to an archaeological site in Mexico to date a group of artifacts in the 1970s. This travesty also illustrates how far the « brothers scientists" will go to guard orthodox tenets. 
 
McIntyre used state-of-the-art equipment and backed up her results by using four different methods, but her results were off the chart. The lead archaeologist expected a date of 25,000 years or less, and the geologist's finding was 250,000 years or more. 
 
The figure of 25,000 years or less was critical to the Bering Strait "crossing" theory, and it was the motivation behind the head archaeologist's tossing Steen-McIntyre's results in the circular file and asking for a new series of dating tests. This sort of reaction does not occur when dates match the expected chronological model that supports accepted theories. 
 
Steen-McIntyre was given a chance to retract her conclusions, but because this woman was intellectually honest, she refused. She found it hard thereafter to get her papers published and she lost a teaching job at an American university.
 


CONCLUSION

Thus, as we may conclude from the information provided here, Darwinism, the theory of the survival of the fittest and its twin sister, the theory of human evolution, together with the official version of the Paleontology and Archaeology such as they are practiced, are pseudo-sciences.

In fact, they are tools for mind control of the masses. Their main purpose is to cut off the roots of the true history of humanity, and promote a naturalistic and mechanistic view of life as "survival of the fittest." They promote atheism as a means of destroying Christian civilization.

We find the same hate of God and of Christianity in Marxism and Freudianism.

A very interesting read is the book of Richard Wurmbrand "Marx & Satan" where we discover that Marx was a Satanist priest with a deep hate of God and desire for the ruin and annihilation of the human society. How can we explain this deep hated nourished in the hearts of these men? Was it satanic possession?

I will close with this fact -- at the funerals of Karl Marx, in his speech Frederich Engels compared Marx to Darwin as titans of the human mind, and this suggests the high probability that Darwin was Karl Marx's "Luciferian brother".







Comments for "Archeological Finds Debunk Darwinism"

Michael said (March 12, 2010):

Here is a quick way to disprove evolution right from the beginning:

If the first cells somehow emerged 'by accident' out of some primordial 'soup' of elements, how would they "know", at the DNA level, how to reproduce ? How might it be possible for those theoretical first cells to have fully functional reproductive DNA, if they were "born" by accident ? Why didn't they just die ?

God created the world -not- so that we can learn to live apart from Him, but so that we might learn to love Him forever in the next life, after the Resurrection. We are here to make that choice; if we make the right one, He will help us the rest of the way, despite our weaknesses, through Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Most Holy Mother. In the meantime, as long as we exist in this state, (of continuous change) in this life, we will not "fall like lightning" as Lucifer did when he rebelled against God, because we were born without a full knowledge of God. The time we have here, "veiled" in the "clay" of creation, restrains the inexorable justice of God towards us while we struggle to form our souls. When we are free of our mortal coil, the judgement falls immediately. Prayer to God, especially through Jesus (His Son) and Mary (His Mother), Who intercede on our behalf before the Father in Heaven, is neglected at our own peril.


Dmitri said (March 12, 2010):

Theory of Evolution was one page of speculation:


When considering evolution, the first thing to do is to consider the professional relationship that existed between Charles Darwin and Charles Lyell, who both lived in the West Midlands of England during the earlier part of the nineteenth century. Both came from well to do families, received higher education, but not in science; so it has to be concluded that Darwin was an amateur biologist, and Lyell was an amateur geologist, both self-taught. Thus, Darwin not only wrote Origin of Species, Lyell also wrote Principles of Geology. It was Lyell who gave Darwin the idea of a much older earth than earlier thought.

The next thing to consider is that the rank of species is almost at the bottom of the biological table, and this is why there are so many thousands of them, coming and going all the time. Thus, when Darwin used the word Origin, he knew that this was applicable only to the very low rank of Species. This means that all five hundred pages of Darwin's book concern the parallel principle of Adaptation, and at the species level. For example, the aardvarks with the longer snouts are going to gradually prevail, because they are catching more ants.

