(Kirsten Dunst, not Gretchen) 

"Deep State Insider Revelations on Presidential Grooming & Donald Trump"

This memoir was sent to me anonymously.

I think it is genuine but the "revelations" are underwhelming and decidedly pro-Trump. 

The idea that he wasn't into underage girls is BS. 

Nonetheless, it does provide some valuable insights into the workings and plans of the "Deep State." The assertion that "China is the Future" certainly rings true. So does the reference to a  grooming program for future US Presidents.

Gretchen- "Shout-Out to Christians, Rick Wiles, John Piper, Chuck Baldwin, and Dr. Charlie Ward"

By Gretchen

(henrymakow.com) 

In 1992, in my late teens, I was a beautiful girl modeling in NYC, when I met and fell in love with a mysterious "Illuminati" man, who swept me into the world of the Deep State. 

Over the next several years, we traveled the world to palatial mansion parties, dinners with VIPs at five-star restaurants, and private clubs like the Bohemian Grove and yes, members bring in women. 

At the Grove, I met Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld, presidents of banks and corporations, judges, and other power players, who work behind the scenes, and many of these same people are also members of The Council on Foreign Relations. 

This world appears to have a power structure in rings of ascending power or a hierarchical pyramid, with a top cabal of elites. The men discussed business deals, political strategies and joked, while I intuitively knew to keep quiet.

At the Grove, I also met young men, often first-born, who were made to feel special for being recruited into a secret CIA U.S. presidential grooming military program ("groomies"). I learned about this from overhearing various conversations because I believe my mystery man was somehow involved as a handler of these potential future U.S. Presidents. 

They recruited them from within the CIA, military, and high level (33 degrees and above) Masonic families. I remember in the beginning these men were passionate, patriotic, and nationalistic; one was waving a small US flag. These men were a mix of Republicans and Democrats with opinions and ideas about what they wanted to do to make a better America.

However, each man soon realized, like any soldier, that they had to follow the orders of their commanders, this cabal of elites, who control both sides and makes all the decisions. Thus, their individual ideas were dropped, and instead the elites' "big ideas" were adopted. Occasionally, there were moments where I made small talk.

 I remember once speaking with a groomie, it was an election year and I asked him, whom he was voting for. He replied, "You know, I'm being groomed for president." 

I nodded, "Ya, I know," 

He continued, "Well, They have not decided which side They are going to put me on, so I'm not allowed to say which side I voted for."

The elite cabal used occult practices to systematically brainwash or mind control these men over time. I witnessed them change from being confident and caring about America into being cool, globalists, where even the Fourth of July celebrations were distained. 

Thus any creativity was crushed and they somehow became dumbed down, as they fell into mimicking lockstep. The grooming program included learning how to be expert liars, and to live in two worlds, with a split Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide personality. Each groomie spent time with former U. S. Presidents at their secret grand estates, which are in foreign countries with armed security, (so don't be fooled that Jimmy Carter "shuns riches, lives modestly").

Further, these groomies were studying how to speak Chinese and if they were not already married they were encouraged to marry non-American women and in particular Chinese women. I remember asking my mystery man, why the focus on China and he said, "China is the future," like an affirmation.

I noticed, the groomies lost their inner joy and it was replaced with phony happiness and a veiled paranoia. I remember another time, I slipped off and wondered around and I came upon one of the groomies weeping with such great sadness. I softly approached him and tried to say something comforting. 

Broken, he cried, "They lied, They lied, I can't trust anyone." They are the cabal of elites. My mystery man mentioned that crying and insomnia was a phase; he admitted that he cried for days until he got over it. I now realize the "crying phase" was after members unwittingly chose to sign a contract with the devil, their souls were literally sucked out and replaced with legions of demons and their consciousness was seared with a hot iron making them hopelessly reprobate. My love kept me trapped like Gretchen with Faust to my mystery man.

They discussed a potential problem when a whole crop of potential groomies died, lost their minds or disappeared. If you research deaths of first-born males from prominent wealthy American families, like Fred C. Trump Jr., Davis H. Murdock II of Dole Food Co. and many others you will find a pattern of drug and alcohol abuse and death. 

