Direct Link to Latest News

Below---Student Anti-Gun Protests Orchestrated by Soros Communists(scroll down)

Protocols of Zion are Genuine: Col. House Had a Personal Copy

March 17, 2018


(Ventriloquist Edward House, right, with his  Dummy President Woodrow Wilson, left)

Some time ago, Stan Monteith, (1929-2014) a pioneer NWO researcher, found a typewritten copy of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" in the papers of Col. E.M. House at Yale University. 

This seemed like confirmation of the widely held view that House (1858-1938) was a Rothschild agent. House was an "adviser" to Woodrow Wilson and FDR. It makes sense that he would have a copy of the Blueprint for the New World Order in his possession. He elaborated on this diabolical program in his political manifesto, "Philip Dru Administrator." (1912) I began a comparison of the two manuscripts here.

Spencer Percival continues this comparison below and makes the point, Why would

Rothschild's US consiglieri own a private typescript if The Protocols were a "forgery?"  

"This is massive, the Protocols now having a direct provenance to an unimpeachable source which effectively destroys all the so-called debunking; even the ADL will have a hard job to discredit House as an anti-Semite."

We are human collateral against the national "debt":  House on "Social Security" -" Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges."


by Spencer Percival


Colonel Edward Mandell House (July 26, 1858 - March 28, 1938) was an adviser or 'puppet master' of two US presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, overseeing passage of the Federal Reserve Act, the so called Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution to permit Congress to levy an Income Tax, America's entry into World War one, Versailles (where he also helped set up the Council on Foreign Relations, America's equivalence of the Royal Institute), recognition of the Soviet Union, gold confiscation bank holiday, and formed The New Deal. 

Considered by many to be a major Rothschild agent, he exposed his agenda for humanity in a meeting with Woodrow Wilson.

"[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property1 in a national system2 designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging.

By such methodology, we can compel people3 to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency4.

Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel5, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.

Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading6 to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.

They will be stripped of their rights7 and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund the government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges.

This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call 'Social Insurance.' Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office8 of our dummy corporation9 to foment this plot against America."


Notwithstanding all the furor that accompanied the Marsden publication from 1919 which continued throughout the twenties and thirties, House and his executors determined to leave to posterity this version of the Protocols.

On receipt of the copies I was most surprised at the tattered looking images of which were 99 manual typewritten pages replete with typo's and multiple corrections and other indications11 that this was being copied and that the typist wasn't a professional and therefore likely to be Edward House himself, which may suggest he didn't wish any other eyes to see the document, however without going to Yale University and comparing them to his other papers I cannot say conclusively it is equally possible that he received the MS 'as is' from another party.

My first action was to scan, ocr12 and proofread the manuscript and when done, one of the first things to stand out was missing protocols and duplicate ones. Whilst the missing protocol and one 'duplicate protocol' could be put down to a typo the same couldn't be said for Protocol XI. for which there are two distinct 'protocols', thus the House MS has in fact 25 protocols as against 24 protocols in the Marsden MS which may or may not have esoteric significance.

On closer examination what shows is a slightly different Protocol numbering and the splitting of a Marsden Protocol into two, thus Marsden Protocol 3 'Methods of Conquest' has moved to House Protocol 10 causing Marsden Protocols 4 and 5 to become House Protocols 3 and 4, as House Protocol 5 doesn't exist they realign at Protocol 6 and the second House Protocol 6 is, in fact, the first part of Marsden Protocol 7 and completed with House Protocol 7, the first of two Protocols' 11 in House relates to Marsden Protocol 10 and the second House Protocol 11 realigns with Marsden Protocol 11.

The first thing noticed is the economy of paragraphs in the House MS. But reading the two texts, although using alternate vocabularies, both still impart the same meaning or intent, which continues throughout the Protocols.

In Protocol 11 there is a Latin phrase, now Latin in French, English or Russian should be the same but here we have modus vivendi in the House MS and modus agendi in the Marsden MS, whilst it falls in with a consistent alternate vocabulary that imparts the same meaning or intent, for the reasons stated above you would expect it to be the same if it were a translation, additional a French term coups d'etat is used in House Protocol 11 but not in Marsden Protocol 11 but in Protocol 15 and not in House Protocol 15.

Henry Makow has compared the first eight pages of the House MS with the Marsden MS, and he concludes that the nuances of the different words are significant and whilst I do not disagree with that statement I consider the intent of the vocabulary of the text to be more significant.