Darwin, without explicitly referring to his colleague Lyell, wrote only one page on the then completely new idea of a much older earth than previously thought, and he then speculated that, since Adaptation cannot occur at levels higher than the species level, maybe the higher classifications in the biological table came about by sheer accident, what with all the additional time now available for this to perhaps happen. This is not a theory. This is nothing more than mere speculation; on only one page of a five hundred page book.


Gary said (March 11, 2010):

It should not be surprising how far the Illuminati will go to try to discredit belief in God. I guess it is part of their "order out of chaos" methodology, they try to tear down belief in the God of the Bible to try to replace it with their new age "god".

Romans 1:20-22 - For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

Romans 1:28 - And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind...

http://kenraggio.com/KRPN-Mars.htm http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/

http://www.creationdefense.org/ http://www.csama.org/

Honest research will show that true science will support belief that there had to be an intelligent creator. Isn't it amazing that many of the same people who scoff at the God and His Word, will believe far out theories like evolution that require much more faith than reason to believe when you consider the extreme lack of reliable evidence for such theories.


Dan H said (March 11, 2010):

A point not yet made regarding this article is that it proves that the dating schemes are all wrong.

There is no way human intelligence existed for millions of years and we have only now arrived at our current technological-level and population size today. Given the level of technology observed in these anomalous finds, humanity would have reached far higher levels of technology than is observed today over just 100,000 years. You have to invoke numerous, imaginary advances and catastrophes over those millions of years with all evidence being wiped out but with a re-populating, remnant surviving each time for the time-frames to be plausible. Such a thing might happen once or maybe twice, but not the hundreds of times it would need to have happened over even 1 million years. The imagined time-frames are simply make-believe.


Jerry said (March 11, 2010):

I hope all is well with you and thank you for stirring things up! I've been a general contractor since 1972 and five years into my career I received a phone call from my excavator asking me to come to the excavation site stating he had a bit of problem that I had to address. He was excavating for a house foundation on the west side of downtown Cincinnati.

When I arrived Bobby, the excavator, said nothing he simply met me at my truck and said I want you to see something. We exchanged pleasantries as we walked over to the edge of the foundation excavation which at the time was 6'-6'' below the natural grade. I looked down into the 80' by 40' hole and was stunned to see what appeared to be a stone paved road.

I had a fascination, as a boy, for arrowheads, but never gave archaeology much thought until this excavation revealed the anomaly fore mentioned. Bobby and I went down into the hole and studied the apparent pavers. They were definitely man made and skillfully cut and placed in place. The front end loader had excavated a small area or cross section of the road and there was a 12" gravel base beneath the pavers.

The road seemed to be headed northwest and so I instructed Bobby to keep excavating the assumed road (approx. 60'). We reached the property line and stopped for obvious reasons. I called the University of Cincinnati, department of archaeology, they were not interested.

The material strata was 2 feet of black humus topsoil and about 4'-6" of brown and blue clay. The road pavers varied from 6" to 7'' in thickness. The pavers were 8" to 14" in length and 6" to 8" in width. There were various other sizes, but the sizes I mentioned were dominate. The pavers were placed on top of one foot of fine gravel and sand.

Conclusion: The University wasn't interested so I assumed that the road was not ancient and that somehow the road got covered up and forgotten. Years latter I would recall this road and began to realize that I had never seen a limestone paver road in Cincinnati. Brick streets were still common in the downtown area and there were even 6"x6" granite pavers in some parts of the downtown Cincinnati. Today all that is left of the granite street paves are the ones salvaged and used to pave the famous Fountain Square Plaza. The stone pavers at the excavation site were made of limestone, a common regional material that often protruded from the hillsides of Cincinnati. But, as I said I have never seen limestone paved streets in Cincy.

You are correct. If an archaeological discovery is outside of the academic standard, its ignored or ridiculed. Ugh!


