Direct Link to Latest News


Superman Film Depicts Rising Luciferian Order

June 12, 2015

Superman represents Christ, while Batman is Satan. 


by Aspen

The upcoming film BATMAN VS. SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE, due next Spring, is the most openly anti-Christian "comic book" film in cinematic history. This film pits "dying" Christianity against the rise of the Luciferian Order.

Each Hollywood film and TV series represents both the spiritual battle AND the physical battle that is tearing our world to pieces. The X-MEN have done their part for the Sexual Pervert Agenda. The AVENGERS have openly presented the supersoldier program and resurrected the Norse Gods of the Nazi eugenics Master Race cult...while stating that "aliens are coming to attack us for the final battle".

Yet within all comic book lore, Superman is and always has been the exclusive, superior, defining, and mocking, metaphoric representation of the Son of God.

The first instalment of this film series, MAN OF STEEL, contained many Biblical markers. I'll point out two of them. Under interrogation, Superman gave his age as 33 years (the age at which Jesus Christ was crucified), and at one point in the film he floated off into Earth's atmosphere in an iconic posture of crucifixion. There were also messages of infant sacrifice and centralized genetic control.

At the same time, Batman has represented Satan, and human PRIDE gone demonically mad in its WAR against God. By means of superior technology, deception, and a hidden agenda, Satan and his human adjuvants believe they can actually make war upon the Son of God.


Following is a partial transcript of the BATMAN V. SUPERMAN teaser trailer Voice-Over:

VO:  "Is it really surprising that the most powerful man in the world should be a figure of controversy? We, as the population on this planet, have been looking for a Savior... We are talking about a being whose very existence challenges our OWN sense of PRIORITY in the universe."

[Translation: Jesus is an affront to those who believe Humans have equality with God.
Romans 1:25 : They worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator.]

VO:  "Human beings have a terrible track record of following people with great power. Maybe he's just a guy trying to do the right thing."

[Translation: Time and again, the Enemy has worked to convince the world that Jesus was a "good man" with "nice intentions" and "great influence" and even possibly "a great prophet, but nothing more than that".]

VO:  "But we KNOW BETTER NOW, don't we? He's OUT OF CONTROL! Devils don't come from hell beneath us. They come from the sky."

[NOTE: As the world begins to acknowledge that WE ARE UNDER ATTACK by demons and devils, and as the tide turns against Jesus in this world, they seek to reverse the natural order, giving the finger to God and embracing the entities rising up from hell. Isaiah 55:9
For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways.]

VISUAL: We see an image of a statue of Superman with words painted in BLOOD-red, "FALSE GOD".

VO:  [chanting against Superman] Go home! Go home! Go home!

[NOTE: It was only a matter of time until the mockery of the Passion of Christ would be enacted once more, with heretofore unseen boldness. John 19:15
They cried out, Away with him! away with him! Crucify him!]

FINAL VISUAL: We see Batman in his black demonic horned garb, speaking to Superman, saying, "Tell me, do you bleed? YOU WILL."


We must as easily see Satan, in all of his insanity, plotting the death of Jesus Christ, growling at Him, "I will MAKE you bleed". And Satan DID make Jesus bleed -- that is, Jesus LET satan make him bleed -- all the while not understanding that the shed blood of Jesus was God's purpose from the beginning.

Satan has been kicked out of the Throne Room of God. He has been building a PHYSICAL ARMY, on OUR plane, to fight God. In the United States, they call it "Black Ops" and "DARPA".

Christopher Nolan knows about all of this. Every one of the Christopher Nolan-inspired and produced Batman and Superman films -- not to mention his other films -- holds fast to the ritual of spitting in the face of Jesus, and debasing the power of the BLOOD of Christ.

Note that I said "ritual" and not "habit", or "tradition". For satanists, such as those in Hollywood be, BLASPHEMY against the BLOOD is a REQUIRED RITUAL, and it is accompanied without fail by attention to spiritually-charged dates, times, BLOOD sacrifices, infestations of hypnotic symbolism, and focused witchcraft. Hollywood films ARE satanic rituals. [To see more about Christopher Nolan's knowledge of Mind Control techniques, see the article]


Satan has convinced his disciples that they can fight Jesus via mind-control technology, super-advanced quantum-level weapons (read: CERN), artificial intelligence, genetic attrition, destruction of the food supply, weather manipulation, and the development of the Nimrod-style Batman, the Human Superman, who is able to make war against the now unwelcome God-given saviour, the False God, the Son of God, alien to Earth.

