Direct Link to Latest News


Jews & Christians are Bamboozled by Judaism - Michael Hoffman

June 23, 2018

"Orthodox Judaism above all is, a religion of deceit and self-worship, 
and pride is the paramount destroyer," says Michael Hoffman who adds:

 "I view my work as an expression of love for Judaic people and as a conduit for their liberation."

Politics today is a "debate over which vehicle is best for the supremacy of the Judaic people over humanity: ... Bolshevism [Soros] or Zionism [Trump]?"

by Michael Hoffman (Interview with The Saker)
(Excerpts by 

A prime source of Jew-hate is Talmudism itself, which oppressively tyrannizes and micromanages the lives of Judaics born through no fault of their own, into its psychic prison, while Israeli Zionism imprisons Judaics in a permanent war footing with the indigenous people of the Middle East. To free Judaic persons from these two prisons is an act of compassion and charity. We should never forget that our work is pro-Judaic. It is the Talmudic and Kabbalistic rabbis and Zionists who are putting Judaic people on the road to ruin.

Orthodox Judaism, which is the scion of the religion of the ancient Pharisees, is above all, self-worship, and pride is the paramount destroyer. In the occult scheme of things, the ideology closest to it was Hitler's National Socialism, in that it shares this predominant characteristic of pathological narcissism. 

Christians and many other goyim (gentiles) have been deluded into imagining that Judaism, while being somewhat flawed due to rejecting Jesus, nonetheless manages to be an ethical religion reflective of the prophets of the Old Testament. Hillel, the first century A.D. Pharisee who is believed to have been a contemporary of Jesus, and Moses Maimonides ("Rambam"), the medieval philosopher and theologian, are most often held up as exemplars of this supposed ethical Judaism...The myth of the benevolence of these two can only be sustained by ignorance...


Another defining theological aspect of Orthodox Judaism is its dogma that non-Jews are less than human. This is how the goyim are viewed in the Talmud and its sacred successor texts. In certain branches of Kabbalistic Judaism, such as the politically powerful and prominent Chabad-Lubavitch sect, their founder, Rabbi Shneur Zalman, formally promulgated the doctrine that goyim are not just less than human, they are non-human trash -- "supernal refuse" -- which is a reference to their Kabbalistic status as kelipot who possess "no redeeming qualities whatsoever..."

[During the Renaissance] members of the Roman Catholic hierarchy including many popes, were secretly initiated into Kabbalistic mysticism. The belt of that transmission is chronicled in detail in [my book] The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome

(Left, Michael Hoffman, world's foremost authority on Judaism)

Rabbinic Phariseeism is more than a religion opposed to Jesus for this reason: in its beginnings in the time before Christ, it existed as a creed founded upon esoteric oral teachings that nullify the Bible itself.
Orthodox Judaism is an anti-Biblical religion. Yes, it has a "Moses" and a "Noah" as its patrons and it names other patriarchs too, but these are not the Moses and Noah of the Bible. These are radically falsified figures who bear those names. Pharisac Judaism is contemptuous of the Biblical Noah about whom, in the Midrash, it makes scurrilous claims. There is even contempt for Moses. About Isaiah, who said that Israel has filthy lips, the Talmud teaches that Isaiah was justly killed by having his mouth sawed in half for "blaspheming Israel."

In both Left-wing New Age and Right-wing neo-Nazi circles, the heresy of Marcion is alive and well and the Old Testament is execrated. It is equated with the Talmud (most famously on the Right by Douglas Reed in The Controversy of Zion). The problem with that tack is that the Old Testament is absolutely not a book of self-worship of the Jews. It is radically different from the Babylonian Talmud. The Bible is an antidote to self-worship. The Old Testament excoriates Israelites in the strongest possible terms.


The bridge between not only Talmudic Judaism and Zionism, but Bolshevism as well, is personified by Moses Hess, who Karl Marx termed, "My Communist rabbi." Hess was not a rabbi in a formal sense, but he was enamored of the Talmud, as well as Communist and Zionist ideology. Hess recognized that what unites all three, their common bond, is Judaic self-worship. The controversies and rivalries arise in the debate over which vehicle is best for the supremacy of the Judaic people over humanity: Judaism, Bolshevism or Zionism? Hess argued that depending on the zeitgeist, any one of the three would prove suitable.

Orthodox Judaism is a religion of situation ethics. There are few beliefs that are not negotiable. What is non-negotiable is the supremacy of the Judaic people and whatever aids that supremacy. Nothing else counts. 

Look at Gershom Scholem, the German-Israeli scholar who helped to bring the Kabbalah into respectability and prominence in the Israeli state. Scholem and Judaic-American intellectual Hannah Arendt, left, the one-time girlfriend of German philosopher Martin Heidegger, had been friends in Paris before World War II. Arendt published a fair-minded book, Eichmann in Jerusalem, which infuriated Scholem. But not because she erred in her facts. He was incensed at her allegedly "heartless, downright malicious tone" regarding the Nazis' mass murders of Judaics, and he cast aspersions on her in the pages of Encounter magazine. Arendt had transgressed, according to Scholem, because she had failed to write in deference to the supreme criterion that must be the idol of every Judaic person: "ahavath Israel" ("love for the Jews"). The truths that Arendt had written were utterly beside the point.

