Direct Link to Latest News

 

René Guénon: Good Guy or Bad Guy?

February 6, 2014


Guenon-author-pg-image-2.jpg(left, Rene Guenon, 1886-1951) 

 Rene Guenon provided us with one of the deepest 
 metaphysical analyses of the End Times ever produced.




(See David Livingstone's and Marcos' rebuttal below. as well as my comment.) 

by Charles Upton
(henrymakow.com) 

Henry suggested this title--and I wish it were that simple.

René Guénon [1886-1951] started a movement to return the western world to traditional metaphysics, and succeeded in a modest but very real way. 

He and the writers that followed him--the Traditionalist or Perenialist School, including Ananda Coomaraswamy, Frithjof Schuon, Martin Lings, Titus Burckhardt and Seyyed Hossein Nasr (the last four were/are Muslims)--have produced the best introduction to the metaphysics and esoterism of the world religions that we have. 

But Guénon was the only member of the School who also dipped into investigative reporting to expose the dark side of esoterism. This led him to the notion that there was a "Counter-Tradition" and a "Counter-Initiation" that was working through various secret societies, to pervert true religion, and ultimately turn the world over to Luciferian forces. 

Between the world wars he involved himself with nearly every occult group available in France at that time, so he saw the evils of that world first-hand. Then, when he finally broke with occultism and began to study the esoteric aspects of the world religions (which he saw as entirely legitimate) he published two books exposing the evils of the occult: The Spiritualist Imposture and Theosophy, the History of a Pseudo-Religion.

Guénon showed us how esoterism has both a light and a dark side, and exposed the relationship between a perverted, Luciferian metaphysics and the organized evil that rules today's world. (In my books The System of Antichrist and Vectors of the Counter-Initiation, I've tried to expand on some of his findings.) 

REJECTS GURU ROLE

René Guénon did not emerge unscathed, however, from his years as an occultist. Raised a Catholic, he finally converted to Islam, was initiated into a traditional Sufi order, and spend the rest of his life in Egypt.

HIs answer to requests to act as a spiritual Master was that his soul had been so damaged by his earlier occult connections that he was not fit to play that role. And it took him quite a while to get rid of all the occult influences on his thinking. 

His main error was the idea that Freemasonry, once "purified" and reconstructed, could work as a legitimate form of "esoteric" Catholicism. He could never see that Masonry perfectly fit his own description of a Counter-Initiatory society. 

Also, many of his present-day followers in Europe (certainly not all) are more-or-less crypto-Nazis--though I can't imagine that Guénon would accept such followers today, since while he lived was mostly a-political. 

As for the Perennialist School, it has its own dark side (in common with most spiritual groups and most groups), and seems to be uncertain whether or not to accept patronage from the Globalists. But its best spiritual writings are still second to none.

CONCLUSION

Those who've realized that they can only save their souls through spiritual knowledge can learn a lot from Guénon. People who believe there is an occult, Luciferian side to the NWO can get valuable pointers from him.

But you need to read him critically. Before you can pick out his contradictions you have to understand him, and that's easier said than done; he's a difficult writer. 

Nonetheless, if you accept that metaphysics, and the traditional prophesies about the End Times are becoming more relevant to understanding the agendas of the powers that be, "the rulers of the darkness of this world", then René Guénon--especially in his prophetic masterpiece The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times--can really open your eyes.

René Guénon was basically a Good Guy. His intentions were admirable; his intellect was brilliant. But like the rest of us he couldn't foresee all the effects of his actions. As we can see from his book The Crisis of the Modern World, he hoped to bring religious intellectuals back to traditional metaphysics--but by the time he wrote The Reign of Quantity after World War II he realized this wouldn't be possible. 

So he concentrated instead on providing a profound metaphysical analyses of the End Times.  For that alone, not to mention his profound presentations of the world religions--especially Hindu Vedanta--and his insight into how the Luciferian shadow of true religion was destined to rear its ugly head in these Latter Days, we are all in his debt. 

-------------------------------

Charles Upton, 65, is an American Muslim, metaphysician, poet, veteran of the 60's counterculture, and sometime antiwar activist. He has published 4 books of poetry and 13 in the genres of metaphysics and what he calls "metaphysics and social criticism". He is co-editor of The Covenants of the Prophet Muhammad with the Christians of the World by Dr. John Andrew Morrow, and conceiver of the Covenants Initiative; he is now working on a book entitled Day and Night on the Sufi Path. 


-------
Short YouTube Intro 
Guenon quotes - You Decide 
More quotes

Makow Comment-  I am grateful to Charles for this explanation. Personally,  I don't seek wisdom by plumbing complex metaphysical systems. The Kingdom of Heaven lies within. The only Truth that makes any difference emanates from your soul. I subscribe to poet Henry More (1614-1687) who said: 

"When the inordinate desire after knowledge of things was allayed in me,  and I aspired after nothing but purity and simplicity of mind, there shone in me daily a greater assurance than ever I could have expected, even of those things which before I had the greatest desire to know." 

 ---



"Bad Guy" -- First Comment from David Livingstone



I wrote two articles recently on Guenon. His traditionalism was just an extension of Theosophy. And when he "converted" to Sufi islam, he become closely associated with a mentor of the Muslim Brotherhood. He was part of an entire network that infiltrated Sufism, starting with Abdul Qadir al Jazairy, who was the head of a hub of spies in Damascus.

