The Dreyfus Affair Was A Rothschild Psy-Op
September 16, 2009
by Henry Makow Ph.D,
In 1894, a French artillery captain, Alfred Dreyfus, was falsely accused of passing secrets to the Germans. A Jew, he seemed to confirm the belief that Jews, led by Baron Edmund de Rothschild, constituted a fifth column and undermined French independence and culture.
Dreyfus was publicly stripped of his commission and given a life sentence at Devil's Island where he was put in leg irons. Throughout his trial and imprisonment, Dreyfus professed his innocence.
The Dreyfus Affair was an elaborate psy-op. The real spy , Ferdinand Esterhazy, was in the pay of Baron Edmund de Rothschild. They deliberately implicated the Jew Dreyfus so that when he was finally vindicated, the conservative anti-Semitic anti-Rothschild party would be humiliated and discredited.
In 1895, the new Intelligence Chief Georges Picquart was fed evidence that the spy was actually Esterhazy, who was not a Jew. Nevertheless the army, its prestige at stake, buried the new information and forged new evidence against Dreyfus. Picquart was exiled to a remote location. Anti-Semitism flourished in the army and there was a strong bias against Dreyfus. The Rothschilds used this to entrap them.
The Esterhazy information was "leaked" to the press and for ten years France was convulsed (destabilized) as the nationalists (army, landowners and church) faced off against the Dreyfus family, liberals and socialists demanding justice. Governments fell, anti-Semitic rioters roamed the streets, duels were fought, and the whole world watched in dismay. Emile Zola, a Rothschild protege and Freemason, wrote the famous "J'Accuse" exposing the cover-up. Celebrities signed petitions demanding justice for the innocent Jewish artillery captain.
Eventually Esterhazy was fired, escaped to England and, in 1899, admitted he was the spy. Nevertheless the government and army dug itself a deeper hole, ignoring the evidence and prosecuting Dreyfus' defenders. Inevitably, the government changed and after numerous trials and appeals, partial reality was finally recognized.
Dreyfus was exonerated in 1906 and made "Chevalier of the Legion of Honor" in the same courtyard where he had been disgraced. The forces of religion, nation and anti-Semitism were discredited. All history books tell this story in terms of a comforting morality play where the innocent Jew (Dreyfus-Rothschild) is vindicated. Dreyfus was innocent but Rothschild certainly was not.
WHAT ARE THE CHANCES?
The man guilty of the treasonous acts blamed on Dreyfus, Major Ferdinand Esterhazy, was an agent of Baron Edmund de Rothschild.
Esterhazy was a translator with the French General Staff. In July 1894, he approached the German Military Attache in Paris, Von Schwartzkoppen, saying that financial duress compelled him to sell military secrets. In fact, Esterhazy had just received a large sum from Edmund de Rothschild in June 1894. He had been a schoolmate of Edmund de Rothschild, and this was only one of many payments. (Herbert Lottman, The French Rothschilds The Great Banking Dynasty Through Two Turbulent Centuries, 1995, pp. 115-117)
There are many other indications that the whole "Dreyfus Affair" was orchestrated. At the beginning, news of Captain Dreyfus' guilt was leaked to the anti-Semitic newspaper "La Libre Parole." The publisher Edouard Drumont took the bait and began a vitriolic campaign against the Jewish officer. In fact, Esterhazy was also a friend of Drumont.
It is possible that Drumont was financed by the Rothschilds. The Protocols of Zion
acknowledge funding anti-Semitic publications. This may explain why anti-Semites blame all Jews instead of focusing on the Rothschilds and their Sabbatean/Masonic confreres. Similarly, socialists never mention the Rothschilds when attacking capitalism.
In Jan 1898, Emile Zola published his "J'Accuse" in the newspaper L'Aurore edited by Freemason and future Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau. Zola was charged with libel and sentenced to a year in jail and fined 3000 francs. In 1902, Zola died "accidentally" in his home, poisoned by carbon monoxide. Did he learn something he should not have?
According to Frederick Brown's Zola: A Life, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 888 pp, 1995: In a deathbed confession decades after Zola's death was ruled accident by coroner and the press, a Paris roofer confessed to closing the flu on Zola's chimney on purpose. The roofer didn't allude to a conspiracy, only said he did it for "political reasons".
