Below-Exile in Thailand Better Than Exile at Home - US Retiree (scroll down)

Brexit- What is the Hidden Globalist Game?

June 26, 2016

Boris Johnson's stepmother Jenny, the second wife of his father Stanley, is the stepdaughter of Edward Sieff, the former chairman of Marks & Spencer

The prompt acceptance of the narrow referendum win should make you suspicious. Brexit is supposed to be a blow to the masonic Jew World Order. But all the usual suspects including the mass media supported it. What trick do the globalists have up their sleeve?

"Brexit is pure political theatre for the gullible masses and nothing more...Throughout the campaign, Brexiters lamented how the establishment was ranged against them, but in truth the reverse was the reality."

By Northsider
Brexit- Another Jewish Dialectic?

There is great rejoicing in much of the so called alternative media over the "Brexit" result in yesterday's British referendum on membership of the European Union. If more proof were needed that the alternative media is often misinformed and credulous, this is it.

Alternative types, from David Duke to David Icke, have of course been insisting for months that the Brexit movement represents a mighty blow against Zio-globalism. There may be some excuse for Duke to believe this guff: he is, after all, an American and presumably relies on British "white nationalists" for information about such matters. There is little or no excuse for British white nationalists themselves, or for British critics of Zionism like Icke, to be so deceived.

(l. Borris and his buddy in Masonic handshake)

Unless they have been paying very scant attention indeed, they should have noticed that the Brexit movement is overwhelmingly dominated not just by common or garden variety Zionists, but by hard-core Zionist ultras of a particularly toxic variety. For example, Boris Johnson, the part-Jewish de facto frontman for Brexit, describes himself as "a passionate Zionist" and supports with an equal passion both the corrupt City of London and mass migration to Europe.

But compared to Michael Gove, the other leading Tory Brexit spokesman and senior British cabinet member, Boris is a veritable peacenik. Gove has never seen a Zio-war he didn't like. A former journalist with the Zionist London Times newspaper, he once penned the following excruciating line about war criminal Blair: "I can't help myself! I love Tony!".

It's worth pointing out, by the way, that Johnson, and more especially Gove, are close personal friends of British Prime Minister David Cameron, which makes it, therefore, more than plausible to suggest that their dispute over Brexit is pure political theatre for the gullible masses and nothing more.

Chris Grayling, another senior Tory Brexiter, is a member of British Israel Communications and Research Centre (BICOM), a Zionist lobby group. When he was secretary of state for Justice and Lord Chancellor, Grayling declared war on "extremists", the working definition of which, he made clear, amounted to anyone who criticized Israel or the War on Terror.

Theresa Villiers, the British Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, and Brexiter, is an "officer" of the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) and ardent Zionist.

Iain Duncan Smith, a long standing supporter of Brexit, who resigned recently from his senior ministry in the Cameron government, also belongs to the CFI, as indeed do nearly all the leading Tory Brexiters.

Then there's Liam Fox, left, another Neocon ultra, who was forced to resign from his job as Secretary of State for Defence, after it was revealed that billionaire Israeli arms dealer, Poju Zabludowicz, was funding his jet setting playboy lifestyle, and that of his erstwhile "adviser" Adam Werrity.

It isn't just on the Tory side where Brexit goes with passionate Zionism. One of the small handful of Labour Party Brexit supporters was Gisela Stuart, a German born Zionist, and a member of the Neocon "Henry Jackson Society". Stuart received lavish media coverage throughout the campaign - courtesy of her Zionist friends at the BBC. Other Labour Brexit supporters like Kate Hoey and Frank Field, also strongly support Israel.


Then there's the media: Murdoch's soft-porn rags have fervently advocated for Brexit since well before the vote was called. Ditto the soft core porn Daily Mail, and the Daily Express, owned by Zionist hard-porn baron, Richard Desmond. The Telegraph is if anything even more Neocon than the Murdoch press, and likewise took a strong pro-Brexit stance. Even those media one might normally expect to be pro-EU adopted a distinctly ambivalent approach to the issue.

For example, the Guardian and the Independent published many articles in support of leaving the EU. By the same token, in one of the key televised debates on the Brexit issue, the BBC slanted the panel three to two in favour of Brexit. One of the two pro "spokespersons" ... was Eddie Izzard, a buffoonish and widely despised transvestite "comedian" who appeared on the panel with bright red lip stick, mascara, nail varnish and clad in a woman's jacket and blouse, and a pink beret. Not exactly an advocate designed to appeal to the undecided voters of  middle England...

(Julie Burchill of The Guardian, draped in Israeli flag, part of the pro-Brexit Pressitute corps.)

