Direct Link to Latest News

Below- Communists Have Controlled American Discourse Since 1930s (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Amazon Fires: Brazilian Readers Defend Bolsonaro

August 23, 2019

bolsonaro.jpeg

Commies Use Fires to Demonize Bolsonaro



Globalists accuse President Jair Bolsonaro of tacitly condoning the farmers, 

by insisting that Brazil should open up more of the rainforest 

to business interests like farming and mining. 

Roughly 60% of the rainforest is in Brazil. Readers rush to his defense. 








From Marcio:

After reading the silly Zero Hedge article about wildfires in the Amazon, you have retweeted, as a Brazilian, I beg you not to let yourself be deceived by the commie press. In short, please do not be naïve and do not help the globalists you are supposedly trying to fight.

Firstly, superpowers are not concerned about either Indians' welfare or the Amazon jungle or the world climate or the air quality, or else they would have pressed China to stop pollution and to wreck its industry. 

They are only interested in the wood (which many of their NGOs smuggle out of Brazil to environment-conscious Europe, Japan, Canada, and the USA), (gold, iron, copper, etc - some of the iron mines could be explored for over 400 years!) ore, the jungle pharmaceutical essences (extremely valuable!), drinkable water (some foreign ships smuggle that as well) and...farming for export to prevent them from starvation, especially after a nuclear war (South America and Africa are known as "reserve land" from which food would be imported and where the elite has property - for instance, Norwegian, Dutch and British Royals own lots of land in the Amazon, as well as many well-off people from other parts of Europe, Japan and North America). 

The Amazon is very profitable and the globalist elite wants to keep the profits to themselves (as they do in impoverished Africa), and, if they are not to be taken through corruption, they will take them by military force. We lose trillions of dollars due to smuggling of such resources, most of them carried out by such Amazon "saviors".

fires-map.png
Secondly, President Bolsonaro has always been a fierce enemy of socialists of all shades of red. He has survived an attempt of murder committed by a socialist party activist (he nearly died!) and he has been defamed by the globalist-run press. 

The communists have lost some of their grip on Brazil and its rich resources (which helped enrich and keep dictatorships in Cuba, Venezuela, Angola, Mozambique, China, Russia, Nicarágua, Bolívia, etc) and now they want to portrait Bolsonaro as a new Hitler, which is untrue. 

He wants to rebuild Brazil, wrecked by over 20 years of socialism. Then, his realistic approach against  crime to decrease its soaring rates (nearly 70,000 murders yearly, mostly through urban crime fostered by drug-dealing gangs, but no one seems to be concerned about such war-like slaughter) has been sabotaged by foreign and domestic NGOs,  as well as by corrupt politicians in the Parliament (National Congress), a.k.a. foreign agents disguised as congressmen and the press in order to destabilize the nation and to propose "public policies" (more socialism) for the most glory of the world tyranny.

1040.jpg
Thirdly, we are in the dry season from May until October - wildfires break out nearly everywhere. Besides that, there are rumors that those "kind" NGOs have set more fires than farmers (have you ever heard of Hybrid War?). The Amazon itself, according to a map displayed in the ZeroHedge article, has burned much less than the rest of the country. It is a huge place (like about half of the US Mainland area). Surveillance investments (and others as well) had to be cut down as the socialists drained the public funds through corruption and funding of socialism all over the world. Most of the fires are environmental crimes; however, there is a lack of resources to fight them.

Fourthly, as President Bolsonaro is not like the previous bankers'  puppets who used to be bribed by globalists before, I am afraid the Amazon will be stolen from Brazilians by military force. Lots of Indian Reservations were created and most of the NGOs encourage separatism and succession through the UN and foreign powers pressure under the excuse of "genocide and self-determination of Indian nations". Actually, the Indian population has grown more than the rest of the population; the government ensures they get all necessary support (good medical care, schools, welfare payments, tax exemption, etc) so that they are not seduced by foreign interests there. Nationalists are in peril!