In the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the author refers to their ability to make the murders of Masons who become an obstacle look natural. On the other hand, it could have been inspired by anti-Dreyfus feelings.
On Feb. 16, 1899 the President of the Republic Felix Faure died suddenly in his office. He had just met with an exponent of Dreyfus' cause and argued. There was speculation he was poisoned. Faure was succeeded by Emile Loubert, a supporter of Dreyfus. The Rothschild press made up a story that he died while having sex, and this is repeated in Wikipedia.
SIGNIFICANCE
Edmund de Rothschild (1845-1934) was the man who financed the Zionist colonization of Palestine. Like the Holocaust, the Dreyfus Affair told assimilated Jews that they must have a country of their own. It is legend that the Hungarian-Jewish journalist Theodor Herzl was greatly affected by the Dreyfus trial and its aftermath.
According to Wikipedia, "Soon afterward, Herzl wrote Der Judenstaat (The Jewish State, 1896) and founded the World Zionist Organization, which called for the creation of a Jewish State in Palestine. The anti-Semitism and injustice revealed in France by the conviction of Alfred Dreyfus had a radicalizing effect on Herzl, demonstrating to him that Jews, despite the Enlightenment and Jewish assimilation, could never hope for fair treatment in European society."
This is another example of how the Rothschilds secretly incite anti-Semitism in order to dupe Jews into advancing their demented scheme for a world government based in Israel. The same principle guided the Jewish holocaust where millions of innocent Jews became Dreyfus and worse. In the Protocols, the author refers to the "management of our lesser brethren." He means: inciting anti-Semitism.
Sponsoring Hitler was just a few levels of duplicity above sponsoring Esterhazy. In both cases, the French and German "anti-Semites" fell into the trap.
Thus, the Rothschilds trick Jews who want to assimilate into acting as agents and human shields for their Satanic agenda. The same Jews, of course, will be blamed.
CONCLUSION
The Dreyfus Affair is yet another example of how historical events are manufactured by the Rothschilds for their psychological and political value. Looking back, we have:
9-11; the Kennedy Assassination; the Cold War; Vietnam War; Korean War; Hiroshima; Second World War, the Jewish holocaust; Pearl Harbor and so on...
Obviously the Rothschilds' mass media helps them put over their subterfuges . Another example of their duplicity is the phony banker's coup of 1933, which was used to give their pawn FDR credibility. Social movements and ideologies are also Rothschild psy-ops: sexual liberation, women's liberation, the civil rights movement, gay rights, feminism, diversity, multiculturalism.
We can apply these lessons today by looking at current events in terms of how they advance the New World Order.
---
I am indebted to Carol White, "The New Dark Ages Conspiracy" (1980) pp. 45-48 for alerting me to this information.
In 1894, a French artillery captain, Alfred Dreyfus, was falsely accused of passing secrets to the Germans. A Jew, he seemed to confirm the belief that Jews, led by Baron Edmund de Rothschild, constituted a fifth column and undermined French independence and culture.
Dreyfus was publicly stripped of his commission and given a life sentence at Devil's Island where he was put in leg irons. Throughout his trial and imprisonment, Dreyfus professed his innocence.
The Dreyfus Affair was an elaborate psy-op. The real spy , Ferdinand Esterhazy, was in the pay of Baron Edmund de Rothschild. They deliberately implicated the Jew Dreyfus so that when he was finally vindicated, the conservative anti-Semitic anti-Rothschild party would be humiliated and discredited.
In 1895, the new Intelligence Chief Georges Picquart was fed evidence that the spy was actually Esterhazy, who was not a Jew. Nevertheless the army, its prestige at stake, buried the new information and forged new evidence against Dreyfus. Picquart was exiled to a remote location. Anti-Semitism flourished in the army and there was a strong bias against Dreyfus. The Rothschilds used this to entrap them.
