Direct Link to Latest News


Gender Chaos: "Fe-Males" Demand Rights at Women's Colleges

November 3, 2014

19transmen1-master675.jpg(Timothy Boatwright, center, a trans man, with his Wellesley classmates.)


Girls at women's colleges who have become "guys" 
are distracting feminists in more ways than one. 

"The female-identified students somehow place more value on those students," said Rose Layton, a lesbian who said she views trans students as competitors in the campus dating scene."

Thanks to universities like Wellesley, society continues to be inducted into a satanic cult. The ruling class will be more dysfunctional than ever. 

by Philip Wyeth

(The Left is eating Itself, and I Feel Fine)
(Abridged by

A New York Times Magazine article entitled "When Women Become Men at Wellesley"  reports colleges that admit only women are now under attack by transsexuals, girls that have become "males." 

When it was women trying to kick down men's doors, then it all made perfect sense, but now as transgender people cite their own emotional needs in seeking to change women's traditions, feminists are vulnerable.

The student body, [Wellesley's website] says, is "2,300 smart, singular women feeling the power of 2,300 smart, singular women together" on a campus where "our common identity, spirit and pride as Wellesley women" are celebrated. 

Those sorts of messages, trans students say, make them feel invisible. "I just wish the administration would at least acknowledge our existence," said Eli Cohen, left, a Wellesley senior who has been taking testosterone for nearly a year. "I'd be more O.K. with 'We're not going to cater to you, because men are catered to everywhere else in life,' rather than just pretending we don't exist."

What's a women's college to do? Trans students point out that they're doing exactly what these schools encourage: breaking gender barriers, fulfilling their deepest yearnings and forging ahead even when society tries to hold them back. But yielding to their request to dilute the focus on women would undercut the identity of a women's college. ... As a marginalized group fighting for respect and clout, how could women justify marginalizing others?

Yes, yes, yes! Once you've broken one gender barrier you simply cannot stop until you've broken them all! And sadly for women, they're next in line to be trampled by the zealots on their holy crusade to destroy gender identity


Take the case of Laura Bruno who inadvertently offended trans male student Kaden Mohamed during a TV interview.

The interviewer asked Laura to describe her experience at an "all-female school" and to explain how that might be diminished "by having men there." Laura answered, "We look around and we see only women, only people like us, leading every organization on campus, contributing to every class discussion."


Kaden (on the right) wrote that Ms. Bruno had been "extremely disrespectful":

"I am not a woman. I am a trans man who is part of your graduating class, and you literally ignored my existence in your interview. . . . You had an opportunity to show people that Wellesley is a place that is complicating the meaning of being an 'all women's school,' and you chose instead to displace a bunch of your current and past Wellesley siblings."

Booya! Welcome to your insight into what it's like to be an actual male, Laura. You didn't account for every possible variable while making a statement, one person got offended, and now there's hell to pay.

Laura apologized, saying she hadn't meant to marginalize anyone and had actually vowed beforehand not to imply that all Wellesley students were women. But she said that under pressure, she found herself in a difficult spot: How could she maintain that women's colleges would lose something precious by including men, but at the same time argue that women's colleges should accommodate students who identify as men?

Even the most politically correct of male professors finds himself exasperated as the worm turns against a true villain, the use of those hurtfully exclusionary pronouns:

All my life here," [sociology professor Thomas] Cushman said, "I've been compelled to use the female pronoun more generously to get away from the sexist 'he.' I think it's important to evoke the idea that women are part of humanity. That should be affirmed, especially after being denied for so long. Look, I teach at a women's college, so whenever I can make women's identity central to that experience, I try to do that. Being asked to change that is a bit ironic. I don't agree that this is a 'historically' women's college. It is still a women's college."

faceofthenwo.jpg(left, the face of the NWO)

But not according to our friend Eli: "I don't necessarily think we have a right to women's spaces. But I'm not going to transfer, because this is a place I love, a community I love. I realize that may be a little selfish. It may be a lot selfish."

Don't worry about it, you're on the right side of history. Eh, sibling? Just as women selfishly pushed themselves into men's spaces like golf clubs--those rare spheres where men could enjoy some time to fraternize away from their wives--now trans men find that serving their own desires trumps traditionally oriented women's need to feel safe and comfortable.


