Direct Link to Latest News


Undoing Male Sex Programming

October 1, 2017

(Left,  Naked females look identical yet Western occulture is besotted with them.
 This mental programming degrades men and women to the level of animals.)

If we don't program our minds, the Illuminati will. Sexual desire
is mostly in the mind. If men think of a steak, we salivate.
If we think of sex, we respond accordingly.
But what if men didn't think of sex?

Let Philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer's words below inspire us to try this experiment: Banish all sexual thoughts (and images) for a three-month period. Discover the true meaning of "sexual liberation," which satanists typically have inverted.

Women-worship is a form of idolatry. Despite their posturing, women were not meant for veneration. Males have been brainwashed to seek female approval.

The sex act is the act of procreation. If we believe life is sacred, it should be consecrated as well. Using it for a cheap thrill dehumanizes us.

"They are sexus sequior, the inferior second sex in every respect: one should be indulgent toward their weaknesses, but to pay them honour is ridiculous beyond measure and demeans us even in their eyes."

Women (i.e. sex) veneration has made women so arrogant "that one is sometimes reminded of the sacred apes of Benares which, conscious of their own sanctity and inviolability, thought themselves at liberty to do whatever they pleased."  - Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

Disclaimer: I do not endorse all of Schopenhauer's views, but present them as an antidote to Masonic Jewish inflation of women, which is designed to emasculate men and destabilize society. For example, I believe in the nuclear family and do not endorse polygamy. Nor do I agree with Schopenhauer financial provisions.

by Arthur Schopenhauer
(Excerpts by

The nature of the female

[Nature] has provided her with superabundant beauty and charm for a few years at the expense of the whole remainder of her life, so that during these years she may so capture the imagination of a man that he is carried away into undertaking to support her honorably in some form or another for the rest of her life, a step he would seem hardly likely to take for purely rational considerations.

Pauline_Bonaparte_2.jpgThus nature has equipped women, as it has all its creatures, with the tools and weapons she needs for securing her existence, and at just the time she needs them; in doing which nature has acted with its usual economy. For just as the female ant loses its wings after mating, since they are then superfluous, indeed harmful to the business of raising the family, so the woman usually loses her beauty after one or two child-beds, and probably for the same reason.

Female truth

The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflection but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning: hence their instinctive subtlety and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defense, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning.

Dissimulation is thus inborn in her and consequently to be found in the stupid woman almost as often as in the clever one. To make use of it at every opportunity is as natural to her as it is for an animal to employ its means of defence whenever it is attacked, and when she does so she feels that to some extent she is only exercising her rights. A completely truthful woman who does not practice dissimulation is perhaps an impossibility, which is why women see through the dissimulation of others so easily it is inadvisable to attempt it with them.  But this fundamental defect which I have said they possess, together with all that is associated with it, gives rise to falsity, unfaithfulness, treachery, ingratitude, etc. Women are guilty of perjury far more often than men. It is questionable whether they ought to be allowed to take an oath at all.

Feminine charms

Only a male intellect clouded by the sexual drive could call the stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped and short-legged sex the fair sex: for it is with this drive that all its beauty is bound up.

art.png(l. She's defecating.)

More fittingly than the fair sex, women could be called the unaesthetic sex...Nor can one expect anything else from women if one considers that the most eminent heads of the entire sex have proved incapable of a single truly great, genuine and original achievement in art, or indeed of creating anything at all of lasting value: this strikes one most forcibly in regard to painting, since they are just as capable of mastering its technique as we are, and indeed paint very busily, yet cannot point to a single great painting; the reason being precisely that they lack all objectivity of mind, which is what painting demands above all else. Isolated and partial exceptions do not alter the case: women, taken as a whole, are and remain thorough and incurable philistines: so that, with the extremely absurd arrangement by which they share the rank and title of their husband, they are a continual spur to his ignoble ambitions. They are sexus sequior, the inferior second sex in every respect: one should be indulgent toward their weaknesses, but to pay them honour is ridiculous beyond measure and demeans us even in their eyes.

