(left, Topham with wife Shasta)
"I will share the email I sent to Monika who also expressed dismay in the verdict. It may help explain the verdict in context.
So many other sites are now picking up on the story as well.
Crown could ask for jail time but as you'll see in the email to Monika, they may have to wait a few years."
"The Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that, just as in the Russian revolutionm the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism." (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, 1939, Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 143-144).
Bless you! But please don't be sad. In truth it wasn't a sad day at all. It was a day of victory in so many ways which will soon come out once the world realizes how this trial actually unfolded.
We will get the transcript of the trial and place it on the Internet and in that way we will expand that little gallery which you were privy to in Quesnel's supreme courtroom so that the whole world will be able to sit in and listen to what was presented to the jury. We, the truth revealers around the world are the real jury and those sitting in the global gallery.
It was Justice Butler who ruled on the original Charter application back in June of 2015 and stated that it would be best to address that issue after the trial. Well, it's now after the trial and given that I was found guilty on Count 1 that is the basis upon which we can now take this Sec. 319(2) challenge right to the highest court in the land for adjudication.
At the moment the court system uses the Keegstra case to justify infringing upon our right to freedom of expression but as my defence counsel pointed out in our challenge, my case is far from what Keegstra's was. He was actually teaching his students in his classroom the truth and they were expected to answer questions in order to maintain their grades. While I find no fault with this of course given the context in which he was doing that it did set a negative precedent which allowed the SC of Canada to state that there were exceptions to our right to express ourselves.
(De facto Communism has been imposed on the West.)
In the case of R v Roy Arthur Topham the situation is far from being like Keegstra case. As well, we've now entered into the record all of the controversial documents which the censors have used for decades to stymie our basic human rights. Those documents will come into play in the Charter challenge and more and more people will be exposed to them which is another positive aspect of it all.
The challenge for me will be, as always, to garner the financial support from supporters around the world to carry the challenge through to the top. This means raising funds to cover the cost of the court transcripts which is the first and fundamental step.
Barclay Johnson (my counsel) and I had discussions about this prior to him catching his flight out to Vancouver yesterday. He said that he was going to make the application to appeal the guilty finding on the grounds that it infringes upon Sec. 2b of the Charter. We have only 30 days from the time of the verdict to do this. Once it's filed the rest of the process will unfold over what could very likely be a number of years. Unfortunately for Crown they will just have to wait to sentence me until the challenge has been heard and a decision is handed down by the Supreme Court of Canada.
I couldn't believe how quick Crown was in trying to get my bail conditions changed so she could restrict my right to publish on my site (and likely anywhere!). I think it even took Justice Butler off guard. Thank goodness he didn't fall for it and ordered her to make an application which will be heard next Thursday.
Hopefully this will clarify why I'm not all shook up at all over the outcome. Besides that, Barclay told me that a jury trial is not the type of trial that would set a legal precedent which would be helpful for others who might be attacked as I was/am. That type of precedent can only be accomplished by taking it to the SC of Canada and having the decision issue forth from the justices who preside there. By the time that occurs the people will be much better appraised of what we are truly facing in terms of our fundamental rights.
Love & Peace and eventual Justice for us all!
Donations can be made online via Arthur's GoGetFunding site or by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address.
Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to - Arthur Topham - and sent to:
4633 Barkerville Highway
New First Comment from Anon:
Let me ask you some questions -
The Canadian legislation is EASY to avoid! There are so many "get out of jail" clauses. Lets stop the bullshit - Arthur hangs with the nazi crowd. I have read his work. It is inflammatory in nature and in tone. Sure, it is the truth. But if any halfwit wishes to read the ACTUAL legislation it does not stop "reasoned" and "balanced" discussion of all things holocausty and jewishy supremacist in nature. Why make it difficult? The "nasty/nazi" crowd is a albatross around your neck. They seek to worship a man and an ideology that puts to death the weak and vulnerable, not protect them. Ultimately let the historians debate and discuss Hitler for the truth of his actual place in history - our job is to destroy Jewish Power - not rehabilitate Adolf Hitler. If he was a saint fine - but leave it for later.
That argument is "free speech" and "truth" when the legislation itself (the only thing that matters) tells you quite specifically that "free speech" does not exist and has never existed - there are always restraints on speech - and that "truth" is not the ultimate defense (though relevant to varying degree's) but HOW the "truth" is presented. Secondary to that and always lurking in the background is links with "evil nazi's".
I put "how the truth is presented" in italics, bold and underlined because no matter where this type of legislation exists - THAT is the central theme, except Germany where breathing "jews might have a problem" gets you jail but even that can be avoided with a little forethought and creativity.
People will now see the Arthur Topham case and remain intimidated - so they wont speak up because every twat keeps bleating "free speech" when the issue is not WHAT you are saying but the WAY you say it. Hence why Professor Kevin MacDonald still holds his post to this day at California State University and I must say he broaches some VERY sensitive issues that even make me cringe a little.