<
Nevertheless, the press urges the UN and those foreign states to save the Amazon from Brazilians. I guess the next step is to foster a proxy war between Indians (coincidentally living in very resourceful areas) and the Brazilian military (as intelligence officials have long warned the government) - and then another Yugoslavia-like NATO and UN intervention will be on the way to ensure Brazilians will stay away from THEIR own resources in order to guarantee international companies profits. In short, they want us to lose sovereignity over our own territory - something the UK, the USA, France, Norway, Germany, Japan, Russia, China, etc would never accept, nor would the European protesters who recently vandalized Brazilian embassies in London and in Berlin. 

---
Marco writes:

I told you the globalists would not rest until they get rid of Bolsonaro and return Brazil to a socialist, subservient status in the NWO. Using fake pictures, fake data and incomplete analysis of the situation, and full support of the left, they are attacking the government that is doing the most to protect the environment. NASA just stated that fires are below average. 

Bols-fire.jpg
This is an unusually dry season, and half the fires are outside the forest. Much is located in Marxist Bolivia, an all-time record, where the government promotes forest clearing for farms. The  NGOs eco-mafia, the big European farms, they have a lot to lose with a strong Brazil. Also, the left: today the Car Wash police operation disclosed another US$ 1.5 Billion corruption scheme from the prior socialist government. They want attention away from that. European leaders also regretted the free trade agreement with Mercosul, which will expose the fragility and dependency of European (polluting) farms on subsidies. 

They can't compete with Brazilian agriculture, so they want to destroy it. Perhaps the wish is to starve the useless eaters of the world? The plan is to label Bolsonaro as an enemy of the environment and a risk for the planet, apply sanctions and put some globalist-leftist puppet back in power in a neutered, submissive country. Then, give them a pass to destroy anything they want without complaint, as they did in 15 years of socialism here. Seed the Amazon with leftist NGOs, bribe Indians and local politicians, and steal the biogenetic material, minerals and land.

-- 






Scruples - the game of moral dillemas


You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/08/brazilian-readers-defend-bolsonaro-.html
Articles >>

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Below- "Anti-Jewish" Conference (1882) Conceded Defeat (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Communists Have Controlled American Discourse Since 1930's

August 22, 2019


heming.jpg

(Left, John Dos Passos left, and Hemmingway, center, in Spain)

During the Spanish Civil War, novelist John Dos Passos realized that Communism is a Jewish banker scam to gain totalitarian control by pretending to champion have-nots. 

His friend Ernest Hemingway shot back: "Civil liberties, shit. Are you with us or against us?"  

Then, getting no reply, Hemingway lifted a clenched fist to Dos Passos' face: 

"You [quit] and you will be finished, destroyed. The reviewers in New York will absolutely crucify you. These people know how to turn you into a back number. I've seen them do it. What they did once they can do again."


The Red Decade Redux

by Harry Stein

(excerpt by henrymakow.com)

The case of Dos Passos is especially telling. In 1936, as a man of the Left, he was among America's leading novelists--arguably Hemingway's closest rival, having just published the third volume of his USA trilogy to wide acclaim, including a cover story in Time. It was thus understandable that he was among those recruited, along with Hemingway, to travel to Spain to make a film in support of the Republican cause. 

However, while there, Dos Passos began making inquiries about a close Spanish friend who'd unaccountably vanished, and eventually learned that Stalin's secret police had murdered him. Belatedly, his eyes were opened to the bloodcurdling reality behind the myths so artfully propagated at home. Worse, he refused to stay quiet about it.

Lyons recounts the episode only briefly, making the point that, as a result, when the celebrated author's next book was published three years later, critics discovered "that Dos Passos had never really known how to write." 

osvaldo-salas-ernest-hemingway-et-fidel-castro.jpg

(Illuminati rentboy Ernest Hemingway with Justin Trudeau's father)


The story was told in greater depth by historian Stephen Koch in his book The Breaking Point. With access to Dos Passos's unpublished notes, he includes a chilling account of Hemingway's last meeting with his onetime friend. Dos Passos plaintively asked, "What's the use of fighting a war for civil liberties, if you destroy civil liberties in the process?" 




Hemingway shot back: "Civil liberties, shit. Are you with us or against us?" Then, getting no reply, he lifted a clenched fist to the other's face: "You do that and you will be finished, destroyed. The reviewers in New York will absolutely crucify you. These people know how to turn you into a back number. I've seen them do it. What they did once they can do again."


morrie-ryskind-1895-1985.jpg

MORRIE RYSKIND

Another figure who makes a brief appearance in The Red Decade is screenwriter Morrie Ryskind, and his example speaks to the influence that his leftist foes would continue to wield years after The Red Decade's publication--even during the blacklist years of the late 1940s and early 1950s. 

