The Feminist Formula for Killing Love
July 25, 2017
A woman's love for a man is expressed as trust. By attacking this trust, feminists kill love.
Masculinity is defined by Power. Femininity is defined by Love. Heterosexual marriage involves the exchange of female worldly power for male power expressed as love. This requires "trust."
I have written on this subject for 15 years but periodically the truth resounds again with greater clarity. If our culture wasn't controlled by Communists (Satanist bankers), my book Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the NWO would be a bestseller. We are being deliberately subverted.
Woman loves a man by surrendering her worldly power and putting her trust in him. Female love is epitomized by trust. If she doesn't trust him, she doesn't love him. This is how two people become one in marriage. A husband "possesses" his wife; this is symbolized and consecrated by the sex act.
Communist bankers use feminism to destroy love, marriage and family. They teach women to seek power instead of surrendering it. This is lesbian since masculinity is defined by power. Women get love by surrendering power. Instead of becoming one, man and woman compete for power.
A constant drumbeat of propaganda (infidelity, domestic violence, sexual harassment etc.) disparages men and teach women NOT to trust them. Women are taught to be self-seeking, and promiscuous. By killing trust, they have killed love. This is the feminist formula for purging the world of love.
Communism is Satanism, and until we realize we are under daily occult attack, we will be helpless to defend ourselves.
The difference between an alpha and beta man is that an Alpha Male convinces a woman to do what he wants. He makes her want to be his. A Beta Male hopes she'll love him if he does what she wants. A Beta Male can never satisfy a woman.
But a woman must choose to belong (surrender) to her husband. And, of course, a husband must first earn her trust (through courtship) and keep it.
Feminism cries out for "equality." Equality does not mean the same. Men and woman have different needs. Men need power; women need love. Heterosexual love is the exchange of the two.
Below are excerpts from a 2013 essay by a man who accurately describes the damage done in the real world by feminism.
"Woman is a violent and uncontrolled animal... If you allow them to achieve complete equality with men, do you think they will be easier to live with? Not at all. Once they have achieved equality, they will be your masters."
- Cato the Elder
The New Age and Spiritual movements are fond of saying that history has been controlled by patriarchal societies which have suppressed the "feminine energy", hence causing imbalance and destruction. For example, the popular Internet films "Esoteric Agenda" and "Kymatica" make this point.
However, what these movements are afraid to admit, is that modern day feminism totally suppresses and destroys this "feminine energy" more than any patriarchal society ever did. And that's the irony, that feminism destroys femininity. So then, why use such a term when its effects are the exact opposite? Why isn't this movement called "masculinity for women"?
Obviously, whoever was behind this movement knew something about neurolinguistic programming - that by pretending to be the opposite of what you are, you trick and lure people by using deception. In this case, women who consider themselves "feminine" will uncritically assume that a movement called "feminism" must be on their side in helping with their womanhood and femininity, when nothing could be further from the truth.
The sad thing is that many women are tricked into thinking that this "new feminism" is somehow liberating them and allowing them to reach their full potential. Yet how can they become self-actualized by suppressing their own natural life force or feminine energy?
How is that wholesome or harmonious, when it's destructive to relationships and forces men to emasculate themselves and deny their own masculinity?
Any time you try to bring up something by oppressing others, it will be a formula for destruction. These women are tricked and lured in by the promise of "equality", which eventually turns them asexual, bestial and dominant before they know it. That's the "trap of feminism".
The natural female energy is loving, caring, nurturing, tender, and seeks a symbiotic relationship with the male energy. This results in the creation of life, the highest power. Whatever you want to call it - God, Mother Nature, the Universal Creative Force, etc. - that is how it was naturally meant to be. Male and female energy were meant to complement each other, not compete and tear each other down, or engage in any "battle of the sexes", which is what has happened (and may possibly be engineered by the global elite according to some sources, Google "Nick Rockefeller and feminism").
Yet the feminist movement and its values preach the complete opposite and antithesis. Not only do they incite male bashing and double standards against men in society but they indoctrinate women to look down on men, NOT NEED men, NOT WANT men, be independent, and view males as lower forms of life that are creeps and oppressors by nature. Men are not respected or admired, but seen as immature and dumb.
---------
Feminism ... makes dating a nightmare of epic proportions, and totally disrupts the natural harmony of men and women. It turns women hateful and apathetic toward men. In effect, it gives women an unaccountable status where they can get away with anything, and demonetize anyone who resists. As a result, they can abuse and mistreat men without judgment or consequences, for it is taboo to argue or stand up to them.
