Direct Link to Latest News


FDR Was a Communist

March 30, 2014


"Democracy" is a charade designed to pacify

the sheeple.  Government is run by the 

Illuminati (Masonic) Jewish banking cartel.

FDR claimed he was not a Communist

but, as Dave Martin shows, his actions belied his words. 

by Dave Martin


FDR to HUAC Chair Martin Dies:

I do not regard the Communists as any present or future threat to our country, in fact I look upon Russia as our strongest ally in the years to come. As I told you when you began your investigation, you should confine yourself to Nazis and Fascists. While I do not believe in Communism, Russia is far better off and the world is safer with Russia under Communism than under the Czars. Stalin is a great leader, and although I deplore some of his methods, it is the only way he can safeguard his government.

His protestation of a lack of belief in Communism is completely belied by his words here and in many, many ways by his actions. Dies notes that those pro-Soviet, pro-Stalin views match what he told Cardinal Spellman in 1943:

His aide memoire is completely in accord with the opinions Roosevelt expressed to me over the years. Specifically, the President had said that Russia was our natural ally; that the Russian people were much better off than they had been under the czars; and that he thought that the Russians would get about forty percent of the world, and the capitalist regimes would retain sixty percent.

warleaders.jpg(Allied leaders were all Illuminati Jews. So was Hitler.)

Unfortunately, Roosevelt's policies seemed to have been designed to make sure that this prediction would come true. The Yalta Conference near the end of the war was just the capper on a global war strategy that from beginning to end could hardly have been better crafted to further the interests of Joseph Stalin and world Communism. Having been attacked by the Japanese, the American public along with many of the country's military leaders wanted a greater emphasis upon the Pacific theater and defeat of the Japanese and less upon the war with the Germans, but Stalin wanted it otherwise and that's what he got from Roosevelt.

In the battle against the Germans, our British allies favored an attack in the Eastern Mediterranean and up through the Balkans, but, again, Stalin wanted a different strategy from us. He feared that we would occupy Eastern Europe and dictate the peace in that area before his troops could arrive.

Stalin, therefore, pushed for us to attack across the English Channel at the earliest possible date to take German pressure off the Soviet Union while keeping non-Communist allied forces as far away from his sphere of interest as possible. Only fierce British resistance probably prevented the allies from making a premature attack across the channel, but we finally did carry out Stalin's wishes.

From the beginning we lavished supplies and equipment upon the Soviet Union far beyond the requirements of military necessity. Worst of all was Roosevelt's unilateral declaration at the Casablanca Conference early in 1943 that we would only accept unconditional surrender to conclude the war.

Huey_8.jpg( A slice of FDR's Cabalist Jewish Administration)

Our rigid adherence to that policy virtually to the very end* undercut the strong anti-Nazi elements within Germany, assuring that there would not be a separate peace between the non-Communist adversaries that would in some degree deprive the Soviet Union of the spoils of victory, and that the Japanese would continue to fight until the Soviet Union could enter the Pacific war and promote Communism in the East. This unconditional surrender policy resulted in the Roosevelt administration spurning a number of serious peace overtures from the anti-Nazi, anti-Communist military leadership of Germany in 1943. Later, we were to do the same thing with respect to the Japanese emperor.

Defenders of Roosevelt's complete capitulation to Stalin at Yalta argue that we were simply accepting facts on the ground achieved through Soviet military success, and there is some truth to it, but only because of previous concessions to Stalin at Tehran and through our overall pro-Soviet military strategy.

The absolute worst things Roosevelt did at Yalta were to agree to the return of refugees from Russia to their Soviet oppressors known as Operation Keelhaul and the offering of inducements to Stalin to enter the war against the Japanese. George N. Crocker in Roosevelt's Road to Russia best captures the folly of that last position:

[In Honolulu] on July 27 and 28, 1944, [FDR] had discussed the war in the Pacific for many hours with General Douglas MacArthur, who had flown up from Australia, and Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, commander of the naval forces in the Pacific. MacArthur and Nimitz, in the presence of Admiral William D. Leahy, had told him that "Japan could be forced to accept our terms of surrender by the use of sea and air power without an invasion of the Japanese homeland."

Since then, what was left of the Japanese fleet had been crushed in the Battle of Leyte Gulf in October, the Philippines had been retaken, B-29's were bombing Japan from Guam, Tinian, and Saipan, and Japanese peace feelers had been put out.

When Roosevelt went to Yalta, he kept MacArthur and Nimitz far away. He asked them nothing, told them nothing. In view of what he did at Yalta, this would seem an incomprehensible neglect on his part to avail himself of the counsel of the two men most qualified to give it. The only explanation that makes any sense is that he already knew what their advice would be, that it was not compatible with his plans, and that he did not welcome having their opinions--overwhelmingly authoritative as they would be--presented.

At this stage, elementary statesmanship, for the security of American interests in the Far East, required that the Soviet Union be, at almost any cost, dissuaded, discouraged, and forestalled from entering the war with Japan. Roosevelt went to Yalta and secretly did just the opposite. (pp. 242-243).


Related: See the pyramid hologram at recent nuclear conference. 

FDR's Jewish Braintrust


First Comment from Dan:

Don't get me started on Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  Let me just drop a couple of bombs people may not heard.   

