Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below- Israel Seeks World Domination (scroll down)

The Death of Israeli Agent and "Argentine" Prosecutor Alberto Nisman

January 26, 2015


nisman.jpg(left, Alberto Nisman and Argentine President Cristina Kirchner)

Adrian Salbuchi explains the background to the mysterious death
last week of Alberto Nisman who was in charge of the investigation
 on the AMIA/DAIA Jewish Center terror attack
in Buenos Aires in July 1994 which left 85 Argentinians dead.
For over a decade, he permanently acted as a double agent for Israel and the US.
Last week he was worth more to Israel dead than alive.







by Adrian Salbuchi
(abridged by henrymakow.com)





Just over two months after Israel's Lebanon incursion, on September 22, 2006 a private meeting took place at the New York Waldorf-Astoria hotel between then Argentine President Nestor Kirchner, his first lady Cristina Kirchner (National Senator and soon to be president) and Foreign Minister Jorge Taiana, and key powerful Jewish leaders including the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the World Jewish Congress (WJC), the B'Nai B'Rith Jewish Masonic Lodge and its militant arm the Anti Defamation League (ADL).

An agreement was reached in which Argentina would accuse Iran of the AMIA attack, to which end Mr. Kirchner immediately dispatched federal prosecutor Alberto Nisman to the US to "gather the necessary evidence against Iran" from the CIA and Mossad intelligence agencies who clearly had their Anti-Iran axe to grind.

As proof of full US and Israeli satisfaction with Argentina, the World Jewish Congress's political director Rabbi Israel Singer promptly expressed these organizations' satisfaction with Argentina's accusations against Iran, proof that the Waldorf-Astoria agreement was being executed by the Kirchner Administration.

Mr. Nisman immediately accused former Iranian President Ali Rafsanjani and key ministers of masterminding the AMIA attack. However, he was never able produce proper, tenable proof.

He actually requested Interpol to arrest former Iranian ambassador to Argentina, Mr. Hami Soleimanpour in London, his arrest by British authorities quickly ended because Mr. Nisman submitted no proper evidence of its accusations, even making the Argentine government pick up the £200,000 court costs.

Irrespective of this, over the past decade Mr. Nisman became the darling of Jewish entities in the US, Israel and Europe where he regularly visited to brief them on the AMIA/DAIA case. In 2007, he actually went so far as to report on the matter to the Supreme Court... not of Argentina, but of Israel.

Mr. Nisman became very popular and was very much in the media but had just one problem: He just could not put together a proper case with proper evidence against Iran, to the growing concern of US Neocons like Republican lobbyist-legislator Ileana Ros-Lethinen and Israel's successive ultra-right-wing governments.

The case sank to new depths of confusion when in January 2014, former Israeli ambassador to Argentina during the AMIA attack, Yitzhak Aviram, publicly boasted that "the people who blew up the AMIA building have all been executed by us (Israel)." He was immediately hushed up by Israel.

AMERICAN CHANGE OF HEART

In sync with the Kirchner Administration, Mr. Nisman continued to blame Iran, but when the Obama Administration came to power in 2009, the US began having second thoughts about Baby Bush's aggressive Neocon strategy of "taking out Iran".

With things growing dramatically worse in Iraq, and a growing resistance from Russia and other players to US/UK war-mongering, America became much more moderate on Iran and, through "unofficial and discrete channels" it was made clear to President Cristina Kirchner that maybe the time had come for her to have a chat with the Iranians.

Thus, in January 2013, Argentina announced that it would indeed "start talking" to the Iranians - something it had not done for almost seven years - and quickly a "Memorandum of Understanding" was signed which became local law in March 2013. As part of this, a "Commission for Truth" was to be set up (but wasn't Mr. Nisman and his Mossad and CIA controllers supposed to have in their power all the "damning truth and evidence against Iran"?)

Neocons in the US and Israelis went ballistic with rage. To add insult to injury, last December President Kirchner cleaned out the top brass at the local SI Intelligence Agency, specifically throwing out US/UK/Israeli operator-agent Jaime Stiusso.

Mr. Nisman was supposed to be on holidays touring Europe with his 15-year-old daughter during all of this month of January. However, suddenly whilst visiting Amsterdam "somebody there" seems to have ordered him to fly back immediately to Argentina. So fast that he asked his wife to pick up their daughter at Madrid Airport where he dropped her off and flew on to Buenos Aires.

