Joe Sobran: The Jewish Establishment (1995)
July 20, 2019
(left, Joe Sobran, 1946-2010)
How does a tiny country like Israel control the most powerful country on earth, the USA? Israel is the Rothschild's personal fiefdom - their army, nuclear arsenal and secret service. The Rothschilds produce US currency in the form of a debt to themselves. This is something the US and all countries could do themselves debt and interest free. The US is the Rothschild's bitch. Indeed anyone who wishes to succeed must be a witting or unwitting collaborator in the Rothschild's scam. They must enslave mankind in order to protect it. That is the essence of Communism.
For essays like "The Jewish Faction," Joe Sobran, an editor at the National Review, was fired, which only proves his point.
No country that allows its banking system to be controlled by its arch enemies can expect to remain free. The world has been colonized by the central banking cartel using Freemasonry & Organized Jewry as its instruments. He says "Jews" think they're persecuted when in fact their leaders persecute mankind. This has become evident as Westerners see their cultural values, freedom and security eroded, and genocide encouraged by migration and miscegenation.
"At any rate, Christians knew from the start how the Tribe felt about them, and nothing has changed since then except that today's Christians have become remarkably naive about it. Christ tells us to forgive our enemies, but he doesn't ask us to pretend that they are our friends... "
The Jewish Establishment (Sept. 1995)
by Joe Sobran
(Excerpt by henrymakow.com)
The Jewish establishment, it hardly needs saying, is predominantly secularist and systematically anti-Christian. In fact, it is unified far more by its hostility to Christianity than by its support of Israel, on which it is somewhat divided. The more left-wing Jews are faintly critical of Israel, though never questioning its "right to exist" -- that is, its right to exist on terms forbidden to any Christian country; that is, its right to deny rights to non-Jews.
A state that treated Jews as Israel treats gentiles would be condemned outright as Nazi-like. But Israel is called "democratic," even "pluralistic."
Explicitly "Jewish" organizations like the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League enforce a dual standard. What is permitted to Israel is forbidden to America.
This is not just thoughtless inconsistency. These organizations consciously support one set of principles here -- equal rights for all, ethnic neutrality, separation of church and state -- and their precise opposites in Israel, where Jewish ancestry and religion enjoy privilege. They "pass" as Jeffersonians when it serves their purpose, espousing rules that win the assent of most Americans. At the same time, they are bent on sacrificing the national interest of the United States to the interests of Israel, under the pretense that both countries' interests are identical. (There is, of course, no countervailing American lobby in Israel.)
The single most powerful Jewish lobbying group is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which, as its former director Thomas Dine openly boasted, controls Congress. At a time when even Medicare may face budget cuts, aid to Israel remains untouchable. If the Israelis were to begin "ethnic cleansing" against Arabs in Israel and the occupied lands, it is inconceivable that any American political figure would demand the kind of military strike now being urged against the Serbs in ex-Yugoslavia.
Jewish-owned publications like the Wall Street Journal, The New Republic, The Atlantic Monthly, U.S. News & World Report, the New York Post, and New York's Daily News emit relentless pro-Israel propaganda; so do such pundits as William Safire, A.M. Rosenthal, Charles Krauthammer, Jeane Kirkpatrick, and George Will, to name a few.
That Israel's journalistic partisans include so many gentiles -- lapsed goyim, you might say -- is one more sign of the Jewish establishment's power. So is the fact that this fact isn't mentioned in public (though it is hardly unnoticed in private.)
ANTI-SEMITE AS CURSE
So is the fear of being called "anti-Semitic." Nobody worries about being called "anti-Italian" or "anti-French" or "anti-Christian"; these aren't words that launch avalanches of vituperation and make people afraid to do business with you.
It's pointless to ask what "anti-Semitic" means. It means trouble. It's an attack signal. The practical function of the word is not to define or distinguish things, but to conflate them indiscriminately -- to equate the soberest criticism of Israel or Jewish power with the murderous hatred of Jews. And it works. Oh, how it works.
When Joe McCarthy accused people of being Communists, the charge was relatively precise. You knew what he meant. The accusation could be falsified. In fact the burden of proof was on the accuser: when McCarthy couldn't make his loose charges stick, he was ruined. (Of course, McCarthy was hated less for his "loose" charges than for his accurate ones. His real offense was stigmatizing the Left.)
The opposite applies to charges of "anti-Semitism." The word has no precise definition. An "anti-Semite" may or may not hate Jews. But he is certainly hated by Jews. There is no penalty for making the charge loosely; the accused has no way of falsifying the charge, since it isn't defined.
A famous example. When Abe Rosenthal accused Pat Buchanan of "anti-Semitism," everyone on both sides understood the ground rules. There was a chance that Buchanan would be ruined, even if the charge was baseless. And there was no chance that Rosenthal would be ruined -- even if the charge was baseless.
Such are the rules. I violate them, in a way, even by spelling them out.
"Anti- Semitism" is therefore less a charge than a curse, an imprecation that must be uttered formulaically. Being a "bogus predicate," to use Gilbert Ryle's phrase, it has no real content, no functional equivalent in plain nouns and verbs. Its power comes from the knowledge of its potential targets, the gentiles, that powerful people are willing to back it up with material penalties.
