Direct Link to Latest News

Below- The Insanity of Opening a Restaurant (scroll down)

Green Movements are all Illuminati Psyops

May 23, 2019


(Left) "Extinction event protestors" stop traffic in City of London

School Strikes - Children Crusade against Climate Change  

25,000 SPECIES IN DANGER OF DISAPPEARING (due to weather change)

Climate change hysteria, the Green Party, environmentalism and conservation are all Illuminati sponsored. They are different aspects of the one per cent wanting to preserve the planet for their enjoyment and exploitation from useless eaters like you and me. 

This 1995 article exposes the elaborate efforts the Illuminati devote to

making sure deplorables don't survive or prosper at the expense of the people who own the planet.  

"Conservation was born when sport hunters initially wanted to stop other hunters killing "their" game. These other hunters were largely tribal people or poor colonists after meat or skins to eat, use or sell. In contrast, rich hunters weren't shooting for the pot, even when they ate their prey. Their prize was the "fair chase," backed up with a souvenir head, horns, or stuffed animal." 

Prince Philip's Green Order of Battle

 by Jeffrey Steinberg 


At the Gland, Switzerland headquarters shared by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Prince Philip's transnational "green" insurgents reportedly maintain a war room to track the deployments of their international legions. 

In some parts of the world, like Africa, these operations are predominantly covert military operations, staged out of the vast infrastructure of game preserves, national parks, and nature reserves that they administer. 

But in the United States, western Europe and other "First World" areas, where the conditions have not yet been set for such blatant and genocidal "military" actions, the WWF runs a broad front of ostensibly independent operations aimed at "softening" the targeted nation-states for eventual slaughter. 

Figure 1 (see pdf) is not an official WWF-IUCN document. It is a reconstruction of their actual irregular warfare order of battle, drawn from thousands of pages of documentation, eyewitness accounts, and other investigative efforts. 


Ultimately, all the decision-making power in the green insurgency rests with the Club of the Isles, the London-centred apparatus of oligarchic power over which the House of Windsor presides as the delegated primus inter pares. 

However, the operational deployments are set through a vast, highly coordinated structure of private agencies, most of which were established during the post-World War II period. At this level, Prince Philip and his longtime ally Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands maintain a working overview of the apparatus' deployment. 

Well over $15 billion a year is budgeted for this green insurgency against western civilization, with the principal financing administered by the 1001 Nature Trust, by an infrastructure of over 1,000 tax-exempt charitable trusts in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere, and through covert corporate financing. 

The leading corporations sponsoring Prince Philip's army are all owned or controlled by the Club of the Isles. The role of the Royal Dutch Shell Corp. in bankrolling Greenpeace, the "New Age" Global Business Network, etc., is perhaps the most glaring case of Club 38 Feature corporate largesse fueling outright green terrorism. 


Along with the WWF-IUCN-ln Club command centre and its funding conduits, the upper levels include an extensive legal apparatus, a number of well-heeled think tanks, and key agencies of the United Nations. Unesco, the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), and the United Nations Development Program (UlNDP) are all private fiefdoms of the WWF-IUCN, created and staffed by leading figures from Prince Philip's inner circle. 'Citizens above suspicion' As a buffer between Prince Phillip, the Club of the Isles, and the terrorist underground, the World Wide Fund for Nature and IUCN maintain a large number of "respectable organizations" manned by "citizens above suspicion." 

Some of these conservation groups predate the founding of the WWF (1961) and IUCN (1947). The Audubon Society was created in 1905; the Wilderness Society in 1935; the Sierra Club in 1892. Yet, it was top officials of the Wilderness Society and the Sierra Club who overtly hired and bankrolled Earth First! founder David! Foreman to launch that terrorist gang. Others "respectables" were created as direct projects of WWF-IUCN-Club of the Isles apparatus, like the Environmental Defense Fund, the Conservation International, and the Natural Resources Defense Council.

One step below these "respectable organizations" is an even larger apparatus of radical groups, which serve as the recruiting ground and support apparatus for the terrorists. The cases of Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth have been documented elsewhere in this Feature. At this "radical" level, there is often open coordination with the hard-core terrorists. The recent demonstration against the logging industry shown on the cover of this issue in a typical instance where "radical" groups launch actions that are then endorsed by the hard-core terrorist network. 

The targeting by the radicals often results in acts of terrorism and sabotage by the underground gangs; however, the "radicals" are able to "plausibly deny" any direct role in the violence. At the level of the proto-terrorist and terrorist groups, differences are often less clear cut. Among the animal liberation networks, it is widely believed that groups like the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) maintain secret cells that carry out terrorist actions and claim credit for them on behalf of otherwise non-existent groups like the Animal Liberation Front or the Animal Avengers. 

Recently. a new hard-core terrorist group, Earth Liberation Front, modelled on the ALF, has become active in Europe. The success of this vast terrorist infrastructure can be at least partially attributed to the fact that no one has previously "cracked" the command structure/support apparatus. The most efficient way to eliminate this growing terrorist menace is by dismantling it from the top down!