If it turns out that Zionism is the best vehicle in our time for advancing Judaic supremacy, then most of the gedolei (rabbinic elite) of Orthodox Judaism will continue to cooperate with it. In his novel Oliver Twist, Charles Dickens portrayed the Judaic arch-criminal Fagin donning innumerable costumes and disguises. Talmudism, Bolshevism and Zionism are the garments that Judaic megalomania dons and discards as it marches through the corridors of time.

In the Israeli state, the one place on earth where Zionists have nearly complete power, how do the goyim fare? Would you like to be a Palestinian residing in Gaza, or even east Jerusalem for that matter? This is the fate of any subject population in any nation where Zionists or Orthodox rabbis possess something approximating total power.
Michael Hoffman's Website is Revisionist

Related- Hoffman - Judaism Discovered 

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Jews & Christians are Bamboozled by Judaism - Michael Hoffman"

Olivia said (June 24, 2018):

Sir, although most of this article is true, I do not agree that the Hebrew Israelites (descendants of the slaves) are an occult. Hebrew Israelite is a nationality, and is separate from religion or wicked deeds some stupid Hebrew Israelites partake in. Some Hebrew Israelites are evildoers, such as the people in your article.

Many Hebrew Israelites keep the laws, statues and commandments of The Most High God to the best of our ability. We follow the ways of the Holy Bible by the mercy and grace of our Lord and savior Yehushua. (Jesus). We are not church people and but follow the commandments. We believe the whole Bible is true. Most Hebrew Israelites have no association with pedophiles.

I think it is sad that after 400 years in this country we have finally found out our identity, and people do not share our excitement. Not even some of our own people.
In conclusion sir, there are some Hebrew Israelites who are members of occults and make all of us look bad. Same problem with other races.

CR replies:

While it's true that there are members of certain groups and movements that have no negative intentions themselves, you have to look at the origin of the movement and really consider where they are trying to lead people. See the biography of William S. Crowdy, original prophet of the Black Hebrew Israelites:

" Although still within the shadow of the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation, this unsung hero of faith, Prophet William S. Crowdy, excelled not only in the field of religion, but also as a businessman, industrialist, musician, Grand Master of Masons, author, and publisher."

The people behind the Black Hebrew Israelite movement were also behind the transatlantic slave trade and the Ku Klux Klan. There is nothing wrong with following the Bible, but when you start elevating yourself to the status of "God's chosen people" then there is a whole bunch of things that can go wrong. Look at the state of Israel for an example.


Thomas said (June 23, 2018):

n this article Marcion was briefly mentioned. Unfortunately there is very little literature about him, but a relatively detailed description of his life in German. I have a hunch that Marcion proclaimed the true teachings of Christianity. Through his interpretation of the early Christian sources, Marcion comes to the following conclusions:

The Jewish Creator God is cruel, but Jesus is love itself. However, Jesus says he is the Son of God, so he can only be the son of another God than the biblical Creator God. Jesus is for him the son of a good God.

The Old Testament is therefore rejected as a testimony of an old, evil God.

Therefore, the Christian religion cannot be derived from any old scripture. She comes into the world with Jesus. Jesus refers to a previously foreign, good God who has nothing in common with the Yahweh of the Old Testament.

All of Marcion's writings are literally understandable. He rejects any form of allegory.

All gospels are merely an attempt to confuse the truth of Christian doctrine and help the Jewish God Yahweh to reign.

Marcion only accepted the Gospels of Luke. But he considered this too to be falsified and worked it to uncover the true gospel. That is why in his treatment of the Gospel he removed all references to the old Creator God.

Could you perhaps write a biography of Marcion and his teachings in an article, as I think this person is very important for the jewish and christian people and almost nobody writes anything about him.

Many greetings from Germany

Jude Duffy said (June 23, 2018):

I saw Michael Hoffman's piece on your website, and thought to myself: how long before this turns into another attack on the real focus of his ire, the Catholic Church.

As usual, not very long. For the purpose of clarity, it really is long past time Mr Hoffman came clean about his own religious beliefs. If he believes the Catholic Church took a wrong turn in the Renaissance, what religious authority does he now defer to? And why, if he believes the Medieval Catholic Church was the true Church, does he spend so much of his time seeking to whitewash Luther, Calvin, Oliver Cromwell, the Huguenots, and the American and British Puritans, and their proven role in the rise of usurious capitalism? He claims, absurdly, that all of this "early Protestants as capitalist pioneers" business is an invention of Hilaire Belloc, but in truth Protestants were bragging about their role in the rise of usury long before Belloc was born, and many of them still brag of it today.

Hoffman's denunciations of the Catholic Church and his corresponding exaltation of Puritanism are deeply counter-intuitive in terms of argumentation. On the one hand, he claims all the Catholic condemnations of usury, freemasonry and so on were crafty ploys to hide the Church's true agenda; on the other he studiously ignores - or attempts to downplay -the proven role of Protestant Calvinists in the rise of usury - not just in Britain and the US, but also even in predominantly Catholic countries like France and Italy. He also ignores Protestant Anglo-Israelist domination of Freemasonry and Orangeism

His claims re the Church's supposed "secret agenda" are obviously unfalsifiable (since no one can conclusively prove that someone else is NOT a shill or a hypocrite - you can't prove a negative) and therefore worthless, whereas his efforts to portray Protestants as noble warriors against "the cryptrocrats" are laughably at odds with the historical facts.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at