Direct Link to Latest News


How the Illuminati are Reordering the Middle East

August 6, 2014


To understand events in the Middle East,
such as the advent of ISIS, we should listen
to revelations made by retired General Wesley Clark
in March 2007:

As early as 2001, the "Pentagon" had plans to
take down
seven Islamic countries, Iraq, Syria,
Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.

(Updated from Oct.23, 2012)

by Richard Evans 

In 1997, a group of Republicans formed a non-profit organization called the Project For A New American Century (PNAC). In their first white paper, Rebuilding America's Defenses, they proposed taking down Saddam Hussein, Iraq and then reordering the entire Middle East. Parenthetically, they admitted that selling such plans to the American people would take a long time, "absent some catastrophic catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor." ( p.51) 

September 11, 2001 was obviously just what they had in mind. 

In 2000, the US Supreme Court selected another Bush as the 43rd US President and he waited until 9/11 to begin reordering the world. 

In that connection, in March 2007, retired General Wesley Clark told Amy Goodman on her Democracy Now TV program that as early as September 2001, the Pentagon already had plans to take down seven Islamic countries, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. If you have not seen the short You Tube of General Clark's revelations on Democracy Now, it is worth watching 

At that time, I was skeptical about such a large US Military operation, because we all knew The Bush Administration lied us into Iraq with phony stories of Weapons of Mass Destruction, yellowcake uranium, mobile biological weapons labs, etc. 

In 2007, the US Military only occupied Afghanistan and Iraq, so I asked myself, "How will the White House justify the military cost to the American people of invading Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran?" 

By 2011, the answer became clear. The unnecessary wars against Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia and Sudan would be staged covertly as irregular military coups with the US Military and CIA supporting PHONY democracy or "Islamist"movements.

Remember the baloney about 'Arab Spring' and the spontaneous 'Twitter' revolutions supporting "civil unrest" in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya? 

Was the USA behind these civil wars and bogus democracy movements? OF COURSE! 

Remember 2011 when Libyan Al-Qaeda could not budge Gaddafi's Libyan Army, the US and NATO enforced a NO Fly Zone over Libya and launched hundreds of cruise missiles in support of Al-Qaeda and the rebels. 

By Oct 20, 2011 Muammar Gaddafi was a dead man and Libya was a war torn shattered nation. But no one in America feels the least bit guilty about America's role in trashing Libya. Most people believe these events were spontaneous democratic revolutions. Doesn't anyone remember the PNAC's plans to reorder the Middle East?


In Sept. 2012, we lost Ambassador Steven in an attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi. The press wants us to think that we brought "freedom and democracy" to Libya, not chaos and death. They want us to believe that there is no Green Resistance to the NATO or its Al-Qaeda allies in Benghazi, but everyone in Libya knows about the Green Resistance, whose members are called "Tahloob" (Arabic for "Gaddafi loyalists"). 

In reality, the Green Resistance destroyed the US Consulate in Benghazi September 11, 2012. They have been increasingly active since shortly after the murder of Muammar Gaddafi in October 2011. They strike any NATO target they can, and they execute key Libyans who betrayed Gaddafi and sided with NATO. The Benghazi incident was merely their latest blow against what they see as NATO's illegal occupation of their country. Ignoring the Tahloob only happens outside of Libya, by the NATO powers and their subservient media. 

In Egypt, President Mohamed Morsi of the radical Muslim Brotherhood replaced moderate Hosni Mubarak, and he was subsequently deposed.  While Obama and Romney trade accusations about whether The Obama Administration was guilty of leaving the grounds of the Benghazi Consulate vulnerable, THERE IS NO SERIOUS DISCUSSION REGARDING WHETHER THE US MILITARY SHOULD SUPPORT THESE PHONY REVOLUTIONS IN THE FIRST PLACE. 


More disturbing is the US Congress is side-stepping its US Constitutional duty to declare war, but the press ignores this failure too. The CIA shouldn't decide whether we go to war. The US Congress should debate and decide, so Congressmen can be responsible to the American people come election time.

There is a Constitutional debate in America regarding whether Obama is in violation of the War Power Act in regard to Libya, BUT THE MEDIA IGNORES THIS VIOLATION. 

