Is Prince's Wedding Ring Refusal a Satanic Sign?

April 3, 2011

nm_will_kate_110110_mn.jpg


Satanists observe Christian rituals for one reason only, to tear them down. Everything a future king does is symbolic and an example to his people.



by Byron Molynieux

(for henrymakow.com)


Prince William will not wear a wedding ring to symbolize his marriage to Kate Middleton April 29. Explaining William's decision, a royal source told the Daily Mail, 'It is quite common for men in that strata of society not to wear a traditional wedding band.' 

A wedding ring symbolizes marriage, an institution that the Illuminati --"that strata of society" -- wish to destroy, along with the family. 

In breaking the rules of a Christian marriage ceremony and in light of the Satanism practiced by the Illuminati, we ask; Is William signaling his Satanism? He has done it before, notably by having a logo of Baphomet's head on his RAF uniform. (see below)

It would support the arguments of those who believe Prince William is the antiChrist. One women says he is Satan. Perhaps a ringless ring finger is an occult prerequisite. 

Other public figures who don't wear wedding rings have revealed themselves to be Satanists. Tony Blair doesn't wear one.(The Sarkozy's and Obamas do.)

In a recent article in the Guardian entitled, 'Yours for £150: Tony Blair's memoirs as gospel' we see Blair blaspheming by releasing a version of his autobiography in the style of the Bible.

pope-harper-family-cp-7016555-wide.jpg

Neither Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper nor his wife, ostensible Christians, wear a wedding ring. Here is a photo of Harper and his family meeting Pope Benedict XVI in the Vatican. His wife is dressed all in black with a hood, as if attending a black mass!

 

KATE'S SATANIC ENGAGEMENT RING


Despite refusing a ring, William has placed symbolic significance on the engagement ring given to Kate.

He has given her the same blue sapphire engagement ring his mother Diana had on her engagement. The blue sapphire is the gemstone of the planet Saturn. In The 13 Illuminati Bloodlines, Fritz Springmeier writes of Saturn:

Saturn is an important key to understanding the long heritage this conspiracy has back to antiquity. The city of Rome was originally known as Saturnia or City of Saturn. The Roman Catholic Church retains much of the Saturn worship in its ritual. Saturn also relates to Lucifer. In various occult dictionaries Saturn is associated with evil.

Dianas_engagement_ring-prince-william-kate-middleton_wedding-date.jpg

Sapphire is important in Satanic circles. 'Mauri' grew up in a Satanic family and suffered frequent sexual abuse as a child. She was conditioned with BETA Programming sex training and put to work in the child pornography industry. She notes that one Christmas, in between different sadistic tricks played on her, she received, 'a gold heart shaped necklace with a tiny blue sapphire stone. There was a matching bracelet.'

Grace Powers, of helpfreetheearth.com believes that the wedding date of April 29th also fits into the astrological clock of Saturn:

Prince William and Kate Middleton will be married while the planet Saturn is in Libra, just as William's parents Prince Charles and Princess Diana did. Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer wed on July 29, 1981. Thirty years later after one Saturn Return, their son, Prince William will marry Kate Middleton on April 29, 2011. This means that both royal couples will have the same Saturn/Venus influence in their marriage charts.

Unlike his parents, William's marriage chart has Saturn in retrograde. According to astrologers, this signifies a return to the past and explains the seemingly unending comparisons between the two couples and their weddings.

Given that Diana suffered a torturous marriage before being murdered by British Intelligence, Kate's being cosmologically aligned with her and presented her engagement ring is hardly a cause for celebration. Kate might worry. A wedding ring is a symbol of everlasting love and her fiancé won't wear one!

 

SATANIC HOLIDAYS APRIL 29TH

It is worth noting that the wedding date of 29th April is surrounded by Satanic holidays.

The 'Grand Climax' takes place between April 26-May 1 and is characterized by sexual interaction with female victims between the ages of 1-25. 'Walpurgisnacht Roodmas Day' takes place on April 30th and contains animal and/or human sacrifice of any age. 'Beltane Eve' also takes place on April 30th and is a fertility rite.

 

A Satanic holiday of special relevance to the Royal wedding is the 'Feast of the Beast'. According to Fritz Springmeier, it is a year-long event that occurs every 28 years and is attended by Illuminati leaders from around the world. It is a very high level ceremony, and would not be recognized at the anarchy ritual level of the Illuminati.

 The last two Feast of the Beast ceremonies occurred in 1954 and 1982, the last one was supposed to start in 2009 or 2010 meaning that it could still be going on and coincide with the royal wedding. Springmeier's description of the event resonates somewhat with a Royal wedding:

 

At the Feast of the Beast, a beautiful bride is trained and presented to Satan, and she may well be a virgin. This ceremony is most likely held at a castle or palace, and is also likely to be held over in Europe for the principle ceremony. Lesser ceremonies may be held here in the states. Witnesses claim that Satan appears and interacts with his human leadership. He provides them with detailed instructions for what he wants done until the next Feast of the Beast. In other words, he provides the top Illuminati hierarchy with their future long-range plans.

