by Henry Makow Ph.D.

(From August, 2002, Revised July 18, 2008)

"It is absurd to say our country can issue bonds and cannot issue currency. Both are promises to pay, but one fattens the usurer and the other helps the people."  --Thomas Edison

International bankers live in fear.

Not of starvation, disease or war. These are the concerns of children in the Third World.

Bankers are terrified we might object to paying them billions each year in interest for money they create out of nothing, guaranteed by our taxes. (The Federal Reserve Board, a private cartel of mostly foreign banks, finagled this monopoly in 1913.)

The bankers are frightened that, like the homeless man's dog, we might say, "I can do this myself."

They are scared the government might go even further and "default" on trillions of make-believe "debt."

They are frightened of losing "control." They toss and turn at night.

In order to sleep more soundly, the bankers have taken "steps."

These precautions help us to understand the world we live in, why it is becoming safer for bankers but less safe and more bizarre for everyone else.

First, people who own money machines tend to have a lot of friends. The bankers helped their friends establish monopolies in oil, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, transportation, media,etc. and took a healthy stake. As you can imagine, these people are thick as thieves. Lawyers, journalists and intellectuals all vie for a piece of the action. (Servicing this cartel of cartels is what passes for "success" these days.)

The bankers' first precaution is to buy all the politicians. The second is to buy the major media outlets in order to promote the illusion politicians make decisions and represent our interests. The third precaution is to take control of the education system, ensuring that people stop thinking at an early age.

Then the bankers use the government and media to convince us that religion, nationalism and nuclear family are unfashionable, and we want what they want.

We "want" world government ("globalization"). The bankers need to eliminate nation states, freedom and democracy in order to streamline their business and consolidate their power. The UN, the IMF and World Bank, -- glorified loan sharks and collectors -- will make the laws.

We "want" secularism and the separation of church and state. Even though we were fine with Christianity and Christian values for centuries, the bankers don't want any authority to challenge their satanic decree.

We "want" diversity. Countries are not allowed to maintain their national identities or traditions. Last Christmas, my provincial Premier tried to rename the Christmas tree at the legislature a "multicultural tree." Diversity is respecting every culture but our own. Every nation must be heterogeneous as a box of Smarties -- no one in a position to challenge the bankers.

Or take "feminism." Masquerading as equal rights for women, this ideology is designed to spread lesbian dysfunction. If women focus on careers, it means they give less importance to husband and children. They have fewer or no children who will be raised in state day cares.

Under the guise of "womens" and  "gay" rights we are being re engineered to behave like homosexuals, easier to control. Psychological and biological differences between men and women are not "stereotypes." But signatories to the latest UN "CEDAW" Convention ( passed by the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee) will be required to "take all appropriate measures to modify all social and cultural patterns of conduct of men and women." (Article 5)

This kind of Communist-inspired social engineering is simply persecution of heterosexuals. It is intended to arrest our natural development: the birth rate has halved while the divorce rate has doubled. An army of highly paid lawyers, social workers and bureaucrats treat the casualties. These self-serving do-gooders are the bankers' biggest constituency.

People --stunted, love-starved, sex-obsessed -- without family, religious or national identity, are easy to control. (They'll join anything; they're looking for a family.) But in case of resistance, the bankers have created a bogeyman, "terrorism" to justify a huge security apparatus.

The Office of Homeland Security is designed to control us -- the domestic population. Why would this be necessary? We're "in debt" trillions of dollars and the bankers intend that we pay. One day they will take away our toys. In case that's a problem, an Orwellian police state will be in place. But first,the Muslims must be subjugated and robbed.

Talking about the United States as if it were an independent country is silly. American politicians pawned U.S. sovereignty in 1913. Ever since, U.S. soldiers have been bullyboys for international bankers, and nothing else.

SUPERPOWER AS BANKER GO'FER

The American taxpayer and soldier made the First World War possible. It started just six months after the establishment of the "Fed". Its purpose was to increase debt, cripple the great European nation states, slaughter a generation, and establish two of the bankers' pet projects: Communism (Russia) and Zionism (Palestine.) After the war ended, banker world government -- The League of Nations (a.k.a., "The League to Enforce Peace") was established.

The US didn't enter the Second World War in Dec. 1941 to save Western Civilization. England had stood alone against Germany for more than two years. The U.S. entered the war just six months after Hitler attacked Russia. The purpose was to save Communism! [I am indebted to A.K. Chesterton ("The New Unhappy Lords," 1969) for this insight] For the same reason, the USSR got $5 billion in U.S. lend-lease after the war ended.

After the smoke cleared, Communists instead of Nazis tyrannized Eastern Europe. Soviet agents/ US diplomats Alger Hiss and Harry Hopkins established the United Nations on land donated by John D. Rockefeller. One of the UN's first acts was to create the State of Israel.