EIR Volume 22, Number 3, January 13, 1995 © 1995 EIR News Service Inc. All Rights Reserved. 

Thanks to Paul for sending this 

Note - Before becoming Justine Castro's principal advisor, Gerald Butts was head of the WWF Canada. 

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

You can find this article permanently at .html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Green Movements are all Illuminati Psyops "

Thomas A said (May 23, 2019):

The quotation before the article starts reminds me of the kings of old. All the game belonged to the king and no one could hunt without the king’s permission. Thus, his noblemen and favorites could hunt, but the serfs and everyone else could not. Hence, today a license is required to hunt. We have not advanced very far have with.

JG said (May 23, 2019):

Washington has to shut off all these erroneous anarchy rooted organizations that operate under the guise of fictitious names like these. They shouldn't be allowed within 100 square miles of the halls of Congress or the Office of the Presidency. They have no constitutional right to plot the future or change laws that take away the power and sovereignty of the American public.
The American Constitution was never designed to become a special interest democracy to override the will of the majority of its citizens.
This is all part of the war on the constitutional nation states. It's subversion from and by alien entities that are hostile to the desires and will of the ruling and residing majority.
Another trivial bill was passed by Congress last Friday which the MSM silently and intentionally gave no attention to. It basically protects all different forms of self contrived sexual identity under the umbrella of existing civil rights laws. This was and is not the will of the American people. This is the will of the .001 per cent of the population if that. No one really cares what these "ITS" do or think behind closed doors. And, this is why they want to make it an " in your face" law. They hope it will give honour and dignity to the undignified. It won't pass the Senate but to even consider it is beyond the realm of all conventional and non-conventional wisdom. It's insanity on steroids at best.

Until we have some "profiles in courage" by our elected officials in Washington America's identity will be lost under their watch.

Below- Feminism Tricked Women Into Giving Up their Power (scroll down)

The Insanity of Opening a Restaurant

May 22, 2019

I suffer from RCS (Restaurateur Compassion Syndrome)

I can't help but notice if a restaurant is empty. 
I feel the helplessness and anxiety of the owner 
as he contemplates the hourly payroll. 
Certain restaurants are on my deathwatch.
I silently pray for them but am relieved when 
they go to a `better place. I don't eat out 
very often, not because of the food. 
I object to their business model.

(See below- Response from restaurateurs who thank me for this free therapy. ) 

(Updated from April 15, 2018)
by Henry Makow PhD.

If I were starting out in life again, I would become a psychologist instead of a writer.

I would specialize in the peculiar mental derangement that causes people to open a restaurant. This mania infects thousands.

Approximately 60% of restaurants fail within three years.  And no wonder. There are tons of restaurants competing for business. 

Indeed, restaurants compete with everyone who has a kitchen and a cookbook, which is almost everyone.

My cooking is as good as most restaurants. They advertise "home cooking." Why not eat at home? One of my great pleasures in life, for which I am grateful, is being able to indulge my changing appetite.  Appetite is the body's way of telling you what it needs. 

When I consider the cost of food, equipment, furnishings, rent, advertising, labor, taxes, utilities, etc. I can't understand how restaurants survive. When I eat out, I am conscious that the owner's profit is the difference between what I pay and all of these items. No wonder I often feel ripped off in terms of quality and quantity. (My advice is to charge a bit more and provide generous portions.) 

For me, opening a restaurant would be like renting, furnishing and staffing a reading room where people buy my books and then sit down and enjoy them. I would go broke.

Never sell anything that can't be mass produced. Once I've finished a book, it's done. But a restaurant must manufacture its product anew every time, to exacting standards or face the indignation of the customer and a scathing online review. 

Not just one product, there are dozens on a menu! You are at the mercy of your cooks.

Did I mention the hard work and long hours? The city health inspectors? How just one bad review can spoil your business? How food goes bad? Imagine if someone gets food poisoning?

When I'm one of only a few customers, I feel the owner's anxiety. 

Yet nothing can stop this open-a-restaurant lunacy. In Montreal, they had to pass a law restricting their number. 

What's so great about cooking for strangers? They are rarely grateful. 

My sister owns a successful restaurant. The margin is 5%. You must do a lot of business for that to pay. My brother-in-law says it's like preparing to give a concert every night, and not knowing if anyone will show up.

I've noticed that successful restaurants serve a niche. They give people what they already eat, only better. The market for people curious about Eritrean food is limited.

What inspires people to get into this labor of love? 

Throw a dinner party and get it out of your system! At least the customers are your friends and you won't go broke!

Ok, I confess I will still eat at restaurants because I like to get out. In my dotage, the quest for food perfection, like finding the best cigar, hamburger, gyro or coffee gives life challenge. So buy a drink and leave a generous tip for the selfless souls who sacrifice their mental and financial stability for you. 

