Rudy said (June 6, 2020):

The Deuteronomy piece was convoluted. Genesis 12,15,17 and 22 elucidate the promises by God to Abraham. Fast forward to Galatians 3 where Paul declares that Jesus is the fulfillment of the promises made to Abraham. If you read the first 7 chapters of Hebrews, you can see that it is like a high power defense attorney making a case for the singular uniqueness of Jesus as the promised messiah. Chapter 8 takes a direct quote of Jeremiah 31: 31-34 where God promises a new covenant with the house of Judah and the house of Israel.
The Only purpose for the ancient Hebrews being Gods chosen people was to deliver the the promised Messiah. Of course they rejected him and God destroyed them and Jerusalem along with the Temple in 70 ad.

As this website clearly provides evidences....the current Jewish community is either secular, or actively engaged in the promotion of the Assyrian (Revelation).
Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Joel, Daniel, Zecheriah, all hint or outright disclosed none other than Jesus Christ as Lord

CW said (June 6, 2020):

You were right to publish this. The Christians who commented are wrong, as they always are, because they will defend any depravity in the Old Testament as "out of context."

A religion is supposed to give moral and spiritual guidance. That is the context. To unleash terror on foreigners, for being inherently corrupt and sinful, according to the totally biased viewpoint of the writers, then and now, to justify their longing for world domination, is considered by people with a correctly functioning moral compass to be the perversion of religion.

It can't be whitewashed by the saviour narrative, which claims all the terror and suffering depicted in the Old Testament was a precursor to the real religion, because the aggressors, believing themselves to be God's people, had a religion, and according to Christians it was authorized by God himself.

Moreover, if they had obeyed the law as written, which is claimed to be perfect several times in the scriptures, then no saviour and no Christianity would have been necessary. Just world domination for the Chosen People™, as prescribed. Jesus Christ was hardly preaching lawlessness; and "Be ye therefore perfect as your Father in Heaven is perfect" is certainly not referring to following the "perfect" Torah.

Christians claim that when Christ says he comes to fulfill the law (Matthew 5:17) he's affirming its justice. Well, he obviously didn't come to uphold it, or we wouldn't have Christianity at all; thus "to fulfill" (which is open to interpretation and depends on us taking the scripture at its word) means Christ's own death and resurrection. He brings us the light only through which we can understand and then triumph over the darkness (Old Testament) through which this world is governed.

He knew revealing to the world that God's "kingdom is not of this world," doing away with all the messianic prophecy of the warrior king of Israel who leads them to destroy their enemies so they can rule the world from Jerusalem (Isaiah 60; i.e. the Zionist new world order), would bring about the redundancy of the Torah and Jehovah's power, at the same time as Jehovah's people having him killed for doing so.

Christ didn't destroy the law (Jehovah can have it); he fulfilled it, by reigning over it, by showing that the way to God is not by blind obedience in return for the hope of material this-worldly reward but spiritually, through transcendence of this world and triumph over its false god, our adversary, the same one Adam and Eve defied in the Garden of Eden (as the Secret Book of John details in the most sublime of ways).

CJ said (June 5, 2020):

've learned a wealth of information over the years from you. I applaud your research, and courage to deliver truth. But I'm black and didn't know you perceived blacks the way you do. You've said racist undertones thru the years, but with your latest post, you let it be known how you truly feel. Affirmative action for people who may not even be given an interview for a job, if they have a "black" name is about equality.
The same people you fight daily have created the black image you obviously hate. Blacks that are poor respond the same way poor people have always responded; with desperation. Our schools teach nothing that can be monetized, as you have proven thru the years. My people have been terrorized since colonizers invaded the America's. Most blacks are indegenous to America. Research Rafinesque if you disagree. History is a lie as you as you know.
Every person makes bad choices in life, but when they die we should have respect. There's no proof George was a crackhead and that has racist undertones. I have a Ph.D. just like you Henry, but I've been mistreated and had guns pointed in my face by police. Most people of your nature lack empathy needed to move the world forward. I hope this makes you better, because the world needs your talent and courage to make more than white males feel better. A message from one of your readers.