When it comes to individual journalists, the roll call of pro-Brexiters in general corresponded to the leading names in "Zio-presstitution": Julie Burchill, Douglas Murray, Charles Moore, Julia Hartley Brewer, Matthew Parris, Toby Young, Janet Daley, and even Peter Hitchens - who in spite of his stated reservations about western invasions around the world, always can be relied upon to stoutly defend the Israeli state. 

Throughout the campaign, Brexiters lamented how the establishment was ranged against them, but in truth the reverse was the reality. Indeed, ironically enough the corporate media eagerly spun the Leave campaign meme of the referendum as a David and Goliath contest between the plucky Brexit underdog and the nasty pro-EU ruling elite. Moreover, unlike the case of the Scottish independence referendum two years ago, there were very few corporate celebs rushing to support the pro-EU side.

In the Scottish referendum, almost anyone who was anyone in showbiz - Mick Jagger, Paul McCartney, Kate Moss, et al - put their name to a letter calling on Scotland to stay in the United Kingdom. No such closing of celeb ranks took place against Brexit - which in itself goes a long way to refuting the notion that Brexit was an anti-establishment cause.


So if the Zio-globalists favoured Brexit, what was their game? Not for the first time, the Russians seemed to have got closer to the reality than many of the western alternative media did.

Last week Putin suggested that Cameron had called the referendum in order to "blackmail" the rest of Europe. The evidence for this theory is compelling. It should be remembered that for all their self-serving chauvinistic rhetoric, the British Neocons don't dislike the EU on account of its control by corrupt transnationals and even more corrupt bankers: au contraire they want it to be even MORE controlled by these forces than it already is. 

The referendum was clearly a move to force the EU to undertake "root and branch reform", i.e., to surrender completely to Anglo-American Zionist warmongers and corporate privateers. In all the phoney euphoria over the Brexit result, it's easily forgotten that in so far as there has been opposition to Zionist war-mongering, surveillance and privatization within the EU, it has certainly not come from Britain.

Furthermore the desire of British Neocons to force the EU's hand is not really a secret: in the very early days of the referendum campaign, Boris Johnson and another leading Brexiter, former Tory leader, Michael Howard, both stated that a Brexit vote was a way of forcing Europe to make better terms with Britain.

For all its bellyaching, the British Zio-masonic state already gets much better terms from the EU than most European nations - not surprising since the EU is not, as British chauvinists of Hitchens' type ludicrously claim, a German imperialist project, but rather a vehicle for Anglo-American Zionist dominion.

For instance Angela Merkel agreed to take in a million refugees to Germany, while Britain has agreed to take in a paltry 20,000 over five years. By the same token the French are compelled by their Anglo-masters to oversee huge refugee camps on their northern coast - in order to prevent migrants making it to Britain.

None of the above is to in any way argue that opposition to the EU is misguided, but simply to illustrate that in this particular referendum there were no good guys. A triumph against globalism, Brexit most certainly was not.

Related- EU Disintegration Irreversible-Soros
-----------------More evidence of hidden agenda? Farage Excluded 
------------------Brexit Plan- Worldwide economic collapse?

Makow comment:  Evidently the powers that be have decided that England can be a more effective instrument of Masonic central banker world tyranny outside the EU. Possibly England, as Illuminati HQ, is to be spared some of its ravages, like integrating more migrants and bailing out Greece ad infinitum.

First Comment from Kevin Boyle:

While much of Northsider's analysis about Zionists leading both sides of the Brexit debate is correct, it is ridiculous to suggest that the Zio-plan was a Brexit victory.

This is the greatest reversal the globalist Zionist project has suffered in a very long time. The effort at shuffling all their controlled sheep under a single tent in Europe has taken (what will probably prove to be) a deadly hit. There is no way this result is a good thing for the familiar Zio-playmakers.

Now they will change their game in ways that are difficult to foresee. They may judge that it is time for a major financial collapse or, perhaps, a new mega-war ... who knows?

The good thing is that increasing numbers understand what 'government' is or, more generally, are on to the reality that the 1%, as they get called (an inflated percentage), that own government are lying thieves who do not care about the rest of us at all.

As someone who moved around the country quite a bit before the referendum I can tell you that 'LEAVE' posters were everywhere and the  'REMAIN' side had very low public visibility by comparison. My own belief is that the real margin of victory was much greater than 52-48%. 70-30% at least ... that MI5 stuffed 'Remain' ballot papers into the Postal Votes boxes in a massive way but that they failed to go far enough with their interference. That they did not realize that the majority for Brexit was so overwhelming. (Postal votes are 20% of total poll and by law MUST be mixed with normal ballot papers before counting....thereby leaving an open door for undetectable fraud as a built-in part of our system). The counting itself is carried out by ordinary honest folk and the process at this stage cannot be manipulated.