Ben Hecht (in A Child of the Century) wrote "the Twentieth Century was cut off at its knees by World War One." Before committing suicide in 1942, Stefan Zweig (The World of Yesterday) spoke in the same tones about the demise of Western Civilization.

The planet has been hijacked. Our leaders are dupes, opportunists, traitors or all three. Almost everything we know about modern history is a hoax. A stench of moral compromise hangs over our public and cultural life. Anything promoted by the media, education, or government is suspect. This is what happens when we deny Moral Order i.e. God.

This is what our children will inherit, a world that is safe ... for international bankers.

----

Related: "Louis McFadden, An American Hero"  by Richard Cook

O pardon me, thou bleeding piece of earth,
That I am meek and gentle with these butchers!
Thou art the ruins of the noblest
who ever lived in the tide of times.
Woe to the hand that shed this costly blood!
(Julius Caesar, Act 3:1)

A Moment of Reflection ...

If only we in Canada had an ounce of Marc Antony's outrage when it comes to murder in our midst.

All the "honorable men" who slew Caesar had the weight of law on their side, as do the officials of church and state in our country who legally killed generations of innocent children in the "Indian residential schools", and who now absolve themselves of their crime.

Can we dare to ask for pardon from the slaughtered children, for our meek gentleness with their butchers?

Can we ask them to forgive us, when we watch a recent CBC TV broadcast in which Irene Favel described seeing a newborn baby shoved live into a roaring furnace by a priest in Saskatchewan, and we do nothing?

Why should we be forgiven? Who are we to issue an "apology" for our crimes when we refuse to be held accountable for them? When names are not allowed to be named? When priests and nuns are allowed to get away with murder? And when "misconduct" in residential schools cannot even be referred to at the government's upcoming "Truth and Reconciliation" hearings?

Crimes without criminals. Words without substance. That is the Canadian way.

Looking Back, and Forward:
Written on Squamish Nation Territory, under Foreign Occupation - July 21, 2008

Over the past year, the impossible has happened: the government and churches of Canada have been forced for the first time to publicly acknowledge that massive numbers of children died in their Indian residential schools, and that many of these deaths were criminal in nature.

But the predictable has accompanied the impossible: the very same guilty parties have responded to this exposure by effectively absolving themselves of this crime with a verbal "apology" and a self-appointed "inquiry" that is structured to ensure that the crime will be officially whitewashed.

Nothing less can be expected in a place like Canada, where the institutions that ran the residential schools are still in power and call the shots, with the help of their aboriginal collaborators.

But rather than being a cause of despair, this predictable scramble by the guilty to hide their filth is yet another crumbling piece of masonry in the collapsing facade called colonial Canada, which has never resolved what it likes to call its "Indian Problem" - and never will.

Only in an insecure and guilt-haunted nation could the fact of missing aboriginal children generate the enormous turmoil and change that we've witnessed in Canada since April of 2007, when the Harper government was forced to address the missing residential school children in Parliament.

The media scramble that resulted, and has never abated, hovers around the issue of dead residential school kids like a voyeuristic John, watching but not daring to touch all those mass graves. And yet two years ago, the topic was strictly forbidden and censored in the monopolized corporate media in Canada. Today, the Establishment seems to be struggling to gradually acclimatize the populace to the fact of genocide in their midst.

This is all a repeat, but on a bigger scale, of what was tried a decade or more ago, when the first lawsuits by residential school survivors threatened to nail the Catholic, Anglican and United churches to the wall. By slowly leaking to the public some aspects of the residential school nightmare in small, digestible pieces, the media and the courts contained the potentially-explosive issue to yet another ho-hum abuse litigation, complete with "apologies" and "compensation".

Back then, by reducing genocide to a matter of personal injury claims, Canada spared itself what it's now forced to face: its own history of deliberately exterminating aboriginal nations. But, then as now, the strategy of the guilty churches and state seems to be identical: namely, to minimize and contain the issue by pretending to address it whole not addressing it.

Just as the so-called "Aboriginal Healing Fund" contained the fallout of residential school lawsuits with hush money to survivors, so now does the misnamed "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" (TRC) appear to inquire into missing children by studiously preventing any actual disclosure of their fate.

A simple reading of the TRC mandate reveals an alarming deception. While portraying itself as the definitive investigation into Indian residential schools, the TRC in fact is not an investigative body or a legal inquiry; it has no power to subpoena or compel involvement, does not allow the naming of the names of perpetrators, and will not allow any statement involving wrongdoing by a person or organization; nor does it extend immunity or protection to anyone offering evidence.

In short, the TRC is an explicit whitewash of any criminal behaviour in the residential schools. Imagine a "final report" on these schools that has not a single mention of misconduct in it!