Upon arriving, he produced out of his hat as if by magic, a 350 page dossier case accusing President Kirchner and her (also Jewish) Foreign Minister Hector Timerman of "covering-up" Iran. He was about to present this during a special emergency summer session in Argentina's Congress at 3pm on Monday, January 19, but he may have realized that his case was still-born and had no chance whatsoever of holding up.

Anyway - alas! - he (or "somebody") conveniently killed him sometime early Sunday, January 18.

Nisman's case and the ensuing cross-questioning would have probably thrown the whole AMIA/DAIA investigation back to square one.....If Mr. Nisman's flawed case were unmasked then the beehive would once again be stirred and that represented something very dangerous for the US, Israel, local and international Jewish lobbies that have fought so hard to put the blame on Iran. And that a far more plausible lead should be investigated: a possible Israeli connection.

ISRAELI CONNECTION

....Busybody Nisman was coming too uncomfortably close to stirring the bee hive. Maybe that's what led to his death.

Just as the police commissioner investigating the Charlie Hebdo event was "suicided" on the night of that attack; or as London Underground electrician Jean Menezes, who may have "seen something" in the days prior to the July 2005 London Transport attacks was "mistakenly" gunned down by London Police only a few days later.

Clearly, the "War on Terror" has come home to Argentina. Again.

As we write, the powerful local Jewish lobbies DAIA and AMIA are yelling and whining that they "fear a third terror attack against Jewish interests in Argentina," conveniently media-fed by the "unexplained disappearance" of an Argentine Army anti-tank missile earlier this month.

The US Center for Security Policy just published an article in The Washington Times calling on the US and EU to impose "sanctions against Argentina."

Presidential elections will be taking place later this year in Argentina, and practically all the candidates - with favorites Daniel Scioli, Mauricio Macri, and Sergio Massa leading the list - are toeing the politically correct line, a fact that is most consistent considering that they regularly visit and report to the Rockefeller-Negroponte-William Rhodes "Americas Society," and regularly pay homage to the World Jewish Congress, American Jewish Committee, DAIA, AMIA and other local and international Israeli lobbies.

Finally, for Ms. Kirchner there are two lessons: (1) when ultra-right wing Israelis and Neocons fight amongst themselves, do not stray into the crossfire, and if you do pick one side then stay there; because (2) "Rome does not reward traitors."

-------

Adrian Salbuchi is a political analyst, author, speaker and radio/TV commentator in Argentina. He is also the Founder of the Second Republic Project - Proyecto Segunda República.






You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2015/01/the-death-of-alberto-nisman.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "The Death of Israeli Agent and "Argentine" Prosecutor Alberto Nisman "

JG said (January 26, 2015):

I'm surprised that a Muslim's Terrorist ID or passport has not yet been found that was accidentally dropped around the scene of this crime by now. Has the Israeli Mossad actually lost some confidence in the goyim's gullibility? I don't think so, I'm sure that a manufactured narrative of this crime is already in the making.

This recent wave of " Israeli victimhood" whether credible or not is the trump card that has always been used when the nations become reluctant to go to war against each other. America must war for the Jews at all costs around the world because their New Testament Deniers of the clergy in Washington believe they will be cursed by God for not doing so. Any US President or Free World leader that refuses to do this will be demonized as an anti semite or a Hitler by the MSM. This strategy has yielded them much success in the past.

It's been a waste for America to arm Israel. Did they really think that Israel was going to let them off the hook and fight their own wars?
No way, Netanyahu and the House of Rothschild both know that it's the important people who start the wars and it's the "punks" who do the killing.

These people are absolutely mad and there is no way of earning their respect.


Below- Women Don't Want Commitment, Man Discovers (scroll down)

Israel Dedicated to World Conquest

January 25, 2015

israel-boy-flag-AP.jpg

"Greater Israel as a slogan doesn't stand 
for the conquest of a country from Egypt
to Mesopotamia, it stands for world control."

(Disclaimer: Francis claims to be a Voodoo adept. He has written provocative
articles for this site before- see links below. I agree that Cabalist Judaism is
essentially about world domination but I think ISRAEL is merely a chess piece, 
but a valuable one that the illuminati will never sacrifice. I welcome reader response, 
especially n the Noahide Laws.) 







By Francis 
(henrymakow.com) 

For your information about Greater Israel : the two blue stripes on the Israeli flag don't represent merely the Nile and Euphrates rivers, but the greater oceans these lesser rivers merge into (oceans were once thought to be wider rivers, and called this both in the Bible and in Homer's poetical works with the dual number, which they are actually if you study the sea currents ; "both oceans" is also a recurring grammatically dual expression in the Qur'an).

