Direct Link to Latest News


Homofascists Silenced Gay Dissident John McKellar

July 3, 2013

a99_mckellar.jpg(left. McKellar in 1998. Lefties who support "gay rights" never ask why all big banks and corporations are promoting it.)

For six-years, 1997-2003, John McKellar, a Canadian homosexual, represented a voice of sanity. 
As the founder of Homosexuals Opposed to Pride Extremism, he was a tireless critic of the Illuminati bankers' heterophophic agenda.

Now he and his organization are gone. I don't know what happened but when I read this, I understand why:

from 1999

He said that in the gay lifestyle,"Compulsive, anonymous sex in bathrooms and parks is much more common than the media want to admit."

McKellar described the gay bathhouse as "dirty, with a stench of amyl nitrate and human feces. Amyl nitrate was snorted to get a longer lasting erection, and anal sex was going on all the time, with or without condoms. Some men would hang out in the bathhouse all night and have sex with up to six different partners. It was animalistic."

McKellar stated that the gay community sees it as necessary to "get the children when they are young to make gay positive recruits, even if they don't necessarily become gay themselves. This is why they want homosexuality and all its perversions taught to the children at the earliest possible age."

McKellar believed that the majority of homosexuals are not supportive of the pedophile agenda.

McKellar says he feels the most sorry for transsexuals. "They, more than anyone else, are the most neurotic, into drugs, alcohol, and prostitution, as they are totally messed up about their sexuality."

As for tax-funded sex change operations, he says, "I don't believe in a lot of gay medicine; it's more mutilation than medicine. The gay community is more well-funded than any else; it should pay for its own elective procedures."

McKellar believes it is possible to heal the homosexual condition. He admits that he still struggles and has some failures, but decided to leave the "official" gay scene as "it was too risky and the relationships were always a dead end. "

He says reparative therapy is helpful and necessary in helping some gay men and lesbians out of the lifestyle. More attention should be given to the benefits and success stories associated with reparative therapy, he believes, while maintaining that self-control and discipline are necessary virtues in anyone's battle to take control of their sexuality.

McKellar formed Homosexuals Opposed to Pride Extremism in 1997 in response to what he calls "the pink triangle brigade." This is a reference to militant homosexuals who would like to impose all of the above-mentioned behaviours on the rest of the country.

When asked if his organization condemns all homosexual activity as morally wrong, McKellar says, "No, I do not get into those personal issues. I get into the political issues. People can decide for themselves on the moral issues."

 When asked where he stands personally on the morality of homosexual acts, he says that he would prefer to keep people, especially in the homosexual community guessing, "so that they will never know where I am coming from."

In 1999, HOPE was locked into a battle with the Ontario Human Rights Commission after it was a co-signatory to an April 18, 1998 full-page ad by Ken Campbell in the Globe and Mail, decrying the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in the Alberta Vriend decision.  Source

"If you don't swing with the Sodomites, you're nowheresville on the A-list."
Camille Paglia

by John McKellar
(from Aug 2003, Abridged by


The 'choice and diversity' crowd would do well to read the gay press, which has long been replete with articles, editorials and letters lambasting the whole idea of same-sex nuptials.

Clearly, a substantial majority of us neither need nor want gay marriage. Lesbian authors, Jane Rule and Camille Paglia, drag queen, Sky Gilbert and the late pioneer activist, Harry Hay are among the numerous prominent opponents of this forced parity.

We neither need nor want the state in our bedrooms. We neither need nor want to be shackled by rules, regulations or paperwork. We've already won the same-sex benefits battle, so there's no longer concern over matters of pensions or estates. Let the straights keep marriage. We need to be liberated from the mainstream, homogeneous, egalitarian mindset that is destroying what is left of gay culture.

gaymarriage02to1.jpgEven the January 14, 2001 gay wedding spectacle at Toronto's Metropolitan Community Church, left, although treated as the social event of the season by a delirious media circus, was shunned and scoffed at by the gay community. Better to stay at home and clean out the fridge when your public image is so embarrassingly represented by such maudlin specimens of martyrdom, who fancy themselves as pioneers and revolutionaries, but who simply reinforce every prejudice against us.

As an openly gay male, I have no problem conceding that heterosexuality is and will always be the great human norm. But I have no time for the modern, feel-good, pop-culture mentality that facilely equates homosexuality with heterosexuality and asks no deep questions about human psychology beyond the the superficial liberal-vs-conservative, freedom-vs-oppression dichotomy. And I have even less time for the insatiable demands and infantile caterwauling of my radical brothers and sisters who want to make the whole world their closet.

So, I formed HOPE (Homosexuals Opposed to Pride Extremism) in 1997 to a) expose the lies, myths, distortions and propaganda of modern gay activism, b) deconstruct the oppression and victimology politics, c) give a credible voice to happy, successful and independent gays and lesbians who don't wake up every day finding "hate, bigotry and discrimination" under the bed and who don't go running to the courts, the governments or the human rights commissions for a lifetime of therapeutic preferences.


