Direct Link to Latest News

Below- Best Pic "Chicago" Celebrated Jewish Duplicity (scroll down)

Subverted Amerika Spurns Patriots Like Alan Stang

July 19, 2018

stang-.jpg(Left, Three months before his death, Alan Stang talks about the need for the Tea Party to
adopt a program.) 

Alan Stang (1932-2009) died nine years ago today (July 19). For almost 50 years, the American people had no more stalwart and courageous defender than this man, who was born Jewish and converted to Christianity.  In his book, It's Very Simple, (1965) he exposed the "Civil Rights" Movement as Judeo-Masonic (Communist) subversion.

Because he opposed the Communist (Illuminati) conspiracy, he has been flushed down the memory hole. For 50 years of dedication and sacrifice, there is barely a decent obituary online, let alone a biography or Wikipedia article.  
This is the thanks true patriots get in Zionist Occupied Amerika. Luckily his articles and many broadcasts and books are still available. 


"I have been writ­ing about these mon­sters for some forty-five years. I know they have been com­mit­ting mon­strous atroc­i­ties for some two hun­dred years. I am tired of be­ing po­lite."

"My Language- Not for Sissies" (2007)
by Alan Stang

(Abridged by henrymakow.com) 

We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality - judiciously, as you will - we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.  (Ron Suskind, NYTimes Magazine, Oct. 17, 2004). Said by Karl Rove 

Some forty-five years ago, when I first be­came aware of the con­spir­acy for world dom­i­na­tion, took up my sword and shield in the bat­tle for Amer­ica and sal­lied forth to arouse oth­ers, I dis­cov­ered two kinds of people. Race, sex, eth­nic­ity and ed­u­ca­tion did not seem to mat­ter. The dif­fer­ence be­tween the two kinds cut through them all.

The first kind would tell me that he or she had long sus­pected some­thing was wrong but could­n't iden­tify it. Now that I had, every­thing came into fo­cus and they could. Now they could eas­ily pre­dict what would hap­pen, sim­ply be­cause they knew what had hap­pened be­fore. Even to­day I can still do that and mys­tify peo­ple, but it is so easy, so ob­vi­ous, I don't even think of it as pre­dict­ing.

In­deed, from time to time I still get mes­sages from peo­ple who say that when they first heard me talk, the shock was so great they knew I was crazy, but now that suf­fi­cient time has passed they re­al­ize that they are crazy too. One lady ac­tu­ally said that. "Guess what? Now I'm crazy too!"

...The sec­ond kind of prospect would lis­ten with half an ear, some­times less, and re­main un­con­vinced. "Prove it! Prove it!" I can hear one of them shout­ing. So I would go away and come back with more proof. But I never could per­suade them. The proof I pre­sented was never enough, or never enough of the right kind...

But they never did and I con­tin­ued to blame my­self, wast­ing pre­cious time. As you can prob­a­bly imag­ine, the frus­tra­tion was in­tense. Only grad­u­ally did the truth dawn that there was noth­ing wrong with me. There was some­thing wrong with them. Some of them were sim­ply too weak minded or in­tim­i­dated or cov­etous to face re­al­ity. Oth­ers may have been de­lib­er­ately try­ing to waste my time.

What­ever the rea­son, as the truth fi­nally dawned on me, I, of course, changed my method. Now, maybe once a year, I would stop by for a few min­utes to see whether they had made any progress, whether they had re­cov­ered from their delu­sions. Some­times they had; of­ten they had not. If not, I would cheer­fully go my way.

bushgannon.jpg

All of this again be­comes ger­mane - even more ger­mane - be­cause some read­ers who are too young to re­mem­ber it are now writ­ing to com­plain about my lan­guage. They like what I have to say but they can't pass it along be­cause if their prospects read in my pieces about "el pres­i­dente Jorge W. Boosh," about "Democruds" and "Re­pub­li­cruds," about "queers" and "fag­gots," they will in­stantly turn off. In­deed, the peo­ple who com­plain are al­most turned off them­selves. So, why do I use that lan­guage?...

So, for in­stance, the ap­pel­la­tion "el pres­i­dente Jorge W. Boosh" com­mu­ni­cates our aware­ness that Bush is com­mit­ting trea­son by con­duct­ing the pre­sent in­va­sion of our coun­try across the Mex­i­can bor­der. We know that be­cause if he were to pick up the phone and say, "Stop it at once!" it would stop at once. But he does not pick up the phone and say that. In the lat­est rev­e­la­tion, Boosh has gone into court to pre­vent the ex­e­cu­tion of a Mex­i­can who bragged about rap­ing and mur­der­ing two teenage girls. Boosh says the mon­ster is an il­le­gal alien and is pro­tected by treaty.

