Direct Link to Latest News

Below- Deuteronomy - Blueprint of the NWO? (scroll down)

Goebbels Diary Contradicts Holocaust Narrative

September 17, 2019


diary.jpg
"In May 1944 the deportation of Hungary's Jews to Auschwitz began. In just eight weeks, some 424,000 Jews were deported. By the end of the Holocaust, some 565,000 Hungarian Jews had been murdered." 

This is the official history but Goebbel's diary refers only to railcar shortages and using Hungarian Jews for labor.  

Even a "holocaust denier" like David Irving acknowledges that two million Jews were gassed.  It's a shame that other details cannot be scrutinized without fear of persecution. 


Trust Sabbatean Zionists to politically exploit a human tragedy that they were partly responsible for. 



By Thomas Muller 
(Excerpt by henrymakow.com) 

Apr 18, 1944 (II.12.44)

"The Führer then explained to the Gauleiters the background of his campaign in Hungary, and how it was designed. ...In particular, the Führer expected contributions from Hungary of food, oil, manganese, and people. In particular, he wants the 700,000 Jews in Hungary involved in beneficial activities for our war effort."

Apr 27, 1944 (II.12.199)

"300,000 Hungarian Jews have been detained and imprisoned in the concentration camps. They should come, in large part, to Germany as a workforce. Himmler will take care of this; above all, they are to be used for our difficult war production programs."

g-diary.jpg
May 4, 1944 (II.12.232)

"Our plenipotentiary in Hungary, Veesenmayer, gives an excellent speech on the decisive Hungarian factors. ...In particular, it's to his credit that the Hungarian potential is now in large part requisitioned for our war efforts. Also, the Jewish Question is now being handled more energetically. I insist that the measures taken against the Jews in Hungary have a factual basis. It's not enough that one only announces in the press what happens, but one must also explain it. In Budapest, the Jews are starting to be gathered into ghettos. The ghettos are built in the vicinity of the armament factories because air attacks are likely there. It is hoped thereby to avoid British-American attacks on Budapest, if at all possible."

By 1944, Germany's war production had relocated factories to bomb-proof underground locations, and small, satellite camps near factory locations. In Hungary, the Jewish labor force was already on or near location. But labor shortages were so dire that Nazi officials requested 700,000 Hungarian Jews be pulled from the satellite camps and brought to Germany for labor in armaments production. In 1944, any and all Europeans were conscripted into the labor force.

Many able-bodied Hungarian Jewish men were also up in the Carpathian mountains building massive in-depth defensive fortifications in summer 1944. They usually were labor battalions under Hungarian command.

A letter from Hitler to Horthy was uncovered. Hitler says Hungarian Jews will not sit out the war. A week later, on April 9, 1944, Prime Minister Sztójay places 300,000 Jewish laborers at the disposal of the Reich. Winter Watch note: There were 800,000 Jews in Hungary at this time.

Even so in this Times of Israel article from 2016 we see a fessing up, describing the "Glass House" operation whereby 50,000 to 80,000 Hungarian Jews were given passes to leave the country to Palestine.

In 1944, the Jews were still a strongly entwined group, especially in the economy. The expulsion of all Hungarian Jews, or those in the provinces outside Budapest, in an interval of two months, would have been like a virtual atom bomb dropped on the Hungarian economy.

As of April 19, 1944, the German authorities in Hungary were "encountering greatest difficulties" procuring rail transport even for 10,000 employable Jews on their hands. On April 27, they reported that, while transport had finally been arranged for 4,000 of them, rail shortages were still delaying the deportations for labor, which at that point contemplated 50,000 employable Jews.

Auschwitz was a large industrial complex. Much smaller contingents of Hungarian Jews would have been sent there as labor. But to use scarce rail stock to ship the infirm, elderly and children off to Auschwitz?

Yet, a fictitious claim attributed to the Auschwitz "camp resistance movement" states that from May 15 to May 25, 1944, each day saw 13 trains arrive, each train consisting of 48 to 50 cars, 100 Hungarian Jews to a car. That's 62,400 to 65,000 per day. There are no records of protests from German officials about having these valuable rail assets commandeered.

Other claims place 147 separate trains with box-car transports that were used. From Aug. 7-30, 1944, some 74,000 more Polish Jews were railed in from Lodz. In the midst of it, 7,503 ghetto inhabitants from Terezin (Theresienstadt), in western Bohemia, were sent 400 miles east to Auschwitz on three transports (May 15, May 16 and May 18, 1944).

Between Sept. 28 and Oct. 28, 1944, with the war lost and German columns pinned down all over Europe, the SS allegedly transported 18,402 Jews from Theresienstadt, Bohemia (today's Czech Republic) to Auschwitz, Poland, in 11 transports (over 180 box cars). The gassings allegedly continued until late October 1944.

These multiple mass movement of people operations would have to occur throughout the summer and fall of 1944 as German lines crumbled before Allied and Soviet offensives. Axis forces faced severe manpower and supply shortages largely impacted by transport and deployment. 

D-Day was in June 1944. At about the time of the Normandy breakout at St. Lo, a massive Soviet offensive called Operation Bagration started on June 22, 1944, that caught the Axis poorly deployed.

The Soviets focused their massive attacks on Army Group Centre -- not Army Group North Ukraine, as the Germans had originally expected. More than 2.3 million Soviet troops went into action against German Army Group Centre, which had a strength of fewer than 800,000 men. At the points of attack, the numerical and quality advantages of the Soviet forces were overwhelming.