My understanding was that the grooming programmer was too sadistic on them and/or that the process was rushed such that they were not ready and they freaked out and ultimately killed themselves. I remember a story about a son of Rothschild, who went to some ritual initiation meeting and freaked out from some experience (possibly satanic ritual child sacrifice)? This Rothschild changed his name, left everything behind and went into hiding until his death a few years ago in his mid-sixties.

"ONE WORLD LEADERS"

They also had a parallel program developing an elite international group of "one world leaders" of teenage boys and girls, who went to a special traveling school, where classes were being held for three months at a time in various countries. Both programs had lots of problems, setbacks and the Deep State was behind their scheduled timelines to move into position the one-world government. 

So when Dr. Charlie Ward wonders why Americans don't have younger presidential candidates in their 50s, and 60s, it's because They messed up, miscalculated and lost them.

I remember once, soundly sleeping next to my mystery man, when his special red phone rang, waking us up in the middle of night; he was given instructions to avoid certain areas and he told me to avoid these too, later, the news reported this area was bombed.

Also, everyone was encouraged to stop eating meat and become vegetarians.

There was this strange secrecy and I saw him intermittently, which led me to wonder if my mystery man was cheating on me. I became very jealous, so I began snooping through his things, looking for photos of another girl.

 In locked desks and closets (which I picked) I found useless sealed top-secret files, which I opened containing CIA employment agreements, bioweapon government contracts, an Israeli human cloning factory document, multiple passports, including an Israeli passport and instructions on who and how much money to send to various nonprofit organizations. 

I briefly glazed over these things of which I had no interest because I was looking for photos or evidence of another woman. Today, I realize those documents were very important. 

What I came to understand was that these elites functioned like one big mafia family in which they worked together to create great wealth and to move their one world order agenda forward. So even though some CEO may appear to have created a company on their own, they did not. The elites behind the scenes put them into position and made the success happen via networking, technology, or patent rights, seed funding and their controlled media outlets that publish /promote whatever they want. Therefore, since their company's "success" was a joint effort, profits are shared via donations or other deals or investments that they were instructed to do.

DUMPED BUT STILL DESIRABLE

After seven years, I was dumped at 24 years old and was never invited back to the Grove. My mystery man never loved me it was all lies and I was heartbroken.

Simultaneously, while I was non-exclusively dating my mystery man and during periods of breakups, I dated other men. My youth and beauty, like a billion dollars in the bank, garnered me invites into what I would describe as second or third tier world power players, down from the top Deep State Bohemian Grove. This is where I separately met Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump.

I was presented to Donald Trump to date. Donald was very cordial, but I was not his type, because, I was not tall and I had a svelte teenager's body. Donald liked tall mature women with curves. He had no interest in underage girls. Around Christmas time 1992, I remember some gossip where people were trying to convince Donald Trump to get Marla Maples to have an abortion. woman, who was also friends with Jeffery Epstein, seemed upset that Donald would not just have Marla get an abortion. Donald was completely adamant that he was going to marry Marla because he did not believe in abortion nor did he want a bastard child. I always respected Donald for this.

I met Jeffrey Epstein at the Stuart Pivar parties. Mr. Pivar was a very kind, caring man, a visionary, who had a passion for all things artistic. When the Jeffery Epstein story broke, I was afraid my name was going to show up in his black book--luckily it did not. I knew Jeffery Epstein was a phony because of the things I had seen and heard. Jeffery was not real power. So when Jeffery asked me to massage his feet with a dildo, I rolled my eyes and just laughed, "No!" He knew I knew. 

Yet, Jeffrey was some type of player, I didn't know what his game was, but I knew he had many faces, that he knew how to compartmentalize and only show a certain face to certain people. Stuart Pivar had no idea who the real Jeffrey Epstein was. Epstein preyed on people like Pivar, who unwittingly gave Epstein legitimacy and cover through his New York Academy of Art.

Although I was right there, I did not know Jeffrey was abusing women and underage girls. Note: in most European countries age 16 was age of consent. Although that is not the age of consent in America, most of these international elites were operating on the European age code. Back then I had no idea or knowledge of the existence of child sex trafficking or sacrifice or orgy sex and drug parties. Although I was invited to these parties, I did not see it nor could I imagine that it was going on. 

Further, I know from my conversations with Donald Trump and Stuart Pivar, they had no idea that child sexual abuse or sex trafficking that was going on either.