Greater Israel is the whole landmass surrounded by those two big oceans; and by the same way,the Israeli flag has a reverse side, it comprises the American continent, too. 

The Israeli flag, which is but a Jewish prayer shawl adorned with a six-pointed star (or a lily flower seen from above if you will, standing for king David's lineage).  Greater Israel as a slogan doesn't stand for the conquest of a country from Egypt to Mesopotamia, it stands for world control.  
As you partake of real Jewish studies, you delve into the occult powers by which the world is ruled. You discover This world control is not to be achieved one day in the near or distant future; it is conceived as something eternally granted to Jewry. 


NK.jpgANTI ZIONIST JEWS

Beware of many "anti-Zionist" Jews who criticize Israel as an overly materialistic and nationalistic interpretation of their tradition. What they fear is that they might lose control over the whole world in exchange for a mere region of it.

What they also fear in the long run is that the non-Jews would seize upon the pretext they have a nation to repatriate them all out of their countries.  Israel as a nation-state like any other, far from granting conquest of the world by Jews, may put the global control over all things they exert through witchcraft into jeopardy, unless it is conceived as a kind of miniature scale model of the whole world. 

It thus comes as no surprise that such New World Order pontiffs as Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski now hint at the phasing out of Israel as a national entity for Jews : the land promised to them is the whole world.

THE NOAHIDE  DOCTRINE

For your information : the Noahide doctrine, is to provide the non-Jews with some form of Judaism. "Light" is a quite recent way of interpreting some passages of the Talmud.  The first thing that was explicitly founded in that intention was the Church of England, which rapidly developed into a very minimalistic set of moral requirements calling for a purely mundane morality, a position which came to be called "latitudinarianism".  

leviticus-numbers-deuteronomy-3-728.jpg
The more classical interpretation was obedience to Noahide laws as a mere external and anthropological criterium to distinguish the "just" among the non-Jews from the rest to be dammed both by Jews and God. Despite their religion being pagan, did such and such individual, like for instance Plato (Philo of Alexandria answered with a resounding yes), obey in fact the said seven commands? 

Up to a recent date when Judaism practically converged with European Masonry, the Jews were not supposed to devise and teach another religion than theirs to new converts, and in principle remain not supposed to mingle into any other religion than theirs except to elicit a temporary profit by selling articles such as garments...

decap.pngMany oriental Jews thought original Hinduism to have been the Noahide religion of antiquity (this is coherent with many parts of the Hindu narrative, especially as regards the laws of Manu) before it got corrupted into its present idolatrous and polytheistic form, with the exception of Yogis that keep content with the One God referred to by Patanjali to be reached by only One Word.

But even more numerous were the Jews who thought Islam to be the final creed teaching and imposing the Noahide laws as their sole doctrine to the whole of humanity, so as to justify their siding with Islamic invaders and immigration throughout the whole history of Christendom.
-------
Also by Francis:
Homosexuality: The Voodoo View
Jews: The Voodoo View 

First Comment from Dan:

You won't find a list of "Noahide Laws" in any Christian Bible.   The notion originated in the Mishnah Torah - the general Talmudic code of law finalized by the 12th century AD super rabbi RamBam, aka 'Maimonides'.    The Mishnah obligates Jews to work toward a world in which rabbinical courts will enforce these laws on the whole world.   RamBam pronounced the death penalty for Noahide law violations. Some Talmudic rabbis have argued that RamBam meant "punishments up to and including capital punishment".  

It was also advised that the goyim should administer and enforce the Noahide laws themselves. 

Some may be wondering, "there are lots of Jewish gay men and women leading the LGBT movement.  Why would they have a law that makes immoral sex punishable by death?".  

Because these laws aren't for Jews.  If it really were about Universal Justice, there would be no need of a separate set of laws for Goyim. 

Much more recently these notions were resurrected by "The Rebbe" Menachem Mendel Schneerson the Messiah of the  powerful Chabad-Lubavitch movement.  No one should underestimate the influence 'the Rebbe' had on Presidents of the United States. 