By early August 1944, the Soviets were just east of Auschwitz, approaching Krakow, Poland, and were in eastern Slovakia. The German Luftwaffe was effectively neutered in these offensives and making desperate attempts to interdict Allied air raids. At this point, Germany was facing a refugee onslaught in the evacuation of its own nationals.

Furthermore, if extermination was the objective, why not improvise means to kill them in Hungary, and perhaps even blame it on the Hungarians? In fact, there are sites in Hungary that need to be disinterred. Although sites like Cservenka and Kerecsend have turned up smaller numbers of bodies, historians wedded to the Auschwitz story keep the forensics proceeding slowly, if at all. In actuality, most of the mass graves unearthed in Hungary contained the bodies of Hungarians who support the Axis war effort.




Scruples - the game of moral dillemas



You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/09/Goebbels-Diary-Contradicts-Holocaust-Narrative.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Goebbels Diary Contradicts Holocaust Narrative"

M said (September 18, 2019):

Marcos covered it pretty well in his response. Modern Judaism's world conquest goals are a distortion. There are different dispensations, ages in the history
covered by the Bible. We are in the age of grace. God did something new through concluding all are under sin, Jew and Gentile alike. There is a coming day of judgment for the world that doesn't accept God's gift of eternal life
but applying OT tactics of driving out current inhabitants of Palestine is a complete deception. The message for all Jew and Gentile is to simply repent and believe the Gospel as Jesus presented and explained in the New Testament.


Below- A Different View of JFK (scroll down)

Deuteronomy - Blueprint for NWO?

September 16, 2019

jozua_amorieten.jpg
Based on his reading of Deuteronomy, Douglas Reed (1895-1976) made these disturbing observations that, while not entirely new, still provide an epiphany:

1. The goal of Judaism is to destroy, dispossess and enslave non-Jews.

2.  There is nothing religious, moral or spiritual about Judaism. The Jewish 'Covenant with God' consists of an exchange of MATERIAL POWER for meaningless observance

3.  Judaism is typical of a satanic cult in that it coerces observance and murders genuine men of God (apostates.) Communism, a proxy for the political goals of Judaism, OPERATES THE SAME WAY. The US and Europe are now the major vehicles of this agenda. (See Note below article)

4. Most Jews are ignorant or in denial about the true nature of Judaism and the jeopardy in which it places them. 

The response (see Comments) from Christians refute this interpretation. To do this, they must ignore the fact that this interpretation corresponds to what is happening in the world. 

"By the time the end of Deuteronomy is reached, the moral commandments have been nullified... for the purpose of setting up, in the guise of a religion, the grandiose political idea of a people especially sent into the world to destroy and "possess" other peoples and to rule the earth. "

from June 11, 2017 
Chapter 3 THE LEVITES AND THE LAW
by Douglas Reed
(Excerpts by henrymakow.com)  

[After] the Assyrian conquest of Israel, the Levites in Judah began to compile the written Law. In 621 BC, they produced Deuteronomy and read it in the temple at Jerusalem. 

Deuteronomy is to formal Judaism and Zionism, what the Communist Manifesto was to the [Russian Revolution.] It is the basis of the Torah ("the Law") ... which forms the raw material of the Talmud...

Therefore Deuteronomy is also the basis of the political program, of worldly dominion over nations despoiled and enslaved, which largely has been realized in the West during this Twentieth Century.

god.jpg
...Religious intolerance is the basis of this "Second Law" ... and murder in the name of religion is its distinctive tenet. This necessitates the destruction of the moral Commandments, which ...are set up to be knocked down. Only those which relate to the exclusive worship of the "jealous" Jehovah are left intact. The others are buried beneath a great mound of "statutes and judgments" [i.e. the Talmud]...which in effect cancel them. 

Thus the moral commandments against murder, stealing, adultery, coveting, bad neighbourliness, and the like are vitiated by a mass of "statutes" expressly enjoining the massacre of other peoples, the murder of apostates individually or in communities, the taking of concubines from among women captives, "utter destruction" that leaves "nothing alive", the exclusion of "the stranger" from debt-remission and the like. 

By ...the end of Deuteronomy ... the moral commandments have been nullified in this way, for the purpose of setting up, in the guise of a religion, the grandiose political idea of a people especially sent into the world to destroy and "possess" other peoples and to rule the earth. 

horkheimer.jpg
(left, "egalitarianism" is the pretext they use to dispossess the goyim)

The idea of destruction is essential to Deuteronomy. If it is taken away no Deuteronomy, or Mosaic Law, remains. This concept of [creative] destruction as an article of faith is unique, and where it occurs in political thought (for instance, in the Communist philosophy) may also derive originally from the teaching of Deuteronomy, for there is no other discoverable source. 

Deuteronomy is above all a complete political program: the story of the planet, created by Jehovah for this "special people", is to be completed by their triumph and the ruination of all others. The rewards offered to the faithful are exclusively material: slaughter, slaves, women, booty, territory, empire. The only condition laid down for these rewards is the observance of "the statutes and judgments", which primarily command the destruction of others. 

The only guilt lies is non-observance of these laws. Intolerance is specified as observance; tolerance as non-observance, and therefore as guilt. The punishments prescribed are of this world and of the flesh, not of the spirit. Moral behavior, if ever demanded, is required only towards co-religionists and "strangers" are excluded from it. This unique form of nationalism was first presented to the Judahites in Deuteronomy as "the Law" of Jehovah and as his literal word, spoken to Moses. 