I remember a nun from a Catholic school told me how sick she was to learn years later that right under her nose, the priests were abusing children in her parochial school.

Years later, I discovered some of those same parties were compartmentalized. Where the uninitiated, such as Donald Trump, Stuart Pivar and myself were signaled the party was over or was moving to another place around midnight, so we left. Years later, another model told me, after certain people left, the drugs came out, the clothes came off and these parties turned into orgies and underage girls were brought in.

People ask me, but what about Donald Trump's comment: "Grab 'em by the pussy." Put into context, what every rock star knows and what Donald Trump shockingly discovered, after he became a TV celebrity from The Apprentice, is the realization that there are these slutty women, who relentlessly throw themselves at famous celebrity men begging and demanding sex. 

Unless a man becomes a celebrity, he would have no idea that this segment of the female population actually exists, unless they experienced it. Donald had no idea how low and brazen some of the female population can act and he was commenting on that sub-section. But no one wants to acknowledge, that there are these slutty man-eating women. Donald simply called it as it is.

In 2016, I contacted my mystery man to ask him about the Trump-Clinton election, expecting to hear that Donald Trump was another one of their left/right controlled puppets. But to my surprise, he said, "Donald Trump is not with us." Which actually made sense because groomies were very controlled and on guard all the times. Also, my guess is that if Donald Trump became a Mason, he is only a first or second degree and hopefully he renounced that.

Finally, people want to know: Why Donald Trump has not arrested Hillary Clinton and all the other swamp criminals. Answer: Because Hillary and all the rest are not US Citizens. Hillary and the gang are State Nationals. Our U.S. admiralty courts and department of justice are only set-ups to convict Federal US citizens. The entire underpinning of the US government along with the US presidential position was stripped from the original and is not legally based--it does not actually exist and insiders like Hillary know the legal maneuvers to make themselves exempt and immune. They can only be brought to justice through the military courts or common law courts.

To understand this every American needs to read Anna Von Reitz's Some Assembly Required 

Watch American hero: Russell-Jay: Gould. War Castles series and The Last Flag Standing 

I pray Americans work together. Realize that this county was founded when 56 leaders of their communities signed the Declaration of Independence putting their life on the line for Freedom. Please stop any infighting and let's work together to save humanity from this Satanic New World Order and Dark Brotherhood, in Jesus Christ's name, Amen.

"Substitute scamdemics for war and the same "Iron Mountain" authority over people is put in play...substitutes or enhancements to the war system must be credible and must be accepted by the vast majority of the population.

RFIM states that 'new political machinery would be needed at once" and "the threat will have to be invented.'"

 'The Report From Iron Mountain': Revelation of the Method for Warmongering and Tyranny or a Satirical Tome?

by Russ Winter

(abridged by henrymakow.com) 

Dial Press in 1967 published an unauthored book titled "The Report from Iron Mountain on the Possibility and Desirability of Peace" that the publisher put forth as a report from a government-appointed panel. 

The publisher claims it's the product of a special and secret study group of 15 men whose identities were to remain secret. The year it was published, it became a New York Times bestseller.

A 79-page pdf of "The Report from Iron Mountain" (RFIM) is available via Wikispooks.

The heavily footnoted report concluded that peace was not in the interest of a stable society and that even if lasting peace "could be achieved, it would almost certainly not be in the best interests of society to achieve it."

 War was a part of the economy. Therefore, it was necessary to conceive a state of war for a stable economy.

The major conclusion of the report was that, in the past, war has been the only reliable means to achieve that goal. It contends that only during times of war or the threat of war are the masses compliant enough to carry the yoke of government without complaint.

RFIM sets up the false dialectic of nations versus world government. It's implies that the national system is highly dependent on war, and that the cure is one-world government. This is invalid on its face.

Examples of "Iron Mountain" logic and revelation of method:

War is the defining element of any nation's existence vis-a-vis any other nation. Without the war system no government has ever been able to acquiesce in its legitimacy or right to rule society.

The possibility of war provides the external necessity without which no nation can remain in power. The basic authority of the modern state over it's people resides in it's war power."

War is a necessary economic waste. It operates outside the normal supply and demand system. It creates artificial demand. Defense spending is a simulator of national metabolism. War is progressive for research and development of weapons systems spurring technological advances.