The Esterhazy information was "leaked" to the press and for ten years France was convulsed (destabilized) as the nationalists (army, landowners and church) faced off against the Dreyfus family, liberals and socialists demanding justice. Governments fell, anti-Semitic rioters roamed the streets, duels were fought, and the whole world watched in dismay. Emile Zola, a Rothschild protege and Freemason, wrote the famous "J'Accuse" exposing the cover-up. Celebrities signed petitions demanding justice for the innocent Jewish artillery captain.
Eventually Esterhazy was fired, escaped to England and, in 1899, admitted he was the spy. Nevertheless the government and army dug itself a deeper hole, ignoring the evidence and prosecuting Dreyfus' defenders. Inevitably, the government changed and after numerous trials and appeals, partial reality was finally recognized.
Dreyfus was exonerated in 1906 and made "Chevalier of the Legion of Honor" in the same courtyard where he had been disgraced. The forces of religion, nation and anti-Semitism were discredited. All history books tell this story in terms of a comforting morality play where the innocent Jew (Dreyfus-Rothschild) is vindicated. Dreyfus was innocent but Rothschild certainly was not.
WHAT ARE THE CHANCES? The man guilty of the treasonous acts blamed on Dreyfus, Major Ferdinand Esterhazy, was an agent of Baron Edmund de Rothschild.
Esterhazy was a translator with the French General Staff. In July 1894, he approached the German Military Attache in Paris, Von Schwartzkoppen, saying that financial duress compelled him to sell military secrets. In fact, Esterhazy had just received a large sum from Edmund de Rothschild in June 1894. He had been a schoolmate of Edmund de Rothschild, and this was only one of many payments. (Herbert Lottman, The French Rothschilds The Great Banking Dynasty Through Two Turbulent Centuries, 1995, pp. 115-117)
There are many other indications that the whole "Dreyfus Affair" was orchestrated. At the beginning, news of Captain Dreyfus' guilt was leaked to the anti-Semitic newspaper "La Libre Parole." The publisher Edouard Drumont took the bait and began a vitriolic campaign against the Jewish officer. In fact, Esterhazy was also a friend of Drumont.
It is possible that Drumont was financed by the Rothschilds. The Protocols of Zion
acknowledge funding anti-Semitic publications. This may explain why anti-Semites blame all Jews instead of focusing on the Rothschilds and their Sabbatean/Masonic confreres. Similarly, socialists never mention the Rothschilds when attacking capitalism.
In Jan 1898, Emile Zola published his "J'Accuse" in the newspaper L'Aurore edited by Freemason and future Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau. Zola was charged with libel and sentenced to a year in jail and fined 3000 francs. In 1902, Zola died "accidentally" in his home, poisoned by carbon monoxide. Did he learn something he should not have?
According to Frederick Brown's Zola: A Life, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 888 pp, 1995: In a deathbed confession decades after Zola's death was ruled accident by coroner and the press, a Paris roofer confessed to closing the flu on Zola's chimney on purpose. The roofer didn't allude to a conspiracy, only said he did it for "political reasons".
In the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the author refers to their ability to make the murders of Masons who become an obstacle look natural. On the other hand, it could have been inspired by anti-Dreyfus feelings.
On Feb. 16, 1899 the President of the Republic Felix Faure died suddenly in his office. He had just met with an exponent of Dreyfus' cause and argued. There was speculation he was poisoned. Faure was succeeded by Emile Loubert, a supporter of Dreyfus. The Rothschild press made up a story that he died while having sex, and this is repeated in Wikipedia.
SIGNIFICANCE
Edmund de Rothschild (1845-1934) was the man who financed the Zionist colonization of Palestine. Like the Holocaust, the Dreyfus Affair told assimilated Jews that they must have a country of their own. It is legend that the Hungarian-Jewish journalist Theodor Herzl was greatly affected by the Dreyfus trial and its aftermath. According to Wikipedia, "Soon afterward, Herzl wrote Der Judenstaat (The Jewish State, 1896) and founded the World Zionist Organization, which called for the creation of a Jewish State in Palestine. The anti-Semitism and injustice revealed in France by the conviction of Alfred Dreyfus had a radicalizing effect on Herzl, demonstrating to him that Jews, despite the Enlightenment and Jewish assimilation, could never hope for fair treatment in European society."
