Direct Link to Latest News


Judaism: Black Magic, Sorcery, Pedophilia & Genocide

November 12, 2015


Left. The 'humane' transfer of ones sins to a chicken by swinging it overhead and 
then sacrificing it in a deal with Satan. 

Today, two items that confirm that Judaism is occult in nature.
1. A description of the "Kapporot" chicken ritual which clearly is sorcery.
2. A shocking transcript of a talk by former Yeshiva student Yossi Gurwitz who explains that the goal of religious Jews is genocide of non-Jews, especially Christians. Some believe religious Jews control the Illuminati.

Many Christians have inculcated Jewish notions of their own superiority but the respect is not reciprocated.
Gurwitz: "Christianity, which is the historical arch enemy of Judaism is going to get a serious beating once the religious zionists are in power. The Christian Fundamentalists who send them money apparently don't understand what they're dealing with. But you know, it's really a case of "a pox on both your houses". 

[Disclaimer: The vast majority of ethnic Jews consider themselves "secular," are not initiated in this satanic agenda, and many actually despise religious Jews. Nonetheless the Illuminati Jewish leadership may very well subscribe to this demented megalomaniac world view.]  

 1) Rabbinic guidelines for kosher execution of 'Kapparot' voodoo sin chicken ritual

Rabbinic guidelines for kosher execution of 'Kapparot' voodoo sin chicken ritual.
Rabbinic guidelines for the 'humane' transfer of ones sins to a chicken by swinging it overhead and then sacrificing it in a deal with Satan by slitting its throat; a ritual commonly believed by the dumb goyim to be 'not approved by the rabbis.' The dumb goyim also believe that this chicken, once filled with Judaic sins, is then given to some poor schmuck to eat as an 'act of charity.'


Posted by Maurice Pinay at 1:34 PM 

1 comment:
Eric Robinson said...
The Kapparot ritual should be enough to convince anyone that Judaism, especially when practiced as originally intended, is a depraved and idiotic religion. 

"The sages of blessed memory" were heavily influenced by the concepts of black magic.

Sephir Casidim, Fol. 25 Col. 3:

"When a man wants courage to conjure the Devil, he should pray to God to prevent the Devil from doing him hurt. There are some who say, one should prostrate one's self before him (the Devil?) on the ground; for that he will not do any mischief to those who show him submission."


Emeck Hammelech - Schaar Kirjath arba, Fol. 108 Col. 2

"Those in the Sanhedrin were obliged to know the art of sorcery, to the end they might judge, which was a real deed, and which only a semblance."

Juchasim Fol. 17. Col. 1:

"The Sanhedrin had need to understand the art of sorcery, that they may discern right for what sorcery the sorcerer is to be adjudged to death." 

"When one, on whom sentence had been passed, as an enchanter or wizard, had caused the light not to shine upon them (the judges of the Sanhedrin) they (the judges) put in use their necromantic arts, in order to destroy him."
October 7, 2014 at 11:52 PM


Note: Publisher's Description of Rabbi Joshua Trachtenberg's First Book, "Jewish Magic & Superstition" (1939) 

Jewish Magic and Superstition is a masterful and utterly fascinating exploration of religious forms that have all but disappeared yet persist in the imagination. The volume begins with legends of Jewish sorcery and proceeds to discuss beliefs about the evil eye, spirits of the dead, powers of good, the famous legend of the golem, procedures for casting spells, the use of gems and amulets, how to battle spirits, the ritual of circumcision, herbal folk remedies, fortune telling, astrology, and the interpretation of dreams. First published more than sixty years ago, Trachtenberg's study remains the foundational scholarship on magical practices in the Jewish world and offers an understanding of folk beliefs and practices that expressed most eloquently the everyday religion of the Jewish people.

2) When Israel is Mighty: Ex-Yeshiva student Yossi Gurwitz explains what we can expect when Talmudic Jews gain total ascendency: ["According to Judaism], they are idolaters, and you have to kill them."

Transcript of interview with Yossi Gurwitz, (courtesy of Ken Adachi):

"Judaism as a religion has been frozen in time for the last 1800 years. Generally speaking, Rabbinical Judaism, as it appers in the Talmud - unlike what is generally taught in secular schools - the source of Judaism is not the Bible. The source of Judaism is the Talmud...