WINTERWATCH TAKEAWAY NO.1

Substitute scamdemics for war and the same "Iron Mountain" authority over people is put in play. In the RFIM scheme, substitutes or enhancements to the war system must be credible and must be accepted by the vast majority of the population.

RFIM states that "new political machinery would be needed at once" and "the threat will have to be invented."

Interpretation: Keep war system until all substitutes (such as scamdemics) are in place and running so that justification for autocratic kakistocracy rule has continuity.

A member of the panel, an unknown professor at a college in the Midwest, decided to release the report to the public.

On Nov. 26, 1967, RFIM was reviewed in the book section of the Washington Post by Herschel McLandress, which was the pen name for John Kenneth Galbraith, a Harvard economics professor and U.S. Ambassador to India John Kenneth Galbraith during President Kennedy's administration.

Galbraith, who also had been a member of the CFR, said that he knew firsthand of RFIM's authenticity because he had been invited to participate in it. Although he was unable to be part of the official group, he was consulted from time to time and had been asked to keep the project a secret.

G. Edward Griffin wrote in his book "Creature from Jekyll Island":

Although the origin of the report is highly debated, the document itself hints that it was commissioned by the Department of Defense under Defense Secretary Robert McNamara and was produced by the Hudson Institute located at the base of Iron Mountain in Croton-on-Hudson, New York. The Hudson Institute was founded and directed by Herman Kahn, formerly of the Rand Corporation. Both McNamara and Kahn were members of the CFR.

The final candidate for a useful global threat was pollution of the environment. This was viewed as the most likely to succeed because it could be related to observable conditions such as smog and water pollution- in other words, it would be based partly on fact and, therefore, be credible. Predictions could be made showing end-of-earth scenarios just as horrible as atomic warfare.

Accuracy in these predictions would not be important. Their purpose would be to frighten, not to inform. It might even be necessary to deliberately poison the environment to make the predictions more convincing and to focus the public mind on fighting a new enemy.

The masses would more willingly accept a falling standard of living, tax increases, and bureaucratic intervention in their lives as simply "the price we must pay to save Mother Earth."

As the Report pointed out, truth is not important in these matters. It's what people can be made to believe that counts. "Credibility" is the key, not reality.

  JEWISH ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT THIS REPORT 

Three men -- Victor Navasky, Richard Lingeman and Leonard C. Lewin -- allege they lied to create a political parody as a leaked government report supposedly delivered to Mr. Lewin by one of the 15 members of a special government group.

Having read "Iron Mountain," I really don't see how these echo-chamber leftists would have had the motivation, insight and ability to concoct this book. It's a non-starter for me, but decide for yourselves.

But in 1972, after the book gained significant traction for over half a decade in the patriot community, Mr. Lewin suddenly materialized to announced that he was the real author of the report; and furthermore, it was written anomalously as a "satire."

Lewin, the Jewish self-proclaimed "author," denied that RFIM was a real government report; and therefore, was not in the public domain and insisted on copyright protection. Rather than allow free and open discussion, his posse then proceeded to devote all of their energy to exposing his own alleged work as a hoax and suppress the book, with nary a positive mention of the prophetic revelation of the method messages contained in RFIM.

The copyright was ultimately enforced after a lingering legal fight with the Liberty Lobby, which was represented by Mark Lane, who wrote "Rush to Judgment," a book that challenged the Warren Commission's account of the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

Victor Navasky was the editor and later the publisher of the leftist rag The Nation. The Jewish Navasky was also a supporter of alleged Soviet spy Alger Hiss, having published vociferous defenses of the man's innocence in The Nation.

This self-admitted, takes-one-to-know-one hoaxster and liar later wrote a script called "The Experts Speak: The Definitive Compendium of Authoritative Misinformation."In 2008, he wrote a neocon Zionist puff piece called "Mission Accomplished! (or How We Won the War in Iraq)."

In 2005, Navasky was named chairman of the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR). This appointment engendered some controversy. Critics on the political right saw this as hiding that -- despite the magazine's purported lack of political bias -- a "major left-wing polemicist is calling the shots at CJR without any mention on the masthead."

In 2008, Victor Navasky asserted his involvement in creating RFIM and named Leonard Lewin as the main writer with "input" from the aforementioned economist Galbraith, two editors of the satirical magazine Monocle (Marvin Kitman and Richard Lingeman) and himself.