The Zionists did NOT engineer this result, though they made arrangements that "sympathetic" leader types would be around to make the right noises to pacify the angry sheep after the vote.

They miscalculated. 
The phenomenon (akin to 'Trumpism) is well described by Scottish Professor Mark Blyth here.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Brexit- What is the Hidden Globalist Game?"

Ryan said (June 26, 2016):

It seems obvious to me that the elite would secretly favor Brexit. With several European countries now vying for a possible exit from the EU; this would cause considerable chaos to not only Europe but world markets and inflame the already volatile manufactured migrant crisis/immigration situation . It seems quite clear they are sticking to their masonic mantra - Order out of chaos.

Glen said (June 26, 2016):

We should know by now when ANYTHING is presented in a positive or even semi-positive light by the masonic Jew-controlled main stream media, they are behind it for one reason or another. No matter how much the pukes like Cameron jump up and down and scream "we must remain", we must realize he is just a puppet for the masters and is more than likely vying for that which he is speaking against.

We must also realize if the controllers wanted this referendum to fail, they would have "got er done" through vote fraud, as they have done with so many referendums throughout history. One that comes to mind is the recent California GMO-Labeling Ballot known as Prop 37. As Joseph P. Farrell put it, "Frankly, when I heard that this measure had gone down to defeat in a state that can only be qualified as a "granola" state, I was rather surprised, and immediately began to suspect that there may have been fraud involved."

They used to tell us, believe none of what you hear and half of what you see. With the advent of the green screen, it is clear we will never be able to believe a single thing we are told or what we "believe" we see with our own two eyes. We really do live in a matrix that consist of nothing but a web of lies and propaganda, fed to us on a regular basis by those who own and control us.

Until we realize our political leaders are nothing more than controlled entities themselves, that they are nothing more than "Judas Goats" we will never be free. For all to become aware of the level of betrayal we as tax slaves live under I recommend a book by Michael Collins Piper titled "The Judas Goats (The Enemy Within)". What follows is the Wikipedia definition of a Judas goat.

"A Judas Goat is a term used to describe a trained goat used at a slaughterhouse and in general animal herding. The Judas goat is trained to associate with sheep or cattle, leading them to a specific destination."

"In stockyards, a Judas goat will lead sheep to slaughter, while its own life is spared. Judas goats are also used to lead other animals to specific pens and onto trucks. The term Judas Goat is derived from a biblical reference to Judas Iscariot [who betrayed Jesus Christ to the Pharisees]."

Steve said (June 26, 2016):

Excellent assessment of Brexit. I assumed this without knowing any of this. I believe for the last several millennium that the same groups have ruled and perfected it to such a degree that there is nothing in this world now that isn't purposely manipulated in every country and vote process. This includes Trump and Putin. From Egypt to Greece to Rome to the Vatican. They now have the technology and DNA control, it doesn't look good.

Below- Real Men Want Real Women (scroll down)

Exile in Thailand Better Than Exile at Home - US Retiree

June 25, 2016


Marcus who retired to Bangkok says the many drawbacks are manageable compared to the increasing "insanity of the West."




(Disclaimer- We are not endorsing sexual mores described herein.)  

by Marcus 

I am a retired businessman from the USA, now living in Thailand for 10 years.  This is encouragement for other white men that escape is possible and life outside The West can be safe and pleasant. 

 My primary goals in escaping were:

1. Escape from the worship of Negros that has overwhelmed my country, the USA.  2. Escape from Femi-Nazis.  Escape from the social construct that females are always right and men are always wrong.  3. Escape from the suffocating insanity of political correctness, "PC".  4. Escape from the mushrooming "security state".  Everywhere cameras, security inspections, ID badges, and the overwhelming gloom of suspicion.  

 I've found that life outside The West can be far more safe, and very pleasant, too. albeit not heaven on earth.  For the first year, my yearnings for warm weather, exotic food, available women, etc, were totally satisfied here.  But then, slowly, things began to go change.  My honeymoon here came to an end. 

The smiling mask of "welcome" started to come off once the locals realized that I was living here, not just visiting.  They had been happy to see me staying at an expensive hotel, eating in tourist restaurants, spending big money, and leaving tips.  But they were not so pleased to see me at the local supermarket buying bread, cheese, and mayonnaise to make lunch at home.   I hadn't expected that change in attitude.  