Again, this is precisely what one expects when church lawyers and officials like the United Church's former Moderator Bill Phipps - a TRC convenor - establish an inquiry into themselves. And yet, this whole effort by the guilty is doomed to failure.

For one thing, the crime is too huge to contain. Since April 10, we have documented and released to the press thirty-three mass grave sites across Canada near former residential schools, where countless children are reputedly buried. In response, I have been inundated with stories from eyewitnesses who buried children, witnessed the incineration of others, and who saw killings and other crimes in the schools. And many of these stories have appeared in the media.

But what is especially encouraging and unusual about this disclosure is that it is being accompanied by a new wave of lawsuits against the churches responsible for these deaths, brought by relatives of children who were killed. For the first time, the churches and government of Canada are being named in criminal lawsuits for acts of murder.

It gets even better. In some cases, like on Squamish territory in what whites call Vancouver, these lawsuits will be launched not through Canadian courts of law, which have time and again disqualified claims involving murder, but in aboriginal courts of Justice, convened by traditional elders like Squamish Chief Kiapilano.

In other words, raising the spectre of murdered children is unleashing a revolutionary challenge to Canada and its courts, as survivors and other native people invoke their own sovereignty to win justice.

This fact raises the second problem of Canada's attempt to co-opt and contain its culpability for genocide: namely, that there is no consensus "at the top" of how to deal with the threat of indigenous sovereignty. The power of the Canadian establishment is too fractured and regionalized to devise a common response to the growing breakdown of native peoples' imprisonment in their own land.

Today, the Canadian state does not have a single, credible group of collaborating native elites to impose a uniform "Indian policy" across the nations, which means that any effort to simply shut down or contain the furor over missing residential school children will meet with failure. The growing native populaces, restless, off reserve and plagued by poverty and discontent, are too diverse to be so easily managed anymore.

This fact highlights the third roadblock to any easy resolution of the residential school crimes: the particularly vulnerable position of Canada in the world economy as an exporting and tourist nation, and the battering its "humanitarian" image and credit rating have taken as a result of the residential school scandal.

One of the main reasons behind the creation of the fraudulent "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" was the need to create a convincing public relations front to the world during the period leading up to the 2010 Olympics in British Columbia, a region that is the hotbed of independent native protest and non-treatied communities.

The Canadian elites - native and white - are terrified of the prospect of native road and railway blockades during the B.C. Olympics, disrupting as these will the "new relationship" between these elites in their efforts to secure new foreign export markets for Canadian resources, most of which are located on unceded native land. An upstart aboriginal bourgeoisie is acting as the chief arm of the Canadian state in securing these markets, especially with Asian countries, and restraining protests by their own people in the process.

Nevertheless, all of these factors add up to a single truth: Canada and its churches - and their aboriginal accomplices - will be unable to extricate themselves from their liability for their crimes, and therefore will remain extremely vulnerable to any public criticism or protest campaigns aimed at exposing the full extent of the residential school genocide.

The Implications for Us, and the Challenge

Until recently, the movement to bring Canada and its churches to justice for genocide has been localized and relatively unpopular, even among supposed "progressives and radicals". And yet its impact on events has been profound, and has forced Canada's back to the wall, simply by continuing to make public the hard evidence of death and torture in residential schools.

This work is finally paying off, as our efforts are stimulating a much broader reaction among even mainstream Canadians, and we are linking up with more disgruntled residential school survivors and aboriginal youth. There are now twenty six local groups across Canada working with our network, organizing protests, documenting evidence, and educating the world about the Canadian holocaust.

As the frustration of survivors continues to grow with their loss of any avenue for resolving their claims, as the bogus "TRC" exposes itself as Canada's version of the Warren Commission, and as the puppet native chiefs continue to become alienated from their own people, a huge crisis of leadership is emerging in the aboriginal world.

This crisis has created a unique opportunity for those committed to indigenous sovereignty and full justice for residential school survivors. What is lacking is the audacity, the networks, and the overall strategy to begin uprooting the causes of genocide and the colonial political-economic system that is ruining our lands and people.

Last April 15, ten indigenous elders launched their answer to the government's TRC: an independent "International Human Rights Tribunal into Genocide in Canada". That Tribunal will begin its work this autumn, by convening local inquiries into deaths and other crimes in residential schools, in open opposition to the TRC.

As part of its work, this Tribunal will begin enforcing the Eviction Notices issued by Squamish hereditary Chief Kiapilano against the Catholic, Anglican and United churches on his territory, in "Vancouver". We will claim these buildings and lands as our Mohawk cousins are doing in their land reclamation battle in "Ontario". And within these liberated zones, we will be establishing popular courts of justice to try and convict those persons and organizations responsible for the residential school crimes.

Until September 15, I will be travelling in Europe and elsewhere to gain new international allies for this campaign and cause. Let us begin planning for this "hot autumn" by planning local Tribunals and direct actions of sovereignty and reclamation in all of our communities, against the churches, corporations and government responsible for the murder of our peoples.