 Richard Lingeman in his own biography page states he was an intel agent. In the Army Counter-Intelligence Corps, wrote Lingeman, he found himself "plunked in an appalling hotbed of McCarthyism.

"By luck of the draw, I ended up in Japan, semi-undercover and spying on ultra-nationalist groups."

Lingeman wrote "Drugs from A to Z," a dictionary of slang and illicit substances published by McGraw-Hill. He then went on to become executive editor of The Nation.

Simon & Schuster, a unit of Viacom, Inc., has its own suppression group of electronic detectives, who aggressively patrol the Internet for copyright violations of its publications. They were helped by a tipster, who simply called himself "nobody," an anonymous messenger, who sent emails alerting company lawyers about the appearance of pirated copies and the locations of RFIM texts.

 WINTERWATCH TAKEAWAY #2

Given that the owners of the copyright want to make a buck, the book today is not entirely suppressed and can be bought on Amazon for a reasonable price - but with the hoax disclaimer. The latest edition comes with a 20-page forward by Leonard Lewin and Victor Navasky. They laboriously drum out their reasoning as to why RFIM should be dismissed as a fraud.

Doth protest too much, in my opinion, and in an odd manner, especially when one considers that the book is so over the target.

The whole sistema has piled on to the hoax narrative. The book was even listed in the "Guinness Book of World Records" as the "Most Successful Literary Hoax."

Regardless, and much like the "Protocols of Zion," the important point is that RFIM, whether written as an amoral think-tank study or political satire, explains the reality that surrounds us. Regardless of its origin, the concepts presented in it are now being implemented in almost every detail. No wonder the sistema has tried to steer the narrative, memory hole and deep-six the book.

----

Related- Report from Iron Mountain - Blueprint for Tyranny  (Video)

----------------------------

A Better Economy is Possible but we Need to Reimagine Capitalism to Do It

by Klaus Schwab

(Excerpt by henrymakow.com) 

 ...The same economic system that created so much prosperity in the golden age of American capitalism in the 1950s and 1960s is now creating inequality and climate change.

 And the same political system that enabled our global progress and democracy after World War II now contributes to societal discord and discontent. Each was well-intended but had unintended negative consequences.

Yet there are reasons to believe that a better economic system is possible--and that it could be just around the corner. As the initial shock of the COVID crisis receded, we saw a glimpse of what is possible, when stakeholders act for the public good and the well-being of all, instead of just a few.

Mere months after the pandemic began, work was started on more than 200 potential SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Many of them resulted from a multinational collaboration involving both the public and private sectors, like AstraZeneca's collaboration with Oxford University in the U.K. Companies like Unilever approached the World Economic Forum's COVID Action Platform with offers to supply hygiene products, ventilators or simply logistical help. There was also strong cooperation between governments and business, to secure the funds needed for vaccine development and distribution.

Looking forward, such virtuous instincts can become a feature of our economic systems rather than a rare exception. Rather than chasing short-term profits or narrow self-interest, companies could pursue the well-being of all people and the entire planet. This does not require a 180-degree turn: corporations don't have to stop pursuing profits for their shareholders. They only need to shift to a longer-term perspective on their organization and its mission, looking beyond the next quarter or fiscal year to the next decade and generation. Some are already doing so.

Maersk, a Danish shipping giant, for example, divested its oil and gas divisions, and is focusing on providing sustainable shipping solutions. Reacting to increasing pressure from climate activists and younger generations, BlackRock asked the CEOs of companies it invested in to more explicitly pursue environmental, social and governance goals. These decisions may hurt short-term profits for itself as shareholder, but it maximizes long-term returns in a world where people increasingly revolt against a system they perceive as unfair.

Building such a virtuous economic system is not a utopian ideal. Most people, including business leaders, investors and community leaders, have a similar attitude about their role in the world and the lives of others. Most people want to do good, and believe that doing so will ultimately benefit everyone, including a company's shareholders. But what's been missing in recent decades is a clear compass to guide those in leading positions in our society and economy.

(Klaus Schwab, human benefactor, and visionary)

For the past 30 to 50 years, the neoliberalist ideology has increasingly prevailed in large parts of the world. This approach centers on the notion that the market knows best, that the "business of business is business," and that government should refrain from setting clear rules for the functioning of markets. Those dogmatic beliefs have proved wrong. But fortunately, we are not destined to follow them.

