Protocols of Zion are Genuine: Col. House Had a Personal Copy
March 17, 2018
(Ventriloquist Edward House, right, with his Dummy President Woodrow Wilson, left)
Some time ago, Stan Monteith, (1929-2014) a pioneer NWO researcher, found a typewritten copy of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" in the papers of Col. E.M. House at Yale University.
This seemed like confirmation of the widely held view that House (1858-1938) was a Rothschild agent. House was an "adviser" to Woodrow Wilson and FDR. It makes sense that he would have a copy of the Blueprint for the New World Order in his possession. He elaborated on this diabolical program in his political manifesto, "Philip Dru Administrator." (1912) I began a comparison of the two manuscripts here.
Spencer Percival continues this comparison below and makes the point, Why would
Rothschild's US consiglieri own a private typescript if The Protocols were a "forgery?"
"This is massive, the Protocols now having a direct provenance to an unimpeachable source which effectively destroys all the so-called debunking; even the ADL will have a hard job to discredit House as an anti-Semite."
We are human collateral against the national "debt": House on "Social Security" -" Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges."
by Spencer Percival
Colonel Edward Mandell House (July 26, 1858 - March 28, 1938) was an adviser or 'puppet master' of two US presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, overseeing passage of the Federal Reserve Act, the so called Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution to permit Congress to levy an Income Tax, America's entry into World War one, Versailles (where he also helped set up the Council on Foreign Relations, America's equivalence of the Royal Institute), recognition of the Soviet Union, gold confiscation bank holiday, and formed The New Deal.
Considered by many to be a major Rothschild agent, he exposed his agenda for humanity in a meeting with Woodrow Wilson.
"[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property1 in a national system2 designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging.
Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel5, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.
Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading6 to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.
They will be stripped of their rights7 and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund the government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges.
This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call 'Social Insurance.' Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office8 of our dummy corporation9 to foment this plot against America."
DID HOUSE TYPE THIS MS HIMSELF?
Notwithstanding all the furor that accompanied the Marsden publication from 1919 which continued throughout the twenties and thirties, House and his executors determined to leave to posterity this version of the Protocols.
On receipt of the copies I was most surprised at the tattered looking images of which were 99 manual typewritten pages replete with typo's and multiple corrections and other indications11 that this was being copied and that the typist wasn't a professional and therefore likely to be Edward House himself, which may suggest he didn't wish any other eyes to see the document, however without going to Yale University and comparing them to his other papers I cannot say conclusively it is equally possible that he received the MS 'as is' from another party.
My first action was to scan, ocr12 and proofread the manuscript and when done, one of the first things to stand out was missing protocols and duplicate ones. Whilst the missing protocol and one 'duplicate protocol' could be put down to a typo the same couldn't be said for Protocol XI. for which there are two distinct 'protocols', thus the House MS has in fact 25 protocols as against 24 protocols in the Marsden MS which may or may not have esoteric significance.
On closer examination what shows is a slightly different Protocol numbering and the splitting of a Marsden Protocol into two, thus Marsden Protocol 3 'Methods of Conquest' has moved to House Protocol 10 causing Marsden Protocols 4 and 5 to become House Protocols 3 and 4, as House Protocol 5 doesn't exist they realign at Protocol 6 and the second House Protocol 6 is, in fact, the first part of Marsden Protocol 7 and completed with House Protocol 7, the first of two Protocols' 11 in House relates to Marsden Protocol 10 and the second House Protocol 11 realigns with Marsden Protocol 11.
The first thing noticed is the economy of paragraphs in the House MS. But reading the two texts, although using alternate vocabularies, both still impart the same meaning or intent, which continues throughout the Protocols.
In Protocol 11 there is a Latin phrase, now Latin in French, English or Russian should be the same but here we have modus vivendi in the House MS and modus agendi in the Marsden MS, whilst it falls in with a consistent alternate vocabulary that imparts the same meaning or intent, for the reasons stated above you would expect it to be the same if it were a translation, additional a French term coups d'etat is used in House Protocol 11 but not in Marsden Protocol 11 but in Protocol 15 and not in House Protocol 15.
Henry Makow has compared the first eight pages of the House MS with the Marsden MS, and he concludes that the nuances of the different words are significant and whilst I do not disagree with that statement I consider the intent of the vocabulary of the text to be more significant.
Conclusion: Protocols were "Serving Notice"
Anyone who makes a honest study of the complete MSS cannot help but come to the conclusion that the source for the both of them is the same, whether that be a meeting or a text, with the inconsistencies noted above it points more to a meeting(s) than text, yet this does not explain the different orders in parts of the MS. That being the case the existence of the House MS proves the authenticity of the Marsden MS which most non-coincident theorists would have known anyway.
This is massive, the Protocols now having a direct provenance to an unimpeachable source which effectively destroys all the so-called debunking, even the ADL will have a hard job to discredit House as an anti-Semite.
As to the writer, I do not think it was an opposition copy for the simple reason it stands unique and surely the purpose of an opposition copy would be to disseminate it as widely as possible so that by now, over 100 years on, there would be several copies coming to light, also with this being about 9 years before the Marsden book came to press, it would have been a 'hot book'.
I think that it is more likely the work of a group, possibly Chabad or given that most these people are Luciferians and Cabbalists it may have even been channeled, which brings to mind another Woodrow Wilson quote:
"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."
Currently, my time is very limited, my main region of research being Law13 and health, As such, I have learned that Notice (as mentioned at the start) is an integral part of law systems starting with the cosmic law and down to the common and municipal law. Cities used to post (Notice) their laws at the gate, I now believe that such 'leaks' are in some cases by design, the fact is mankind has been noticed and on the fulfillment of their plans they can legally say you were told, you did not resist, you consented. However, I shall in all probability use the comparisons above as a start to complete a comparison volume (unless you beat me to it), but for now, here is House's ms PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETING OF THE ZIONIST MEN v2 Final (3).pdf
2 Although all states had birth records by 1919, the use of the standardized version was not uniformly adopted until the 1930's
3 Persons would be more correct, as these are attached to people.
4 Backed by the "full faith and credit" of the U.S. Government!
6 Record of Live Birth - Birth Certificate
7 The Bill of Rights does not apply to 14th Amendment U.S. Citizens.
9 The U.S.A. as opposed to the republic which is the united states of America.
10 Which may or may not be a translation.
11 Addition of footnotes and comments to MS.
12 Optical Character Reader.
You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2018/03/protocols-are-genuine.html
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at