Another difficult conversation about trans students touches on the disproportionate attention they receive on campus. "The female-identified students somehow place more value on those students," said Rose Layton, a lesbian who said she views trans students as competitors in the campus dating scene. "They flirt with them, hook up with them. And it's not just the hetero women, but even people in the queer community. The trans men are always getting this extra bit of acknowledgment. Even though we're in a women's college, the fact is men and masculinity get more attention and more value in this social dynamic than women do."


(Transgendered students. The new hot sexual commodity on campus.) 

Wah wah for Rose and her fellow lesbians! They used to be the only novelty in town, coaxing curious straight freshmen to experiment sexually after a few drinks--but now Teena Brandon's elbowing "his" way into the monopoly. Whatever happened to tolerance? But wait, there's more!

Kaden Mohamed said he felt downright objectified when he returned from summer break last year, after five months of testosterone had lowered his voice, defined his arm muscles and reshaped his torso. It was attention that he had never experienced before he transitioned. But as his body changed, students he didn't even know would run their hands over his biceps. Once at the school pub, an intoxicated Wellesley woman even grabbed his crotch and that of another trans man.

It's this very bizarre reversal of what happens in the real world," Kaden said. "In the real world, it's women who get fetishized, catcalled, sexually harassed, grabbed. At Wellesley, it's trans men who do. If I were to go up to someone I just met and touch her body, I'd get grief from the entire Wellesley community, because they'd say it's assault -- and it is. But for some reason, when it's done to trans men here, it doesn't get read the same way. It's like a free pass, that suddenly it's O.K. to talk about or touch someone's body as long as they're not a woman."

What's this now? Women who dress and act like men being objectified by other women?! A double standard favoring women over men? No! I can't believe! My brain feels like I'm eating Breyers mint chocolate chip ice cream, this moment is just too savory for words!!!


But sadly, that party is over. All natural born men who aren't trans or post or anything else should drink a shot of espresso and read this next paragraph with eyes wide open:

Last month, Mount Holyoke College announced a more far-reaching policy: It would admit all academically qualified students regardless of their anatomy or self-proclaimed gender, except for those biologically male at birth who still identify as male. In a list that reflects just how much traditional notions of gender have been upended, Mount Holyoke said eligible candidates now include anyone born biologically female, whether identified as woman, man, neither or "other" and anyone born biologically male who identifies as a woman or "other." The school president, Lynn Pasquerella, said she and her officers made the decision after concluding it was an issue of civil rights.

Did you get that? Everyone in the country is part of a special interest group except biological males who act like males. 


First Comment from Richard: (Warning- Description of Gender Reassignment )

I used to know lots of dyke feminists the other 'gender identities' during 40 years as a leftist in the 'arts'.  Most of them know these  days not admit to "straight people" that they think of 'men in transition' as males.  Probably it's the pheromones - no dosage estrogen shots can change the aroma.I hate to be disgustingly graphic, but somebody has to do it: a post-op tranny's "V-gaga" is an inverted scrotum.  That's right - the surgeon removes the testicles and prostate, and fills the internal space with the emptied scrotum tissue. 

Doctors don't call it a 'sex change' anymore because that's impossible.  "Gender reassignment" is nothing more than extreme cosmetic surgery to appease a mental disorder.  40 years of statistics show no reduction in 'Gender identity disorder' [1]  ability to integrate into healthy society or the suicide rate that goes with obsession to be something you can never be.  

These poor souls suffer the delusion that "sex reassignment" can magically turn them into the opposite sex.  Once it's done and see the results for what they are, "51% attempt suicide, have deep regret, or cannot adjust".

These people need treatment for the psychological disorder - not unisex public bathrooms, and false hopes.
'Obamacare Now Pays for Gender Reassignment'
"The nation's health law opens the door for transgender people to gain coverage for gender reassignment surgeries they previously could not afford."

'Obamacare forcing 14 percent cut in Medicare's home health care program'

"An estimated 3.5 million poor and ill homebound senior citizens will wake up on New Year's Day to discover Obamacare has slashed funding for their home health care program."

