Direct Link to Latest News


Promiscuity is Hidden Agenda of Sex Education

February 17, 2015

sex-education-007.jpgGovernment-funded sex education groups promote promiscuity

and homosexuality while downplaying the health and psychological risks associated with premature sexual activity, says psychiatrist Miriam Grossman.

I would go further and say the normalization of pedophilia

and "inter generational sex" is the ultimate objective.

"What Advocates for Youth is saying is that ... the notion that we are all either male or female is a repressive ideology."

by Miriam Grossman MD

You're Teaching My Children What?

(abridged by

Not long ago, I noticed a steady stream of students, most of them female, who were paying a high price for their sexual choices. I spent hundreds and hundreds of hours with these students, and they are the reason I'm writing this today....

There is a man-made epidemic of ignorance: ignorance of biological truths that should be central in any sex ed curriculum or parent education program.

I put the responsibility for the epidemic of ignorance directly on those organizations that are at the helm of teaching sex education:

SIECUS (Sexuality Education Council of US; Planned Parenthood; Advocates for Youth.) Contrary to their claims and promises, their programs are not comprehensive; they are not science-based or medically accurate or up-to-date.

I'll go even further: They are not about preventing disease. Sex ed is a social movement. Its goal is to change society. Their primary goal is to promote sexual freedom and to rid society of its Judeo-Christian taboos and restrictions.

In this worldview, almost anything goes. Each individual makes his or her sexual choices; each person decides how much risk he or she is willing to take, and no judgments are allowed.

The science that is used is selective. If it challenges this model of human sexuality, if what's seen under the microscope threatens this dream for society, it doesn't exist.

These eminent groups deceive the public and endanger the health and well-being of our children. The list of their crimes is long. Duplicity is one: promising one thing and doing another. ...



My third example is that of Advocates for Youth and their approach to gender. This past August, in the House of Representatives, there was an amendment that ...would grant $50 million to organizations that promote the type of sex education that I've described. In response to that, the president of Advocates for Youth stated that this move would bring science back into sex education.

I found that astonishing, because when you go to the Web sites of Advocates for Youth--and there are many; this is a very large organization that has a lot of resources--science is one thing that is missing.

Advocates for Youth is telling kids that gender, the internal feeling of whether one is male or female, is completely separate from biology, from one's anatomy and one's chromosomes. It's an internal feeling, they say.

johnmoney.jpgThis goes back to the gender theory of John Money, left, a notorious psychologist from Johns Hopkins who introduced these radical ideas in the '50s and '60s. The idea again is that one's identification of being male or female is a result of one's internal feelings.

Advocates for Youth not only promotes this, but it tells kids that gender, being male or female, exists on a spectrum. Male and female are at the extreme ends of that spectrum, but it is a wide spectrum with many possibilities in between male and female.... What Advocates for Youth is saying is that Robert does not become Roberta and Roberta does not become Robert, but that they become neither Robert nor Roberta; that there are many possibilities in between, and that the notion that we are all either male or female is a repressive ideology.

What they're telling kids is that newborns are designated male or female, they're wrapped in the blue or pink blanket, and then they're socialized to fit cultural expectations. Messages from their environment teach them masculine or feminine behaviors, interests, and ways of relating. But when a boy insists he's a girl or vice versa, that should not be a concern, says Advocates for Youth. It is, they claim, "as normal as being alive."

The premise that there are only two genders, male or female, is inaccurate, they say. It restricts our freedom of gender expression. The idea that an individual must be one or the other, male or female, is an arbitrary, repressive paradigm. It's another noxious "ism," like sexism.

This organization that claims to bring science back into sex education teaches that gender can change. A 10-year-old might be certain she's a girl, but at 20 she might realize she's a man. People can realize their gender at any point in their lives, young people are told. Is this the "science" that they're referring to? Or perhaps instructing children that they could be male, female, both, or neither is an example of the critical sexual health information they need to make responsible decisions about their lives.


This lesson on gender is not only unscientific; it's a departure from reality. Here's what real science in this century says about being male or female. Cell biology indicates that the Y chromosome is teeming with units of DNA that are unique to males. There are distinct male and female blueprints from the moment of conception. Embryology provides evidence of the earliest activity of those genes: Eight weeks after conception, when the embryo is the size of a kidney bean, the Y chromosome directs the testes to produce testosterone. The testosterone travels to the brain, enters the neurons, and propels the development of a distinct boy brain with smaller centers for communication, observation, and emotional processing and larger centers for sex and aggression.

Neurobiology maps out the complex and widespread differences in male and female brains. MRIs create color images that highlight distinct boy and girl patterns of thinking and feeling. Infant development reveals that at one day of age--presumably before children have been socialized to meet society's expectations--girls show a stronger interest in the face, while boys look longer at a mobile. At one year, girls are drawn to a video of a face moving, and boys prefer the video of cars moving.

I love this one: The typical toy preferences of children are also found in juvenile monkeys. Females like dolls, and males prefer vehicles and balls. Sexual stereotypes in the animal kingdom? Male and female are culturally assigned? Gender is a feeling separate from hormones and chromosomes? I don't think so. Advocates for Youth lesson plans are based on last century's social movements and the wish to blur the distinctions between male and female. Anyone following this century's hard science knows that those moth-eaten theories have been discredited.