Staying in a hotel is wonderful:  inviting swimming pool, maid service every morning, room service 24 hours.  On the other hand, renting a local apartment is quite different.   Yes, a swimming pool, but the water is dirty green because the filter hasn't been cleaned in months.  Hiring a maid to to clean and do laundry is awkward if you don't speak her  language.   Plus, finding a maid who won't steal too much is even more difficult.  Those cheese sandwiches are far less glamorous than room service.  So full time living here is not at all like a vacation holiday.  Still, compared to the risks "back home", I'll stay here.


The surrounding culture here can be difficult in unexpected ways. For example, in The West we expect most things to work, most of the time.  If something doesn't work, we expect someone to come and fix it: elevator, traffic light, restaurant meal gone wrong.  Whatever it is, we assume it will be fixed.


Not like that out here.  In Thailand, things often just don't work as expected.  And if I say something -- perhaps I ordered a chocolate milk shake, but was served strawberry flavor -- they don't want to know about it.  To them, even a small mistake is a big embarrassment.   To avoid the embarrassment, they avoid knowing. 

And, often, they don't know how to fix things that have gone wrong.   So, in order to avoid embarrassment, their response is often stunningly irrational.  For example, sometimes, the elevators in my condo building just stop working for a few minutes.  They don't fall down with a crash, but just stop moving up or down.   Nobody does anything, because nobody knows what to do.  In response, building management put up signs saying something like, "These elevators are professionally maintained.  Don't panic.  You are perfectly safe."  Doesn't solve the problem, but management can say, "We put up signs!  What more do you want?"  Putting up signs is a frequent response to things not working.  Actually making repairs happens far less.  And preventive maintenance, almost never.  

In The West we assume that most people will be honest most of the time.  Not all the time, and not all people, but most.  Out here that assumption is reversed.  Here most people lie, most of the time.  

As for Political Correctness, there is very little risk from that.  Of course, all governments everywhere wish to limit what individuals can say in public.  Now, here in Thailand, with a military government, you might think there are police behind every palm tree listening to what people are saying.  I live in Bangkok.  Can't remember the last time I saw a policeman -- other than weekday afternoons, in front of the nearby school, directing traffic.   

There is, however, one limit to speech here.  Unlike PC, where there are lots of restrictions in the US, here the limit is very clear:  Local people may not talk about the military government.  That's it.  Easy to follow.  But back in The West, what can a white man talk about?  So many topics are "forbidden" by political correctness and the topics change so often.  Protected minorities can say anything at all, but a white man must endure in silent acceptance, or else risk losing his job, or possible arrest, or something else very unpleasant.

Here, unless one violates that one, forbidden, topic mentioned above, chances are you will never be bothered by the "security state".  


So, what about the women?  White men in The West have been starved for female attention for so long, that even just a hint of a smile can feel like true love.  Here in Thailand, there are a lot of smiles.  But, please, be careful.  A smile here is usually just a gesture of greeting, just a way to say, "hello", nothing more.  Still, for an older, white man, even a smile like that is so much better than what's available to us in The West these days.


Is there anything behind the smiles of the women here?  Well, yes, it's true, sex is easily available.  But it is also true that a man is expected to pay for it.   Here, they don't "fall in love".  To have sex with a woman is easy.  But to have sex without paying, one way or another, is dangerous.  The payment is a measure of the woman's self-worth.  If you don't pay, she feels severely damaged, as if she had been robbed and raped.  Here, if that happens, watch out!

Beyond the sex, what are the females like?  In all my observations, most are empty-headed.   But not stupid.  Quite clever, actually, in some ways.    Sparkling, witty, funny, too.   But anything resembling intelligence or rational thinking is just not on the menu here.  Compared to back in The West, that's no problem.  I hadn't seen anything resembling rational thinking in Western females for many years.  Here, none of that either, but easy sex, and with far less risk.  I can bear it.

If you are interested in more conversation about these topics, I've asked Henry to provide my email address below. 

[email protected]

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Exile in Thailand Better Than Exile at Home - US Retiree "

Magda said (June 25, 2016):

Your writer today Marcus has left the US for reasons similar to those for which many "privileged" minorities leave and more. It would have been interesting for myself if he had realized that many do not feel privileged but are in a similar condition. We are all being played against each other and no one feels safe from persecution. Also, there is nothing offensive about his article except his self oppression in paying for something that shouldn't be paid for. PS Malaysia is better run than his description of Thailand and he would have been married by now with kids in a loving marriage had he wished it. Many women in most countries need husbands and want kids.)

To Marcus: I understand your frustration, but you will NEVER find a geographical solution to what is said (June 25, 2016):

To Marcus: I understand your frustration, but you will NEVER find a geographical solution to what is a spiritual dilemma everywhere in this world, which is fallen and corrupt by design. My fantasy used to be one of living in a different time, pre-feminist. pre-PC, pre-beast system etc. Sounds great, but impossible, and those times had their drawbacks, too.