The ap­pel­la­tion also com­mu­ni­cates our ut­ter dis­gust for Boosh's true al­le­giance and con­tempt for the trai­tor. So, then, if all this is true, what is the prob­lem? The prob­lem is pre­cisely that it is true. It is em­bar­rass­ing. The peo­ple who won't look at it - won't face it - can't. The sim­ple truth is too fright­ful. That is why the word "fag­got" of­fends them. In my new book, Not Holier Than Thou: How Queer is Bush? I ex­plain that the anx­i­ety such words cause is proof they have been brain­washed. 

The same con­sid­er­a­tions would ap­ply to my char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of the Com­mu­nist Broad­cast­ing Sys­tem's re­volt­ing Mike Wal­lace, whose show I once wrote, as "snot drip­ping from the nose of a skid row drunk," and "dog vomit filled with mag­gots the dog is lap­ping up." It was Mike who said at a con­fer­ence on jour­nal­is­tic ethics that he would not warn a Ma­rine Corps com­man­der of an up­com­ing am­bush, be­cause to do so would dam­age his jour­nal­is­tic "im­par­tial­ity." What else could you call this skunk?

There is still an­other rea­son for such in­flam­ma­tory lan­guage. Yes, it in­fu­ri­ates. It is cal­cu­lated to in­fu­ri­ate the reader and arouse. It is meant to con­vey the fact that we are not en­gaged in an ide­o­log­i­cal dis­cus­sion here; this is not a uni­ver­sity de­bate. We are at war. Aided by do­mes­tic trai­tors, a for­eign power is at­tack­ing and in­vad­ing our coun­try. There has been blood­shed. There have been ca­su­al­ties. I am not talk­ing about Iraq. Iraq is a dis­tant front in the war. I am talk­ing about New York. I am talk­ing about Seat­tle. We are in the mid­dle of the most dan­ger­ous na­tional emer­gency in our his­tory.

Also, friends, again, I have been writ­ing about these mon­sters for some forty-five years. I know they have been com­mit­ting mon­strous atroc­i­ties for some two hun­dred years. I am tired of be­ing po­lite. How many more ways can one write about them; how many other things can one say? And what you like to read is now ir­rel­e­vant.

I said above that what I was talk­ing about all those many years ago is even more ger­mane to­day. Why? Back then, the con­spir­acy for world gov­ern­ment was more con­cealed, ad­mit­tedly harder to see. It was not yet strong enough to re­veal it­self com­pletely. To­day, as the late, great Robert Welch once put it, the con­spir­acy is nec­es­sar­ily "run­ning naked to the fin­ish line." Be­cause it is so close, it is eas­ier to see.

Which means that the peo­ple who to­day refuse to see, the quib­blers, are more cul­pa­ble than their spir­i­tual prog­en­i­tors. They have much less ex­cuse. In mind's eye now I imag­ine them, like the ladies at that wom­en's club, el­e­gantly dressed and coif­feured, cute, lit­tle nap­kins on their knees, eat­ing fin­ger sand­wiches, quib­bling about ex­actly how to say it, as if what we're talk­ing about has noth­ing to do with them, as if they can choose whether or not to be­come in­volved. And they are do­ing that while ac­tual rapists are break­ing into their beau­ti­fully dec­o­rated meet­ing room, in­tend­ing to drag them by their beau­ti­fully frosted hair into the street.

So I be­lieve I can re­as­sure the he­roes who will­ingly en­dure the schiz­o­phrenic frus­tra­tion of try­ing to con­vince block­head fel­low cit­i­zens that some­thing is fa­tally wrong in our coun­try, let alone con­vince them it is bad enough to en­list in the war.  I have dis­cov­ered over more than 40 years in the strug­gle that if my lan­guage were as pris­tine as Shirley Tem­ple's in her prime, and my us­ages as con­tem­pla­tive as the Dalai Lama's, these brit­tle folks would find some­thing else to dis­suade them...

