David said (October 17, 2024):

I wish to contradict the statement "There was no mention of the "Holocaust" before 1972." I was aware of the narrative in the 60's. when i lived in Munich During that time, the story included, Lampshades, mattresses, and soap, which we believed, but all of which have been debunked. Irving's work gives me something to think about.

Thomas S said (September 22, 2017):

I believe the idea that large numbers of Jews were gassed is complete fiction. To have murdered so many people in that way would have required premises on a much larger scale than the ramshackle rooms we have been shown - even if those were indeed effective. I don't doubt that numerous Jews tragically died from disease, starvation and exposure in the Nazi prison camps. But I think the three million or six millions figures are simply guesswork - where are all the bodies for one thing?

--

Thanks Thomas

Curious that the only response has come from holocaust deniers. As I said, the truth which I think Irving is closest to, pleases no one.

henry

Neil said (September 22, 2017):

While David Irving may be a brilliant historian he is not a holocaust revisionist. In fact Irving, when it comes to the holocaust, is a fraud and has been exposed as such by Al Baron who was one of the best revisionists I have come across.

Baron, after one encounter with Irving, exposed him as a lover of rent boys and handed the evidence to people working for the late Greville Jenner, a top Zionist in the UK who at the time had not yet been exposed as a paedophile, Baron was shown some incriminating photos of Irving and was told to forget the rent boy stuff as Irving was working for them.

In his legal fight with Lipstadt Irving took a dive. Many revisionists followed the trial and were surprised not by what he said but what he did not say.

Irving could have destroyed Lipstadt with available evidence but decided to stay shtum on many aspects of the so called holocaust.

When it comes to the holocaust Irving is not to be trusted.

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/NetLoss/Irving/Irving-ExposingIrving.html

Pedro said (September 22, 2017):

great video of Irving, I must read/reread more of his books, though he doesnt seem to get it that Hitler was a British agent -which is why he was nice to Jews and British. - see MilesWMathis.com for his new one on Benito Mussolini, and his Jewish 30 yr girlfriend and him being a british agent too. not sure about Stalin at this stage, except he was also part Jewish and probably as Kaganovich, an actor in the 1911 sydney street riots, starring Churchill strutting around on silent film exactly like that businessman in the Beatles rooftop propaganda piece.

Mario said (September 21, 2017):

Is hard to believe in gas chamber. Why to kill with gas when you can kill by hungry ( great quantity of people, millions if neccesary) in 80 days or by thirst in just 8 days). Just avoid supply of water for 8 or 10 days. To made this in concentration camp is more easy that Stalin Kaganovich do in Ucrania with Ukranian population.

If it was an extermination plan why there are so many survivors??

Luis said (September 21, 2017):

Gas chambers did not exist. I got a quote at home of the guy who invented that lie. What existed were rooms where new prisionrers would be sprayed for typhus.
2 million? No chance; Red Cross International stated that not even three hundred thousand jews died, and none in gas chambers.

David C (2) said (September 20, 2017):

I should not have specifically stated it was "diesel" engines that were used, since they apparently used gas vans for the most part - that was erroneous, so thanks for correcting me. However, diesel fumes CAN kill, especially in the confined space of an enclosed room, (or truck/van) full of people. In some cases the Nazis apparently used refined carbon monoxide gas in larger gas chambers, which could have come from either type of engine. The use of Zyklon-B for murdering people is problematic though, as the gas chambers used in the USA to kill just one person at a time proved, and I've seen no convincing evidence cyanide gas was used to kill people. Zyklon-B was available though, so it was likely was used at least a few times, and possibly on a larger scale. Supposedly the Nazis demolished the real gas chambers with explosives, which makes sense. As someone with a Jewish mother, I've been researching the "Holocaust" and "Zionism" for many years, trying to understand what really happened. I've concluded that both sides are exaggerating, Holocaust deniers and Holocaust believers, because that's the tactic they use presently to get the two sides fighting with each other. The reason I stated "diesel engines" were used, was that I had just read this at a Holocaust website:

Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka

In 1942, systematic mass killing in stationary gas chambers (with carbon monoxide gas generated by diesel engines) began at Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka, all in Poland. As victims were "unloaded" from cattle cars, they were told that they had to be disinfected in "showers." The Nazi and Ukrainian guards sometimes shouted at and beat the victims, who were ordered to enter the "showers" with raised arms to allow as many people as possible to fit into the gas chambers. The tighter the gas chambers were packed, the faster the victims suffocated.