Okay, let's get this exactly right: it defines only Jews who believe in the religion are men - as full humans. And everyone else is some level of 'other', that must be pushed aside or, in extreme cases, destroyed.

But if you kill a non-Jew then you're guilty, but there is no penalty. God will punish you. And that is - how shall I put it? - a bit problematic. When you say something is a crime, but there's no punishment for committing it, then it's not really a crime. That's the Talmud. 

The worst case, in my opinion, is the case of Maimonides, who decrees...that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a 3-year old girl. That age of consent is - problematic. And second of all, he decrees that if a Jew rapes a three-year-old non-Jewish girl, then she must be executed. Her, not him - because she tempted him to sin. And for this reason, you have to treat her like an animal that puts obstacles in a person's way. And he quotes some verse about a bull or something like that. And the rabbis know that these parts of the religion that are misanthropic, that are discriminatory to non-Jews, pose a problem for them. Because if they try to implement them - there are some rules that are very unpleasant, like that three-year-old-girl we were just talking about - if they try to implement them, there will be a pogrom.

So to avoid that situation, the Talmud defines two different states of reality. There's one called "Darkei Shalom" [Peaceful Ways]. In other words, "This is the actual religious law, this is how you are supposed to act." "However, since it would cause a huge mess, and people will die. So due to 'peaceful ways', you don't act that way." Now, until what point does the "peaceful ways" rule still apply? Just as long as the other situation does not exist, which is "When Israel is Mighty". That's when there is a Jewish regime. It is independent, and it is merciless, it can do what it likes. Under those circumstances - it's all over, you go back to the letter of the law.

No more "peaceful ways", no more nothing. Now when you think about Jewish history, lots of people talk about the Hasmonean Wars which was pretty much one of the only times that Jews wielded weapons and they think about what the Hasmoneans did to the Hellenized Jews [who assimilated Greek culture]. Which was to make them extinct, to destroy them. A small genocide. And I remind people of this frequently, every time Hanukah rolls around. But they didn't stop there.

They embarked on campaigns of looting and conquest and at the beginning, during their first 20 years, wherever they arrived, they would destroy the local temples. It was prohibited for a place that was under Jewish rule to have a pagan temple. That's what we're talking about. They also forced the Edomites to convert to Judaism on pain of death. It was a forced conversion. Something we learn the [Spanish] Inquisition did later on. They took people and told them: ;"Either you're dead, or you're converting to Judaism". And things only got worse from there.

Now, when religious zionists look at reality, they say: "We've got a state. We've got weapons. We've got a Jewish army. This hasn't happened for 2, 000 years." "What this means is that God wants us to bring about the Messiah, that God wants us to build the Temple." 

In other words, the only difference between the time of Maimonides - he died in 1204 - and the time of the Messiah, is who is subordinate to whom. Are the Jews subordinate to "kingdoms", to other nations? Or can they subordinate other nations? And that is how Maimonides begins his Book of Kings. He explains what the rules are for a king, what a king can do. It emerges from the belief that, yes, there can be a king. You don't have to first have a temple. You don't need God to come down from the sky and point at someone and say, "That's the Messiah". You can have a king, and if he is victorious, then he'll also be the Messiah. And then you look at what religious zionists are doing about this. They want a Messiah. They want him now.

There must be cleansing. Religious law prohibits contact with non-Jews. Of course, the Kosher laws prohibit you from eating with them. Other laws forbid you from treating them fairly. You are forbidden to return a lost item to a non-Jew - except in order to "keep the peace". There is no prohibition on stealing from a non-Jew - except in order to "keep the peace". You can';t say "hello" to them - unless there is no alternative. And so on and so forth.

There are all kinds of prohibitions that are entirely psychotic that are based on a religion of vengeance. Religious zionists have a serious problem with the fact that there are any non-Jews here. The Land of Israel is supposed to be only for Jews. So, ironically, they would manage to get along with the Muslims more or less if we weren't involved in a military conflict with them. Because according to Judaism, Muslims are not idolaters. Muslims believe in one God. They don't have idols, they don't have statues, they don't have anything like that. So ironically, during the Medieval Era, Jews got along better with Muslims than with Christians. But what can you do?