------------

Alan Stang was one of Mike Wallace's original writers at Channel 13 in New York, where he wrote some of the scripts that sent Mike to CBS. Stang has been a radio talk show host himself. In Los Angeles, he went head to head nightly with Larry King, and, according to Arbitron, had almost twice as many listeners. He has been a foreign correspondent. He has written hundreds of feature magazine articles in national magazines and some fifteen books. 
His first book, It's Very Simple: The True Story of Civil Rights, (1965) was an instant best-seller. His first novel, The Highest Virtue, (1974) set in the Russian Revolution, won smashing reviews and five stars, top rating, from the West Coast Review of Books.

Stang has lectured in every American state and around the world and has guested on many top shows, including CNN's CrossFire

Makow interview with Alan Stang 


First Comment from Marco A

I often say, "Someone who is genuine and has something truthful to say will languish away in obscurity."

Alan Slang was obviously one of these characters. Our masters do not need to eliminate true scholars anymore, they simply ensure they receive zero publicity until they pine away in frustration and despair. 

Jordan Peterson, Steven Molyneux, Paul Joseph Watson and the rest of you disgusting charlatans and imposters take note. 

"...we are not engaged in an ideological discussion here; this is not a university debate. We are at war." 

Thank you. 

I'm so sick of all these alternative media self-declared experts who make elaborate arguments, not in the attempt to convey a truth but more often only convince weak minds of their pseudo-intelligence. 

If you have no passion and only lap up world issues to increase your follower base to ensure your own worldly success - you are not genuine and are useless in this war... you aren't even in it, you profit off it in monetary and social gain. 

These people have nothing in common with us true warriors who hate this new world order and who would bleed to see the innocent in this world free from this lions mouth. People like us are too dangerous to receive publicity because we have righteous indignation and know the whole truth and are willing to say it. 

If you aren't interested in truly fighting but are only an effeminate fake scholar and an attention whore - do all us real warriors a favour and fuck off.









You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2018/07/alan-stang.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Below - Book Reopens Question of Jewish-Nazis Collaboration (scroll down)

Best Pic "Chicago" Celebrated Jewish Duplicity

July 17, 2018

images (99).jpeg

"Don't shoot, I am alone," a husband pleads after his wife catches him in bed with two naked women in the movie Chicago. "Believe what I tell you, not what you see," 

Jewish Cabalism is based on the premise that truth is defined by their self-interest. There is no objective truth. They are God. Increasingly, our world reflects this Cabalist Jewish solipsism. They invent "Russian meddling" while the truth is classified as "fake news." 

The Masonic Jewish media was totally discredited during the election campaign. But instead of reforming, they're doubling down. 

Cabalism is Satanism and Satanism inverts truth and falsehood (as well as good and evil.) The 2002 Best Picture Chicago was a Jewish inside joke where they celebrated their own chutzpah, chicanery and the dimwitted goyim. 


from Dec 5, 2016

By Henry Makow Ph.D.


"Don't shoot, I am alone," a husband pleads with his wife after she catches him in bed with two naked women.

"But I can see two women," she objects.

"Don't believe what you see," he instructs her. "Believe what I tell you."

The wife shoots her husband in this scene from the 2002 movie musical "Chicago". But the show is dedicated to the cynical premise that the public is not so astute.

"Chicago" was written by the author of "Cabaret", Fred Ebb. Where the mantra of "Cabaret" is "money makes the world go round," the sequel proclaims power turns on deception, connections and media control.

It is significant that when half of Americans suspect Zionists of doing 9-11, a movie that celebrates Jewish duplicity received 13 Oscar nominations and won "Best Picture."

"Chicago" epitomizes the bogus Cabalist religion of secular humanism (Satanism) that morality and truth are man-made and relative, rather than Divine and absolute. This is the cause of our cultural and moral malaise.

It raises questions about the relationship of organized Jewry to the elite, and Jews to their own religion. According to Irving Kristol, Jews in America "proudly identify themselves as Jews but their religion, for the most part, is only Jewish in its externals. At the core, it is secular humanist." (The Future of American Jewry)

THE STORY

"Chicago" is set on Death Row in Chicago's Women's Jail, where women who killed cheating husbands brazenly proclaim, "He had it coming."

"Roxie Hart," wife of Amos, murdered her lover because he promised to advance her singing career but dumped her instead.

Billy-Flynn-chicago-the-movie-2943050-852-480.jpg

"Irish" lawyer Billy Flynn is the only person who can save Roxie's neck. He has never lost a case. Luckily, Flynn is money-minded and accepts a reduced fee from Roxie's devoted cuckold husband. Richard Gere, aged for this role and actually made to look Jewish, plays Flynn. By calling him"Irish" the play's creators pass off Jewish experience as American experience.