 

Given that our leaders are practicing Satanists, is it a coincidence that the Royal wedding is in the middle of a host of Satanic holidays?

 

CONCLUSION

 

We know that Royal weddings are generally loveless affairs, the participants marrying to keep wealth and royal genealogy in the family (William and Kate are 'kissing cousins'), but for William not to wear a wedding ring is a brash statement. Millions will tune in worldwide to see the Royal wedding and all will see William's heartless decision to refuse the universal symbol of marital commitment.

 The Satanic connotations have to be considered. The Illuminati do not marry out of love, or the joy of creating a loving family. They are predators who do deliberate evil to honor their dirty deity. 

The brutality of these arrangements can be found by researching the ritualistic murder of Princess Diana. The Illuminati exist in a cut-throat dog-eat-dog world.

 William's refusal to wear a ring is a sign of more horror to come.


---

William's Jewish Roots


Diana's ritualistic murder:

Here

Here                      and here


----

baphomet.jpg











Comments for "Is Prince's Wedding Ring Refusal a Satanic Sign?"

Mark said (April 10, 2011):

Regarding April 29th wedding date. Amazingly, what doesn't get much mention is that this is the date that Hitler and Eva Braun married. I doubt that it is completely coincidental.


Krister said (April 4, 2011):

An 6 part interview on YouTube by www.redicecreations.com of the author of the book "Hitler Was a British Agent", elaborates on how statesmen such as Hitler and others, are controlled by shame and blackmail (ie. sex deviation and serious crime as phedofilia and murder). The part of interest related to this article start in part 3, where the author Greg Hallett describes the 20 Century as a Rothschild family operation and thereafter describes how the English royalty is related to-, and controlled by, the nowdays notorious banking family. Later on in part 4 at 8 min. and in beginning of part 5, he further comment on the British Royal family.

Hitler Was a British Agent part 1 of 6:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&v=frf9GS0g9YM


Ken said (April 4, 2011):

nteresting observations concerning William and wedding/engagement rings. I would like to point out that not wearing these rings does not "[break] the rules of a Christian marriage ceremony" , according to Jesus Christ. There is nothing in His Word about His people using such things. The "Christians", as is too often the case, baptized and adopted a pagan practice and incorporated it into their own. After long usage, such "traditions" become thought of as 'Christian', when, in reality, they're nothing of the kind. Ingrained habits do not legitimize a thing if it's false to begin with--no matter how much time has passed.

As far as any intended message from "the powers that be" to the public, well, that could easily be true. The fact that rings are not actually Christian may not negate the potential desired effect of rejecting it, so long as the general public believes it is a real Christian institution.


SG said (April 4, 2011):

Soon after Diana's death, I saw a marked change in Prince William. He began life appearing like a sweet, warm and bright child. I recall he did not walk alongside his father at her funeral. He looked completely destroyed that day. Over the years since, his appearance became darker. One might imagine that his programming began in earnest at that point. I suppose they would not allow him to marry unless and until his possession was complete. The person posing for photos these days bears very little resemblance to the golden boy he once seemed to be.


Karin said (April 4, 2011):

I would like to make a comment about the emblem on prince William's uniform and I agree with the fellow talking about this mountain goat from the Kyper path area. In actuality it looks like an Antelope to me and being in the goat family has resemblance to Bephamot, but is not one and the same.

And who knows, maybe Kate will find a lovely, masculine ring she wishes to present him with perhaps at a later date at one of their anniversaries, and out of sheer love and respect for her he will choose to wear it just to please her.
Let's wait and see. It is my sincerest desire some place along the way William will show more of his mothers personality and character
and choose to follow truth, light, and life. For this to happen people all across the world would need to get in unity and pray for this young man to come out of darkness and onto the path of Righteousness ( or right living). He would then begin to encounter the same opposition and persecution his mother encountered. I identified with her pain and disappointment she initially experienced as was caused by this scumball Charles ( he is no prince in my book ), which left her no choice but to go on in life in her search for the inner peace, happiness, and fulfillment most young woman desire when they start a young family as she did.


Kate said (April 4, 2011):

GREAT ARTICLE! I'm so disappointed to find that Prince William has gone over to the dark side but I am not surprised.

I guess it was either that or die. There is no negotiating with these imposters impersonating humans.

Your readers who disagree are just too brainwashed by all the satanism worldwide to know the difference.

Thank you for having the courage to call things are they truly are! The more people wake up the more of a chance we have in saving mankind.

First step? Get rid of all the despotic satanic families who falsely believe they are "god" and therefore have the right to rule over the rest of mankind! Almighty God made each man and woman a sovereign citizen of the earth.

HE and HE ALONE is qualified to "rule" the earth. Anyone who says otherwise is either working for the Beast or is sadly deeply brainwashed by It.

