Direct Link to Latest News


"The Grey" - Luciferian Movie Not About Masculinity

June 18, 2012


Far from an affirmation of masculinity, "The Grey"
is typical Cabalistic negation of God
and assertion of the
 Illuminati right to rule.

by Aspen

The Grey is the Illuminati pinnacle of Liam Neeson's film career.

There is one scene, near to the Kabbalistic finale of the film, which delivers the first central messages of the film.

In this scene, Neeson's character, Ottway, is lying on his back, on a  snowbank looking up at the sky, and appealing to God for help. Ottway is an atheist, but he gives God one final chance.

Ottway has been through living hell. His wife is dead from disease; hence his atheism. He has survived both his own suicidal tendencies and then a plane crash in the Alaskan wilderness, only then to be forced to lead a tattered band of ignorant fools as wolves pick them off one by one.

In this penultimate scene, Ottway looks up at the sky and challenges God.  [To paraphrase],

"Okay, I'm CALLING on you. Do something. Do anything. I swear to you, if you do something, I will believe in you forever."

He waits.

"I'm giving you the chance. DO SOMETHING."

The wind blows; the trees shake.

"Fuck it," Ottway says, "I'll do it myself."

By this time, everyone else in the film is dead. Most died in the plane crash. One of the survivors got his throat ripped out by circling wolves, because he ignored Ottway's basic advice.

Another, a fat black man, died of oxygen deprivation. Another died because he was half-blind and lost his glasses; he couldn't SEE.

One was picked off because he couldn't keep up. One chose to lay himself down and let the wolves come to him. The last one drowned when he lost his footing in a river.


The name "Ottway" is uncommon. The name itself means "fortunate warrior" -- but of greater significance is the motto of the British family Crest of Ottway, "If God be with us, who can be against us?"

That is precisely the point the film is intended to illustrate:  GOD IS NOT INVOLVED. God does not care. God will not move to ACT. God does not answer prayer. No one comes when you pray to God.

Ottway survives by asserting his will, not his faith.


Ottway tells the other characters about a poem that his father composed:

"Once more into the fray
"into the last good fight I'll ever know
"live and die on this day
"live and die on this day"

The final spoken line of the film is given as Ottway is readying himself to battle with the black-furred Alpha Wolf of the pack.

It's delivered as a sudden understanding, a full realization of the extremity of the situation, with a connection to history.

"Live and die on this day. THIS IS THE DAY!"

The screen fades out; the credits roll.


This IS "the day", isn't it? This is the time of the penultimate attack of the Illuminati Wolf.


To quote Douglas Rushkoff, in his well-known work "Nothing Sacred: The Truth About Judaism":

"[Jewish] iconoclasm leads to the conclusion that any God must, ultimately, be a universal and nameless God. The natural result of settling for an abstract and unknowable deity is to then focus, instead, on human beings and life itself as the supremely sacred vessels of existence...

"If God cannot be conceived in any way, if his existence is utterly out of the reach of human systems of belief and intellect, then for all practical purposes he does not exist.... God is just not something that Jews are supposed to worry about....

"In this light, abstract monotheism is not the process by which a people find the one true God, but the path through which they get over their need for him."

[Rushkoff, Nothing Sacred, pp. 14, 29]


The Grey is intended as an elemental representation of the Luciferian vector of Judaism that has been adopted by the Illuminati.

Judaism is not Satanism; most Jews can barely handle the refined characterization of Judaism that Rushkoff presents in his book.

However, it is both arguable and likely that a combination of Rushkoff-style Judaism, and longer-serving pagan religions, have produced what we know as Luciferian religion today.

We know that the Illuminati enjoy their self-characterization as Wolves amongst Sheep. There is no film that follows this theme better, than The Grey.

This is a film that affirms the Luciferian rebellion against God.


Makow comment: Men have to do God's work. That's the whole point of life. God's work, not Lucifer's.

S.A. Eick Replies to Aspen:


Let me get my head around this. Constant flashbacks to tenderness and romantic love between committed partners in a loving relationship (compared, to say the latest Rihanna video with bondage, sexual violence, allusions to group sex), two solid representations of unapologetic un-castrated masculinity (the protagonist and his father), constant displays of masculine courage and endurance in the face of impossible odds (which is of course exactly what any Luciferian worth their Satanic salt would be promoting amongst the masses in this day and age), and a central character who steps away from the mindless debauchery and distractions of his peers to go on a solitary inward journey through intense personal suffering. All this is Luciferian? Really?

So basically, the moment at which he questions faith and God, having watched everyone around him perish, including his wife, reveals him as a Luciferian.. I'm not quite buying this - it seems like a totally normal reaction to the circumstances. Neither am I buying that his decision to solve his problems himself is a Luciferian act. If there is a God I suspect that he relies on human beings to manifest his principles, just as if there is a Devil I suspect he does the same. Humans are the agents of good and evil, and it is through choice and direct independent action that we are capable of creating the conditions for good or evil to thrive and prosper. To my mind a man who pathetically waited for a divine being to beam down and beat an alpha wolf for him (as Neeson does in a moment of obvious weakness) would be the kind of neutered being who'd stick around and wait for someone else to challenge evil rather than dusting himself off and taking it on himself.

The poem at the end.. 'live and die on this day' is a call to action, a call to courage, a call to live intensely, fearlessly and unconditionally in the moment, which some might say is the ultimate homage not only to true masculinity but also to the creator and creation.