Conclusion: Protocols were "Serving Notice" 

Anyone who makes a honest study of the complete MSS cannot help but come to the conclusion that the source for the both of them is the same, whether that be a meeting or a text, with the inconsistencies noted above it points more to a meeting(s) than text, yet this does not explain the different orders in parts of the MS. That being the case the existence of the House MS proves the authenticity of the Marsden MS which most non-coincident theorists would have known anyway.

This is massive, the Protocols now having a direct provenance to an unimpeachable source which effectively destroys all the so-called debunking, even the ADL will have a hard job to discredit House as an anti-Semite.

As to the writer, I do not think it was an opposition copy for the simple reason it stands unique and surely the purpose of an opposition copy would be to disseminate it as widely as possible so that by now, over 100 years on, there would be several copies coming to light, also with this being about 9 years before the Marsden book came to press, it would have been a 'hot book'.

I think that it is more likely the work of a group, possibly Chabad or given that most these people are Luciferians and Cabbalists it may have even been channeled, which brings to mind another Woodrow Wilson quote:

"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."

Currently, my time is very limited, my main region of research being Law13 and health, As such, I have learned that Notice (as mentioned at the start) is an integral part of law systems starting with the cosmic law and down to the common and municipal law. Cities used to post (Notice) their laws at the gate, I now believe that such 'leaks' are in some cases by design, the fact is mankind has been noticed and on the fulfillment of their plans they can legally say you were told, you did not resist, you consented. However, I shall in all probability use the comparisons above as a start to complete a comparison volume (unless you beat me to it), but for now, here is House's ms PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETING OF THE ZIONIST MEN v2 Final (3).pdf

1 Children

2 Although all states had birth records by 1919, the use of the standardized version was not uniformly adopted until the 1930's

3 Persons would be more correct, as these are attached to people.

4 Backed by the "full faith and credit" of the U.S. Government!

5 Property

6 Record of Live Birth - Birth Certificate

7 The Bill of Rights does not apply to 14th Amendment U.S. Citizens.

8 Presidency

9 The U.S.A. as opposed to the republic which is the united states of America.

10 Which may or may not be a translation.

11 Addition of footnotes and comments to MS.

12 Optical Character Reader.

13 There are many misconceptions about the law, part of the same consensus reality with assumptions and presumptions allowed to be inculcated into society if you wish a glimpse of what real law, as opposed to code, is, a reasonable site to visit is Private Person.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Protocols of Zion are Genuine: Col. House Had a Personal Copy "

Al Thompson said (March 17, 2018):

Manmade laws are complete bullshit unless they conform to the natural law and if they do they are redundant. Everyone has a latent knowledge of the creator's natural law. "Ownership derives from contract, When using these so-called laws, there is no such thing as a contract because there cannot be informed consent. The government uses force and intimidation to get its way with the people. The government operates on brute force; not any valid contract. You can call it a forced contract which is not a contract.

informed consent, This is impossible because no one really understands what all of the words and terms are in manmade laws. When you go to court the judge will say: "Do you understand?" And the best answer to give is this: "I don't have enough facts to give you a responsive answer." Or the easier way is to say "no." They are trying to deceive people into this stupid contract stuff by asking the question. The law is a big lie, so who can understand it? Who would want to read it?

agreement, You're not agreeing to anything; you are being forced. I have a driver's license because I don't want to get beat up by the cops if I get pulled over. That is not a contract.

and valuable consideration related to ANY property. A man, woman, or child is no one's property with the exception the creator.

At law, everything is property, even your rights!" The law is bullshit and the main reason for it is that other men have no authority to make laws over other free people. One's existence doesn't depend on the STATE, State, or state. The state is complete tyranny, chaos, and immorality.

The common law approach lacks enforcement power. The oath is the main flaw in the "law." Once an oath is taken it is said that one "binds his soul with a bond." It is better to never swear any oaths. Swearing an oath is a ticket to hell.

No one is under any valid contract with any government because the whole thing is based on a fraud. The Protocols of Zion seem to be the master plan and the contract nonsense is a way for them to suck people into their house of horrors.

Manmade laws, with few exceptions, are based on the principles of Lucifer, which in turn proceed through the other religions. The state is Lucifer's hell on earth. I think it would be better to replace the state with the natural law. The natural law is easier to use and it doesn't need to be written down. There's a quote in the Book of Enoch which goes something like this: "It was not God's intention for man to confirm his faith with paper and ink." This book was used in the early Christian church.

There is no such thing as "informed consent" when dealing with the government.

In order for it to be informed, the government would have to tell you that their doctrines and laws are of the Devil. Then they would have to ask permission to screw you. Then you would have to give them permission. It's all a bunch of nonsense.