Will said (March 11, 2010):

Not only do archaeological finds disprove Darwinism, but there is no proof of macro-evolution (species to species mutation) whatsoever. Of course species adapt to their environments and their characteristics can change over time, but there is no evidence in the fossil record or anywhere else to prove that one species transforms into another.

The complete title of Darwin's book is, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life." Darwin was a renowned racist looking for a scientific excuse for slavery and genocide of "undesirable" and "inferior" races. Evolution has been used to justify every major genocide and wicked philosophy--i.e. Naziism, stalinism, communism--in history by killing off the weak.

Evolution makes a hero out of death and completely negates all morality and humane compassion. When you tell people that they are evolved animals that are floating on a lawless and indifferent planet in outer space they begin to act as just that--lawless animals with no morality or accountability for themselves.
DNA is proof of a designer. The number of chromosomes from everything from a tomato, to a dog, to a human vary so drastically; there is no evidence of an upward evolutionary progression. To quote another: if you saw a painting or a statue in the forest and there was no one to be seen for 100s of miles, would you assume that it happened all by itself or that it had a creator? DNA is so mind-bogglingly complex that it proves a creator. Don't you think people's self-esteem and moral conviction would be higher if they were taught that they were designed in the image of God rather than freaks of nature that evolved from a rock billions of years ago?

This is how the illuminati want us to view ourselves.

Dr. Kent Hovind, who was framed for tax evasion and is now in prison, has over 17 hours of video in which he disproves every "proof" or argument for evolution. He has successfully debated top scientists and offered a $250,000 reward for proof of evolution. His debates and articles can be found at www.drdino.com and www.freehovind.com.
Evolution is the most effective means of destroying peoples faith in God and in the basis for absolute morality. As Hovind says "if there is no God, then how do you determine right from wrong?" And who determines it? Our satanic politicians who molest children? Evolution is one of the "strong delusions" now face. People "professing themselves wise have become fools.""Who turned the truth into a lie and worshiped the creature more than the creator?"
Evolution is satanic at worst and foolish at best. It is used by guilt-ridden and immoral people to justify their sinful lifestyles and sexual perversions. Period. Evolution gives people a rational excuse to live like godless, materialistic and selfish animals.


Dan said (March 11, 2010):

The judeo / christian view of history IS NOT diametrically opposed to the theory of evolution. This is classic hegelian dialectic. Both arguments are "Mind control" as stated by their respective orthodox authorities.

Successive generations of cockroaches become increasingly resistant to poison till finally they become immune.
This is obvious proof of the theory of evolution right there.
So it applies when it applies.

We are putting fish genes in tomatoes.
We breed dogs.(split from wolves 90,000 years ago, ain't that a Monkey wrench)
We put spider genes into goats.
This is intelligent(sic) design.
So it applies when it applies.

Reading Velikovski and everyone that followed him, ( and noting all the underwater remains of habitation around the world ) we find that catastrophism ( from whatever cause - meteors, the regular glacial cycle, Man's use of DU or GMO...etc )is the prime element of change in the world.

Of course while everyone is tied up in knots of "belief" ( believing and knowing are two different things) the perpetrators of this confusion realise that along with the hard wired genetics of life the "programming" of the intelligence that goes along with every life form is half the factor in how the creature evolves.

So the so called "illuminati", who think that their programming is uncorrupted hope to evolve to the top, whilst those they falsely program, they hope shall devolve to the bottom.


Vance said (March 11, 2010):

This longish paper crossed my path a few weeks ago. Using current scientific findings it shows how the evolutionary model is not supported by facts. Having never really thought to seriously question evolutionary theory before, this paper has profoundly shaken my long held beliefs.