---------- Restaurant Owners- What I wish I had Known! 


Comment from PJ:

I was born into the restaurant business. For 40 years my family has managed to control this beast of a career. I know all about the missed holidays, the horrible hours, the late nights, and the crazy staff members. I'm not here to crush anyone's dream about owning a restaurant but this business isn't for anyone normal...You have to be a little insane. It takes lots of money, passion, determination and grit just to get through a lunch rush. Employees calling in and training someone to cook is a whole new level of hell. Every day I ask myself how in the F did I end up doing this?? I've got a degree from college and I've landed a career that isn't much respected. Yes, I'm the boss, but I'm more of an employee. The money is decent and I've got bills so....I'm stuck. Ahh, it just feels good to vent and read what others have written. Good luck to everyone. You'll need it eventually.

Comment from AQ:

it's midnight and I just finished reading your article about the restaurant business.
well, I have opened a pizza joint with Mediterranean food five years ago and now I'm closing doors after i have depleted my savings trying to revive it. I am surrounded by big-name corporations, papa jones, pizza hut, dominos and the likes. they have been crushing since I opened; it is a war, they have guns and tanks and I have knives and sticks. guess who is winning. I entered the restaurant business because I  Iike to cook.

and now I have no choice but to close doors. I'm by myself by the way and I don't deliver pizza.

but taxes, licenses, insurance, dumpster fees, health inspectors and the rising food cost are killing me. just yesterday I had to pay the sanitation department $950.00 for grease trap fees alone or they were going to shut off my water.  had to borrow half of the money from my son. he did not ask for collateral by the way.
anyway, I'm finished, saddened, and old with no skill and nobody would hire me.
I guess i'll deliver for papa jones.

thanks, Henry for hastening my decision and helping me cut down my losses.
by the way on the same street, there are little caesars, papa jones, pizza hut, dominos, and 2 other locally - owned joints.
well i'd better get some sleep and figure out a way to store my stuff until I sell it.
good night

CR writes:

I wish I had read this article 15 years ago.  I went to cooking school with hopes to one day open my own restaurant, if only I had known what I was getting myself into.  Needless to say, I never opened a restaurant.  Little did I realize that here in Ottawa to open a simple restaurant with 20 seats or so would cost around $250,000 and no bank will give you a loan because of the excessively high risk.  Unless you or your business partners have the money you will need to find private investors, which is not easy at all. 
Most people who open a restaurant are motivated by the fact that they "like cooking" and think it will be "fun".  Anyone who has ever worked in a restaurant can tell you that there is very little about it that is fun or to be liked.  I enjoy cooking at home, but a restaurant environment is something completely different.  When it's busy, you are under constant stress.  When it's not busy, you are either stuck scraping some grease in the corner or you are going home.  It's a business in which employee's rights are rarely recognized - no overtime pay, no holiday pay, no breaks (even though they deduct money for them), no chance to eat even though you are working with food all day long.  

Not all restaurants are equally bad, but these are regular things to expect. The next thing is wages - although minimum wage (in Ontario) has gone up by nearly $4 in the last few years, the average restaurant wages have barely increased.  When I look at job ads they are offering the same wages I was making in 2008.  In most restaurants, there are maybe one or two people (chef and sous-chef) who get a decent salary, but often they are working 60-80 hours a week for no extra pay over what they would have made for 40 hours.  There are few cooks and waiters over 35 years old, most are single and childless, many have drinking and/or drug problems.  You wonder why.  Those who have their heads on somewhat straight are often motivated by a misguided sense of pride, "look at me, I'm a cook in a fancy restaurant but I live in my mom's basement".  Currently, I cook for a nursing home and also as a personal trainer.  Nursing homes are far from glamorous, but the hourly wage is a lot more than what most restaurant cooks make.
On a side note, I try to avoid eating from restaurants as much as possible.  After seeing what goes on in there I don't want to take the risk.  "What?  There's no time to wash your hands!",  "Just pick it up off the floor, we can't throw out steaks", "No need to wash the lettuce, there's black pepper in the salad dressing, nobody will know the difference".  These are not imaginary stories.  Speaking of lettuce, most restaurants I have worked in use the same sink to wash lettuce (the ones that actually do) and dump the water from the mop bucket.  Is salad really a healthy option?  If you are hungry and don't have time to cook you are better grabbing a burger at McDonald's or something like that, it's greasy and doesn't taste so great but you won't spend the night on the toilet.  If you are worried about your weight then skip the fries and soft drink, eat some fruit when you get home instead.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "The Insanity of Opening a Restaurant "

Gerry said (May 23, 2019):

Guess what popped up in the local newspaper, The Province, but a story headlined, ‘It’s been a pleasure’ Jamie Oliver’s bankrupt restaurant empire marinated in red ink.

LOL, not even celebrities can catch a break and why any celebrity would want to open a restaurant is beyond me. Jamie however, won’t be suffering with apparently a 400 - million fortune?