In September, my belief that a more virtuous capitalist system is possible was reaffirmed by an initiative of the forum's International Business Council led by Brian Moynihan of Bank of America. They released the Stakeholder Capitalism Metrics: nonfinancial metrics and disclosures that will be added (on a voluntary basis) to companies' annual reporting in the next two to three years, making it possible to measure their progress over time.

Doing so requires answering questions such as: What is the gender pay gap in company X? How many people of diverse backgrounds were hired and promoted? What progress has the company made toward reducing its greenhouse-gas emissions? How much did the company pay in taxes globally and per jurisdiction? And what did the company do to hire and train employees?

The initial idea that companies should try and optimize for more than just short-term profits came around 2016 from a handful of business leaders who wanted the private sector to play a role in achieving the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Individuals such as Moynihan, Frans van Houten of Philips and Indra Nooyi, then at PepsiCo, enlisted many of their peers in this commitment.

In the following years, pressure from social- and climate-justice movements such as Fridays for Future (inspired by Greta Thunberg), #MeToo and Black Lives Matter added to the sense of urgency. Business needed to do more than make a well-intentioned but vague pledge. By the summer of 2019, Moynihan and others put forth the idea of creating a tool to measure themselves. By the fall, the work was under way, and the Big Four consulting firms--Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC--signed on to define the metrics.

By January 2020, a first consultation draft of the metrics was ready, and enthusiastically received. 

Then the COVID-19 disaster struck. Would the project survive this global crisis? And, more broadly, would the whole idea of stakeholder capitalism die in the COVID crisis? The concept had been embraced by the U.S. Business Roundtable--a major Washington-based lobbying group of U.S. firms-- just months earlier. Now, it was feared, that nascent commitment to stakeholder capitalism could make way for a more realistic approach in companies: save what you can, even if it means laying off employees or cutting off suppliers.

But if anything, the enthusiasm of the companies working on the project increased. "There was a sense that this was really important, especially in the crisis," said Maha Eltobgy, who headed the initiative for the World Economic Forum. In the fall of 2020, the metrics were finalized and publicly released.

Of course, we remain far from our goal of achieving a better global economic system for all. The Stakeholder Capitalism Metrics are just one of many initiatives that are needed to get to such an outcome--and time is quickly running out. But in a world where pessimism is increasingly the order of the day, and narrow and short-term self-interest is still alluring, initiatives like these demonstrate that a more inclusive and sustainable model is possible. It is up to us to replicate and follow such an approach. When that happens, those who follow the path of stakeholder capitalism will soon find that it leads to a more inclusive and sustainable economy for all.

This essay was adapted from his book Stakeholder Capitalism, to be published in the U.S. by Wiley in January 2021

------

Thanks, John B!

Related- Davos Launches Reset on Back of COVID

NOTE---

 8 predictions for the world in 2030 from the World Economic Forum

1.  You'll own NOTHING and you'll be happy; whatever you "want" (if deemed necessary by your overlords) -- you will rent and it will e delivered by drone

 2. The US won't be the world's leading superpower; a handful of countries will dominate (pre-selected by the overlords decades in advance) 

3. You won't die waiting for an organ donor; we (whichever satanists they are) won't transplant organs; we'll print new ones instead 

4. You will eat much less (real) meat (because they destroyed all the good producers); an occasional treat not a staple for the good of the environment (they don't like cow farts) and our health (Lies) 

5. A billion people will be displaced by climate change; we'll have to do a better job at welcoming and integrating refugees (creative destruction; planned chaos) 

6. Polluters will have to pay to emit carbon dioxide (guess who will keep all these extorted funds?) There will be a global price on carbon.  This will help make fossil fuels history.  Pay to Pay - THEY own everything and rent it out to you out of your pathetic UBI (universal basic income) 

7.  You could be preparing to go to Mars (or more like Timbuktu because we can't get through Van Allen radiation belt). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsY7eEQX9-w  

8. Western values will have been tested (aka destroyed) to the breaking point.  Checks and balances that underpin or democracies must not be forgotten  (note: what democracy? you'll be AI vaccinated DNA slaves in 24/7 surveilled stack & pack zombie high rises to either serve lucifer or be eliminated - latter being better)