Direct Link to Latest News


Obama Preaches Tolerance While Inciting Hatred

December 15, 2015

obama-islam.jpegObama Doublespeak; What's his Game?

Obama funds ISIS and blames false flags on "radical Islam" while defending Islam at the same time? 

(Disclaimer: Radical Islamic terror is a CIA-MI 6- Mossad creation. I disagree with Mathew B about Islam and don't think polygamy, which I am against, disqualifies Mohammed. Nevertheless, Mathew raises an important question.  What is Obama's, (i.e. the Masonic Jewish) game? They want to create an imaginary threat, while at the same time divide Americans by making some react fearfully while making others condemn this reaction as "intolerant." It's a mind game to sow division and confusion.)

by Mathew B

Obama and the mainstream media
ALREADY play a masterful game of 'double speak' when it comes to Islam. They are very careful to add 'radical' in front of terrorist every time the word is mentioned, to ensure the masses don't associate terrorism with the real Muslim faith, lulling us into a continued sense of complacency toward the Muslim religion and Muslim immigration as a whole.

Remember, we're talking about a religious and political ideology here, NOT a racial ethnicity.

This doublespeak trick is part of the game of divide and conquer, from the top down. Bring the Muslims in and deliberately stir them up. Then use the fires caused to justify additional totalitarian laws for our 'safety', whether legitimate attacks or false flags, is irrelevant, while continuing to praise and defend the 'true' Islamic faith.

Again, I'm aware of the role the Jews and Masons are playing in this at the highest levels. But I also know Islam is a radical religion in and of itself. Yes, there are 'sects' of Islam that have excluded the radical elements of their faith based on the intuition of the human soul, and do practice their faith more like Christians than Muslims. But the fact remains that they've excluded these radical elements in spite of their faith, not because of it. 

One example, Muhammed was a polygamist and Islam justifies polygamy. On this basis alone we can see Islam is a false religion. Christ was clear in the NT scriptures, one man and one woman. He truly, traditional Catholicism truly, gives men and women equal respect, in complimentary roles. For Muhammed and Islam to justify polygamy is to take a major step 'backwards'.

Study the traditional Catholic dogmas, as I'm sure you already have, and you'll find no such moral conflicts in its theology, not one. Therefore when a member of the clergy or faith acts contrary to its dogmas, the faith itself can't be blamed, as it can in Islam.

I have taken up quite a bit of your time today Henry, so I won't include a youtube clip of Obama 'bashing' Christians. I'll simply show you one where he's praising Islam: (less than 10 minutes)

Yes, a couple of bits and pieces probably are taken out of context there. But the overall theme that Obama praises Islam and does no such thing for Christendom is established beyond doubt. Again, a quick youtube search will bring up video examples of Obama openly mocking Christianity including Christ and the gospels, if you'd like to see them.

I'm sure you're also aware that Christians are being brutally persecuted all around the world, especially in Islamic nations, but not limited to Islamic nations. It's not unusual for China to persecute Christians for example. And sadly, the West itself is rapidly heading in that same direction, because we have become lovers of lies e.g. sodomy is good, and haters of truth e.g. chastity is a virtue.

Anyway, here is CNN defending Islam (and there are many more such clips online): (less than 10 minutes)


First Comment from Dan:
Who can find any fault in this essays' title? "Obama Preaches Tolerance While Inciting Hatred"
That is exactly what he does.  That should be his place in history - no President since Lincoln has wrought more division and kindled more fear and loathing of our neighbors than Obama Husein Iscariot.

Typically he and media in concert have derailed the public focus on his outrageous plan to import hundreds of thousands of unknown entities displaced by his bombs and mercenaries directly into the heart of America.
That's what this debate over 'religious tolerance' is about.  But that's a distraction from the real situation.
Obama is presiding an undeclared war and radicalization of all those people.

Suddenly our government wants to import refugees from war zones which that same government has created.  Though it is obvious that we are responsible for the ruination of those people's lives, since when has ours or any government imported refugees from 'enemy' nations during a war.    When the Washington and London firebombed Dresden on February 13, 1945, did Roosevelt insist on bringing the German civilian survivors of Allied bombing to distribute all over the United States?

The answer is no, he didn't.  As a matter of fact naturalized Japanese-American citizens were incarcerated in American concentration camps for the duration of WWII.  The reason for these policies is obvious: during wartime anyone from 'enemy' countries is a potential saboteur, terrorist, and spy.

While Obama and media pluck our heart strings for their policy of deliberately importing potential terrorists, Obama just announced he's about to issue an Executive Order that will ban guns for anyone on any Government agency 'watch list'.  He's only waiting to accrue the support of the usual governors, to enact the same order at the state level.  Don't you see?  The more chaos and violence that tyrants can bring down upon us the more power they gain over us.

We may not like to hear these things but these are just the basic facts of WAR.  Americans born after 1940 have no recollection of how things worked when the US and UK used to declare our wars.   If you want to help the Syrian refugees - AS I DO - go after your god damn treasonous moles who are running our government and demand a total withdrawal of American and NATO de facto destabilization of the Middle East.

