New JFK Book Provides Comic Relief

June 21, 2010

jfk+jackie.jpg
"My God I'm Hit! A Sherlock Holmes Approach To The Kennedy Incident On Elm Street"

by Brian David Andersen & Mark Samuel Anderson

Authors claim:

Assassination was faked. JFK lived out his years in Russia.

"Whereas so many JFK books fall short on presenting indisputable physical evidence, "My God, I'm Hit!" picks up the slack and delivers the solid facts and realities directly to the door-step of the reader's intellect and awareness. The tsunami of never-before-published factual information in "My God, I'm Hit!" raises the question: Will the reader's emotional state allow them to assimilate the blunt and stunning truths in our book or will their fear and judgment reject the once hidden but now obvious realities?"
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Verdict:

"I can endorse the book as an entertaining satire of Kennedy conspiracy theories.   Unfortunately, the book isn't supposed to be satire!"


Book Review by Richard Evans (for henrymakow.com)

The Kennedy Assassination remains the most investigated conspiracy of all time. The latest offering is "My God I'm Hit: A Sherlock Holmes Approach To The Kennedy Incident On Elm Street", by Brian David Andersen & Mark Samuel Anderson.

The book reads well initially, suggesting it contains new information. The authors present their case as if the reader is the jury. My interest was even piqued by the first implication that the authors would show that the famous Zabruder film was tampered with by Hollywood animation specialists.

"This book exposes the Zapruder film as a manipulated fraud, hoax and literal cover-up by citing five- point/multi-dimensional observations by key eyewitnesses and others on Elm Street."

Making note of that I read on, but the author's tease on the Zabruder film would have to wait as I found myself reading this:

 "The text and photos are primarily for persons born after 1977 because they are detached from the emotions, prejudices and brainwashing that their parents and grandparents experienced as the Kennedy saga unfolded and evolved."

This statement was the first red flag for me, because it's a circular argument.  We've seen this before.  "eye witness testimony isn't reliable because they're emotionally involved, so the the only credible witnesses weren't there".

No big deal.  I continued with interest to learn what new information the book could reveal regarding this tragedy.  Then from page 5 to 10 I realized the author wasn't kidding - he expects readers to believe the Kennedy Assassination was faked!  I had to re-read pages 5-10 to be sure I hadn't misunderstood. After dropping this bomb on page 5, the authors spend 4 more pages of empty rhetorical arguments;  "The question to ask is: Why does disagreeing with the premise of the "Kennedy Assassination" make people so incredulous or hostile?"

Why? It's one thing to say that 9-11 was a conspiracy,  and people can debate endlessly 'whodunnit'.  It's another to say the World Trade Center destruction itself was faked!  The same applies to the Kennedy Assassination.  The difference is motive.  Cui bono?  There's plenty of motives behind these two atrocities, but where's the motive for faking either of them? 

"My God I'm Hit" doesn't really provide any motive for the author's assertion that the 'Powers That Be' made President Kennedy "an offer he couldn't refuse:  abdication by fake assassination, or real assassination".

Cover-Web-Full.jpgINSULT

I was only ten pages into this thing and already feeling it was an insult to the reader's intelligence. But the second chapter "The Two Core Reasons" promised to explain why the bloody murder of the popular young President  would be 'faked'. 

Instead, the authors took me down a new rabbit hole.  This chapter begins with the affair between Jack Kennedy as while President and Mary Pinchot - the estranged wife of CIA big shot Cord Meyer.  These details are lifted from the 1984 autobiography of Dr. Timothy Leary - the LSD 'guru' of the 60's psychedelic movement.
 
"My God I'm Hit" twists this account to say that Mary Pinchot had President Kennedy "tripping" on LSD frequently, and that it was Leary providing her with the drug to do it.

The authors stampede ahead with conjectures such as, "Besides all his legal medications for his pain and suffering, JFK began "tripping" with Mary on LSD (declared illegal in 1966) provided by Leary. " "JFK's LSD trips totally revamped his approach to his sexuality and women and especially his relationship with Jackie."

So 'core reason one' that the Kennedy Assassination was faked (according to Andersen) is that LSD 'therapy' made Kennedy a workaholic.

"After beginning his therapeutic LSD sessions, JFK stayed in the White House while working 10 to 16 hour days. Because the therapeutic LSD sessions transformed his sexual attitudes, JFK funneled all of his physical, emotional and intellectual energies to creating legislation and Executive Orders that benefited the United States of America and not the Global Elitist agenda. The Powers-That-Be took notice of and exception to JFK's real, true and threatening "New Frontier." JFK's intentions shifted from the Global Elitist agenda of taking away the rights of common American citizens to supporting the rights and privileges of the common American citizens."