I used to watch men in prison use this material and I remember two guys who got involved with the contract and UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) and they got over 20+ years in prison. I told them not to use any of it because I knew what was going to happen. The best thing to do is to use the natural law and to separate from all of the other nonsense which produce bad results. Common law and law merchant will guarantee bad results. When anyone goes into a courtroom, they are in the Devil's domain and the legal process is sorcery.

Here's the big question: "What facts does anyone have that the government's laws apply to them?"

JG said (March 17, 2018):

I don't know about all the technical or grammatical language of the 'protocols' if these are genuine or not. What's more important is that we ask ourselves if they have been a roadmap for the political tyranny that has existed and does exist in the world today.

A NWO government would eventually have to have a common world currency under a central bank to control the government, armies, and populations of the world. This would then result in the loss of political sovereignty for all the nation states.
What's very shocking today is the world's insensitivity and regard for humanity that has resulted from NWO tyranny. Are " crimes against humanity" no longer a crime at all? Where is the United Nations voice on all of this, can anybody hear It?

The NWO plan WILL FAIL because lies can't stand forever. The only nation's that will be left standing are the ones who remained loyal to God and not the nations who remained loyal to the NWO.

Below- Outlawed: Pursuing a Woman (scroll down)

Student Anti-Gun Protests Orchestrated by Soros Communists

March 15, 2018

In 2015,  David Hogg, the school mass shooting extraordinaire/teen propagandist/"Gun Control" proponent, tweeted his support for pedophile satanist John Podesta's Public "think tank," Center for American Progress.  He also has a relationship with CNN which is virtually a branch of the Democratic Party. 

Communists have always operated through "popular front" movements, which pretend to be grassroots movements but are actually organized and funded by the Masonic Jewish (Communist) central bankers. Having run through women and minorities, they have recently mobilized students render patriotic Americans helpless to resist their police state.  

If we understand that Communism is really a monopoly over everything (money, power, thought) by the Masonic Jewish (Satanist) central bankers who issue our currency, you will understand that Communism has arrived and must be fought. 

by Christina Marlowe

One of the largest of the highly organized groups responsible for the recent engineered student demonstrations is called EVERYTOWN for Gun Safety Support Fund, a SuperPAC 501 (c)(3) that purportedly "...seeks to improve our understanding of the causes of gun violence and the means to reduce it..." Warren Buffet and NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg are among those on the Advisory Board.

EVERYTOWN is directly linked to Every Voice dot org, a 501 (c)(4) "social welfare" organization that is funded by several prominent figures, most notable Jonathan Soros and also by George Soros himself through his Open Society organization.

The recent onslaught of younger and younger students demonstrating in highly orchestrated Walk-outs to protest "Anti-gun violence" is astonishing. And very alarming indeed. Let's draw some significant historic parallels:

Communist China's cataclysmic and HORRIFIC "Cultural Revolution" (1967-1977) that was engineered by the savage dictator Mao Zedong, along with his many utterly brutal counterparts within the Chinese COMMUNIST party was in great part carried out by its public schools' PRODUCTS, ie. the students themselves.

Through public schooling system, the hugely successful brainwashing and mind control programming propaganda campaigns did in fact and in deed produce the most deviously effective, the most useful and the most necessary of WEAPONS to achieve the Communist goal of total control by using the Chinese people themselves, particularly the YOUTH, as the ultimate WEAPON to carry out the totalitarian Communist agenda.

China's use of the many freshly indoctrinated and thoroughly programmed youth during this violent social engineering campaign was seen in China's "Red Guards" which were comprised of rabidly eager and totally mind-controlled (YES, brainwashed) TEENAGERS.

These youth were given virtually unlimited POWERS to carry out the COMMUNIST GOAL of outright TERROR on its population. The Red Guards were afforded any and all means necessary to carry out this vicious agenda against even the senior citizens, including arbitrary censorship, vicious bullying, unrelenting beatings, harassment and stalking, public humiliation, false accusations, harsh terms of exile and finally life imprisonment.

All other forms of physical and mental torture and frequent "suicides" and assassinations became the norm against all Chinese society and against China's entire population. And it worked like a charm.


commie-fist.jpg(American girl makes a Communist fist)

The YOUTH are NOT ADULTS and should NOT be "given" ANY AUTHORITY, as ANY "authority" or "power" handed over to children or teenagers is exactly like giving a two-year-old child a fully loaded shotgun!

By the way, I am certain that nearly all of the censorship going on is being carried out by young power-tripping thugs. In other words, THE AMERICAN YOUTH.

Owen Benjamin - Listen to the Children!