Deut.png
The notion of world domination through destruction is introduced at the start (chapter 2) of these "speeches supposed to have been delivered" by the dying Moses: "The Lord spake unto me, saying. . . This day will I begin to put the dread of thee and the fear of thee upon the nations that are under the whole heaven, who shall hear the report of thee, and shall tremble, and be in anguish because of thee".

 In token of this, the fate of two nations is at once shown. The King of Sihon and the King of Bashan "came out against us, he and all his people", whereon they were "utterly destroyed, the men, and the women, and the little ones", only the cattle being spared and "the spoil" being taken "for a prey unto ourselves". (The insistence on utter destruction is a recurrent and significant feature of these illustrative anecdotes). ...

FAST FORWARD TO 20TH CENTURY 

Deir-Yassin-massacre.jpg
By the Twentieth Century, the peoples of the West ...had ceased to attach any present meaning to these incitements, but the peoples directly concerned thought differently. 

For instance, the Arab population of Palestine fled en masse from its native land after the massacre at Deir Yasin in 1948, left, because this event meant for them (as its perpetrators intended it to mean) that if they stayed they would be "utterly destroyed". They knew that the Zionist leaders, [had] repeatedly had stated that "the Bible is our Mandate" (Dr. Chaim Weizmann), and they knew... that the allusion was to such passages commanding the "utter destruction" of the Arab peoples. They knew that the leaders of the West had supported and would continue to support the invaders and thus they had no hope of even bare survival, save by flight...


APOSTATES

32495_all_001_10-christ.jpg
Lest any such heretic should call in question the Law of destruction, Deuteronomy next provides that "if there arise among you a prophet or a dreamer of dreams . . . (he) shall be put to death"; the crucifixion of Jesus (and the deaths of numerous expostulants against literal Judaism) fall under this "statute". The denunciation of kinsfolk who incur suspicion of heresy is required. This is the terrorist device introduced in Russia by the Bolshevists in 1917 and copied in Germany by the National Socialists in 1933. 


CHOSEN PEOPLE, REWARDS AND PUNISHMENTS

Deuteronomy ends with the long-drawn-out, rolling, thunderous curse-or-blessing theme. Moses, about to die, once more exhorts "the people" to choose between blessings and cursings, and these are enumerated. The blessings are exclusively material: prosperity through the increase of kith, -- crop and kine; the defeat of enemies; and world dominion. 

jacr8.jpg
(left, World's most effective mind control)

"The Lord thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth . . . The Lord shall establish thee a holy people unto himself . . . And all people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the Lord, and they shall be afraid of thee. . . thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow. And the Lord shall make thee the head, and not the tail, and thou shalt be above only, and thou shalt not be beneath . . ." These blessings occupy thirteen verses; the cursings some fifty or sixty. 

The deity in whose name the curses are uttered clearly was held capable of doing evil (indeed, this is explicitly stated in a later book, Ezekiel, as will be shown). Literal Judaism is ultimately based on terror and fear and the list of curses set out in chapter 28 of The Second Law shows the importance which the priesthood attached to this practice of cursing (which literal Judaists to this day hold to be effective in use). 

These curses, be it remembered, are the penalties for nonobservance, not for moral transgressions! 

"If thou will not hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to observe to do all his commandments and statutes. . . all these curses shall come upon thee . . ." 

The city and the dwelling, the children, crops, and cattle, are to be cursed "until thou be destroyed and until thou perish utterly". Plague, wasting, inflammation, mildew, botch, emerods, scab, itch, madness, blindness, famine, cannibalism and drought are specified. 

Men's wives are to lie with other men; their children are to be lost into slavery; any that remain at home are to be eaten by their parents, the father, and mother contesting for the flesh and denying any to the children still alive. (These curses were included in the Great Ban when it was pronounced on apostates down to relatively recent times, and in the fastnesses of Talmudic Jewry are probably in use today).
---
fedds_dees.jpg
Related- Caryl Johnston- Remembering Douglas Reed


Note-  The promotion of homosexuality and transgenderism by private corporations indicates that they are controlled by the Masonic Jewish central bankers. Add to this, unrestrained media bias, free speech restrictions at universities/the Internet and it appears that we live in a de facto Communist society. The West today has been subverted and occupied by shills (i.e. Freemasons, Christian Zionists) for the above political agenda. In this perspective, the frenzied fight between liberals and conservatives is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic...especially if the stage is being set for another world war. IT IS ALSO CLEAR WHY JESUS HAD TO DIE. HIS GOD WAS UNIVERSAL, NOT A WARLORD DEDICATED TO ACHIEVING WORLD TYRANNY. 

First Comment from Marcos

The article is so misguided about theology, so full of syllogisms,  so lacking of real research that it's hard to know where to start any comment. It's an emotional attack on God and the Bible, disguised as an attack on Judaism, and the Illuminati must be enjoying it. Deuteronomy must be understood in context. Humankind was totally depraved, with the knowledge of God forgotten, violent and cruel. It was God's plan to bring a Redeemer, but He wanted to prepare the ground first, by establishing a people through which His name and character would be manifested and the lesson taught. But remember, this was done in a crude and violent world, not the world of flamboyant British intellectuals of the XX century. 

Canaanites worshipped Satan and burned babies to Moloch. Jesus never ever denied the Old Testament. God is powerful enough to keep the Bible exactly the way He wants. Jesus said that. Deuteronomy never said that the world was created for the Jews. This is a lie from the author. Modern-day Zionists distort and manipulate the Torah for evil gain. They don't follow it. If they did, they would "love the foreigners as themselves". 