Seek first the Kingdom of God and know that He wins in the end. Just my humble 2 cents, hopefully without getting preachy. The problem of being alienated from women and being isolated is no small thing. Where I am, people actually get married young and stay that way! Great, but I'm a transplant, so there's nothing left for me. After a while, you begin to realize that women aren't everything, and the more you fixate on not having a wife, the more miserable you become. OK, that's all.

Below- Paean to My Wife (scroll down)

Real Men Want Real Women

June 24, 2016


Ronald Samartino, 71, the father of
three daughters thinks Mark's description
women. He has distorted Mark's message
but we are not about imposing one view.
We leave that to feminists. Ronald's take 
is resonant of real life.

 "Mark wants some uneducated, dingbat, whose only passions are housecleaning and cooking and gardening and saying "Yes, dear."--Wow, he sounds to me like someone who is threatened by women, who feels a bizarre need to hold them down and needs constant ego boosts from the female in order to feel manly. It's a very distorted and unenlightened perception of life, of the value of human lives, and of the universe."

by Ronald Samartino

I would've been embarrassed to tell my wife that her entire precious existence on this earth--was meant only to serve me. I never regarded my wife in that way which seems pretty disrespectful. I saw her as an individual with hopes, dreams, desires, aims, just like me, not some slave. If you need a woman to clean up after you to feel manly, you got a problem.

I feel like these articles are written by men who don't have daughters. My wife and I had three girls, and NEVER did I say, now here's a fine slave for some man. 

No, sorry. Real men want real women. I didn't even question it--and I grew up in a pre-feminist era. I'm 71 years old, but it never crossed my mind to raise subservient, uneducated, ignorant humans, whose lives revolve around another human male without any interests or goals or aims. 

Are you kidding? My wife and I raised intellectual, kind, caring young women who knew how to take care of themselves, make their own money, not--NEVER to depend on a man, but to also take care of their future families in a loving, caring atmosphere. 

They saw me their father helping their mother with everything around the house. Again, I was raised pre-feminist era, now widowed after 43 years of marriage--and I NEVER had to be told to help out around the house. To me it was NOT, you're the female you do these jobs and I do this and you cater to me so I can feel like a "REAL" man.

My wife and I were a TEAM. We were in it TOGETHER, raising and taking care of OUR family, OUR home. When money was tight, my wife worked, and she and I were both happy that she did. And when money wasn't tight, she worked, because she wanted to and she was her own person--you know, someone with their OWN, INDIVIDUAL thoughts and desires. 

My wife worked right alongside me when we decided to build one of the homes we lived in over the years. She was amazing--that's a REAL woman, a loving mother, who will work for her family, who's independent and regarded as an EQUAL. 

I didn't have to be asked to help around the house---I WANTED to help, if dinner wasn't ready I cooked it, I enjoy cooking. I helped clean and do laundry, I changed diapers, we did all the work EQUALLY, because we loved each other and our family, and we strove together to make our home nice for our children. We were EQUAL partners. That's being a REAL man, not this phoney divisiveness that is just as extreme and wrong as the militant feminism is.

And any REAL man who has daughters sure as hell doesn't--does NOT, want them to be mere slaves to another man, even if he's the greatest, nicest man in the world. It's a sickening thought as a father. 


I watched as my daughters grew and they spoke of their passions and interests and the jobs they wanted--and I'm bewildered how any man could possibly want to smother his daughter's ambitions, or prevent them from having an education, inhibit their own individual human wonder and enlightenment. You really have to have something wrong with you--honestly, to subvert a human being like that.

By the way, I was raised Catholic, came from a nuclear family. My mother worked a full-time job as did my father. My wife was catholic--not a feminist, same age as me; we both grew up in the pre-feminist era, high school sweethearts. But never did I even EVER think of using the bible written in archaic unenlightened times as my guide on how to treat a woman--I didn't and still don't believe my wife belonged to me, we chose each other and I valued her as a person, as someone who deserved as much respect as me--and vice versa. 

And for any men who are reading these Makow articles and are unmarried, hoping to find a nice woman, I would disregard all of it as purest bull$hit, because that's what it is. If you really love someone, you want them to be a true equal, not something like chattel that you feel you can boss around so you can delude yourself with some false sense of power as "head of the house". 

If you need that, if you need a slave to care for your clothes and clean your house and revolve you to feel manly, then you're missing the big picture. A REAL man, can handle a NON-SLAVE woman, and loves the fact that she is an equal. 