Ten years later, House Resolution 104, 102nd Congress of the United States was signed off by Speaker of the House  Tom Foley (Roman Catholic), and Vice President of the United States Dan Quayle (Presbyterian), acting as President of the Senate.  This is not a conspiracy theory - read it for yourself from the official Library of Congress,  Congressional archive online. [1] 

"WHEREAS RABBI MENACHEM MENDEL SCHNEERSON, LEADER OF THE LUBAVITCH MOVEMENT, IS UNIVERSALLY RESPECTED AND REVERED AND HIS EIGHTY-NINTH BIRTHDAY FALLS ON MARCH 26, 1991...IN TRIBUTE TO THIS GREAT SPIRITUAL LEADER, THE REBBE, THIS...THE YEAR IN WHICH WE...RETURN THE WORLD TO THE MORAL AND ETHICAL VALUES CONTAINED IN THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS" 

So what's wrong with a few laws against murder, robbery, immoral sex, and eating live animals?   Nothing wrong those laws, per se. It's the seventh law that worries me.  Dinim: Requirement to establish a justice system and courts to enforce the other six Noahide laws.  Even if it's not directly the International Beth Din (World Court of Jewry), that's World Court, and World Police to back it up. One World Government - that's the New World Order. 

The following is a verbatim, verified quote of David Ben Gurion from LOOK Magazine 1962

"The image of the world in 1987 as traced in my imagination: The Cold War
will be a thing of the past...
Western and Eastern Europe will become a federation of autonomous states
having a Socialist and democratic regime. With the exception of the U.S.S.R.
as a federated Eurasian State, all other continents will become united in a
world alliance at whose disposal will be an international police force..."

"In Jerusalem, the United Nations will build a shrine of the prophets to serve the federated
union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of
Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as
prophesied by Isaiah."

The most interesting thing about this bold prophecy is that Ben Gurion was an atheist. 








You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2015/01/Israel-dedicated-to-world-conquest.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Israel Dedicated to World Conquest"

Milton E said (January 26, 2015):

Christianity is classed as idolatry and therefore punishable by beheading.
Illicit sexual relations etc,etc are allowed in the Talmud so it only applies to Gentiles.

Albert Pike in a letter he was supposed to have written to Guisip Mazzini predicted Three World Wars in which the last was supposed to be between Israel/Zionism and Islam. Out of this destruction would come the Luciferian doctrine into mass worship and acceptance. Perhaps after this would come the building of the temple and the man of perdition/anti-Christ according to the Bible. Is something like this manifesting in front of our eyes in the daily news?


Kristine said (January 26, 2015):

People should not take the Noahide Laws at face value – that is, they should be interpreted through the prism of satanism.

For example, when the edict forbids blasphemy of “God” – you must know this is not the Almighty, but rather the fallen angel.

Also – prohibition on immorality will be “no heterosexual sex”; no idolatry would incorporate the worship of the one true Creator God.


Linda said (January 26, 2015):

I saw your interest in the Noahide on your recent post. This is a very important aspect of the Masonic Agentur of the Gentile and Social Masonry - which should never be lost sight of. The population of the Golem entities must be under Masonic discipline and Noahide Law.

One of the most important Noahide organizations is the post Vatican II Catholic Church.

Maurice Pinay has a file on this here:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com.au/#uds-search-results


KS said (January 25, 2015):

Francis certainly writes enthralling articles with very strange and fresh insights. His final paragraph refers to events that I have only ever heard mentioned once before (BBC program), and then dismissively, in passing.

"But even more numerous were the Jews who thought Islam to be the final creed teaching and imposing the Noahide laws as their sole doctrine to the whole of humanity, so as to justify their siding with Islamic invaders and immigration throughout the whole history of Christendom."

And as it seems that the potential penalty for a breach of the noahide laws is decapitation, a few things start becoming clearer. We in the West are very slow learners.


Eduardo from Brazil said (January 25, 2015):

One of the things I learned was about the Noahide Law: any non-Jew who adheres to these laws is regarded as a righteous gentile, and is assured of a place in the world to come

According to the Talmud and other Rabbis, they believe that Jews were appointed by God to teach gentiles to follow these laws. However, they are forbidden to follow the Torah, reserved only for the select and distinct chosen people.

About Lubavitch Rebbe, The Rebbe, which helped to expand the Jew agenda globally in many areas, was said: “In 1983 Schneerson launched a global campaign to promote awareness of the Supreme Being and observance of the Noahide Laws among all people, arguing that this was the basis for human rights for all civilization.” (Universal Morality - The Seven Noahide Laws, chabad.org, 2006)

Sure God told to Noah a few guidelines, and justice is one of the main principles. It is of interest of God to lead every people to be righteous. However, Jews looking for the opportunity to take over the world added this understanding to the Talmud and appointed themselves as the teachers and rulers over the gentiles. Stating that only they have the knowledge to judge and properly teach these laws.