Tony B weighs in on toleration of evil:

There is hardly a greater sin than the toleration of evil.  It allows the destruction of all that is good simply because it "should be tolerated" without anyone bothering to offer a reason as to why evil should be tolerated.  This is the modern mantra and it comes straight from hell as there are just too many notices from God that the Devil is now loose on earth, influencing most everyone. 

It would be so wonderful to hear someone simply ask the question as to why evil, like good, should be tolerated simply because it exists.  It shows that people today know nothing of the real world and real history.  People are sadly ignorant and not willing to think.  About much of anything.  Propagandists such as Obama depend on it.  Thus the allowance of civilization destroying abortion, so-called "same sex marriage," "family courts," etc., ad nauseum. (sp?)

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Obama Preaches Tolerance While Inciting Hatred"

Christopher G said (December 16, 2015):

Zakah1's videos on youtube clears up all these questions.

WWF is full of predictive programming with the twin towers and Albert Pike's "Christianity" vs "Islam".
satan is cleverly cancelling out the 2 religions he hates the most as dupes keep getting duped.
Both religions really the same at the core. Mohammad spoke highly of Christ in the Quran
and his first wife was a christian, then later married a Jewess but that doesn't seem to matter to the dupes.

All attention diverted from the real culprits - the Rothschilds & 300, giggling while sipping wine on bordeaux vinyards in France as heartbroken Syrians refugees are scapegoated.

Why can't people get it through their thick skulls, POLITICS IS ALL THEATRE and satanists are highly organized long term planners with contingency plans!? If plan "A" fails then they go with "B".

Plan "A" with Obama was to have him a popular hero ushering in NWO, if that didn't work plan "B" is to make him a villain pretending to support Islam. Obama deserves an Oscar for his performance.

If you want to be political science expert, stop watching the news and start watching wrestling & soaps.

Mohammad said not to break into sects 3x in the Quran. [6:159] [30:32] [42:14]

Shiite fake Islam sect was created by Jewish satanist Abdulla Ibn Sabbah, so it makes sense why Jewish shills like Matt Stone claim to be Shiite.

Christ made it clear He didn't come to negate [Moses] law or prophets(Matt5:17-19).

The Greco-Roman law of one man can only marry one woman has absolutely nothing to do with the Bible or Judaism or nature for that matter.

I notice how socially engineered "supposed" christians have on their blinders about the Jewish Prophets as they
slander Mohammad.

Moses's first wife was an Ethiopian princess then he went with a Median woman. The Most High was NOT furious
at King David for having 99 wives, but was furious at David for stealing Uriah's wife and indirectly murdering him.
I have yet to find any defenders of Talmudic blasphemers of Christ - "christian zionists", slander David or Moses as not being prophets.

Rich men with booty get lots of booty. You don't have to like it, that's just the way it is.

MS said (December 16, 2015):

I think Christians and Muslims should recognize that the beast system is targeting both faiths. Let's unite efforts and not get caught up in competition. Many Old Testament figures had multiple wives, including Prophets Solomon, Isaac, and Jacob, but most notably the patriarch, Prophet Abraham who fathered Ismail and Isaac from two wives, a polygamous marriage sanctified by God. In Christianity, the matter of polygamy is subject to debate and has not achieved consensus. Jesus says in the New Testament that he has come not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it. Mosaic law, which Prophet Jesus followed, permits polygamy; the Quran provides conditions and limits for it.

Polygamy in the Quran is permitted as a measure of last resort, with clear warnings and conditions, that one should not have additional wives out of desire, but rather motivated by the need to protect orphans, widows, and the wellbeing of women who cannot otherwise find a husband, in order to maintain virtue and social order. The Quran warns that each wife must be treated with equal justice, further stating that man would not be able to deal with multiple wives equally, and as a consequence strongly urges that a man should marry only one wife. However, divine law accommodates different social conditions, including those of duress like infertility, famine and war. After WW2, when Germany was faced with an untenable male to female ratio due to male deaths, polygamy was determined to be a viable and socially effective way to deal with the problem. We will face the same situation after WW3.

The author Mathew B. says "But I also know Islam is a radical religion in and of itself." How about citing examples? A commenter, Chestsy states that the Quran has a moral double standard regarding those outside its faith, similar to the Talmud. Really? Do tell. Peace.

John said (December 16, 2015):

Obama has been completely brain washed by his handler. Bet he fears the NSA or another government agency will discredit his legacy as POTUS or file impeachment charges against him for not comply with the orders handed to him. No one can deny his devotion for Islam and total disregard for Christian values. Muslim people do not hate western values or our freedoms if anything they hate us for our foreign policies which destabilized the Middle East for decades. The double speak comes when everything is given to Israel meanwhile US hegemony back-stabbed the ME especially Christians and the Muslim communities around the globe. The phoney war on terror is to implement totalitarianism in the US in the process strip due process our freedoms, civil liberties, and weapons.

