We're all Anti-Semites Now

June 26, 2009


weareall.jpgBy Henry Makow Ph.D.


Anti-Semitism used to refer to a racial prejudice against Jews. Now "hate" is a codeword for something else: Opposition to Zionism, a political program that many Jews find repugnant.

By equating "hate" with opposition to Zionism, organized Jewry has given everyone permission to be an anti-Semite.

In Soviet Russia, anti-Semitism was considered "counter revolutionary" and severely punished. Similarly, anti-Semitism is now a political crime in the West because it runs counter to the New World Order.

For example, a Winnipeg journalist, Leslie Hughes, was dropped as a Liberal candidate in the 2008 election for remarking on Israeli foreknowledge of the 9-11 attack in an 2003 article.  She was quoting an Israeli newspaper. She taught courses on tolerance and had no feelings of hostility against Jews whatsoever.  Her crime was political. (She is suing the Jewish groups.)

My writing warns Jews they have been used to advance the central banker's plan for world government dictatorship. I emphasize that every significant nation, religion and organization is being used in the same way. Nonetheless, the Canadian Jewish Congress accuses me of "hatred against Jews" and wants to suppress my writing on this subject.  The absurdity of accusing the son of holocaust survivors of anti-Semitism only underlines the true political nature of my crime.  


YOU ARE AN ANTI SEMITE IF ...

Rev. Ted Pike extrapolates from the 2004 US "Global Anti-Semitism Review Act"  to define the kind of political activity that is being criminalized. ("The Real Motive Behind
'Dept Of Global Anti-Semitism'")


1. Any assertion "that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world" is anti-Semitic.
 
2. "Strong anti-Israel sentiment" is anti-Semitic.
 
3. "Virulent criticism" of Israel's leaders, past or present, is anti-Semitic. 
 
4. Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature (especially the Talmud and Kabbalah) is anti-Semitic.
 
5. Criticism of the U.S. government and Congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish-Zionist community (including AIPAC) is anti-Semitic.
 
6. Criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism (the "New World Order") is anti-Semitic.
 
7. Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ is anti-Semitic.
 
8. Diminishing the "six million" figure of holocaust victims is anti-Semitic.
 
9. Calling Israel a "racist" state is anti-Semitic.
 
10. Asserting that a "Zionist Conspiracy" exists is anti-Semitic.
 
11. Claiming that Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia is anti-Semitic.
 
12. Making "derogatory statements about Jewish persons" is anti-Semitic.
 
13. Denying the right of mostly atheist Jews to re-occupy Palestine is anti-Semitic.
 
14. Alleging that Mossad was behind the 9/11 attack is anti-Semitic.


Essentially if you believe in truth and justice, you're an anti-Semite. If you believe in free speech, free inquiry and the democratic process, you're an anti-Semite. If you oppose tyranny, corruption and murder, you're an anti-Semite.

If you're not an anti-Semite, you're uninformed at best, and a sell-out ("vendu") at worst.  

Ultimately, the New World Order will turn 90% of the world's population and at least 50% of Jews into anti-Semites. Is this the real agenda? To divert blame away from the central banksters and their non-Jewish Masonic minions? 


THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN

 Andrew Hitchcock's "The Synagogue of Satan"  is a compelling chronology of the Jewish role in the central banker's Satanic conspiracy a.k.a The New World Order. Together with my Illuminati, it provides as an excellent introduction to the subject.

The.Synagogue.of.Satan.gifThe only knock is that Hitchcock does not provide references. For example, he lifts the above list from the Internet without giving  credit to Rev. Pike. Nevertheless Hitchcock's sources can be verified online.

I was impressed by the amount of new information and insight I found. Hitchcock explains how the "nationalization" of the Bank of England in 1946 was a sleight-of-hand. He provides new information on the art of money creation. He lucidly explains the significance of the Noahide Laws.

You read this book with growing fury at the scale of ruthlessness, criminality and chutzpah of certain Jews. These Jews are not God's Chosen people, but Satan's, a matter that should be of concern to the others who are guilty mostly of naivety, complacency, conformity, cowardice, opportunism and even some complicity. (The same can be said of Americans who support US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan with their tax dollars. Neither can hold their head up.)