Females in America are given role models in the form of action stars, like Angelina Jolie, who in Tomb Raider as Lara Croft, is rough and tough, kicks ***, does not need men, does not act sweet, feminine or tender, does not giggle or blush, and all the while looking sexy at the same time.
Yet any honest natural man will tell you that such a woman with no feminine qualities is not attractive at all, and dealing with her is very awkward. How can you have a loving, intimate, fulfilling relationship with a woman who is rough and tough, doesn't need you and tries to act stronger than you? You can't flirt with her, court her, or charm her without feeling like you are violating her "independence from femininity". Yet you can't treat her like a male buddy either, because no matter how hard she tries to act like a man, she is not one, in ANY way. So what can you do with her?! You can't treat her like a man or a woman! It's the most awkward and unnatural thing.
Plus, a feminist can never become a man, because a normal man is not high strung or easily offended by little things the way a feminist or masculine woman is. Thus these feminists are more like bestial freaks of nature, rather than men, which is a horrible thing.
Furthermore, these feminists and independent women do not like to dress feminine. They hate wearing skits and high heels (which they view as oppressive) and like cutting their hair short to look like men. How can that be beautiful or feminine to men? How can that bring out the male attraction for the feminine? How can being strong, masculine and independent soothe a man's need for tenderness and fulfill his need for love and romance and his need to merge with the female energy?!
What strong independent American women don't understand, is that you can't make a man become more masculine by becoming masculine yourself. You bring out the masculinity in a man by becoming FEMININE! That's the key truth that feminism hides from you. Obviously feminism has F***ED up relationships in America, whether it was engineered or not. There's no way around it. And that's NOT a good thing.
---------------
It's a total scam against women. It masculines women and emasculates men, twisting the male/female dynamic out of whack, turning America into the most unnatural dating scene in the world. It is also tyranny in disguise, which seeks to placate and weaken males, while giving women unaccountable power, which corrupts and ruins relationships.
Feminists NEVER win on logic or reason, because their movement is not a rational one at all, but a hateful emotional one that uses shaming tactics rather than reason. Overall, it is destructive and deceptive to both men and women. Worst of all, it destroys and suppresses the most beautiful thing in the world - the feminine beauty and soul.
So if you are really pro-women and pro-female, you'd expose this scam and bring awareness of it, so people can see what it really is. You'd help women get back in touch with their true divine female energy inherent in them, and stop this scam which tries to get women to deny their own femininity.
--
You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2017/07/the-feminist-formula.html
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at
"The Focus was financed by a slush fund set up by some of London's wealthiest businessmen -- principally, businessmen organized by the Board of Jewish Deputies in England, whose Chairman was a man called Sir Bernard Waley Cohen, left. Sir Bernard Waley Cohen held a private dinner party at his apartment on July 29, 1936. This is in Waley Cohen's memoirs.
Irving then revealed further details of Churchill's financing by the Czechs, as well as the facts of Churchill's financial rescue by a wealthy banker of Austro-Jewish origins, Sir Henry Strakosch, left, who, in Irving's words, emerged "out of the woodwork of the City of London, that great pure international financial institution." When Churchill was bankrupted overnight in the American stock market crash of 1937-1938, it was Strakosch who was instrumental in setting up the central banks of South Africa and India, who bought up all Churchill's debts. When Strakosch died in 1943, the details of his will, published in the London Times, included a bequest of £20,000 to the then Prime Minister, eliminating the entire debt.
"In May 1940, Dunkirk, the biggest Churchill defeat of the lot....Letters between Churchill and the French Prime Minister, Paul Reynaud, revealed the ugly truth that Churchill, himself, gave the secret order to Lord Gort, the British General in command of the British expeditionary force at Dunkirk, "Withdraw, fall back," or as Churchill put it, "Advance to the coast." That was Churchill's wording. "And you are forbidden to tell any of your neighboring allies that you are pulling out. The French and the Belgians were left in the dark that we were pulling out."
Trump in Poland--Observations from a Polish Canadian
Santiago said (July 27, 2017):
You say, communist bankers use feminism to destroy love, marriage and family.
There are two reasons more!
To tax the other half of population,
And to get the children into they educational system of mental control
sorry my English
keep the good work, is admirable