Pornography as Social Engineering, May 1964 - PLAYBOY playmates were "the girl next door." They were not models. They had a wholesome innocence that PLAYBOY destroyed. More than anything, PLAYBOY turned women into sex objects. Its message was that all women were available without marriage.
At age 70, I am starting to appreciate the damage
I did to myself by my youthful addiction to PLAYBOY.
It wasn't called sex addiction then but it was.
PLAYBOY made me see women as sex objects.
That's a cliche but the implications were profound.
When you dehumanize them, you cannot see who they really are.
You cannot relate; you are much less likely to succeed.
We put them on pedestals because
they had the keys to sexual "paradise."
Whenever we want anything more than
to be true to ourselves, we become its slave.
Women don't like slaves.
The Illuminati are responsible for spreading this dysfunction.
They deliberately destabilized male-female relationships
by making us focus on appearance & sex, like homosexuals.
Born from Cabalism (Satanism,) the Illuminati created Communism, which regards women as sexual utilities.
Women have exchanged the loving roles of wife and mother for meaningless careers.
Hugh Hefner was probably a crypto-Jew. Most of the editors were Jews. The PLAYBOY philosophy was the liberal agenda (Communism): sexual permissiveness, feminism, homosexuality and weaponizing racial minorities to undermine social cohesion.
We cannot underestimate the effect PLAYBOY had. Confined to marriage, sexual intercourse was a sacrament that celebrated a loving bond. Now it is just a bodily function. Sexual depravity is the hallmark of satanic possession.
Part 1- PLAYBOY and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
(Revised and updated from Nov. 2001.)
In the rearview mirror, it's now clear porn is used as a form of political and spiritual seduction
I doubt if women were always seen as sex objects. They had to sexualize women. PLAYBOY undressed the "girl next door."
PLAYBOY was presented as advanced thinking. But in retrospect, it was really social engineering. With messianic fervor, PLAYBOY took its message of sexual freedom to the American male who, in the 1950s and 1960s, still consecrated sex for marriage. But the freedom was illusory. PlAYBOY's aim was to undermine marriage and hook men on sex for its own sake.
To do this, they had to prevent them from finding true satisfaction in marriage. In Judith Reisman's words, "Playboy was the first national magazine to exploit college men's fears of women and family commitment. Playboy offered itself as a reliable, comforting substitute for monogamous heterosexual love." ("Soft Porn Plays Hardball," p 47)
After 18 years of marriage, I know that marriage is the most reliable and satisfying venue for sex. Outside of a committed relationship, sex is
At age 11 in 1961, magazine pictures of women showing cleavage or leg had a magical quality for me. Pretty soon, my friends were stealing PLAYBOY from newsstands. I was also tempted.
With some trepidation, I approached my father. In the spirit of the times, ("sex is natural, repression is bad") he bought me a copy. Pretty soon I was a subscriber, in more ways than one.
My father's decision vastly increased my trust and confidence in him. But sex became a religion in my imagination. Sex was something sacred that took place between angelic creatures in secluded garrets. The beautiful buxom centerfolds pasted on the inside of my closet doors filled me with a near-religious awe.
PLAYBOY packaged this religion of sex. There was no interest in real women as flawed human beings. The subjects of love, marriage, children, and aging were ignored or disparaged. There was nothing about true masculinity and femininity. The religion of sex was curiously asexual.
Nevertheless, it took over my subconscious. My erotic dreams often involved PLAYBOY pictures. I can relate, albeit in milder terms, to porn addict "Mike" who wrote on this site that he prefers packaged porn to real sex.
This is the reason so many men, especially prominent Jews, have fallen victim to #MeToo.They don't know how to form a permanent relationship, which is what women want.
REAL WOMEN INVISIBLE
Women who were not beautiful became invisible. I could not take them seriously. My first wife was plain-looking. She had spoken to me twice before we became neighbors at the university library. I had absolutely no recollection.
(left, a measure of my brainwashing to this day, I searched for the attractive
victims of the Montreal massacre as though the others' lives were not worth as much.)
The fixation on physical beauty was psychologically emasculating. How did I approach someone when I was mesmerized by their beauty? Attractive women remained mystical goddesses. I put them on a pedestal. I was too needy. I couldn't see women as vulnerable human beings inside a shiny shell.
I lost touch with my masculine identity, my feelings, and critical faculties. I wanted love but didn't know how to get it.
I was part of the (homo) sexual revolution, part of a generation of sexual fashion victims. Despite the example of my father, I didn't grasp the eternal model of masculinity: A man's backbone is his work, my dad said. He leads and looks after the woman and children he loves. (Love is key here. Satanists hate love.)
Unconsciously, men and women are still looking for this kind of relationship. Feminism is a lesbian philosophy teaching women to usurp the male role. Both sexes are lost. had no identity, goal, or motivation. I spent my time looking for them in social action and eastern religion.
I married the average looking woman because I was NOT obsessively attracted to her. I was tired of being ruled by my desire. She was a feminist with a career, allowing me to pursue my own interests. Eventually, inevitably, I hungered for more.
I fell in love with a beautiful insecure young woman who exploited my idealization by maintaining a facade. I divorced my wife and lived with this woman for six years. For a long time, she infatuated me. My love was totally giving, in the hope of securing her love. Mature love is demanding; she would have responded to that.
My book, "A Long Way to Go for a Date" chronicles my slow and painful emergence from immaturity and arrested development. I am now happily married because I belatedly discovered masculine identity.
I missed the opportunity to have a normal family. I have only one son from my first marriage. The social engineers scored a victory with me, and countless other men like me.
