Direct Link to Latest News

 

Does Isaiah Explain the New World Order?

August 11, 2017

537px-Isaiah_Bible_Card.jpg


"How can Christians not notice the hatred of non-Jews implicit in 
Isaiah 60: 3-12?" 
I asked in a tweet. "I fell into that trap," Jerry replied. "
Christians no longer view themselves as Gentiles, they want to/do believe that they are now the "chosen": Zionism."  

What do you think?  Isaiah's supremacist Jewish vision has been expanded to include all Satanists (Cabalists, Freemasons) and is responsible for Communism & the NWO. 

How can Christians ignore the program for world conquest and enslavement outlined in Isaiah? Why can't they see that Isaiah is not the "word of God" and, as far as religious Zionists are concerned, goyim are not part of the Covenant, not even human
Is the ugly truth hiding in plain view? Can we conflate Talmudic Judaism, Satanism, Communism and the NWO? I believe we can.


Isaiah 60: 3-12 
'The Gentiles shall come to your light,
And their kings to the brightness of your rising...
You shall drink the milk of the Gentiles,
And draw milk from the breasts of their kings.
Strangers shall stand and feed your flocks,
And the sons of the foreigner shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers.
You shall be named the priests of the Lord and the Gentiles shall call you the servants of God.
You shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, and in their glory you shall boast as they surrender unto you their gold and incense...
The children of those who afflicted you
Shall come bowing down to you,
And all those who despised you shall fall prostrate at the soles of your feet,
The sons of foreigners shall build up your walls,
And their kings shall minister to you, as your gates remain open, day and night,
So that men may bring to you the wealth of the Gentiles,
And their kings led in humble procession before you,
For the nation which will not serve you shall perish, it shall be utterly destroyed."


Mark Glen, who first highlighted this quoteAs we point out here on a regular basis, Judaism and the mindset it inevitably produces--religious, political, cultural, etc--is not 'inclusive', 'tolerant' or accepting of other views other than its own. As such, its adherents engage regularly in the business of shutting down any and all other viewpoints that do not contribute to the agenda which Judea, Inc has charted for itself, and whether it is violence/threats of violence, screeching, getting someone fired from their place of employment, computer hacking or whether it is the more subtle mechanism of steering the narrative in a more clever and cunning manner, the MO is/has been/always will be the same.

Lynda----I write to you about the prophet Isaiah because you have many readers who do not read any kind of hate into Isaiah chapters 60 and 61.

The Christian reading of Isaiah 61 is that the word of the prophet is addressed to all humanity held in thrall by the succession of imperial powers proceeding out of Babylon. [The Book of Daniel gives this succession of Beast empires; the Apoc gives the close-up of the final one: the Empire of the City ] This imperium and its succession is ultimately ruled by Lucifer: 'the genius' of The Protocols and 'our god' according to many sources. And in the NT we meet the Archangel himself as 'the Satan' who offers the dominion to Jesus Christ. All the glory of all the kingdoms of this aion shown in a moment of time "All these I will give to thee, the glory of them and the authority to rule them, for such is given to me, if thou wilt fall down and worship me" Luke 4:6; Matt 4:8

This episode immediately precedes the teaching and prophetic ministry of Jesus. After the ultimate refusal, he begins to teach in the synagogues of Galilee. And the scroll of Isaiah beginning at 61:1 is the formal opening of the Divine offensive.  Luke 4:14-19. Just as the hierarchs have a plan, so to does the Divine intervention against Satanic rule on behalf of the human race. And in that plan, there is order, hierarchy and precedence: first to the people of the Abrahamic, Mosaic and Abrahamic covenants, the Circumcision and then to the Gentile nations.

The Covenants were not given as a racial supremacy. They were given for the formation of a people who were to be the unique, genealogical, cultural and spiritual vessel of the Divine intervention in his incarnation, historical life, redemptive suffering and death, resurrection. Thus the founding of the new race in himself as the last Adam/the second Man - the God/man race which is still aborning. Against the Luciferian claim, this race now claims the Adamic dominion in "your Redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob" Isaiah 60:16. And that race has now proclaimed his Evangel to all nations. By now we should all know how that went. It is always entertaining to hear the architects of the Bolshevik Revolution reciting their litanies of the sins of the Church.

So yes, in this sense, the words of the prophet Isaiah addressed to Israel in 60 and 61 has been fulfilled and will be consummated in the best of all possible ways - for those who made the New Covenant and indeed laid its foundation and those who were 'grafted' in. Without exception the entire White race in its nations was at one time in history baptized into that Covenant and founded its social order upon the Church. Nations which were not baptized as nations had their social order modified to the good by the presence of the Church among their peoples.