God is interested on any people that seek justice, and love the truth by heart. If ever existed such Noahide Laws, that I doubt, it ceased to exist on the Cross of Jesus Christ, along with the Torah, Talmud and any other Jew traditions.


Below- The Racist Illuminati War on White Society (scroll down)

Women Don't Want Commitment, Man Discovers

January 24, 2015


GYR_erin01.JPG"Serial daters" -

After a divorce, George Smith, 47, is dating again and finding 
that women don't want sex or a relationship, just attention. 


"My experience leads me to believe that a majority of women
simply just don't need a man except to procreate."



 

by "George Smith"
(henrymakow.com)


I am a 47-year old father of two teenagers, currently living in a large Midwestern city.  

I own a successful real estate investment business.  My marriage of 17 years ended recently.  She cited my excessive drinking as the cause but the truth was that we were just two very different people who could no longer live under the same roof.                   

After the dust had settled, I decided to embark on a journey into the world of online dating.  I had no idea what to expect.  It had been 25 years since I had been on a date.        

Now after a year, I have realize that dating has many pitfalls. You must know what you want at the beginning.  In my case, I want a long-term relationship.  I was surprised to discover that many women in the dating world don't share this goal.          

My first experience with online dating was with a 45-year old woman named Vicki.  I found her attractive and smart.  We began the process of courtship, exchanging text messages and having phone conversations.  Everything seem to be going great.  We had dinner together and talked for three hours.  The next day we resumed our communication.  I thought that our relationship was definitely heading in the right direction.
 
I asked her out for a second dinner, via text message.  A day passed with no reply.  Several days passed.  Same thing.  I wondered if I should contact her again, but decided against it.  I was insulted.  I went through the usual rationalizations. Maybe she didn't get my text.  It was stressful.  How could she suddenly turn me off like a light switch? 

Months passed and I could see her checking out my profile online. I realized that Vicki, after eight years of dating, had no intention of being in a relationship.  She just liked the idea of chatting and going out on an occasional date.    

card.jpgI had two more similar experiences.  One was with a girl named Aimee.  Just like Vicki, she was attractive and smart.  We began our near daily routine of texting, combined with weekly phone calls.  Yet, the communication was always fairly superficial, not because I wanted it to be, but rather because she didn't seem open going deeper.

We went out on a date.  I thought it went fine.  I asked her out again.  She agreed to go, then abruptly stopped returning my text messages. I had fallen, yet again, for the serial dater.  Aimee, like Vicki, had also been dating for about eight years.  

I fully acknowledge that often the chemistry is not there and things fizzle out after a couple of months.  


SELF EVALUATION 

It's important to make an honest assessment of what you have to offer a potential partner.  Starting with physical appearance, I am 6' 1" and presently 215 pounds.   I swim everyday to stay fit,  so I have good muscle tone.   I'm lacking some hair, but generally speaking, I am of above average looks.  You can judge for yourself in reading this post as to my intellectual ability.  I operate a successful business and am financially able to experience just about anything that money can buy, within reason.  

I was in a relationship for over 20 years and although it ultimately failed, except for a couple of years, it was wonderful.   I drink very little, about every other week.  I have two wonderful kids, who are straight A students with good social skills.  I may have some personality weaknesses, but I can't think of anything glaring.  I think it's hard to be successful in business if you have major personality issues.  In short, I believe that I have a great deal to offer.       

I could have said something that turned these women off, but I don't think so.  I'm usually pretty careful about that.   Perhaps I should have flirted more, but as a novice dater, I don't have much recent game experience. I think that deep down, some people just don't want a relationship.   They like the dating and attention, but have no desire to go any further.   Seldom are they ever upfront about this to their pursuer.  

Dating is exhausting.  You can invest a great deal of time and energy into something that yields no fruit.
 
The point is that we should all learn to quickly identify these individuals.  Don't believe what they tell you about being interested in a relationship; you have to look at their dating history.         
                   
Perhaps people don't want to invest the time and hard work.  Maybe they fear commitment.  Feminism could certainly be the culprit.   My experience leads me to believe that a majority of women simply just don't need a man except to procreate.  I affectionately call them "pump and dump" women.   I know it sounds jaded.  But it's all I've seen so far. 
 
Currently I find myself being tempted by yet another beautiful and professionally successful woman named Michelle.  Her relationship history consists of two years of marriage and a child out of wedlock, followed by six years of dating. 

