Direct Link to Latest News


Sex - A Retro View

October 18, 2016


Illuminati social engineers have convinced 
young women they don't want the thing 
they most want: a man's permanent love. 

Ideally, a woman should never have sex
with a man who doesn't love her.

by Henry Makow Ph.D. 

At age 66, I am as retro as a clothesline; but I must say it, my parent's generation had it right. 

When I was young in the 1950's and 60's, smart women did not have sex with men who didn't love them. Men had to
convince women they did by courtship. This process was crowned with a proposal of marriage. Men dedicated themselves to their wives, and showed it by "making love" to them, in bed and out. 

Illuminati social engineers have convinced young women they don't want the thing they most want: married love. 

To a woman, a man's love is like sunshine to a flower. Women need love as urgently as men need sex. So to give sex and receive nothing in return is not empowering at all. It is cheating yourself. Yes, women need sex too, in the context of a man's love. 

Society in general, and women in particular, have been sold a bill of goods. "Social change" is not progress at all. It's a mask for
a deliberate process of social degradation. 


The intimacy that can develop between a married man and woman is one of the finest things life has to offer. It's what both women and men actually crave, not just physical sex. 

But the Illuminati have disparaged marriage and love in their media, trampled on it, never showing it in a true positive light. This is because the fish rots from the head down. The Illuminati are a satanic cult that controls and exploits society by corrupting and degrading people. They are deliberately sabotaging marriage and family by waging psychological war on heterosexuals. 

download (57).jpeg
(left, Illuminati role model, Miley Cyrus) 

What I'm saying is that, ideally, a woman should never have sex with a man who doesn't love her. 

As you know, nowadays, it's socially acceptable to hook up with practical strangers. This is what homosexuals usually do.
Sex is a cheap facsimile of the real thing - making love. They think that if they go through the physical motions often enough, somehow the "love" part will develop.

Young women have been taught that promiscuity is "empowering" when in fact it is debilitating and humiliating. They are being used and at some level they know it. 


Because of their brainwashing, most young women today sell themselves on the basis of physical appearance alone, like prostitutes. Feminine charm has gone the way of the dodo bird. Yet female charm and personality are what is really sexy. The myriad qualities of womanliness and femininity are far sexier than a trim body and pretty face.  Bodies are a dime a dozen. Souls, real people, are practically obsolete. 

See what has happened? We've all been dehumanized by sex. This is not an accident. 

When women demanded to be loved, they also had to be loveable. They had to be special, reflected in their character, style and ability. Now they think their physical appearance is enough. Sex appeal requires much more. It requires we be better, more attractive human beings. 

So I'm not saying you have to wait until marriage, although that is admirable. Sex then really means something.  

But sex should always be an expression of love. 

Women (and men) : Don't settle for less! 

It's dehumanizing. Sex should make us more human, not less.

Related - Having Sex is not Making Love 
------------ Sexual Depravity is the Hallmark of Satanic Possession

------------------ Why Women Aren't Getting Loved 

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Sex - A Retro View"

Connie said (October 19, 2016):

In the surprising circumstance that a woman marries, the other thing she will be talked out of is having children. Why? Because "the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world."

Tony B said (October 18, 2016):

I AM saying wait for marriage. Wish my kids' mother and I had waited. Maybe we would have stayed together or maybe we would have decided we were wrong for each other and never married in the first place.

Sid said (October 18, 2016):

I like today's article. This is what my mom taught me growing up. But all the women of my generation are totally duped by pop culture into thinking hooking up is empowering. Like you said, they also know they are being used. Do they enjoy this on some depraved level or are they just brainwashed?

Al Thompson said (October 18, 2016):

I think it is better to just wait to have sex until marriage. There's really no point in having sex if it is going to be used as a recreational activity. Even if there is "love", without the marriage, it is still fornication which always produces bad results.

Instead of having a big wedding, some people might want to simply declare their marriage to their family and friends. This way, they can start on their journey through life with a solid foundation of marriage. I think this is the best way for young people to get started. Sex outside of marriage always has a bad result.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at