Insipid women-veneration

This is how the peoples of antiquity and of the Orient have regarded women; they have recognized what is the proper position for women far better than we have, we with our Old French gallantry and insipid women-veneration, that highest flower of Christian-Germanic stupidity which has served only to make women so rude and arrogant that one is sometimes reminded of the sacred apes of Benares which, conscious of their own sanctity and inviolability, thought themselves at liberty to do whatever they pleased.

booksch.jpgNo argument about polygamy

There can be no argument about polygamy: it is a fact to be met with everywhere and the only question is how to regulate it. For who is really a monogamist? We all live in polygamy, at least for a time and usually for good. Since every man needs many women, there could be nothing more just than that he should be free, indeed obliged, to support many women. This would also mean the restoration of woman to her rightful and natural position, the subordinate one, and the abolition from the world of the lady, with her ridiculous claims to respect and veneration; there would then be only women, and no longer unhappy women, of which Europe is at present full.

Property and inheritance

In India, no woman is ever independent, but in accordance with the law of Manu, she stands under the control of her father, her husband, her brother or her son. It is, to be sure, a revolting thing that a widow should immolate herself upon her husband's funeral pyre; but it is also revolting that she should spend her husband's money with her paramours - the money for which he toiled his whole life long, in the consoling belief that he was providing for his children. Happy are those who have kept the middle course - medium tenuere beati.

Related- Thinking is a Bad Habit  (About thought control and switching the center of our being.)
Occult Plan to Disinherit Males Revealed in 1852
Sports Illustrated Cover Criticized

First Comment from Brittany:

I have been visiting your site for a while now and generally enjoy reading your articles. I would call myself an awake and aware person and agree with you on most things. I am married, female and a social studies teacher in a public school and do my best trying to wake middle and highschoolers up to the Illuminati system, and have even lost a job due to my efforts. I am also an artist and homesteader.

I introduce myself in this way because I find your position on females to be somewhat offensive as someone who agrees with you on most of the feminism stuff. Modern feminism is mostly an attempt to extract women from the household into industry in order to hide the destruction of the dollar. And I agree, it is sad to watch so many women obsess over their looks or use their sexuality as a weapon.

 However, a lot of women want to find a man who will take care of them so that they raise a family and being physically attractive helps. I don't see why this is viewed as some kind of demonic thing. Interestingly, in the animal world, it is often the male who must impress a mate with his physical attractiveness as she is often less beautiful so as to blend in with the surroundings and protect the next generation from predators (peacocks and ducks, for one).

This article really rubbed me the wrong way. Not all women are dumb, stupid brutes that need to be controlled by a patriarchal system. And there have been many great female painters- Frida Kahlo, Rosalba Carriera Elisabetta Siriani to name a few. Sure, they don't get a lot of attention, but that doesn't discount how beautiful their works are.

We both have an affinity for hard-hitting journalism but let's not forget it was a female investigative journalist- Ida Tarbell, who stood up to the Rockefeller family and pioneered investigative journalism against these Illuminati families.

It is absolutely true that men contribute so much to Western society and there is nothing wrong with that. Men are awesome- they really are. Everyday I love my husband more and more for everything that he does for us. I visited Italy and truly admired the great works of art created by men.Not once did I resent not seeing an equal number of works by women. However, I do believe that historically, career roles for women were very very restricted. Women raised babies and took care of families and that was about it unless you were living in poverty and had to earn wages washing clothes, wet nursing, cleaning, prostitution, etc. It is great that women raise families but claiming that women are somehow talentless or inferior because fewer of them had resources/opportunities to create great works of art in their spare time is simply not true.

But there are great women contributors to Western History too like Joan of Arc. American Margaret Heffernan Borland is the only woman known to have led a cattle drive of 10,000 in the Old West. Annie Oakley could shoot better than most men and lets not forget the Native American Sacagawea who helped Lewis and Clark figure out where the heck they were going. Currently, artist/sculptor Heidi Wastweet is creating beautiful anti-Illuminati silver coin designs which proves to me that there are smart talented women out there who have an understanding of how the world works and are using their talents to create a better world.

I just don't understand why you must be so cruel on the subject of women. Women need men as much as men need women. Women should not be worshiped but neither should men. We should have an intense respect for each other.

In fact, I am leaving my teaching slave-wage job at the end of this school year to pursue homesteading, family and other things that give my life meaning.