James C said (December 16, 2015):

In the article, "Obama Preaches Tolerance While Inciting Hatred," Mathew B wrote: "One example, Muhammed was a polygamist and Islam justifies polygamy. On this basis alone we can see Islam is a false religion. Christ was clear in the NT scriptures, one man and one woman."

Concerning the biblical position on polygamy, Mathew B is incorrect. Islam is not a false religion because it permits polygamy. Neither does the Bible, either Old or New Testaments, prohibit polygamy. Quite the contrary. For example, Exodus 21:10 clearly permitted polygamy. Likewise, king David, a man after God's own heart (Acts 13:22), had at least eight, possibly thirteen wives. Jehovah Himself, the God of the Old Testament, had two wives (Ezekiel 23:4). Isaiah 4:1 tells us that in the millennium "seven women shall take hold of one man." The New Testament prohibition of polygamy only applied to bishops and deacons (see 1 Timothy 3:2; 3:12).

Isaiah 4:1 indicates that wives have a legal right to waive their right of financial support from their husbands: "We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach."

In light of Isaiah 4:1, I've heard it said that both Muhammed and George Washington made their money the old fashioned way: they married it.

Mike said (December 16, 2015):


Just thought that it might be relevant to actually include the entire context for the Obama quote at the top of the article:

"It is time to leave the call of violence and the politics of division behind. On so many issues, we face a choice between the promise of the future, or the prisons of the past. And we cannot afford to get it wrong. We must seize this moment. And America stands ready to work with all who are willing to embrace a better future.

The future must not belong to those who target Coptic Christians in Egypt -- it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted, "Muslims, Christians, we are one." The future must not belong to those who bully women -- it must be shaped by girls who go to school, and those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their dreams just like our sons.

The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country's resources -- it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs, the workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all people. Those are the women and men that America stands with; theirs is the vision we will support.

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.

Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims and Shiite pilgrims. It's time to heed the words of Gandhi: "Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit." Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, that's the vision we will support."

I'm not a fan of Obama, I did not vote for him, and it's been obvious since 2007 that he is a tool of the corporate elite. However, taking things he says out of context doesn't help expose the truth about him (not to mention failing to point out the supreme irony of him saying, "The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country's resources"......the very people he works for). As you can see above, he is speaking out for Christians here as well as Muslims (not American Christians, but that wasn't the topic at hand anyway). I just get frustrated when people feel they need to grasp at such out of context quotes to demonize someone, when there is plenty of real evidence to be found that Obama is just a puppet of the elites who want to enslave us all.


Good point Mike, but the fact remains his Administration supports ISIS and false flag mass shootings which incite hatred against Islam while at the same time preaching tolerance. It's a mind game. -henry

Tom A said (December 15, 2015):

your guest writer seems to be confused about islam the same way the tv represents islam. there is no radical, moderate in islam. you are not given a choice to be a certain way. you either follow the teaching of God or you don't. polygamy was a way that stopped adultery and there were many widows who lost husband's and couldn't take care without a man. it wasn't about sex like your guest Mathew B. who probably thinks that.

Lastly, Christians and muslims have been living in peace for quite some time until recently all hell broke loose but one good point is the Christians and Muslims been living side by side in Palestine did they ever kill each other like Mathew claims?

Chestsy said (December 15, 2015):

This doublespeak concerning Islam goes back to Bushco if not before. After 911 it was drummed into every newscast that "Islam is a religion of peace" so that you wanted to vomit.

Anyway, our own govt. underwrote the militancy of Islam:
I think the reason for both things above is to create a backlash in the American people (with the "free" press carrying out the strategy], and unfortunately we've taken the bait. All to divide and conquer and create animosity and a sense of powerlessness.

We really are the great satan under such leadership. And the fact that all things gay are holy serves the plan even more.

The one thing I haven't seen explicitly mentioned anywhere is that the Koran mimics the Talmud. If the Talmud says it's ok to lie, cheat, etc. to the goyim, the Koran says the same thing regarding the infidel. Different sets of morality vis a vis what is meant by "neighbor." Mathew B. is correct: there are no such contradictions in Christianity.

I learned in school that Islam was a made-up religion influenced by Christianity and Judaism. Unfortunately, most Jews place higher authority on the Talmud. So we see where this dastardly way of thinking comes from.

I don't know if that letter from Pike to Mazzini is real or not, but it seems to be a pretty good indication of where Judeo-masonry wants to take us. Look to the unseen hand.

p.s. Al Qaeda spokesman Adam Gadahn was Jewish (born Adam Perlman) and Isis leader Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi is too (born Simon Elliott). Both Mossad agents. It doesn't get dumber (and plainer) than this!

Below are two websites that back up what I said regarding Muslim/Jewish dealings with infidels/goyim (respectively) as seen in the Koran/Talmud:

The fact that this is questioned shows the extent to which the press covers up for the Talmud.

I am happy to be able to elaborate on this point b/c I forgot to say that Jews typically regard the Talmud to a higher degree than they do Scripture. In fact, when they mention the Torah it is assumed it is looked at through the lens of the Talmud.

Check out what Jesus had to say about this in the opening verses of Mark 7.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at