Christopher Nolan, Zack Snyder, Frank Miller, Alan Moore, the Wachowski brother and "sister" (one of the brothers had a "sex change"), James Cameron, Lars Von Trier, Ridley Scott (and his ritually-sacrificed dead brother Tony Scott), Steven Spielberg, George Lucas (he's a total ignoramus and a do-nothing but I mention him because he has been such an effective tool), Paul Verhoeven, Roman Polanski, and about a hundred thousand other Hollywood, BBC, music industry, and comic art dupes believe that by perpetrating ritual kabbalistic blasphemy and forcing it upon the world, they are effective warriors for Lucifer.


"Do you bleed? You will bleed, even as the false Savior you worship shed His Blood and died as the Nameless Weakling. What we have hidden in the dark we will bring forth, and we will kill you. We will make your blood run like a river."

In soon-coming years (possibly months), True Christianity, NOT the Apostate Church, will be outlawed worldwide, and true followers of Christ will be told to "go home, go home, go home" --meaning, DIE.

First Comment from R Phoenix:

Aspen has Superman all wrong.  Superman was created by two, Jewish, writers and illustrators as a secular/kabbalistic alternative to Jesus.  Superman is Nietzche's "Uberman."  His narrative is based on Moses' from the Bible.

He lived on Krypton which could be code for "Krypto" as in "Crypto Jew."  His name is Kal-El, which is Hebrew for "Voice of God."  He is put in a small rocket and is sent to Earth, where he is raised by Earthly, Gentile parents from Middle America (Smallville).  This is analogous for Moses being bundled up in reeds and sent down the Nile, only to be plucked out of the waters by Pharaoh and raised in another culture/race.

Superman finds that his powers emerge on Earth amongst the mere mortals (Gentiles) and he has to hide them.  He takes a Gentile name, like many Crypto Jews do.  He becomes Clark Kent and conceals his Kal-El identity/powers.

This is a common theme for many Jews in the West.

Not only does he have to take on an assumed name, but he must portray himself as bumbling, incompetent and not quite a man.  Lois Lane is always gushing over Superman, but won't give Clark the time of day.  This reinforces the myth that Jewish men are superior and more attractive to non-Jewish women, especially when non-Jewish men are not only seen as ineffective, but viewed with a touch of scorn by Lois for being so weak.

Aspen's portrayal of Superman as an emblem of Jesus/Christ couldn't be further from the truth.  If anything, Superman is the Prince Of The Air (Lucifer) and Batman (Satan) and this film is about the battle between which force has rule over this domain.  

Christ and Christianity?  They're not even in the script.
Aspen replies:

Please allow me to respond to the pertinent comment offered by "R Phoenix".

The history of the creation of the character of Superman is given faithfully by R Phoenix -- in fact, numerous descriptions of Superman as, shall we say, "the perfect Jewish hero", are available to be discovered.

What I find remarkable about R Phoenix's response is twofold:

First, the suggestion that "Christ and Christianity are not even in the script".

I have to tell you, brother, CHRIST AND CHRISTIANITY are under attack in EVERY Hollywood script. It seems you haven't been paying attention, because if you had been paying attention, you'd know that, especially if you've been visiting on a regular basis.

Secondly -- and this really caught my attention -- less than an hour before viewing the published version of this article, I was musing over writing an article about the COMING DECLARATION OF THE FALSELY SEPARATE BEINGS OF "LUCIFER" AND "SATAN".

This false separation between "Lucifer" and "Satan" -- MARK MY WORDS -- is soon to be all the rage. In some places,  mostly among the "false Elite" who fancy themselves to be part of the New World Order", it is already all the rage. Now it just has to trickle down to the masses. Or,  if R Phoenix is any evidence, it already has.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for " Superman Film Depicts Rising Luciferian Order"

Kaia said (June 14, 2015):

I must agree with R Phoenix's apt assessment. Christ, Christianity and, when viewed from the meta, the embodiment of Christ teachings is blaringly absent. The film's own plot description summarizes this nicely...

"Fearing the actions of a god-like Super Hero left unchecked, Gotham City's own formidable, forceful vigilante takes on Metropolis's most revered, modern-day savior, while the world wrestles with what sort of hero it really needs. And with Batman and Superman at war with one another, a new threat quickly arises, putting mankind in greater danger than it's ever known before." (IMDB)

This article ignores other key elements of the narrative as we are introduced to Wonder Woman, Aquaman and the Flash...more would-be false gods, who I suspect we see running around bumping into one other, creating the distractive theme of "who do we look to save us?".

In Christ's own words... “The kingdom of God does not come with observation; nor will they say, ‘See here!’ or ‘See there!’ For indeed, the kingdom of God is within you” While the citizens of Gotham and, we, the audience are guided to "see here!" and "see there!" ...we war with one another while looking to the external for salvation...when Jesus laid it out very plainly. Look within.