PS. Anyways, in case you were interested in why I lost my last job- my students and I arranged a town-hall meeting with Congressman Pete Sessions and we asked him all kinds of conspiracy-style questions. I suddenly lost my position at the end of the school year despite that my students had excellent AP scores and one of my students used the footage to make an award winning CSPAN student-cam documentary on free markets.

Here is an article written about my students including a link to the full town hall (student questions subtitled for your convenience),

PPS. I am the ONLY government/econ/history teacher I know (male or female) who has the courage to do anything like this. Bottom line: most people are living in fear and will not stand up to injustice. It doesn't matter what gender you are.

Thanks Brittany- This article was directed at men to help them overcome powerful mind control. I realize there are a lot of sane wonderful smart women still, and you sound like one of them. Many of the best anti-NWO pioneers have been women like Edith Starr Miller, featured yesterday,
Nesta Webster, Olivia Marie O'Grady, Bella Dodd, Elizabeth Dilling and
Pequita de Shishmareff.


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Undoing Male Sex Programming "

Tom said (April 8, 2015):

"Yea, it is far easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than it is for a horny man to attain enlightenment."

My male tenants ALL think with their dicks and suffer accordingly.

I can think of somewhere between 5 and 10 times when I could have penetrated a woman but chose not to do so. The litmus test is simple: "Would I want to have a child with this person?"

On the other hand, if it was with a few of the someones with whom I would have been happy to have a kid with, I fired away.

I never had any kids, so now you know why the world is such a piece of crap: it is largely populated by people who are so primitive that they think with their dicks.

I don't think you and I are human beings, Henry. We are something else, and that is all there is to it. Most human beings are nothing but glorified animals. After 57 years, this is my conclusion.

Bill said (April 7, 2015):

The insights Schopenhauer shares about the basic nature of women is something every father should teach his sons. Mine did not, probably because his did not. As a result, we wasted many years of our lives lost in confusion, wondering how best to deal with these mysterious creatures. I obeyed the unanimous teaching of my parents, teachers, pastors and lawyers to never hit a female (even if she hits me) and to always be a gentleman (even if she is abusing me emotionally, verbally and financially). The idea that females are GOOD and deserve respect based solely on the fact that they were born female is just WRONG.

The only statement I disagreed with is "every man needs many women." As a MGTOW, I have found that I do not need ANY women. Chuck Swindoll told the story of a mature Christian man in his congregation who had never married. He mentored the young men and was well respected for his grace and wisdom. One day a youth asked him, "sir, you have so much to offer a women - how is it you have never been married?" The man smiled and replied, "well son, I would rather want what I can't have than have what I don't want." Amen.

Coastx said (April 6, 2015):

Getting close! For those who are unaware, three months abstinence= mastery cycle, but the method is trick and a bit precipitous for the initiate.

The limbic brain will manifest all sorts of psychological incitements making the first one of these a damn near impossibility. Very few can do this, Henry, although this is something all males need to learn. Torturous first run. Ha!

You might want to start a research cohort and get men to talk about what they are going through and have in common with this project so you can duplicate and publish this information for the public. It doesn't currently exist, so this would be a ground breaking contribution to a world that remains largely confused about male sexual arousal and sex. Book, maybe?

Very important, because you will have effectively developed information to demystify male sexual arousal, dramatically increased self-control and put a HUGE dent in the sex market world wide.

You will ALSO have a lot of enemies. Ha!

Sallyann said (April 6, 2015):

I'm disappointed in you Henry. This was not written by someone who wants to inform on the truth - this is written by someone who has an absolute contempt and hatred for 50% of the human population (just like Cecil Rhodes, a homosexual). He has reduced this 50% to the level of animals (but only in his own sick mind). The use of extreme photography has nothing to do with anything except attention seekers (usually instigated by males behind the camera of course).

Women are not animals any more than men. We most certainly have rational minds!

Of course the decision to brainwash women (through the Tavistock mindcontrol Institute) towards 'feminism' in order to annihilate the traditional self-reliant family unit has been very successful at least in the west and decadence has escalated thanks to the machinations of the same powers that be. The way to counteract that is to inform women of the truth, not to demean and degrade women.