Scott Lively- Isaiah 60 isn't a description of Judaism, unless Judaism is defined as Yahweh Worship. It describes the Millennial Kingdom following the reunification of the two houses, and glimpses beyond that to spiritual Heaven v. 19-20.

Terminology is essential to this discussion. "Judaism" (as it is used by most Christians) means the Yahweh worship seen in the Bible, from as far back as the time of Seth in Genesis through the New Testament. It is associated with the House of Judah because it remained the religion of the Jews (Judeans) after the split of the David's United Kingdom into the Kingdom of Judah and Kingdom of Israel. The House and Kingdom of Israel created a Judaism-based but false new religion and never returned to the original form of Yahweh worship, so Yahweh worship -- as it explicated by Moses -- was related exclusively to the House of Judah from the time of that split. 

After the expulsion of the Jews from the Holy Land by the Romans in 135AD, Babylon became the home of Judaism where the Talmud arose first as a supplement to and then (for some) a supplanter of the Torah.

So, I don't think it's possible to have a meaningful discussion about "Judaism" without clearly distinguishing it from Talmudism and without defining its relationship to Yahweh worship.

--

Related-
When Israel is Mighty  (start at 2.28 Jewish scholar explains that goyim are not kosher.)

Xenophobic Jewish Doctrine Staring us in the Face for Centuries 

Goyim are animals - The Talmudic NWO 


First Comment by Mary


We Goyim are not invited to the party as wait staff!  We who have been chosen from the foundation of the earth for salvation in Christ have become God's own sons and daughters and joint-heirs with His Son, the Christ, through the New Birth and The Atonement.  There are no lesser brethren!  We are all His Children!  Ephesians Chapter Two explains the equality that Gentiles have with Jews!  "Now, therefore, ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow-citizens of the household of God."    

One can't take one scripture out of context and say that it explains everything.  2 Timothy 3:16-17:  "ALL scripture is inspired by God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be perfect, furnished unto all good works."   The Scriptures all work TOGETHER to present truth.  

God through Paul clearly says this in the New Testament.  Galatians 3:28-29.  "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female, for we are all one in Christ."  He places us all in ONE BODY of which He is the head, and He isn't going to go about and cut off and discard parts of His own body, now, is He?   

The Word of God clearly states that Father Abraham was NOT a Jew.  He was from Ur of the Chaldees, a Syrian.  So was Sarai, his wife.  The promise of the Lamb of God was given to Abraham long before the law.  Salvation is to ALL MEN everywhere, and Abraham became the father of many nations because of his Seed, the Christ, for God is now calling men and women and children out of every nation under the sun to be His Own, in Christ:  these, then are the true elect, the true chosen people of God, of which the natural children of Abraham were only a one time natural type, back in the days of the types and shadows.  But, as Paul states in Romans, the Jews were given the oracles and the law, and the record of all things, as Moses gave us the history of creation, in the Book of Genesis.  There was a lot of advantage to being an OBEDIENT Jew, back in the day.  A disobedient one, not so much, because then they were subjected to God's wrath.   

Perhaps sucking the breast of kings has another meaning--a spiritual one?  What is in one's breast? One's spirit!  Perhaps one learns of God by hearing and imbibing the spirit of those who already know the Lord!  One could say that of the prophets!  We take in their words, but their hearts and minds were given over to the Lord and the moving of His Spirit through theirs.  Salvation is, after all, a SPIRITUAL thing and needs to be discerned spiritually.  

The carnal or natural mind cannot grasp the things of God for they are spiritually discerned.  Maybe that passage in Isaiah that you so decry is only describing the time that the Gentiles bring the Jews back to Christ, and to their God, when the fullness of the Gentiles have come in, and show mercy on the Jews, by showing them the love, great grace, great truth, and great mercy of their God, from Whom they've been estranged these many generations.  



Scruples, the game of moral dilemmas




Comments for "Does Isaiah Explain the New World Order? "

Daniel W said (August 13, 2017):

I don't claim to be a Biblical scholar but those who twist the scriptures to suit their theology are the ones who are causing such strife in this world, led by the Zionist Communists who only thrive on creating division since they hate the True Messiah. When Christ stood up and read from that passage of scripture it was His confirmation of the fulfillment of the promise made by God of the seed of a woman to be the savior of the world.