"May 20, 2011, marked the 60th day of US combat in Libya (as part of the UN resolution) but the deadline arrived without President Obama seeking specific authorization from the US Congress. President Obama, however, notified Congress that no authorization was needed, since the US leadership was transferred to NATO, and since US involvement is somewhat limited. On Friday, June 3, 2011, the US House of Representatives voted to rebuke President Obama for maintaining an American presence in the NATO operations in Libya, which they considered a violation of the War Powers Resolution."


The purpose of this reordering of the Middle East is to remove or weaken any power that is independent of the Illuminati central bankers, represented by the NATO powers and Israel.

It is progressing well. Libya is in chaos. Syria is in ruins. Iraq is in turmoil. So are Somalia and Sudan. ISIS is establishing a "Caliphate" that reaches from Northern Iraq across Syria to Lebanon. 

The only country left standing is Iran, and given its increasingly close ties with Russia, we assume the Illuminati is saving that for a world war.


First Comment from Marcos:

The Illuminati strategy in the Middle East makes little sense unless we understand some of their esoteric beliefs. Talmud Jews expect the arrival of Messiah Ben-Yosef, a military leader who will crush Israel's enemies and enable the world empire of Messiah Ben-David. The occultist Illuminati share a similar belief in a global leader (Christians call him the antichrist) who will rule from Jerusalem.

For these extraordinary events to happen, a traumatizing war must occur first. It should be much easier to promote this total war if all Israel's neighbors are crazy fanatics prone to violence, and not moderates such as Mubarak. Let the tension grow and nuke them all in retaliation for some false flag or real attack on Tel-Aviv with a dirty bomb or biological weapon launched from Syria or Iraq. 

This view would explain why Israel is unnecessarily cruel in his actions against Gaza and Lebanon, targeting civilians with no objective military advantage. The more the Arabs hate Israel, the higher the tension and the closer the total war. 

Comment from Jim Perloff:

The Evans article and comment by Marcos are superb.  The 2007 Wesley Clark clip jives completely with Pat Buchanan's Feb 16, 2004 column  in which he wrote:
"In 1996, in a strategy paper crafted for Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser urged him to 'focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power' as an 'Israeli strategic objective.' Perle, Feith, Wurmser were all on Bush's foreign policy team on 9-11. . .
On Jan. 1, 2001, nine months before 9-11, Wurmser called for U.S.-Israeli attacks 'to broaden the [Middle East] conflict to strike fatally . . . the regimes of Damascus, Baghdad, Tripoli, Teheran and Gaza . . . to establish the recognition that fighting with either the United States or Israel is suicidal.'
'Crises can be opportunities,' added Wurmser. On Sept. 11, opportunity struck."
The elimination of Saddam Hussein, Gadaffi, Mubarak (as well as the intended removal of Assad) are obviously part of long-range plan to throw the Middle East into chaos; 9-11 was the false-flag catalyst to make it happen. As to the probable purpose of this chaos, I could not summarize it better than Marcos has.  Why else is the mainstream media suddenly publishing pictures of Palestinian victims, something it normally never does?  They would love to enrage disorganized Muslims into fighting a war against Israel with its state-of-the art American weapons.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "How the Illuminati are Reordering the Middle East"

JG said (August 6, 2014):

The "global chess players" like the PNAC creators are made up with dual Israeli/American citizens. This makes them immune from prosecution in America because they are allowed to retreat to Israel without being tried as American citizens. Therefore, for all intensive purposes, they are a literally foreign agents operating with immunity and impunity.

This was NOT a Republican Party thing. The "Neo Cons" have successfully infiltrated both parties in Washington, Democrats and Republicans. The completed hijacking of the American Oval Office took place under the George Bush Administration with the suspension of the US Constitution after 911.

Like Bush, the present Obama White House is under their misdirection and mercy. The present Foreign Policy of America is authored by them with America being used as the military enforcer for the coming Marxist World Order Government both here and abroad. Homeland Security was also their creation designed to thwart any internal domestic opposition that challenges their plan or authority.

Washington is in complete denial of their own takeover by this foreign entity because their power is present in almost all governmental agencies as well as non governmental agencies.
What these politicians don't understand is that America will be "holding the ball" when Neo Cons like Richard Perle claim no responsibility for the PNAC agenda that has inflicted chaos on the Islamic Nations.They will turn on America in a "heartbeat" and proclaim themselves the victims once again.

America's last chance is to become Russia's friend and ally RIGHT NOW and break from these agents of the NWO who seek to destroy them and the world.