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Student Anti-Gun Protests Orchestrated by Soros Communists "

Glen said (March 16, 2018):

When I am accosted by these little bugger picker's I ask them to Google one word. That word would be "Democide". I tell them they can even use the standard bearer of truth now which is undoubtedly Wikipedia. I ask them to explain to me how an unarmed citizenry will be able to assure its survival against this greatest murder machine the world has ever known. I then sit back and laugh as their mind melts and they stomp of calling me an old a-hole.

Connie said (March 16, 2018):

You of all people must see the high school kids marching is not about gun control, right?

Laying the groundwork...

It is a LIE that the kids self-organized. These kids are popping pimples and eating Tide pods. No, this is about them to be USED by leftist adults in high schools who are setting political agendas, disregarding any parents. These are the Hitler youth.
The infamous David Hogg is no less than 21 years old.

Stick with me here ...

This is about these particular high schools empowering minors to leave campus as if they were adults! Do they have “permission slips?” Who is liable if someone disappears or if something happens at one of the marches? So there is a conflict here with “en loco parentis”

Of course, treating a teen like an adult is nothing new. In California, a high school teacher or counselor can arrange for an abortion and send a 15 year old child off-campus during the school day without so much as the parent’s knowledge, let alone consent.

So we know right off this is an attack on each individual family of each individual student marching. Surely many of the parents are pro 2nd amendment.

But THIS is what is happening BELOW THE SURFACE of it all.

1) It is both glamorizing and institutionalizing teenage rebellion, which will certainly backfire on schools, teachers and parents. All those curfews and chaperones and such will henceforth lose credibility and be tougher to enforce than they already are.

2) It is making so-called heroes out of mere children IN THEIR OWN MINDS. This is pandering to the adolescent delusion of invincibility, which is one of their worst traits. It is the adults letting something out when it is THEIR JOB to reign it in.

3) So now teens everywhere will buy into the VICTIM mentality, and demand more and more “rights.”

ADDING SATAN to the mix...

Following the march, our suggestible minors are now ready for the final objective of this gun control masquerade.
Once sufficiently indoctrinated, they can now be pressed for the ultimate heroic crusade!

They will be told they LACK self determination with regard to

1) gender reassignment,
2) consent for sex, particularly sex with an adult BECAUSE THAT IS THE NEXT TABOO that must fall!

Do you agree they are being groomed EN MASSE, where the end game is to lower the age of consent?
“Look, we marched in the streets just like adults!”
I guess you could call it a double whammy, but ultimately this is not really about gun control,

Marco A said (March 16, 2018):

When the NWO reaches the apex and the end game arrives, it sure will be difficult being persecuted by these little high school shits. Every age has its fanatical fools who will kill and torture for ideologies not even their own.

Below- Kevin Shipp: Clinton Foundation the "Nexus of Everything" (scroll down)

Outlawed: Pursuing a Woman

March 14, 2018

"What many women and men privately know, but are now too afraid to admit -- the same truth that the success of "Fifty Shades of Grey," tells: Many women like to be dominated in bed."  
The books, women's porn, sold 125 million copies; the movies grossed $1.3 billion.
In general, most women want to accept their husband's leadership. Heterosexuality involves pursuit: Overcoming a woman's resistance and winning her trust and acquiescence. As the article below suggests, the #MeToo psyop has given heterosexuality a case of arthritis.  


1. The Illuminati manipulate society by using the hysteria surrounding a staged event to produce the desired outcome. Thus the phony 9-11 attack led to endless Zionist wars and the staged school shootings led to the Jewish banker-led gun-ban outcry. In the case of sabotaging heterosexuality, they sacrificed Harvey Weinstein and launched a #MeToo movement that would make any man think twice before so much as complimenting a woman. 

2. The sex act is an act of female surrender and male possession and ownership. Thus promiscuity is psychological poison for both males and females. Sex must be exclusive because that is what it is meant to signify. Sex is ultimately about procreation. The man must be confident that children he raises are his.  The Illuminati push promiscuity because they want to destroy the family unit and ultimately conceive and raise children industrially. 

3.  The reason so many young people today are lost is due to the Illuminati's destruction of the family ethos. If a man and a woman make raising their children their main priority, everything else falls into place. I credit Owen Benjamin's video, What Women Actually Want in a Man by Owen Benjamin for reminding me of this.   

by Hayley Phalen 
(Excerpts by 

Like all of us in the throes of #MeToo, I have been taking rigorous inventory of my sexual history, rolling back the tape on past highs and lows: the disturbing teenage experiences no longer chalked up to miscommunication, those times I gave in because it was easier, some unwanted advance successfully fended off.

