Direct Link to Latest News


July 22, 2010

"Second Oil Spill Confirmed -Smaller than the First (which was the largest in history.)"

(From Ken Price)

Dear Henry,

Here is an interesting tv news broadcast from July 21st that reveals a second deep water oil well, called the "Ocean Saratoga," has been leaking since April.  What I find most interesting is that this information was just released by the coast guard.  In the report,they state that the size of the spill is SMALLER than that of the Deepwater Horizon's, but that it is now visible as a slick on the ocean that is miles long.  

Can you believe the rhetoric!  Smaller than the Deepwater Horizon's?   So, it could have been as large as the aforementioned oil volcano, or, it was so small that the US Coast Guard didn't even need to mention it, or something in-between.  Thanks for presenting a potential second disaster as though it is nothing!

It is amazing what kind of confounding/worthless information these supposed professional newscasters are getting away with.  "Hey it's just another accident in the already accident-prone Gulf of Mexico."

Is it possible that there is a tie-in with the Mathew Simmons story about the original and uncontrollable Deepwater well being ignored with this now recent report of a confirmed second leak?  Why?  For confusion purposes.

Go here for a map of the total number and location of oil rigs currently in the Gulf region.  There are 3,858 platforms.

Go here for a hurricane forecast.  The forecast is for gale force winds to be in the vicinity of the cleanup efforts five days from now.

With these conditions and changing events noted, one thing I think we know is this:  

In the aftermath of the next hurricane striking the gulf region (which could be soon), Government data vs. BP data vs. TV media data vs. Internet data won't matter, as it will be impossible to sort out the real truth in the midst of forced evacuations and media cowardice.

From June:

Did you see this video on youtube, by any chance? It states the entire gulf oil leak was created and is controlled by the NWO for depopulation:

My husband and I watched it and we must admit, it does make us wonder if this entire gulf oil leak was indeed purposed and created by the NWO to cause a phony disaster in order to enable them to depopulate (use bio weapons (dispersant) and kill off low income coastal populations) and gain control of all waterfront properties! I do know that much of those waterfront areas are populated by low income and black people.

The video does not give the name of the person who says he or she received this info firsthand from the top levels of government, so it lacks credible witness, but it does provide for an extremely credible possibility that what this person is saying is true. After listening to it, we do wonder why there is not more oil, not tar balls, but oil, coming up on the beaches.

This should be more evident. Could this 'illusion' be the reason the government is breaking the first amendment and keeping the media from knowing too much? Could they have played the 'illuminati card' for real, drilled into the volcano side to create a  'controlled' oil leak, and tell the world it was a real accident--now playing the world into thinking this is a huge out of control disaster...thus giving them an easy way to commit mass murder?

This video by a person shows that the oil in the gulf can be cleaned within 6 weeks by the use of natural microbes that live in the ocean:

This is how the oil during the 1979 gulf oil leak disappeared and got cleaned. So, the NWO was not concerned about allowing oil into the gulf back in April, as they know the microbes would dissipate it eventually, like the1979 scenario.

I saw a news video ( showing that gulf disaster back in 1979, and this gulf oil leak seems to be an exact copycat, except this leak is in a deeper area of the ocean. Back then, they performed all the exact same procedures that they are doing now, and in the end nothing worked until they drilled  'relief' wells. This was 4 months after the spill, and thus they were finally able to cap that well.
Could it be that they staged that oil leak back in 1979, and now, repeating the process again to further their global agenda? Or could it be that they used the 1979 oil disaster as a blueprint to create a 'staged' oil leak in 2010?

What does concern me is that many news sites are using this Simmons fellas' (oil expert from the Bush era) interview...yet he is CFR, right? So, can he be trusted? Or is he a plant to make this illusion look real?
I am sure we will all know more later as time passes, but the above first video is compelling information to consider...what do you think?

The facts remains...highly toxic dispersants were used and is now raining down on the gulf populations...and soon humans will get sick and die just like some plants and trees are currently doing.  (Dispersants were used in 1979, by the way). It is unbelievable, simply unbelievable, that they can get away with using such a toxic dispersant...yet, here they are, legally killing people all under the guise of stopping the oil....what genius by these madmen!

Ken Price comments on Second Video

I think everyone should watch this video.

I haven't had much time to research asphalt volcanoes, but I intend to.

I think this video is extremely valuable in that it gives us a different direction to look and think.  I believe that depopulation of the Gulf Region and a redevelopment toward a modern Riviera is very believable as it fits in line with what we saw from Hurricane Katrina.

It explains why not one world leader has threatened the United States with retaliation for not stopping what appears to be a breach in the world's food chain.

This young man is very courageous.  He gives us the background of the police state that is in existence as we speak and yet his main message is to not worry about the world's oceans.  He is a man I want to believe.

I almost weep to think what life would be like if we allowed people like him to be our real leaders.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at