Why is "Obamacare" bent on funding this extremely expensive procedure with 0% benefit to tax payers, yet condemning poor  disabled people to death from negligence?

The only way it makes sense if Obamacare's goal is maximum population, since sex 'reassignment' surgery actually shortens their lives.  As for taking away home care for the homebound - the increase in deaths is self evident.

[1] Gender identity disorder is classified as a medical disorder by the  DSM-V

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Gender Chaos: "Fe-Males" Demand Rights at Women's Colleges"

Hillary said (November 5, 2014):

Tony B! Do you or the haters claim to be Christian? Those that think they will be the first into the kingdom of heaven will be last, and the last first. None of us are worthy of heaven anyway, we're all sinners of the highest order..remember that and be humbled, for only God is the true judge.

I am one of those male-to female transsexuals and I dare anyone to have been in my shoes when I was undergoing the mental torture since birth prior to the decision, that was nearly fifteen years ago. Ask me if I have regrets; yes of course I do, I broke God's laws, but the mental torture itself lasts a lifetime. I am in repentance, are you for your sin!

I am not part of the trans-community and I don't advocate transsexual operations nor do I try and attract men. I am single and wish to stay that way. I have lost all my old friends, partner, Army colleagues from the British Airborne Forces and my beautiful daughter and family. All I have left is my cat, my 93 year old friend, a younger woman friend, the church and God and I am in my forties, but I don't want the death penalty, we're all already under that threat, but that subject is for another day.

Being a 'keyboard commando' at a distance, Tony B and others; is nothing, it's all hot air. If you're tough enough, do the three week British P Company(pre-parachute selection course and achieve 4 'A's and 4 'B'-toughest in the world, back in 1989) then come back to me. Oh I forgot there's also the 3.5 weeks of hell to warm you up before the course, which 50% fail. You'd be one of those I reckon. You see Tony B I am a survivor and surprisingly a happy one. Haters like you are really self-haters because you have learned nothing about the value of life's true meaning and reflect it in your own insecurity, but I forgive you, I don't know why...maybe because I have faith.

Tony B said (November 3, 2014):

The sooner all these freaks are down the toilet the better. Who gives a damn about their oh, so offended, bullshit?

I'd really offend them. My message to them is to get straight or get dead. Why the hell should I allow these assholes to destroy the family, making life miserable for my grand kids? Give them the death penalty, that's what they're giving themselves anyway. Just do it now before they harm any others.

Morality 101: Toleration of evil is itself evil. It is not Christian or any other true moral code to tolerate this crap. Destroy it or it will destroy you.

CR said (November 3, 2014):

Welcome to Sodom & Gomorrah. This article shows the inevitable progression of sexual deviancy and gender confusion that has resulted from the legalization of sodomy in the western world combined with the new "gender-neutral" agenda.

Like several of your article have mentioned, the Illuminati want to degrade humanity to the level of animals. With all these freaks pushing for the right to use bathrooms of a gender they don't belong to, the next step will be genderless bathrooms, changerooms, and shower facilities where men, women, children, and deviants of all sorts are welcome. Maybe a better solution would be changing the bathrooms from men/women to straight/other. I don't think that normal men get excited by women sitting on a toilet, as long as we can respect each other it is much better than having to share a bathroom with drag queens and female faggots like these. Otherwise I might have to start wearing a diaper when I go out in public.

Al Thompson said (November 3, 2014):

The gender game is a loser for all of those involved. Obviously, it is being used as an anti-social battering ram. The left is destroying itself and everyone tied in with them is a loser. There does seem to be a bit of poetic justice to this, but the facts show that the females are still naturally attracted to men or masculinity even though they would like to deny it.

College and universities are just another form of prison camps for social depravity.
I personally don't think public education should even exist and the evidence for my view is there for all to see. Private colleges aren't much better. So unless someone is going to learn something that will give them marketable skills, then there isn't any sense in attending.

The attempted twisting of gender will not go anywhere. Nature will always recover from the problem; it always does and no amount of perversion is going to change it.
This will all pass and will end up into the cesspool of history.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at