Kurt B said (September 20, 2017):

David C.’s contention that the Germans used “carbon monoxide from diesel engines” to kill people is untenable. Diesel exhaust is oxygen rich and would be terribly inefficient as a lethal agent.

Also, since there were no crematoria at any of the Operation Reinhard camps, disposal of the remains is problematic. The contemporary narrative is that the Germans first buried the corpses in massive pits then later dug them up and burned them. However, in the 1990’s an Australian team using ground penetrating radar examined several of the sites and found no evidence that the soil had been disrupted anywhere.

I can believe that the SS rounded up and shot many partisans toward the end of the war but to claim that there was a central plan of extermination fails to convince. 70 years after the end of the war there is no evidence of a plan, budget, disbursement records or blueprint of a homicidal gas chamber. We are supposed to believe it was all done with a wink and a wave.
I’ve read Irving and like his books although he seems too often contradict himself on the holocaust story.

Insider said (October 16, 2024):

"In the past, I have presented evidence that Martin Bormann, the man who signed Hitler's pay check, was a Soviet i.e. Illuminati agent; but I was not sure if Hitler was also a conscious traitor."

{ Let me help you on this one, 99% of Anyone in office is bought and paid for Traitors, NO Matter what they say to the public !!!!! }

KB said (May 18, 2022):

I don’t doubt that Bormann was a traitor, but I believe it was Canaris that gave the allies the Enigma codes. Hitler may have been a fanatical nationalist and a reckless gambler, but he was not a traitor.

D said (May 17, 2022):

Great article. I agree with your conclusions that Hitler was a Rothschild agent (and probable Rothschild by birth) and built Germany up to ultimately deal it a crushing and unrecoverable defeat while criminalizing any nationalistic sentiment in the European Union that would emerge.

In my opinion, Trump did the same thing with make america great again, building us up with a euphoric high to ultimately preside over America's destruction during the "covid" war, and demonizing the america first nationalist movement for the new world order.

So when the libs all cried that Trump was Hitler, they were totally right, but for the wrong reasons!

AA said (July 15, 2019):

Exactly my viewpoint which nobody wants to consider, yet the most important ww2 investigation that will change everything. Thanks for your tireless work to investigate, educate, and hopefully correct history someday.

Brian said (March 17, 2017):

"the fact that Hitler shielded Bormann confirms that he also was an active traitor"

First of all, you cannot prove that Hitler's actions constituted a "shielding" of Bormann. You could just as easily conclude that for Hitler to forbid any intervention by Abwehr upon his being informed of fake radio messages that he APPROVED simply shows the level of deceit perpetrated on him by the Bormann group.

Your logic is seriously flawed by the lack of any empirical evidence PROVING Hitler's complicity

--

Thanks Brian

Everyone needs to believe iin something.

henry

Brendon O'Connell said (March 17, 2017):

I have to disagree strongly.

Ghelen was writing after the war. He had no idea about the Ultra Intercepts, Enigma. He was right to be suspicious of Bormann. Ultra was giving Stalin the entire German order of battle. Bormann hung around Hitler like a bad smell, keeping people away. Indulging Hitler's fantasies of winning the war in his methamphetamine intoxication, administered by Dr Morrel. It makes sense he would be suspicious of Bormann.

Wilhelm Canaris has more credentials as a traitor.

Ultra lost Germany the war. Even knowing the entire German order of battle - times they would strike, where and when - the Soviets still barely hung on.

Hitler was a brilliant armature tactician. The Soviets had 30,000 armoured vehicles on or near the border. Stalin was set on a June 1942 invasion of Western Europe. Hitler, with great daring and great risk, almost pulled off the most brilliant military maneuver in history.

After Stalingrad, mid 1943, the German Army on the retreat, moral at its lowest, General Von Manstien pulled off the most brilliant military armoured maneuvers in history and stopped the Soviet juggernaught dead in its tracks. Why was he able to do this? Because he turned off his radios and refused to relay information to Hitler. Ultra was useless. The Soviets were blind and we're slapped to a stop. The gigantic battle of Kursk followed a few months later.