Hitchcock quotes Werner Sombart who says that from 1820 onward, there was "only one power in Europe, and that is Rothschild."  He says modern capitalism and Americanism are nothing else but "the Jewish spirit distilled."  Certainly we must analyze the positive and negative aspects of this spirit, weighing material prosperity against spiritual, cultural and political bankruptcy. We must realize that modern Western civilization is essentially Cabalist (Masonic) and Jewish, and increasingly so.   


CONCLUSION

Does the New World Order represent the central banker's need to consolidate power? Is this culmination of a Jewish agenda, or a more general satanic agenda? I suggest that these three agendas are complementary and overlapping.

Our world is the product of a long-term Satanic conspiracy to overthrow Christian civilization and institute a veiled dictatorship using the mass media, education and sophisticated technology. All the scoundrels selling their fellow Americans down the river are put there by the central banking cartel, re. David Rockefeller, US franchisee.

In 1984 George Orwell predicted that reality would be turned upside down. Black would become white according to Big Brother diktat. Now that free speech is a political crime, Orwell's prophecy has come true.

We must resist the globalists with all our power. A people too stupid or weak to demand their freedom don't deserve to be free.

They bribe us with our own money now but eventually the bankers will demand payment in blood.     

--------

Naomi Klein Calls for Boycott of Israel 




Comments for "We're all Anti-Semites Now"

Tony said (June 27, 2009):

The term "antisemite" is a perfect example of Orwellian double think. As you mention in the start of your article, in the past everyone automatically, mostly subconsciously, translated this term into "prejudice against Jews." Why, then, was not the term used: "anti Jew?" If this is what is meant, why is it not what is stated? Those few people who realize the literal meaning of the term have to go through a correction of definition even to discuss it.

Plus, since Judaism is not truly religious, nor even racial (Paquita de Shishmareff described it to me as a cult worshiping Talmudic law religionized - which is obviously no longer current), but, again as you mention at times, more cultural, then semitism has nothing whatsoever to do with Judaism and is not a properly used term but a misnomer. I was invited once by a friend to "come over to the winning side" (to convert to Judaism) and I know I have no semitic blood.

So why is it so important to those running the show to use "anitsemitism" and not "anti Jew?" What is the onus of the term "anti Jew" we are not allowed to see? Does it have to do with keeping the "lowly" amheretz "shop keeping Jews" in line? Would they disown the "elitists" if they felt more directly vulnerable to suffering for those elitists' acts?


Dan said (June 27, 2009):

Evidently trial balloons have been going up for the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine, a defunct Federal Communications Commission rule that would require equal attention to both sides of controversial issues in broadcast editorial content.

I'm not sure I agree - the new book out this danger, "Shut Up America!" is probably a decoy. Because the FCC already had this and let it go.
You can't really shut up the public with 'equal time' That requires unilateral control of what can be said. "Hate speech" laws do this a lot better.

“The so-called 'Fairness Doctrine,' and what has been called 'Localism,' are unprecedented threats to our First Amendment rights. Brad O'Leary sounds the warning bell, and shows why every American - liberal and conservative - should stand against these thinly veiled censorship mandates.”

- G. Gordon Liddy
Nationally Syndicated Radio Host

http://www.endoffreespeech.com/reviews.cfm


Anthony said (June 27, 2009):

The king hit will be the TRUTH that Jews are non-Semitic and anti-Semitic according to the
Old and New Testaments of the Bible, the most eminent Jewish and other historians, Jewish
and other encyclopaedias. Why is it no one is prepared to inform the public of this
essential truth? By continuing the deception the self-styled Jewish leaders are stealing the
opportunity of redemption from Jews who are in Adam's race, because when the Gentile
dispensation ends one Nisan very soon, Jesus Messiah will turn to an election of blood
Israelites descended from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, not Israelis or Jews.