Yes, it's there (Deut 10:19), and it reads just like Jesus' words. Even a casual reading of the Torah shows that the burdens and obligations of Israel were immense, and not a bed of roses. God taught what had to be taught through the Israelites of that time, made it evident that men could not save themselves by obeying the law by their own efforts, and moved ahead with the solution, the birth of the Savior. That's why we had the Jews, to learn we need a savior. I wonder why the Illuminati and the Luciferians hate so much the Old Testament? Maybe because the same judgment that fell on the Canaanites and Sodom will fall upon them? 

In the end, what the article does is to sell an image of a weak God who can't protect His Word, and of a confused Jesus who contradicts Himself. It hides from people the magnificence of the Bible, it's uniformity and coherence through the millennia, something that only God could have accomplished. Because almost nobody diligently read the Bible, this kind of hit piece works. The Zionists of today don't follow Moses (Jesus said the same about the Jews of His time). I encourage your readers to pray for God for understanding and read the Bible with a sincere heart. For technical and historical details, get a book from John MacArthur (Why Believe the Bible?) or from R C Sproul later. You will be blessed.





Scruples - the game of moral dillemas



You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/09/deuteron-Blueprint-of-the-New-World-Order.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for " Deuteronomy - Blueprint for NWO?"

Peter W said (September 17, 2019):

This article is probably the worst one you have had published. I am a Reformed Protestant and therefore believe the Jew as the Hindu or the Moslem must come to Christ to be saved. I also believe the New
Testament and especially the Epistle to the Hebrews, whose Author remains unknown, and will not write off the Jews.

To conflate Deuteronomy with the Talmud is the most appalling scholarship and the author, knowingly or not, by writing off the Pentateuch (the first five Books of the Bible) which was written by Moses, has denied the Gospel. I do not believe the Author, Douglas
Reed, was a Christian, and I think you, Henry, should have known better than to have published it.

You and Reed appear to have completely forgotten the references in the
New Testament to Jesus castigating the Pharisees and the warning in Revelation regarding the Synagogue of Satan. For some reason, which I suspect is an appalling lack of the basic understanding of Scripture, those who recognize the existence of such a Synagogue, always try and drag in all of Jewry. The New testament cannot stand without the Old and Jesus came to fulfill the Law (Deuteronomy) not to do away with it. He said this, not me.


Mario C said (September 17, 2019):

The problem with Deuteronomy is not in himself but the interpretation. The core problem between Talmudic Jews and Christian is the interpretation of Deuteronomy and the Promise that give God to Abraham. The modern Jews interpret the Deuteronomy as historical book , the promise give to Abraham of the seeds ( plural) ,a big offspring and dominium over a promised land. In Christian interpretation the Deuteronomy is a religious book and metaphorical meaning not a historic one. The seed, ( in singular)of Abraham is the Christ in us, God in us, that free us of the ego and carnality. The first son of Abraham is Ismael the son of the slave Agar and is representation of the carnal ego. The second one is Isaac ( that means he smile or he laugh) that is son of Sara ( that means Princess) the spouse of Abraham and a free woman. Isaac so is representation of our spiritual being and our carnal ego is represented by Ismael). For that reason Ismael when Isaac is born is released ( expulsed) and only remain Isaac. So the promised land is our true self , our spirit and not an earthy land in Middle East as Talmudic jews believe. Talmudic Jews think that the Bible is a historical book and take it literally. But Abraham Isaac Sara are imaginal personalities to explain a spiritual reality, not real historical people. All these explanations are in the Paul letters the founder of Christianity. Real mosaic jews follow this idea the same as Christians. For that reason, Nicodemus and others members of the Sanhedrin understand the truth in Jesus spiritual doctrine because Jesus follows the real meaning of scripture( old testament). To be an Israelite is a spiritual concept. Are the people that follow the will of God. The people that have faith in God and follow the way of the Christ in us. ( Not ethnical or ancestry matter.) Because Abraham has faith in God he reaches the Promise.

The other point is the Law. Is the law of creation. Is that God and man create by conscience, feeling, and imagination. This law is neutral, can be for good if you imagine good things or bad or evil if you imagine bad or evil things. Is as you say in mindfulness explanation: you can see on the screen the film that you want to see good or bad. Your imagination creates your reality. The Law is the same idea that Jon Rappaport explains.


Kevin Boyle re. Marcos said (September 17, 2019):

Jesus condemned the scribes and Pharisees. Is it explained in the New Testament why the scribes were to be condemned? Was it not for rewriting the Law? For lying about the original teachings that constituted "The Law"?

Christian churches (that came to work in partnership with the establishments of their day) always taught that the Gods of the Old and New Testament were the same God. They therefore taught us to believe in a God that contradicts Himself ... surely an obvious and impossible nonsense.

The Marcionites taught that the God of the Old Testament was a Satanic demiurge, using the very evidence forwarded by Reid in 'The Controversy of Zion'. Establishments refused to embrace Marcionite Christianity and it died out as a Church. Whether violence was involved in its demise I know not.

What IS clear is that establishment rule has always tended to proceed from Old Testament self-serving Jehovian principles rather than genuine Christian teachings. Was the preservation of Yahweh/Jehovah under the cover of Christianity a limited hangout operation much like the way that Marx's materialist equalitarian idealism was a cover for the imposition of another particular kind of central banking tyranny?