And then there are the memories of being brusquely, and without permission, pushed up against a wall -- and loving it. In fact, those were the steamiest moments I could recall. I wondered if I would ever experience such an unscripted embrace again -- and then immediately worried: Did my secret desires make me a traitor to #MeToo and what it stands for?

No, according to Michaela Boehm, a sex and intimacy therapist, and psychologist; they make me pretty normal.

Her 25 years as a counselor have taught her what many women and men privately know, but are now too afraid to admit -- the same truth that the success of "Fifty Shades of Grey" tells: Many women like to be dominated in bed. "Not in their lifestyle, not in their career, but in the bedroom, many women would like to surrender," Dr. Boehm said. This may explain why, on Amazon's list of best-selling erotica -- a medium that, unlike pornography, is mostly produced and enjoyed by women -- themes of male dominance tend to, well, dominate.

Theories differ on whether this preference is a result of societal norms or biology or both. But it's interesting to note that separate research conducted by the sexologists Meredith Chivers and Marta Meana supports the idea that biology plays a supporting role. Moreover, 2009 study by Patricia H. Hawley at the University of Kansas found that the more socially dominant a woman was, the more likely she was to enjoy fantasies of sexual submission.

The last thing a woman wants to be worrying about while in the heat of the moment is whether her arousal is an expression of her own distinct eroticism or a symptom of patriarchal oppression. Yet, in the #MeToo landscape, many 30-and-under women and men -- including me -- are finding it harder to untease the two as we navigate dating and fledgling relationships. In a surprising twist, what began as a very public airing of powerful men's sexual misconduct has come to cast a certain sinister pall over private intimacies that once seemed perfectly O.K. to enjoy....

A rape survivor, Ms. Rand is well versed in feminist theory; she understands just how important and vital a shift such behavior from a young man is when it comes to casual sex. Yet, in practice, she had mixed feelings. "It's difficult because on the one hand you're like, 'Dude, if I didn't want it, I would stop you,'" she said. "On the other hand, that can be used against you if it was assault."

...The #MeToo movement has upended a number of old so-called rules that allowed powerful men to force their desire on women whose silence they could count on. Now we have new rules, and, when it comes to sexual harassment or workplace gender discrimination, this can only be a good thing.

However, the concept of prescriptive, universal guidelines is anathema to truly mind-bending sex. So is codifying it into a moral or political act. Doing so turns the bedroom into a court of public opinion -- one in which, as our inscrutable desires inevitably lure us into untested territory, both parties will leave feeling shamed. We don't need different rules; we need two empowered individuals liberated and secure enough to explore each other's impulses, to listen to each other, and ask for what they want -- even if that includes permission to not ask for what comes next.


First Comment from Nick:

This young woman's account neatly illustrates the way women nowadays have been conditioned to believe they can have the best of all worlds with none of the downside. Yet life is inevitably about tradeoffs and balancing advantages and disadvantages of different states of affairs. If women expect men to take the initiative and generally respond better to sexually aggressive men, this will tend to increase the number of situations where women are subject to unwanted sexual advances. On the other hand, if society heads in the current direction of demonizing male heterosexuality and adopting broad definitions of harassment or abuse, more men to avoid women and some women will be affected by a lack of male attention. There are tradeoffs, and you cannot always have the best of all worlds. 

"...The #MeToo movement has upended a number of old so-called rules that allowed powerful men to force their desire on women whose silence they could count on. Now we have new rules, and, when it comes to sexual harassment or workplace gender discrimination, this can only be a good thing."

By her own admission, women tend to respond well to sexually aggressive, entitled men. Yet how dare high status, successful men feel entitled to women! As with most feminism, this is about women being at war with innate female biology and psychology while pretending to be at war with inequitable societal structures. The truth is that evolution and natural selection has disposed women to respond well to certain aggressive or antisocial behavior in men. On some level, women are ambivalent about this. Yet it is easier to project these things onto society and men in general instead of accepting responsibility for their own role in this. 

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for " Outlawed: Pursuing a Woman "

KK said (March 16, 2018):

Henry, the fault is with women. They will sue. Few women can resist the temptation to have that kind of wonderful power over men where with just a few words, they have a man cowering in fear

Jude Duffy said (March 15, 2018):

The Australian World War II propagandist Sefton Delmer once wrote: "In real life women pursue the men; it's only in Somerset Maugham novels that the men pursue the women." That chimes with my own experience; men tend to be much more intimidated by women than women are by men, and in general, women tend to have more natural self-possession and suffer less from social awkwardness than men do. Also, I would argue that guys tend to feel they are playing for much higher stakes emotionally when it comes to wooing. Women will throw themselves at some chap - and if he rejects them they will laugh it off and go on to the next chap, whereas men often suffer from feelings of humiliation and rage when rejected; partly because they have bigger and more fragile egos than women do.