One of the industry's most successful writers, he had numerous credits, running from the Marx Brothers' Animal Crackers and A Night at the Opera to My Man Godfrey and Stage Door. Ryskind broke ranks in 1947 by testifying in open session about Communist influence in the film industry. 

"In the twelve years prior to my testimony," he'd write in his memoir, I Shot an Elephant in My Pajamas, "I was consistently one of the ten highest-paid writers in Hollywood. I turned down, on the average, at least three assignments for everyone I accepted, and I feel safe in saying I was welcome at every studio in town. After I testified against The Hollywood Ten, I was never again to receive one single offer from any studio."

Few today, and fewer still in Hollywood will summon up much sympathy for those like Ryskind. In the contemporary view, as expressed in books, movies, and PBS documentaries beyond counting, outspoken anti-Communists of that era were the equivalent of Salem's fanatics, paranoids fixated on a nonexistent international Communist conspiracy, while those who refused to cooperate (and paid with their livelihoods) were heroic martyrs to free speech and free thought. 

Morally complex as that moment was, there were those on each side who fit these characterizations, and, of course, there's no question that the anti-Communist crusade swept up a great many more of Lyons's credulous Innocents than actual or even potential subversives. Yet it's also true that there were at least a handful who'd long since dispelled all doubt that their overriding loyalty was to the Stalinist state and, in some cases, had proved their ruthlessness in advancing its aims. And one can only shudder at what might have happened had their ilk achieved political power equal to their cultural influence.


COMMUNISM REJECTED, THEN EMBRACED


History didn't play out that way. To the contrary: the fall from public grace of that era's radical activists was so steep that for those growing up in the postwar years, the very word Communism was all but synonymous with barbarism and the crushing of the human spirit. For all Americans' internecine quarrels over that time and the doubts sown by Vietnam and Watergate, for five decades few questioned who were fundamentally the good guys and who were the bad, in the grand scheme. As late as 1989, in the jubilation following the fall of the Berlin Wall, it would have been hard even on American college campuses to find many who didn't believe that a profound evil had been defeated.

That's no longer the case today. From the Soviet gulags and the brutal crackdowns in Hungary and Czechoslovakia to children turning on parents during the Cultural Revolution and the Cambodian genocide, much that was once common knowledge seems to have been forgotten or gone unlearned. How many schools still make Orwell required reading? How many college history majors have even heard of the masterwork of his fellow prophet, Arthur Koestler, author of Darkness at Noon?

In today's Hollywood, where the 1950s blacklist stands as the great modern cautionary tale of the human capacity for evil, those with less than exemplary progressive politics routinely feel impelled to hide the fact from even close friends, and one can only guess at the grim fun Lyons would have with Tinseltown's ever-changing victim power ratings. Whose heroic struggle for justice constitute the hottest properties this week: women, African-Americans, gays, transgenders? Never mind that their box-office appeal is likely to extend no more than five miles beyond the studio gates.

---------------------

Related - Clash of Forces: Masonic and Communist Intrigues in Spain   (Juri Lina)  Thanks K!



First Comment from Ken Adachi -

Wow, what a terrific article. Harry Stein deserves a great deal of credit for bringing this amazing information forward. I had no idea of the fall suffered by Dos Passos and Ryskind before reading it here.

I have great respect for Hemingway the writer, but I also recognize the importance of the information brought our in this article. Hemingway, it should be noted, like Fidel, came from a wealthy, well-to-do family.  Such people usually can "afford" to play sympatico with the Left. They don't have to live in the dirt when push comes to shove (their position and wealth allows them an out to the harsh consequences suffered by most victims of communist savagery)

And while Hemingway drove an ambulance in Italy for a while during World War I, he was already a famous author and well known war correspondent during the Spanish Civil War, so he could come and go as he pleased and didn't have to fight or risk his life as did those in the Lincoln Brigade. He also thought of himself as a champion of the common man, whether in Spain or Cuba, and chose to view the essence of the Spanish Civil War as a struggle between the evil Franco-Fascist Haves and the courageous 'revolutionary  Have Nots. He expressed this romanticized theme flawlessly in his novel, For Whom the Bells Toll (and brilliantly portrayed in the movie with Gary Cooper and Ingrid Bergman). I don't think he wrote the book to glorify communism, but rather viewed himself as the heroic, but doomed, demolition expert, Roberto.

