Direct Link to Latest News

 

I'm Optimistic About Harveygate

November 11, 2017

harveygate.jpg
(The accused, mostly elite Jews and predatory gays. What's not to love? )

My colleague Tim Fitzpatrick tweeted yesterday, 
"Is the overarching reason why all these sex scandals 
are coming out now due to some anti-male agenda 
for the long term?"
These scandals might do some good. 
Sex is an integral part of the Cabalist system of satanic possession.
If women are freed from oppression, maybe society might be freed as well. We need to raise male-female relations above the level of sex.



by Henry Makow Ph.D. 

There may be an "anti-male agenda" behind these sex scandals but they threaten a power structure that depends on sexual decadence
and blackmail. 

Sexual harassment in the entertainment industry has been tolerated for a long time because the perpetrators were considered
untouchable. This is no longer the case as the careers of men like Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey and Louis CK have been destroyed overnight.  

This sexual exploitation and oppression mirror and overlap the political oppression of society by the Illuminati (Freemasonry, Organized Jewry). 
Often it is the same people. For example, G.H.W. Bush has been accused of fondling an actress' rear. But we know he is a pedophile guilty of much worse. 

The dam burst when two Illuminati house organs The New Yorker and the New York Times broke ranks with the other msm and published the  allegations of numerous women. (Reporter Ronan Farrow had a motivation. He has accused Woody Allen of preying on his sister Dylan when she was six.) 

Sexual decadence is both a requirement for membership in the Illuminati and a means by which the Illuminati controls its members. However, this decadence might spread to many Illuminati pawns functioning in politics and government as well. This might be the beginning of a societal cleansing and a swing back to morality. 

There is nothing "anti-male" about prohibiting sexual exploitation based on a position of power. Women are plenty approachable
on a civilized basis. 

DISCERNMENT

Harveygate has given rise to dozens of accusations ranging from unwanted groping to rape dating back decades. The latest is directed at George Takei from 36 years ago!  (For Chrissakes, this is what gays do!) We will be inundated with these stories unless we focus on this key question, "Is this man (or woman) a sexual predator now, or recently? Is there a long-term pattern?" 

In the case of Harvey Weinstein or Kevin Spacey, the answer is clearly yes. 

I have no use for liberal comedian Louis CK, or his new movie "I Love You Daddy." (When did filthy become synonymous with funny?) However, if after exposing himself to two female comedians 16 years ago, has he reformed?  If he hasn't, he deserves his fate. (Apparently, it was an ongoing pattern.)

Lolita.jpg
If Judge Roy Moore fondled a 14-year-old girl almost four decades ago, that certainly is reprehensible. He denies he ever knew this woman. It is quite possible that the CIA-owned and run Washington Post concocted this story. After all their false flags, this would be a piece of cake. The Washington Post is the Deep State. 

But for argument's sake, say they didn't. People make mistakes over a lifetime. They change and deserve a second chance. Moore is not being accused of rape. We know the Washington Post cares nothing about the harm done to this girl's innocence. These allegations are all about the balance of power. Liberals are "outraged" by Moore but in favor of teaching much younger children about "fisting" in public school. They praise Lolita (1962) as a work of art. Liberals are hypocrites. They only care about sex crimes when they can incriminate an opponent. The Democratic Party elite assaults children on a regular basis

Pedophilia seems to be the last taboo. That's good but I expect it is only because the Illuminati use it to worship Satan and to control their rank and file. Why would successful people like Weinstein and Louis CK engage in this gratuitous, self-destructive behavior? Why would CK think any woman would want to see his dick? I suspect there is an occult (satanic) motivation at work here. 

I am sanguine because the Internet allows for instant worldwide communication. More Illuminati crimes will be exposed and more deviants will be removed. Women cowered before sexual predators. We all cower before political predators of a worse kind. Maybe they will be exposed in the same way.

----

Related - Canadian law will protect accusers from scrutiny
Makow   - Sexual Depravity is the Hallmark of Satanic Possession 

First Comment by Andrew:

Tim Fitzpatrick is right. At least, I came to the same conclusion about the current explosion of "sexual harassment" claims. For the last month, The New York Times has exposed another harassment case practically every day, After Weinstein: A List of Men Accused of Sexual Misconduct and the Fallout for Each  There was even one against 93-year-old, George Herbert Walker Bush. See George H.W. Bush responds after actress accuses him of sexual assault 

Of course, the anti-male attacks are as old as the word, "Misandry." "Activist Warren Farrell has written of his views on how men are uniquely marginalized in what he calls their "disposability", the manner in which the most dangerous occupations, notably soldiering and mining, were historically performed exclusively by men and remain so today. In his book, The Myth of Male Power, Farrell argues that patriarchal societies do not make rules to benefit men at the expense of women. Farrell contends that nothing is more telling about who has benefited from "men's rules" than life expectancy, which is lower in males, and suicide rates, which are higher in males.[13] 

Religious Studies professors Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young made similar comparisons in their 2001 three-book series Beyond the Fall of Man,[14] which refers to misandry as a "form of prejudice and discrimination that has become institutionalized in North American society", writing, "The same problem that long prevented mutual respect between Jews and Christians, the teaching of contempt, now prevents mutual respect between men and women." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misandry#cite_note-NYspreading-4_6-14








Comments for " I'm Optimistic About Harveygate "

Miro said (November 14, 2017):

Scandals are a desensitizing strategy, using Celebrities to make it look like a common theme. After seeing few of those, many will start thinking "if the people higher up do it, it must be normal".
I have heard that more often than I should have.
But it doesn't mean the celebrities like that! They get hijacked by contract to submit to any form of marketing of their work so it is legal to do it that way, if it is called for.
They really have no say in this matter.