Flynn's practice is to invent a crowd-pleasing story about his client, and create media hysteria. There is an eerie scene where Flynn is a giant puppeteer controlling dozens of puppet-reporters. Another evocative scene shows him as a ventriloquist voicing Roxie Hart's words. (Imagine Obama on his lap.) Finally, there are the winks and Masonic hand signals he gives the judge suggesting corruption.

Flynn tells Roxie: "You got nothing to worry about. It's all a circus, kid. A three-ring circus. This trial, the whole world all show business. But kid you're working with a star, the biggest!

Give 'em the old razzle dazzle...
What if your hinges are all a rusting?
What if, in fact, you're just disgusting?
Razzle dazzle 'em.
And they'll never catch wise!
How can they hear the truth above the roar?
Throw 'em a fake and a finagle
They'll never know you're just a bagel...
They let ya get away with murder..."

To drive home the point, another inmate, a devout Hungarian Catholic woman does not have the money or the "smarts" to hire Billy Flynn. We see her praying to Jesus Christ but Jesus does not help her. She goes to the gallows. We see her swing. We see them take her coffin away. The Christian is a loser.

 The Jury is out. The newspapers have printed two batches with headlines GUILTY and INNOCENT. The audience knows Roxie is guilty. She killed a man with a wife and five small children just because he had her without paying the price.

If Hollywood were doing what it should, Roxie would be found guilty. The world would be portrayed as a place where Billy Flynn's chicanery does not prevail, where you can't "get away with murder."

But Roxie is found innocent, of course. In Cabalism, this is the way the world works. Anything else would be preachy. But, isn't this preaching too? Doesn't the religion create the world we live in? This movie preaches that moral corruption (Satanism) is trendy, fun and sexy.


REALITY IS WHATEVER WE SAY IT IS

Roxie Hart and her partner, Velma Kelly, another of Flynn's satisfied clients, take to the stage. "Thank you for your belief in our innocence," they say in the Finale. "You know, a lot of people have lost faith in America. And for what America stands for. But we are the living examples of what a wonderful country this is."

Brazen, n'est ce pas? It's as if, in their view, corruption and exploitation is what America is "great" for. 

It's both logical and frightening that the mass media is controlled by people who believe in creating a false and perverted reality. 

Is the world "a three-ring circus" because the Jewish God is Lucifer?

-----

Brendon O'Connell on Star Trek- The Last Jedi 


Politically Correct Movie Making | Star Wars: The Last Jedi - the most divisive film ever? - BBC News 


Reading the fan reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, other gripes stand out.

"It's corny, stupid and politically correct," wrote one.

"So caught up in being diverse and political, it forgets to tell a coherent and compelling story," wrote another.

Empire's Helen O'Hara explains: "There were many more characters in this installment that weren't white men, and that has been a shift that some fans have found unconsciously upsetting or alienating. They've felt excluded by that.

"And some men have openly complained that there are too many girls running around the Star Wars universe, which I personally think is crazy."

I wonder when the "sociology social programmers" will realize they are fighting a billion-year-old archetypal human instinct pattern which made "the hero's journey" in the original Star Wars so compelling and attractive - knight rescues the fair maiden from the dragon. What is it now Henry - incompetent knight has a nervous breakdown, fair maiden ropes down castle wall and carries him to safety?








You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/000973.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Best Pic "Chicago" Celebrated Jewish Duplicity"

WILLIAM B said (July 18, 2018):

We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality – judiciously, as you will – we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” (Ron Suskind, NYTimes Magazine, Oct. 17, 2004). Said by Karl Rove.


David S said (July 18, 2018):

Nice article: "Chicago."

Re: "We see her praying to Jesus Christ but Jesus does not help her. " (Maybe he did...)

I wonder if the powers that be (e.g., the Israeli 8200 program) leave you alone because in the world of cyberwarfare and control, your email activity acts as a honeypot in identifying people with certain opinions.

I am too old to care. I was a philosemite (e.g., I was an ardent ROFTER) that became a little red-pilled, that's all. I simply gave up my naivete--mainly because of the animosity that workplace Jews had for me--much to my shock.

I have no hatred of Jews. They need their ethnostate and so do Europeans--and so does everyone else, actually. If some really want to persecute me in the future for this reason (and I do not know that that is the case)--so be it. More Heaven for me. I have enough on my plate learning how to deal with the "persecution" for being a government whistleblower.