May our hearts and courage rise to this challenge. Spread the fire.

I am your brother,

Kevin Annett Eagle Strong Voice
for the Tribunal and sovereignty campaign

hiddenfromhistory@yahoo.ca
www.hiddenfromhistory.org

In Defence of Danish manhood.

by Philip Jones

I remember as a small boy being completely enthralled by the Hollywood Movie, `The Vikings` starring Kirk Douglas, Tony Curtis and the beautiful Janet Leigh. I must have been around seven years old at the time I first viewed this epic, and in many ways, it stimulated in me a life long interest in history generally and that of Northern Europe particularly. Many books have been written about the `terrible` and fierce men of the north; The `Norsemen` or more famously, `The Vikings`. Such books are generally filled with descriptions of immensely tall, strong and brutal warriors with names like `Harald Bluetooth, Sveyn Forkbeard, Canute the Great, and Brodir. I think it fair to say that these men were not projecting their masculinity due to any deeply felt feelings of insecurity about their manhood.

By the time I moved to Denmark back in 1995, I had been thoroughly immersed in and fascinated by Viking History, myths and legends for the greater part of thirty years. It is fair to say that I was looking forward to seeing the homeland of my childhood heroes for myself. and I was looking forward to actually meeting the descendants of the Vikings. Real men, the sons of warriors.

Now before I continue, I must make it clear that what comes next is not intended as a degradation of Danish men at all . Quite the contrary. But it must also be said that what I found upon arriving in Denmark was not quite what I had expected. Within a short space of time, I was asking the question; "Where were the sons of Odin, the Berserker's, the Wolves of the North Sea"?

With some exceptions, it is true to say that many of the Danish men I have come into contact with these past thirteen or so years, have borne very little resemblance to those warriors described in the `tales of old`. It's not that Danish men appear physically weak or in any way lesser men than anywhere else. In fact, Danish men, like all Scandinavian males, are generally taller, and more muscular than say Slavs, Scots, Welsh and Irish men for example. No, the difference was in their demeanour. My impression was then and still is that Danish men have been deliberately cowed down, and emasculated by a State Apparatus seeking absolute authority over every minute detail of a Danes life. There can be no arguing that here in Denmark, as it would seem with the rest of Scandinavia, the socially strategic `High ground` has been well and truly captured by the `Feminists` with the complicity of successive sitting governments.

Only a few days ago, I was speaking with a young Tunisian woman studying here as an exchange student, and she remarked to me that it appeared to her that it was the women who `ruled the roost` in Denmark, and she motioned with her hands depicting how one leads a Bull by the Nose. Exactly the same observations were made by another young woman staying here who comes from Moldavia. She is lodging with a Danish family locally and has been astounded at how dominant the wife is, and how compliant the husband is. It should be noted that the husband in question is physically very strong, intelligent and articulate, so why the subservience at home? Danish men have had their self confidence very badly bruised by incessant `pro femi` propaganda, which attacks them on all fronts simultaneously.

Having lived here for many years now, I must say that I can only concur with the comments made by the two young women mentioned above, and furthermore, this `Feminist` dominance, at least on the surface, is across the board and throughout all the public institutions. It seems to me that in order to actually get to deal with another man these days, one has to set one's sights very high up the Corporate or Municipal ladder.

So how were the progeny of `The Vikings` so reduced in stature? Scandinavia is the home of Social Democracy, which in reality is nothing more than `Cutural Marxism`. The whole social ethos of these Northern lands is Marxist to the bone. But there is more to this than first meets the eye. In fact, Danish society can appear to be something of a paradox, with it's flourishing consumerism (somewhat curtailed of late by the world economic downturn) and unashamed materialism on the one hand, neatly wed to a deeply embedded Marxist Socialist spirit on the other. Yet in reality, there is no paradox.. What do you get when a Socialist State gets in bed with Monopoly Capitalist Corporatism ? You get as Mussolini is once quoted as describing, `Corporatism` or rather ``Fascism`. That's right, I'm saying that Denmark is a Fascist State. A place whereby even the most minute details of a persons life are regulated and micromanaged by a vast State Bureaucracy. A Totalitarian Regime, elected by an deliberately uninformed populace.

Back in the 1960's, `equality of the sexes` was adopted as policy by the Social Democrats and placed on the school curriculum. At an early age, conventional ideas of male and female roles were broken down. Boys were taught to sew, girls to do woodwork. So called equality was taken to it's logical conclusion. There was no longer any reason why a father could not stay at home and care for the children whilst the mother went out to work. One of the purposes in predisposing women to work was clearly economic, but I suggest that this is only one `cog in the wheel`.