And if my mother had wheels she'd be a car.

LACK OF CREDIBLE MOTIVE

Fact is, the authors skirt around giving a credible scenario for why in the world Kennedy's death would be faked.  The second 'core reason' Andersen presents is Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 which initiated US Treasury issuance of Federal currency backed by US Treasury silver.  Andersen did that part right.

"Once the power was transferred, however routine that action may have seemed, a Treasury Department official appointed by Kennedy named James J. Saxon put Executive Order 11110 into dynamic action. What Flaherty, Griffin, Zarlinga, Wikipedia and others craftily do not address is immediately after this power was transferred to the Treasury Department, over four billion dollars worth of $2 and $5 United States notes were circulated throughout the world."

Yes indeed. Those bills were called 'silver certificates', and were blue-green. As a kid we knew to collect them for one of the first things Johnson did as President was stop Treasury from printing any more of them.

Never-the-less 'core reason two' for faking Kennedy's murder is simply just another reason for killing him.  Andersen gives "More Reasons" at the end of the book in Appendix I.   I could see why he reserved them for the end -- I think he figured only those dumb enough to read the whole book might believe them!   One reason he supposes casts a prominent American Catholic Cardinal of the early 60's as the 'Black Pope' - and of course the Black Pope in Andersen's theory is the top head of the 'Powers That Be'.  

Before reaching that brilliant conclusion Andersen puts the reader through nearly 400 pages of fantastic assertions.  He spends a whole chapter explaining that the President was specially fitted up with a concealed "pyrotechnic device" rigged to explode fake blood and brain debris.  This device was to be triggered by Jackie Kennedy, who would then put on "the acting job of her life" pretending to be traumatized by having her husband's brains splashed all over her.  Which of course was all 'fake' *wink* *wink* *nudge* *nudge*
.  
If this doesn't insult the reader's intelligence enough to toss it in the nearest trash can, Andersen proceeds to detail a hidden panel in the back of the limo to the roomy trunk, in which JFK's 'body double' is concealed, ready for the REAL Kennedy to be switched with the dead body of the double.

To complicate matters the REAL JFK has actually been shot in the shoulder just to make it look good.

I'll fast forward past the parts about the FAKE Oswald and FAKE Jack Ruby who have doubles who also are killed.

Where does Kennedy go?  He's secretly transported to a luxury compound on the Baltic coast courtesy of the Soviet Union to live out his days with his alleged mistress - a famous socialite whom Andersen says faked her own death in 1965.  According to Andersen, JFK had a terminal disease and didn't have long to live anyway.   He spent out his final days swimming and playing tennis in a wheelchair, and presumably tripping on LSD.

bubba_hotep_1.jpg("Bubba Hotep" left)

CONCLUSION

You'd have to be on LSD to believe this book. Every few years some new Kennedy Assassination disinformation hype comes out to add confusion to the evidence so that new generations won't even know what a serious atrocity was done to the people of the United States.  So I get a bit angry when somebody is in that business.

I can endorse the book as an entertaining satire of Kennedy conspiracy theories.   Unfortunately, the book isn't supposed to be satire!  This outlandish premise reminds me of a cult classic movie "Bubba Hotep," which did satirize American quasi-reality mythologies by portraying elderly Elvis Presley and John F. Kennedy incognito living out their lives in a shabby nursing home somewhere in the South USA.

"The film version also stars Ossie Davis as Jack, a black man who claims to be John F. Kennedy (explaining that he was patched up after the assassination in Dallas, dyed black, and abandoned by Lyndon Johnson). "

Given a choice between reading "My God I'm Hit" and watching Bubba Hotep on DVD, I have to go with Elvis. Bubba Hoptep is closer to reality.



Comments for "New JFK Book Provides Comic Relief"

Author Reply said (June 24, 2010):

Reply from co-author Mark Anderson

Richard Evans’ book review was written by someone who skimmed rather than read the book, My God, I’m Hit, that I edited and co-authored. Not to mention the reviewer’s shaky reasoning. He noted the following passage from the book:

"The text and photos are primarily for persons born after 1977 because they are detached from the emotions, prejudices and brainwashing that their parents and grandparents experienced as the Kennedy saga unfolded and evolved."

And then Evans said this:

This statement was the first red flag for me, because it's a circular argument. We've seen this before. "eye witness testimony isn't reliable because they're emotionally involved, so the only credible witnesses weren't there."