Makow comment- It's a shame that Ronald needs to distort our position in order to make his point. Mark and I do not regard women as inferior or slaves. On the contrary, in a traditional marriage there is an exchange of female worldly power for male love. The woman and man become one. The husband consults and cherishes his wife as part of him and wants to see her happy and thrive in every respect. That's what love is. Love does not succeed when husband and wife compete as neutered "equals." 

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Real Men Want Real Women"

RE said (June 26, 2016):

Just a quick response to your article by Ronald. I got a few years on him and also raised children.

However, Ronald would have made a good 'poster boy' for the feminist movement. With a catholic

background in liberal theology, I can see why he does not want to follow God's instruction manual.

We all have to give an account to our Creator when the time comes. I wonder what his excuse will be?

Take care and God bess,

GT said (June 25, 2016):

This is just a progressive indulging in virtue-signalling. Aside from distorting Mark's article, he has no idea whatsoever about what women really desire in a man. What he advocates is the same old egalitarian unisex nonsense that has screwed up marriage for the past half a century or so. Moreover, the fact that he so grossly misrepresents Mark's and your position raises questions about the veracity of his entire article.

Mark H said (June 25, 2016):

I would stand for Marks position because I see there harmony.
I'm so tired to fight outside of my house and if I need do it inside of my house too ... it will choking me to death.
It's not rocket science to live in harmony , all starts from altar ...
Mark and you have decrypted that so many times.

PV said (June 24, 2016):

Samartino, is right when he says men/husband and women/wife deserve to achieve the same level of quality of life. I agree with him when he says that is wrong to think that women/wife must a inferior status than men/husband.

But also Makow and the usual readers of the blog are right when they state that men/husband are not equal, don't have the same personality, goals in life of women/wife.

I think the real problem is the meaning of word «equal». Both sexes must have same level of achievement in life but shouldn't have the same choices, preferences paths in life. By the way, I think Makow and the readers agree with me.

Barbara W said (June 24, 2016):

I liked Mark's simple paean to his wife, but I did not like Ronald's article at all. It could easily have been written by his feminist wife or daughters, who have evidently led him a merry dance all these years.
It is HE who seems the brainwashed domestic slave, to these four women in his life!
I have seen this before in relationships of feminist acquaintances; for example:

- husband works, wife stays at home, refuses to have children, makes him do the housework as well
- husband & wife both work to support their children, wife makes husband & kids do all the cooking & housework, while wife relaxes
- husband works, wife stays at home raising children, if husband disagrees with wife in any way, he comes home to find his dinner thrown into the bin as passive-aggressive "revenge"
- husband works, wife works part-time, if husband & children dare to complain of hunger pangs because wife didn't bother to cook dinner, next day all their dinners get thrown into the bin, as "revenge"
- husband works, wife stays home, but still demands his pay packet, control of all his money, total control of every aspect of interior furnishings, and makes him spend his leisure time doing household repair jobs, or else nagging him about it
- husband comes home tired but cheerful, wife greets him in a rage over something he said 5 weeks ago

It is WE, ladies, who need to change. As Mark Thomas said in his book, "Not Guilty: In Defence of Modern Man", domestic violence has two forms: physical and psychological, and women's psychological abuse and domination of men also counts as "domestic violence".

MM said (June 24, 2016):

Looks to me like Ronald has completely misinterpreted Mark's post of yesterday. "Uneducated"? "Dingbat"? "Threatened by women"? I didn't get any of that from Mark's post. I thought Mark's post was just what it said it was: a loving tribute to a wonderful wife. As for Ronald, the lady doth protest too much.

Tony B said (June 24, 2016):

This guy may have been a Catholic in name but his thinking is entirely pagan. In fact he disparages the principles, both written and traditional, which Catholics live by. His belief system may accurately be labeled "pagan Americanism" or "American paganism," comes out the same.

Dan said (June 24, 2016):

I'm perplexed by Ronald's reaction to Mark's marriage. I can only surmise that he misunderstood. I just read Mark' article again and I just don't get the image of a "dingbat, who's only passions are housecleaning and cooking and gardening and saying "Yes, dear."

Roland's created a straw man and named it 'Mark'. It's uncharitable to put words in other people's mouths. Not an persuasive argument strategy either.


The Latest news from Brazil by Marcos

June 23, 2016

The Olympics will be a failure. Rio is dirty, chaotic and dangerous. Ironically, the scare that everybody is talking about, zika virus, is a hoax, as nobody is sick in the city. It is easier to get shot than to get the virus. Be as it may, the motto for the games has been chosen:   A New World (Order).

by Marcos

Glenn Greenwald now has a good excuse for writing lies in Russian government websites, defending the corrupt Marxist government of Brazil: he did it for love.