And as much as I understand his bankruptcy I’m still trying to get over the news in same paper of rents for a 2 bedroom apartment going for 3000 dollars a month here in Vancouver? Tell me really who can afford such and imagine this isn’t commercial? This whole sticking shite is going to collapse and sooner than anyone realizes!

David C said (May 22, 2019):

I moved to Portland (OR) to attend the Western Culinary Institute, because I always loved cooking, and thought it would be a good career for me.

After I got a job working in a resteraunt for awhile, however, that changed my mind. Cooking for other people, using set recipes, took all the fun out of it, plus it's hard work. Executive chefs at expensive restaurants make good money, but they also work their butts off, and those jobs are very difficult to get.

I rarely eat out anymore, but prefer an open kitchen when I do. It's fun watching the food get prepared, and you can appreciate how hard they work. We have many "pod" food businesses now, clusters of food pods, which offer a variety of options, which seems to be a phenomena in most large cities.

Unfortunately the food usually isn't very good, but usually not bad either. I like restaurants that offer recipes I don't usually cook myself, and we have plenty of variety here in Portland, possibly the highest proportion of restaurants per capita. Then too we have some food businesses that are thriving, for reasons I can't fathom. "Voodoo Donuts" (supposedly owned by pedophiles) often has huge lines outside, like it's a social scene to wait in line for designer donuts here now - wtf?

I enjoy cooking for my dog now, who eats the same food as me, except he gets some meat I wouldn't eat, and raw bones. Cooking for your dog or cat is actually less expensive, and much healthier for them, plus it saves on vet bills. I've developed a repetroir of doggie dishes, approved by Renji-sama, my faithful service dog, spirit guide, guardian angel, and doggie jitsu master. I'm considering making a website specializing in cooking for dogs and cats, because the food in pet stores is getting VERY expensive, and it's mostly low-quality food. Our beloved fur babies deserve to eat the same quality food as their service humans eat. Food is the most important medicine! "Let food be thy medicine, and medicine be thy food" ~ Hippocrates (father of holistic medicine).

Paul said (May 22, 2019):

The main reason I don't go to restaurants is that as a minimum-wage earner, I'm not going to tip a server (and there goes my refills). So I go to the counters such as Subway, Tim Horton's, McDonalds, etc. I hate it though because I'm supporting big companies that get massive tax breaks but I can trust the portions and the hours and most of those that work in chain restaurants get benefits that match other corporate places. I honestly don't know how independent restaurants do it but the following are reasons that people do get into the restaurant business:

1) In owning one's own business there are tax breaks people can take advantage of.

2) One can be creative on many different levels.

3) The compliments one can receive for good service and presentation can be rewarding.

4) If they cater to the niche they themselves are a part of, the owners now are surrounded by a group of friends.

5) On the off-chance something clicks, millions might be made.

That said, restaurants are hellholes and only the insane last but are often lifelong addicts of one kind or another.

When I was young I worked in restaurants because they reinforced my view that life was totally out of control. Now I avoid working in them or giving them my money.

Chad said (May 22, 2019):

I would definitely eat out more, if more restaurants had organic and non-GMO selections. That’s unfortunately, unfeasible for most establishments, given the cost of these foods.

John said (April 6, 2018):

Been eating at particular restaurant for more than 17 years plus in South Bay and surrounded by four hotels they have always been busy for breakfast and lunch meals. Have seen plenty of waitresses come and go. They even have another restaurant just north several miles with same the menu. The problem with Diner's is they have the same thing repeatedly as pointed out in this article. I particularly target restaurant for one or two items on the menu and that is it and do the same for the rest of eateries that are visited. In the end you have to eat somewhere beside at home. Occasionally, food poisoning issues occur. It is thankless job at times but someone has to do.

Robert K said (April 5, 2018):

Overall only one in ten businesses survive ten years. They are fighting an economic environment designed by puritanical economists according to the principle that economics is the study of “the use of scarce resources”. And the primary resource in short supply is non-debt money—a situation that drives people into the thrall of banker-created debt.

Imagine the waste involved in the effort to build viable businesses in an inherently adverse financial environment. Sisyphus would understand!

M said (April 5, 2018):

This is why Chinese restaurants employ their entire family and keep slaves (either other Asians or illegal Mexicans) in the kitchens and pay off health inspectors. They grew up in a communist county and know how the corrupt 'system' works.

It's the same in the USA and "Immigration" or whatever they call them now usually turn a blind eye due to kickbacks. It's almost impossible for an independent restauranteur to "play by the rules" and survive. If you don't bribe the health inspector and every other government leech, you won't last long.

Duane said (April 5, 2018):

The only thing MORE dumb than opening a restaurant is FREQUENTING them....

Below - Alabama- White Men Save the World Again (Scroll down)

Feminism Tricked Women Into Giving Up Their Power

May 21, 2019

BROWN-OBIT-popup.jpg(l. Cosmo Editor Helen Gurley Brown in her office in 1965)

Women want love, marriage and family. 