Actually, that statement by Evans was my first red flag, indicating he misunderstands to a degree what he read and that he hadn’t completely read the book.

We meant that people born later are more detached from the event and therefore are more open to new information of whatever kind about this event. People who were young adults or a little older when the Elm Street event occurred are naturally more prone to believe the official story. Only a tiny fraction of people were in Dallas to actually witness the event. It’s not a circular argument at all. Someone born later without any presuppositions is not as propagandized. Is that really so hard to understand?

The posted comment by the reader “molecule” at this website is indeed interesting. He would have no reason to lie about such a thing, and his recollection of Nelson Rockefeller and the boys boozing and yapping about the Kennedy assassination being staged sounds completely plausible.

The fact is that back in 1963 it would have been quite easy to fake a fatal shooting, amongst a population that had not yet used cell phones with cameras, mini-camcorders and handy digital cameras. There were but a handful of easily controlled media outlets. Our book outlines a host of things that bring to light the manner in which the “Elm Street shuffle” was apparently done. Generally speaking, think about the following:

If you were the powers that be, you would create the magic bullet theory, complete with the nearly pristine bullet itself, to concoct a false scenario. You would then doctor the Z-film so you could say, “See JFK reach for his throat. This magic bullet, that just happened to turned up later, is the bullet that hit JFK in the back of the neck or high upper back and came out where his tie was tied. That is why he reached for his throat. The bullet zig-zagged around en route as it entered Gov Connally. We know that is not physically possible, but we are the elite and you will believe it. If we say you saw a unicorn, then you did.”

But the best-placed witnesses we cite all indicated that no such body motions by JFK took place. And, I am sorry Mr. Evans, but you cannot assign equal merit to each and every witness, so we cited the closest ones who were best-placed – which demolishes the argument that we consider eyewitnesses inherently unreliable.

Now, stay with me. This gets interesting.

To pull this off, two key things had to happen.

You had to get the highly efficient ambulance crew of Al Rike out of that sector of Dallas that they routinely covered. That is why no ambulance was involved as should have been the case. The stage managers would tolerate no interlopers.

And, having invented the magic bullet that would comport with the film script, you then would doctor JFK’s jacket to cover up the one and only nonfatal shoulder wound, and then fake the bullet hole that supports the Z-film and magic bullet. (Gerald Ford was known to have moved the entry wound’s location around on different spots of the jacket when he considered this subject during, and I believe after, the Warren Inquisition on which he served.)

Notably, the mere fact that the Presidential Limo sped away, acting as the ambulance, is odd when looked at objectively, as is the observation that JFK’s Secret Service man, Roy Kellerman, enjoyed a leisurely limo ride in a “stand down” position. He was nowhere near being in position to jump on and cover JFK when the shots were fired. And no Secret Service men stood on the back of the Presidential Limo; they instead enjoyed a leisurely ride on the car behind the Limo. No prying eyes allowed.

Anyway, the noted epileptic-seizure guy, on cue, had his seizure and Rike’s ambulance picked him up in Dealey Plaza and sped away just a few minutes before the JFK motorcade came.

So, the quick version is the fake bullet and fake film creates a false reality. Real rifle shot hits JFK once in shoulder, nonfatal. Other shots are diversionary, as are the “tramps on the train,” and other “stage extras” who were only there to confuse and confound. Explosive device is used to simulate fatal head wound. Limo speeds away. Ambulance help is gone. A switch occurs in the Limo (read the book) and a little later the Secret Service is mean and hell-bent to get “JFK” out of Parkland and not allow a local autopsy and closer body inspection.

We’re told “assassination” so we will forever argue on that premise and never solve the case. It may sound like a stretch, of course, but in this case you “have to believe it to see it,” in many respects. You’re dealing with a sophisticated through-the-looking-glass operation and you have to deduce what happened from an abstract angle.

We, Brian and I, really feel this is what happened. The book explains the network utilized to pull it off, as best as we could discern given the circumstances nearly 50 years later.


Jim said (June 22, 2010):

The Zapruder film no doubt was doctored. They claim the driver shot him, but I doubt it. He had to drive the car. Not many know that Jackie was Jewish. I believe he was shot from the storm drain. There may have been a shooter on the grassy knoll, but the storm drain would make more sense. The other shooters were in place to cover this guy. The limo driver was told to slow down when he saw someone pump and umbrella. Each person had something they had to do, but they didn't know each other. I've looked at the film. It doesn't appear Jackie did anything.