JJ said (December 6, 2016):

Even though I've never seen it, and don't plan to, everything is spot on, but I do take exception to this:
The God of the Old Testament is capricious, xenophobic and often barbaric. He demands human sacrifices and promises to slaughter Israel's enemies. He is sometimes mystical and good but often mysterious and unknowable.

That's what I used to think as a "baby Christian," early in my walk, but after growing in faith and the reading of God's word, especially the OT, the narrative becomes more clear. There are two forces at work, and God wants us to search and know Him above all; he grew tired of sacrifices early on. Satan created entire races of people that had to be destroyed. His own people turned against Him. His New Covenant seems a given, but it's a fulfillment of the old. Same God, always.

OK, but on the topic of the Hollywood narrative, another series from HBO summed it up so well that I had to stop watching it in the 3rd or 4th season, "Boardwalk Empire." The villain is a white male Christian fed who murders a Jew fed by drowning him while baptizing in the river while a black congregation watches. They later identify him as the culprit. The bootleggers and corrupt politicians are the good guys, except for one who is seen reading a copy of "The International Jew" Henry Ford magazine (played by Dabney Coleman).

I really liked some aspects of the show, but there's only so much I could take.


Below- Reclaiming Male Power (scroll down)

Book Reopens Question of Jewish-Nazis Collaboration

chari.jpg
Poland's Holocaust Law. which bans blaming Poland for the Jewish halocaust, raises the question of Jewish culpability. 

In a review of a book, From Ghetto to Deathcamp
below, by a Jewish Ghetto policeman, Jan Pekzkis shows that Jews may face more guilt
than Poles, many of whom actually protected Jews. 

In his book, Holocaust Victims Accuse, Rabbi Shonfeld called the Zionists "war criminals" who usurped the leadership of the Jewish people, betrayed their trust, and after their annihilation, reaped the moral capital.  The more Jews died, the stronger the moral case for Israel.

In the 1960's the Jewish philosopher, Hannah Arendt was slandered and ostracized when she concluded from Hilberg that "almost without exception" the Jewish leadership cooperated with the Nazis.







by Jan Pekzkis
(henrymakow.com) 


We hear a lot nowadays of "Polish complicity in the Holocaust" and so, in the same spirit, we must fairly inquire about "Jewish complicity in the Holocaust". I analyze this book in the broader context of the implications of collaboration with the Germans (Nazis). In doing so, I try to avoid the usual double standard, wherein a Pole who in some way assisted the Nazis in persecuting the Jews is reckoned a collaborator, but a Jew who in some way assisted the Nazis in persecuting the Jews is not reckoned a collaborator.

Collaboration is usually defined as willfully performing deeds in service of the enemy, at the expense of one's countrymen, in exchange for favors from the enemy, for one's personal benefit. Nowadays, Jewish collaboration is arbitrarily and sweepingly defined-away by means of the mystification of the Holocaust and especially the "All Jews were victims of the Nazis" meme. 

And, although Chari does not consider himself a collaborator, others certainly did. Thus, Jewish ghetto policemen were widely resented, by other Jews, during and after the war. (p. 68). Upon arriving at Auschwitz, Chari wisely did not wear his police uniform, because the Jewish inmates commonly killed arriving Jewish ghetto policemen on the spot. (p. 84). Chari also expressed concern that the liberating Soviets would send him to Siberia as a Nazi collaborator. (p. 77).

I first consider the meme of "choiceless choices"--a common but very overgeneralized line of exculpation for Jews who served the Nazis. From there, I examine less clear-cut situations--ones involving long-term survival under a brutal enemy.

THE MANY PERKS OF BEING A JEWISH GHETTO POLICEMAN

Anatol Chari writes, "I was a policeman from autumn, 1942, when the SONDERKOMMANDO force was enlarged, until late summer, 1944, when the Lodz ghetto was liquidated...Wearing the uniform gave you a sense of authority and prestige. In a ghetto filled with nobodies, you were a somebody. We walked into stores that were off-limits to the general population. We received special ration cards, which meant larger rations, better quality food, and no standing in a long line at the general distribution store. My grandparents and I would get enough to eat. Sonders [SONDERKOMMANDO] didn't have to worry about being deported--at least not at first--and we didn't have to perform difficult physical labor. We were the food police, with lots of opportunities to organize extra food. This wasn't a dog guarding the apples. This was a dog guarding the meat!" (p. 46).