---
Thanks CJ for trying to educate me,

I am not in favor of police brutality against anyone but this whole Floyd thing is a Cabalist psyop

don't be such a dupe

Palestinian lives don't matter because Jews are to blame.

the issue today is anti white racism

the fact you have a PhD speaks volumes about anti black racism in the US today

btw

the fact he made porn has been confirmed

his autopsy confirmed he was overdosing on fentanyl

h

CJ said (June 5, 2020):

've learned a wealth of information over the years from you. I applaud your research, and courage to deliver truth. But I'm black and didn't know you perceived blacks the way you do. You've said racist undertones thru the years, but with your latest post, you let it be known how you truly feel. Affirmative action for people who may not even be given an interview for a job, if they have a "black" name is about equality.
The same people you fight daily have created the black image you obviously hate. Blacks that are poor respond the same way poor people have always responded; with desperation. Our schools teach nothing that can be monetized, as you have proven thru the years. My people have been terrorized since colonizers invaded the America's. Most blacks are indegenous to America. Research Rafinesque if you disagree. History is a lie as you as you know.
Every person makes bad choices in life, but when they die we should have respect. There's no proof George was a crackhead and that has racist undertones. I have a Ph.D. just like you Henry, but I've been mistreated and had guns pointed in my face by police. Most people of your nature lack empathy needed to move the world forward. I hope this makes you better, because the world needs your talent and courage to make more than white males feel better. A message from one of your readers.

---
Thanks CJ for trying to educate me,

I am not in favor of police brutality against anyone but this whole Floyd thing is a Cabalist psyop

don't be such a dupe

Palestinian lives don't matter because whites can't be blamed by Jews

the issue today is anti white racism

the fact you have a PhD speaks volumes about anti black racism in the US today

ps

btw

the fact he made porn has been confirmed

his autopsy confirmed he was overdosing on fentanyl

h

Leo said (June 5, 2020):

Comment to: "Deuteronomy, White Dispossession...

It was the Jew Moses Hess who wrote in his book 'Rome and Jerusalem' (1862): "All history hitherto has been that of racial and class war. Racial wars are the primary, class wars the secondary factor."

Basically, all these anti-white ethnic groups & individuals won't be happy until every gentile white male is dead. That's the 'end game'. The problem ethnocentric whites have is they don't have a Confederate government or Army anymore to fight for them, like they did in 1861.

So the future looks very dark with this continuous anti-white media bombardment. The solution of course is obvious, but most whites are instinctually corrupt and do not realize they need to secede from the 'Union' & form their own all-white nation-state. Otherwise the race is finished. Thus if each racial group had its own nation or territory then all this 'racial strife' wouldn't be transpiring within these societies, and civilization would advance.

But it appears most white men are more focused on watching these black sports teams & millions of white women are more interested in copulating with blacks than in any notion of existential racial survival.

Al Thompson said (June 5, 2020):

This article is extremely interesting to me. I noticed this too many years ago, and I stopped reading it because I really don’t know what I’m getting. Having been a Christian for so many years, I was always frustrated that they never stuck to the teachings in the Bible when it came to good morality. Usury (interest on loans) was always considered a sin as it is a form of theft. However, we see the following: “Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury.” This is a gross contradiction in moral values. I’ve also had the problem with the mass execution of any group of people. This is why I don’t rely on the writings unless I can confirm the truth by another means such as the natural law. It’s no wonder that we have been living in the new world order all along but didn’t realize it.

When you have so many moral contradictions it is difficult to believe that such a writing came from the real God.

https://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2010/02/scourge-of-usury.html

Fr Peter said (September 19, 2019):

Henry, the article may well be correct, seeing Deuteronomy as a Blue Print for Jewish World Domination

Of course the proper interpretation of this Book does not include Jewish domination over the world.