Men don't like being told what to do. Women are far easier to coerce and manipulate. The greatest obstruction to Totalitarianism is masculinity. The Danish State like all the other Dictatorships masquerading as democracies, hand in hand with Feminist ideologues, has conspired to emasculate the Danish male to the point where any prospect of some long lost `Viking` mentality rearing it's head in defiance, of the suffocating levels of control exercised by the State here would be unthinkable. Instead, as is the case in many other western lands, Danish men console themselves with Sports, DIY and other non idealogical, apolitical diversions, leaving such things very often to what arguably passes for the female here. These `hobbies` are the only outlet left for men to express their masculinity, and the Danes do so with gusto. The Danish National Football (Soccer for North American readers) consistently outperforms sides from much larger countries, and Danish Boxers, although not truly World Class, are to be found around and about every weight division of the various Boxing Authorities. It is similarly the case with other sports.

Gender Role confusion is rampant, particularly in young men and teenage boys. My own Step Son has confided in me many times that he just doesn't understand what girls expect of him. He tells me that they are impossibly argumentative, confrontational, show no respect for the masculine at all. He says that he would like to meet a nice girl and settle down, but he cannot imagine ever finding one.

Danish girls play football, chew gum, shout and behave badly in public, dress slovenly, have bad attitudes and are generally not a good advertisement for the feminine at all. I myself, as a former `Guest Lecturer` have been dumbfounded at the open bias towards girls and young women in the schools and universities here. If anyone reading this doubts my accuracy, please check out the website of any Danish School or University. The preponderance of young women featured in the photographs on these web pages defies any such argument to the contrary. When a young male student is depicted, it is usually some unfortunately effeminate `girly boy`, with his girly hair and girly clothes complete with those hideous girly shoulder bags.

The whole system here is set up to belittle and ridicule the masculine. How many nauseating times have I heard this phrase, " Macho man are really frightened little boys". How I hate that one, and challenge any `woman` to say that to my face.

In conclusion, what has been done to Danish men is in many ways what is being done to men all across the world, only here, the condition is extreme. Nothing about the masculine is celebrated. Everything about the `Feminist` (note, I said feminist, not feminine) is automatically taken as being the accepted `Truth` and symbolically carved in stone.

One last point, I was driving back from the local village a month or so ago when I saw some teen aged boys and girls playing football together. Not wishing to appear in any way strange, I parked up some distance away and watched, and saw that almost every time there was a disputed call, the referee (a non male) awarded the decision to the girls. Every time the boys scored, it was disallowed, every time a girl was tackled, she fell to the floor and was awarded a penalty. One could see the heads of the boys dropping, their enthusiasm and will to win being sucked from them, resigned to the hopelessness of their situation. What could they do, everything was against them. Of course, the girls won and jumped around , shouting and screaming, making fun of the opposing team. It was all rather sad, and in many ways, encapsulated what has become of the masculine in Danish Society.

Every now and then though, one gets a glimpse of what once was, when Danish men were the terror of all `Christendom`, like when recently, the excellent Danish Boxer Mikkail Kessler won the WBA Super Middleweight Belt. In the Danish man, there is a sleeping warrior, waiting for his time to come. The only problem is, that if he waits too much longer, the Aspartame, Fluoride, 21 vaccines per child, Tetra Waves and all the other insidious weapons being used against him and the rest of humanity by the New World Order will have dumbed him down to such a level, that resistance will be impossible.

So, `Sons of Thor` it's now or never. Take back what's yours by right of your ancestors blood and toil, and stop giving in. Turn off the TV, leave the DIY alone and open your eyes to what is being done to you and yours by a government who's only reason for being is to control you, and drip by sodden drip, take away all the fruits of your labour.

Philip Jones.  true_brit58@hotmail.co.uk

Response from Michelle:

First, I just wanted to say kudos to both you and Phillip Jones (excellent work as usual).  I came across this advertisement for the Rugby World Cup during my daily rounds on the web and I think this picture sums up everything you've been talking about.  The radical "feminist"social engineering program has penetrated every level of society and you straight men can't seem to catch a break! 
--

Hi Henry,
Remember the old Heinlein quote, "I've seen the future...and it doesn't work" ?

I've been reviewing the history of promoted gay/lesbian official trends over their last fifty years of activism.  The pattern to it is now clear.  For instance:
During the 60's, 70's and 80's, gays/lesbians/feminists endorsed denial of their mothers and fathers, blood relatives - calling for them to write off their straight families to join the gay 'family' as we saw parading in full deviant regalia in those gay parades. Women were told children were plot used by patriarchy to enslave them and hold them back.

They ridiculed monogamy, love and marriage as 'archaic vestiges of a patriarchal religion'.
With the help of wealthy old elite men's money, they had the media, entertainment industry, and public educational system at their disposal to promote the self indulgent, sex obsessed 'alternative lifestyles'.