We conquered a territory populated mainly by Muslims. and the Muslims are fighting us - so those defenses fall away. And look, now they are starting to talk about genocide. You have the [book] "Torah Hamelech" [King's Torah]. which tells you that you can kill children if there is a reason to believe that one day they could cause harm. Now, if you killed someone's entire family and left only him alive, he will indeed have a reason to cause harm. If you stole his lands, turned him into a refugee, tossed him to Jordan or Lebanon - he will indeed have a reason to cause harm. Many people said that the book's arguments are not sound according to religious law, and so on and so forth, but no one really tackled it head-on. And it's no wonder that it became a best seller. Because in general, what religious zionists actually want is for the Land of Israel to be for Jews only.

Now the situation for the Christians, on the other hand, will be really bad. [According to Judaism], they are idolaters, and you have to kill them even if they do not resist Jewish rule. In Jerusalem, religious seminary students have a despicable habit: they urinate or defecate on churches. If you go there and talk to the church staff, you'll hear it from every church. Spitting on clergymen on the street is something that happens regularly. If the priest has the gall to hit the person back, to slap him or something similar, then he is deported quietly. They cancel his residence permit in the country. If you want to justify a pogrom, all you have to do is say the words "missionary threat".

And from that perspective, Christianity, which is the historical arch enemy of Judaism is going to get a serious beating once the religious zionists are in power. The Christian Fundamentalists who send them money apparently don't understand what they're dealing with. But you know, it's really a case of "a pox on both your houses". 

End of transcript


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for " Judaism: Black Magic, Sorcery, Pedophilia & Genocide "

Tom K said (November 13, 2015):

This article is packed with the typical (Yeshiva) truth-lie mix to mislead and confuse. Let’s clarify/ demystify a few points …

Gurwitz is trying to lump Muslims and Jews together while singling out Christians for murder! This is cheap fear porn! The truth is: this is a Judaic ploy to impede the rising orthodox Christian-Muslim alliance that will be the nemesis of Judaic Supremacy [and yes, no one will be able to stop this prophesized alliance]! Thus, his talk contains elements that cleverly aid the ongoing Talmudic attempts to hijack/ I.D.-theft of Islam. ... Jews got along well with Muslims way back then because of the MERCY inherent to true Islam, and because those were very different Jews, unlike today's demons/ impostors.]

Finally, note how the ARROGANT Jews would prostrate to devils/demons, and attempt to transfer their sins to chickens … but NEVER repent to the One True God! [That’s why they were Cursed in the first place!] … We recently explored at how Zio-Nazism and Zio-Jewry may be joined at the hip. It’s no coincidence that this article attempts to avert all blame upon the religious Jew alone. It would be no less than the scope of an entire book to reveal how the Vatican’s occult/satanic/voodoo repertoire may be far more monstrous than this singled-out Jew with his chicken! [After all, the Vatican bank = Rothschild bank].

Therein, the Jew-vs.-Christian dichotomy may just be another false propaganda/ ruse. The truest of Christians have been systematically/ incrementally killed off ALREADY, since 320 AD and till WWII. Just like the "European-Jew" is a hoax/ oxymoron, so may well be the "European/White-Christian" or the "Turkic/Levant/Persian/Pale-skinned Muslim" identities! ... Why? ... Because the AUTHENTIC/ original Judaism, Christianity and Islam ... were all SEMITIC in nature ... and Moses, Jesus and Mohammad were all Semites. Duh!

Ron said (November 12, 2015):

Greg noted in his comment to the Anger Management article that : [

The trick the social justice warriors (communists/Marxists) use is to call you a misogynist if you criticize the Violence Against Women Act. ] It's even worse than that. On last Sunday's talk panel on The National on the CBC [ which is always agonizing to watch but quite revealing of what the elite believe and want to foist onto the public ] that bizarre robotic looking propagandist Adam Goldenberg outright stated that the opposite of feminism "is misogyny"!

I have to laugh because then by using his OWN logic - opposition to masculinism [ a term the other "male" panelist was wary of even using! on a discussion about men's rights! ] must then be misandry! I just love the irony of how he made the point of his opponents while trying to make a craven point he thought was bolstering his side of the argument. Though it was the first time I ever saw the panel get so animated as Goldenberg was overreaching in his vicious anti man propaganda to the point where the other "male" panelist was quite roused in opposition to Goldenberg's totalitarian position.

A said (November 12, 2015):

Bloody powerful article!

Africans here are culturally steeped in that type of voodoo, & circumcision.

Maimonides: The Jewish Greek. Maimou in modern Greek is a monkey.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at