Michael from SA said (May 6, 2012):

Hi Henry, I hope all is well. I found your article about Nelson
Mandela interesting. To me it confirms suspicions I've had for some time and rumours and stories I heard from ex-soldiers (pre 1994) and a friend of my late dad's who used to design rockets and other weaponry for the old SA government pre 1994.

It's sad that apartheid has to be blamed for everything, the current government blames it for any problems; from failing infrastructure to unemployment, to the now
discredited and preposterous South-African National defence force.

Nelson Mandela is certainly no hero, or icon, or god as he is hailed internationally; just a pawn. Personally I do not condone apartheid; and I wish this hatred would stop, that the government would stop blaming "whites" and "the west" for their problems and shortcomings. I feel that BEE and affirmative action is unfair; I wasn't there when Verwoerd implemented Apartheid, and I was born in 1988, I remember nothing of apartheid, or racial injustice.

Anyway, have you heard of Seer van Rensburg(1860-1926)? He prophesied Nelson Mandela's reign, his tie with communism and other future events including but not limited to: World war 3 ( including it's causes and progression), ethnical violence in Russia and europe because of immigration, the total annihilation of England, bankruptcy for England and France,
civil war and ethnic cleansing in South-Africa after the death of a
prominent leader etc. Some of his prophesies that have already been fulfilled: Chernobyl disaster, princess Diana's death (and that she had to die because she brought shame on the royal family, that SA will be governed by a black government etc. This guy's prophecies seem to be dead on accurate, many have been fulfilled; he is very controversial in SA at the moment, and the mention of him is kind of "forbidden" in current government and in the media.

When I read his stuff, I see it unfolding before my eyes, very strange and interesting too, see his prophecies at
http://heavenawaits.wordpress.com/siener-van-rensburg-visions-of-the-future

Ashley said (May 5, 2012):

I am most grateful that Michael Hoffman’s article gave you a start for your own article of May 3rd on South Africa. Gary Allen, in his lecture tour of SA in 1976, showed us the two UN reports in which they had debated (around 1969) military invasion as a means of taking over our country, concluding in both that (at that time) it would not have been cost-effective to do so: they expected an adequate military response to their intended aggression.

Rather, it proved so much easier to subvert sitting politicians (who then underwent ‘miraculous’ conversions from conservative to ultra-liberal) into making a staged handover of the state to the Communist functionaries that both Britain and America had set up as a fake opposition to the existing government (we learned decades ago, e.g., that the Pan Africanist Congress had been set up in the US Information Office in Johannesburg in 1955).

Here we have a standard British propaganda/insurrection ploy: i) demonize the government presently in power; ii) set up the aforementioned opposition to remove the ‘wicked’ incumbents; iii) support the opposition materially, in the media, and by pronouncements from your own foreign ministry; iv) launch the ‘armed struggle’/‘democratic uprising’/‘war of liberation’ that targets mostly defenceless citizens, who then implore the government to surrender to the ‘freedom fighters’ for the sake of peace.

Parts of this scheme were used to destroy the Boers in the Anglo-Boer War (1899-1902), and all four were employed in putting the ANC into power in 1994. Similar ploys were used in the recent overthrow of Libya, and are obviously being used effectively in Syria at present, the only adjunct being that overwhelming NATO intrusion has become their means of choice in concluding the ‘war of liberation’ (to the satisfaction of no-one but the hidden aggressors, of course).

God bless you for your dedication to the truth, Henry.

Mark said (May 5, 2012):

I don't mean to sound like I'm splitting hairs here, but I think this is an important distinction in qualifying your statement somewhat that you made in your article, 'When Is Terrorism Not Terrorism?', that "Terrorism is not terrorism when the Illuminati banking cartel is behind it."; by saying that terrorism is not terrorism when committed by a group -- usually by another one of the banking cartel's own frontgroups -- the thesis -- , which advances its own interests at a particular point in time. The Cabalist banking cartel was also behind the terrorism of the acting Aparthide government in power at the time -- the opposing dialectical antithesis on the chessboard.

The false-flag attacks of 911, 7/7, Madrid train bombings, Bali, the Mariot Hotel and Australian Embassy bombings in Java, the Underwear dud bombing ect., which were all publically declaired as terrorism, were all carried out by the central banking cartel through its intelligence agencies control-arms to be blamed on another one of its dialectical front-groups, Al Qaeda, which wasn't even directly involved (didn't even board the planes), except as intelligence assets, acting as decoy-patsy-roleplayers, as a pretext to invade and occupy "Al Qaeda-occupied countries", plunder their resources and set up police states in Western democracies, on the way to a global police state. So, ultimately the International Money Power (controlled by powers far above it) is behind all the terrorism -- even if only provocatured -- , even the terrorism they themselves call terrorism, even as the sides designated as "terrorists" keep changing in fickle, Orwellian fashion.

S said (May 4, 2012):

By identifying the usual players in this scenario, it is little surprise to learn that Communism rules in SA today. Blacks take, rape and kill 'according to need' from those seen with 'the ability to provide'. And the Jew riddled Western Media sing 'silent night'. A neighbour told me that SA was originally settled by whites of his tribe and as we know that SA was considered for 'the Jewish Homeland' the fact that Palestine was chosen, does not mean that SA was off the hook. Israel may be the outer manifestation made visible, whereas SA is the dark hidden counterpart playing out our future under Yiddish Rule.