About half way through the paper is a mind-boggling description of the folding of amino acid ribbons into proteins, using chaperone proteins,

"Chaperones can keep proteins separated from each other while they are folding, prevent mistakes in folding, and even unfold mistakes to give the protein a second chance to get it right. After helping one protein fold, a chaperone will go help another one fold."

http://www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html


Jeff said (March 11, 2010):

I very much enjoyed the above referenced article. Without going into detail, it is obvious to anyone that has done any kind of honest research that archeological fraud and deceit are commonplace in the scientific community, particularly with regards to Darwinism.

I have a Masters degree in Physics from the Georgia Institute of Technology and I too accepted Darwinism as a young man. It was only later when I looked into the theory myself that I saw it for what it is, completely unsupported by the scientific evidence, both archaeological and biological.

I consider myself an unbiased observer, as my world view is not influenced in any way by whatever the truth may be. Indeed, even as a believer in the theory as a young man, my faith in God/Creator was not affected in the least. Who am I to tell God what he can or can not do, or did or did not do, with his Universe? But the truth is that so little evidence exists to support the theory that it should have been discarded long ago, or at least accepted for what it is, a wholly unsupported theory. That the scientific community continues to shout that the theory is somehow scientific fact is intellectual dishonesty at its worst.

Macro evolution, the origin of life, the fossil and geological record, the incredible complexity of living organisms, the fact that DNA contains information, all of these things and much more cast serious doubt on the validity of Darwinism, yet it continues to be accepted as truth by its supporters and the scientific community.

It is interesting that even among supporters of Darwinism, some of them have honestly stated that so little evidence exists to support the theory and it simply must be accepted as a matter of faith. A little bit of unbiased research and intellectual honesty is all that is needed to realize that Darwinism, as presently accepted, is seriously flawed.

Richard Dawkins is widely regarded as one of the leading experts and supporters of Darwinism. But as a self avowed militant atheist, how can anyone say that he can even begin to be unbiased with regards to objectively evaluating the evidence? The truth is that he cannot, and he is nothing more than the atheists version of the very worst Christian televangelists. His book "The God Delusion" is so poorly written that I actually found myself laughing out loud while reading it. I dare anyone to support that book as anything more than ideological ranting. It is certainly far from high level intellectual thought. I actually believe that an average 8th grader could have written a more well reasoned and logical argument.


M said (March 11, 2010):

http://www.amazon.com/Upright-Ape-New-Origin-Species/dp/1564149331

Take a look at the Upright Ape by Filler. Serious study which says man is twenty million years old, and modern apes descended from man.


Michael said (March 11, 2010):

In case this may be of interest,here is a potential alternative scientific hypothesis to Evolution Theory, which -

1. Offers a logical explanation to the appearances of the Ufos, over the millennia, especially since 1945 and Hiroshima - ' the oh my god the kids have found the matches', stage in the development of our humanity

2. Once one understands the scientific predictability that our humanity finds itself in today, then the ORIGINAL 'good measure' intent, behind all the religions becomes more clear; to precipitate a capacity within our humanity to survive and cope with this predictable period, which we entered in 1945,on our own.

This is against a backdrop of our planet being very ancient, and upon which there have been many humanities, which have disappeared for the self-evident treasons we can understand today.Progressive evolution of design, evidenced by the theory of evolution, is in this theory progressive evolution of design by advanced science over some 12000 years, followed by the creation of the first man and 13000 years of history.

www.1945-666.com OR www.ufos-evolutionmyth.com


Mark said (March 11, 2010):

great article from your corespondent
talked to Cremo on the phone years ago. nice guy
forbidden archeology is okay
but an even better book is genesis giants by steve quayle
you'd really like it
and it should be read in conjunction with nephilim stargates by tom horn
these two books clarify much


William said (March 11, 2010):

As a person who was an avid reader {2nd year college level in third grade I read everything I could get my hands on, finishing 2 to 3 books a day. Living in Greeley, Colorado my dad ran the presses for the Greeley Tribune, so I had access to the microfilm files.