So while it's true that he portrayed the communist gypsies as heroic and courageous, I don't feel it's quite accurate to label him a covert communist propagandist. After World War I, Hemingway first fell in Love with Paris but soon formed a lifelong bond with all things Spanish following his visit to the bull run at Pamplona in 1923 I think.  Hemingway always felt sympathetic towards the poor, largely uneducated Spaniard with whom he drank at local taverns and sundry watering holes.  A certain percentage of these poor people fell for the Anarchist (communist) Party line of the early 1930s and jumped in with both feet, thumbing their nose at the rules and restrictions of both church and state, believing that they were 'liberating' themselves undoubtedly from oppressive, conventional rules. They just didn't realize Who was conning them and Why.

It's shocking to read what he said to Dos Passos, but it sounds like typical boozy, Hemingway machismo. He wasn't the polite, sensitive type. He drank ALL THE TIME, He was egotistical, combative and competitive by nature. He often deprecated other important writers and was mocking and cruel in writing towards Ezra Pound, who was not only his mentor but his intellectual and literary superior by a wide margin.

After publishing The Old Man and the Sea in 1952, Hemingway became a national hero to every Cuban who has ever lived or will ever live. They adored the guy. He could have continued to live in Cuba whether Bautista or Fidel ran the country.  It didn't matter. He was a national treasure and he was treated like a king. You expect him to go back to Idaho because the state department doesn't like him living in Castro's Cuba?

Hemingway's books are a product of his passions and his imagination; not communist ideology. He was a great writer who drank too much and couldn't adapt to the reality of growing older and losing his virility and attraction to younger women. He wanted to be Nick Adams forever, but life doesn't work that way.  Sadly, he blew his brains out at age 60, a few months after his good friend Gary Cooper, had died of lung cancer. May they both rest in peace.




Scruples - the game of moral dillemas


You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/08/communists-have-controlled-american.html
Articles >>

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Communists Have Controlled American Discourse Since 1930's "

Essel said (August 23, 2019):

My remarks relate to Ken Adachi's comment.

1°/ It is clear that E. H. was an atheist materialist, and therefore a communist at heart.

2°/ Ken, who seems to know the characters and the historical context well, says that E. H. was selfish. Now selfishness, which is defined as the disordered love of oneself, is at the source of all vices and all disturbances. As proof, we are told that he was an alcoholic. But there are worse things. Ken tells us that he was looking for worldly praise, to create a posture, in which he would appear to be a "good" according to the categories of the world (in the pejorativ sense of Saint John).

3°/ Even if this was not necessarily his intention, it is concluded from the two previous points that his work is subversive in nature and has no real historical value. For proof: E. H. appears in the literature programmes of all countries (de facto communists) and all major cities have streets to his name. Nowhere are there any Aristotle or Thomas Aquinas streets, which were of a completely different intellectual scope!

4°/ Ken concludes with "May they both remain in peace.". Of course we must wish it, but this prayer is likely to be in vain because, unless he has repented and converted in articulo mortis (but we do not see how he could have done so), suicide, which is a murder, the murder of himself, will earn him eternal damnation.

The unfortunate one thought he was only a matter, and, logically with his error, he thought he was neutered to end it all when he missed the material satisfactions. Unfortunately, he was mistaken and this error is now the norm.

I thought I had to make this correction in order not to make this behaviour a possible choice.

Below- White Privilege California Style (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

"Anti-Jewish" Conference (1882) Conceded Defeat

August 21, 2019

Adolf_Stoecker.jpg(Left, Adolf Stoecker (1835 -1909) was the court chaplain to Kaiser Wilhelm II, a politician, 
and a German Lutheran theologian who founded the Christian Social Party and attempted to
 roll back Jewish control. He helped organize the 1882 "Anti Jewish Conference.") 