His Brazilian gay lover, David Miranda, will run for Rio's City Council by the PSOL party, a radical marxist party which supports Dilma's Workers's Party. It is a bunch of deranged communists. One of its founders was Achille Loro, an Italian terrorist who set fire to the sons of an adversary (one of them an 8 year-old boy) but fled to Brazil. 

This happened in the same week the country found out that another ally, the Communist Party, was getting 30% in bribes in housing construction projects for the poor they say they protect. Becoming a leftist politician means being on the receiving end of a never ending flow of financial help, bribes and all kinds of subsidies for parties and NGOs. It doesn't matter that the country may be bankrupt and people starving. Greenwald's lover has his retirement plan set.

With little more than a month to go to the Olympics, Rio is officially bankrupt and not paying its (too many) public employees. Last week, a gang of drug dealers with automatic rifles and grenades invaded a hospital and rescued one of their brethren, killing a passer-by and wounding others. It was also revealed that criminals patrol the avenue from the airport to town, with machine guns and rifles. Any foreign dignitary coming to the Games will pass right in front of their rifle scopes.

Today the former Minister of Planning for Dilma, Paulo Bernardo, was arrested. The man is also the husband of a Workers Party senator who is in the front of Dilma's defense. He was stealing from public pensioners and sharing his gains with the party. Dilma is being impeached for one crime, but she has six other crimes that can be used against her. The woman is such a mafia boss that even the motorcycle of a friend who became famous by giving her rides in Brasilia was confiscated by the police.

As predicted in this site, the only potential conservative candidate (not aligned with the globalists) for 2018 elections, Bolsonaro, a former Army parachuter captain,  was framed and may not run anymore. Some time ago, a Marxist Congresswoman called him falsely a rapist, and he said jokingly that he would never rape her because she was too ugly. Bad taste, maybe, but a joke in response to defamation (this, a real crime). The Leftist Supreme Court judges want to strip him of political rights for that. These judges are puppets of the Workers Party and have been sitting on Lula's lawsuit for months.

What is interesting is that we know now why there was so much effort and propaganda from the Left about the fake rape of a girl in Rio last month. It was a frenzy. They needed the public outcry in order to convict Bolsonaro, because otherwise it would have been too clear that the judges were doing the work for political reasons. A masterful plan.

There is no end to the flow of news about corruption and scandals, now that Dilma can't stop the investigations. Huge mobile company "Oi", the one which paid bribes to Lula's son, went bankrupt, leaving debts of US$ 20 BI. Most of the debt is conveniently with state banks (approved by Lula) so the poor citizens will carry the burden. 

In another scandal, it was discovered that the presidential campaign and the jet for Marina Silva (Prince Phillip's darling) and her partner Eduardo Campos were paid with bribes. The jet went down in 2014 with candidate Campos in it. Now the head of the bribe scandal was found "suicided" in a motel in his home state of Pernambuco. The only viable candidate left seems to be Aecio Neves, about whom Lord Rothschild said he would be the future president of Brazil.

The chaos and misery we see in Brazil are prototypes of what is coming to the rest of the world. Marxism creates scorched earth so the new world order can advance quicker. Watch and learn.


June 19, 2016


A talk by Jeanice Barcelo, left, about the plot to effectuate dramatic changes in our sexual behavior and attitudes. Jeanice shows pornography is a product of satanic occultism. 

Description by Jeanice:  

Tonight I came across an article stating that 40% of U.S. babies are born to unmarried women.  This article was rather shocking in its content and reminded me of how important it is for people to understand the forces that have driven the concept of "family" into the gutter and used us to create a world that is filled with single parents, fatherless children and endless suffering from the wounds of abandonment and rejection.

In my double DVD set on pornography and the deliberate manipulation of human sexuality, I show how the Luciferian bloodlines have orchestrated the mind control of the American people and totally altered our beliefs and behavior in the realm of sex and relationships. The dark forces did this with the help of Professor Alfred Kinsey (pedophile and sadomasochist) who, through his child raping "research," claimed that children are "sexual from birth," and can benefit from having sex with adults. Kinsey also claimed that women are like cats in heat -- although the difference between human females and felines is that cats "have sex" in order to reproduce, whereas, according to Kinsey, human women just want to get off -- all the time, as much as possible, and without restraint. 

According to Kinsey, what women really want is unrestrained physical pleasure and to hell with the spiritual and psychic consequences of their carnal activity (which consequences include the murder of infants while they are still in the womb as well as the birth of billions of haphazardly conceived children who are gestated in wombs where they are not wanted and who are imprinted for life with the idea that they are not loved and not lovable and will never be loved or wanted).