This is another example of how the Rothschilds secretly incite anti-Semitism in order to dupe Jews into advancing their demented scheme for a world government based in Israel. The same principle guided the Jewish holocaust where millions of innocent Jews became Dreyfus and worse. In the Protocols, the author refers to the "management of our lesser brethren." He means: inciting anti-Semitism.
Sponsoring Hitler was just a few levels of duplicity above sponsoring Esterhazy. In both cases, the French and German "anti-Semites" fell into the trap.
Thus, the Rothschilds trick Jews who want to assimilate into acting as agents and human shields for their Satanic agenda. The same Jews, of course, will be blamed.
CONCLUSION
The Dreyfus Affair is yet another example of how historical events are manufactured by the Rothschilds for their psychological and political value. Looking back, we have:
9-11; the Kennedy Assassination; the Cold War; Vietnam War; Korean War; Hiroshima; Second World War, the Jewish holocaust; Pearl Harbor and so on...
Obviously the Rothschilds' mass media helps them put over their subterfuges . Another example of their duplicity is the phony banker's coup of 1933, which was used to give their pawn FDR credibility. Social movements and ideologies are also Rothschild psy-ops: sexual liberation, women's liberation, the civil rights movement, gay rights, feminism, diversity, multiculturalism.
We can apply these lessons today by looking at current events in terms of how they advance the New World Order.
---
I am indebted to Carol White, "The New Dark Ages Conspiracy" (1980) pp. 45-48 for alerting me to this information.
Comments for "The Dreyfus Affair Was A Rothschild Psy-Op"
Brent said (September 17, 2009):
Just wanted to drop you a short note expressing my deep gratitude for your wise words and investigative insights today. With so many of us divided and nearly conquered, this level of journalistic work is in incredibly short supply, but almost certainly more desperately needed than at any time in our nation's history (though I am certain Lincoln, Paine and many others could convince me otherwise). In any event, I truly appreciate the great risk you take to make such truths more readily available to more of the masses, since changing the collective conscientiousness may be our only means left for a peaceful Revolution to defeat tyranny.
Besides the main point of your article, which is invaluable and why I distributed a link to it far and wide, the other critical key is for people to GET OVER the puppet Presidency of the U.S. of A., something I have been preaching for awhile and something your article exposes quite well. By showing how even well-loved, four-time President FDR was but a mere pawn, it helps my case that Obama is nothing but a Money Masters' creation in the most Madison Avenue of methods. And OH, how it has worked. Fortunately, the bloom is off the stinking rose. Let's hope and pray that more people will find the true source of nearly all our major issues today...the money manipulating Rothschild Dynasty.
True Freedom in Our Lifetimes,
Brent CFA
B.S. Finance,
One of millions of down-trodden and oppressed Americans who has nearly given up, if not for rare inspiring words like yours
Henry Makow is the author of A Long Way to go for a Date. He received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto. He welcomes your feedback and ideas at
Dan said (September 20, 2009):
Your speculation in the Dreyfus article on why was the Masonic writer Zola murdered got me looking for more clues. I wondered if J'Accuse was enough, since somebody had to exonerated Dreyfus eventually for the real purpose of the frame, which was to give the French Catholics and patriots enough rope to hang themselves by going overboard on innocent Jews over the scandal. The same trick as the Taxil hoax had done during the same era in Paris.
But I think Zola was an idealist who went along with Masonry for a while - quite a while. Zola however thought his way through the spell to understanding something more about Masonry than Horowitz has yet.
It eats it's own.
"And would not Freemasonry eventually be
submerged by its own triumph--that of the ideas of justice, reason, and truth, which it had defended through the dark and violent ages of
history? It is a thing which constantly happens; the victory of an idea kills the sect which has propagated it, and renders the apparatus with
which the members of the sect surrounded themselves, in order to fire imaginations, both useless and somewhat ridiculous.
Carbonarism did not survive the conquest of the political liberties which it demanded; and on
the day when the Catholic Church crumbles, having accomplished its work of civilization, the other Church, the Freemasons' Church of across the
road, will in a like way disappear, its task of liberation ended. "
The Three Cities Trilogy (Les Trois Villes), Complete by Emile Zola
Book, page 863 / 1583