An ancestor cousin of FDR lived in New York before the Civil War.  His name was Clinton Roosevelt, a politician who co-founded the "Equal Rights Party", slang name the "Loco Foco" Party, also known back then as the PEOPLE'S Party.   History books correctly say this group was the 'radical Left' of the day.  Among the members were Walt Whitman, and Horace Greeley.  These people exploited the Bank Panic of 1837 to promote Clinton's radically different economic scheme which was basically a prototype of the New Deal.  In fact Greeley helped him publish a book about it in 1841;  'The science of government, founded on natural law'. [1]

The book failed to catch fire in the minds of men, but Greeley knew of a promising young revolutionary writer in Germany: Karl Marx.  Marx was commissioned to write based on Roosevelt's material.  The result or course was the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO, published in 1848 just in time for the international Freemasonic revolutions across Europe and South America.   The revolts mostly failed, but the Manifesto caught on and became the 'Bible' of Communism.  Greeley made Marx European correspondent for Greeley's New York Herald Tribune - weekly - with titles like "Revolution and Counter-Revolution", introducing into American reader's minds such novel words as "bourgeoisie" and "proletariat".   Marx was a regular contributor to the Tribune during the Civil War, not only praising Abraham Lincoln, but corresponding with him. [2]

I could go on and on about Lincoln and Marx and their ties to 19th century occultists, but I'll stop here and leave it with this tidbit:  Didja know that Eleanor Roosevelt's maiden name was Eleanor Roosevelt?  

[2] An Unfinished Revolution: Karl Marx and Abraham Lincoln


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "FDR Was a Communist"

Milton said (March 31, 2014):

I have been reading The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed. He shows that Wilson and Roosevelt had a Jewish Palace Guard and they were dupes and tools who were mislead. Lloyd George and Churchill owed their status solely as a result of pandering to the Zionists/Talmudists agenda.

Dan said (March 31, 2014):

Tony B's comment [below] on the 'Blue Laws' or 'sabbath laws' makes it sound like it was a Jewish Conspiracy to have a monopoly on sales one day a week..

He's got it wrong. Blue laws never said "Christian stores must be closed on Sunday, and only Jewish owners can open". Didn't matter if you were a Hindu - the way the laws worked was what you could and could not sell on Sunday. No booze, no lingerie - plus you couldn't require employees to work on Sunday. I know of no state in the union that banned sales of cigarettes, gasoline, food, or toilet paper on Sunday. You could find some small grocers and pharmacies open.
The reason so many stores closed entirely was because local Christian store owners took the Bible seriously. Jews observed their sabbath on Friday night and Saturday.

Here in Texas last summer I was looking for an electric clock motor on Sunday, and the only place to get the one I needed was Hobby Lobby. I had to drive about 13 miles. When I got there it was locked up, said "SUNDAY: CLOSED". I remember mumbling under my breath, "what's the matter with these people? they must be losing a fortune to close on Sunday".

Later I told someone about this and they said, "Didn't you know it's family owned? The family is religious, so they close on Sunday to encourage their employees to go to church".

Hardly a Jewish conspiracy.

Tony replies:

Pennsylvania is not Texas. In those days it was exactly as I wrote in Pennsylvania. On Sunday NO STORES WERE ALLOWED TO BE OPEN EXCEPT JEWISH STORES. No ifs, ands or buts. That's exactly how it was.

There was one exception but not for stores, for bars. The American Legion bars and the Veterans of Foreign Wars bars did not have to close at midnight Saturday night as all others did have to. This exception was most likely due to the ongoing world war.

Dan can write what he pleases about Texas, but he is totally ignorant of Pennsylvania law at that time. I lived it, I did not dream it.

Texas is not the world, it is only Texas. I suggest Dan speak for what he knows, not what he assumes. His misinformation smacks of the typical Texas know-it-all attitude.

Tony B said (March 31, 2014):

Henry, it's never mentioned in the media but Barney Baruch was handed the U.S. economy, to play with as he wished, in both WW1 and WW2. He was behind the rationing in WW2 as well as the set "ceiling" on prices, etc. Nothing of consequence needed rationing in the U.S. save tires but every family's life was lived around the ration book during the war years. Even brand name cigarettes were taboo for the civilian. I remember at the old age of 11 or 12 I was buying Wings or Chelseas from the local Jew store for 15 cents a pack on Sundays when we at the orphanage were made to go to town to our generic church service. It was unlawful to sell cigarettes to anyone under 18 - or was it 21? - but, hey, a sale was a sale, right? Pennsylvania had "blue" laws then. The Jews had to close up shop on Saturday and everyone else had to on Sunday, giving the Jewish shops an absolute monopoly on Sunday sales.

Mark said (March 30, 2014):

Many years ago I read Major Jordan's Diaries. Apparently, we were sending strategic goods to Joe Stalin by air transport from Minnesota over the North Pole during WW2. Harry Hopkins , the progenitor of the project to equip the Soviets with everything they needed to fight Hitler and have nuclear weapons, was a big adviser to FDR.

Then there were the WW1 Bonus Marchers who were rallied by David Niles to foment what was supposed to be the US equivalent of the Russian Revolution, but General MacArthur quashed that and refused to take Nile's bait (Niles' marchers captured the DC chief of police and humiliated him in public).

Many years later, Niles, an adviser to both FDR and HST, got his revenge when Harry S. Truman de-mobed MacArthur - and the old soldier just faded away, his potential political career ruined by jibes that he wanted to be the American version of Caesar.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at