Direct Link to Latest News

 

Fashion Joins War Against Men

January 25, 2014

fag-fashions.jpg

(Men's Fashions. See many more examples here.)



The goal of these feminazi engineers isn't to turn men gay - it's to do away with 'gender consciousness' entirely.   These lunatics want a 'gender free society'.  Heterosexuals are oblivious to this underhanded, vicious and hateful attack on their identity and meaning.












"Revolution's Race to the Bottom - 'Gender Neutrality'"
by Richard Evans 
(henrymakow.com) 

"The Future of Menswear Is Feminine", says the tampon tabloid 'JEZEBEL' this week.  

I laughed at these photos from London Fashion Week.   THEY ARE NONSENSE.  The designers are all women.  Not surprisingly the emasculation of men goes part and parcel with feminism.  

Feminist ideology has twisted our society into a pretzel of me-ism and influenced lifestyle for the worst. We must remember the women's movement of the 60-70s perpetrated a lie that there is no difference between males and females.

19bu9hhyseijyjpg.jpgOf course, no men were consulted as to whether we want this new fashion direction. Any man can tell you that they are repugnant.   Even the sissies modelling these things look embarrassed.

The fact is, sissies or "femmes", unlike women, want to create their own ensembles.  That's why far more women's fashion designers are sissies and bull fruits, not women. 

By the way, bull fruits and 'bears' like to look SUPER-macho, like gladiators.  (remember the Village People from the Disco era?). Things like motorcycle gang chic.  NO self respecting butch would be caught dead wearing these feminist Ken Doll dress-up like Barbie infantile fantasy.  This may come as a shock to feminist social engineers, but an estimated 45% of male homosexuals are butch and want to look like G.I. JOE - not an anorexic KEN doll in Barbie drag.

Then I started thinking, will the government get involved and make it mandatory for boys in public schools?   After all, the social engineering isn't targeting males who are already queer.  That's only 2% of the population in most places.  The target is the other 98%.  The goal of these feminazi engineers isn't to turn men gay - it's to do away with 'gender consciousness' entirely.   These lunatics want a 'gender free society'.

SWEDEN

Since the 1950's, the "leader" country in this race to the bottom of degradation of humanity has been Sweden.  I don't think the Swedes are especially perverse naturally.  There's just something in their nature that made them highly vulnerable to social engineering.  

bulliy-bait.jpg(Left, this is a boy.)

Yes, the Swedish government has been sponsoring 'beta schools' where girls and boys both wear 'gender neutral' clothes.  The only way to describe it is "munchkin land" from the 1939 Judy Garland movie "Wizard of Oz".  The boys clothing is definitely feminized beyond recognition.  

Sweden also has a new gender-neutral pronoun: "Hen" . See:  A country tries to banish gender.  

While we're waiting for Gender Neutral dress codes to hit our grade schools, I expect we'll soon see "The Stars" dressed like this on the covers of tabloids we see every day in checkout lines.  We'll see celebrities being praised for it ad nauseum on TV shows and news.   And people will go right on watching TV and laughing about it with their children.  In a year of so they'll wonder why their sons start dressing like that.

We as a nation could put the brakes on this shit with a single act.  It can be done at home, with a few clicks on the computer or phone call.   It doesn't require town hall meetings, union dues, joining a party, voting, or marching around City Hall with bullhorns.

I
myliebieber.jpg
(Social engineers, aka "entertainers" Mylie Bieber) 

If at least 80 million Americans cancelled their TV subscriptions abruptly - to-day, that would greatly concern the NWO engineers.  They'd have to take several steps back.

The only way that's going to happen is a spontaneous wave of revulsion sweeping through the population.  It's happened before a few times in history.

My grandparents said when the public gets fed-up with something, look out.   It's like flipping a switch.   

I read somewhere that around 411 AD, a generation came along in Rome that simply quit going to the Colosseum out of disgust for blood sport.

But it's a very long way to the 'bottom'.  Since they're taking the children down this road to gender confusion and narcissism I now think it may be at least a generation, but more likely several generations for humanity to 'hit bottom' and throw off this 'New World Order'.

Conchita-Wurst4-550x826.jpg(L. Conchita Wurst, bearded transvestite chosen as Austrian rep to Eurovision Song Contest)

The old world may be dying with a whimper, but I assure you the New One will go out with a bang, when it's time comes.


---------
First Comment from Henrik Palmgren (Red Ice Radio):

"I don't think the Swedes are especially perverse naturally.  There's just something in their nature that made them highly vulnerable to social engineering."

 

He should make himself familiar with "The Nordic Model" and the cultural nuances of what really is going on in Sweden and Scandinavia. This is something that we have been taking about on Red Ice Radio for years now. More: http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/sweden.php

 

It's not something in "our nature". It's the state control of education, socialism and the social engineering that is planned against men in Sweden from the cradle to deat: http://www.whyileftsweden.com/?cat=49 The reason why they have been targeting Scandinavians specifically (first), since the 1940's with the creation of Folkhemmet: http://www.whyileftsweden.com/?p=175 is something that people can figure out pretty easy if they just do some basic history research and where the resistance to the roman empire really came from. The Goths, the visigoths, the ostrogoths, vandals, the Lombards, the Greuthungi, the Thervings, basically all the proud "Germanic barbarians" (that they today call "evil pagans") that the Zionists and Romans alike hated equally, have their history rooted in resistance to their "civilization" of submission and wheat. The globalists figured out that they need to strike at the root of where the resistance came from. This is the reason why Swedes and Scandinavians have been targeted more (so far) than any other country in the world. Don't worry though, it will come to your country soon enough as the Nordic Model (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model) is exported and promoted in the media and schools.