But they guess as to who shot him? The mafia didn't like him, but they don't even like to kill Cops, because of the heat. LBJ wanted Kennedy out of the way and he knew what was up. But Kennedy was going to put money into circulation and bypass the Jewish bankers and this was why he was shot. Kennedy made enemies with the CIA talking about eliminating that agency. LBJ and George Bush all were in on it. But Mossad killed the guy.

I think they did it like they did to show others what they can do. The the secret service guy in the car behind JFK told the secret service guy to get off the rear of the car, because he would be in the way of a shot from the building. Plus he would have been very close and might have seen something.

So we know the limo driver slowed down at the place where he saw the guy pump the umbrella. We know the limo driver turned around to see. We know the other shooters were in place to frame Oswald. We know Kennedy had made many enemies. So this means nobody would want to get to the truth and they would cover up the crime.

These presidents talk about bypassing International bankers could issue money from our own government, but it would be wise they do this from the safety of The White House. They should only have secret service people around they know they can trust. Since LBJ took office no presidents have done anything to piss off the Jews. Nixon didn't like them and this is why they erased some of the parts on his tapes. They wanted us to hear some things, but not all. What they erased is where he was saying things about the Jews that they would just assume the American public didn't hear. So they claim the parts were erased three times, but they can still hear something being said. They claim they'll have the technology to know what was said on the tapes. That will probably be about the same time the FBI opens the records they have on Martin Luther King. By then it won't matter.

Most Americans have a good idea of who did it. The Mossad is not going to admit to it.


Deb said (June 22, 2010):

There is one positive comment I'd like to make on this piece of fluff book, and that is that the authors seem to see what I do in the Zapruder film: that Jackie did do "something" to John Kennedy at the point of impact to his head, either faked or real. I'm currently working on a novel, just for my own enjoyment mind you, based on the premise that Jacqueline Kennedy, due to threats to her children by the PTB (aka Zionist Jewish Mafia/Mossad Israeli Gov't), did fire a head shot to her husband in the limo at nearly the same instant a shot rang in from the grassy knoll by Officer J. D. Tippit (aka "Badgeman"), who's later-murdered body served as a body double for the autopsy photos in order to control where the desired gunshot wounds would be located. My offering's working title is: "Jackie In the Confessional: 'I Shot Jack!'" To all skeptics, I say: Watch the Z film in slo mo and keep your eyes on Jackie instead of just on the victim!


Matt said (June 22, 2010):

pparently, an ardent Zionist named Louis Mortimer Bloomfield was a
key figure behind the JFK hit.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKbloomfield.htm

I believe "Nomenclature of an Assassination Cabal" by William Torbitt
is invaluable for anyone wanting information about the entities behind
the incident. This is the most revealing article I have ever come
across regarding the JFK hit.

http://scribblguy.50megs.com/torbitt.htm


Molecule said (June 22, 2010):

My uncle (now deceased) was a member of the LI chapter of the SAR (Sons of the American Revolution). His club of alcoholic has-beens used to get together every month at his farm on Eastern LI once a month, where they would hang out and get drunk. Occasionally Nelson Rockefeller would show up in blue jeans. One time, after they had been blue fishing in the race at Plum Gut (off Orient Point), they were all sloshed and crooning about their catch, they explained to me (I was only 14 at the time) that the JFK assassination was entirely a staged event.

Barely coherent, they explained that JFK had found out he had a terminal disease (Addisons?) that would have disabled him while in office, so HE decided to stage his own assassination. JFK was in on it every step of the way.

That theory was kind of supported by a video which William Cooper (Behold a Pale Horse) sold, which showed that the "assassination" was clearly a high noon ceremony per Free Masonic rituals. The execution was timed to within minutes of exact local noon (Sun at perfect due south), and it occurred at the southern-most tip of a five pointed star (Dealy Plaza being a point on a pentagram street design or something). I never saw the video, but I remember Wm Cooper describing more about this Masonic ceremony on his shortwave show, The Hour of the Time (?). Wm Cooper was killed on his place in Arizona. The video is probably available somewhere.

I don't know about JFK doing LSD with Mary Pinchot -- that sounds like total FUD to me. I don't believe Kennedy was the clueless reckless party boy, nor Mary Pinchot the sex crazed milf that the zionist mafia wants us to believe they were. Timothy Leary was working with the right-wing MKUltra crowd, trying to perfect the art of making sex zombies out of children, for extortion, assassination, etc.

That same MK-Ultra crowd included Cord Meyer, who Pinchot divorced. She was a high minded artist. I do think however that Pinchot's notebook, wherein she recorded notes from her secret meetings with JFK, was a hot item. Pinchot and JFK shared the same personal enemy - namely Cord Meyer, the MK-Ultra crowd, and the Illuminati. So there may have been real friendship there, instead of endless LSD and hallucination sex. (Total FUD!)