What do you think the chances are that I am the prince that she's been waiting for?  I think her past is the best indicator of what she will do in the future.  The flip side of it is maybe she's ready for a change.  But change of this magnitude is hard for anyone.   I'll keep you posted.

----------------
Makow Comment: These women are self sufficient economically and don't know what they want. You have to provide leadership. You want a woman who is submissive. The essence of the male-female relationship is that the man convinces a woman to do what he wants and rewards her with his love. Try making demands. You might be surprised at the result.
 

First Comment from Doug:

Henry, this is very true. In my own case, I am involved with a great woman -- who I believe was a serial dater prior to meeting me. She even had the nickname "two-date Tracy" because apparently, she would go out on a first date as an ice breaker. If the guy didn't turn her off, she'd go on a second date. She said that before the end of the second date there was something about the guy she wouldn't like and that would be that. 

So what's the difference with me?  She ended up really liking me. We have very similar intellectual pursuits and similar morals, and obviously there is the element of physical attraction as well. But its her mind that grips me the most. Her looks are really just a bonus. And she feels the same way, as we have talked about it. 

But anyway, yes, dating in 2015 sucks terribly.If you're a smooth talker, it is incredibly easy to get sex from them... But I am at the point in my life where I don't want that so much as I want a loyal friend & companion that is not a canine. LOL  I would like a lover and companion/best friend rolled into one.  Many women say they want that, but their actions indicate that they want to be comfortable enough with a guy to have sex and satisfy their sexual instincts for a while, and they just want some attention. Let's face it:  women today, unless they are mentally challenged and unable to work, do not need a man. Modern living has done damn-near irreparable damage to the state of affairs between men and women. 

What I am doing with the woman I've been seeing is simply being confident, believing in myself and being unapologetic for my behavior and/or views, and being a direct, even if it stings a bit... it seems that women are sick of emasculated men. They really desire a manly man who commands them. They want the alpha male they are hard wired for. The beta male that our society insists that men be, is a huge turn off for women. They want a man that is in control. They want a captain, because they want to be the first mate, just like youve always said!  







You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2015/01/serial-daters.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Women Don't Want Commitment, Man Discovers "

AC said (January 26, 2015):

"George" is looking for love in all the wrong places. What does he expect from professional independent women of his own class, even if such "independence" comes out of a soon to be done away with, artificially contrived state-of-affairs? If his search extended below his league into traditional Third World societies, he'd eventually find a devoted life-long partner -- and one still in her late 20's or early 30's. But it might mean having to lower his standards and expectations to find fulfillment in what he might still consider a come-down. In the end he'll get more by settling for less.


Joe said (January 26, 2015):

For ALL unmarried/divorced males in ALL modern western societies, GO YOUR OWN WAY. Leave these women BEHIND.

Kudos to "Bill S" because of MGTOW!

I posted the link to this article at MDTOW


Take Care, Beware, and Be Good!


Bill S said (January 25, 2015):

People date for a variety of reasons. Like George said, it's best to know your goal from the start. I "kissed dating goodbye" about 12 years ago. As George said, it's exhausting. And expensive. As you said, women want to be led. YET - they want to be led where they want to go. So you need to pay close attention to every clue they provide - in their profile, on dates, in texts, etc. In other words, women want men to do all the work (typical!). Both men and women want to play the field. Both like variety. Both want to cast a wide net - then weed out the losers. It's a numbers game, just like sales. Women should understand this. But often they are like jealous detectives, with a thousand questions and sh*t tests. Double standards abound. Especially the one about who pays - always the male. I got so sick of the rigged game, I just stopped playing it. MGTOW


Z said (January 25, 2015):

First of all - yes women are different and especially women in the age category of 45+ certainly want something different than at age 25 or 35 regardless whether they have children.

You might be interested to take a look at the following site with the corresponding Sexual Market Value development for men and women that women best would deny it exists: http://therationalmale.com/2012/06/04/final-exam-navigating-the-smp/

It seems rather to me that you did several errors which are of course understandable after such a long absence from the dating market:

1. You picked women who are too old for you - the feminine imperative shames you when you attempt to pick one 10-20 years younger, but that is what you should do. You are in shape, successful and good-looking. You would be amazed that you can attract women in the age categories of 25-35 quite easily.

2. Second you might want to take a look at some of the Game teachings that simply aid you to create more attraction with women by a series of good communication tools which work on women. Women in fact think very differently from us. Even adjusting your behavior selectively creates much different results.