It's all part of a Sufi conspiracy that later involved Guenon's students. But his most famous pupil was Julius Evola, the guru of the Gladio operatives. It's an extension of the enduring relationship between fascists, neo-Nazis and Muslim terrorists.

Guenon also influenced Sayyed Husain Nasr, the Iranian professor, who was part of the Club of Rome conspiracy to place the Ayatollah in power. That links him with Idries Shah and the tradition from Gurdjieff, which is the key origin of the Sufi tradition linked to MK-Ultra and the New Age.

I also wrote another article to put another of Guenon's disciples in perspective: Alexandr Dugin. Another fascist with ties to Islamic terrorism. He's part of a CIA plot to create a neo-Caliphate, that involved using al Qaeda agains the Chinese in East Turkestan.

That was along with the Turkish Gladio, Ergenekon, which is a Turkish version of Agartha, which is revered by Guenon and other synarchists as the home of the "King of the World" (Satan).

Essentially, there are a few people who are central of the conspiracies of the 20th century, which incorporate the New Age, fascism and MK-Ultra, and Guenon is a central character, along with Blavatsky and Gurdjieff.




Marcos adds:




René Guenon was first and foremost an occultist. He was a disciple of Papus, née Gerard Encausee, one of the leading Satanists of the XIX century. He was also a deceiver, a Mason who used to write under a pseudonym in anti-masonic magazines, in what can only be described as disinformation.


Guenon followers like to say that he was just a scholar who studied the occult, but he was a heavy occultist himself. He had a squabble with theosophy, but this was a fight among factions of Luciferianism more than anything. He thought he was more cultured than they were.


Guenon later converted not to orthodox Islam, but to the highly occult Sufic order of Shadhilites. Sufism is basically magical and occultic Islam, so he really stayed the same occultist as ever. He did that after he found out he would not be successful in infiltrating Christianity with occultism as he wished, so he moved from France.


Guenon basically became a protegé of a Sheik for the rest of his life. The main point of Guenon's philosophy is that one can be a witch, work magick and occult sciences and still be externally a respected member of a cultural religion. He was a saboteur, his philosophy is a poison that intended to kill traditional religions from within.

So, yes, Guenon was a very evil man.






Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "René Guénon: Good Guy or Bad Guy?"

Lisa said (February 8, 2014):

The writer states that Sufi Islam is traditional Islam.This is not correct. It is a sect .Islam is strictly Monotheistic , this means we pray directly to God and seek his help.Unlike for e.g Christians , we do not pray to/ through angels,priests, Jesus peace be upon him etc .Sufi sect does just that.Unfortunately a lot of people are attracted to this "mystic " sect , like a lot of people are attracted to New Age.

Sufi sect often pray to dead ,to graves, and are famous for their invoking and dealing with evil spirits/ demons.This is actually the gravest sin in Islam, setting up partners with Allah. If Rene Guenon was involved in the occult ,and followed the Sufi sect teachings ( which is basically occult in its nature ) then yes , he was a bad guy.I do want to state here that we may not know how he died ,perhaps he repented , distanced himself from all the occult , and died as in submission to God as a true Monotheist .


Jesper said (February 7, 2014):

Marcos, what a biased assessment of Guénon. Unfortunately, while Guénon´s existence has become more widely known and his books are more readily available (especially in the fine translations published by Sophia Perennis), the intellectual qualification of his potential readership appears to be in serious decline. But, as Chesterton said: “the objection to spreading anything all over the world is that, among other things, you have to spread it very thin”.

Marcos, I suspect you may be partly following Carvalho´s example in criticizing Guénon (though you forgot to mention the extravagant claim that it was Guénon´s “mission” to islamicize the West), despite the fact that Carvalho includes Guénon among his most important influences, or “gurus” as he says (http://www.olavodecarvalho.org/links.htm#3).
--

Marcos replies:

Olavo de Carvalho is a strong promoter of occultism, astrology and gnosticism, and Guenon is one of his heroes. Guenon, an obscure writer outside occultist circles, is only known in Brazil because of Carvalho's propaganda, and as a promoter of the Perennial philosophy, Olavo loves him. In the very link Jesper provided there is a quote: "Guenon, the most amazing intellectual miracle of our times".


Dan said (February 7, 2014):

I must advise being sure of a firm foundation in one's own religion before getting too deep into the writings of any adepts of metaphysics.
It helps to know the background of the era through which Guénon lived. He was 14 years old in 1900. The Roman Catholic Church was losing the war with Modernism, and the stakes were the Traditions of the Ages or this New World Order. (Guess who won?)

Guénon was among the few world class metaphysics adepts who remained against Modernism. He's not to lumped in with Nietzsche, or Crowley, and certainly not Madame Blavatsky. He did some damage to the Theosophical movement when it was at it's peak in Europe and America with a book:
Theosophy: History of a Pseudo-Religion and The Spiritist Fallacy.

Writing when he did, his anti-Modernism would have been very attractive to French Catholic seminary students but could have led many of them into Freemasonry. Guénon founded his own Freemasonic lodge in Paris called La Grande triade ("The Great Triad") after the name of the book he published in 1946, four years before he died. Guénon's Great Triad wasn't the "Father, Son, and Holy Spirit", but 'Heaven, Earth, Man'. So in my own case, that's enough to for me to know that we're not on the same team.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at