Mohammed said (May 4, 2012):

Why did the ANC kick Julius Malema out?
Why did the media expose Jujus shady personal finances?

Malema was quite correct when he asked why it was only him that was being investigated/exposed. why not other politicians who have lots more than Juju to hide?

Because it was only Malema who was making lots of noise about nationalizing the mines. We know that the ANC's bosses control the mines & the media and they were(&still are) afraid that if the gullible black majority in SA take Malemas cries about nationalization to heart, then it would mean lots of trouble for
them.

and [the bankers] are not worried about the economy or jobs or anything of that sort-they are only worried about themselves
the billions they have stolen so far is not enough and they dont want to leave South Africa while theres still billions more to be made.

therefore they got the ANC to punish him also, it serves as a lesson to thers who may decide to push nationalization of
the mines Comrade or not- see what will happen to you!

and Henry-dont worry about Ernest
he is either a Zionist Jew or still has much to learn about what is really going on.

Philip in SA said (May 4, 2012):

Ernest [below]is blowing his cover! I think he is benefiting from the current regime, as it is instant reaction to label anything "Racist" if the ANC is criticized in any way. Think of the recent reactions of the ex ANC Youth League President, Julius Malema.

Thankfully he has overstepped the line and TPTB have expelled him from the Party. But you have hit a raw nerve by exposing the truth. Since I became aware of the Zionest Cabal ruling the world soon after 9/11, I was convinced that the ANC are only puppets to the SA Jewish Board of Deputies. The Status Quo between rich and poor has not changed very much, except that there are many more poor whites now who live in shanty towns.

BTW, Judge Goldstone was banned from attending his grandson's Bar Mitzvah at the Great Shul in Johannesburg after he released his scathing UN Report on Israel. He was only forgiven when he retracted his involvement and sentiments of the Report.

Keep up the good work of exposing the 'badies'.

Paul in SA said (May 4, 2012):

Ernie is missing the point, The issue here is who is behind the sufferings of the people. The South Africans both black and white are well aware that the banksters are behind what is going in SA, the escalating of food,fuel prices.

I agree with you we were duped to believe that ANC is the peoples movement, how can the ANC introduces e - tolling road system on an ailing economy, now the banksters are using the minister of finance of SA to lobby BRICS to raise R100 billion for IMF.

ANC has betrayed South Africans more especially us blacks. Ernest has to come and see for himself how rural communities are suffering. The unemployment has soared but that is what the communism stand for to make people the beggars of the state.

Ron said (May 4, 2012):

Ernest. Nelson Mandela admitted to terrorism & acts of sabotage publicly & in print so your odd denial is a moot point. Furthermore Mandela was exposed an an MI6 agent by fellow MI6 agent Stephen Dorril [ http://www.newsmakingnews.com/mandela3,21,00.htm ]

in his 2000 book. President F W de Klerk [ who made the handover to the controlled ANC ] was also exposed as a British Intelligence agent put into power specifically for that role. There is no way that the current regime was ever about "liberation" as that was simply a convenient cover for which the Oppenheimer & financial elite used to continue their pillaging of the resources of the region.

The South African situation is a very complex one because a portion of the local White population were Boers [ who are also a minority within the White Afrikaans speaking population ] who were also Colonized & dispossessed of their land - the British conquered the Boer Republics during the second Anglo-Boer War wherein 50 % of the Boer child population were killed within the concentration camps that the British set up against Boer civilians.

The Boer people are an indigenous / homegrown people who were formed on the Cape frontier ie: on the frontiers of white settlement and on the outskirts of civilization [ as noted by author Brian Du Toit ] AWAY from the Cape Dutch who would later be called Afrikaners. The Boers were arbitrarily made part of the macro White population despite their partial Indian / Malay & Khoisan roots as part of a British strategy to co-opt them within White society & government.

Susan said (May 3, 2012):

thanks for another great article henry. we were all duped by mandela, none more so than the poor innocent blacks who thought that he was actually there to help them, not ruin them even further. south africa is a land that holds many resources that can be made into 'stuff' for the useless consumers among us, never mind about the millions of faceless souls that happen to be born and live there. i also don't know what Ernest was on about? your article didn't seem racist at all to me.

-

Thanks Susan

Ernest thinks I'm racist because I identified the ANC as terrorists.

henry

Ernest said (May 3, 2012):

When Terrorism is not terrorism

I do read your site from time to time.. never realized you were a racist , or very little informed.

On South Africa, One fighting for their own right whether you think its Zionism or not, is acceptable. do not compare with the palestines.

If the blacks are poor, so be it, its their land you have no right to say what standard of living they should have.. better die a free man. So you are ok with white minority rule in a foreign land, give me a break henry. Its because of the black freedom, thats why there is poverty, aids, and so on.. whites would rather come in as the cure for all.

you just lost a reader, your views are racist, an invaded country has the right to do what it has to do..unless like the red indians have 60m yes 60m wiped out by foreign white invaders..

good day

--

Ernest

Good riddance. You obviously missed the point. The ANC did not represent the Black people. It represents the bankers.

It would have been better to divide the country into White and Black portions.

henry