Nobody wants to remember or speak of any of that, and out of thin air 'gay marriage' and homosexual right to adopt children or have sperm bank artificial insemination becomes the fashionable trend, and overrides the occupation of Iraq as most mentioned 'news', and somehow becomes the top 'issue' of the election year.

I'll take a stab at this:

What do Gays/Lesbians, and NGO's mean by 'family'?

When heterosexuals read or hear the word family, we think of mom, dad, brothers and sisters, Grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins.

To a lesbian feminist and gay activist attorney, or marketing specialist wordsmiths working on United Nations or NGO teams drafting 'soft law', "Family" doesn't refer to a heterosexual male and female union  sanctified by God in the presence of the blood kin and clan of the couple, and their subsequent offspring.  Break this down and you will see that the fundamental difference has to do with the blood kin relationship.

When lesbian/gay activists speak of 'family', what do they mean?  Certainly 'Father' is absent from the lesbian definition.  Generally 'family' for gays and lesbians refer to the 'gay and lesbian community', ie, an amalgam of individuals who's strongest relation to each other is a shared obsession with sexual relations with the same sex.  A 'family' can be two guys that met in a bar and decided to move in together because they like to have sex with each other and other such males.  There's nothing sacred in sex for it's own sake (ie, hedonistic thrills). Mating is a love bond which results in the co-creation of a human life.  I use the word co-creation specifically, since homosexuals and lesbians cannot co-create offspring. What do homesexuals and lesbians think about when they're engaged in sexually stimulating their same sex 'partner'?  Anything except creating a new human life. To say any homosexual has ever been lovingly visualizing the child of their 'union' is absurd, laughable.

It is the deep caring bond and commitment - love between sexual opposites who's natures compliment each other funadentally, and the aspect of creation of honored human life, which makes sex sacred, and only in that context.  What then can be the gay/lesbian motive for adoption of children?  What can be their motive for 'matrimony'? 

It isn't orgasm that's sacred, even if it's 'shared'. Orgasm is a fleeting physical reflex.
Yet there's been a torrent of promotion from 'new age' literature that orgasm is sacred. 
http://www.tantra.org/sacrorgs.html

New Age promoters dug up the theories of an ancient Hindu philosophy of 'sacred sex' called Tantra.  Now, Tantra isn't a common belief or practice in Hinduism at all, and the 'tantra' packaged for the west bears little resemblance to what ancient tantra was about.  New Agers extracted certain sexual rituals from the philosophy.  In theory these rituals involved coitus between a man and woman, not strangers but husband and wife, and tried to make a science of spiritual energy being passed from the man into the receptive female, who passed the energy back into her spouse in a cyclical circuit.  The idea was that the practitioners were supposed to be able through concentration to cause this energy to rise up from the base chakra up the spine through the heart chakra, and ultimately to the highest chakra. 
In formal hinduism tantric practice was forbidden between individuals of the same sex.  (sorry!).

New Age 'western' tantra emphasized orgasm as a  sacred experience, and promoted it to lesbians.  http://www.tantra.org/lesbian.html

"Lesbian love is sacred when it is visionary, interconnected and transformational. Through the power of love we come to know ourselves as both mothers/ creators of our lives and as daughters / caretakers of the earth. Our lives and our work can become expressions of this wisdom and power."

Mothers/ creators without the male principle. No 'Father'.. no sons.  Lesbian culture is based upon the Greek 'ideal' of the myth of the Amazons.  What exactly is the attitude of lesbian 'motherhood' towards children?  Here's the handbook:
("Lesbian Motherhood: Stories of Becoming")
http://familiesjoinedbylove.com/bookstore/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=14&products_id=62

What a joke. Feminists have been at the forefront of every movement and NGO promoting gratuitous abortions.  The infamous Chinese government's 'one child' policy was fronted by Maoist Chinese feminists. Feminists should consider these clues that they are being used to further a racist de-population agenda that has nothing to do with equality or civil rights.
But why did the planners of global de-population choose lesbians to raise up and empower to place on point to ramrod through genocidal policies which the public never would have condoned had they been presented at face value?  I'll leave that question to lesbian/feminists to answer to.

There's also an active children's book industry for the genre of fictional illustrated stories of Gay Dads and Lesbian Moms.

One of these gained national attention in the States when alarmed parents filed suit over a book, "My Two Dads" becoming  part of the first grade curriculum in Boston public schools.   The parents were ridiculed in the media, the book stayed.
http://familiesjoinedbylove.com/bookstore/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=16&zenid=dee1e5051ea1cb80a8d5e236f9ef9589

This is all nothing less than culture creation - the deliberate imposition of theoretical social paradigms for the supposed benefit of less than  5% or the population.  Homosexuals and lesbians have massive funding from foundations and politicians who serve a much larger business plan as a 'must be'. 