The seed of a woman not of a MAN. It means He Christ was born of a woman having been overshadowed by the Spirit Of God and therefore Christ did not inherit a sin nature. He was Yahweh Himself manifest in The Flesh in human form-a miracle of miracles. See 1 Timothy 3:16. I could go into more detail but I shall leave it there.

Go well and know that whatever happens salvation is only through Jesus Christ and whatever the Satanists throw at us as believers they CANNOT destroy the SOUL of Christians as at the time of salvation we are given a divine soul which is eternal. Killing the body has no consequence for those who have The Spirit of God through Christ in them.


E said (August 13, 2017):

You have already criticized here Protestantism as a leading undermining comparable to the action of Freemasonry. One of the main characteristics of Protestantism is "free examination", that is to say the alleged legitimacy to every Protestant to interpret the Bible according to their own views, and practice self-contradictory to define any coherent doctrine: Simple logic. It's very destructive. Okay, it's just what you do every time you talk about the Bible.
I tell you that for the Catholic religion (the real, not false Francisco and Vatican II), the "next source" of faith (ie to the faithful) is NOT the Bible, but the Magisterium of the Church. The Bible, as the Tradition are just the "distant source" of the faith, whose interpretation, reserved for accredited theologians must be validated and published by the Pope (the latest being Pie XII). You will never find in the Catechism of Trent or those of St. Pius X, although it may seem clear Malformed layman's your interpretation of the passage from Isaiah. TA is for the Church, a delicate handling of paper work reserved for "professionals" enlightened by the Holy Spirit. Luther knew very well what he was preaching the "free inquiry".

I write this not to convert you (!), But simply to correct a serious mistake.
In the hope that my message reaches you.


Peter said (August 13, 2017):

There is a much bigger picture than "the Jews" no matter how we define Judaism, and I am always aware to apply the same tar and feathers to other mobs (or societies if you prefer).

Tupper Saussy's Rulers of Evil is now taking me through the Vatican conspiracy and there is plenty of meat in his sandwich, though I am also looking out for the 'Jews' in any of these stories, and I can take both sides of the debate about the Inquisitions (Spanish or Roman).

The good thing about Jesus (whether Joseph Atwill's Ceasar's Messiah book is correct or not) is that the values in the NT are a couple of grades above the OT, what Jim Stone calls a stone age religion. As for the Roman Church as an institution, Saussy is clear that it was just a Christ/Jesus add on to the status quo, rule by the Romans who Lauren Moret includes in her ancient Iranian bloodline of inbreeders.

Quo Vadis (♫do you know where your going to♫) is what should concern us. Jordan Maxwell tells us that Christ comes from Christos (greek) and the Brahman Kristna, and, yes, I would trust someone Jewish. Brahmanism was an elitist cult too (for better or worse, for just them or all).

Civilisation's role is to nut these problems (sociopaths) out. Moret says the primitive tribes at least could do that much for the most part. One cannot do this in modern systems without freedom of information. Gilad Atzmon defines Jewish power as the power to thwart any discussion of itself (outside inner circles of course). The Church too was intolerant of heretics (and so was Protestanism) , but also a lot of heresy was just anti-Catholic luciferianism, if not the kind of Judaism that comprises half the OT and it's two faced self serving God.


John S said (August 12, 2017):

Read “New History of the Jews” by Eustace Mullins - 1968.
It is free online. papafranciscovideos.com/90051-download-eustace-mullins.html

Eustace Mullins, a historical researcher, explains how the jews destroyed, in order the e
Egyptian Empire
Babylonian Empire
Persian Empire
Greek Empire
Roman Empire.
Jewish control of the Roman Empire is why Emperor Constantine left Rome and went to Constantinople to set up the Byzantine Empire
which manifested over his restriction on jewish circumcision of their slaves.
Experienced destroyers indeed.
The jews always use the same technique.
Along with a host of other things, Mullins refers to the Law of Moses as barbaric and explains how the jewish God of Jehovah is really a different name for Baal.
Mullins was a well informed Christian.


IImran said (August 12, 2017):

I have doubts that the globalists have Judaism as their religion. This seems to be a Millennial prophecy. Yes a caste system will exist as described by Isaiah. Pagans and immortal saints (such as those that will live in Israel and other non-Israelite saints) will be given dominion at that time by Christ:
http://theswordbearer.org/spD027a_soul.html
http://theswordbearer.org/spD016_slavery.html

But we have had good kings in the past...and they had slavery also remember?