Reid's analysis is surely correct for one simple reason. God, the creator CANNOT HAVE TWO FACES, one evil and one good. God affirms all, including the soul foolish enough to serve evil (knowing that its correction rests ultimately in the results of its own actions FOR ITSELF). No true GOD can demand evil. It is self-evident that GOD cannot contradict HIM/HER/ITSELF.

Whatever theologians or apologists for the OT aspect of traditional Catholic/Christian theology might say.


Essel said (September 17, 2019):

Among the cognitive biases, one of the most widespread and ignored is probably the "hypothesis confirmation bias". It consists in taking into account only what suits you. D. Reed commits it widely, as does the "illusion of knowledge bias", his Siamese brother. Let's show it briefly.

1°/ Probably because of its native Anglo-Saxon culture, basically Protestant in essence, D. R. interprets Sacred Scripture himself, of course, as it suits him. In this respect, it is no different from the Germanic princes of the Reformation, who joined Protestantism especially for reasons related to divorce and remarriage, with significant economic consequences. Nevertheless, they claimed to self-qualify themselves as "Christians", a word which, from a strict synonym of "Catholic", began - classical revolutionary syndrome - polysemic, to designate very different and mutually incompatible realities, and which, in the end, DOES NOT DESIGN ANY DOCUMENTED DOCTRINE.

2°/ Moreover, he totally ignores the first rudiments of Catholic doctrine and its rigorous and logical articulation with the history of the Church, as Marcos and JG pointed out. And especially this, which can never be repeated enough: the next source (for the faithful) of the Faith is NOT THE BIBLE but the Catholic Doctrine taught by the Church and the (true!) Popes under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The Bible AND the oral TRADITION transmitted by the Apostles are only the so-called distant source of the Faith, for theologians.
Everything that appears in the Bible, and especially in the Old Testament, is only a description, a raw material, a relationship of what some protagonists have done, of good AND evil. As such, the Bible read and interpreted ad libitum cannot be an example to follow!

This is a typical example used by smart people who reject the Old Testament by anti-Semitism in the wrong (racist) sense of the term. They invoke Numbers XXXI 17-18 to say that the Law admitted paedophilia with Goyim's daughters. But this is not the Church's interpretation, which only affirms only the possibility of marrying them, as evidenced in Deuteronomy XXI 11-13.

Likewise David's name is honored by Catholics not for the abominable crimes he committed (adultery, murder, etc.) BUT quite the contrary for his bitter repentance towards these crimes. This sets an example - alas rarely followed - and also teaches that our God can forgive the worst sins IF THEY ARE REGRETED and if THEY ARE ASKED.
And so on.


JG said (September 17, 2019):

The problem with a lot of people who reject the Old Testament is they can't accept God as a vengeful God.
Did Jesus Christ reject the God of the Old Testament? Did he not repeatedly quote the Old Testament?
With all this "New Age" stuff going around we have lost our compass here.

The Jesus that a lot of people today claim they worship is a Jesus that is separated from the Old Testament. Was Jesus not in the Old Testament himself?

The Law of the Old Testament was fulfilled with the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
We're living on the other side of the Cross now and with a New Covenant. It is fuedal to continue to question the Old Testament because if we do than what will stop us from rejecting the New Testament also.

Salvation is all about obedience and not about putting the Holy Bible on trial.

We're not required to be scholars of the Word to have an inheritance in the Kingdom of Heaven.

If you obey the Ten Commandments and love the Lord your God (Deuteronomy 6:5) first and then your neighbor as yourself (Mark 12:31) you are well on your way to salvation.


Art said (September 17, 2019):

Thanks for explaining this evil bloody scripture to us.

From the Greek, "deuter-second onomy-naming".


James C said (September 17, 2019):


IMO, Douglas Reed interpreted Deuteronomy from a perspective of fallacious reasoning and historical ignorance. Like so many other critics of the Bible, he carefully picked and choose only those parts of the text that would support his central thesis: that the Old Testament is entirely the work of an ecclesiastical elite, written with the express purposes of self glorification and as a divine license to commit unspeakable atrocities on entirely innocent peoples.

First of all, the idea that the Old Testament was written to somehow glorify the Jews is probably one of the most profoundly ignorant ideas biblical critics have ever come up with. One of the factors lending credence to the biblical record is the fact that it exposes the faults of its leading characters, in this case the Jews. Beginning with their apostasy at Mount Sinai, through the wilderness wanderings, and their monarchial periods their biblical record is absolutely abysmal. Therefore, if the purpose of the Old Testament was glorification of the Jews, then it certainly failed.

Second, the idea that the Old Testament is somehow a divine license to commit unspeakable atrocities on entirely innocent peoples is another fallacious and profoundly ignorant idea, which entirely ignores the biblical context, history, and the findings of archaeology. Biblical critics would have us believe that the Canaanites were innocent victims of a wrathful and unjust God. Far from it. The Canaanites were probably some of the most depraved, diseased, and immoral people who ever existed. As such their destruction was more like an act of mercy than that of a merciless and vindictive God. The Canaanites were the moral equivalent of Ted Bundy, Wayne Gacy, and Jeffrey Dahmer. By their own deeds, they had become worthy of death.

In conclusion, Douglas Reed was anything but a true biblical scholar. His book has very little, if any, credibility.


Rudy said (September 17, 2019):

Regarding Deuteronomy, I disagree with the entire premise of the writer. The I AM of the Old Testament made a covenant with Abraham that he would be the father of many nations, as many as the stars, Genesis 15. He passed the promise to Isaac who passed it to Jacob. Jacob who's name was changed to Israel fractured the promise amongst his sons and 2 grandsons. After 400+ years God contracted Moses to bring his first born son out of Egypt. He made a covenant with corporate Israel since they collectively held the promise. They continually blew it. In Hosea 1 God abandoned the Northern 10 tribes by "cutting them off". They went on to become the Samaritans. Please consider that premise and read Christ's encounter with the woman at the well John 4.