Men want Sex.

Before second-wave feminism, the watchword for
women was "No sex before marriage."  

Feminists like Brown duped women into giving
sex in exchange for NOTHING. Thanks partly to her, 

She deprived women of their honoured natural and social roles
as wives and mothers. Feminism pretended to empower women 
while doing exactly the opposite.

"For every genuine case of men sexually harassing women, there are probably ten cases of women using sex for advancement. Helen Gurley Brown made that strategy explicit." -Reader

Cosmo Editor Helen Gurley Brown, (1922-2012) was called "champion of the single girl".  She taught them to sell their bodies rather than demand love, courtship and marriage first. She was an Illuminati social engineer, a satanist whore who made prostitution seem chic.  

 In her autobiography, "I'm Wild Again" (2000) she tells us right away that in 1941, at age 19 she joined an "escort service" and had sex with a 50-year-old man for $5 (worth $80 today.) Page 4  She also boasted she slept with 178 men before her marriage. 

Illuminati Taught Young Women to Trade in Sex
From Aug. 14, 2012
By Henry Makow Ph.D.

In 1965, Helen Gurley Brown, the editor of Cosmopolitan, said that a housewife was "a parasite, a dependent, a scrounger, a sponge or a bum." She didn't call them whores because she respects whores.

Her sister-in-arms, Betty Friedan, compared homemakers to "concentration camp inmates" because of the lack of stimulation and opportunity for advancement in concentration camps. (The Feminine Mystique, p. 306)

These mid boggling attacks typify the vicious psychological war against society by Illuminati Satanists. Their program to degrade women, destroy families, arrest heterosexual development, create dysfunction and reduce population has been devastatingly successful.

"The scale of marital breakdown in the West since 1960 has no historical precedent," says historian Lawrence Stone. In 40 short years, the marriage rate is down by one third, the divorce rate has doubled, the birth rate is one half, and single-parent families per capita have tripled. Forty per cent of all children born in the US in 2007 were out of wedlock compared to 4% in 1957. (Bennett, The Broken Hearth, p.10)

In 1952, the Rockefellers controlled $250 million dollars of media advertising annually. They hyped Helen Gurley Brown's 1962 book, "Sex and the Single Girl" and the movie. Single women were told they should have career and sex instead of family. At the same time, the Rockefellers were also funding and lobbying for population control and eugenics.

As editor of Cosmopolitan (1965-97), Brown was a role model for career women the world over (36 foreign editions.) She married her manager at age 37 and remained childless. Along with Communist activist Betty Frieden, and CIA agent Gloria Steinem, Brown belongs to the triumvirate of modern feminist social engineers. When she died, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said, "New York City lost a pioneer who reshaped not only the entire media industry, but the nation's culture. She was a role model for the millions of women whose private thoughts, wonders and dreams she addressed so brilliantly in print."

cos-ashley-greene-cosmo-cover-mdn-37543620.jpg(left, every issue is a HO issue)


Brown respects whores because prostitution is her program for women. In her autobiography, "I'm Wild Again" (2000) she tells us right away that in 1941, at age 19 she joined an "escort service" and made out with a 50-year-old man for $5 ($80 today.)

"Why wasn't I revolted? I was a little but not utterly. I think even then I was a practising realist... I tried to do whatever you needed to do to survive." (4)

She got a secretarial job on the understanding that she would sleep with her married boss and he would "take care" of her in return. This arrangement lasted for a few years. She describes the routine:

"After cocktail hour we did go to my flat to make love. The lovemaking? ...This was two people copulating -- he seemed to have a good time...Moi learned to fake often and well." (15)

Brown's excuse is that she was a helping a mother and invalid sister back in Arkansas. (Prostitutes generally don't come from wealth.)

Her only regret: she never really got the promised financial payoff: "I needed somebody to tell me how to treat a man in this situation, how to flatter and cuddle and coo. I should have done it better." (19)

Helen Gurley Brown became that tutor. She taught women how to parlay sex appeal into profit and control. She helped to transform feminine nature from love and devotion to calculated predation.


(At home with husband, producer David Brown)

Here is how she got her husband to marry her.

"You get the hook in. The darling, charming, delicious, sexy you has to have sunk into him so seriously; the hook [is] buried so deep he can't get it out without severe pain, i.e. can't live without you. You then close in and deliver your ultimatum. I had to deliver mine twice."(27)

While Brown claims she was loyal, she thinks adultery is just fine. The man's wife is to blame if he strays. Sex, Brown says, "is a physical feeling" "it feels good... one of the best things we have...." not to be subjected to "a moral imperative."

Suffocating a sexual urge can lead to "twitches, tension or depression" and driving "off a cliff some night." (52) But, like a practised madam, she cautions "never sleep with someone who has less money or more troubles than you." (225)

Office romances and even sleeping with the boss is just fine as long as you're discreet. (107) She tells her readers to make the boss "look good," let him take credit for their work, and don't complain about putting in extra hours.