In other words, journalists are as afraid of Jewish power as politicians are. This means that public discussion is cramped and warped by unspoken fear -- a fear journalists won't acknowledge, because it embarrasses their pretence of being fearless critics of power. When there are incentives to accuse but no penalties for slander, the result is predictable.
What is true of "anti-Semitism" is also true to a lesser degree of other bogus predicates like "racism," "sexism," and "homophobia." Other minorities have seen and adopted the successful model of the Jewish establishment. And so our public tongue has become not only Jewish-oriented but more generally minority-oriented in its inhibitions.
The illusion that we enjoy free speech has been fostered by the breaking of Christian taboos, which has become not only safe but profitable. To violate minority taboos is "offensive" and "insensitive"; to violate Christian taboos -- many of them shared by religious Jews -- is to be "daring" and "irreverent." ("Irreverence," of course, has become good.)
DUAL LOYALTIES
Jewry, like Gaul, may be divided into three parts, each defined by its borders vis-à-vis the gentile world. There are the Orthodox, who not only insist on borders but wear them. They often dress in attire that sets them apart; they are even willing to look outlandish to gentiles in order to affirm their identity and their distinctive way of life. At the other extreme are Jews who have no borders, who may (or may not) assimilate and intermarry, whose politics may range from left to right, but who in any case accept the same set of rules for everyone. I respect both types.
But the third type presents problems. These are the Jews who maintain their borders furtively and deal disingenuously with gentiles. Raymond Chandler once observed of them that they want to be Jews among themselves but resent being seen as Jews by gentiles. They want to pursue their own distinct interests while pretending that they have no such interests, using the charge of "anti-Semitism" as sword and shield. As Chandler put it, they are like a man who refuses to give his real name and address but insists on being invited to all the best parties. Unfortunately, it's this third type that wields most of the power and skews the rules for gentiles. The columnist Richard Cohen cites an old maxim: "Dress British, think Yiddish."
Americans ought to be free to discuss Jewish power and Jewish interests frankly, without being accused of denying the rights of Jews. That should go without saying. The truth is both otherwise and unmentionable.
-----
Related - How Tyranny Came to America
You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/07/sobran-the-jewish-establishment.html
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at
Adolf Hitler's father, Alois Hitler, was born Aloys Schicklgruber on June 7, 1837. He was the illegitimate son of a 42 year old, unwed peasant woman from Lower Austria. Her name was Maria Anna Schicklgruber.
(LOUIS ROTHSCHILD, 1882-1955)
MOHAMMED (SOUTH AFRICA) said (July 20, 2019):
i agree with a lot of whats in the article but from what i see, one of the main causes of this issue is the fact that a lot of Americans still enlist in the military.
before WW2, the British military was the main enforcer of the Zionist banking cartel. After WW2, that role was given to the US military. Since then, every war/conflict that the US military has benn involved in, has NOT been for any justifiable or morally righteous reason- all has been for the benefit of the Zionist bankers & the big corporations that they control.
many whites think that without their govts interfering in the affairs of poorer nations, esp in Africa, these countries will become unstable & a breeding ground for extremists etc.
actually, the opposite is true.
have any of you watched John Perkins | New Confessions of an Economic Hit Man?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94IdpXp4hP0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btF6nKHo2i0
it seems that many whites conveniently believe that other races hate them just bcos they are whites. they dont want to get into the actual reasons bcos the truth hurts.
the Zionists have exploited that but you white westerners are still guilty to a great degree.
when it comes to immigrants, you seem to realise that the vast majority of them are in the west just to try & build a better life & future for their families. what many of you dont seem to understand is that most of these immigrants would prefer to remain in their home countries if they were safe, stable & prosperous but the constant interference of western nations makes that impossible.
of course, mainstream media wont tell you that- they will spin another story that makes you feel good about your govts & your militaries. do you think that if African countries has NO mineral resources at all, that western nations would have ANY troops stationed there?
the big corporation want the minerals under the soil of these poorer countries & they want your sons & daughters to enlist so that they can send them to enforce their will.
and these men & women who enlist- they just see the military as a career move- theyre there for the paycheck & benefits- maybe to be able to complete a college degree etc- they dont care that theyre being used to mess up other sovereign nations.
so when these countries become shitholes, as Trump mentioned, wouldnt you also try to leave and look for greener pastures if you could?
and wouldnt you also have some degree of animosity towards these white nations that you migrate to?
after all, its THEIR govts & militaries that were behind the mess your country has turned into.
the vast majority of immigrants dont know about the Zionist banking cartel- all they see is the white man.
am i wrong?
so the VERY FIRST step for ALL white westerners is to NOT enlist in the military & those who are already there, to get out ASAP- its more honorable to work a dead end job for minimum wage at Dunkin Donuts etc.
as far as AOC etc are concerned, theyre yet more puppets who are fulfilling a role(like Trump)- maybe they know exactly what theyre doing or maybe they dont- i have my doubts bcos sometimes they seem really dumb & sometimes i feel that a person just cant be that dumb so theyre just really good actors.
just look at Ilhan Omar- im a muslim & i cant believe she supports the LGBT community- even non muslims know that Islam and LGBT are about as far apart as you can get- so shes either really dumb or a good actor.