Krister said (October 25, 2012):

Firstly General Wesley Clark, quoted in the article might not be the best peace-angel:

"I'm not going to start the third world war for you," General Sir Mike Jackson, commander of the international KFOR peacekeeping force, is reported to have told Gen. Clark when he refused to accept an order to send assault troops to prevent Russian troops from taking over the airfield of Kosovo's provincial capital."

Secondly the linked article on does mention the word "disinformation" in a header, before listing a lot of possible reasons and perpetrators of the Bengazi attack. But what the two authors of that article doesn't mention besides their listing of 13 or so possible perpetrators, is the "October surprise" dimension. I.e. a false-flag to make President Obama into a "President Jimmy Carter", a weak president who cant handle foreign "evil" powers taking Americans as hostages, or taking their lives, and by that - as Carter - will be in a position to be exchanged for a more "suitable" man (Romney) in the coming US presidential elections.

Below are some links to articles that point in the direction of a "October surprice" false flag (there might be more recent articles now on the net):

Wayne Madsen, Sept. 20, 2012:
A «Price Tag» October Surprise in September for Obama

Wayne Madsen, Sept. 27, 2012:
Anti-Islam film aims to force Obama support Israel attack on Iran

Hans (Germany) said (October 24, 2012):

Good article, but the reference to "islamic" nations can be misleading. Iraq under Hussein was purely secular and staunchly anti-fundamentalist. The Illuminati require islamic-fundamentalist regimes, to polarize, and to find prefixes to start an other world war. Countries like Iraq with a high living standard and a peacful life of Christians and Muslims next to each other do not fit the required stereotype.

Another reason for the war on Iraq may have been the fact, that in Bagdhad alone lived 300.000 Christians without any problems. The so-called "west" is more satanic than any "Muslim country" aka Arabic nation could ever be, and goal of the west is to exterminate Christianity, the only stumbling block to the NWO.

Lybia was "guilty" of having again a very high living standard. Gaddhafi certainly didn't rape, murder and rob his own people, and handing the loot and all assets over to banks, which is standard procedure of "western democracies".

Not 40% of Lybians were living on food stamps, but 40% of Americans are! Now NATO sends their Al-Queda-puppets to Syria, to produce another "gaza-nisation" of a nation, followed by installing another regime of fake Muslim fundamentalists, who can be useful to pose as future enemies, giving further opportunity for war, more murder, more death, more blood sacrifice, more profits, and so on.

KP said (October 24, 2012):

It is a shame so many Americans (and Westerners) have no idea of the emphasis placed by the NWO on destroying Islamic nations of the Middle East.

NO revolution in the Mideast has been initiated by internal pressure. Rather, NATO and its agents have instigated and pushed for the toppling of leaders with the hope of inserting more compliant (pro zionist, pro bankster) agents in positions of power.

Bashar al-Assad has valiantly resisted the NWO's advances on Syria. His resistance is important, as the NWO cannot step into (on) Iran without first overthrowing and installing a compliant regime in Syria.

Each true Muslim nation of the world is under direct and indirect assault from the NWO and its agent, NATO. Is this because real Muslims comprehend that Usury is an immoral activity that offends God?

Dan said (October 23, 2012):

This article is spot on. The media story that embassy was attacked over a 14 minute soft porn video insulting Mohammed was nonsense. It was 'blowback' for smashing Libya's beautiful infrastructure that Gaddafi built for the people over the course of forty years.

In a speech given in Denmark in 2011 Vladimir Putin asked "Who gave NATO the right to kill Gaddafi?" Two years earlier Gaddafi was given over an hour at the podium of the United Nations to address the Assembly as the leader of a member nation.

Gaddafi held up a copy of the United Nations charter and complained that despite the promise of 'equality' between all member nations, that the Big Four do as they please.

Hillary Clinton and Obama of the US, Cameron of Britain, Sarkozy of France, and Italy muscled the little nations of NATO to go along with what amounted to national piracy.

Gaddafi's 2009 UN speech is worth listening to. Compare it with the comic book rhetoric that Obama and Romney gave us in the "debates".

"In some ways this speech is prophetic , as Gaddafi identifies the very inequities inherent in the UN that were to become the instruments of his murder & the annihilation of Libya."

Asim said (October 23, 2012):

Read the latest article with great interest. I would add another country to America's hit list-and arguably, it's penultimate target-Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia has the worlds largest oil reserves but more importantly, it i the nerve centre of orthodox islam via Makkah and Medina. Once this nation completely falls under the illuminati's control-then all hell will truly break loose worldwide.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at