I'm not disagreeing with your general point; in fact, I think what I say supports it, since the new Orwellian Me Too atmosphere makes what men already found very difficult (making the first move) much more difficult again.

David said (March 15, 2018):

It is only a matter of time before more foreign dating services expand in Canada to cater to Canadian men
who are no longer legally allowed to have anything but business communication with Canadian women.

I am very thankful that my eldest daughter was able to find a good man to marry well before the changes
taking place the last two years in Canada.

Illuminati Tutor Youth in Treason by Ryan M

March 12, 2018



Illuminati Tutor Youth in Treason 

Communists exploit gender, race and class divisions.

Their latest suckers are youth who are being taught

to embrace the globalist agenda. 

by Ryan M 


As the New World Order captures the souls of the masses, its main target is youth. The youth of today will consummate this totalitarian globalist agenda. It seems they have been empowered, but in reality - it's all contrived via TV and social media. This is obvious from the pre-planned, gun control  onslaught by so-called students of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School after the "shooting event" on February 14th.

No sooner did the "shooting event" occur than we saw NWO agitator David Hogg push for gun control. He was rehearsing this message before the staged event occurred. He was given a platform on all TV networks while "real" students were shut down by CNN and told to read from a script. 

How does one teach youth to accept Marxist ideology? In his 1985 interview with G. Edward Griffin, former KGB whistleblower Yuri Bezmenov,   explains "It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages. The first one being "demoralization." 


It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of [their] enemy. In other words, Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generation of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism; American patriotism...."

Yuri was right. Society is being demoralized and has been for some time. Today's youth are part of a massive indoctrination agenda. The satanic inversion of everything good and wholesome is becoming the new normal.


The real brainwashing begins in elementary school where children are inundated with white guilt, gender fluidity, indigenous rights and the global warming hoax. The programming continues into middle school when older children are bused into large arenas to attend events like We Day. 


There they are told how important they are and how "they" have the power to change the world. The kids are encouraged to be good global citizens and hear from speakers such as Former President of the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev, outspoken socialist actor Danny Glover and global warming alarmist, Al Gore. They are encouraged to be outspoken on all types of social justice issues and mandated to go out and do good works. 

Pseudo-punk bands like Hedley play in between guest speakers as ads from financial intuitions and giant media corporations are prominently placed on big screens everywhere. It's a big, loud spectacle where over the top rock concert theatrics meets prosperity preacher tent crusade. The teens are completely caught up in the moment, feeling empowered and valued.

 Is there any hope for the youth of today? I believe there is. More and more young people are awake to what is happening around them. Comment boards are full of kids calling bullshit on the so-called official narrative of things. Thanks to people like Jordan Peterson, terms like Cultural Marxism, Victim Mentality and Social Justice Warrior have all gone mainstream. 

The constant barrage of news and information from the alternative media and citizen journalists has opened the eyes of many. So many, that the MSM and gate-keepers of late night TV are now permanently on the defense, trying desperately to discredit the truth movement. The more they try, the more they out themselves as the phony hypocrite sell-outs that they are. The sleeping masses are finally realizing that all of this change in the world is not some organic grassroots movement who time has come, but a carefully plotted globalist agenda meant to attack the pillars of our society, divide us and enslave us all.

It is this time, right now that the youth of today must unite and continue to speak out and fight the New World Order.


Related- How Kids Have Been Brainwashed all their Lives 

Communists purging conservatives from online platforms

March 5, 2018


Communists Purging Conservatives from Online Platforms

Clearly, the Communists that control the US economy have decided to exclude all those who resist induction into their cult. Yvonne Nachtogal relates how Paypal has cut her off.  It's against the law to refuse to bake a gay wedding cake but it's fine to deny Internet services to non-liberals. 

"To my mom, who grew up in East Germany under the Nazi's and then communism, it's all too familiar. When her father spoke out against Hitler, her family's financial support was cut off and they starved. My grandfather was arrested and died, conditions in jail having left him weak and sickly."

By Yvonne Nachtigal


We hear about censorship on Facebook and Youtube, even Twitter, but Paypal? Friday I received an email from the online-payment giant, notifying me that my account had been "limited" due to "the nature of activities" on my site,

 By "Limited" they meant that I cannot make purchases, receive or transfer money. I was asked to remove the Paypal button from the site and agree to their "acceptable use" terms, which I did. I'm waiting for the restrictions to be lifted, but I can no longer offer a Paypal button on my site.

