Judge Failed Diana; Let's Fail Judges
May 27, 2011
The Judge in the inquest into Princess Diana's murder had a conflict of interest. He had sworn an oath to the Queen; yet the royal family was the primary suspect.
By Debra Siddons
(henrymakow.com)
Fourteen years after the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, many still believe she was murdered. The recently released documentary film, "Unlawful Killing" revisits evidence put forth in the 2007-2008 Coroner's Inquest by Mohamed Al-Fayed.
The film has been billed by its director Keith Allen as an "inquest into the inquest." It launches a "full-frontal attack on the British establishment", and "in particular the 'royal' justice system and the monarchy who Fayed believes was behind the fatal crash in a Paris road tunnel" according to The Independent.
Mohamed Al-Fayed, father of Diana's boyfriend Dodi who also died in the car crash, invested £2.5 million for the making of "Unlawful Killing" to keep this case alive for a complacent public. For the government-controlled mainstream media, that makes the film a "conspiracy theory." But what dad would give up on seeking justice for the death of his son and future daughter-in-law, who reportedly was carrying his grandchild?
THE QUEEN OF HEARTS CROSSES THE PRINCE OF DARKNESS
Diana said in the BBC interview that the Royal family viewed her as a loose cannon and rebel. Diana openly said she would not be silenced and would continue her public campaign for the banning of land-mines.
In a handwritten note to her butler and confidant Paul Burrell, Diana predicted her own death stating that certain members of the Royal family were "planning 'an accident' in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him (Charles) to marry". Al-Fayed said "Diana told me personally during a holiday in the South of France, If anything happens to me, make sure those people are exposed. The person who is spearheading these threats is Prince Philip."Prince Philip is a man known for dark, though revealing statements such as, in 1988, "In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."
In his preface to "Down to Earth," Prince Philip stated "I don't claim to have any special interest in natural history," and continued "but as a boy I was made aware of the annual fluctuations in the number of game animals and the need to adjust the 'cull' to the size of the surplus population."
A PAIN IN THE ROYAL BACKSIDE
Diana was a nightmare for the 'Monarchy' that kept getting worse. Could the head of the Church of England allow the future king to be the stepson of an Arab Muslim, especially one whose dad had longstanding enemies in parliament? Diana was exposing high ranking public figures for profiting from landmines, etc., operations run by MI6. Could the military establishment and secret intelligence services allow this to continue?
"Diana's anti-landmines activity was a possible motive for murder that was almost completely ignored by the 832-page Paget Report, produced by Lord Stevens in December 2006." - Anti-Landmines Campaign
After 6 months of listening to testimony in the 2007-2008 Coroner's Inquest in Britain's High Court, Judge Scott Baker told the jury that he was withdrawing the option of murder as a verdict. This is a complete perversion of justice. The judge is supposed to be a neutral party and should NEVER say or do anything that would influence the jury or the outcome of the case.
"On the morning of 31 March, he stated: "My direction in law to you is that it is not open to you to find that Diana and Dodi were unlawfully killed in a staged accident" (13.25, 14.1-2).
Baker went on to explain: "When a coroner leaves a verdict of unlawful killing, in this case on the basis of a staged accident, to a jury, he must identify to the jury the evidence on which they could be sure of such a conclusion. But in this case sufficient evidence simply does not exist" (14.11-15)." - Removal of Murder as a Possible Verdict
In fact, Judge Baker did not allow certain evidence to be presented. There is a legal maxim that states that no man can judge in his own cause or in a cause that he is a party to.
Since every judge has sworn an oath to the queen and derives their authority from her, a matter involving the Royal family or questioning the jurisdiction and the sovereignty of the queen could only be impartially and lawfully decided by a jury.
How then can one of "her majesty's" judges make an impartial ruling in "her majesty's court in a matter implicating a member of the Royal family? For The Law to be justly and fairly applied, everyone must be subject to it, up to and including the queen who swore on The Bible to do her utmost to maintain The Law of God.
IN DIANA'S DEFENSE
My article entitled, "Landmark Case Could Stymie Legal System", reveals that the "invisible power" behind the so-called Royal family is in fact based on a massive deception that could be exposed using a remarkably simple and bullet-proof defense. This completely Lawful defense was recently introduced at the start of the trial of John Anthony Hill where a corrupt judge ignored it because if he hadn't, it would have dismantled the entire corrupt system from the top down.
The more people that learn about this defense, and the more support that grows at the grass-roots level, the more difficult it will be for judges to ignore. The press had no choice but to cover the Birkenhead Court story, where 600 people went to arrest a judge, because of the level of support. Hopefully those of you who believe Diana and Dodi were murdered will study and help implement this defense so that the perpetrators can be brought to justice.Once the corrupt system is dismantled, a real public inquest into the death of Diana could take place where all of the available and unfiltered evidence would be presented to a jury, instead of one of "her majesty's" gate-keepers barring justice at the door. A peaceful revolution for the truth made possible by the perfect defense...if we act now. The Defense is explained in the video here. Queen Elizabeth did not keep her oath to enforce the laws of God; and she was improperly crowned.
The United Kingdom could again be the envy of and example for the world. But it will require determination from all of us to unite in the pursuit of truth and justice for all, under God's Perfect Royal Laws of Liberty.
May God Bless His United Kingdom on Earth.
--