The 70 weeks prophecy of Daniel 9: 24-27 was fulfilled after Jesus was baptized in the Jordan. Jesus confirmed it Mark 1:15. When the Southern kingdom which included Judah, Benjamin, and Larry and the Levites rejected Jesus as Gods messiah and he was resurrected God "cut off" all that was left of the ancient Isrealites except 1... The remnant of Israel which is Jesus Christ. When you read Pauls letter to the Romans, especially Romans 11 he clarifies this sequence. When he says all Israel will be saved he means that all who attach themselves to Jesus by faith will be grafted in to Israel...the remnant...Jesus Christ.

In Jeremiah 31:31-34 God elucidated that he would make a new covenant with his people. These verses are directly quoted in Hebrews 8. In Galatians 3:16 Paul basically claims that Jesus is the fulfillment of the promises made to Abraham in Genesis 15.

So in closing, the ancient Hebrews were Gods chosen people because through these knuckleheads would come the Messiah. In Matthew 24 the Olivette discourse Jesus prophecies that the temple, Jerusalem, and the Jews would be destroyed, which is what the prince of Rome Titus did. Flavius Josephus documented this catastrophe which mirrored exactly what Moses said would happen to the children Israel if they disobeyed Deuteronomy 28:48 forward.

Modern Israel has nothing to do with the bible or the God of the Old Testament or Jesus Christ his messiah. The prophecies quoted by the Zionists today we're all fulfilled in the Old Testament. Like Henry displays regularly, Talmudist, Cabbalist, Zionist Jews worship something other than God.


Below- Cabalist Bankers Funded Hitler Via Wehrmacht (scroll down)

A Different View of JFK

masonic-jfk.jpg
Francis, the author, is a self-described "white voodoo" adept. 
I don't agree with this reappraisal of JFK but I post for purposes of
discussion. 

This picture of Kennedy in a Masonic handshake with
David O. McKay, President of the Mormon sect, lends some credence
to Francis' disparaging view of the late President.  

However, I reiterate that I don't agree with this assessment.
Despite his shortcomings, JFK was the last President to genuinely represent
the interests of the American people. That's why he was murdered. 





By Francis 
(henrymakow.com) 

One character that all dissidents sanctify as both a paragon of virtue and living proof of a conspiracy is JFK.  Be not mistaken: the US constitution, as a perfect masonic construction, never allowed any but practicing Satanists to attain high positions, the worst having been Benjamin Franklin.  

JFK had NO good intention whatsoever as regards the American people.  Had he developed the slightest one, or had he been unexpectedly horrified by the conspiracies he discovered as he got down into real political practice, he would have been first utterly demonized.

You can be sure that if JFK had committed the slightest act of real disobedience towards the elites he would have passed as an even far worse monster than Nixon.  JFK was granted a glorious death as a tragic hero because he obeyed all too well to his sponsors, a process Masons call apotheosis.  

Moreover, JFK had just commanded two just two big evil American operations.

The first mission was the perfect unfolding of the Vatican II Council as the B'nai B'rith wanted it to proceed, and the US then absolutely needed to be under the command of a nominal catholic (though a purely Mafia one) outside the purview of Masonry (though of Jesuits who can do the same magic).  

JFK made sure that the Vatican council would exonerate the Jews of all guilt regarding the murder of Christ (this even though most Jewish authorities had always claimed the murder of Christ as a glorious founding event of their religion) and make any form of antisemitism as a mortal sin...

The second task was the official setting up of the Apollo project: he as well as others in the know knew perfectly well it was infeasible even in theory, the cosmic radiation just doesn't allow any living being to survive beyond a certain low orbit.  JFK's ambition was not even to beat the Soviets on the propaganda turf.  JFK's idea was that if you made the people believe in the biggest lie ever by its magnitude it could be then after made to believe anything and lose all control over its own physical reality.

The only problem is that once you pull off such feats of absolute historical mendacity your sponsors just have no interest to let you survive many days, in case your own heart would betray you into disobedience or repent thereafter.

When JFK realized what he had done, it was too late for him: he had only God to pray and ask forgiveness from. Even that is not very certain, because JFK's sexual life remained a pure horror show to the last end.  Even though he was not a pedophile like many others were, his fantasy up to the fag end of his existence as a male was to dispose of women to have them killed after use by his secret services like in one thousand and one night's tales.  JFK was a kind of American Nero, not of an American hero like the Gracchi brothers.

JFK never endangered the FED's authority over money supply: that's an academic legend for dissidents.  The only thing he did was to let the state emit government bonds payable in physical silver, which is way different: bonds payable in supposedly physical metal have always proven to be scams and JFK's initiative rapidly turned out to be yet another one that died out for lack of suckers.  

JFK never endangered the Zionist project: the reason why the right to nuclear warheads was temporarily denied Israel by his signature was because then Israel was still considered an over-humanistic and utopian entity by most American Jewry. You don't entrust big weapons to hippies before they have turned into very good and proficient yuppies. Anyway, the whole American nuclear industry had then always been off-limits for all goys, you had to be Jewish to get even a diploma in that domain, therefore JFK's decision, which he never took without consulting higher Jewish authorities, amounts to practically nothing.  