I hadn't broken any of their acceptable use policies unless they're calling the truth about Kabbalah, Zionism, Freemasonry and Satanism "the promotion of hate." My site exposes evil on many fronts and presents the gospel of Jesus Christ as the only answer. It vilifies no race or people group because I believe the battle for truth to be a spiritual one that is blind to those things. God sees each individual heart. (Gal 3:28)

So what "activity" did Paypal find offensive? I've been unable to reach them for a definitive answer. As shocking as it might seem, I think it's safe to say that this is an example of the next level of censorship. Being unable to speak freely is foreign to people in the U.S. or other western countries, but not to those under oppressive governments. To my mom, who grew up in East Germany under the Nazi's and then communism, it's all too familiar. When her father spoke out against Hitler, her family's financial support was cut off and they starved. My grandfather was arrested and died, conditions in jail having left him weak and sickly. 


A young man from Egypt I spoke to just the other day said that in his country, "If you talk about the government, nothing happens for you (meaning financially). Then you have two choices: Do without, or leave if you can."

There are other online payment providers, but the trend in censorship is sobering. We're quickly approaching a time, in fact it's already here, when exposing the system will paint a target on our back. We must wake up to the fact that we're not in Kansas anymore. The stakes are very real and they are high. So we need to choose our battles and carefully count the cost. 

As a Christian I believe we do that by measure of the gospel of Jesus Christ, remembering that his kingdom is not of this world. (Jn 18:26) The world is deceived by Satan and is under his control. (Rev 12:9, I Jn 5:19)

In 1975, as an American teenager I visited my family in East Germany back when the iron curtain was still dividing the country. It was strange to me how my cousins whispered their thoughts about the government out of fear for the safety of their family.

Here we go...


Yvonne's Lawyer writes:

You're absolutely right...there's no legal grounds for PayPal's action against you. All they're doing is harassing you because you're a Christian and express anti-prevailing leadership views at every level (Masonic, Jewish, Papalistic, Judeo-Christian, etc., etc.). But, as you note, they get away with it because their coffers are unlimited, they control the medium (in this case, the payment portal), and they know you're not likely to challenge their action. You need what they have, they know it...."whatcha gonna do about it." Thugs. 

They don't take this position because they'll win in a legal challenge. They'll lose on the merits. But they know you're not likely to legally challenge them because it's prohibitively expensive and time-consuming. And if you should happen to challenge, they'll make you pay by dragging out the litigation on every imaginable technicality and procedural hurdle. The cases that you cited all go through the same process to come up with a publishable opinion. There's an underlying challenge in a state or federal court of original jurisdiction (think of this as the suit you have to file against PayPal to force their hand). That case lasts 1-3 years, gets resolved by a jury in favor of one or the other party, and then the losing party appeals. That underlying case probably cost each party conservatively anywhere from $200k-$600k in legal fees...chump change to thug corporations. And even then, the case doesn't make precedence that's publishable, as the cases you cited did. They have to go through many more hundreds of thousands of dollars in appeals and remands to the court of original jurisdiction to get a publishable opinion. 

Some folks might take the time to file suit and try to get a "quick" resolution within 6-12 months at a settlement conference....but even that would conservatively result in $50-$100k in litigation costs and attorneys' fees. These stakes are too high for 99.99999% of us...PayPal knows it.

Long and short - they know that most of us just want our money and we'll jump through their hoops to have the privilege of using their service to get it...even if it means they trample - and we surrender - our First Amendment rights. It's their game, they've rigged it, and we don't have the time, the financial backing, or the resources to legally challenge.


It won't happen overnight, as people's habits take time to change, but the recent purge of alternative voices on all of these platforms will soon backfire.

Very powerful, moneyed interests saw the danger an open internet represented, so they helped a few tech start-ups in the early days corral everyone into these ghettos. Now that they've essentially cornered the market, they feel emboldened to try and censor, and/or outright eliminate, voices THEY DON'T LIKE.

Decentralization is the key to solving this problem, and it's why peer-to-peer and blockchain technologies are vilified by most mainstream outlets. It represents the final death knell for the control freaks.

There are a number of alternatives blossoming as we speak. So, instead of waiting for the inevitable lawsuits to wind their way through the courts, or for the government to enact anti-trust legislation on these monopolies, take matters into your own hands.

For browsers, consider PaleMoon or Brave. Yes, both are a little buggy, but they're new and need some time to work out all the kinks. Hell, even try Explorer. Anything except Google Chrome.

