Lula & Dilma: Marxist Criminals Rape Brazil
September 24, 2010
-Press Exposes Rampant Graft-Lula Tries to Censor Media
(Lula, in his union days)
What people don't understand is that Marxist parties don't want to play the democratic game. The want power, and once power is achieved, they will never leave the throne. Their goal is total control of society.
by Marcos
(San Paolo Corespondent
henrymakow.com)
It is possible that since Hitler's burning of books in the public square, the world has not seen such a surreal situation: a protest inside the Journalists' Union FOR the censorship of the press.
Yes, you read it right. Lula's Workers party and some of their lapdog organizations are defending what they call "social control" of the media. Social control for them, is the creation of Soviets, comprised in their entirety of Communist groups, which would decide what to publish.
Erenice's son created a bogus company to lobby and charges 6% for contracts that were approved with the help of his mother influence. We are talking about deals of R$ 9 BILLION (US$ 5 Bi).
Further investigation showed that many members of Erenice family were hired by the government to do nothing or were involved in other scandals. It is unbelievable, but Erenice will be followed in the Chief of Staff position by another woman who was involved in a huge scandal when her husband was a mayor and took bribes from bus companies. Later, he denounced the scheme and was found dead. The family says he was murdered by the Party. Nothing has been proved.
Lula, cynically said that his son is a genius, like a Ronaldinho (from soccer). The corruption news came on top of another scandal, where Party militants were digging into fiscal data from the adversaries.
The goal is to destabilize a state that is not yet in their control and where they will lose big time. They hate the fact that Sao Paulo has drastically reduced crime and that people here just don't buy the populist lies of Lula. They have done this many other times, especially using the Teacher's Union, coming to a point of seriously hurting a governor who was suffering from terminal cancer and stopping classes for the children for months on end.
Now, he says he was the one who created it. Lula is portrayed in the international press as a humble worker who made it. This couldn't be further to the truth. In fact, he worked in the plant for a couple of years. After that, he became an union leader and never worked again. Dilma follows his footsteps. She has also never worked in the private sector, and was always held a sinecure created for her by a leftist politician. Her only real work experience has been as a little shop owner, which went bankrupt in one year. This is the next President of Brazil.
In fact, they have destroyed Brazil's education system, and illiteracy is higher than when Lula took power. The ranking of Brazilian students in the world has dropped. Basic sanitation (sewerage) is in the same level. Health service is a disaster. 50,000 Brazilians die violent deaths, most because of drugs and guns that are brought into Brazil by the Colombian terrorist organization FARC, a friend and ally of the Party for decades.
Comments for "Lula & Dilma: Marxist Criminals Rape Brazil "
Charles said (September 25, 2010):
The article was interesting but I saw nothing to indicate that Brazilian politics had significantly changed other than it was still corrupt. Military dictatorships by the way are not paragons of virtue and sound economies.
Putting Lula in his Marxist context is excellent: Marxist ideology in a continent dominated by the American backed military governments has a chance of viability as it rings true no matter how counterfeit. Class struggle is
perfectly obvious to people who recall that anti-communism permitted Nazi atrocities and who no doubt think there is a difference in communisms and that one with a Latin face is different than one with a Slavic face.
Obviously a political tradition of "normalism" is difficult to root in such an extreme situation.
Jesper said (September 25, 2010):
It´s true you hear all sorts of stories for and against the Lula/PT regime. You will see statistics published which claim that, thanks to Lula, Brazil has no foreign debt any longer (hard to believe if you understand how the international banking system works) and you will see equally well supported claims that the country´s debt, internal and external, has doubled or tripled. It is also true that politicians from all parties and ideologies, not just the Left, participate in the same well-organized scams and frauds. It is also true we are nearing an election and everyone is looking for shit to throw into the fan. But the shit that´s now flying around is not imaginary. It is very real, and it is just the tip of a putrid iceberg.
The information provided by Marcos, notwithstanding the hostile tone it is delivered in, is essentially correct. Now, what is most disquieting about the situation is not the mega-thefts and collusions revealed these days (we should be used to that sort of thing by now), but the prospect of having a Brazilian Leftist totalitarian regime networked across Latin America. I don´t think I need to elaborate on the difference between socialist dictatorships and "right-wing" banana republics.
And yes, I have in fact checked on Lula´s and Dilma´s background. I´d say I have quite a lot of material about the political, intellectual and cultural revolution in Brazil, gathered over the last 20 years, that I would be delighted to share with you, if you don´t mind reading in Portuguese.
Marcos said (September 25, 2010):
Otto, the commenter in your site is an example of the paid web sturmtroopers of the Party. They flood newspaper comments sections and create blogs. Their leader is Marcelo Branco, former free software apologist turned Party puppet.
Journalists are also rewarded for defending the Party in the web. Luiz Nassif got a US$ 100K monthly contract to be a " commentator" on a state TV.
The guy has the nerve to say Dilma was never a communist...please!
I bet they will soon flood your site with lies.
Otto said (September 25, 2010):
The arcticle about Lula and Dilma is totally biased; Brazil never before enjoyed so much democracy and press freedom. The desperation of the supposed "opposition" is flagrant and the insults are many. Lula and Dilma never were communists, please see their life background.
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at






Luis said (October 19, 2010):
Before make your comments on the page where you describe Ms. Dilma Hussef as being a terrorist, you must follow more carefully Brasilian political history, otherwise you became also a terrorist.
In a briefly explanation, looking to the past, Dilma was one of the patriots that fight agaist military dictatorship on 1960 up to 1988th, whem our country had a terrible killings and kidnappings in name of anti-comunism system.
At that time thousands of brasilians have brutally tortured and died without human rights, perhaps worse than what hapenned on Bosnia.
Civil rights were ignored.
She was a hero instead.
Now many people that could be judged by the military crimes have afraid of her election, so as who financed the military revolution obviously do not want her president, among these sponsors appeared FMI, Bankers and USA.
There was, then, initiated a smear campaign on a global scale that now you also a part.
But most of people are for her.
Exactly as happened in many countries today we also have our identity and we will not accept external influence on our destinies and our evolution