Tammi said (November 13, 2017):

I agree that there are several agendas being played out with the recent so-called 'sex scandals' hitting the media, however I think one thing is being overlooked. These satanists, luciferians, NWO globalists, whatever you wish to call them, will go to any lengths to achieve their objectives. They will gladly throw someone to the wolves so to speak, or even allow THEMSELVES to take the fall if it furthers the agenda.

In the last few decades we've seen homosexuality, transgenderism, 'soft' porn and a myriad of other perversions become not only mainstream fodder, but socially acceptable behaviors.

This sudden outpouring of 'this happened to me too', is not an accidental event. This is a ruse to put this filth out there. Talk about it. Write about it. Put it on the Dr. Phil show to be digested by the unsuspecting masses.

Look, if a person wants to go to Hollywood and sell their soul for fame and fortune, I'm sure that by the time it is within their reach they will know what's up. What they are doing right now is mainstreaming the pedophilia. This will be their next sick perversion that they will seek to normalize.

"See! It's everywhere!" "Its just been covered up, just like homosexuality!" "It's really completely normal, it's just a sexual preference!" The next thing you know the rest of us will be expected to not only believe this but embrace it. That is if we dont want to be called pedophobic. (Im not sure, but i might have made that word up) Anyway, im certainly no expert on anything, this is my opinion based on past observation. The real tragedy here is that people buy into this nonsense and accept it as fact after enough indoctrination.

Let me close with heartfelt empathy to the true victims of these predators, I'm not trying to minimize the reality that people have, and do suffer from these atrocities. To these minions of hell, that is completely irrelevant.


Giancarlo said (November 12, 2017):

"Sexual harassment in the entertainment industry has been tolerated"

Common sense would suggest that practice, rather than tolerated, was standard in the trade & of mutual satisfaction..
In perspective, all such choral cry looks as manifestation post-coital-dysphorya...
As for oral perfomances, twenty+ years to throw up what swallowed, rather then spontaneous looks induces as by classical two fingers in the throat. All, in all, stories resemble "rape" as denounced by "sex workers"..., that too fashionable nowadays..

Indeed, rather than outcry-cum-frenziness in the script.. - in Hollywood parlance - its direction & distribution deserving scrutiny & investigation. Below* some notes worth considering.

Kind regards,
Giancarlo

* http://mileswmathis.com/wein.pdf
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=160673


Troy said (November 12, 2017):

If I may add my two cents, I don't believe that this is unrelated to the crashing box office profits. Maybe this is their "dramatic way" of firing underperforming individuals.


Troy said (November 12, 2017):

If I may add my two cents, I don't believe that this is unrelated to the crashing box office profits. Maybe this is their "dramatic way" of firing underperforming individuals.


Ryan M said (November 11, 2017):

While I agree with you Henry, on many of the points you have made. I also agree with Tim's assertion of an anti-male agenda to further drive a wedge between the sexes and help justify man hate"nasty girl" feminism. I see it as a way to stifle free speech and open dialogue between men and women for fear of "saying the wrong thing." Just more of the same PC BS. It seems any one can make an accusation and one is automatically guilty in the court of public opinion fueled by the controlled corporate media. This is social conditioning. Where accounts of boorish behavior by movie stars are now being presented in the same light as crimes by real sexual deviants.

I also think this purge is a warning and message to Hollywood that if someone as powerful as Harvey Weinstein can be thrown under the bus, anyone can! I can only imagine the paranoia and distrust running through Hollywood right now.

Or just maybe, this is all unscripted and Trump really is draining the swamp. Like you wrote Henry "This might be the beginning of a societal cleansing and a swing back to morality." Here's hoping.


Tim D said (November 11, 2017):

What comes to mind for me is that the PTB will make examples of a few of their own from time to time. They will destroy their lives as a sort of example to keep the rest (who have been co-opted to the same crimes - they all are) in line, in fear and terror of what they can and will expose. The timing might indicate a sort of "crisis" point where there was some threat of some going "off the reservation" so to speak.

Battles behind the scenes surrounding Trump could be going on etc. I would find it curious if the recent people chosen - Harvey, Spacey, and Senator Moore have somehow done this - have sort of given an indication of breaking ranks and turning over a new leaf so to speak. Not going along quietly. So the PTB make an example of them so others don't get similar ideas.

I always assume the opposite because most of the mainstream is lies. I always said - one of the best reasons to believe in Trump was pushing in the right direction is due to how vehement he is attacked by them. Anyone attacked by them I am inclined to believe has to be on the side of truth or at least is a threat to go that way.


Robert K said (November 11, 2017):

You might be sanguine about a radical change, but what is the basis on which you expect one? The appropriation of the communal cultural heritage--including, where material productivity is concerned, technological progress--by the credit-allotting financial system has not been altered.

People are still born with their economic rights undefined, and therefore effectively nil. Centrally controlled financial power inevitably creates a hierarchical structure to which the individual must adapt in order to obtain the income he/she needs in order to survive. In other words, prostitution of the soul is intrinsic to the current economic system as a whole, not just the entertainment industry, and lowlife intermediaries within it will continue to exploit their advantageous positions for nefarious ends.

If there ever was a time when limited productive capacity made this situation to an extent unavoidable, in the age of robotic mass-manufacturing this is patently no longer the case. But, enjoying their relatively privileged seats, the politicians and economists--servants themselves of the Money Power--are not letting on that decentralizing financial power unconditionally to the level of the individual is an option.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at