"Solitary Man" - Jewish Morality Tale
August 6, 2010
"If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the GOY communities to such an extent the they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of those spectacles we are setting astride their noses..." (Protocols of Zion, 12, v)
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
Michael Douglas' latest movie "The Solitary Man" is about a Jew but the "J" word isn't mentioned once. The writer, directors and almost everyone in the movie are Jewish but this fact is passed over too.
Why is this? So the audience can better identify?
The assumption is that, doing good or bad, everyone behaves like Jews. Thus the audience can learn the dominant cultural assumptions and norms without being aware of it.
The movies portray life through the lens of Illuminati Jewish and homosexual concerns which have supplanted our authentic ones. Like education, entertainment is really indoctrination.
Few movies depict life as the majority of Americans experience it. For example, the Credit Crash and its aftermath was the dominant event of the last two years, but I can't think of one feature film devoted to it. Nor one about Hurricane Katrina either.
Nor are there any movies about courageous Americans (Henry Ford, Louis McFadden, Charles Lindbergh, Joseph McCarthy, James Forrestal or Whitaker Chambers) who fought the international bankers and their Communist Jewish agents. These patriots had dramatic lives and some were killed, but they have been stigmatized and marginalized by the colonial elite.
They have brainwashed the masses to see any resistance to this elite as "anti-Semitism," something even Jews admit is a cheap psychological trick.
The universe of "Solitary Man" consists of super rich New York Jews who run the world's corporations and universities, ooze self righteous unction and chase after money and status. One aging Jew, Ben Kalman, (Michael Douglas) has tripped and fallen in this forced march to earthly nirvana.
When his doctor prescribed a heart test, he panicked at the prospect of death. Instead of just taking the test, Kalman cheats on his wife and customers at his lucrative car dealerships, and suffers a public humiliation. (Implausible plot point # One.)
When we meet him, Michael Douglas is long in the tooth and down on his luck. But he is still dapper enough to date a uber wealthy Jewish divorcee who happens to have the Board of BMW in her pocket.
In spite of this, she needs Kalman to take her daughter to Vassar, where he was a big donor, and sweet talk the Dean into admitting her. (Implausible plot point #Two.)
This rich divorcee is arranging for Kalman to get a prized BMW location. Nevertheless, he jeopardizes his comeback by betraying the woman's trust and sleeping with her 18-year-old daughter. (Implausible plot point #Three.)
He seems to think sex with a young slut who cares nothing for him is worth throwing away his life.
For course, the girl gets rid of him by telling mom. The dealership falls through. Kalman is left begging for crumbs from his daughter, ex-wife and an old friend.
But this doesn't stop him from sniffing around for more 18-year-olds, which is excruciating to watch. Michael Douglas is 66 and looks it.
So there's your Jewish morality tale. Forget that democracy is going down the drain; Congress has been bought; the President is an impostor; 9-11 was an inside job. Forget we have been fighting needless wars for decades.
Ben Kalman is acting out. That's what's important. He's a bad Jew. The good Jews--his daughter, wife, private banker and BMW representative-- tell him to be a mensch and put wife and family first. Danny Devito, the token Gentile, says the same thing. At the end, it looks like he'll go back to his wife.
After all, he has no options left.
Apparently, when it comes to defining the world, neither do we.
Related Makow - "Does Hollywood Airbrush Jews and Gays?"
Makow-- "Hollywood's Scathing Portrayal of Jews"
Comments for ""Solitary Man" - Jewish Morality Tale"
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at