Pat said (June 27, 2009):

Hi Henry, just read you r article on Rense.com about everyone is an anti Semite. now. The understanding that I have is that about 1700 people are in need of being placed into humane institutional care to end the nuclear threat to the human race. Of this group 1500 are of Hebrew origin and the other 200 are mostly Royal Hanoverian Germans with another small mix of the planets dominant population.

This is from a message that I received from the High-level powers who are the ones who prevented the USS Liberty from sinking, and triggering World War III as was previously planned by the central bankers. The plan was called Frontlet 615 and was reported in the Peter Hounam book "Operation cyanide."

These 'kind' Beings desire that the human race survive and not be destroyed in an all out and unnecessary nuclear war.

Here is a sample of how 'Kind' is some of their thinking. When referring to the 1700 who are bent on moving forward and destroying the mass of humanity, they refer not to the people but rather the behavior of these human nuclear war fighting elite. They use the term "Animal primitivism," as in stuck on, in regard to their inability to select another strategy; a strategy that does not require that the mass of humanity be destroyed in an all out nuclear holocaust.

As there are about 6 billion of us, 1700 is a very small number of folks who need to institutionalized. When the "Living Dead" figure it out; these 1700 who spend all of their waking hours attempting to trigger a nuclear genocide, will be put away for good.

You may recall the 1968 movie "The night of the Living Dead?" In 1946 the decision was made by the central bankers to exterminate the mass of the human race with nuclear weapons. The nuclear trigger has been pulled on us several times since then. We only exist because of the continuing intervention into our world by these only slightly known High-level powers. I thank them everyday for us still being here. They, the High-level kind ones, are hoping that we can have a smooth transition into a Peaceful world. Bypass the counter aggression phase, and move right into the high tech everyone gets something, no imprisonment, and Peace is perfect world.

Keep writing

Best wishes


PS: The High-level powers have revealed to me that the "Centers of power" the term they use to describe the power elite,(Central bankers, Vatican, Royals) have known of their presence for many hundreds of years. The reason that the "Centers of power" have rejected any entrance into our world' by these High-level powers is because the human elite had already "Perfected the predator relationship upon humaniyt. many hundreds of years ago."


Barry said (June 26, 2009):

Yes indeed. As Joseph Sobran observed at the time Buckley canned him at Nat Review "at one time the term "anti-semite" meant someone who hates the Jews, but now it just means anyone the Jews hate" (even other Jews who dare to deviate from the agenda which the rich occultist Jews impose on the rest of the Jews & the world)


I will never forget that Sobran stated that at the time he was canned due to Zionist pressure on (S&B) Buckley, his Jewish friends stood by him while his "Christian" friends were in full flight. Presumably by "christian" he meant
shabbos goyim like Cal Thomas, Bill O'Reilly, Rush, and Hannity, et als.


Rebecca said (June 26, 2009):

Henry--I don't know where to begin. I guess I am an 'anti-semite' because I question the subservience of our great 'leaders' to the foreign state of israel? I guess I am an anti-semite because I question our 'great leaders' response the murder by Israel of Rachael Corrie and then compare it to the angst of our 'great leaders' to the shooting of a protester in Iran?

And I am not to notice that Israel commits genocide of Palestinians? I am not supposed to notice or mention for that matter, the evil done in Israel's name? And I am an anti-semite? I am not to believe that israel tried to sink the USS Liberty???


I still have not figured out if zionism is to be considered a religion or a race. This is always confused in the zionist controlled msm. They are a state and therefore a 'race' but then they are claiming they are a religion in other articles I read. So is anti-semitism against a religion or a people? It seems the slur is used wherever it will do the most 'good' for the zionists. So why aren't israel and the zionists being called 'anti'-Palestinian'? Or is that not on the radar? If it isn't then it just proves again that israel/zionism has control of our thoughts, speech and our life.

I just cannot ignore the depravity going on around us and not notice who is promoting it. I may as well admit it. In my thoughts, words and deeds, according to the list you posted, I am a raving anti-semite.

And do you know what? I am proud of that if it means not being a serf in this world. I believe in Truth and Justice--no matter the rant of those who would deny us that. An old saying--"if the shoe fits, wear it" should be given to the zionists. If you can't take the heat--quit causing fires!!!