On microfilm was every page ever printed by the tribune. Reading papers from the 1870's up there was here and there odd findings, from the mines, farms etc. That refuted Darwinism back then but then the stories would die.

So a good place to see and find alternate archeology is old news paper archives.


Will said (March 11, 2010):

Not only do archaeological finds disprove Darwinism, but there is no proof of macro-evolution (species to species mutation) whatsoever. Of course species adapt to their environments and their characteristics can change over time, but there is no evidence in the fossil record or anywhere else to prove that one species transforms into another.

The complete title of Darwin's book is, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life." Darwin was a renowned racist looking for a scientific excuse for slavery and genocide of "undesirable" and "inferior" races. Evolution has been used to justify every major genocide and wicked philosophy--i.e. Naziism, stalinism, communism--in history by killing off the weak.

Evolution makes a hero out of death and completely negates all morality and humane compassion. When you tell people that they are evolved animals that are floating on a lawless and indifferent planet in outer space they begin to act as just that--lawless animals with no morality or accountability for themselves.
DNA is proof of a designer. The number of chromosomes from everything from a tomato, to a dog, to a human vary so drastically; there is no evidence of an upward evolutionary progression. To quote another: if you saw a painting or a statue in the forest and there was no one to be seen for 100s of miles, would you assume that it happened all by itself or that it had a creator? DNA is so mind-bogglingly complex that it proves a creator. Don't you think people's self-esteem and moral conviction would be higher if they were taught that they were designed in the image of God rather than freaks of nature that evolved from a rock billions of years ago?

This is how the illuminati want us to view ourselves.

Dr. Kent Hovind, who was framed for tax evasion and is now in prison, has over 17 hours of video in which he disproves every "proof" or argument for evolution. He has successfully debated top scientists and offered a $250,000 reward for proof of evolution. His debates and articles can be found at www.drdino.com and www.freehovind.com.
Evolution is the most effective means of destroying peoples faith in God and in the basis for absolute morality. As Hovind says "if there is no God, then how do you determine right from wrong?" And who determines it? Our satanic politicians who molest children? Evolution is one of the "strong delusions" now face. People "professing themselves wise have become fools.""Who turned the truth into a lie and worshiped the creature more than the creator?"
Evolution is satanic at worst and foolish at best. It is used by guilt-ridden and immoral people to justify their sinful lifestyles and sexual perversions. Period. Evolution gives people a rational excuse to live like godless, materialistic and selfish animals.


Jesper (Brazil) said (March 11, 2010):

Forbidden Archeology does not propose to account for the origin of man, but it does show us that when all the available evidence regarding human fossils and other remains reported by scientists is put together - and nothing is refused for ideological reasons - the theory of human evolution from lower apelike forms becomes clearly untenable. Some might question the credibility of certain archeological finds and reports - whether rated as anomalous or not - but if just one out of the reports discussed in the anomalous-evidence section of Forbidden Archeology (well over 400 pages) is undisputable, then the authors would have made their case.

And truly, quite a bit of the evidence that falls outside the official paradigms of human evolution presents a scientific reporting standard as high as - or even higher than - much of the currently accepted and vehemently advertised evidence.

It is however not correct to say that Cremo and Thompson´s thesis is that the currently favored model of human prehistory is a deliberate tool of disinformation and mind control. Their central argument does not go beyond the phenomenon which sociologists of scientific knowledge call "the knowledge filter".

I am not saying Cornelius B. is on the wrong track in his search for more somber connections and agendas, but it is only fair to say that Forbidden Archeology is a very sober analysis of papers published in journals of archeology over the past 150 years with no discussion on conspiracy theory, religion or alternative sciences. Two things are as regrettable as they are unavoidable: fans of Forbidden Archeology tend to give way too much importance to the supplemental chapter on "highly anomalous evidence", which might have been omitted from the book with absolutely no loss to the argument, and detractors of the book refuse to read more than 5 or 10 of its 900+ pages before they feel prepared to condemn it in forums and classrooms.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at