THE MYTH OF THE KILL-OR-BE-KILLED CHOICELESS CHOICE IN SHIPPING JEWS TO THE DEATH CAMPS

It is commonly, but erroneously, supposed that the Jewish ghetto policeman obeyed the Germans, in loading and dispatching his fellow Jews to the death camps, out of a desperate attempt to avoid his own death in being sent there himself. The facts are otherwise.

Anatol Chari, the Jewish ghetto policeman, implicates himself in the roundup and loading of Jews onto the trains. (e. g, p. 73). However, in doing so, he could not possibly have been trying to save his own life, for the simple reason that he did not realize--at least not fully--that boarding the train was usually synonymous with death! He thus candidly admits that "We didn't know where the transports went, we didn't know about the gas vans and gas chambers, so a person could pretend it was just a new work assignment." (p. 73).

To be sure, there were indirect clues, such as the initially-exclusive shipment of the young, old, and infirm (inconsistent with labor requirements at the destination); the arrival of bullet-ridden clothing; and (later, in 1944), notes in the returning empty trains with "We are at Auschwitz. It's not good." (p. 73, 76). 

However, by Chari's own admission (p. 73), the Jews were usually in denial in the face of these clues. (p. 73). In addition, according to Chari, "Most people in Lodz had never even heard of it, so 'Auschwitz' meant nothing to us." (p. 76). Consequently, the Jews, of the Lodz ghetto at least, had at most a vague concept of their impending collective annihilation. Clearly, their collaborative acts with the Germans could not have been motivated by a desperation in the face of an annihilation that they did not believe in.

THE "GET ENOUGH FOOD ANY WAY POSSIBLE" CONSIDERATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR JEWS--AND POLES

At no time did Chari face immediate death if he failed to perform a collaborative act, but the performance of such acts increased his likelihood of survival in the long-term sense. However, the reader must realize that this is true of collaborators in general: Other factors being equal, performing deeds in service to the enemy generally increases one's chances of surviving the enemy occupation!

Anatol Chari thus accounts for his conduct in serving the Germans as a Jewish ghetto policeman, "I'm not claiming to be innocent of selfish behavior. But everyone was trying to survive as best they could under conditions not meant for survival. I'll say again if you only ate the standard allotment of food, you weren't going to live. If you did live, if you made it through the ghetto, and through the camps after the ghetto, if you came out alive, then you couldn't have been among the worst off in the ghetto. If you really had it bad, you're not here to tell about it." (p. 68).

Thus, Chari did not face immediate death from hunger, but the acquisition of sufficient food for survival was a long-term problem. However, Poles also did not get enough food allotments on which to live long-term! They functioned under near-starvation conditions under the brutal German occupation and were forced to resort to black market activity in order to acquire sufficient food to remain alive. Not surprisingly, some also turned to collaboration.

If Chari can validly adopt a "get sufficient food no matter what" mindset, then so can the much-condemned Pole who betrayed a fugitive Jew in exchange for a bag of sugar from the Germans. Or the Pole who got some the fugitive Jew's belongings in return for denouncing him to the Germans. The booty would be used by the Pole to barter on the black market for sufficient food in order to help survive long-term. [Jewish-denouncing Polish acts, featured above, were very much distorted in the media-acclaimed writings of neo-Stalinist authors such as Jan T. Gross and Jan Grabowski vel Abrahamer, as manifestations of (what else?) Polish anti-Semitism. They were not.]

Both the Jewish and Polish German-serving acts involved win-lose situations in which the collaborator sought to win at the expense of some Jew. Thus, Chari's appropriation of more than his share of food diminished the survivorship of other Jews, because it meant that there was less food available to them. This is no less true than the Pole, who denounced a Jew in order to directly or indirectly get more food for himself, thereby diminishing the survivorship of the Jews he denounced.


HOLOCAUST ENVY? VICTIMHOOD COMPETITION? THE GYPSIES (SINTI AND ROMA), AND NOT THE JEWS, WIN THE VICTIM TROPHY

The author describes the Lodz Ghetto about 1942, "The Germans treated Gypsies worse than they treated the Jews." (p. 42).

Now consider the year 1944, in Auschwitz, after liquidation of the Lodz Ghetto. "Jews, with their red and yellow Star of David, were at the bottom the pecking order. Only Gypsies were lower." (p. 86).

"JEWISH PASSIVITY": PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Consider the situation at Ahlem, located near Hildesheim, and in the area of Bergen Belsen. "Third, we had the night shift and weren't closely supervised. The Germans thought that non-Jewish prisoners--Poles, Ukrainers [Ukrainians], Russians--were more likely to escape, so only Jews worked at night." (p. 133).