Lynda said (June 26, 2009):

The internet is an entire smorgasboard of deep fried and fast food on this subject, but as usual your analysis gets to the meat and potatoes.

Yes I do think the real agenda of the 2004 U.S Global Anti Semitism Review Act is to define political crime. Thank you for revisiting Rev Ted Pike's excellent article on this subject and the link.

I think the real agenda of that Act is to divert the blame (for NWO atrocities) from the central banksters and their Illumined Masonry - JudeoMasonry and their Social Gentile Masonry.

Even though the Great Architects and their Masons are the perpetrators of outrages and sacriledges against God, cruelties and atrocities on a global scale, crimes against humanity and the earth, they are using the Jews as human shields.

This is not acceptable. Therefore, the spotlight must continue to shine directly on the Great Architects of the NWO themselves.

The crimes that are being defined in the Review Act 2004 display the subtlety and irony of the rabbinic mind.

For example, No 7 - it is AntiSemitic to "Blame Jewish leaders and followers for inciting the Roman Crucifixion of Jesus". And the Christians have traditionally tended to decpict the N.T. accounts in this way.

Jesus, himself and The Talmud do not depict it in this way. BT Sanhedrin 43a despises the idea of any shared responsibility. The Romans were mere agents and useful idiots according to this narrative, which details the execution of Jesus under halachic law.

So Christians may have to become more PC after all and change our narrative so that it is more in keeping with Jesus own statement to Pilate: "You could have no power over me at all unless it was given to you from above." From Heaven itself and then those who are elect powers in opposition, yet still carry out the will of Heaven - in hierarchical order: the Sanhedrin and under them the Roman civil authority and instrumentality.

Or as Caiphas is succinctly quoted in the N.T.: "It is expedient that one man should die for the sins of the people." The statement of Jesus recognizes that this very thought did occur in far more magnamimous terms to a greater mind than that of Caiphas; but Caiphas remark is a true statement as far as it goes and it does not come under the Global AntiSemitic Review Act.

Write on Henry,


Theresa said (June 26, 2009):

Well - you know I'm sure, they want / must be hated to stop the integration with non-Jews;
a Jew, very educated man (mother Jewish, father German aristocrat) told me that the Jews are most afraid of being loved.


Rob said (June 26, 2009):

Indeed we are. Forgot for a moment that the term Semite can barely apply to anyone in Israel, as it applies more to the Palestinians than anyone else, as THEY are the descendants of the Hebrew tribes we all think of when we talk of Judaism. They have managed to take a term, that for decades, maybe even over a century, was used to describe people who discriminate against Jews on the basis they are Jews, and turn it into a end all discussion killer.

According to the US government, the following criteria make you an anti-semite

Hatred of jews
Suspicious of jews
questioning Israel's actions
Condemning Israel's genocide against the people in Gaza
Questioning Israel's real or imagined part in 9.11
Believing in a world jewish conspiracy
Believing that Israel holds too much power in the US government
Believing that Israel has a clandestine, unannounced, nuclear weapons program
Believing in a Zionist conspiracy

There are pages and pages of this, but after the first two it turns to complete crap. So according to that criteria, I hate all Germans because of what the Nazis did. According to those points, asking questions of the motives of Israel's government makes me a racist anti-semite. Merely talking about the facts, that an Israeli spy ring was busted shortly before, and after 9.11 and was believed to be involved makes me an anti-semite, even though it's all documented facts.

Much like Leslie Hughes has been blacklisted because she stated FACTS that anyone can go read, from ISRAELI NEWS PAPERS.

It's pure insanity, we have allowed them to put ducttape over our mouths and ears.


Borris said (June 26, 2009):

Anti-semite must mean anti-asshole because so far when people out the assholes, they rush to call them anti-semite.

So a semite has been newly coined asshole in this New World Odor, which is appropriate because every time I hear one of these guys "speak" the foul stench of bullshit permeates the air.

I'll wager dollars to donuts that if you put their words to a video of a child in the throws of a tantrum, they would sync up perfectly.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at