Feminism, it seems, has removed wives and mothers from their families, and put them to work for corporations. Instead of serving husbands and children who love them, women now obey bosses who pay for their services and fire them in a downturn.

In Brown's view, if a loving husband provides for a devoted wife, she is a "parasite." But if she is a corporate slave or whore, then she is "independent" and "liberated."

This quote from the review of a new biography reiterates her contempt for marriage and family: "When "Sex and the Single Girl" came out in the early 1960s, the most shocking thing ... was Brown's matter-of-fact attitude toward affairs with married men."

Feminism is an excuse to sell yourself:

"...she recommended that her readers take advantage of the situation, milking a guilty and grateful married lover for gifts, money and workplace advancement, which Brown regarded as fair recompense for the fact that men got paid more than women and kept the best jobs for themselves."


The message that sexual urges were not to be denied, that promiscuity was "cool" and "modern," was instilled in women to degrade them and undermine marriage. The state is intended to replace the family.

In reality, women achieve fulfilment through self-sacrifice. It is a vicious slander to portray devoted hardworking wives and mothers as "bums" and "parasites."

The assumption that only work performed for cash (state/economy) is of value is sick. They want to denigrate the personal and spiritual realm, the private life of the family and the effort that this entails.

Brown says, "Whenever you live through someone else, they want someone else." This is simply not true. We love mom because she put us ahead of becoming the top producer at Century 21. Love is self-sacrifice.

Beyond a certain point, worldly ambition in a woman is masculine and impersonal. America is full of bitter neutered women and befuddled emasculated men.

The only question remaining, Was she Jewish? This is unclear, but she married a Jew and perfectly advanced the Masonic Jewish agenda.

Jews definitely mourned her passing.  If she wasn't an Illuminati Jew by birth, she was in every other respect. She did more than most to fulfil a primary goal of Communism- destroy the nuclear family. 


Related - Helen Gurley Brown - Returning to the Feminine

Sheryl Sandberg thinks #MeToo hasn't gone far enough 

Read About Women's Magazines in "How the Rockefellers Re-Engineered Women"

Germany Coerces Woman to be a Prostitute

Heroine or Whore? Daily Telegraph -The Cosmo Girl who Changed the World (for the worse)

Vision of Women "Screwed Up"

First Comment from G

"The source of women's power was making marriage a condition for sex."  Henry, that's one of the most profound things you ever wrote.  Someone reading it on the surface may at first think it's simply about accruing a commitment and stabilizing one's security, which is fine in itself.  But other levels that move into deeper wisdom speak of the assurance of fulfilling one's purpose in life:  to partner in being fruitful, and to be fulfilled in carrying on the human race.  What could be more empowering than being aligned with one's life purpose?  Of course, all of this is made more real and beautifully enhanced when love is at the core.  May the debauchery die soon, and I certainly hope it's not too late to rescue the women back to sanity.  

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Feminism Tricked Women Into Giving Up Their Power "

Carleton said (May 22, 2019):

Have been reading your essays (and just finished “Illuminati: The Cult That Hijacked The World") for a while now, but found your recent “Feminism Tricked Women Into Giving Up Their Power” to be one of the most bone-chilling and truthful summations of the current state of affairs regarding marriage and the family that I’ve yet read. Truly depressing, but exactly the fact of the matter now.

As a Christian who has a certain degree of wisdom and understanding of this issue, I lay the blame for this ruinous state of marital affairs squarely on the Church, which is to say the Body of Believers in the Lord Jesus Christ. What?! How can I say such a thing? Easily. When the Church just stood back and allowed treasonous governmental heathen to lawlessly enact “laws” that stripped the headship of the man as being the head of the family, —meaning so-called “statutes” governing marriage; divorce; the status of who has authority over the children; and naturally who owns what under the legal fiction called “community property” within marriage— it was guaranteed then that marriage would be completely destroyed, which is exactly what has been accomplished. As such, it should be no surprise that evil filth like a Helen Gurley Brown, Betty Friedan, etc., would then subsequently materialize to push that destruction right along.

It can easily be viewed now that the respective efforts of Hugh Hefner and Helen Gurley Brown merely constituted two sides of the same wicked coin.

Thank you for your excellent work. I only hope that yours and the work of others like you will prove to be enough.

JJ said (May 22, 2019):

Many truths escape the notice of stupid feminists including the obvious one right at the beginning of this whole charade. Feminists cried foul because a bunch of men were outside of their homes having loads of fun committing adultery - so now it was their turn. Do not feminists understand that for every man committing adultery there was also a woman, often a secretary? And that those women were pathetic, depressed, nonfunctioning women not to be envied and that the men were also to be pitied? What feminism basically did was double the amount of female adulterers so now it was 2/1 women to men.