I am tired of repeating this is an antidote for men putting women on a pedestal, which is also Illuminati programming.


T said (April 6, 2015):

I commend Henry for digging Arthur Schopenhauer's gender viewpoints from the archives. This is truly fascinating stuff.

Personally, I agree with Schopenhauer's basic summary of the female gender - and especially as it manifests itself in what passes for the "Western World". I agree because I have seen all that he describes with my own eyes. For example, during the 1980s I witnessed a once healthy engineering company being destroyed by the gargantuan ego of just one, very attractive, 30-something, manipulative female who was well used to being "out of control", despite being married to an early version of a metro-sexual 'male'.

Schopenhauer's acerbic characterizations also happen to closely match the views long held by much wiser cultures that lie well to the East of Europe ... and on another planet entirely to that pathetic Matriarchal landmass we call North America (i.e., both USA and Canada).

The Western World has been ill-served by North American women who are far too bold, far too outspoken, far too aggressive, meddlesome, and contemptuous of the male gender generally.

Your typically arrogant American female (in particular) thinks she owns the Universe, and beyond. So with that in mind, I would suggest Schopenhauer's assessment is quite polite and restrained, at least when it comes to seeing today's social mess for what it really is, warts and all.

My own English women are corrosive enough. They've had that reputation since the 19th century. But American women can be relied upon to be an order of magnitude worse. I have met many American gals in several parts of this world, including within the USA. All I can say is that you American males have no real idea what it is like to live a dignified male life; so hen-pecked are you. No wonder you keep wanting, in compensation, to make war on everybody else.

Half the madness currently dragging the western world down today would never have gained traction had our respective societies had the common-sense and the guts to kill off Second Wave Feminism (1960s) while it was still gestating.

These days, just about everything has been 'feminized' such that science is now far more about enforcing the 'right' emotions and feelings, than about proper research and hard-facts.

We need to turn the clock back, and rediscover our collective sanity. All women aged under 30 should be banned from voting in all National / Presidential elections. Then we'd see a most healthy transformation take place almost overnight. Guaranteed.

LoisAnn said (April 6, 2015):

Now, now, now, Henry. For some time you have entertained me and even amused me with a good deal of your theories. But, I believe you've jumped over the line this time. Women were NOT placed here to be your random playmates, to be used when you feel the make that 'urge'...and certainly not verbally abused publicly in your articles. This is the most de-meaning article you have ever written and obviously you have no shame OR respect for the opposite sex. Ever since your alarm system went off on your last birthday you seem to be headed smack dab into Cranksvlle.Just because you've aged in numbers is no reason to start acting like a grumpy old man. So, get off your self maintained pedestal and fall in line with all the others because it happens to everyone now and then. Learn to laugh, live it up a little and quit being so hard on yourself. Guess you've proved your point. Everybody gets the short end of the deal from time to time. Get used to it. It's far more fun to be laughed with that AT.



As I said to Brittany, this article was intended to undo Illuminati programming which has put women on a pedestal in the minds of men, and emasculated them.


Sami said (April 6, 2015):

I hate to ruin your guilty pleasure of supermarket shopping but unfortunately all those foodstuffs are so cheap and available is due to straight military dominance over developing countries. For example I think France has 4 aircraft carriers docked in front of the country that produces cocoa for chocolates. In addition farmers in India and other countries are exceptionally poor although logically since these farmers own the most important product which is food should be very wealthy but again the 'democracy' and 'free enterprise' is a front when in actually they are being oppressed so we can have cheap food.

Ken Adachi said (April 6, 2015):

Schopenhauer's views are distorted, unintelligent, and inaccurate. Only articles characterized by truth, honesty, and clear insight into the human condition should be offered in rebuttal to Illuminated propaganda.

Magda said (April 6, 2015):

Schopenhauer essay is an exercise in negativity and since like attracts like we became witnesses to his personal and very subjective experiences.

How about eschewing women who lie for a relationship in the same way you would not go into business with a man who lies? While we are at it, why don't we cry in our cups of tea at the big lies many men (and the few women) have engaged in, in government, law and business?