I don't see any evidence of this or Christ's message to " on another" in any of these films. ...nor in slanderous, anonymous comments that do nothing to further a thoughtful debate.

LM said (June 13, 2015):

This really just appears as a perversion of Frank Miller's comic novella The Dark Knight Returns.

There's too much borrowed from it to be original. It's just this time they've made Batman (who lives in reality and solves problems effectively) and Superman (the dutiful govt "patriot" politically correct stooge strong arm) the guy who's going to lose.

To me this is a message that the guys who made the country great - white guys in particular - you are not wanted anymore.

Imran said (June 13, 2015):

Aspen dude you got it all wrong. The previous Superman film had Superman as Satan who is helping to get mankind (Sophia) back to the celestial realms. Hence Jor-el's speech that Supes will inspire mankind so that they join him in the sun (representative of light of Sophia).

The evil Jesus in the first Superman "Man of Steel" was Zod. The new one won't have Superman as Jesus obviously. Goyer (the scriptwriter) put Sophia in as Rachael in her celestial version in Batman Begins. Nolan who according to the credits also wrote "The Dark Knight" with Goyer made Harvey the evil Jesus.

Skip to the 4:30 second mark. That proves that Rachael is Sophia. The third Batman "The Dark Knight Rises" has her as Catwoman (though now she needs Satan's help in ascending.)It is Bane who is the evil Jesus in the third part of the trilogy. And I am 90% certain Ra's is the evil Jesus in the first Batman Begins.

Where you have Sophia. You have Gnosticism. This is what the scriptwriters believe in.

Anonymous said (June 13, 2015):

Kudos to Aspen for the excellent article and for exposing R. Phoenix as a follower of the sex magik cult Children of God. They are sick pedophiles. Of course the fact that Superman has been used as a gnostic super jew 50 years ago doesn't prevent the current use as a Jesus figure, especially in a context where he is weak and a loser! They just exchanged the role of gnostic god to Batman, since it is more in line with today's efforts to spread stupid lies of immortality and transcendence thru transhumanism, technology, etc.

The public can"t see themselves as Supermen, but they are being trained to hope for a Batman-like technological upgrade. The Externalization of the Hierarchy requires that even the masses embrace gnosticism, not only the cabalist insiders.

That"s why we see this change. The movie is a model. These movies always have to be reviewed as small coadjuvants to a more all-comprising strategy. I would not be surprised to see a gnostic semi-god, transgender Cathlyn Batman on the next movie.

Dan said (June 12, 2015):

Every time I see the latest Hollywood rendition of "Jesus vs Satan" in the frame of a heavyweight championship boxing match, I smile. It shows complete ignorance of Christian monotheism. They have Christianity confused with Gnosticism - which is what they believe in. The Luciferian doctrine is dualism: we live in a 'yin yang' universe of light and dark (good and evil) forces. Each 'side' is equally powerful. They believe it's ignorant to try to be all good or all evil. They believe trying to be "all good" makes you weak, and is therefore pathetic - which is why they love to hate Jesus so much. They think that that 'enlightenment' is to be both good and evil. That's the meaning of 'Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. Love it the law, love under will'. It's an insidious delusion that enables people who know right from wrong, as we all do on some level at birth, to gradually excusing their own selfishness.

That paradigm is so deeply entrained in the movie industry that there's not really anyone involved with these movies that know how ridiculous the premise of movies like this are to other people. When Jesus said "my kingdom is not of this world", he wasn't referring to another planet in outer space. There was no contest. It wasn't about who could kick the other guy's ass.

"My Kingdom is not an earthly kingdom. If it were, my followers would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jewish leaders. But my Kingdom is not of this world."

I'll never forget the little school yard bully that lived across the street. His father was Shriner. He liked to play that he was Satan, and I was Jesus, or even 'let' me be God. Then he'd break one of my toys, or throw sand in my eyes, and roll with laughter.
That's the level of depth and intelligence of the makers of infantile action flicks like this that try to be something they're not.

I have to add, though, if you call yourself a Christian but also think 'the end time' and a coming battle between Jesus and Satan - you need study your religion deeper. There is no God of Evil to fight the God of Light.

Malcolm said (June 12, 2015):

The Voice Over (VO) in the trailer @ 0.24 says "Being" whilst at the same time another voice (under) growls "Alien".
It's not even subtle. Aspen's insights and understanding are always a "Revelation" and even this trailer strongly
hints at the subliminals Aspen has alerted us to in the plot.