Over and over again I have entered into a conversation with a woman who is divorced assuming that the man was the sex-hungry pig who broke down the fence and ran away only to discover that it was the woman who wanted sexual freedom - not the man. And over and over again I've spoken with men who wanted a home but the woman insisted on making her own money and her own decisions and ruining the unity of the marriage.

Feminists always complain that men are not committed to loving them unconditionally but why is a man supposed to simply just love and not ask for anything in return including cooperation and submission? Is a man supposed to follow a woman all over the countryside while she fulfills her career dreams and parties with the gals every weekend?

What also escapes the notice of stupid feminists is that many a righteous woman has put her foot down and said to a man that he chose either the bar scene or her scene and he chose her!

Pedro said (May 22, 2019):

Jew or not Jew? I don't know but in 5 minutes following her paternal line I got through the Norris's to the Norreys and Le Norey's, who "are thought to have come to England shortly after the Norman invasions". In the Miles Mathis school, that means Jewish.

I'd bet what little I have of a farm that she was of 'noble' birth and fulfilling her role as whore (Shiksa) maker same as Margaret Mead was making out that the virgin inclined girls of the Samoas were all whoring it out on the beach with the boys, which they were not, and Meade herself was.*

Ita Buttrose , Cleo founder and currently head of the ABC, was the Australian equivalent. I gather that was not her real name. ahh, I see her mother was Rosenthal. Father line had changed their name from Butter. Not a bad landing for one of the 0.4% of the population


(mind you the commenter there has Mead as a he, but that is understandable - Gilad Atzmon's definition of a Jewish Mother - just like a Jewish father, but with balls). If not Jewish then working on their long term project and more often than not marrying them as professional collaborators.

LT said (February 11, 2018):

I really enjoyed the article on Helen Gurley-Brown. I grew up on Cosmopolitan magazine. Subscribed to Ms. Magazine at age 14, and quite frankly did not like men!

What a travesty! She was a bad woman. Teaching us all to be sluts. Thank God I did not go the slut route, but I was really, really angry at men! Ruined a lot of my relationships upon reflection.
I cannot believe I survived the 70's and 80s.

I feel very duped to be honest. I fell for the Communist b.s. I was only 13 when I started to dislike men.

I remember being in my dear grandmother's kitchen in England. I was a girl at the tender age of 11. She taught me a lot about cooking. She said to me, "so now you know how to make your future husband a good cooked dinner". My reply: "he can make his own damn dinner!"

It makes me sad Henry. So sad.

TWH said (February 9, 2018):

I used to see this when I worked for a major Canadian bank. Women would use their feminine features to get ahead in the company. If you didn't have something said women needed, they essentially ignored you (except to perhaps gossip about you).

This is something that I see in greater society a lot now. Women around my area of the country look for two things first and foremost. They try to latch onto men who either have good looks or the appearance of wealth or influence (usually an expensive car). All else is far down the list. Because of this, I haven't trusted women for a long time and I generally don't engage them (while still keeping a watchful eye on their manipulative antics). When they're not deploying their sexuality in an attempt to use you, they're gossiping about you and trying to destroy your career or some other aspect of your life.

I'm a man and, as such, can stand alone quite well without some modern-day Jezebel trying to toss a wrench into the works. Who needs the aggravation for the sake of an orgasm? I'm not some overgrown adolescent like the majority of men seem to be, who thinks he needs a woman. Let's be clear. Sex is not one of our vital needs in life, despite what the mass media pushes onto us.

I'll even go so far as to say I think far fewer women should be in the workforce. Most of them just turn office environments into a soap opera set while emasculated men play right along and even adopt some of the reprehensible behavior.

Diane said (February 9, 2018):

I love the Helen Gurley Brown article. Nothing is sadder than going to my old workplace and seeing all the girls who came to work so fresh and pretty in their 20s, now in their late 30s or early 40s, past their prime and having lost their luster of youth. Not married. No kids. So sad. That was me but I was lucky enough to still get married and have kids. My mission is to try to warn young women about the perils of Feminism--it only benefits men.

I hope you are doing well. Thanks for being a source of light in a troubling world.

Robert said (August 15, 2012):

Brown effectively became a prostitute because "I tried to do whatever you needed to do to survive,"
and she seems to want to convey this message to other women.

The scandal is that people are still in a position of having to "sell themselves" in diverse ways in order to "survive" in the midst of the greatest potential for producing material wealth ever known. We are now in a position where most of the repetitive work, and even much of the creativity, can be consigned to robots.

The result is not that freedom and leisure fill our lives, but instead that poverty and insecurity increase to keep us submissive to the dictates of an elite class.

If ever there was proof that a diabolical power has its grip on the throat of humanity, it is provided by the fact that people are denied participation by right in the abundance naturally accruing from technology (a common heritage) applied to natural resources (a common property). The choke point is the monopolistic financial system.