A Dresden conference shows how Jewish hegemony
was a fait accompli 137 years ago,
and explains why the West's racial cohesion
and Christian heritage are under vicious attack. 
Read this and ask yourself, "Could Hitler have come to
power without Masonic Jewish complicity?" 



(Note - This is a key article I repost every year because I have many new readers.) 



The Secret Masonry is setting up "our own, to all appearance, off position which in at least one of its organs [Nazis] will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards." (Protocols of Zion, 12.11)

But no man said anything about him [Jesus] openly for fear of the Jews. (John 7:13)

 "A new war in defense of democracy and of alleged law is being prepared in all haste. An alliance of all the Jewish groups is already complete; it bears the official title of the alliance of the three great democracies, the English, the American, and the French. . . . Israel requires world war and soon!... Israel is positively of the opinion that time is getting short. To their mind, their world war is a necessity in order that, in the name of indivisible peace, all that portion of mankind who wish to cast off the Jewish yoke, may be laid low." 
   
-- 
Revue Internationale des sociétés secrétes, April 1937  



(Slightly revised from Jan 6, 2016 ) 
by Henry Makow Ph.D.


The last significant effort to defend Christian national values was the "First International Anti-Jewish Conference" held in Dresden in September 1882.

The conference attracted 300 prominent businessmen, aristocrats, politicians, clergy, lawyers, physicians, farmers and intellectuals from Germany, Austria, Hungry and Russia. They produced a manifesto addressed to "the Governments and Peoples of Christian Nations Threatened by Judaism" which shows how Jewish hegemony was a fait accompli 137 years ago, and explains why the West's racial cohesion and Christian heritage are in serious disarray. 

FINANCIAL AND CULTURAL INVASION

The Manifesto begins by saying Europe has been invaded by a foreign race more dangerous and insidious than Arabs, Tartars or Turks in the past because of "its means and objectives."

Jewish "emancipation" following the French Revolution ("Equality, Fraternity, Liberty") removed protections against "a race whose first and foremost thoughts and energies are everywhere aimed at putting other nations in the moral and material shackles of slaves..."

"According to the Jews' religious and national traditions, all of these peoples were created merely to serve them. The principle of equality was also applied to a race that does not wish to be equal with us, that considers itself a people privileged by God and [regards] the rest of mankind as lower beings, impure animals. The principle of fraternity was also applied to a race that does not even acknowledge non-Jews as neighbors and fellow human beings and according to whose Talmud non-Jews are enemies destined for eradication."

merkel-b-nai-b-rith.jpgLeft. Merkel receives an award from her masters.

"Moreover, cheating, stealing from them, bleeding them dry, bringing ruin upon them, perjuring against them, dishonoring, and even killing them constitutes an activity pleasing to their God. Small wonder, therefore, if modern liberalism, identifying more and more with the ascendant Jews, has taken the shape of pseudo-liberalism. In the Jews' hands, it has turned into a convenient tool for realizing their plans for world domination and putting irons on the European peoples."

As a result of Jewish monopoly on government and finance, "the farmer, the big landowner, the industrialist, the artisan, the merchant, etc. , have all gotten caught up in material dependency upon Jews...they were forced to turn into their obedient servants, their train bearers. What's more, the Jews hire influential men who are active in public life to fill well-paid positions at banks, railways, insurance companies, etc. These individuals are thus virtually kept as Jewish vassals and are the most zealous and influential supporters of Jewish power in the legislatures and governments. "

As a result of Illuminati Jewish instigated wars, "the governments of some indebted countries have become nothing more than Jewish institutions, Jewish collection agencies. This explains the complete inactivity of these governments with respect to the Jewish question and also their hostile behavior against their own populations in favor of Jewry."

THE MASS MEDIA

Due to media ownership, "until recently no newspaper in Central Europe would have dared to speak the truth vis - à - vis Jewry. Thus the Jews have become absolute masters, fabricators of public opinion. Any complaint raised against them, however, justified it may be, is suppressed. Any article that addresses the subject of Jewish dominance to the slightest extent is done away with."

Political advancement "is dependent upon the favorable position of the Jewish press...As a result, intellectual slavery and moral cowardice vis - à - vis Jewry is one of the most characteristic features of our age." 