NOW, WE'RE ALL SEX ADDICTS (TO SOME DEGREE)
In normal heterosexuality, sex is reserved for the courtship and procreation stage. With parenthood, sex becomes less important. Thanks to porn, we are being re-engineered to behave like homosexuals, to have anonymous sex, and to never marry or have children.
Instead of families, we have sex. Sex from cradle to grave with multiple partners. Sex. Everywhere you look. All the time. Like many homosexuals, we suffer from arrested development.
Marriage is not having to impress a new person constantly. People are actually looking for love, not sex. Sex is just a facsimile, a way of expressing love. It is empty if there is no love to express.
The habit of grading females in terms of sex appeal is hard to break. There is something exhilarating about a lithe beautiful woman in the prime of life. I rationalize that my DNA is clamoring for a new vehicle. But I am too old to become a father again.
Maybe DNA is our real identity and our "lives" are mere ripples on the waters of eternity.
Beauty is just skin deep. Women, like men, are flawed human beings struggling for a breath of fresh air in our toxic culture.
Related -- "Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution"
"Why All Porn is Gay"
Hollywood Hooked the Young on Porn
Feminism Destroying Institution of Marriage
New First Comment from RV- Hugh Hefner was a Satanist
My ex-girlfriend was working as an admissions counselor at a private vocational school in Los Angeles and she met a woman inquiring about enrolling in a school program. The woman happened to be a former Playboy Playmate and what she told my girlfriend at the time was shocking, yet it isn't. She became Born Again Christian and said that while a Playmate, at the Playboy Mansion, she witnessed satanism. She said that she witnessed black mass and was forced to join in. She said that she witnessed first hand Hugh Hefner and fellow Playmates involved in this. She said that Hugh Hefner was a satanist. It may seem shocking because it's a well-kept secret and I have not read about this anywhere, but it's not shocking either because we know that leaders of industry often are involved in this and have sold their soul to the enemy. So why would Hefner be any different? So it's shocking yet it's not surprising when we know what goes on in this world. My girlfriend did not tell me the former Playmates' name. She promised the woman she would not reveal her name to anyone. The reason they started talking is that my girlfriend at the time was Christian and they started talking about spiritual things and about this woman's time as a Playmate and the time at the mansion. My girlfriend Googled this former Playmate and confirmed she was who she said she was. Sadly I will never know who this Playmate is.
Looking at the origins of today's societal-sexual destruction, it may be that the key satanic move was not pornography itself, but the decades-earlier demolition of classic male-female relationships via the feminist agenda ... which is why the 1950s-60s Hefner etc campaign turned out to be so destructive
In other words, in a healthy, pro-marriage society, some nude images would not have that kind of impact, and society's natural mechanisms would act & immunise against their excesssive promotion for degeneracy
As the feminist juggernaut began to progress - going back to the era of right to vote suffragettes etc, the demands for 'equality' in ways upending human nature -
Women were twisted away from 'giving / being protected' to 'demanding', romance was slowly debased by media into being a mere 'thrill', whilst de-spiritualised men failed to protect a natural social order ... and the game was lost right there
Feminism led to the loss of the sense of 'giving' in marriage, giving all of oneself, 'body & soul' ... marriage became a colder, less romantic, more emotionally sterile 'transaction' ... People in the West now often show little sign that they are even capable of 'love' ... As Henry notes in the article, "Unconsciously, men and women are still looking for this kind of relationship"
It is too easily forgotten that part of the 'fantasy' of p-rn is the total giving of one self to another, and there is a deep longing to experience that ... in a society where 'marriage' is often empty
Amidst mass emotional starvation, the p-rn images are a counterfeit, an illusion of 'giving' ... all the more powerful because people despair of the genuine item
We have had some (modestly) similar images for millennia in the West in statues and art, and it seems that in many centuries they were not corrupting, because society had better foundations
Henry also speaks of his own dabbling with eastern religion along the way to wisdom ... tho I find the answers are all there, in aspects of the eastern traditions neglected or mis-portrayed in the West
In south / east Asian spiritual traditions, there is some amount of nude art imagery right at the core of spiritual activity ... the images are seen as pointing the mind toward marital love and towards God, rather away from the spirit
Devotion to your spouse, sexual unleashing in marriage, is seen as 'yoga', another way to bring yourself to God, a 'spiritual practice'
This is the message of, e.g., the Kama Sutra, or the stone carvings on the Temple of Khajuraho which Muslim invaders never found in the Indian jungle, and so didn't destroy
Westerners who visit the Khajuraho temples in India - covered on the exterior with carvings of life, of which maybe about 15% are playboy-esque, somewhat shockingly so - usually don't get the spiritual purpose & message:
'Your mind thinks of these things, you are human ... God is amid you, even there ... Come inside the temple, and settle yourself spiritually ... Honour your spouse, give totally and receive totally, and realize this is all divine gift ... sex-amidst-loyal-spiritual-love is the ultimate eroticism, and one more way to know the divine'
This addiction got a hold of me too and at a young age. I was 9 and it was the October 1982 issue, Tanya Roberts on the cover. My best friends dad got Playboy and Penthouse and we read them for years. I was a horny little bastard, spanking the monkey non-stop. Then porn later. It's a struggle even to this day but I realize the tremendous amount of harm it does. It's not even about beauty either, it's a sex addiction. Some of the ugliest women are also some of the most amazing at it as well. Another harmful aspect of it is that for whatever reason, demonic spirits are heavily attached to these sinful behaviors. The angels who left their first estate and came to earth according to Enoch was because of their lust for human women. Think about that for a moment. Beings in heaven with God throw all that away, if that isn't a testament to the evil power of lust I don't know what is.