If we took seriously Jesus's commandment to love one another, rather than heeding those who would have us hate each other, then we would have hope of reconfiguring this corrupting system, to throw off the chains of illusion and "release reality".

Greek Play from 400 BC Tells How Women Threatened Civilization

May 19, 2019

How Women are Used by Satanists (Communists) to Undermine Civilization- A 2400-Year-Old Story

(Thanks to Mike Stone) 

Notre Dame Fire- Did they use a direct energy weapon?

May 14, 2019


Did they use a direct energy weapon? 

by Fleeting Shadow

It's quite possible that the really-hard-to-burn, robust, hard-as-rocks, petrified oak, 800-year-old Notre Dame cathedral roofing frame was set ablaze by a real burst from a D.E.W.-weaponized anti-gravity platform. Watch the video of a probable suspect (Click on to the link to the first video in the comments section near the bottom of this article: 

Then watch said suspect being put through its paces in different places around the world, and then demolishing, War of the Worlds style, ground targets with its energy beam cannon under the fog of war in well-known theaters of war, like Iraq, Syria and Afganistan, in the 2nd video in the same part of the comments section.

Unlike saucer and cigar-shaped U.F.O.'s, where the entire energized surface emits a coronal glow from its charged ionized energy field, this triangular craft only glows from 4 separated orbs on the craft's underside: one at each of its 3 points and one in the middle. Its shape suggests that the ones running the program are using the delta wing stealth Air Force jets as cover for them. "You didn't see a gravity-defying U.F.O.. What you saw was just the latest B-2 delta wing Stealth Bomber."

So, now the question of whether we should be scared, lest the Russians or Chinese have better fighter jets, bombers, missiles or nukes then us is a totally irrelevant no-brainer.

Same old, same old. Think the pulverizing of the W.T.C. to dust on 9-11 by a D.E.W. (and the pulverizing of the skyscraper from a particle beam fired from an alien U.F.O. in the predictive programming movie, 'Independence Day') and the California wildfires and all the acts of weather warfare and psychotronic mind control on the public.

See and for more on the Notre Dame Cathedral arson. They turned the cathedral roof into a heavenward-directed burning cross (which went up all along the roof's length all at once). Talk about giving God the finger!

I've been hearing the strange, deep-throated, years-long humming sounds droning on and on again just this morning where I live in Queen's Land after a break of many months. I've been told on good authority, that these are E.M.P. tests on the public. Search: "Strange humming sounds worldwide.". It's anyone's guess the effects it's having on the people and environment. Like Alan Watt often says, "When you are bringing the world through the biggest changes in history, you would use all the weapons in your arsenal."

The Nipsey Hussle hussle by GL

May 1, 2019

The Nipsey Hussle hussle

by GL

Nipsey Hussle was a gangsta rapper (active Crip gang member) whose girlfriend is a hollywood starlet (Lauren London)

Nipsey used his respected status as a gangster to do positive things for Black people, such as invest in his ghetto community & rap positive lyrics to a crowd used to preferring negative messages. 

Nipsey talked like a motivational speaker so everyone who listened to him in interviews was uplifted by him, hence he became beloved & admired.

Nipsey's being a gangster made him cool & dangerous in young minds, so a cool guy rapping positively will be listened to/respected/honored by the bad/cool kids...who need to be uplifted by a voice they don't consider a sissy. 

So Nipsey dying is seen as the government killing off a positive black man!

This traumatizes black people to fear doing positive stuff bcuz Nipsey did positive & was murdered --- which, Chris Darden representing Nipsey's killer makes everyone suspect the govt. assassinated Nipsey ~ bcuz he was a potential "black messiah" that j. edgar hoover warned mustn't be allowed to arise.

but there is MAJOR MASONIC SYMBOLISM SURROUNDING THE LIFE & DEATH OF Nipsey Hussle, which has led some to believe he was his hollywood girlfriend's blood sacrifice (which in order to climb the ladder in Hollywood you're supposedly required to let masons kill someone close to you)

while others believe Nipsey faked his death.. BECAUSE the death camera footage is very shaky and unbelievable. and his own mom seems like a crisis actor!

Nipsey SEEMS to have faked his death, which means he's a fraud who let himself be used by masons to steer his black community in the direction masons want blacks going in, i.e. race-based paranoia & furthering racial division.

Nipsey was only popular in the hip hop community. he was not a big star. so his "death" is primarily a psyop against black people.

My theory is his death will be utilized to unite America's black gangs - who'll be led by illuminati agents to stir up chaos and race wars. Thereafter illuminati will "save America" from these dangerous black gangsters by putting America under martial law and rewriting laws to further take away our freedoms. All the while dividing race against race, which allows illuminati to indefinitely use the various races as pawn-weapons against each other, divide-n-rule for the preservation of illuminati domination over all the worlds peoples.

Ultimately Nipsey let himself be portrayed as a murdered messiah, thus participating in hoodwinking his own people who honored him.