Ambitious Christians  "become train bearers of Jewish power; they turn into traitors to their own nation and race and thus to their own blood relations. In many countries, the Jews have adulterated the system of [Freemason] lodges, stripped it of its essence, and degraded it into one of the most dangerous and effective instruments of Jewish power."

"Mainly by means of the press, Jewry increasingly undermines the Christian religion, which ... during Roman times,... saved the European Aryan race from moral bankruptcy, on the one hand, and semi-civilized barbarity, on the other, and also regenerated it. It did so by setting the civilization and culture of the European Aryan race on firm religious, moral, and social foundations."

"Christian religion is the most powerful reaction against Jewish tendencies to achieve world domination. It is an insurmountable protest against the elevation of the Semitic above the Aryan race, and so it is only natural that the Jewish clan is a sworn mortal enemy of both the founder of this religion and the Christian religion itself.

Accordingly, Jewry can only firmly establish the superiority and rule of the Semitic race when it has managed to defeat the natural reaction opposing it and to destroy the institution of Christianity."

CONCLUSION

The 1882 Manifesto deftly describes the impotence of Christian leadership which is just as obvious today. There was no "Second International Anti Jewish Conference." The participants recognized they were fighting a lost cause. They did not propose measures because "this nation of parasites has become much too deeply ingrained in the body of our societal and state life for this first congress to operate under the delusion that its potentially detailed propositions could be carried out today."

during.jpegThis was in spite of the fact that Eugen Duhring, left, laid out a detailed program the previous year (1881) in his book "On the Jews." Ironically, it required the Illuminati Jewish-sponsored Nazis to enact many of Duhring's proposals, which were similar to racial policies in effect in Israel today.

The rise of the Nazis led to the genocide of about six million German antiSemites (i.e. Nazis) in WW2 and some 50 million other non-Jews. Given the 1882 assessment, do you think the Nazis could have achieved power without Illuminati Jewish sponsorship? As in chess, often you sacrifice a player (i.e. non-Zionist Jews) to win the game. 

Generally, the tone of the Manifesto gets more petty and racist, tarring all Jews with the same brush, saying all Jews are cosmopolitans with no loyalty to country or attachment to land, incapable of honesty, hard work or scientific and creative originality, driving farmers to destitution with their usury. 

While I agree with the Manifesto's description of Organized Jewry, & its goals, many if not most Jews were patriotic, hard-working and wanted to assimilate. An estimated 100,000 Jews served in the German army in WW1, and 18,000 win the Iron Cross. 12,000 died in action. In the 1930's, 60% of all German Jewish marriages were interracial. The Illuminati had to create Hitler to force them to go to Israel.

Christian leaders should have encouraged the process of Jewish assimilation already underway. Instead, the 1882 Conference concluded that the only solution was their expulsion. 

"Europe belongs to the Christian peoples and therefore should not be the testing ground for the hunger for power of any hostile, domineering, non-Christian national element. The history of past centuries amply proves that legal decrees restricting the Jewish race - no matter how strict they are - do not achieve the desired result."

Whatever we think of this Manifesto, it does provide a unique historical perspective on our world today. We are living in the twilight of Christian civilization which has suffered a series of colossal failures and defeats which have been disguised as just wars, civil rights, diversity, sexual liberation, feminism, gay rights, migration, etc. But this perspective can strengthen our resolve to oppose the further degradation of society by the satanist Illuminati.


--------
RELATED - German Jews Would Have Backed Hitler 
------------- 25% of Germans, 42% of children are from Migrant Backgrounds
Makow -  Anti Semitism has Respectable Pedigree
---------    World War One- First Christian Holocaust 



First Comment from Tony B:


Not only is bloody Talmudic rule a memory in the Russian Federation at least, but Christianity has come back to those lands with an unheard-of rapidity and power, it has come back more pure than when lost, purified through the crucible of hellfire, suffering, and sacrifice.  There is no selfish delusion in this return of Christianity as is now common in most of the rest of what used to be the Christian world.  

Whether or not the "west" is wise enough to have fears of the steel strength of this Christianity which has risen from the dead, you can bet the devil has been taken aback from what he had considered a clear victory to brag about to the rest of the world.  