However, the 'Traditions of the Elders' or the oral form of the Talmud in Christ's time, was political and materialistic and Christ condemned such 'Traditions' as satanic. The Talmud was the codification by the Rabbis of this oral Law. And according to the Talmud, the Jews are to oppress all nations and be their masters. Judaism is Communism. "Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto so that non-Jews would know what is in the Talmud." (Elizabeth Dilling who wrote a book on Judaism which condemns the Talmud.)

Hence the comment of Marcos fails to take into account the perverse interpretation of Deuteronomy that the Pharisees, and later, the Rabbis, held and Christ condemned. So, yes indeed, this perverse interpretation of Deuteronomy may well be the Blueprint for total subjection of mankind by (Talmudic) Jews.

Peter W said (September 17, 2019):

This article is probably the worst one you have had published. I am a Reformed Protestant and therefore believe the Jew as the Hindu or the Moslem must come to Christ to be saved. I also believe the New
Testament and especially the Epistle to the Hebrews, whose Author remains unknown, and will not write off the Jews.

To conflate Deuteronomy with the Talmud is the most appalling scholarship and the author, knowingly or not, by writing off the Pentateuch (the first five Books of the Bible) which was written by Moses, has denied the Gospel. I do not believe the Author, Douglas
Reed, was a Christian, and I think you, Henry, should have known better than to have published it.

You and Reed appear to have completely forgotten the references in the
New Testament to Jesus castigating the Pharisees and the warning in Revelation regarding the Synagogue of Satan. For some reason, which I suspect is an appalling lack of the basic understanding of Scripture, those who recognize the existence of such a Synagogue, always try and drag in all of Jewry. The New testament cannot stand without the Old and Jesus came to fulfill the Law (Deuteronomy) not to do away with it. He said this, not me.

Essel said (June 4, 2020):

In Italy, as elsewhere, the State is a Masonic creation and the electoral system (parliamentary democracy) was designed so that it is impossible to get out of it if the rules are respected. All political parties and institutions such as "Justice"(!) or "Health"(!), are controlled by Freemasonry, which, let's not forget, is a secret society. Under these conditions, a political program that claims, without radically changing the regime by a (hypothetical) coup de force, to ban Freemasonry is at best an absurdity, at worst a new controlled opposition.

To want to suppress F-M is, in a way, to want to suppress evil. The intention is laudable (assuming one already starts by applying it to oneself), but it is strictly impossible, since every man, even the best, is more or less inclined to evil. In any society, it is impossible to avoid the appearance and the rampage of cunning perverts to the detriment of other members. The only possible right answer to the problem of evil is a personal one: do good and avoid evil as long as possible.

JG said (June 4, 2020):

Unfortunately Italy and Western Europe have been a victim of systemic anti national globalism for the last 10 years. Involuntary 3rd World Immigration has been imposed on their people and their culture and the results, as expected, have been a disaster.

I really hate to have the European people used as social guinea pigs like this.

It's been a problem for far too long.

A nation can't survive without God, family, and a national identity. A nation that abandons its inherited culture and racial heredity in exchange for an imposed globalized culture is doomed to fail.

I'm proud of Francesco and his efforts, it's time for Europeans to take back their nations.

Tony B said (June 4, 2020):

This is good to see. But must be made sustainable. In order to do that the order of their objectives need to be somewhat changed.

1 I know not what the 1929 State/Church Agreement was but that must be reversed with true Christianity FIRST and then made the first priority on their list. Otherwise there will never be real power for good in the movement.

2. This second level must be that which is now number 5., creating REAL AND HONEST MONEY as the state exchange medium.

If those two objectives could be miraculously accomplished, the rest would quickly and easily fall into place.

JJ said (September 5, 2018):

2 Timothy 3:6-8 says, "For among them are those who enter into households and captivate weak women weighed down with sins, led on by various impulses, always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so these men also oppose the truth, men of depraved mind, rejected in regard to the faith." This is a true definition of a liberal. They enter the home where they have no business. They target women who are more easily deceived. They always learn (liberals LOVE documentaries but only because they symbolize progress) but are dumb. They oppose the truth. They are depraved though they hide it well. Trying to get them to connect the dots like Dodd did is impossible. I'm to the point where I don't even try to argue with a liberal. I walk away.

