Direct Link to Latest News

 

Beautiful Women: Sex and Social Control

May 4, 2003

Tommy Hilfiger's IntimatesAt the mall my wife and I passed a 30-foot-high banner suspended from the ceiling. It didn't say "Obey." Rather it displayed a 19-year-old girl wearing nothing but a bikini.

'That makes women feel inadequate and insecure," my wife remarked.

At the same time, men are supposed to pant and salivate. Both sexes are programmed to seek a shallow and impossible ideal.

I could honestly tell my wife she needn't feel insecure on my account. These girls are great to look at but are not worth the trouble. I used to be married to one and recorded the experience in my book, "A Long Way to go for a Date."

My experience taught me to separate a woman's appearance from her character. Like many immature men, I used to idolize beautiful women. They ceased to be human beings.

Marilyn Monroe once said, "I always let men fool themselves. They were obviously loving someone I wasn't."

Women actually find pedestals uncomfortable. Soon they pity and resent the men who put them there.

Men should never forfeit power by worshiping a woman. The essence of masculinity is power. Women crave male power, expressed as male love. When a woman loves, she surrenders "power" in exchange for love.

Men and women are equal in terms of human dignity and self-fulfillment. But they do not find fulfillment in the same way. Women find it in self-surrender. By insisting on equal power, feminists neuter women and emasculate men. Their marriages remind me of roommates.

BOYS ARE NEEDY. MEN MAKE DEMANDS

Gentlemen. The measure of a woman is not what she looks like but what she will do for you.

What good is a gorgeous woman if she makes your life hell? After the sex urge has abated, what else can she do? My ex couldn't master anything that wasn't also a natural function.

Men have been brainwashed to think they're evil ogres who must cater to women in exchange for love. That's what women do! Feminism has turned men into women. (I'm exaggerating when I use the term "cater.")

A feminine woman adjusts to the man she loves. She is yin to his yang. Men might seek these women in the ranks of pleasant or even plain-looking women. They have skills and personality. They are rational and decent. They don't think they are special and aren't so obsessed with their appearance.

Love makes a woman beautiful. Making love, you're looking at her face, not her body. If she loves you, her face is spectacular.

THE (HOMO) SEXUAL REVOLUTION

The 1950's-60's sexual revolution was designed to destroy family and morality by turning heterosexuals into homosexuals.

As I have described elsewhere, the Rockefellers have long promoted eugenics and population control. They funded the fraudulent Kinsey Report that encouraged homosexual behavior. This led to the media- hyped Hugh Hefner and Helen Gurley Brown who retailed promiscuity and ridiculed marriage.

Heterosexuality is not a sexual preference. It is the natural life cycle, characterized by marriage and family. This is the way we grow.

Homosexuality is arrested development caused by inability to form a permanent bond with a member of the opposite sex. This is usually due to overbearing mother, distant father, or sexual abuse as a youth.

Generally homosexual relationships are distinguished by a desperate quest for love through sexual gratification. They tend to be short term and numerous. Gay writer Andrew Webb says the dominant homosexual ideology regards "unfettered sex as the defining feature of gay identity." Gay relationships he says "are a joke and rarely monogamous." http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0111.webb.html

Increasingly this ailment has inflicted heterosexuals too. The (homo) sexual revolution has crippled our ability to bond. Feminism (which is lesbian at heart) has emasculated men and taught women to hate men and usurp their identity.

Heterosexuals have difficulty forming a permanent bond. A friend observes a "sadness" among the single young women he knows. There are so few men fit to take on the responsibility of family.

SEX AND MORALS

I was born in 1949 and can remember when sex was consecrated for marriage. It was harnessed to raise healthy families and build society. People found their identity and fulfillment in family.

Morals are spiritual laws that uplift and protect us. Sex is the most intimate physical experience two people can have. It must take place in the context of love because human beings are also rational, emotional and spiritual. Anything else is degrading.

(I am not opposed to pre marital sex but would restrict it to long-term relationships, the fewer the better. I admire women who consecrate themselves for their future husband and family.)

The elite media portrayed the (homo) sexual revolution as "liberation." People could copulate without the "restraints" of morality. As a result, all human relationships have been debased. Strangers are suspicious of every glance, word or smile. Men can't show affection for other men. Adults can't admire children. Society suffers from arrested development, i.e. a juvenile obsession with appearance, sex, pornography and genitals.


ELITE CONSPIRACY

This assault on heterosexuals, motherhood and the family in my lifetime confirms the existence of an elite conspiracy. The annihilation of "bourgeois" marriage and family is a basic tenet of Communism.

Wealthy capitalists bankrolled Communism. It was never about class, equality and public ownership (window dressing for "innocents.") Communism is an elite program to destroy Western Civilization. Its aim is totalitarian government based on private instead of public monopoly, i.e. very big government in the service of very big business.

(We scoff reflexively at any mention of a "Communist conspiracy." Why do you think that is? The "elite" media shapes our attitudes.)

Elite "Communists" took control of the United States under FDR and have been in charge ever since. They're called liberals, neo conservatives and feminists now.

Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton's professor at Georgetown University, had access to their records and wrote in his book "Tragedy and Hope" (1966):

"It was this group of people...who provided much of the framework of influence which [enabled] the Communist sympathizers and fellow travelers [to] take over in the United States in the 1930's. It must be recognized that the power these energetic Left-wingers exercised was never their own power or Communist power but was ultimately the power of the international financial coterie." (Quoted in Steve Bonta, Inside the UN, p.21)

As long as half-naked girls fill our billboards and our minds, we can be controlled. Sex starved, stunted, and isolated, we can't resist satanic forces.

By rejecting shallow sexual snares and building lives based on our natural heterosexual roles, we spit in the devil's eye.



Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at