True, materially, the federation is split about 50/50 with the "Atlanticists" (western satanic prostitute faction) in control of most of the business and the central bank is still under Rothschild control, but the real force in Russia today is spiritual without fear and a knowledge of the people that they are right with God while the rapidly decaying west has sold its soul to the devil.  So long as this force remains pure Talmudism loses its bragging rights and shows itself to be a paper tiger spiritually, as its morally conquered west crumbles under the delusions of Talmudic/satanic "exceptionalism."

Interestingly, although Talmudists have been pushed out of power in the new government, Jews, in general, are free to be Russians in whatever capacity they wish.  Also, Christianity is only the major Russian religion, all religions of Russia are secure in their place.  This raises questions for westerners as few of us in the west have a true understanding of what it is to be Russian.  Their concept of nationality seems more spiritual than worldly.






Scruples - the game of moral dillemas


You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/08/1882-Manifesto-Puts-NWO-in-Perspective.html
Articles >>

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for ""Anti-Jewish" Conference (1882) Conceded Defeat "

Doug P said (August 22, 2019):

The basic problem we face is, as Jack Nicholson once said in a movie "You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!" and this is the problem with the majority of the population and those of us goyim that do reach positions of influence "go along to get along" because "if you can't beat them, join them". The fault lies with the lower orders of our population who care nothing but for entertainment and material goods. They will need to be managed in a technological age where there is simply not enough work to keep them busy. Who wants to manage them?

This could all be a grand experiment looking for the once thing technology cannot supply - conscience and moral fibre.

Lindsay said (January 8, 2016):

You wrote, Christian leaders should have encouraged Jewish assimilation."

Totally and vehemently disagree.

Jews are a race, a community. They need to have their community and perpetrate their traditions, customs, way of life.

Semitic people are not Indo-Europeans. These groups should not be intermarrying.

As before, they should've been kept in their communities and just restricted in what they could do.

Because the Jewish soul would still come up. A Jew can never really assimilate to European culture and way of life. We are very different people. To deny that would deny particularity. God created particularity and so each particularity has its own specific values and truths inherent in itself. That is why there is diversity in the world. If Jews "assimilated" they would lose their particularity, identity.

God does not want that. God created All the nations of the world, and they are to stay separate, and viable.

The problem is that because the Jew has not accepted His Messiah in the name of Jesus Christ, they will always be infected with Messianism. That is why they can not be assimilated. Even when a Jew converts to Christianity, he is to maintain his culture, traditions and his people. He shall not be assimilated.

All nations/races are to be preserved; all particularity is to be preserved.

--

Thanks Lindsay

If this were true , I don't think Jews would intermarry at the rate they do.

henry

Tim said (January 6, 2016):

Maybe the fire bombing by the Allies of the mostly non-military target of Dresden during WWII was payback.

Peter said (June 5, 2014):

Having seen David Irving's talks I question the 6 million figure.

The 6 million entered the lexicon in the 1800s and has remained ever since.

Auschwitz has changed its memorial plaque from 4 million to 1 million.

Minus 3 million but the 6 remains untouched.
Bad maths?

---

to Peter

I'm talking about the six million Nazis who died!!!!! and the 50 million other non-Jews.
We are so brainwashed we can't even see what WW2 was!


Christine said (June 5, 2014):

Amongst other things, the manifesto mentions the Jews as being „fabricators of public opinion”. Of course that is true.

I would just like to add that Satan, through his minions the Canaanite Jews*, has done more than just manipulate public opinion. The Canaanites have, under the auspices of the devil, created a parallel reality which some call the “matrix” for us all to be enslaved in. Yes, the “reality” we live in is actually and factually an utter fabrication.

To the luck of those Lucifer dupes, 0,01 percent of all people alive today – and maybe even less – do not even suspect their own enslavement, because life has “always been this way”. Most folks have no idea of how life could really be and in fact – is.

When God comes back to judge the quick and the dead, those of us who trust in and are re-established by Him will finally find out what true life really is – namely, paradise.

Can you image how it will be to breathe in REAL air? To eat REAL food? To be a REAL human being? Before we get there, though, we will have to go through hell on earth (as below, so above) but it will have been worth the wait.

*These “Jews” go by the names of free mason, Mormon, druid, witch, knights Templar, Rosicrucians, royals, princes, queens et al.