Ken Adachi said (September 5, 2018):

This is your strongest and clearest exposition to date on this fundamental issue which is at the very heart of the JWO takeover agenda. No one could have said it more clearly or more succinctly.

If only enough Americans, Canadians, Europeans, and Australians could read these words and let the realization sink in. It could have an enormous and profound effect worldwide. I'm going to put it up right now. I can only hope that many others will follow suit. It couldn't be more on-target.

Tony B said (April 13, 2009):

Some thought and a bit of correction.

1. You are too young to know - since the media was universal in lying about this, making it semi official by default - but the U.S. house committee to which you refer was NOT titled "HUAC" or House Unamerican Activities Committee. I had to make this same correction for many of those at Liberty Lobby some years ago.

The proper and official name of the committee was The House Committee on Unamerican Activities, the HCUA. You can readily see why the lying media constantly slurred it with the improper name you were subjected to. Just another misuse of the language - the real battle for the mind - as a tactic for their advantage.

2. Also in the word game, I would love to see right thinking people all stop using the word "capitalism" in a positive sense. When they do this they are really thinking of free enterprise, which is 180 degrees opposite of monopoly capitalism. You now have to find dictionaries about 100 years old to find the true definition of capitalism, which is, as its name clearly indicates, "the concentration of capital into the hands of a few." Ergo, "Monopoly capitalism" is a redundancy. ALL capitalism amounts to monopoly. That evil is what we have presently as the immediate cause of the economic dilemma in the world in the form of privately created medium of exchange as private debt owed to the few bankers of issue.

Free enterprise, to the contrary, indicates a huge middle class created by locally owned and operated businesses taking care of local needs, wherein most are financially comfortable, few dirt poor, and even fewer filthy rich - with few, if any, gigantic private piles of wealth.

Free enterprise cannot exist with our present capitalistic privately owned medium of exchange. Those who are favored by the bankers of issue will get loans, thus the existence of huge globalist combines, franchises, mall chains, etc. which easily freeze out and destroy local businesses, which find they can never get truly competitive finance.

Capitalism in NOT the opposite of socialism, free enterprise is. None of the other "isms" can exist beyond coffee house rabble rousing without capital financing them. Therefore, socialism - in all its variants - is just another handmaiden of capitalism, as was the Soviet Union and as is Red China, the United States and practically all other "western nations.

In fact, the Muslim nations may be the only nations left on earth which are NOT controlled through capitalism and we already know that at least some of the more radical Muslim sects ARE western world, i.e. capitalist, creations.

3. Still in the word game, the word "liberal" as used today often is used as a euphemism for the word "license," in the worse sense of that word's meanings. For too many of today's miseducated masses, "freedom" means doing exactly what the individual feels like doing with no concern for the effect of an act on those in the immediate sphere of any result, or on the world in general. The whole world of queers and lesbians can be defined by this statement. There is nothing whatsoever natural or necessary about their filthy learned (not inborn) perversions which are excused as a mental disease being coughed into the world. It also fits the feminist blight. A pox on all of them.

In this war let's use plain words with power in them. They make a good contrast to the enemy's weasel "sneak" misuses of words which are usually labeled "politically correct." You cannot modify the word "correct" without making the word the opposite of correct. The term "politically correct" has no choice but to mean that whatever is referred to is incorrect for purposes of a political agenda. Plain and simple.

Your site is, overall, an excellent example of the proper use of powerful words.

Sean said (April 12, 2009):

Dear Dr. Makow,

I wanted to look up the spelling of acquaintance online, and the dictionary gave me two choices: "acquaintance and acquaintance rape".

I mean, how could you even think of the term acquaintance without thinking of "rape?"

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acquaintance