Most Canadians believe that gays and lesbians should be able to pursue any brand of consensual sex as we see fit and form whatever relationships that make us happy. But I'm sick and tired of the activist mantra that my dignity and my relationships are devalued because the state will not codify same-sex marriage. And I'm not so insecure and so selfish to demand that marriage be redefined for everyone else.

Marriage is not an arbitrary convention and is not meant to change with the times. We're not talking about music, fashion or art. We're talking about an institution whose four prohibitions - you can only marry one person at a time, only someone of the opposite sex, never someone beneath a certain age, and not a close blood relative - have been grounded in morality and in law for millennia (the highlighting etc is mine - RJ). Humankind yearns for these stabilizing factors in our kaleidoscopic world and if we abandon these standards, then everything becomes legal and everything becomes moral. If gay marriages are permitted (a prerogative of the most decadent Roman emperors), why not polygamy? Why not brother and sister or parent and child?

Gay activists and their ever-willing accomplices in the media, relentlessly drive through our skulls that homosexuality is "not a choice", because no one would choose to be gay in a homophobic society. Firstly, there is an element of choice in all behavior, sexual or otherwise. Secondly, despite public fanfare and trendy hypotheses, there is no conclusive scientific evidence as to the biological, genetic, psychological and sociological influences on sexual orientation. The modern change in opinion concerning homosexuality, though presented as a scientific advance, is contradicted rather than supported by science. It is a transformation of public morals consistent with widespread abandonment of the Judeo-Christian ethics upon which our civilization is based. Though hailed as "progress", it is really a reversion to ancient pagan practices supported by a counter-culture restatement of gnostic moral relativism.

It is well documented that long term relationships and fidelity are extremely rare in the gay world. From Hollywood Boy Parties to Fire Island, from Gay Pride to Gay Games, homosexual men are relentlessly searching for "Mecca" - even if it's just for a weekend. Even at the Annual Global Conference on AIDS, the nightlife is more noteworthy than the daytime activities. Every night the discos are packed with gay doctors, nurses, activists and researchers shamelessly cruising one another. Likewise, the bathhouses do land-office business. In spite of the solemnity and tragedy in dealing dealing with a wasteful and fatal disease, the hedonistic, promiscuous, sex-carnival atmosphere never lets up.

 Recently, Xtra, Canada's gay and lesbian bi-weekly, ran a feature entitled "How to Stay Married and Still Be a Slut", which, at first glance, seems satirical, but which is actually a serious guideline on how to have one's cake and eat it too.

Gay activism has always been naive in its belligerent confidence that "homophobia" will disappear with massive and forced education of the benighted. But such relentless indoctrination cannot be achieved without fascist obliteration of all freedoms. And since freedom always trumps diversity and tolerance, you can rest assured that any perceived threat to freedom will result in a societal backlash which will guarantee oppression of all homosexuals. Gay males, especially, are forever on the edge of a precipice, because in a political cataclysm we are always the first to be purged.

No gay or lesbian, surrounded overwhelmingly by heterosexuals, will feel at home in his or her sexual and emotional world, even in the most tolerant of cultures.  At a young age we learn the rituals of deceit, impersonation and appearance, and anyone who believes political, social or even cultural revolution will change this fundamentally is denying reality. The unhappy truth is that male homosexuality will never be fully accepted by the heterosexual majority, who are obeying the dictates not of "bigoted" society or religion, but of procreative nature.

Yet this desperation deepens our artistic insight and allows us to create civilization. Undoubtedly, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Tchaikovsky, Somerset Maugham, Gore Vidal, et al experienced hardship and alienation. But look what they gave to the world. Look how they advanced the cultural heritage. They were too cultivated, creative and cosmopolitan to be concerned with the trivialities of sexual pride, queer studies or diversity. One of them glorified God and Church by painting the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, despite the Vatican's unequivocal denunciation of homosexuality.


By far, the scariest and most insidious corollary to same-sex marriage is same-sex adoption (already legal in some jurisdictions). This is blatant child abuse. Children need a biological mother and father. We know this is not always possible, even in the context of opposite-sex marriage, but we don't solve the problem or alleviate the inconsistency by augmenting it. Children are not meant to be guinea pigs for social engineering experiments. Self-interested partisans will manufacture statistics to support their specious claims that children of gay marriages fare as well as those of traditional families. But the phenomenon of same-sex parenting doesn't have the longevity needed for such conclusive evidence, whereas the experience of single-parent families has not always, but often shown detriment to the development of the offspring.