Before Kinsey, homosexuals and lesbians were a minuscule number of sexual deviants, and as William S. Burroughs himself said and showed in his novels, they well understood they were diviants.  Slaves to their own sexual self indulgence - and they couldn't break free.  The wholesome live of committed love to one person, respect for one's parents and grandparents and loyalty and love of one's blood kin were the furthest things from the thoughts and lives of either homosexuals or lesbians in 1947 and before. 

Not all homosexuals in America were as far gone as Burroughs, who was so obsessed with doing anything perverse that he lived entirely on the seamy, skid row side of town anywhere he went. (By preference - Burroughs wealthy family always paid his way and got him out of jams with the law, including his killing his wife in Mexico City).  We've all heard the laments of the 'closeted' homosexuals of the past - men who kept their sexual obsession secret, even taking wives merely as social cover.  When the media switched to raising deviants up as role models of an 'alternative, liberated lifestyle' during the 60's, we were supposed to relate to these men's self indulgent tales of how awful it had been only getting to indulge their obsessive vice by sneaking off to the seamy section of town.  Never mind these men had married women who loved them under false pretenses, fathered offspring just to use as cover for what they were.

During the big push of feminist/gay rights during the 60's and 70's, children were reviled as a nuisance that only trapped women into the 'slavery' of motherhood, holding her back from  'finding herself', even shackling her to a man for economic reasons.
Yes, we do get to remember and mention these platforms of feminism and gay activism and ask for explanations for these flip flops, conflicted goals.  It gives the impression that they've been making it up as they go along.

They haven't been making it up as they go along, though.  Tracing the history and promoted trends over the last fifty years of these 'movements' shows a logic of gradualization of breaking down heterosexual society. 

We're living through the brilliant results of fifty years of putting down the normal, healthy, sacred human instinct to love, mate, and commit to the cooperative relationship of the real family, community, and clan.  Gays and lesbians should be asked to consider why the latest trend and mandate coming down from the activist NGO's and within government now promotes their taking on the expense and responsibilities which twenty years ago they denounced as 'backward'.  Family is a lifelong commitment to offspring, marriage is a lifelong commitment to monogamy.  Can they handle it? 
Do they really want to?

You asked for some of the things I see as a cab driver day in and day out, well here are some of my observations. Never in the 45 years I have been alive (I have driven cabs as far back as 1986) have I seen people drink themselves to death as I do today. A 24 -year- old woman threw up on me just two weeks ago. I am also seeing more drunk women than ever before acting totally out of character. I have never seen woman show so much of their naked bodies, wearing miniskirts without underwear or bra (I see it in my cab every week).

I have never heard people use this amount of profanity in their language in all my years. I have never seen sodomy to this degree, I often get hit on by homosexuals who ask me first if I am married, and when I say no, some go even further and ask me if I am a homosexual which I respond with a flat Nope!! Some continue even after that with their sexual advances, one tried to touch me and I had to physically restrain him, another said how good I looked and how horny he was and that he had a room at the Hyatt if I wanted to hang out with him and a swinger couple.

I see an average of one murder event every month with police tape and the whole works. I see more prostitutes and pimps than ever before and of-course the drug dealers are allover selling crack and weed 24/7. Just yesterday a young 20-some-year-old asked me if I knew of a whore house that he could go to. Police are of-course everywhere, some good and others very crooked, harassing ordinary citizens like myself. Last Saturday night a cop told me that I can't park in the cab stand because it said no parking; I had to get out of the car and ask him to read the rest of the sign that said No Parking from 6pm to 4am Taxi Stand (the cop backed off).

I drive around in most neighborhoods with my doors locked and windows rolled up using A/C most of the time in the heat of summer. With gas prices at $4.00 + per gallon I pay 25% of my earnings into gas expense. I work from 6am to midnight average just to clear $50 to $75 per day after all expenses (gas, lease and food expenses). "It is the perfect slavery job", said one African driver. I have an MBA and have been in management and sales all my working years. In 2001 I got into the mortgage business until the bottom fell out of the real estate market courtesy of the Federal Reserve Banking Racket, and now I work slave hours at the perfect slave job in modern day Rome with all its pomp and glory.

In the movie comedy "The Guru", one Indian guy working at a Seven Eleven said to his new immigrant friend in the Indian accent "the only reason they call it the American Dream is because it only happens in your dreams", well the dream is over and this is the wake-up call by the Illuminati's who are now openly revealing their diabolical plans for humanity.

Henry you are so correct in calling this world the "fools paradise", unfortunately "Everbody plays the fool and there is no exception to the rule" as the song goes. We have all sinned and played the fool and the harlot and only Yahweh and His Son Yashuah can save us from ourselves and from each other.

