Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |
 

How the Illuminati is Reordering the Middle East

October 23, 2012

HowtomanipulatethePeople.jpg



In March 2007, retired General Wesley Clark told Amy Goodman
that the Pentagon already had plans as early as
September 2001 to take down seven Islamic countries, Iraq, 
Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.













by Richard Evans 
(henrymakow.com) 

In 1997, a group of Republicans formed a non-profit organization called the Project For A New American Century (PNAC). In their first white paper, Rebuilding America's Defenses, they proposed taking down Saddam Hussein, Iraq and then reordering the entire Middle East. Parenthetically, they admitted that selling such plans to the American people would take a long time, "absent some catastrophic catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor." (p.51) 

September 11, 2001 was obviously just what they had in mind. 

In 2000, the US Supreme Court selected another Bush as the 43rd US President and he waited until 9/11 to begin reordering the world. 


clark.jpeg
In that connection, in March 2007, retired General Wesley Clark told Amy Goodman on her Democracy Now TV program that as early as September 2001, the Pentagon already had plans to take down seven Islamic countries, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. If you have not seen the short You Tube of General Clark's revelations on Democracy Now, it is worth watching 

At that time, I was skeptical about such a large US Military operation, because we all knew The Bush Administration lied us into Iraq with phony stories of Weapons of Mass Destruction, yellowcake uranium, mobile biological weapons labs, etc. 

In 2007, the US Military only occupied Afghanistan and Iraq, so I asked myself, "How will The White House justify the military cost to the American people of invading Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran?" 

By 2011, the answer became clear. The unnecessary wars against Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia and Sudan would be staged covertly as irregular military coups with the US Military and CIA supporting PHONY democracy movements.

Remember the baloney about 'Arab Spring' and the spontaneous 'Twitter' revolutions supporting "civil unrest" in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya? 

Was the USA behind these civil wars and bogus democracy movements? OF COURSE! 

Remember 2011 when Libyan Al-Qaeda could not budge Gaddafi's Libyan Army, the US and NATO enforced a NO Fly Zone over Libya and launched hundreds of cruise missiles in support of Al-Qaeda and the rebels. 

By Oct 20, 2011 Muammar Gaddafi was a deadman and Libya was a war torn shattered nation. But no one in America feels the least bit guilty about America's role in trashing Libya. Most people believe these events were spontaneous democratic revolutions. Doesn't anyone remember the PNAC's plans to reorder the Middle East?

GR.jpeg
GADDAFI RESISTANCE KILLED US AMBASSADOR 

In Libya last month, we lost Ambassador Steven in an attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi. The press wants us to think that we brought "freedom and democracy" to Libya, not chaos and death. They want us to believe that there is no Green Resistance to the NATO or its Al-Qaeda allies in Benghazi, but everyone in Libya knows about the Green Resistance, whose members are called "Tahloob" (Arabic for "Gaddafi loyalists"). 

In reality, the Green Resistance destroyed the US Consulate in Benghazi September 11, 2012. They have been increasingly active since shortly after the murder of Muammar Gaddafi in October 2011. They strike any NATO target they can, and they execute key Libyans who betrayed Gaddafi and sided with NATO. The Benghazi incident was merely their latest blow against what they see as NATO's illegal occupation of their country. Ignoring the Tahloob only happens outside of Libya, by the NATO powers and their subservient media. 

In Egypt, President Mohamed Morsi of the radical Muslim Brotherhood replaced moderate Hosni Mubarak, yet the civil unrest in Egypt continues.  While Obama and Romney trade accusations about whether The Obama Administration was guilty of leaving the grounds of the Benghazi Consulate vulnerable, THERE IS NO SERIOUS DISCUSSION REGARDING WHETHER THE US MILITARY SHOULD SUPPORT THESE PHONY REVOLUTIONS IN THE FIRST PLACE. 

WAGING WAR WITHOUT PERMISSION

What is even more disturbing is the US Congress is side-stepping its US Constitutional duty to declare war, but the press ignores their failure too. The CIA shouldn't decide whether we go to war. The US Congress should debate and decide, so Congressmen can be responsible to the American people come election time.

There is a Constitutional debate in America regarding whether Obama is in violation of the War Power Act in regard to Libya, BUT THE MEDIA IGNORES THIS VIOLATION. 

"May 20, 2011, marked the 60th day of US combat in Libya (as part of the UN resolution) but the deadline arrived without President Obama seeking specific authorization from the US Congress. President Obama, however, notified Congress that no authorization was needed, since the US leadership was transferred to NATO, and since US involvement is somewhat limited. On Friday, June 3, 2011, the US House of Representatives voted to rebuke President Obama for maintaining an American presence in the NATO operations in Libya, which they considered a violation of the War Powers Resolution." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution

So how is this reordering of the Middle East progressing? Friday, October 19, 2012, a huge car bomb in a Christian Beirut neighborhood killed Lebanon's security chief, General Wissam al-Hassan along with seven others and wounding eighty or more people. 

CARBOMB.jpeg
Two days after that, a similar car bomb ripped through the Christian Old Town of Damascus. Two days later, Tuesday, October 23, three car bombs in Baghdad killed nine people and wounded 26.