Hitler never believed the pact between Communist Russia and the capitalist west could hold. He deliberately notdenuded the eastern front and went after the allies, believing there some peace they would come to. But they didn't. Hitler had failed to follow orders. Germany paid.

Saddam failed to follow orders. Iraq paid.

The ayatollahs may well be failing to follow orders. Iran may well be going to pay.

Will Trump follow orders?

James C said (March 17, 2017):

To posit Hitler as a warmonger is an egregious lie put forth by the real warmongers, FDR, Churchill, and Stalin. It is contrary to voluminous documentary evidence illustrating that the last thing Hitler wanted was war. The facts of the matter are that the Jews declared war on Germany in 1933, and that Hitler did everything in his power to avoid war, even to offering to come to England's defence if necessary. The Germans could have annihilated British and French troops at Dunkirk, but Hitler would not allow it. The soviets burned Neville Chamberlain in effigy after the Munich Agreement. That's how much the Communists wanted war. In my opinion, the following statement is historically untenable:

"Hitler was an Illuminati agent mandated to lead Germany into a catastrophic war where German nationalism would be blunted once and for all. World War Two was the most egregious hoax in history."

World War II was indeed the most egregious hoax in history, but definitely not for the reason you suggest.

Eliezer said (November 20, 2012):

According to researcher Rabbi Marvin Antelman, Hitler was conceived in a Sabattian ritual on the 9th of Av, in Austria. The town of his conception was obliterated following the Nazi occupation of Austria.

See, To Eliminate The Opiate Vol's 1 & 2.
http://www.zionistbookclub.com/eliminatetheopiate2.htm
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=184087.0

Antelmen writes, "Read about The Rabbinc Court accounts of wife swapping in Poland through the followers of the heretical Sabbatian Frankists Red Kabbala, excommunicated by the Supreme Rabbinic Court of Europe on Sivan 20, 1756 stating their "women are whores and their children are bastards to the tenth generation -- The Sabbatian ritual which conceived Adolf Hitler on the 9th of Av, fast day for the destruction of the First and Second Temples" on July 20, 1888, Hitler was born 9 months later April 20, 1889. Accordingly his real father was not Alois Shickelgruber and his Sabbatian roots are also maternal stemming from the Strones family," of Strones Austria.

Hitler's Origins
http://www.porges.net/HitlersOrigin.html

Adolf Hitler was born on 20 April 1889 at the Gasthof zum Pommer, an inn in Ranshofen, a village annexed in 1938 to the municipality of Braunau am Inn, Austria-Hungary.

Also see, Joseph Farrell's reference to The Holocaust, & its connection to "Babylon's Banksters: The Alchemy of Deep Physics, High Finance and Ancient Religion" https://www.amazon.ca/Babylons-Banksters-Alchemy-Physics-Religion/dp/1932595791#_
http://www.henrymakow.com/a_brief_review_of_farrells_bab.html

BM said (October 15, 2024):

In your article today “Europe’s Last Gasp”you wrote “We are living in the twilight of Christian civilization …”

Just remember the words of the Lord Jesus in Matthew 16:18 when he said to Peter “ And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock[a] I will build my church, and the gates of hell[b] shall not prevail against it”

That’s a comforting thought Henry!

Imran said (December 10, 2023):

I heard someone (a decent chap and a conservative) in Israeli politics decry these Jews in Israel as reminding him as parallel to the Ayatollahs of Iran. There is a problem with them as there are with the leftists. I don't know if the harrassment against Christians is as constant as the article puts it, but it has happened frequently. But I think the Israeli authorities do help keep these fanatics in check.

The leftists in Israel are not altogether wrong about these right wing fanatical bunch. It is good if the leftists and these right wing religious fanatical types do not ever have power in Israel. However, that is not the case unfortunately. Bibi does keep those right wing ayatollah type fanatics in his coalition in check. I can't say about the leftists who joined him recently after Oct 7.

rh said (December 9, 2023):

Thank you for posting and sharing this article.

My college history professor stated, back in the 1970s, in a classroom full of students, that we all had the Jewish ghetto concept backward. It was dedigned to keep us out, not to keep the Jews in and it was of the Jew’s making. That’s about all he said. I remember it because it was so contrary to what we were being taught regarding the plight of the European Jews.