 



kanye-west-skirt-12-12-12-concert-glamazons-blog-3.jpg (Left, Kanya West wears skirt to perform at recent Sandy Hill benefit concert.)


Don adds:


Richard Evans writes:  "I don't think the Swedes are especially perverse naturally.  There's just something in their nature that made them highly vulnerable to social engineering."

It's their passive-aggressiveness, a trait that is a key component of most northern European cultures - cultures in which, not coincidentally, feminism has made its most destructive strides. Passive-aggressiveness is a defining feature of the female, as opposed to the male's direct aggression. When feminism came along, men of Scandinavian and other northern European backgrounds fell over like dominoes because they had been reared according to a "go along, get along" mentality - one that served them well when it came time to help each other through the long, brutal winters, but also a mindset that was wholly inadequate to repel the feminist foe.

Just to cite one of many examples, consider how Elin Nordegren reacted to Tiger Woods' infidelity. In Scandinavia, the spirit of the Viking conqueror of old burns far more brightly in the women than it does in the men. Feminism won't be turned back in that part of the world until each man feels free to channel his inner Erik the Red.






Comments for "Fashion Joins War Against Men"

Doug P said (January 26, 2014):

I think a lot of people know this, but David Rockefeller was forced to wear a dress as a young child. This was on a History channel documentary about the Rockefellers.


Doug said (January 26, 2014):

I think a lot of people know this, but David Rockefeller was forced to wear a dress as a young child. This was on a History channel documentary about the Rockefellers.


Maxel said (January 26, 2014):

I don't believe that all of the people must adopt certain beliefs. Every human being is unique, and this "method" of "sexual nutrition" may cause serious damage in most people. It's like penicillin: GOOD for some people and BAD for some people.

Moreover, the mysterious Hindu culture may not be suitable for our occidental way of thinking. Once I read the works of Erich Fromm, and he stated in "The art of loving" that while Occidental culture brought us science and dogma, Oriental culture is all about tolerance and self-transformation. Therefore, we are in a permanent state of doubt and insecurity. We must believe in something UNIVERSAL, and this belief go beyond Hinduism, Islamism and other human "isms". Find this universal system of knowledge and belief is the urgent task of our time.


Adrian said (January 26, 2014):

Another aspect of fashion is the morphing of "ugly as beautiful" in fashion mass media (posters, Hollywood). Projecting ugly as beautiful incites all those persons deformed by fat and unhealthy lifestyles to do nothing.

Men are programmed by nature (in general) to look for reproductive potential, to see female physical beauty in terms of rounded contours, high cheek bones, an S profile of breasts and hips, athletic shoulders (not horizontal).

What fashion has been pushing for at least 5 years is women they seem to have dredged up from hell: dark hollowed out eyes (mainly through make up), beak and hooked noses, straight hips, straight shoulders, no breasts, anorexic.

Yes, some such women may have beautiful minds, but not likely.

Even if they are capable of reproduction, putting fashion men and fashion women together will not create a healthy human race.


GC said (January 26, 2014):

Mr. Makow, regarding your article "Fashion Joins War Against Men", I'd like to add something that I've noticed here in Brazil: lots of men
are using skinny jeans (also known as slim-fit pants). I find it strange, seeing men using this kind of outfit. In my opinion, it doesn't look like a virile item of clothing.

Have an excellent 2014. God bless you.


Roman said (January 26, 2014):

When I was 7 or 8 years old I asked my old Lithuanian Catholic grandma when the end of the world would come. She said when men start wearing skirts. There used to be a time (maybe still is in some countries ) when even grannies like her would send those fags to the hospital faster than they can lift their skirts.


anon said (January 26, 2014):

"I read somewhere that around 411 AD, a generation came along in Rome that simply quit going to the Colosseum out of disgust for blood sport." Read Foxe's Book of Martyrs


Don said (January 25, 2014):

Richard Evans, writes:

"I don't think the Swedes are especially perverse naturally. There's just something in their nature that made them highly vulnerable to social engineering."

It's their passive-aggressiveness, a trait that is a key component of most northern European cultures - cultures in which, not coincidentally, feminism has made its most destructive strides. Passive-aggressiveness is a defining feature of the female, as opposed to the male's direct aggression. When feminism came along, men of Scandinavian and other northern European backgrounds fell over like dominoes because they had been reared according to a "go along, get along" mentality - one that served them well when it came time to help each other through the long, brutal winters, but also a mindset that was wholly inadequate to repel the feminist foe.

Just to cite one of many examples, consider how Elin Nordegren reacted to Tiger Woods' infidelity. In Scandinavia, the spirit of the Viking conqueror of old burns far more brightly in the women than it does in the men. Feminism won't be turned back in that part of the world until each man feels free to channel his inner Erik the Red.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at