Kinsey's "research" was cited by Hugh Hefner in the first publication of Playboy, which was released the very same year Kinsey's book about female sexuality was released (1953). All of this was orchestrated and paid for by the Rockefeller Foundation (i.e., the Rockenfelders who are Luciferian Jews). This was also the basis of the "sexual revolution" and the "women's liberation" movement, which led to the legalization of abortion and the creation of the highly satanic and evil organization known as Planned Parenthood.

In just 50 years after the publication of Kinsey's research (along with the mainstreaming of pornography into American culture by Luciferian Jews), the number of women giving birth to children who will likely be fatherless jumped from 3.8% to more than 40%. This is because women have bought into the lies about so-called "female sexuality" and "women's lib" and have come to believe their carnal activity is good for them and the way the Creator wanted it. Nothing could be further from the Truth. And American children (as well as children worldwide) are suffering.

To learn more about what I have just shared, I encourage you to check out my double DVD set and share the information widely. People need to understand what is being done to us -- and the fact that these same Luciferian forces have now moved pornography into kindergarten classrooms (with the help of Planned Parenthood's "Comprehensive Sexual Education Program," of course) should concern us greatly. This "curriculum" is preparing children for pedophilia -- which is exactly what Kinsey and the Rockefellers were after all along.

Here is a link to check out the DVD set.  Thank you for taking the time to check it out.

"Anti-Semitism" Trickery by Bishop Williamson

June 18, 2016

images (51).jpeg
Is "antisemite" wielded like a sword?  Just ask the wielder to define the word.

by Bishop Williamson

There are treacherous words which seem to mean one thing and are used to mean quite another. One of the most treacherous words of all is "anti-semitism." The word seems to mean opposition to all Jews purely and simply because they are Jews, and in this sense it rightly condemns something bad, because some Jews are wicked, but certainly not all. On the other hand it is often used to condemn absolutely any opposition to anything that any Jews do, and then the word is wrongly condemning something good, because whenever Jews do anything bad then opposition to them is good. But do Jews do things bad? Obviously. They created Islam for Arabs, Freemasonry for Gentiles and Communism for the modern world, all three primarily to fight Jesus Christ and Christianity, and so send souls to Hell.

A book which all Catholics should read who wish to defend the Church against Islam, Freemasonry and Communism, now Globalism, is The Plot Against the Church by Maurice Pinay. The book was written just before Vatican II to be put into the hands of all Council Fathers, to warn them of the great danger in which the Church would find herself at the Council. Sure enough. The Council Fathers ended up praising Islam (Unitatis Redintegratio),adopting Freemasonic principles (Dignitatis Humanae) and never mentioning, still less condemning, the evil system of Communism. Here is how in his Chapter on "Antisemitism and Christianity" Maurice Pinay analyses the treachery of the word "antisemitism":--

Down the ages the Jews have always used vague words with a variety of meanings, writes Pinay, to snare Gentile minds and so prevent them from defending themselves against the Jewish drive towards world domination in that 2,000-year war on Christianity which he carefully documents throughout his book. So in a first stage, by three arguments they seek to prevail upon Gentile leaders to condemn "antisemitism" in its first sense, given above, of opposition to everything and everybody Jewish: firstly, Christ, by establishing the equality of all men before God, condemned any such degrading of a whole race; secondly, Christ told all men to "love one another"; thirdly, Christ and his Mother were both Jewish.

But in a second stage the Jews, having once obtained the Gentiles' condemnation of a vague "antisemitism," then proceed to give the word a quite different meaning, the second sense above, of any and all opposition to anything whatsoever that Jews do. Thus "antisemites" become: all patriots exerting their right of self-defence against Jewish subversion of their country; all defenders of the family against the errors and vices of all sorts fomented by the Jews to dissolve it (e.g. abortion, pornography); all Catholics defending their holy religion against every form of corruption being openly or secretly promoted by the Jews to undermine it; all truth-tellers unmasking Jews as the originators of Freemasonry and Communism (now of Globalism and feminism, etc.); and all people in general opposing Jewish subversion of the Church and of Christian civilisation. And by their control of politics, finance, films and above all by their media, the Jews have succeeded in giving such an electric charge to this one little word "anti-semite," that it is enough to electrocute anyone that it touches.

But who is foolish enough to have allowed them to control politics and finance? Who has allowed them to virtually monopolise the film industry and the media? Who thinks it is so smart to have done away with all censorship and is now co-operating with them to enable them to censor the Internet? Gentile liberals in every case, who are therefore being enslaved, by the minute, in their New World Order. Doctor, cure thyself! For who that reads their newpapers or watches their television programmes has anybody to blame but himself for letting them take over his mind,and his civilisation?

Catholics, read The Plot against the Church. If anybody is accusing you of being an "antisemite," it is quite possible you have reason to be proud.

Kyrie eleison.