When JFK said he would hire only the best and brightest, he really meant goys need not apply.  Actually he was the first American president to owe his existence as a politician to Mainstream TV alone, a most ominous event in the course of history.  

LBJ always intended to depose JFK,  become president himself and use JFK's perfect image as the impetus to pass his mass desegregation and immigration bills. 

 LBJ did not betray JFK though (like Stalin did not betray Lenin howsoever, as the latter had already installed the whole gulag system) : JFK often considered that a society ruled by mafias like India was the closest one to the laws of nature and that mass immigration from mafia countries such as Southern Italy or India was highly desirable for the advent of a more mature American society.
----
Related - Other articles by Francis on this site

Voodoo Adept Foresees Civil War - henrymakow.com

https://www.henrymakow.com › 2016/11 › war-for-americas-soul
Nov 19, 2016 - Francis, who is a Voodoo adept, says Hillary is a witch. ... Voodoo is there to be accused of ritual crimes it doesn't commit, exactly in the way ...
Voodoo Adept Sees Civil War - Henry Makow

https://www.henrymakow.com › 2016/11 › voodoo-adept-sees-civil-war-2
Nov 20, 2016 - Francis is a voodoo adept. While his specific scenario for civil war seems. outlandish, current events do reflect a feigned conflict between ...
Homosexuality: A White Voodoo View - henrymakow.com

https://www.henrymakow.com › 2014/06 › voodoo-view-of-homosexuality
Jun 28, 2014 - Our resident Voodoo adept provides insights into the ailment that our satanist (Judeo ... Also by Francis: Jews: The Voodoo View. ShareThis ...
Judaism is a School of Magic (Witchcraft) - henrymakow.com

https://www.henrymakow.com › 2017/03 › judaism-school-of-magic
Mar 23, 2017 - Francis is a Voodoo adept who describes the true esoteric character of Judaism. "Any ritual practice is considered as valuable [if] it is materially ...
Protocols of Zion Understates the Horrible Truth - henrymakow ...

https://www.henrymakow.com › 2017/07 › protocols-of-zion-understates-
Jul 15, 2017 - Francis, a white voodoo adept, has contributed many articles to this site. by Francis. (henrymakow.com). The reality about Jews and Zionists is ...

First Comment from David C

Hi Henry!  JFK was a Bilderberger, and elitist, until his mistress, Mary Meyer, dosed him with LSD.  I'm convinced of that because his speeches changed dramatically in the last few months of his life.  Mary Meyer joined a group of wives who had husbands in powerful positions and wanted to dose them with LSD to bring about world peace.  Ms. Meyer got some pure Sandoz LSD from Timothy Leary, and talked JFK into dosing with her - she had already gotten him smoking marijuana in the white house, during their clandestine sexual encounters there.  Supposedly JFK planned to divorce Jackie after his second term expired, and she learned about his plans, which may be why she was involved with his murder.  Remember how she had his brains splattered all over her dress, yet she kept her composure as LBJ was sworn-in...?  That may be why she wasn't visibly upset, as any loving wife would have been.  

Mary Meyer was married to Cord Meyer, a Marine WW-II veteran, and one of the highest-ranking members of the CIA, in charge of Operation Mockingbird, which was basically using mass media for mind-controlling the population.  After JFK was murdered, Mary Meyer was murdered while jogging along the Potomac to her art studio.  Cord Meyer on his death bed supposedly said: "the same sons of bitches who killed JFK killed my wife".  

Cord still called Mary his wife, even though they were separated at the time of her death.  I have to believe it was the LSD that changed JFK form an elitist, into the great man he became at the end of his life, which we can still feel when listening to the wonderful speeches he made.  Up until Mary Meyer changed him with the LSD doxing, JFK was an elitist - no friend of us "little people", and he was widely hated by many.  Look at it this way: if JFK hadn't done things the evil entity wanted to happen, he wouldn't be portrayed as a great man in modern history books.  After JFK was murdered, Mary Meyer said: "he changed too fast". 




Scruples - the game of moral dillemas



You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/09/a-different-view-of-jfk.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for " A Different View of JFK "

BB said (September 17, 2019):

JFK never represented American interests. He only represented Vatican interests.

Americans could not find Vietnam on a map, until we elected our first Roman Catholic president. Then, Vietnam became the most important place on earth. The Vatican refused to give up one of their last slave colonies,which mainly exported opium and rice whiskey. The Vatican operated Vietnam as a profitable slave colony from 1858 to 1948. The US and the UN wanted Vietnam to continue to operate as a Vatican slave colony forever, but Ho Chi Mihn had a different idea.

JFK authorized the Bay of Pigs invasion in Cuba, but then refused to authorize air support for the mission he authorized. Now Cuba is ruled by a genocidal communist regime friendly to the Vatican.

JFK concealed from the voting public the fact that he had Addison's Disease. During his summit meeting with the Soviets, the US president was stoned out of his mind on a drug mixture of pain relievers and uppers. He was stoned out of his mind during the entire short length of his term.

JFK publicly flaunted his serial infidelity.

I could go on and on about this liberal scumbag, but he is not worth my time


JG said (September 17, 2019):

JFK was an avid reader and a cerebral type of leader, something we haven't had since Richard Nixon.

Along with this irresponsible article, there is also an off the wall comment to go with it.

JFK was not a rock star and it wasn't a hit of LSD that made him a great President either.

To compare JFK with Nero tells you just how far gone this writer is.

JFK was not a NWO stooge. He was a nationalist and a patriot who was not controlled by foreign governments or foreign lobbies. This also included the CIA. He also was opposed to Communism and was a strong defender against it.