Al Thompson said (June 12, 2015):

I really have to laugh at this story and the resulting comments. Regardless of this nonsense, the fact is that Superman is a fiction and it has nothing one way or the other. The whole satanic world revolves around lies and there are so many of them some of the lies are then used as a foundation for half-truths. When it comes Hollywood, of course there never a shortage of false information. I think a movie called "SuperJew" should be made with one drive through Beverly Hills in his Cadillac eating gefilte fish, with lox and bagels from Fairfax Ave.

The problem I have with Christian churches is that they aren't Christian in the biblical sense of the word. They all change the doctrine that appears in the bible, and one has to ask the question: Is Christianity of God or is it just another pagan cult? All of the modern "churches' use occultic symbols and the grossly distort the teachings. You can tell them by their fruit; it's rotten.

The only solution that I see that works is to keep the commandments that God put forth, but there are many christian "cults" that say keeping the commandments are not important. However, the commandments which are consistent with the natural law work very well and there are no other "orders" needed. All of the organized religions that I am aware of do not teach these things in a meaningful way. I don't see it much on the internet either.

MG said (June 12, 2015):

or the most part I agree with the writer especially about the Jesus-Superman comparison and what this upcoming movie looks to be.

But there are a couple things I disagree with as well as a couple factual errors:

First of all the factual errors: Christopher Nolan is not connected in any way to this movie as well as the last Superman movie (Man of Steel).

Know what I disagree with:

Batman - maybe in this upcoming movie Batman is depicted as the devil (we'll see when the movie comes out) but in general Batman more so represents humanity with all of it's good sides and bad sides. As a character he shows us that we have the potential to be really good but also we have the potential to fall into a deep dark abyss.

Christopher Nolan - I'm not going to argue that he might not be an Illuminati tool but what I will say is that I for the most part I do enjoy his movies and I think he is one of the most creative and imaginative directors in Hollywood right now.

I also think that with his last 2 movies: The Dark Knight Rises which ends with Batman saving Gotham and then starting a relationship with Selena Kyle (Catwoman) and what looks like a normal life and the unbelievably touching story of love and determination which is Interstellar (which I recommend to all) that his movies have made a turn to the positive.

Aspen replies:

To MG:

During the period prior to the inception of the "Man of Steel" script and production schedule, Christopher Nolan was close to being THE most sought-after storyline author / director / producer.

Nolan's BATMAN successes marked him as a box-office guarantee, and everyone was waiting to see how he would handle Superman.

"Paul Levitz stated in an interview that Batman holds the key to the Superman reboot. He elaborated, 'Everyone is waiting for Nolan to sign on for another Batman, once that happens, the release date for Superman and all other future projects will follow.'" []

To quote from THE ATLANTIC magazine:

"Ten years ago, the idea of Batman actually scaring people was far-fetched. So when Christopher Nolan's Batman Begins was released in 2005, one of its biggest achievements was revitalizing the Caped Crusader as a dark icon of intimidation.... It was a revolution.

"Nolan’s film allowed that superhero franchises could exist with one foot in the real world, and inspired legions of imitators to do the same...indebted to Nolan’s distinctive vision."
[source: ]

Nolan was intimately involved in the production of Man of Steel:

"[Screenwriter] David S. Goyer told Christopher Nolan his idea regarding how to present Superman in a modern context. Impressed with Goyer's concept, Nolan pitched the idea to the studio, who hired Nolan to produce and Goyer to write based on the financial and critical success of The Dark Knight." [source:]

As for Nolan's direct connection to the new film, Wikipedia says,

"In June 2013, it was announced that director Zack Snyder and screenwriter David S. Goyer would both be returning for a Man of Steel sequel...writing the script, and Christopher Nolan involved in an advisory role as executive producer."

There are many in the comic art community who care about the many criss-crossing superhero "universes", and who consider the Batman vs. Superman a "separate entity" because of its particular set of criss-crosses. However, in real terms, and despite that Christopher Nolan was far less directly involved in the production mechanics of Batman vs. Superman, the whole of it can be, and is, rightly named as his progeny.

Larry C said (June 12, 2015):

Henry, R. Phoenix needs to wake up and get with the program...

"I am devoting my lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the possibility that we are now entering a Jewish century, a time when the spirit of the community, the non-ideological blend of the emotional and rational and the resistance to categories and forms will emerge through the forces of anti-nationalism to provide us with a new kind of society. I call this process the Judaization of Christianity because Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes Jewish." Rabbi Martin Siegel, New York Magazine, January 18, 1972

Or could it be that R. Phoenix is well aware of the program and is doing his part? Could be.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at