For other examples of Poles deliberately being guarded, by the Germans, more strongly than Jews, see Harvest of Hate.

NO SELF-CONSISTENT NAZI GERMAN POLICIES ON LAST-MINUTE KILLINGS OF JEWS

As the Third Reich was collapsing in 1945, the Germans killed Jewish inmates in some locations, while at other locations they did not. In addition, the Germans often killed non-Jewish inmates. Thus, the authors write, "In 2009, quite by accident, Tony learned of a victims memorial in Radogoszcz, a suburb of Lodz, where a Gestapo prison once stood. In January, 1945, the day before Soviet troops arrived, the Germans set fire to the prison, killing hundreds of Polish prisoners." (p. 185).


---

MORE ON JEWS WHO SERVED THE NAZIS:

(Click on, and read my reviews of):

Ordinary Jews: Choice and Survival during the Holocaust 

Israel's Holocaust and the Politics of Nationhood (Cambridge Middle East Studies)

A Narrow Bridge to Life: Jewish Slave Labor and Survival in the Gross-Rosen Camp System, 1940-1945

International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law (The Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law)

The Holocaust in Israeli Public Debate in the 1950s: Ideology and Memory

A Surplus of Memory : Chronicle of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising(Hardback) - 1993 Edition

Gates of Tears: The Holocaust in the Lublin District

Kasztners Crime (Jewish Studies)

The Portable Hannah Arendt (Penguin Classics)

See also:

Jewish Honor Courts: Revenge, Retribution, and Reconciliation in Europe and Israel after the Holocaust

How to Accept German Reparations (Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights)

Eichmann in Jerusalem : A Report on the Banality of Evil (Revised and Enlarged)

.
.
To see my reviews of works on the Lodz Ghetto and other ghettos in German-occupied Poland, see:

http://a.co/8rNIRJE







You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2018/07/book-reopens-question.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Tongue in Cheek?- Journalist's Call for Curfew for Men is another Example of Misandry

July 15, 2018


curfew.jpeg
Tongue in Cheek?- Journalist's Call for Curfew for Men is another Example of Misandry

A female reader, GK responds 


When I saw this headline, "A Curfew For Men,"   I almost passed out.  

The author, Melinda Houston, thinks it's an awesome idea to dictate to men when and where they should be permitted to show up.  She is referencing a suggestion from a letter by one Gretel Lamont, of which my cursory search came up empty-handed.  The suggestion "... is simply to ban all men from being on the streets or on public transport after, say, 9.30pm..." 

She says that this restriction is already in place for women.  Well, that's Australia, so I can't prove it either way.  And most know how one country affects another and mind-sets ooze across continents. Also, the controllers set up test cases here and there, just to see what will fly and we become the test cases for their little experiments.

This proposal is the worst attack on the male character and male freedom that I've ever witnessed because it goes beyond accusing to actually attempting to restrict movement, to cage up, so to speak.  I feel both infuriated and heart-broken.  Heart-broken, because of all the good men in my life, from father to husband, etc.  All I see is how much they give, how hard they work, how decent they are, how important to so many areas of life.  Separatists are THE DUMBEST PEOPLE IN THE UNIVERSE, ANY UNIVERSE!!

Infuriated?  Yes!!  And selfishly so.  They want to remove from me that which completes me, compliments me, protects me, and so much more.  This is messing with Creation itself!!  The Great Balance that keeps sanity and cohesion afloat.  Now I ask, when will it stop!!? T

he author's last paragraph practically begs that this restricting of men becomes law.  To my brothers, I say, I will defend you forever, for you have defended me for millennia.  This evil aberration will be eviscerated.



The nitty-gritty on Fed shenanigans

July 8, 2018



collusion2.jpg
The nitty-gritty on Fed shenanigans during and after the credit crunch

by Amazon reader

 Nomi Prins doesn't sensationalize or create fear porn. This entire volume is written very practically. I will warn readers up front that there is a lot of banking and financial terminology and acronyms. There's a glossary to help but it may be a bit of a challenge if you are completely unfamiliar with the banking system.