JFK had a long list of enemies that conspired together to assassinate him. And, Washington has never regained it's political sovereignty ever since.


Essel said (September 16, 2019):

I will give my point of view on the method followed with reference to Thomist noetics (theory of knowledge).

I would say that the principle of inductive analysis used by Francis is good because it is not based on technical and particular "details" on which the ordinary man will never have the means to investigate and which may be different from what he imagines. He tries to frame the character from great truths that flow from common sense.

Curiously enough, he derogates from this rule for the Apollo mission since he invokes the impassability of Van Hallen's belt on which he could probably be defeated by a true connoisseur. While a reasonable degree of certainty can be reached from the fact that it was a bluff by simply noticing that this "feat" has remained without future or renewal for 50 years, which is in strict contrast to the behaviour observed during real scientific or technological "breakthroughs".

Unfortunately, therefore, this analysis is not conducted with rigour and with the aim of avoiding the classic sophisticistic biases. Without sorting, which would be too tedious, we can say that there is probably some truth in what Francis says.

Although, even if the work were more rigorous, there would never be anything more than an analysis, which requires a synthesis (verification) before stating what an analysis, which is always imperfect, leads to. There is no shortage of "perfect culprits" in the judicial annals... who have proved to be innocent!

That said, without going so far as to be certain, we must, as far as possible, learn to determine what we must "hold true" to major events such as attacks, conflicts, etc. in order to practically determine our behaviour.

Otherwise, we are in great danger of being accused of complicity in the crime during the post-mortem trial: "You could have suspected it, I gave you the intellectual means to see clearly, and you did not do anything about it, so you are an accomplice!"


Tony B said (September 16, 2019):

Henry,

JFK did not live up to a true Catholic life, not too different from the average American Catholic of his time of infiltrated Freemasonic deliberate deterioration of the Church into Vatican II, etc.

However, even with his naturalized womanizing and other common American faults, he and his brother planned to destroy the CIA run "deep state," returning American government to at least a semblance of a democratic state wherein the wishes of the people would be somewhat considered, which was an obvious reason for that organization's cooperation with the Israeli State to "terminate" him, as Kennedy had bluntly told Menachim Begun that there would be no nuclear weapons allowed them from the U.S., which amounted to his real death warrant.

Some Catholic haters can get really ridiculous.


Bankers' Children's Climate Crusade (from Andrew)

September 9, 2019

protest7.jpg
This image from Friday protest, Sydney, Australia, November 2018


Bankers' Children's Climate Crusade  (from Andrew) 


THE INTERCEPT INVITES you to watch a special event 6:00pm in New York City this evening, hosted by Intercept senior correspondent Naomi Klein, author of the forthcoming book "On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal," and headlined by trailblazing climate activist Greta Thunberg, author of "No One Is Too Small to Make a Difference."

We're supposed to believe that an autistic 16-year-old, Greta Thunberg, single-handedly created The Global Climate Strike a year ago when she started skipping school on Fridays to protest Climate Change outside Sweden's parliament. Purportedly like magic and without any outside funding or organizational support, kids around the world began to follow her example skipping school on Fridays to demand action on climate change.

sorberg.jpg
Why would the Global Elite like Soros select an autistic, clinically depressed teenager with learning disabilities like Greta Thunberg? To begin with, it's harder to criticize a handicapped person. And of course a teenage alarmist must behave as simple-mindedly as her supporters so they can think they are as smart as her.  And children are traditionally gullible and easily misled, so Greta is perfect for this hoax...

I learned about The Global Climate Strike firsthand last May 10 (which was a Friday) in Rome when on tour with a private guide at Piazza del Popolo (People's Square). It began with 300 or 400 young girls (13-16 years of age) marching in with whistles blowing and began to chant in Italian. I couldn't hear my guide, so she suggested we take a cab to The Pantheon to escape the noise.

In the cab, my guide explained that these were children's climate protests and that they had been getting worse. The cab driver understood English and chimed in that there were several other children's climate protests in progress in Rome that afternoon. They weren't protesting at the Pantheon so there we continued my tour, but worldwide The Global Climate Strike is huge.


Feminism isn't New---Aristophanes - Assembly of Women

August 21, 2019

41yoIQNTEnL._SX315_BO1,204,203,200_.jpgFeminism isn't new
A specter is haunting Athens, the specter of communism. This premise animates the plot of Aristophanes' comedy "Ecclesiazusae" (or "Assembly of Women"), wherein the heroine Praxagora leads a conspiracy of hags dressed as men to vote themselves into power. Fresh from her victory, Praxagora unveils her plan for a brave, new world where all property, children, and sex are held in common. What follows is an uproariously funny, shockingly vulgar, tremendously insightful satire of communists and the logical consequences of their ideology. Mayhew's translation and introduction would make for a perfect adjunct to any discussion of Plato's *Republic*, especially in an introductory Greek Lit & Civ course. 

First, Aristophanes has arguably innovated aspects of communism that would later influence Plato. Second, the play contains so many allusions to contemporary events (helpfully explained by Mayhew), that it provides a useful introduction to ancient history, political philosophy, and dramatic literature. Last, the comedy is funny enough for anyone (particularly sophomores!) to enjoy, and if it's the only play they actually read, they'll know something important about ancient Athens, thanks to the guidance of Robert Mayhew. (Amazon Review)

A Few Random facts about the LGBTQ "Community"

July 19, 2019

bz-5cfc8f07d768d.jpeg