Cas said (August 12, 2017):

Reply to Scott Lively


The so called "yahweh" movement or "Hebrew roots movement Fits right in with the noahide movement . This little one was seduced by this cult and only by the Grace of Jesus Christ saw it for what it is , another cult of judaism . Some fleshly cult , whereas Jesus Christ is the Son of the Highest who is a SPIRIT .


Cas said (August 11, 2017):

Reply to Scott Lively


The so called "yahweh" movement or "Hebrew roots movement Fits right in with the noahide movement . This little one was seduced by this cult and only by the Grace of Jesus Christ saw it for what it is , another cult of judaism . Some fleshly cult , whereas Jesus Christ is the Son of the Highest who is a SPIRIT .


Larry C said (August 11, 2017):

This is a great question, Henry. Since Illuminati are motivated by an unfathomable hatred for Christ and Christianity and most so-called Christians are Zionists, it seems logical that if the world rejects Christ then what it gets is the NWO. Let's consider:

And ye (Jews) shall leave your name for a curse unto my chosen: for the Lord God shall slay thee, and call his servants by another name:...For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind. Isaiah 65:15,17 KJV

"For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:" Revelation 22:18 KJV

It's to bad Christians prefer to worship at Jews' feet when Christ would prefer the opposite:

"I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars—I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you." Revelation 3:9 NIV

Why can't they (Christians) see that Isaiah is not the "word of God"? Why can't whoever reads Isaiah keep it in context and see the coming of Christ (Isaiah 53)? Is it to actually promote the Illuminati agenda? Me thinks so.

God has forgotten the Old Covenant, we should do the same thing.


Mary said (August 11, 2017):


Henry, that passage in Isaiah 60 directly relates to Revelation 21...

Please read them in conjunction and see that the passage in Isaiah 60 is referring to the TRUE holy city, New Jerusalem, that comes down from God out of heaven at the end of this age. We are told in this passage in the Book of Revelation that the kings of the earth DO bring their glory and honor into it, that the gates shall not be shut, and that they shall bring the glory and honor of the nations into it.

That is NOT a bad thing! The gentiles have brought their riches into it, too, for they have received of the TRUE RICHES that Christ bid us seek: the new birth, eternal life and knowing Him, the One True God, without which salvation is impossible. The kings of the gentiles come because God made his True Church, HIS TRUE NATION, HIS TRUE ISRAEL, an amalgamation of ALL His True Jews, all those who believe in Christ as Savior and Lord, a nation of kings and priests.

This passage refers to the summation of all things, the new heavens and the new earth, and to Heavenly Jerusalem, a city that is bequeathed to the Gentiles every bit as much as to the Jews, for salvation is and was meant for the whole of mankind, every race of man, but specifically and only to those who are God's Elect, those whom He chose for salvation in Christ out of all the nations under heaven, from before the foundation of the earth, Eph.1:4, for a TRUE JEW is anyone who believes on Christ and has the faith of Abraham, which was a personal relationship with God, and NO MAN CAN COME TO CHRIST EXCEPT THE FATHER DRAW HIM. That is why the church is referred to as The Elect, and The Elect Lady, in the New Testament.

These chosen ones serve the true King of Israel, Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Son of God, Son of David, and the Lamb of God of the Abrahamic Covenant. That is why we who believe on Christ are the True Seed of Abraham, and heirs of the promise, or covenant, that God made with Abraham. The true hope of Israel was the Resurrection, the Atonement, and Eternal Life with God in Christ, not earthly riches, and an earthly life only. The patriarchs sought that city with foundations whose builder and maker was God, HEAVENLY JERUSALEM, as they considered themselves but pilgrims and wayfarers on this earth. We, too, seek this city and the eternal life which Christ has promised to those who believe on Him.

Isaiah 60:19 and 20 are almost perfectly replicated in Revelation 21:23 and 24.


Robert K said (August 11, 2017):

Primitive tribes commonly had their god or gods who supposedly accorded them special favor relative to other groups. In this quotation from Isaiah we hear the archetypal voice of a tribal god.

What wholesome individual wants to have a god who prefers a collectivity without concern for the merits of its constituents? And from what awful depths of insecurity comes an impulse to subjugate one's neighbors as described in the passage cited?

It is, of course, completely incompatible with the message that the Kingdom of God is Within and that one ought to "pray" (hearken to one's conscience) at all times. This "praying", which is essential to our humanity, is what the external world, mainly through the compromises demanded by the employment matrix operated by the Money Power, conditions us not to do.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at