Keep up the Good Work!!


Christine said (April 4, 2011):

Hi Henry,

Speaking of masochists, what about Kate Middleton, that poor girl who wants to marry a guy who refuses to wear a wedding ring? And is letting his family shun hers on holidays? Sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.

On the other hand, St. Thomas Aquinas said that the daughters of unchastity include selfishness, hatred of God, darkening of the intellect, and so on. Pehapd if Prince William and Kate led chaste lives, which they are not, they might use better judgement.

St. Edmund Campion said that England would become corrupt as a result of its rejection of the Catholic religion. The Saint was a friend of Queen Elizabeth I, who had him racked. Immediately after his famous remark, he was partially hanged, disemboweled, and hacked into 4 pieces.

His crime? Offering the Sacraments as a Catholic priest.

After seeing the Prince's refusal to wear the ring, and his spinelessly standing by to let his family mistreat hers, I can see that the Saint was right.


Anthony said (April 4, 2011):

I have to agree with James. Stefan Molynieuxon's essay "Is William's Wedding Ring Refusal Satanic?" reeks of ignorance. There are already many signs that point to future monarch's involvement in anti-Christian activity. The lack of a wedding ring is not one of them.

Many cultures... Jewish, Muslim, some Christian (Seventh-day Adventists) have traditions of bride and or groom not wearing wedding rings. A biblical study in jewelry shows that the giving of jewelry suggests ownership, i.e. an earring given to slaves (Ex.21:2-6, Deut.15:16-17). It can also symbolize a special provider/receiver relationship, i.e. the prodigal son's reward includes a ring (Luke 15:22). Christ gives a crown to those who look forward to his appearing (2 Tim 4:8).

Is it expected that a young woman is supposed to save for and produce a ring of gold for her husband on their wedding day? Or is the young man who already spent at least a month's salary for an engagement and wedding ring expected to spend another thousand or so for a ring for himself? The western tradition of men wearing wedding rings is less than one hundred and fifty years old, gaining influence in America following the world wars and perpetuated commercial enterprises like De Beers.

A man who refuses to wear a wedding ring can hardly be less of a family man than a man who does wear one, much less a satanist. Much more a man who gives his bride a ring and leaves his hand naked is a man who subscribes to a rich tradition of the provider/receiver relationship. In fact, some may view those men who do where wedding rings as uneducated and effeminized.

No, William's refusal to wear a ring is not a sign of satanic involvement. It distinguishes him from all the effeminized Christian men who would rather be "partners" with their wives then leaders and providers in their marriage.

--

Anthony,

Everything the Illuminutty do is symbolic. Every thing a future king does is symbolic. You are mistaken in this instance.

Henry


NEM said (April 4, 2011):

irst of all Henry I'm no fan of the Royal Family or the British establishment but I feel I must present a few facts in response to your article.

RAF 60 Squadron currently is a helicopter flying school. Prince William was wearing that uniform whilst training there. He is now a fully qualified search and rescue helicopter pilot, flying Sea King helicopters.

The emblem is a markhor's head a mountain goat and was approved by King George VI in December 1937 to commemorate years of service in North West India. The makhor is found there in the Khyber Pass. They are also said to have the ability to eat snakes!

Like I said I'm no lover of the Royal Family but sometimes I feel you go way over the top with your Satanist bloodline beliefs.

--

NEM

Yeah there always is an explanation for their satanic symbols, and there's always someone like you who provides it.

Like Egyptians, the Illuminati depend on 'da Nile."

henry


Jeb said (April 4, 2011):

HE IS NOT MATURE ENOUGH TO SETTLE DOWN
...the ring symbolizes castration to a playboy party sort...which he is and then some.

Their wedding 'bliss' won't last a year.

I don't see anything necessarily 'dark' about his hormone and identity issues.
He's just a punk who THINKS he wants to be married. Won't last...I guarantee it.


James said (April 3, 2011):

I just read your article on the fact that Prince William won't wear a wedding ring. I understand the point you're making in your article, but focusing on that point is well off the mark. There are many cultures that don't wear wedding rings. Practicing Muslims, for instance, don't wear wedding rings as it's not part of Muslim custom (from what I've read). Are you suggesting therefore that they too are Satanists? If so, you really are crossing a line here.

Isn't this article just another examples of you pouncing on something that catches your attention and crying 'Satanism!'? The fact that the Royal Wedding takes place amidst a whole range of Satanist holidays is an important topic in itself, and had you chosen to focus on that, your article would have been much more effective. As it is, pouncing on the absence of a wedding ring - which, let me repeat, isn't even acknowledged in several cultures - just makes you, and anyone else who makes an issue out of this, look very stupid and petty.

--

No James,

This is another example of your denial and complicity in our societal death wish.
Other cultures don't wear a ring? That's just the point. We're trying to preserve our own. He will be king! How do you explain the Baphomet on his uniform? Do other armies salute Satan as well?

Henry



Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at