Within minutes of her assassination on the toe path on the B&O Canal (an odd place for someone of her economic status to go jogging IMHO), James Jesus Angleton and Ben Bradley (?) broke into her house, ransacked it until they found her notebook, whereupon they quickly disappeared into the night.

Supposedly, Angleton, who got there first, gave it to his buddy, Cord Meyer, who, like Trotsky, supposedly died in Mexico City. Meyer, Angleton, Bradley, and the rest of the et al of the CIA and Pentagon were (ARE) all agenturas of the Illuminati. Castro, also on the CIA payroll, was trained by the Pentagon (Col. Henry Morgan, US Army Special Forces) on a unique piece of CIA-connected property near Mexico City, that is 60 sq. miles in area and has guard towers on the property corners. E. Howard Hunt was CIA station chief in Mexico City when Castro got his terrorism training there.

I also remember my uncle explaining that I need not worry about Strontium-90 getting in farm grass and then in dairy milk. (That was supposedly the big scare about nuclear war.) He said that when we were attacked, the attack would begin with PsyOps takeouts of our national symbols, starting with the Empire State Building and the Pentagon as the symbols of our financial and military strength.

The idea was that loss of these symbols of our strength would so break us psychologically, we surrender. (... his idea, not mine). The WTC hadn't been built at that time, so the Empire State building would have been the big PysOps target of the time. The events of 911 were in effect fully described to me in 1962, by a different uncle but from the same crowd ... while fishing for blues in Plum Gut, again.

--

Thanks Molecule,

If JFK was an enemy of the Illuminati, why would he assist in their phony assassination? Again, where is the motive, disease or no disease?

h


David said (June 22, 2010):

One needs to look no further than executive order 11110 ( i believe ) to find out who assassinated Kennedy. The fact that people are starting to join the dots on this issue explains the timely release of this non-sense.

True there were many groups motivated but only one group stood to lose billions upon billions of dollars. You can be assured they are the ones who kept people swimming in a sea of "conspiracy theories " for years. You are an intelligent person i have read your work for years.........so i say this with the utmost of respect one needs to look no further than the owners of the federal reserve to find out who enabled the assassination.


Steve (general comment) said (June 22, 2010):

Hi Henry

I was at a local club here in Australia NSW and used the courtesy internet laptop while waiting for a friend

I surfed a few sites and then tried yours only to be amazed that an instruction page came up saying:
"You have tried to access a web page which is in violation of your internet usage policy
URL: www.henrymakow.com
Category: Racism and Hate "
Further:
"To have web page re-evaluated click: url.fortinet.net/rate/submit.php?id ...."

This was on a government provided "Broadband for Seniors" i.e., {Australian Government}

The filtering system used was Forti Guard Web Filtering real time network protection.

Henry I will leave this with you as this filtering system is only on an Australia wide free seniors internet provided by the Aust. Gov

Unfortunately it is the thin end of the wedge for free speech - as I see it.
--

Thanks Steve

If I ever needed proof that I am right, this is it.

henry

---

From Robert:

I believe that there must be a deliberate policy not to encourage seniors in our society from becoming familiar with the Internet. Many of them are withering away in boredom, not aware of the world of information and experience now accessible to practically everybody, yet little is being done to connect them to it. Why would this be a policy? Because most seniors have lots of time on their hands and, being out of the career racket with its chilling effect on candour, nothing to lose from expressing their real views. Thus, they constitute a huge potential problem for the ruling elites. This is undoubtedly why the Australian government is censoring the information available to them in that country.

In contrast, in China a large proportion of seniors use the Internet regularly for communication, but of course there the censorship is global (although not of many western anti-establishment sites; e.g., I'll bet one could readily access savethemales.ca) and in any case there is no tradition of freedom of speech about politics.


Hilf said (June 22, 2010):

On a similar note to the JFK assassination, I feel certain that Saddam Hussain was never "captured" in that humiliating fashion {from a hole in the ground] nor executed. Had the US actually killed him, then the incentive to act as faithful puppets would have been removed from the other leaders in the region. Very little was said in the media on this subject and I for one am very sceptical. Much has been written about JFK but I doubt anything revealed at this stage would actually make any difference. It becomes old news and no one is interested. In a few years' time we will no doubt have the "truth" revealed about 9 11 in an amazing tell-all publication! People will shake their heads and say that it was in the past, the work of a former government and things are "different" now!


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at