Rather than offer a summary, I'm going to offer a couple of quotes directly from the book that do well presenting the overall theme:

- "By conjuring money, the Fed had begun something it couldn't stop." - p. 223

- "Nowhere in any of this did the plight of ordinary citizens meaningfully feature in the discussion." - p. 224

- "This coddling of the oppressors depicted the illogic of a situation that hurt all those involved to some degree - except the central bankers themselves. It was the central banking establishment that had no real allegiance to voters and that remained virtually untouchable." - p. 242

Basically, in 2007/2008, a fiscal crisis erupted, with the epicenter being the United States. This crisis was in part caused by the deregulation of the banking industry during the Clinton Administration, including the repeal of the Glass-Steigal act. Though many who have been following the system are aware of that, Prins gets into detail of why this is true. It lead to out of control "betting" utilizing people's deposits. This "betting" included subprime loans, derivative markets (including derivatives from toxic assets), and so on. When it all came to a head, the bankers went to governments to bail them out. And they did. And the banks made out big time but Main Street did not. And then central banks pushed money conjuring (QE) for a trickle down effect. It didn't work. Banks hoarded it and bet on more derivatives. So the central banks keep doing the same thing and have for about a decade with the same effect.

The author does a great job in presenting the elitism of the central bankers, the revolving door between banking positions and government positions, the fact that the bankers are less and less accountable to governments and that governments are more and more held hostage by those bankers. This book should be on the reading list for every college student out there, but it won't be.

Political Trigger Warning: The author does not speak highly of any American administration, whether it be Bush, Obama, or Trump. So if you are in love with any of these presidents, you will be triggered.

The greatest threat to America and American Jewish communities is Israel by Brendon O'Connell

June 29, 2018

unnamed (22).jpg












The greatest threat to America and American Jewish communities is Israel.

Gold means nothing. Its as "fiat" as paper. It's technology that matters.

by Brendon O'Connell
(henrymakow.com)


One of the "reserve currency's" people forget about is the US 5th and 6th Fleet. If only good American Generals of a Patton or McArthur caliber were running them.

Also, the US has the greatest technological lead on anyone on the planet - ever. The US made an all titanium super plane that cruised at 80,000+ feet at Mach 3.2 (conservative figure) with state of the art never matched turbo ramjet engines that has never been matched by today's standards (that we know of). The US innovation kings at Lockheed's Skunk Works managed that when? 1964. Fifty four years ago. 

Technology is king. He who detects first. Shoots first. At the longest range - wins. No one comes close to America. 

Everything China and the USSR have was handed to them on a platter. The USSR could not feed itself, clothe itself, nor fire a rocket into space until it was handed to them. And before people mock the US space program's rocky start, one might consider the same Communist Jews and sayanim who gave the secrets of the atom bomb to Stalin were also sabotaging the US space program. 

The greatest threat to America and American Jewish communities is Israel. A Soviet Communist Rothschild invention designed to subvert America under a Biblical cover. It was a Socialist Marxist state from day one and American Jews like Jack Bernstein exposed it many years ago. Professor Israel Shahak exposed it in the must read, "Jewish Religion Jewish History The Weight Of Three Thousand Years." Sir Douglas Reid exposed it with "Controversy Of Zion."

Now Israel has the keys to the kingdom. They brag they wrote crucial code for Windows 10. They brag they design and fabricate the latest Intel CPU's there and we know they are hardware backdoored with the Intel Management Engine add on. They brag they lead the world in cyber security. They brag they lead the world in nano technology. They brag they have teamed up with China and Russia and they brag they lead the BRICS and Belt and Road $7.2 trillion Pan Eurasian Stalinist era dream development.

Gold means nothing. Its as "fiat" as paper. Its technology. And the Soviet Communist biblical imposter Israel just removed the US high technology sector to itself and gave the finger to the US taxpayers. Just like they dumped manufacturing and heavy industry in China.

Israel, Russia and China are Rothschild City of London creations. Partners in crime. Setting up the high tech Smart Cities/Gulag system to lock away the Woken Goy and sacrifice Jews world wide who will not move to the coming Greater Israel project.

Communism was always Jewish Talmudism. Now it comes with flowers, a backdoored Israeli Arc processor and personal robot helper in a Smart Gulag. And just like the late 1930's, Jews in America especially, can either get with the program or face a rampaging US citizenry from a collapsed US economy.

Only the US military can save America. But who will it work for? When we see AIPAC and JINSA and ADL operatives arrested - Shelden Adelson and Netanyahu on the wanted list - maybe we can all breath easy. I'd be optimistic, but certainly dont hold your breath.

The world economy is not the problem - the financial system is. Its a fraud. But there is plenty to eat, drink and build with..iron ore, nickel. The financial collapse is a choice. There is an abundance of everything. Just not hope - the thing they crush first.