Direct Link to Latest News

 

Sexual Harassment OverKill

December 10, 2017

xmas-party.png(A chill falls over heterosexuals)

Much as I enjoy seeing so many liberal hacks flame out, a distinction should be made
between predators like Harvey Weinstein/Kevin Spacey, and the merely uncouth like Al Franken/Charlie Rose. Only the former should lose their jobs. The latter should be put on notice by employers. 

This latest campaign is part of an orchestrated program to make heterosexuality a pathology.
Heterosexual union is based on women entrusting their power to a man. 
This requires that a man earns her trust through courtship. The focus on bad behavior by so
many prominent men undermines women's trust. It reminds me of a feminist workshop I attended where a mannequin of a Korean comfort woman described the indignities she suffered from Japanese soldiers. I could feel a frigid pall descend on the audience of impressionable young women, many of whom who crossed their legs. This is how lesbians are made.

Many women trade on their sex appeal, especially in show business. They are not blameless.   Below, Dave Daubenmire presents a realistic and un-PC vision of recent focus on harassment. 



Is Feminism Ruining Relationships?
by Dave Daubenmire
(abridged by henrymakow.com) 

I have to confess that all of this talk about sexual harassment of women is driving me a bit crazy.  I also know that it is getting more and more risky to speak out against the established narrative as presented to us by the national thought police...


time-poy-cover-today-inline-171206_3633a49c0d3498c7a1d042f396b125d9.nbcnews-fp-360-360.jpg
(Ashley Judd, self-described "nasty woman" i.e. man hater featured by TIME)  

In all of the cackling about equality, and equal rights I find it amusing that we allow the fall-back position of so many "strong" women to be "he harassed me."  Sex was designed to be a participatory exercise and in a nation that now declares all "genders" equal how are women able to get away with playing the role of the helpless, weaker victim in this charade of sexual victimization?

Whoa Nelly.  Before you start accusing me of being soft on rape, please understand that I think I know what rape looks like and agree with the Biblical standard of rape being a death penalty crime.  But "sexual harassment" is not rape...so spare me the moralizing, please.

Sex in the workplace is nothing new.  In fact, it has for decades destroyed more marriages than Hustler Magazine. Satan himself was the first single guy in recorded history to hit on another man's wife and his philandering led to the downfall of the entire human race.

Yes, my friends, all adultery begins with flirtation and, like it or not, many a romance began with a pat on the rump or the twist of a tongue.  If Adam had simply manned up and defended his wife's honor perhaps Matt Lauer would still have a job.  In sexually liberated America fornication has replaced bobbing for apples as the activity of choice of most unmarried couples.

I wonder how many of the "strong" women that Lauer "victimized" took his bait in hopes of trading a little affection for a possible career boost.  Sex is often about power and you will never convince me that modern professional women are not aware of the power that lies a few inches below their belly button.  For every woman that was appalled by Lauer's advances there were probably ten who swallowed the hook.

pussypower-600-x-400.jpg
Puhleeze...spare me the "he took advantage of me" sob stories. I was in attendance at the Million Woman March in Washington and I saw a boo-coo number of signs extolling "P-ssy Power."  (Those were their words not\mine.)  So evidently our feline friends understand a bit more than they let on about the concealed weapon they carry in their pantsuits.

Look folks, as much as we would like to we cannot have it both ways.  We can't have our cake and eat it too.  How in the world can the "liberated" American female cry inequality while holding the power of sex like the sword of Damocles over their male co-workers?  Sorry to be so pig-headed, but I think men deserve better treatment than that.

It takes two to tango and a woman can say "no" just as easily as a man can.  One can only imagine the number of men in the work place who have been jerked around by some pretty thing batting her eyes and swinging her hips only to receive a face-palm when they "misread" the bread crumbs that she dropped as she walked by.

Let me drop\another truth crumb and then you are free to hurl your epithets my way.  Modesty is a thing of the past in America.   When fornication has become nothing more than another social activity it is apparent that women are not always offended by WHAT a man says to her in the workplace, but rather WHO the man is that says it.  If she likes the dude it is flirting.  If she doesn't, it is harassment.

I recently saw a statistic that explained that nearly 70% of men under the age of 30 are not married.  As the old saying goes, "why pay for the cow when you can get the milk for free?"  In this age of "P-ssy Power" the charge of sexual exploitation begins to ring hollow.  Are we to believe that ALL American women are virtuous?

We are going to have to make a decision here in the good ole US of A?  Are men and women equal or not?  This selective outrage regarding pre-fornication dialogue is not going to end well.

Why do you think the girls loved to hang around Al Franken?  Remember, the old commercial, "membership has its privileges?"   How does one defend himself from sex charges when all he was doing was putting some bait in the traps?