(For links to further your knowledge just take a loot at http://therationalmale.com - he is a happily married man who analyzes relationship patterns and also continues to study Game as a form of relating better to women. Whether you use it for "easy sex" or on in your future wife Nr. 2 is irrelevant - the concepts are similar.)


Reg said (January 25, 2015):

Henry, I got a comment for this man. It goes like this: Location,location, location. He's in the wrong country. Women in the west are just no good. Stay away from that single mother--it's nothing but a big bag of stress in the making. Also, women in their middle ages are not fit for love and marriage, if they were, they wouldn't be available and if they were of any real value, they wouldn't be on the dating site. They're all a big bloody scam looking for attention but not offering anything in return. I say get out of the west if you have the financial resources. Go to south east Asia, Latin America or Eastern Europe, and find a real woman without baggage or feminist issues. It was over 15 years ago when I found out this way to OPT OUT of Feminazism.


LoisAnn said (January 25, 2015):

Dating is 'EXHAUSTING'? Does he think women do not sense this? If THIS is exhausting what does a woman feel should she become 'involved'? Online dating is pretty risky and for one so professionally set, of good appearance and intelligent writing he left out one important element. COMMON SENSE.

Surely in his own social group there must be someone who could be interesting or aware of someone who 'knows just the right person' for him.


Luke said (January 25, 2015):

In regards to dating, I think it's important for men to realize how dire the state of affairs are in the world today, and to realize that seeking a fulfilling relationship with a woman is a lost cause... and that there are far more important things for us God-loving men to be focusing our energy, thought, and time on... such as working on restoring God's creation to its pristine origins.

Since leaving the garden of Eden, we have travelled so far down the rabbit hole of sin that now evil is good and good is evil... In this evil world, we cannot expect God's creations to function as initially intended (especially women)

Women are programmed to be attracted to (and supportive of) a masculine man who aligns himself with God's creation. She is a perk in the life of a man who is on a mission with God...

However, to a man who is living a life of sin (in a world of sin) she will never find long-term attraction or even enjoy his company for long. She will learn to resent her man, belittle him, blame him for her suffering, etc, then eventually leave him (or push him away) and begin searching for the Man who will lead her back to the garden of Eden... and back into a relationship with her Father (God).

Remember, part of the original sin was when Adam chose to be led by Eve (when she suggested he take a bite out of the apple of the tree of knowledge of good and evil). We will never be able to make our way back to that garden if we continue to put women on a pedestal and let then take the lead.

Put women to the side and seek first the kingdom of God.


Tony B said (January 25, 2015):

On line dating? What did he expect? Shallow start, shallow result.

Try going to church to meet someone.

These days there is no guarantee there either as most churches are also shallow. Backslapping and pot luck before going home to the football game. And many people only go to try to gain something material. But it's still much better than on line dating, for crying out loud.

But we, in the English speaking west, live in a very satanic atmosphere which we mostly now take for granted and forget that it is satanic at its base. It's even tough when both parties are well meaning because we are all pretty much corrupted in our material world that dismisses any thoughts of spirituality as foolishness. Therefore couples have little of substance to offer one another. Just worldly vanity which leaves little to build upon since each already possesses too much of that.


Israel Refuses to repay Iran for its Share of the Cost of a Pipeline

January 21, 2015

pipeline.jpgNetanyahu signed secrecy order to conceal Israel-Iran legal battle
Private interests in Israel ripped off Iran after the Revolution

PM intervened to hide details of decades-long legal struggle in European courts, claiming disclosure would harm national security and foreign ties.

By Aluf Benn    Ha'aretz
    
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu strongly objects to revealing any information about the "oil arbitration" case that has been conducted between Israel and Iran in European courts for more than 20 years, the details of which were exposed on Haaretz.com this weekend.

Netanyahu signed a secrecy order in November 2013 banning the publication of information on the arbitration, because it "could possibly bring about harm to national security and foreign relations."

Netanyahu intervened to head off a petition filed in Jerusalem District Court in June 2013 by attorney Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, head of Shurat Hadin - Israel Law Center, under the Freedom of Information Law. The petition was against the foreign and justice ministries, requesting information about the arbitration proceedings with Iran.

The ministries rejected the request completely, and that case is now being heard in the Supreme Court, under a confidentiality order, after the Jerusalem District Court ordered the state to provide a proper response. The plaintiffs filed an updated brief last week, and the court is now awaiting the state's response.