We should be people of moderation, no to extreme adoration of women and no to hatred of women but the middle way and most of all do not be unjust. The truth is that painters and creative artisans of all types need a stable upbringing, a decent family. A loving bosom to nurture and blossom that creativity, like a house is worth nothing without a strong foundation.

Second, I would gaze with admiration at a family that is well mannered and compassionate much as I would gaze admiringly at a beautiful painting.

Though both are awesome to behold we can all agree that the utility of good people is paramount in the defense and encouragement of what we all hold dear. Perhaps that is why the NWO requires the destruction of the good family because they are essential to the growth of common sense and solutions rather than inverted morality and evil.

Quran 67:22-23

"Then is one who walks fallen on his face better guided or one who walks erect on a straight path?Say, "It is He who has produced you and made for you hearing and vision and hearts; little are you grateful."

Greg said (April 5, 2015):

Charles Bukowski:

"Don't wait for the good woman. She doesn't exist. There are women who can make you feel more with their bodies and their souls but these are the exact women who will turn the knife into you right in front of the crowd. Of course, I expect this, but the knife still cuts. The female loves to play man against man, and if she is in a position to do it there is not one who will resist. The male, for all his bravado and exploration, is the loyal one, the one who generally feels love. The female is skilled at betrayal and torture and damnation. Never envy a man his lady. Behind it all lies a living hell."

Al Thompson said (April 5, 2015):

This article is really bad. I hope this guy walks around town with adult supervision.

First of all, nature doesn't make anything. Nature is a combination of systems and things which are created by God. So his premise here is flawed from the beginning.

The lack of any "female character" will manifest itself from disobeying God's commandments and the natural law which God established. Nature does not establish itself. "Dissimulation" is the poor results received from disobeying the natural law. This evil is not inbreed in any man or woman, it is the result of poor behavior and bad character.

The problem with women is the feminist movement and the problem with men is that they allow it. Finding a woman who hasn't been affected by feminism is almost impossible. Everyone is making it harder on themselves by tolerating feminism. In addition, the influences of the occult are extremely damaging to both men and women.

Most men can't handle one woman properly, let alone multiple "wives." Under the natural law, polygamy is just another stupid idea that comes from the occult.

The dignity of women has declined under feminism. This is due to the ugly moral standards that are present today. The knowledge of those standards are latent & present within each and every man, woman, and child. The dignity of a woman is present in those who stay with their husbands, and put together a good example for their children.

This article insults the intelligence of the most ignorant among us.

D said (April 5, 2015):

I am sure I am a woman, and I am equally sure I have always despised this "dissimulation". I couldn’t tell a lie, if my life depended on it. I might try, but I have reasons to believe that I would not be convincing and successful. Let me now assure you that although men have often found me attractive in my younger years, upon exposure to my sincerity and my preference for rational argument over emotional blackmail, they equally often found me lacking in... mystery (not my choice of word).

I once (as a married woman) presented before a male friend of my husband's my case against a certain woman based in her utter dishonesty and meanness. It was he who provided me with facts upon which I built my psychological analysis of that psychopathic creature. Ha agreed with me, but decided to pursue her anyway, saying: "I love her leather pants and stilettos. She is so cute." He loved the look so much, he asked why I didn't favour it. I said unthinkingly that I didn't even have money for leather, to which he offered to pay for a pair for me! He was convinced I would do the world a favour if I tried to expose my attributes more. I was very insulted, because I value my mind more, and it was my mind and character that I prefer exposing.

It really happened. He was always used and abused by similar women, and always called them (!) shallow in the end. When I proposed that being the one who sought the most dishonest and shallow women to pursue them, he could only blame himself, he responded that I lacked feminine qualities. Here comes this mystery-thing again.

Johan said (April 5, 2015):

I also share your guilt in being a supermarket groupie. Your wife sounds very much like mine whom I also believe complement me. Nonetheless I think we are probably MK by their marketing strategies. Here in South Africa loyalty cards are big! Drawing us into their shops with bonuses, specials and accumulating double points. They do this because they can keep track of our buying patterns and using this information to tempt us back into their shops. Is it a coincidence to receive vouchers for items you routinely purchase? This should alert us to the fact that we are being manipulated by our lack of privacy and that “Big Brother” knows more about us then we should feel comfortable with.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at