But in sex ed class, these discoveries don't exist. Students are being force-fed an ideology from 50 years ago: Gender is man-made, sex ed educators insist. Cultures teach what it means to be a man or a woman. Are they stuck in a time warp or just completely blinded by ideology? Either way, it spells disaster for young people.


I was told in a recent interview that I must be exaggerating: that it must be hyperbole when I say sex education is madness, that it teaches untruths and that it exposes our kids to smut. If that's true, I was told, wouldn't there be congressional hearings?

I am not exaggerating: This is madness. The priority for SIECUS, Planned Parenthood, and Advocates for Youth is not the health and well-being of young people. These federally funded organizations are fighting "repression" and "intolerance," not herpes or syphilis. To them, it appears the blisters and the warts, the worry and the depression, can be tolerated, but the "isms" must go.

From the thousands of hours I've spent with students, I can affirm that when sexual freedom reigns, sexual health suffers. Our kids are being taught that you can play with fire, and the waiting rooms of doctors and therapists are filled with people who've been burned, inside and out. Is every young person going to postpone sex? Of course not, but we are obligated to inform them of the risks they face and to teach them biological truths, even when they are politically incorrect.

The only power that I have to fight this calamity is the power of the pen. While the nation struggles over issues related to health and stands on the verge of supporting organizations like SIECUS with millions of tax dollars, it's my hope that my message will reach the ears and the heart of someone with authority who will have the courage to stand up and put an end to this fiasco.


--Miriam Grossman, M.D., is a board-certified child, adolescent, and adult psychiatrist who writes and speaks to parents, students, educators, and health professionals internationally on the dangers of political correctness and incorrect science in her profession. She is the author of You're Teaching My Child What?: A Physician Exposes the Lies of Sex Education and How They Harm Your Child and Unprotected: A Campus Psychiatrist Reveals How Political Correctness in Her Profession Endangers Every Student.


Thanks to Linda K for sending this! 

Related - Five-Year-Olds in England to get Sex ed Ostensibly to Recognize Pedophiles

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Promiscuity is Hidden Agenda of Sex Education "

Dan said (February 18, 2015):

Syphilis and HIV (AIDS) has been on the rise in the urban enclaves, but you'd never know it because it's under reported in general public media.

Austin Texas, a university party town known for it's open hedonism 40% increase of HIV infection rate since 2006. The Center for Disease Control reported 20% increase nationally between 2008-2010 alone.

Dr. Philip Huang, the medical director and health authority for the Austin/Travis County Health and Human Services Department said the problem with HIV is denial that there are consequences of promiscuity. .

An example of that mentality is the 'National Gay Blood Drive', a highly funded media campaign to do away with the ban against homosexuals donating blood*. This ban is not politically motivated. It's not religious. CDC said in 2010 that "20% of "gay" men are HIV positive and half don't know it."

It's always been known that there's a "death wish" aspect promiscuity and sexual deviancy.


AH said (February 17, 2015):

Hi Henry - I remember when I was 13 and my sister a year older, we were sat around the kitchen table one night with mum and dad along with our older cousin, who was a trained nurse. We were going to be given "the talk" but we were both very nervous about it. Sex was never discussed back then, until you came of age.

Brought up by rather staid Catholic parents, we both lived a sheltered life as far as worldly thing went. Any trouble in the house or neighbourhood, or "adult issues" were always discussed and dealt with by them - never by us.

As it stood, that gathering didn't go all that far - us young'uns were rather sheepish most of the way through and it would have been easier for the adults to sit there prising open clam shells than to elicit a response from us.

Sex was talked about by senior primary school kids, but it was all a joke. There was never any serious talk about it and back then. In the late 1960's and early 1970's, "sex education" didn't exist in any school that I was aware of. It was definitely the job of mummy and daddy to talk about "the birds and bees".

We ran a dozen chooks on our quarter acre block back then, and every so often, mum would take us down the back when the rooster and the lady of his choice were "mating" - and that was about as close to "sex education" we ever got, before our mid teenage years, when it began to become rife in high school during the mid to late 1970's.

Some may think that our upbringing was rather sheltered and prudish and it was, but we are both still alive, have no criminal records and are beginning to enjoy our early retirement.

Thank you mum and dad...

Al Thompson said (February 16, 2015):

here's a comedian who made the profound statement: "You can't fix stupid." Sex education is just plain stupid. That kind of subject matter should be left to the parents, and not some asshole with a degree in stupidity. Sorry for the language, but there's nothing in the English language that describes these people better.

The intent is to strip away all of the proper morals and values present in the natural order, and to put forth intellectual sewage. Young children will be damaged by this and sex-ed is just an official form of child abuse.

Remember, these satanists like to take all of the good things in life and twist them into evil. Government is not here to help you. They have their satanic agenda that they will spew upon your children. Take the children out of school as there is very little education going on anyway.

This is like vomiting upon the child and then telling them it's good. All government schools should be shut down permanently.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at