What's Behind the Measles Vaccination Hysteria?
February 6, 2015
that the vaccination hysteria is actually a covert drive to
preserve the enormous profits of the pharmaceutical companies
which manufacture these nostrums?
Flashback- Measles back in the days before marketing of vaccines (YouTube)
Part Two - Intimidation of "Anti-Vaxxers"
Example of the invective (hatred) spewed on people opposed to taking vacs for a harmless disease. Further proof mass media is your enemy.
By Michael Hoffman
On the basis of the alleged sovereignty of her body, a pregnant woman may choose to kill her unborn baby in an abortion, but that alleged sovereignty then vanishes when obligated to submit to a needle full of chemicals ordered by the government, under the rubric of vaccination.
What is the mysterious etiology of early-onset dementia, epidemic rates of allergies and cancer, and other diseases either not seen at all or not seen at these rates prior to the 1970s?
How is it that FDA-approved prescription medications are the fourth leading cause of death in America, with more than 100,000 deaths per year (Wall Street Journal, Feb. 3 p. B-8), about which the media report marginally and anemically in their back pages, if at all, while a hundred or so cases of measles rings every alarm bell in their arsenal of national mass panic?
Is there anything superior to natural immunity? To what extent is natural immunity impeded or enervated by vaccinations? Is it prudent to imagine that something so powerful as a vaccination, which can halt symptoms of certain powerful diseases, has no other effect either physiologically or on our immune system? It is completely rational to believe that vaccinations have no contraindications ("side effects") other than slight fever, vertigo or inflammation at the injection site?
(left, This chart tends to confirm claims of vaccine supporters.)
Because many "scientists" sign off on the safety and efficacy of vaccinations does that signify that "Science" is on the side of the vaccinators? When is Science degraded into scientism? How many know the difference?
"Scientists," with the infallible omniscience they imagine they possess, claim that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are completely safe to consume, even though such alleged safety can only be truly determined by decades of testing of those who ingest those substances.
"Scientists" claim there is no nutritional difference between organic crops and crops to which poison sprays have been applied.
"Scientists" say there is no nutritional difference between unpasteurized natural milk from grass-fed cows, and milk from cows treated with recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) and confined to feed lots where they are fed GMO grains.
Could it be that, despite the "scientific" cover being provided, that the vaccination hysteria is in actuality a covert drive to preserve the enormous profits of the pharmaceutical companies which manufacture these nostrums?
We live in insane times where the same physicians who insist we must all be vaccinated on scientific principles, assert on those same alleged principles, that a female impersonator who has never menstruated and never will menstruate, and who has no womb or other anatomical ability to give birth, becomes, after the injection of hormones and chemicals, a transgendered "woman." Those who tell the simple truth about this masquerade are labeled by the same media that pushes vaccinations, as guilty of bigotry; indeed of "hate crimes."
We live in insane times, where the pain of an innocent baby in abortion is of negligible concern to campaigners for the pain-free execution of convicted murderers.
With the decline of Biblical religion and faith in the God who inspired that Bible, man searches for an idol to worship -- one that possesses god-like qualities. Science has become a religion for a society that condemns any enforcement of God's Law as superstitious fanaticism, but insists on the enforcement of the law of man according to the god of scientism.
No lengthy philosophical disquisition is necessary in order to discern that the insanity we observe in our society has its root in this fundamental transgression against the First Commandment.
Michael Hoffman is a Christian historian who writes from Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. His latest book is Usury in Christendom. He is the executive editor of Revisionist History, a newsletter published six times a year.
This column is a reader-supported service
FIND IMPORTANT RESOURCES: browse our selection of revisionist history and conspiracy books, CDs, DVDs, newsletters and more: http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page7/page7.html
E-MAIL: hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org (substitute @ for "[at]" in the preceding e-mail address)
FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: @HoffmanMichaelA
THE HOFFMAN WIRE IS A PUBLIC SERVICE of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA. Copyright ©2015. All Rights Reserved.
Related- Putting Measles into Perspective
----------- Fifth Toronto Measles Patient was Fully Vaccinated
------------- Measles Outbreak Not Related to Non Vaccination Trend
-------------- Measles Vaccine Research is Fraudulent by Mike Adams (Thanks Mike B)
--------------Truther Girl- Blaming the Unvaccinated -Disney Psy op
First Comment from AC:
For people of European or African ancestry, measles usually is not a big deal, but for Native Americans it can be fatal.
We must look at each vaccine separately, some are helpful, I have seen time and time again vaccines stop costly epidemics cold among livestock. I can't in good conscience say that vax do not work.
But according to a personal acquaintance that worked many years in a vax lab, contamination with other organisms was more often the case than not. It is almost impossible to avoid these contaminations. These were marketed anyway. This is one theory on how AIDS spread so quickly through contaminated hepatitis vax.
One must also take into account the carriers in the vax, some are toxic and some people seem to be more sensitive than others to these. The labs privately know this, but are doing little to make changes.
Vax are not 100% safe, but they have saved millions of lives in spite of some people having bad reactions or worse.
To say that all vax is bad is a mistake. It must be taken on a batch to batch basis. There will always be a risk in most everything. But going through tetanus is something I would take the risk to avoid rather than to suffer from it.
Will I take flu shots? No, seems that people get the flu anyway. Gardasil? I won't let my girls take it.