I am sounding a negative message; however my outlook is very positive because I believe the scriptures when they tell me that this world order with soon change to a just and benevolent system whose Monarch will be the Messiah Himself.

I continue to enjoy your articles in exposing the Illuminati's/Church of Satan, I think most people are clueless about the magnitude of this wretched conspiracy and it will overtake them an ensnare them very soon. Already the conspiracy is producing the fruit of dysfunction,death and destruction in the lives of the majority and will continue to get worse. We must however remember the sun will rise after a stormy night and the Messiah/The Son will rise after this evil period of darkness.

Does RCMP Assistant Superintendent Darrell LaFosse think we're all stupid?

Apparently. On July 10, the Toronto Star released some alarming information from an RCMP internal memo where LaFosse falsely claims that the RCMP had no knowledge of the deaths of children in Indian residential schools until recently.

In reality, as early as December 13, 1995, the RCMP were notified of murders in the United Church's Alberni residential school, and these charges were reported in the Vancouver Sun that same month. (see asterisk, below) But twelve years later, the Mounties are pretending that it's all news to them.

Has LaFosse somehow forgotten that the Mounties ran a supposed "official investigation" into residential school crimes in B.C. from 1995 to 2001, through its "Indian Residential Schools Task Force"? And that this Task Force was provided and addressed the evidence of dead and missing children?

Suddenly, all of that history seems to have vanished.


According to the Toronto Star article, last December 24, 2007, Assistant RCMP Commissioner Darrell LaFosse wrote an internal briefing memo to Deputy Commissioner Tim Killam that said the RCMP "recently" learned of allegations about "missing children" and did not have detailed knowledge about the charges.


The memo, approved by LaFosse, says "some deaths" resulted from illness, but that "it is suspected by some Aboriginal people that there were deaths that may be criminal in nature ... While this perspective is gaining momentum among former students, it has only recently come to the attention of the RCMP as a result of discussions with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission."

Astounding. Is Superintendent LaFosse actually trying to make us believe that his own agency, which helped operate the residential schools and abducted native children from their villages, "only recently" learned about missing and dead children at these schools? Especially when the RCMP addressed these deaths in the media throughout 1995 to 1997?

Darrell LaFosse is lying. But that makes him a good candidate for participating in the government's fraudulent "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" (TRC), whose mandate prevents any public reference to misconduct in a residential school, or any naming of names of perpetrators.

In another internal memo to RCMP commanders, on February 20, 2008,  LaFosse confirmed that no criminal investigation into the schools will be conducted as a result of the TRC or the so-called "compensation" process.

In a new low, even for the RCMP, "Pinocchio" LaFosse continues to tell lies in the same memo by claiming there are "only sparse and vague accounts of events that would describe the RCMP's relationship with these schools. Most of the information comes in the form of verbal accounts from former students."

Not true. The RCMP were authorized by federal laws to act as the police arm of the residential schools, abducting children from their homes and hunting down runaways. This information comes from government records, not primarily from students' verbal accounts, as LaFosse claims.

LaFosse and has bosses must be nervous about all those dead native kids, to try re-writing history and subverting the truth in such a blatant manner. And so, naturally, they're covering all their bases by doing more than lying in public. LaFosse announced in the same memo the creation of an RCMP "steering committee ... to deal with issues arising out of the (TRC) hearings ... and to document the RCMP's own role in the era ... especially if investigations involve allegations of wrongdoing by RCMP veterans."

LaFosse should have checked the TRC mandate before rushing like that to produce his own spin on the RCMP's deep complicity in the deaths of residential school kids. For that mandate actually prohibits the government and church-selected TRC Commissioners from accepting any evidence or information regarding misconduct by an individual or organization in the schools!

LaFosse knows perfectly well that the role of his agency in crimes in the schools will be as officially whitewashed as that of the churches themselves; and yet the growing public outcry over the missing children, and the mounting evidence from survivors themselves, is forcing the RCMP to address the issue, and trip all over their own lies in the process.

That's all good. It's what happens to criminal bodies as their bloody past gets revealed. But the real question remains: when and how will a genuine, independent inquiry into the death and disappearance of residential school children be launched in Canada - and by whom?

July 11, 2008

* Note: RCMP officials were quoted in most of the following articles concerning the allegations of deaths and disappearances:

Murders Alleged at residential school by Stewart Bell, Vancouver Sun, December 13, 1995

Claim of Murder Goes back to '40's by Karen Gram, Vancouver Sun, December 18, 1995

Beaten to death for theft of a prune by Mark Hume, Vancouver Sun, December 20, 1995

Gatherers mark school's grim litany of death by Suzanne Fournier, The Province, June 4, 1996

Police told of death at residential school by Dirk Meissner, Victoria Times-
Colonist, September 24, 1997
---
Reach Kevin at------------ hiddenfromhistory@yahoo.ca