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for ""The Grey" - Luciferian Movie Not About Masculinity"

C said (June 21, 2012):

I watched this movie yesterday, I had this overwhelming sense that this movie had twisted reality, for instance the so-called ex cons at the drilling site were the victims rather than the perpetrators, the wolves were literally stalking and killing them, when it was Ottways job previously. Perhaps the wolves were sheep in wolves clothing, perhaps this was judgment day? Perhaps the cold represented the absence of God?

On a whole this was God being shown as a petty evil torturer, Neeson was Lucifer, the hero of the hour, trying to lead his own disciples to safety. We even see the change that Ottway makes on the one who sacrifices his life. All the while Ottway acknowledges the existence of God whilst denying him the glory. A previous article says that Neeson displays masculine virtues. Yes he does, but I think they all do to a degree. The only difference is they are demonstrated as a weakness, in that every single person died, not one of them attained salvation spiritually.

Mariel said (June 19, 2012):

I suppose Liam Neeson chooses his roles, and is therefore responsible in part for what they illustrate in
our life. But I have thought of him more as just a hunk and a skillful actor, not a purveyor of philosophical
truth. However, he might wake up and read this material and think about doing something better next time.

In Schindler's List, his foremost role, he played a Catholic who helped Jews. Not an atheist. But that was a
long time ago. He brought amazing life to Schindler. And wasn't that also directed by Spielberg? Maybe both
are discouraged now. Life has run over them with a truck, as it has all of us, as the Lord predicted in Matthew 24
and elsewhere in the Bible: the "last days", the birthpangs of the tribulation, would be horrible, and the tribulation
the worst event of history.

Someone mentions Job from the Bible. Job had faith that no matter what happened to him, he would "stand on his
own feet in the last days" and see God. Isaiah uttered similar words in Isaiah 19:26. An emphasis on the next world,
the world to come, would cure some of this despair, but now we are expected to live without that hope. This is the
final misery inflicted by the Illuminati, who want us to die in bed like the slaves in Brave New World, comfortable
but without hope of the resurrection.

Len said (June 19, 2012):

Let me just add my voice to say that I think Aspen's insights on the movie, "The Gray" is 100% on the money.

luciferianism is the outgrowth of rejecting THE PERSONAL GOD Who made Himself known through His Son, The Suffering Servant Messiah-Redeemer, most perfectly.

The "god" that they worship and serve is self, pleasure. occultic-knowledge, power, and "will". and it always leads to a nazi-type of control-freak fascism.

Guy said (June 19, 2012):

Like other correspondents apparently, I cannot think Liam Neeson is any different from the rest of the Hollywood crowd – all Actors are prostitutes; he did, after all, star in the name role of (Alfred) ‘Kinsey’. If he was a good, honest man who had done his research, he would have had nothing to do with the film.
I have never come across any evidence that he has had second thoughts on the bogus mainstream view of Kinsey that that film was propagating to a mass audience. But he must have done the research.

The sickness, criminality and the ruination and exploitation of all those lives that have accrued on a massive scale both as a direct result of Kinsey’s ‘research’ and in the long term effect of it – Liam Neeson will not have lost one night’s sleep over that; not because he is a particularly terrible individual – I am sure he has many fine qualities – but because we are living in an age of Mass Psychosis and most people go along with it.

Nah – there is no good in trusting anyone at that level, not Clint Eastwood or anybody! Maybe only Mel Gibson, but probably not even then.


Thanks Guy

I eventually saw Kinsey and was surprised at how much accuracy was included, including the fact he died from a disease related to "self abuse."


Andrew said (June 19, 2012):

Very interesting. I have not seen this movie yet. I haven't seen many new films lately because they have become so expensive that I can't justify the cost.

Aspen, I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts regarding Steven Spielberg's obsession with aliens. I watched his latest project, "Falling Skies", last night and the belief that there is no God (or He cannot help us) seems to be common among his films.

I'd also be interested in hearing what the general consensus is about the film "Braveheart". William Wallace's speech sure doesn't jive with the whole live on your knees instead of dying on your feet mentality.

Hans said (June 19, 2012):

I have not seen the film, but noted something in the article: "..but of greater significance is the motto of the British family Crest of Ottway, "If God be with us, who can be against us?"." This is, in fact, a direct quote from the Bible. "What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?" So does Paul say to all true Christians, in Romans, Chapter 8:31.

In the Bible, this passage is a reassurance that no-one can trump God, he gives safety and security.

In the Film, the meaning of the verse is twisted into a "family motto" and conveys the message "God is not involved. God does not care", as Aspen correctly describes.

Another example of how the Illuminati (mis)use the Bible like a script, but shifting the meaning of the word of God into the opposite.

The motive: to discredit the Bible and to separate the individual from God.

Justin said (June 19, 2012):

“Aspen” is totally correct. The pile of dolts against which his Character is contrasted, and their helpless stupidity, serve to enlarge the courage of this godless Man, only by comparison. Since stumbling, and bumbling, about in “Rob Roy”, against Tim Roth’s over-the-top villainous, but expert, Fencer, only landing a lucky shot to end that tired and tedious contest, we have been insulted by Liam Neeson. Now, it’s God’s fault.

Who is this shlub to suddenly demand God’s presence? As He said to Job: “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell me, if you have understanding.” The arrogance is astounding. He’s not my Butler, so he doesn’t exist. Demands don’t work.

He can ‘Release all the Krakens’ he wants. This guy, Liam, is a Tool of the ‘Controllers’.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at