Manu said (March 15, 2010):

This a clear case of problem, reaction, solution. The jewish left wing agenteurs create the grounds for massive immigration to occur ( especially Muslim). Then they give the Muslim immigrants social advantages and keep the citizens from complaining though political correctness social oppression( with the help of the media). When things are ready to explode they introduce the anti Muslim pro Israel lackey to bring Europe closer to the Israeli agenda, of course later on asking for support and financing will be much easier for the Zionists.

SS said (March 15, 2010):

I've been visiting and working in Holland for 18 of the last 25 years and have seen the progression from exceeding tolerance to " enough-is-enough" intolerance..politically when it comes to all sorts of things..most especially immigration.

And by that I mean largely Muslim immigration.

Frankly..no one here is upset with "immigration" per se'' ..not even Wilders.

The problem is NON integration..and the extremely high crime rate among muslim youth...the spate of honor killings, gang-rapes, and death to the infidel rallies we've all been made aware of..non-stop, from the local media here for about a decade.

This coupled with a lot of fathers kidnapping children and taking them back to arab lands,
the fact that 2nd and 3rd generations of immigrants here STILL cannot or will not speak Dutch...

and the blatant attempts and loudly stated ambitions of muslim radicals to use "democracy" to
introduce Sharia law here...well...like I said, even the tolerant Dutch are screaming enough is enough!

They are angry..and not just with the situation, but with the established parties who have been aggravating the situation by ignoring it, or using patronizing, tch-tch tactics to play down the seriousness, not just of the complaints
but the complainers.

And of all the parties here..of all the leaders, at least Wilders is willing to say in public and in the " tweede kamer" and on TV, what a great many Dutch are thinking....no matter how NON-PC it is to say it.

In short..the average Dutch person believes that one should not come here, asking for asylum, or seeking citizenship if they do not agree with and support Dutch existing cultural norms..like equality for women..starting with their own.

If their country was so bad that they wanted to come here to get away from it..well, the Dutch say welcome. IF, however, once you get here you still want to think, act, dress, speak and behave the way you did in the old country, replace our cultural norms with yours.....well...then Go Back to the Old Country..[and take your relatives with you!]

Now..when it comes to these hot-button issues like head-scarves. I say let the women wear scarves if they want to..

that is nothing to get upset about...BUT..Burqa's and Nigabs?......not in schools..public buildings, court-houses not anyplace but the stage or in a mosque or an arab embassy...not here in Holland.

Think that is unfair? If I would travel to Mecca or Bahrain or Yemen or Rabat will I not also encounter a different culture
and different laws I must obey as a GUEST or resident in that land?

They tell women to cover themselves in those countries..segregate them..ban them from driving ..alcohol is a no-no, kissing in public gets you a jail sentence and a caning....and it is not uncommon to see brides as young as 13 and 14.

If you complain you get deported or detained,,or worse..and that is THEIR right since it is their country.

No one seems to have an issue with it.

So why is it wrong for the Dutch to feel the same way....? If you don't respect our customs, Dutch values, Dutch laws Dutch culture then don't expect the Dutch to remain forever " tolerant". Patience has its end..and the Dutch are absolutely at the end of their patience.

Even the much-esteemed Job Cohen, [the great " left" hope of Dutch mainstream politics and new PvdA leader] is known for being pragmatic
and " right-wing" when it comes to tackling the evident problems of NON-integration by immigrants...and showing a willingness to at least
hear the complaints of the voters who don't want Wilders, but don't want wahabi-schooled imams preaching Sharia on the streets of Amsterdam
and Rotterdam either.

The only saving grace of late..one that might have an effect and help assuage the barely containable socio-ethnic-religious riot that many see here as inevitable as the local economy continues to sour..is the new Fatwah against terrorism being touted as the Muslim scholars attempt to take break the jihadist fever gripping much of the muslim youth this last 20 years.

But that's just it...it has taken decades to get anything like a proper, theological condemnation from any Muslim Imam of stature..why so long and why so few? And why are we not allowed to be historically critical of the Prophet, and/or his personal life...Why is it off-limits to critique Mohammed as we do Jesus or Buddha or the Pope?

These are issues talked about around the kitchen tables of Dutch families and it is about time someone in Den Haag started speaking in the same terms ON camera and in parliament about the same issues and fears that everyone else in Holland...especially the native "Christian" are speaking about and blogging about.

As for zionism...stop with labels and isms already.....Wilders is first and foremost pro-Dutch..not pro-Israel [as is evidenced by his refusal to support NWO policies in Afghanistan
...and as far as I can tell he is not a racist...at least not in the classic sense..He IS anti-Islam, anti-Shariah, and anti-non-integration.

And he is very likely going to be premiere or vice-premier of Holland come this time next year.

Chris said (March 15, 2010):

It's a long story but the Far-Eastern British Empire expanded under the British East India Company initially, which was modeled on the VOC
(Dutch East India Company); a company mentioned by Mannaseh ben Israel in his letter to Cromwell; this company had many Jewish investors and
the way the VOC did business in the Dutch East Indies (currently called Indonesia) is in some sense a reflection of the values and
business acumen of these so called Zionists.

It was convenient for them to secure Islam there in muted form; the full support of Islam
and the races from Indonesia who were brought to Malaya and nativized there as natives with special rights over others was pioneered by the
British; the intentions were many, but probably related to using them to control the other more ancient groups from India and China and
elsewhere who brought in most of the money and labor for the Empire; another reason was the psychology and work ethic that this strain of
Islam had was conducive to British patronage and subjugation, in addition to the divide and rule standard operations.

So in Holland and Europe in general, Islam is covertly reviled, but here in these
parts jealously protected and upheld by the same influential forces.

The conclusion I seem to make is that one is dealing with a bunch of elite ragamuffins who do not operate on the basis of principles and
law guaranteed to all through an advanced civilization, but on arbitrary arrangements designed to bring in the bacon. That so much of
the world can fall for such street-urchins may imply that most of us who have succumbed have done so because we worship the god of the
belly.

Ralph said (March 15, 2010):

Yes, it's absolutely clear Wilders is a Zionist and Muslim basher, but what else is new? To these so called illuminati, that are put in positions of power by their "great master", the whole world is one giant chess game, so Wilders is a just another pawn.

We are being played off against each other over and over again. While i'm writing this, the Dutch news in the background reports about fake news broadcast in Georgia, about a second invasion of the Russians, people panicking in the streets....I mean, everything is a giant HOAX! People are being treated like cattle. Unbelievable.