The National Iranian Oil Company has been conducting a number of international arbitration proceedings against Israel. It has demanded compensation for its share of the joint Israeli-Iranian project for transporting and selling Iranian oil, via Israel to European customers, which was launched in 1968. At the heart of the deal stood the construction of a trans-Israel pipeline from Eilat to Ashkelon, as well as two oil storage facilities and a fleet of tankers.

The deal was hidden by a veil of secrecy, and Israel imposed censorship on any publication concerning the pipeline, its financing and operation.

A similar, smaller arbitration suit concerns a debt from the sale of Iranian oil to three Israeli fuel companies in 1979, on the eve of the Islamic Revolution. The arbitration suits are estimated to be for billions of dollars, given the interest and other costs that have accumulated over the decades.

After the Shah of Iran was deposed in January 1979, Tehran turned from being Israel's ally to its enemy. Israel continued to operate the pipeline, after nationalizing it in practice using a legal trick, and Iran sued Israel in an international arbitration process to receive its share of the profits of the joint venture.

Israel has lost a number of rounds in the arbitration, first in France and more recently in Swiss courts, where it tried to stop the arbitration process and avoid paying any money.

Both the Israeli and Iranian governments have avoided discussing the legal battle publicly, even though the various legal decisions have been published openly in Europe and raised a lot of interest in international legal circles.

Under the terms of the agreement, whose full content has yet to be made public, the Israeli government agreed to grant the oil project a 49-year concession, exemption from taxes and planning, and building leeway.

Censorship was imposed on press reports relating to the pipeline, its funding and sources of fuel. In those days of running roughshod by Mapai - the forerunner of Labor - and in the absence of green organizations and High Court of Justice petitions, the project was implemented in record time: by the end of 1969, oil was flowing through the pipeline. Israel built a second refinery in Ashdod and storage tanks at both ends of the pipeline.


Charlie Hebdo's Communist Culture War on Tradition & Religion - by Peter Myers, January 21, 2015

HebdoCoverJesus.jpg
I won't believe this attack actually took place until i see the pictures of the bullet ridden bodies.




Charlie Hebdo's Communist Culture War on Tradition & Religion - by Peter Myers, January 21, 2015


The Culture War grew out of the 60s Movement. Many of us, including myself, participated in it without realizing where it was going.

We knew that it was led by Communists and Anarchists, but we only saw a good side: ending the Vietnam War, saving the environment, escaping social conventions, freedom from religious dogmas and strictures.

The nice people in the movement dropped out; the hardliners stayed in, and proceeded to destroy our civilization - Western Civilization. We did not realize until it was too late.

The push for Gay Marriage is not about individual rights, but about destroying the social structure. Marriage and the Family are its bedrock. Every human society up until now has been based on them, but Communists believe there's no Human Nature and that "Man Makes Himself".

Gay Marriage was pioneered by Communists, but later adopted and marketed by Liberals.

Charlie Hebdo was one of the main Culture Warriors on that Communist side. Pussy Riot is another.

In media reports, the Culture War is often mis-defined. We are told that Muslim Fundamentalists are waging a Culture War against the Liberal West.

In reality, that Liberal West is not the real West at all, but a Communist entity waging war against all tradition - whether Christian, Muslim, Asian or Aboriginal.

The editor of Charlie Hebdo, Stéphane Charbonnier, was a member of the French Communist Party (PCF); he also had strong ties to the Left Party (Parti de gauche), led by Jean-Luc Mélenchon.

Charbonnier was a militant atheist.

Under Charbonnier, Charlie Hebdo ridiculed not only Islam but also Christianity.

Yet, in the backlash over the cartoons, Muslim mobs have attacked Christians, not realizing that they too were targets of Charlie Hebdo. This magazine has fanned the Clash of Civilizations.

An earlier editor of Charlie Hebdo was sacked for anti-Semitism . Since then, it seems, Jews and Judaism have largely escaped the magazine's venom.

Some Trots, Greens, & Anarchists, eg Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Socialist Alliance, and the WSWS site, condemn Charlie Hebdo for Provocation promoting the Clash  of Civilizations. They realize that their Culture War, once taken too far, might lead the French to install Marine Le-Pen to power, and that she will end the Culture War.
------
Related:
 Charlie Hebdo editor Stéphane Charbonnier ties to French Communist Party (PCF) & Left Party (Parti de gauche)
https://tendancecoatesy.wordpress.com/2012/09/19/charlie-hebdo-publishes-new-mohammed-cartoons/

-------------


Is Belief in God Essential to Moral behavior?

January 13, 2015

image1 (1).JPG