Jim said (June 5, 2014):

Where as Christians of yesterday could see that the Jews were a force to reckoned with, nearly all Christians of today have been so brainwashed that they are unable to comprehend the power the Jews wield over them.

Today's Christians are of the firm belief that if they don't bless Israel (the Jews) then God will curse them. (I call this "spiritual blackmail). They are afraid to criticize anything about the Jews for fear of being cursed by God... and this gives the Jews the ability to run roughshod.

In the mind of the Christian, to question Israel's treatment of the Palestinians or to question the Jews "chosen-ness" or to point out the Jews control of the banking system and media is not only anti-Semitic but it's racist and demonstrates a hatred for the Jews.

The ignorance of today's Christians will be their demise. But once they know the truth, they will be free!

JG said (June 4, 2014):

Wow, it's as if this manifesto was written yesterday. The same plot, by the same culprits, against the same people.

Had it not have been for Germany in WW1 and WW2 Europe may have suffered the same genocidal fate that Russia did under Communism in the 1930's.
World Order Communism today cannot be implemented around the globe without America's military might and ignorance through complicity.

The US has become International Jewry's "pit bull" on a leash. The Jews have become their material lifeline because they control their bread. And, for this reason alone the Jews will continue to go virtually unchallenged.

It really is sad how the American Congress in Washington tries to save face with itself by calling Israel their "best friend" and "only ally" as Israel drags them into more foreign wars and spies on their highest government institutions including the Oval Office.

But, not to worry, it's all just a Judeo-Christian thing.

Feminism isn't New---Aristophanes - Assembly of Women

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

August 21, 2019

41yoIQNTEnL._SX315_BO1,204,203,200_.jpgFeminism isn't new
A specter is haunting Athens, the specter of communism. This premise animates the plot of Aristophanes' comedy "Ecclesiazusae" (or "Assembly of Women"), wherein the heroine Praxagora leads a conspiracy of hags dressed as men to vote themselves into power. Fresh from her victory, Praxagora unveils her plan for a brave, new world where all property, children, and sex are held in common. What follows is an uproariously funny, shockingly vulgar, tremendously insightful satire of communists and the logical consequences of their ideology. Mayhew's translation and introduction would make for a perfect adjunct to any discussion of Plato's *Republic*, especially in an introductory Greek Lit & Civ course. 

First, Aristophanes has arguably innovated aspects of communism that would later influence Plato. Second, the play contains so many allusions to contemporary events (helpfully explained by Mayhew), that it provides a useful introduction to ancient history, political philosophy, and dramatic literature. Last, the comedy is funny enough for anyone (particularly sophomores!) to enjoy, and if it's the only play they actually read, they'll know something important about ancient Athens, thanks to the guidance of Robert Mayhew. (Amazon Review)

A Few Random facts about the LGBTQ "Community"

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

July 19, 2019

bz-5cfc8f07d768d.jpeg

Jewish National Poet Confessed to Penetration of Christian society by Crypto-Jews

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

July 18, 2019



Confessed penetration of Christian society by Crypto-Jews .

bialik.jpg
Hayim Bialik - the Israeli 'National Poet' and Zionist, stated in a speech given at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, May 11, 1933 .

"Judaism, which was destroyed politically (following the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD), went to the big world and adapted its goods to its wanderings as an army going to war, a 'moveable state'." The Jews were forced to smuggle their goods from border to border, so they chose abstract goods, easy to smuggle, which allowed them, despite the ghettoes and restrictions, to penetrate everywhere.

Such penetration was not without the deliberate connivance of the Jews in the form of assistance provided in a thousand ways, means and disguises.It has been affected in great measure by crypto-Jews, who permeated Christianity and spoke through the mouth of Christianity.  

By these means, by the Jewish will and by the power of their Jewish blood and by instinct of 'reprisal', it is they who, in principle, are the creators of the Renaissance (reason displaces faith in Christ), liberalism, democracy, socialism and communism.

All this was done mainly by unknown anonymous Jews, secret Jews, crypto-Jews who mingled with the Gentiles and fed great thinkers or by the influence of the Jews who, in the great crises of freedom, stood behind the scenes or through Jewish teachers and scholars of the Middle Ages.They were disciples of Jewish teachers who led Protestant movements."