For search, anything but Google. DuckDuckGo is a decent alternative, as is Bing. Again, it's about sending a message, so try to use a search engine not using Google on the back end, like StartPage.

There are many YouTube alternatives coming up. Try DTube/SteemitBitchute, etc. is another interesting up-and-coming Social Network.

The point here is to try and refrain from using the typical platforms. Yes, that even means Reddit.

ProtonMail is a secure and encrypted e-mail service you can use.

And, of course, there's Gab as an alternative to Twitter.

This is just the beginning, many more not listed here are just starting up. The information age is still in its infancy, and the days of monopolistic control are dying... good riddance.

Related Veteran's Today prposes a solution

Is this the Illuminati? A Review of "The Secret Jews"

March 4, 2018


Is this the Illuminati? review by Zulkifli Khair

THE international secret Jews community is explained objectively in this book by the outstanding Jewish leader and rabbi, Dr. Joachim Prinz who also wrote Dilemma of the Modern Jew and Popes from the Ghetto: A View of Medieval Christendom.

The community originally named as Marranos began in Spain since the fourth century. Then, after the Spanish Inquisition they spread around the world with the various name and different faith especially Christian and Islam. They are Judaizers; Christians or Muslims but practicing Judaism in secret (40).

Jadidim or originated Djedid al Islam is a Muslim Jewish community in Persia. "On the surface, they are practicing Mohammedans. They participate fully in the great pilgrimages to the holy places in the city" (6). Jadidim pray five times a day although the Jews pray only three times a day. They also fast during Ramadan. They bury their dead in the Muslim cemetery but wash the body in accordance with Jewish customs (6-7).

Another Muslim Jews are daggatus, the Jewish Bedouin of the Sahara. However, they know nothing of the Talmud and have very little knowledge about Jewish faith and customs (7-8). While doenmehs (the renegades) or ma'aminim (the true believers) are the Muslim Jews in Asia Minor. It began in 1686, when more than three hundred families converted to Islam in Salonika. In 1913, the doenmehs moved to Constantinople (118). Prinz concluded that the doenmeh or the Mohammedan Marrano is the product of the conversion of Shabtai Zvi in the seventeenth century (191).

"Among the leaders of the revolution which resulted in a more modern government in Turkey were Djavid Bey and Mustafa Kemal. Both were ardent doenmehs. David Bey became minister of finance; Mustafa Kemal became the leader of the new regime and he adopted the name of Atatürk. His opponents tried to use his doenmeh background to unseat him, but without success. Too many of the Young Turks in the newly formed revolutionary Cabinet prayed to Allah, but had as their real prophet Shabtai Zvi, the Messiah of Smyrna" (122).

"In Spain's attempt to make the entire country Christian, synagogues as well as mosques were often burned" (21). In Spain in 1256, an anti-Jewish policy was embodied in the Seven Part Code of Alfonso the Wise (21). In 1348, this code became the law of the land (22). Thousands of Jews were killed in Spain through the pogrom (26) in the name of the Spain's own crusade (25), and ended the "Golden Era" of Spanish Jews during "the hundreds of years of tolerant Arab rule" (26).

Later, within less than ten years, more than two hundred thousand Spanish Jews became Christians. In Valencia, for instance, all the survivors of the massacre converted (30). These Christian Marranos or chuetas intensively appeared in Spain and Portugal of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries (191). In the nineteenth century, there were about one hundred and twenty thousand Jews converted in Western Europe (32). However, the conversos during this time were not forced because of massacres or pogroms (32).

Prinz quoted Heinrich Heine, the German poet who considered his baptism as only as "the admission ticket to Western civilization" (32). Prinz also has presented how the great majority of the conversos did not become faithful Christians. The book which consists of seven chapters is begin with the saying of Solomon Ibn Verga (Jewish writer in 15th century): "It is no use to Your Majesty to pour Holy water on the Jews and call them Peter or Paul, while they adhere to their religion like Akiba or Tarphon. There is no advantage in their baptism except to make them overweening against true Christians and without fear, since outwardly they are accepted as Christians..." (Also in page 41).

As a great Rabbi, Dr. Joachim Prinz has evaluated various groups of secret Jews around the world in the perception of Jewish's thought and has discussed how they have transmitted the customs and traditions throughout the generations. However, the evaluation was not as refined as in The Marranos of Spain: From the Late 14th to the Early 16th Century, According to Contemporary Hebrew Sources authored by B. Netanyahu.

At one point of view, this community is very unique and extraordinary, they could have survived at every land they occupied successfully possessing higher status than the origin people. It is worth for me to get this valuable reference all the way from US by using services.