When society allows men to marry men and women to marry women, it perpetuates the alienation of the sexes and contributes to the ever-increasing crisis in the sex roles. Before Stonewall, gays and lesbians mixed socially and in the clubs with a pretty good understanding of and appreciation for one another. But as gay liberation took hold, gay males, feeling ebullient from their new-found freedom, descended into a bacchanalia of narcissism and promiscuity. Segregated bars, orgy rooms and bathhouses exploded in number and luxury. Strange parasitic diseases soon began appearing, and by 1981, a "gay cancer" was identified as AIDS. We must honestly admit that even gay men's attempt to create a world without women failed catastrophically.

Unfortunately, most people's sense of history begins the day they were born...  Whenever humankind fails to protect time-honored political, moral and social institutions, whenever humankind attempts to embrace pride as a virtue and mainstream behavior that contravenes natural law, and whenever humankind becomes arrogant, autonomous, egalitarian, nihilistic and foolish, civilization fails - always and without exception. So, here we are repeating the cycle and getting ready to crash and burn one more time.
Related- Satire on Gay Adoption is Exhilarating
---------  Charles Socarides MD - Excuse Me-Gay is not Good

Thanks to Sandy for bringing John McKellar to my attention.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Homofascists Silenced Gay Dissident John McKellar "

Marcos (Brazil) said (July 4, 2013):

There is a project for a law in Brazil (PLC122) that will criminalize any opinion contrary to the gay lifestyle, even if it is philosophically or religiously based.
Even without the law, there is a self-censorship in the media, since most journalists are pro-gay.

The question is: for how long will the elite allow us to have the internet? This week the web sensation in Brazil has been a video by a courageous doctor who exposes the dangers of anal sex. 100% of her gay patients had endocarditis, an infection of the heart valves caused by bacteria from feces. It leads to valve failure and even with a valve transplant, often leads to strokes.

The numbers for prostate and rectal cancer are also triple the ones for the hetero population. 68% of chance of getting cancer is not something to tinker with.

JG said (July 3, 2013):

Dan,[below] so very true and so well explained.
I grew up in the late 60's when "acid liberalism" was uncorked and dropped on Christian America. I saw how it immediately changed a lot of people, especially the youth.

You are right Dan, the depletion of their Christian foundation began long before and this made them ripe for Satan's picking.

Pornography, abortion, same sex marriage and all the other "doctrines of demons" are the fruits of an apostate society that has abandoned God.

This is not the first time in history that this has happened and the wrath of God will follow again and soon.

Dan said (July 3, 2013):

I look at family photos from the 19th century and it's plain that even the 'nuclear family' was part of a hundred year process of dismantling family. Families large - minimum six children and nine wasn't uncommon. But what we do not know is the family wasn't 'nuclear'. Family extended to aunts and uncles, and cousins and all the grandparents. Families flourished in home towns for generations, even centuries.

With a century of gradual steps:

1. Sending men overseas to fight two world wars, a year of two at the most impressionable age living in an unnatural all-male military 'brotherhood' - whose tradition was to introduce young men to their first sexual experience with whores in bars. Exposure to the homosexual subculture that's always been a parasite on the military.\

2. Luring the youth off the farms to big cities, through movies and 'education', and the WPA and New Deal projects whose real purpose was to separate youth from clans, to disintegrate the 'kin' system.

3. Movie and media emphasis on emotional 'romance' and sex attraction.

4. Disintegration of Christian formation of youth. That depended upon kin an clan reinforcement far more than churches or the Boy Scouts and YMCA.

And these things were only the prelude to the the Kinsey Report, Playboy, pornography, and 'sex-drugs-rock'n'roll', feminism, the 'pill' and the sex 'revolution'.

People think it happened after 1950, but the damage was already done during the first 50 years of the century, by uprooting people from home town.

I grew up in a Presbyterian church near a naval air station. A family was a married couple with 1 to 3 kids, no relatives within 500 miles.

Nobody was 'from here'. The power of the churches was as the binding factor for villages of extended families with roots. Without that, pastors preached platitudes and focused on fundraiser parties to keep the money coming in from a transient congregation that didn't love each other. Formation of awareness of the Sacred needs living examples - it can't simply be taught in a class or a sermon.

Few Americans got any serious formation for marriage at all. It became an option, a hedge, a toy. The Boomers had no formation at all. I remember in 1970 everybody thought marriage was about sex and if you weren't wanting children right now there was no need for it. Girls quit bothering to 'save it for marriage'.
Boys just wanted to 'get some'.

That's why the majority of people are being conned into thinking marriage is about whether two human beings like to fuck each other and live the same 'lifestyle'. Marital promiscuity is 'okay' as long as it's mutually 'consensual'. So two bull fruits that shack up together and mutually like to cruise together to bring home strangers qualifies as a valid 'marriage'.

I can no longer have a conversation with people that think that way. I learned too late in life what it means that marriage is a sacrament, and people have no idea what that means.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at