Hemi said (September 25, 2011):

The comments that Ty makes [below] on this article are absolutely correct, backed up by an enormous amount of both archeological, paleontological, and scriptural evidence. The writer of this article, Abdulhakeem, has fallen for the multi-cultural lie being promoted by the Illuminati overlords, who are actively rewriting all of our history to obscure the true origins and cultural inheritance of the white european race.

To add to Ty's comments, it should be pointed out that by the time that Herodotus visited Egypt in the 5th Century B.C., Egypt was already in serious decline. The original white Egyptians, who had built the great civilization, had been largely absorbed into the native population through centuries of race mixing. By Herodotus' time, the average Egyptian had become multi-racial and probably looked much like the modern Egyptians do today.

Abdulhakeem is also mistaken about the Ethiopians. Yes, they are Black today--and they were in Herodutus' time, but again archeological evidence shows that originally ancient Ethiopia was settled and built by one of the ancient Israelite tribes who migrated down into the Horn of Africa from the Levant. Multi-cultural revisionists love to point out that Moses himself took an Ethiopian wife and therefore his descendants were Black. Nothing could be further from the truth. At the time of Moses, much of the Ethiopian ruling population was still Israelite, still white. And there is no doubt that like the Egyptians, the original Ethiopians were either absorbed into the arab/african population, or moved north into Egypt, and/or returned to the Levant.

The Talmud, of course, is one of the sources for multi-racial revisionism--as it is also the foundation for modern cultural Marxism, which has as one of its primary objectives the destruction of white european civilization and an obliteration of its history and people. Abdulhakeem is unwittingly promoting that very agenda.

Ed said (September 23, 2011):

he Sphinx has been proven to be older than dynastic Egypt by Robert M. Schoch, Ph. D., a geologist (not an Egyptologist), who showed that the erosion patterns on it were caused by large amounts of rain; Egypt/North Africa have not had a rainy climate since before historical records started, so the conclusion is obvious (though it isn't obvious to the orthodox Egyptological community, who continue to argue their untenable case that the Sphinx represents the pharaoh Chephren).

The head on the Sphinx was added at some time much later than the original construction, probably because the original head had badly eroded. This head is out of proportion to the body it is mounted on, being far too small. In spite of this head having been retrofitted, it is still older than pharaonic Egypt.

The head is not a representation of Chephren, as it has the appearance of an African Negro. Chephren was a Mediterranean-appearing white man; we have a statue of him, with his name on it in hieroglyphs. This means that African blacks have been in Egypt a very long time---this only makes sense, considering that the areas to the immediate south of Egypt along the Nile are and were inhabited by blacks.

Hassan (author) said (September 23, 2011):

I have a quote from Herodotus (the honest Greek), saying/indicating that the Ancient Egyptians were Black, his book "Book II of Herodotus 'Histories', which describes his visit to Egypt, will fill the bill:
Herodotus:
"As to the bird being black", he wrote, in discussing the origin of the oracles' of Ammon and Dodona, "they merely signify by this that the woman was
an Egyptain" .... Chronicle of Higher Education, May 6, 1992

On the origin of the Colchians (who lived near the Black Sea), he, Herodotus, said:
"My own idea on the subject was based first on the fact that they have black skins and wooly hair (not that that amounts to much, as other other
nations are the same), and more especially, on the fact that the Colchians, the Egyptians, and the Ethiopians are the only races which from ancient
times have practiced circumcision. The Phoenicians and the Syrians of Palestine themselves admit that they adopted it from the practice from Egypt...
Herodotus, Histories, p. 152

To show that the inhabitants of Colchis were of Egyptian origin and had to be a part of Sesostris' army; Herodotus says:
"The Egyptians said that they believed that the Colchians to be descended from the army of Sesostris. My own conjectures were founded, first, on the
fact that they are black-skinned and have woolly hair... "
The History of Herodotus, translated by George Rawlinson, New York: Tudor, 1928, p. 115

On several occasions Herodotus insists on the Negro character of the Egyptians and even uses this for indirect demonstrations. For example, to prove
that the Nile cannot be caused by melting snow, he cities, among other reasons he deems valid, the following observation:
"It is certain that the natives of the country are black with heat"
The History of Herodotus, translated by George Rawlinson, New York: Tudor, 1928, p. 88

On another occasion Herodotus writes distinguishing between the Padaeans and other Indians as follows;
"They all also have the same tint o skin, which approaches that of the Ethiopians"
Ibid., p. 184
Thus, Diodorus of Sicily writes:
"The Ethiopians say that the Egyptians are one of their colonies which was brought into Egypt by Osiris. They even allege that this was originally
under water, but that the Nile , dragging much mud as it flowed from Ethiopia, had finally filled it in and made it part of the continent...The add that
from them, as from their authors and ancestos, the Egyptians get most of their laws....."
Historie universelle, translated by Abbe Terrasson, Paris, 1758, Bk. 3, p. 34

It has reoccurred to me, as we go down this agenized bumpy road to obscure and deny the 'Nergo/Black' origin of Egypt and the birthrights of its descendants, that whatsoever Herodotus and other ancient historian eyewitnesses attest to regarding the 'Nergo/Black' origin of Egypt it will always be (starting from the 12th century until today) this incredulous controversy. How can it be otherwise? In light of the fact that our Luciferian social engineers:

have quite effectively engineered a mass hypnotic magical spell blinding our intuition, our connection with Oneness and Truth...
have quite effectively blocked our access to our Akashic records (our inherent cosmic self/The Soul)

Therefore, is it no wonder, that ones very eyes can see the massive Sphinx 'living stone testament' and still not see WHO the ancient Egyptians were??? But, rather insist on mythical origins of Egypy from the Atlantis fable to space-alien Egyptian origin.

Ty said (September 23, 2011):

Henry, the writer of this piece doesn't understand history. The Egyptians were white. Over a period of time, and toward the fall of Egypt, African blacks had made their way into the fold of Egyptian society from the south. This is why today you see a mixture of Arab, Black and white in their particular skin color.

Egyptians- white
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiMfXZyCe9w&feature=related

Egyptian DNA-Europeans
http://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts-dna-is-western-european/

In summary, the world has been experiencing a Jewish Marxist propaganda push targeting whites traditional and historically true racial and religious identity. We see this in the constant promotion of a false racial and religious history over that of the true history of whites.
.
The ancient Israelites were the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and mixed multitude (Egyptians) who made the Nation of Israel some 2800 years ago. After they went back to the "foreign God's" of Egypt and Sumaria they were expelled. They then inhabited an almost empty Europe through the Caucasus mountains.These Israel/Egypt DNA people then adopted Christianity as Christ made a way for physical Israel and physical Judah (mixed multitude among them) to come together again through his sacrifice. This is detailed among other places in the book of Hebrews.

Why do you think Europeans/whites have all these Egyptian and Israelite symbols in their architecture? Why do you think Christianity has ruled the Western European/white world for 2000 years? Why do you think the enemies of Christ are tricking whites back to the same foreign "Gods" worship; the very act that got them destroyed before?