---
Makow comment-  The Illuminati do not give a damn about human rights, women's rights or gay rights. They are out to destabilize society by destroying heterosexuality, i.e. gender,  marriage and family. Satanists are waging a war on us disguised as progress and justice. The love between man and women is one of the best things in life. That's why it must be destroyed. 
-------

Related-   Sexual Chill falls over Workplace 
-------------The Warlock Hunt  Moral Panic
------------ Gender Based Hate Crimes Considered in UK

First Comment by Marco A:

The only people who would think that there is an exaggeration on sexual harassment are Men's Rights Activists and their apologists. MRA is essentially feminism for men; it is as dysfunctional and always leads to bitterness towards women.

Sexual harassment is sexual harassment, and sexual harassment with a physical nature is sexual assault, and a criminal offence. When you have influential people especially politicians engaging in this behaviour, why come to their defence? Are all men pigs? Are there no truly moral men out there who can be put into office?
 
I can think of many upright men who have never treated a women in that manner to replace them all. 

"If she likes the dude it is flirting.  If she doesn't, it is harassment." Since when did forcing yourself on a woman become flirting, you fool?

Furthermore, falsely accusing someone on these grounds is likewise a serious crime, its called defamation, to start. Are we to be so naive to think that the women who accuse these men aren't aware of this and are willing to take that risk, and that they are all liars? How cruel and deluded...

As for the volume of accusations coming out, one reason may be that women may feel that they will finally be believed when accusing these big players. 




Comments for "Sexual Harassment OverKill "

Hector said (December 11, 2017):

Sorry Marco (first comment) but you are the deluded fool. People like you are responsible for the mess sexual relations are in. Were it not for people like you, ridiculous laws that put one sex over the other in order to "compensate for past injustices" (most of them product of imaginations like yours) would have never com to pass.

The powers that be want to destroy the relationships between men and women and thanks to people like you that rejected the divine doctrine and have turned women into idols (mere projections of some blameless and sinless maiden that only exists inside the heads of most of you), they are closer than ever to achieve their aims.

Man and woman are complementary and, dare I say, need each other. The saddest thing is that while men that have abused women (and in many cases even children) roam the streets, men whose only crime seems to be naivety and not enough attractiveness to the opposite sex are made to pay fines and serve time in prison.


Dan P said (December 10, 2017):

The point of it all seems to have been missed here.
If the system truly wanted to help women why weren't any of today's allegations properly investigated back when they may have first been alleged?

Look how the lawyers back in 1988 purposely thwarted a much needed investigation with their hockey super hero surf-distraction Doug Gilmour...http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1988-10-30/news/8802110465_1_attorney-doug-gilmour-richard-schwartz.

And this has taken place a lot with those glorified hockey serfdom-superstars!
[There is one woman right now I feel beyond sorry for she was raped by a hockey well known and her matter needs to be investigated and it will all perverted by other women and what is taking place here]!
There are rapes that have taken place but before any rapes can be properly investigated we need to hold to account this very broken-corrupt legal system!
The sexual assault allegations are being used today by the industry/system only to keep men in their place against any possible rebellion against their already deeply corrupt system!
Many men out there are concerned that when they were younger they may be now held to account for a pet here or a pet there.
Hollywood needs to be held to account for a lot more than just these sexual assaults and right now it is being misused again for the above by the system!
Again, the system just kept their nuts of sexual perversions all stored away until they knew they would be needed...when that boat of corruption really started to rock against them all!

"We have castrated society through fear and intimidation. Its manhood exists only in combination with a feminine outward appearance. Being so neutered, the populace has become docile and easily ruled. - By Dr. Makow Insider: Protocols Largely Realized (1976)
Also look at the money lawyers are going to make in so called prosecuting and or legal suits flowing from it all!


Tony B said (December 10, 2017):

Enjoyable truths by this man.

Do women today truly not want male compliments on their beauty? I doubt that as it denies the whole female mindset. As the writer implied, now they get the law to keep away those they don't want hitting on them instead of simply saying so themselves. Gee, such a bother! A compliment is a compliment, no matter from whom it comes. It cannot sometimes be welcomed and other times be a crime.

In times past it took a truly ugly waitress not to get the occasional pat on the butt. Generally the woman's reaction was a smile, meaning it was taken as a compliment, not an attempted rape.

What has purposely been done artificially to humanity through so-called "feminism" is to set up a false barrier between the sexes, further reducing creation of families and resulting population generation. This, of course, makes control of people easier for those who want to rule.


Kirk S said (December 10, 2017):

Keep in mind that many of these "me too" persons of the year made allegations years, even decades after the alleged impropriety. This could be due to cowardice, delusions, maybe outright lying, but it is not moral. No one should take these allegations seriously unless the so-called victim does. If it wasn't important then, it's not important now.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at