If anyone seriously wonders WHO WOULD DO SUCH AWEFUL THINGS? -- they should recall the PNAC's plans and Wesley Clark's revelations to Amy Goodman.









Power for patriots

Comments for "How the Illuminati is Reordering the Middle East"

Krister said (October 25, 2012):

Firstly General Wesley Clark, quoted in the article might not be the best peace-angel:

"I'm not going to start the third world war for you," General Sir Mike Jackson, commander of the international KFOR peacekeeping force, is reported to have told Gen. Clark when he refused to accept an order to send assault troops to prevent Russian troops from taking over the airfield of Kosovo's provincial capital."
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/jatras12.html

Secondly the linked article on GlobalResearch.com does mention the word "disinformation" in a header, before listing a lot of possible reasons and perpetrators of the Bengazi attack. But what the two authors of that article doesn't mention besides their listing of 13 or so possible perpetrators, is the "October surprise" dimension. I.e. a false-flag to make President Obama into a "President Jimmy Carter", a weak president who cant handle foreign "evil" powers taking Americans as hostages, or taking their lives, and by that - as Carter - will be in a position to be exchanged for a more "suitable" man (Romney) in the coming US presidential elections.

Below are some links to articles that point in the direction of a "October surprice" false flag (there might be more recent articles now on the net):

Wayne Madsen, Sept. 20, 2012:
A «Price Tag» October Surprise in September for Obama
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2012/09/20/a-price-tag-october-surprise-in-september-for-obama.html

Wayne Madsen, Sept. 27, 2012:
Anti-Islam film aims to force Obama support Israel attack on Iran
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/19/262454/antiislam-film-aims-to-corner-obama/

Hans (Germany) said (October 24, 2012):

Good article, but the reference to "islamic" nations can be misleading. Iraq under Hussein was purely secular and staunchly anti-fundamentalist. The Illuminati require islamic-fundamentalist regimes, to polarize, and to find prefixes to start an other world war. Countries like Iraq with a high living standard and a peacful life of Christians and Muslims next to each other do not fit the required stereotype.

Another reason for the war on Iraq may have been the fact, that in Bagdhad alone lived 300.000 Christians without any problems. The so-called "west" is more satanic than any "Muslim country" aka Arabic nation could ever be, and goal No.one of the west is to exterminate Christianity, the only stumbling block to the NWO.

Lybia was "guilty" of having again a very high living standard. Gaddhafi certainly didn't rape, murder and rob his own people, and handing the loot and all assets over to banks, which is standard procedure of "western democracies".

Not 40% of Lybians were living on food stamps, but 40% of Americans are! Now NATO sends their Al-Queda-puppets to Syria, to produce another "gaza-nisation" of a nation, followed by installing another regime of fake Muslim fundamentalists, who can be useful to pose as future enemies, giving further opportunity for war, more murder, more death, more blood sacrifice, more profits, and so on.

KP said (October 24, 2012):

It is a shame so many Americans (and Westerners) have no idea of the emphasis placed by the NWO on destroying Islamic nations of the Middle East.

NO revolution in the Mideast has been initiated by internal pressure. Rather, NATO and its agents have instigated and pushed for the toppling of leaders with the hope of inserting more compliant (pro zionist, pro bankster) agents in positions of power.

Bashar al-Assad has valiantly resisted the NWO's advances on Syria. His resistance is important, as the NWO cannot step into (on) Iran without first overthrowing and installing a compliant regime in Syria.

Each true Muslim nation of the world is under direct and indirect assault from the NWO and its agent, NATO. Is this because real Muslims comprehend that Usury is an immoral activity that offends God?

Dan said (October 23, 2012):

This article is spot on. The media story that embassy was attacked over a 14 minute soft porn video insulting Mohammed was nonsense. It was 'blowback' for smashing Libya's beautiful infrastructure that Gaddafi built for the people over the course of forty years.

In a speech given in Denmark in 2011 Vladimir Putin asked "Who gave NATO the right to kill Gaddafi?" Two years earlier Gaddafi was given over an hour at the podium of the United Nations to address the Assembly as the leader of a member nation.

Gaddafi held up a copy of the United Nations charter and complained that despite the promise of 'equality' between all member nations, that the Big Four do as they please.

Hillary Clinton and Obama of the US, Cameron of Britain, Sarkozy of France, and Italy muscled the little nations of NATO to go along with what amounted to national piracy.

Gaddafi's 2009 UN speech is worth listening to. Compare it with the comic book rhetoric that Obama and Romney gave us in the "debates".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuMTzyxAuzs&feature=related

"In some ways this speech is prophetic , as Gaddafi identifies the very inequities inherent in the UN that were to become the instruments of his murder & the annihilation of Libya."

Asim said (October 23, 2012):

Read the latest article with great interest. I would add another country to America's hit list-and arguably, it's penultimate target-Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia has the worlds largest oil reserves but more importantly, it i the nerve centre of orthodox islam via Makkah and Medina. Once this nation completely falls under the illuminati's control-then all hell will truly break loose worldwide.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Archives >>